Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:56:43.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Jean-Christophe Merle
Affiliation:
Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beccaria, Cesare. On crimes and punishments, in Beccaria On crimes and punishments and other writings, ed. Bellamy, Richard, trans. Davies, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 1–113.
Bentham, Jeremy. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation, reprint of 1823 edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1907).
Camus, Albert. Reflections on the guillotine: an essay on capital punishment by the 1957 Nobel Prize winner, trans. Howard, Richard (Michigan City, Ind.: Fridtjof-Karla Publications, 1959).
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. On duties, ed. Griffin, M. T. and Atkins, E. M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Dühring, Eugen. Cursus der Philosophie als streng wissenschaftlicher Weltanschauung und Lebensgestaltung (Leipzig: O. R. Reisland, 1894–5).
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Foundations of natural right, ed. Frederick, Neuhouser, trans. Baur, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Grotius, Hugo. The rights of war and peace, ed. Tuck, Richard (3 vols., Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc., 2005).
Hegel, G. W. F.Elements of the philosophy of right, trans. Nisbet, H. B. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Hegel, G. W. F.Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft (1818/19), in Hegel, and Vorlesungen über Rechtsphilosophie, ed. Lauth, Reinhard (4 vols., Stuttgart and Bad-Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1973–4), vol. 1, pp. 217–351.
Hegel, G. W. F.Philosophie des Rechts (1824/25), in Hegel, Vorlesungen über Rechtsphilosophie, ed. Lauth, Reinhard (4 vols., Stuttgart and Bad-Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1973–4), vol. 4, pp. 67–752.
Hegel, G. W. F.Principes de la philosophie du droit, trans. Kervégan, Jean-François (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998).
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, ed. Walter, A. R. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1904).
Jhering, Rudolf. Law as a means to an end, ed. Drake, Joseph H., trans. Husik, Isaac (Union, NJ: Lawbrook Exchange, 1999).
Kant, Immanuel. Kants gesammelte Schriften (Berlin: Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1902).
Kant, ImmanuelLectures on ethics, ed. Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B., trans. Heath, Peter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
Klein, Ernst Ferdinand. Grundlinien des gemeinen deutschen und preußischen peinlichen Rechts (Halle: Hemmerde und Schwetschke, 1796).
Krause, Karl Christian Friedrich. Abhandlung über die Idee und die Eintheilung der Philosophie und der Mathematik und den innigen Zusammenhang beider, in Hohlfield, Paul and Wünsche, August (eds.), Philosophische Abhandlungen: aus dem handschriftlichen Nachlasse (Leipzig: Schulze, 1889), pp. 5–40.
Krause, Karl Christian FriedrichGrundlage des Naturrechts oder philosophischer Grundriß des Ideals des Rechts, (Jena: Gabler, 1803).
Mably, Gabriel. “De la législation,” in œuvres complètes (12 vols., London, 1789).
Mill, John Stuart. “April 1868 speech on capital punishment,” in Mill, Utilitarianism, ed. Sher, George (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2001), pp. 65–70.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the genealogy of morality, ed. Ansell-Pearson, Keith, trans. Diethe, Carol (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Plato, . Laws, trans. Saunders, Trevor J., in Cooper, John M. and Hutchinson, D. S. (eds.), Plato: Complete works (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997), pp. 1318–1616.
Pufendorf, Samuel. De jure naturae et gentium, ed. Scott, James Brown, trans. , C. H. and Oldfather, W. A., Classics of International Law (2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press / London: Humphrey Milford, 1934).
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The world as will and idea, trans. Haldane, R. B. and Kemp, J., seventh edition (4 vols., London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co., 1909?).
Schroeder, Friedrich-Christian (ed.). Die Carolina: die Peinliche Gerichtsordnung Kaiser Karls V. von 1532 (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1986).
Seneca, . De ira, in Moral essays, trans. Basore, John W. (3 vols., London: Heinemann/Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press, 1928), vol. 1, pp. 106–355.
Sidgwick, Henry. The elements of politics, reprint of 1891 edition (New York: Cosimo Classics, 2005).
Voltaire, . “Commentary on the book On crimes and punishments, by a provincial lawyer,” in Voltaire, Political writings, ed. and trans. Williams, David (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 244–79.
