Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T18:28:28.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Classification: the dialect area scenario

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

The assumption we examined in the previous chapter was that linguistic distance between dialects is proportional to geographic distance between dialect sites. We concluded that this assumption is not perfectly borne out by the data. There is, however, an alternative view, according to which dialect landscapes may be geographically organized along the lines of geographically coherent, linguistically homogeneous, and clearly demarcated “areas within which similar varieties are spoken” (Heeringa and Nerbonne 2001, 375). In Section 6.1, we present a literature review of the history of thought on dialect areas. Section 6.2 proceeds deductively and explores the explanatory power of previous dialect partitions for the present study's dataset. Section 6.3 takes an inductive approach and marshals cluster analytical statistical analysis techniques to derive dialect groupings from the dataset. Section 6.4 summarizes this chapter's major findings.

On the notion of dialect areas

Attempts at regionalization, classification, and the quest for dialect areas all have a long and strongly entrenched tradition in dialectology. Indeed, for a long time the dialect area scenario was a great deal more popular among dialectologists than the more fuzzy – and arguably more modern – continuum view, which we discussed in the previous chapter. How come? Harnisch (2009, 275) notes that “traditional dialectology had an elementary interest in dialectal dissimilarity in so far as it attempted to explore the boundaries (isoglosses) of ‘old’ language spaces along which the variants of certain linguistic features or bundles of features differed.” In pursuing this research agenda, traditional dialectology overlapped with folk beliefs that every language or dialect has, or ought to have, its sovereign territory (Auer 2004, 149–150).

Type
Chapter
Information
Grammatical Variation in British English Dialects
A Study in Corpus-Based Dialectometry
, pp. 111 - 127
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×