Altman, Andrew and Wellman, Christopher Heath. “A defense of international criminal law,” Ethics, 115, no. 1 (2004), 35–67.Google Scholar
Ataner, Attila. “Kant on capital punishment and suicide,” Kant-Studien, 97, no. 4 (2006), 452–82.Google Scholar
Badinter, Robert. L'Abolition (Paris: Fayard, 2000).
Bedau, Hugo. “Retribution and the theory of punishment,” Journal of Philosophy, 75, no. 11 (1978), 601–20.Google Scholar
Benn, Stanley. “An approach to the problems of punishment,” Philosophy, 33 (1958), 321–41.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Hermann. “Abolition: assensus and sanctuary,” in Duff, Alexander R. and Garland, David (eds.), A reader on punishment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 336–51.
Bosanquet, Bernard. The philosophical theory of the state (London and New York: Macmillan, 1899).
Braithwaite, John. Crime, shame and reintegration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
Braithwaite, John and Pettit, Philip. Not just deserts: a republican theory of criminal justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).
Brandt, Reinhard. “Das Erlaubnisgesetz, oder: Vernunft und Geschichte in Kants Rechtslehre,” in Brandt, R. (ed.), Rechtsphilosophie der Aufklärung: Symposium Wolfenbüttel 1981 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1982), pp. 233–85.
Breazeale, Daniel. Philosophy and truth: selections from Nietzsche's Notebooks of the early 1870s (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1979).
Brugger, Winfried. “Darf der Staat ausnahmsweise foltern?” Der Staat, 35 (1996), 67–97.Google Scholar
Brugger, Winifried“Vom unbedingten Verbot der Folter zum bedingten Recht auf Folter?Juristenzeitung, 35, no. 4 (18 February 2000), 165–73.Google Scholar
Byrd, Sharon. “Kant's theory of punishment: deterrence in its threat, retribution in its execution,” Law and Philosophy, 8, no. 2 (1989), 151–200.Google Scholar
Clark, Michael. “A non-retributive approach to punishment,” Ratio, 17, no. 1 (2004), 12–27.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann. Schriften zur Philosophie und Zeitgeschichte, ed. Görland, Albert and Cassirer, Ernst (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1928).
Deith, John. “On the right to be punished: some doubts,” Ethics, 94 (1984), 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. Problems at the roots of law: essays in legal and political theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
Fichtelberg, Aaron. “Crimes beyond justice? Retributivism and war crimes,” Criminal Justice Ethics, 24, no. 1 (2005), 31–46.Google Scholar
Flechtheim, Ossip Kurt. “Die Funktion der Strafe in der Rechtstheorie Hegels,” in Flechtheim, Von Hegel zu Kelsen: rechtstheoretische Aufsätze (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1963), pp. 9–20.
Flechtheim, Ossip Kurt“Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Straftrechtstheorie,” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 54 (1968), 539–48.Google Scholar
Flechtheim, Ossip KurtHegels Straftheorie (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1975).
Fletcher, George P. Basic concepts of criminal law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).
Forster, Wolfgang. Karl Christian Friedrich Krauses frühe Rechtsphilosophie und ihr geistesgeschichtlicher Hintergrund (Ebelsbach: Aktiv Druck und Verlag, 2000).
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison, trans. Sheridan, Alan, second edition (New York: Random House, 1995).
Garapon, Antoine. Des crimes qu'on ne peut ni punir ni pardonner (Paris: Editions Odile Jacob, 2002).
Guillarme, Bertrand. Penser la peine (Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris, 2003).
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. Why deliberative democracy? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).
Hampton, Jean and Murphy, Jeffrie. Forgiveness and mercy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Hart, H. L. A.Punishment and responsibility (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968).
Hassemer, Winfried. Einführung in die Grundlagen des Strafrechts, second edition (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1990).
Hill, Thomas E. “Kant on punishment: a coherent mix of deterrence and retribution,” Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 5 (1997), 291–314.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E“Kant on wrongdoing, desert, and punishment,” Law and Philosophy, 18 (1999), 407–41.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas EHuman welfare and moral worth: Kantian perspectives (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002).
Höffe, Otfried. Gibt es ein interkulturelles Strafrecht? Ein philosophischer Versuch (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1999).
Höffe, Otfried(ed.). Immanuel Kant: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1999).
Höffe, Otfried“Vom Straf- und Begnadigungsrecht,” in Höffe, O (ed.), Immanuel Kant: metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1999), pp. 213–33.
Höffe, Otfried“Königliche Völker”: zu Kants kosmopolitischer Rechts- und Friedenstheorie (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 2001).
Höffe, OtfriedCategorical principles of law: a counterpoint to modernity (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002).
Höffe, OtfriedGerechtigkeit: eine philosophische Einführung (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2004).
Holtman, Sarah. “Toward social reform: Kant's penal theory reinterpreted,” Utilitas, 9 (1997), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honderich, Ted. Punishment: the supposed justifications (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1969).
Honneth, Axel. The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts, trans. Anderson, Joel (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996).
Hösle, Vittorio. “Was darf und was soll der Staat bestrafen?”, in Hösle, Rechtsphilosophie des deutschen Idealismus (Hamburg: F. Meiner, 1989).
Kaufmann, Matthias. Rechtsphilosophie (Freiburg i.Br.: K. Alber, 1996).
Kaufmann, Matthias“Zwangsrecht (§§ 13–16),” in Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.), Fichte, Johann Gottlieb: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2001), pp. 125–37.
Kersting, Wolfgang. “Sittengesetz und Rechtsgesetz: die Begrundung des Rechts bei Kant und den frühen Kantianern,” in Brandt, Reinhard (ed.), Rechtsphilosophie der Aufklärung: Symposium Wolfenbüttel 1981 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1982), pp. 147–77.
Kersting, WolfgangWohlgeordnete Freiheit: Immanuel Kants Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie, second edition (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1993).
Kleinig, John. “Punishment and moral seriousness,” Israel Law Review, 25, no. 3 (1991), 401–21.Google Scholar
Klug, Ulrich. “Abschied von Kant und Hegel,” in Baumann, Jürgen (ed.), Programm für ein neues Strafgesetzbuch: der Alternativ-Entwurf der Strafrechtslehrer (Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer, 1968), pp. 36–41.
Koller, Peter. “Probleme der utilitaristischen Strafrechtfertigung,” Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 91 (1979), 45–95.Google Scholar
Köstlin, Christian R. Neue Revision der Grundbegriffe des Kriminalrechts, reprint (Aalen: Scientia, 1970).
Kühl, Kristian. Die Bedeutung der Rechtsphilosophie für das Strafrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001).
Landau, Peter. “Karl Christian Friedrich Krauses Rechtsphilosophie,” in Kodalle, Klaus-Michael (ed.), Karl Christian Friedrich Krause (1781–1832): Studien zu seiner Philosophie und zum Krausismo (Hamburg: Meiner, 1985), pp. 80–92.
Lazzari, Alessandro. “Eine Fessel, die nicht schmerzt und nicht sehr hindert: Strafrecht,” in Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin:Akademie Verlag, 2001), pp. 173–86.
Lesch, Heiko Hartmut. Der Verbrechensbegriff: Grundlinien einer funktionalen Revision (Cologne: Heymanns, 1999).
Liszt, Franz. Der Zweckgedanke im Strafrecht (Berlin, 1883).
Ludwig, Bernd. Kants Rechtslehre (Hamburg: F. Meiner, 1988).
May, Larry. Crimes against humanity: a normative account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
McTaggart, John E. Studies in Hegelian cosmology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1918).
Merle, Jean-Christophe. “Il punto di vista educativo e religioso dei Contributi destinati a rettificare il giudizio del pubblico sulla Rivoluzione francese: la dimensione politica del Saggio di una critica di ogni rivelazione,” in Masullo, Aldo and Ivaldo, Marco (eds.), Filosofia trascendentale e destinazione etica (Milan: Guerini, 1995), pp. 303–25.
Merle, Jean-ChristopheJustice et progrès: contribution à une doctrine du droit économique et social (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1997).
Merle, Jean-Christophe(ed.). “Eigentumsrecht,” in Merle, (ed.), , Johann Gottlieb Fichte:Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2001), pp. 159–72.
Mohr, Georg. “Unrecht und Strafe,” in Siep, Ludwig (ed.), G. W. F. Hegel: Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1997), pp. 95–124.
Murphy, Jeffrie G. “Does Kant have a theory of punishment?Columbia Law Review, 87 (1987), 509–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, Ulfried and Schroth, Ulrich. Neuere Theorien von Kriminalität und Strafe (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1980).
Ottmann, Henning. Philosophie und Politik bei Nietzsche (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1987).
Pelczynski, Zbigniew A. (ed.). Hegel's political philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971).
Piontkowski, Andrei A. Hegels Lehre über Staat und Recht und seine Strafrechtstheorie, trans. Neuland, Anna (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1960).
Pogge, Thomas W. “Is Kant's Rechtslehre comprehensive?Southern Journal of Philosophy, 36, supplement (1997), 161–87.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas W“Is Kant's Rechtslehre a ‘comprehensive liberalism’?” in Timmons, Mark (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of morals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 133–58.
Primorac, Igor. “Punishment as the criminal right,” Hegel-Studien, 15 (1980), 187–98.Google Scholar
Primoratz, Igor. “Banquos Geist: Hegels Theorie der Strafe,” Hegel-Studien, 29, supplement (1986).Google Scholar
Pugsley, Robert A. “A retributivist argument against capital punishment,” Hofstra Law Review, 9 (1981), 1501–23.Google Scholar
Quinton, Anthony M. “On punishment,” in Acton, Harry Burrows (ed.), The philosophy of punishment (London: Macmillan, 1969), pp. 55–64.
Radbruch, Gustav. Rechtsphilosophie, ed. Wolf, Erik, seventh edition (Stuttgart: K. F. Koehler, 1970).
Ricœur, Paul. Le Juste (Paris: Editions Esprit, 1995).
Ripstein, Arthur. Equality, responsibility and the law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Rosen, Fred. “Utilitarianism and the punishment of the innocent: the origins of a false doctrine,” Utilitas, 9, no. 1 (March 1997), 23–37.Google Scholar
Roxin, Claus. Strafrechtliche Grundlagenprobleme (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1973).
Roxin, Claus “‘Schuld’ und ‘Verantwortlichkeit’ als strafrechtliche Systemkategorien,” in Roxin, (ed.), Grundfragen der gesamten Strafrechtswissenschaft (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1974), pp. 171–97.
Scala, Klaus. “Hegels Begriff der Strafe und die moderne Strafvollzugsproblematik,”Hegel-Jahrbuch (1987), 164–70.Google Scholar
Scharf, Michael P. “Justice vs. peace,” in Sewall, Sarah B. and Kaysen, Carl (eds.), The United States and the International Criminal Court: national security and international law (Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000), pp. 213–36.
Scheid, Don E. “Kant's retributivism,” Ethics, 93 (1983), 262–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schild, Wolfgang. “Ende und Zukunft des Staatsrechts,” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 70 (1984), 71–112.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Steven S. “Kantianism and the death penalty,” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 70 (1985), 343–77.Google Scholar
Seelmann, Kurt. “Versuch einer Legitimation von Strafe durch das Argument selbstwidersprüchlichen Verhaltens des Straftäters,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, 1 (1993), 315–26.Google Scholar
Seelmann, KurtWechselseitige Anerkennung und Unrecht: Strafe als Postulat der Gerechtigkeit?Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 79, no. 2 (1993), 228–36.Google Scholar
Shue, Henry. “Torture,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7, no. 2 (1977–88), 124–43.Google Scholar
Sorell, Tom. Moral theory and capital punishment (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987).
Stillman, Peter G. “Hegel's idea of punishment,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 14 (1976), 169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunick, Mark. Hegel's political philosophy: interpreting the practice of legal punishment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992).
Haag, Ernest. “Why capital punishment?” Albany Law Review, 54, nos. 3–4 (1990), 501–14.Google Scholar
Willascheck, Marcus. “Why the Doctrine of Right does not belong in the Metaphysics of Morals,” Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 5 (1997), 205–27.Google Scholar
Wolf, Jean-Claude. Verhütung oder Vergeltung? Einführung in ethische Straftheorien (Freiburg i.Br.: Alber, 1992).
Wolf, Jean-ClaudeStrafe als Widerherstellung eines Gleichgewichts,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, 11 (2003), 199–216.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. Hegel's ethical thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).
Wood, Allen W “Kant's Doctrine of right,” Introduction to Höffe, Otfried (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1999), pp. 19–39.
Zaczyk, Rainer. Das Strafrecht in der Rechtslehre J. G. Fichtes (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1981).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jean-Christophe Merle, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany
  • Book: German Idealism and the Concept of Punishment
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770425.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jean-Christophe Merle, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany
  • Book: German Idealism and the Concept of Punishment
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770425.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jean-Christophe Merle, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany
  • Book: German Idealism and the Concept of Punishment
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770425.013
Available formats
×