Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. German Idealism and the Concept of Punishment
  • Cited by 6
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
August 2010
Print publication year:
2009
Online ISBN:
9780511770425
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770425
Subjects:
History of Philosophy, Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, Philosophy
Series:
Modern European Philosophy
Information

Book description

Against the background of early modernism - a period that justified punishment by general deterrence - Kant is usually thought to represent a radical turn towards retributivism. For Kant, and later for Fichte and Hegel, a just punishment respects the humanity inherent in the criminal, and serves no external ends - it is instituted only because the criminal deserves it. In this original study, Jean-Christophe Merle uses close analysis of texts to show that these philosophers did not in fact hold a retributivist position, or even a mixed position; instead he traces in their work the gradual emergence of views in favour of deterrence and resocialisation. He also examines Nietzsche's view that morality rests on the rejection of retribution. His final chapter offers a challenge to the retributivist position, and a defence of resocialisation, in the context of current legal theory and practice concerning the punishment of crimes against humanity.

Reviews

‘Merle's book is a first-rate, refreshingly new piece of scholarship on Kant and German idealism. Almost all scholarship on the philosophers in question either argue or just assume that Kant, Fichte, and Hegel are retributivists when it comes to punishment. Merle shows that the relevant texts in question are in fact very ambiguous, even somewhat confused in places, but that it is overwhelmingly clear that none of these three philosophers holds an unequivocally retributivist position. In reading this book, I not only found my own prior views on the topic challenged, I found I had learned a great deal by the time I had finished.’

Terry Pinkard - Georgetown University

'… informed and sophisticated … thoughtful and … compelling … important work in the history of philosophy …'

Source: British Journal for the History of Philosophy

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
Bibliography
Primary texts
Beccaria, Cesare. On crimes and punishments, in Beccaria On crimes and punishments and other writings, ed. Bellamy, Richard, trans. Davies, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 1–113.
Bentham, Jeremy. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation, reprint of 1823 edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1907).
Camus, Albert. Reflections on the guillotine: an essay on capital punishment by the 1957 Nobel Prize winner, trans. Howard, Richard (Michigan City, Ind.: Fridtjof-Karla Publications, 1959).
Cicero, Marcus Tullius. On duties, ed. Griffin, M. T. and Atkins, E. M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Dühring, Eugen. Cursus der Philosophie als streng wissenschaftlicher Weltanschauung und Lebensgestaltung (Leipzig: O. R. Reisland, 1894–5).
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Foundations of natural right, ed. Frederick, Neuhouser, trans. Baur, Michael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Grotius, Hugo. The rights of war and peace, ed. Tuck, Richard (3 vols., Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc., 2005).
Hegel, G. W. F.Elements of the philosophy of right, trans. Nisbet, H. B. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Hegel, G. W. F.Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft (1818/19), in Hegel, and Vorlesungen über Rechtsphilosophie, ed. Lauth, Reinhard (4 vols., Stuttgart and Bad-Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1973–4), vol. 1, pp. 217–351.
Hegel, G. W. F.Philosophie des Rechts (1824/25), in Hegel, Vorlesungen über Rechtsphilosophie, ed. Lauth, Reinhard (4 vols., Stuttgart and Bad-Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1973–4), vol. 4, pp. 67–752.
Hegel, G. W. F.Principes de la philosophie du droit, trans. Kervégan, Jean-François (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998).
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, ed. Walter, A. R. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1904).
Jhering, Rudolf. Law as a means to an end, ed. Drake, Joseph H., trans. Husik, Isaac (Union, NJ: Lawbrook Exchange, 1999).
Kant, Immanuel. Kants gesammelte Schriften (Berlin: Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1902).
Kant, ImmanuelLectures on ethics, ed. Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B., trans. Heath, Peter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
Klein, Ernst Ferdinand. Grundlinien des gemeinen deutschen und preußischen peinlichen Rechts (Halle: Hemmerde und Schwetschke, 1796).
Krause, Karl Christian Friedrich. Abhandlung über die Idee und die Eintheilung der Philosophie und der Mathematik und den innigen Zusammenhang beider, in Hohlfield, Paul and Wünsche, August (eds.), Philosophische Abhandlungen: aus dem handschriftlichen Nachlasse (Leipzig: Schulze, 1889), pp. 5–40.
Krause, Karl Christian FriedrichGrundlage des Naturrechts oder philosophischer Grundriß des Ideals des Rechts, (Jena: Gabler, 1803).
Mably, Gabriel. “De la législation,” in œuvres complètes (12 vols., London, 1789).
Mill, John Stuart. “April 1868 speech on capital punishment,” in Mill, Utilitarianism, ed. Sher, George (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2001), pp. 65–70.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the genealogy of morality, ed. Ansell-Pearson, Keith, trans. Diethe, Carol (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Plato, . Laws, trans. Saunders, Trevor J., in Cooper, John M. and Hutchinson, D. S. (eds.), Plato: Complete works (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997), pp. 1318–1616.
Pufendorf, Samuel. De jure naturae et gentium, ed. Scott, James Brown, trans. , C. H. and Oldfather, W. A., Classics of International Law (2 vols., Oxford: Clarendon Press / London: Humphrey Milford, 1934).
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The world as will and idea, trans. Haldane, R. B. and Kemp, J., seventh edition (4 vols., London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co., 1909?).
Schroeder, Friedrich-Christian (ed.). Die Carolina: die Peinliche Gerichtsordnung Kaiser Karls V. von 1532 (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1986).
Seneca, . De ira, in Moral essays, trans. Basore, John W. (3 vols., London: Heinemann/Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press, 1928), vol. 1, pp. 106–355.
Sidgwick, Henry. The elements of politics, reprint of 1891 edition (New York: Cosimo Classics, 2005).
Voltaire, . “Commentary on the book On crimes and punishments, by a provincial lawyer,” in Voltaire, Political writings, ed. and trans. Williams, David (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 244–79.
Secondary texts
Altman, Andrew and Wellman, Christopher Heath. “A defense of international criminal law,” Ethics, 115, no. 1 (2004), 35–67.
Ataner, Attila. “Kant on capital punishment and suicide,” Kant-Studien, 97, no. 4 (2006), 452–82.
Badinter, Robert. L'Abolition (Paris: Fayard, 2000).
Bedau, Hugo. “Retribution and the theory of punishment,” Journal of Philosophy, 75, no. 11 (1978), 601–20.
Benn, Stanley. “An approach to the problems of punishment,” Philosophy, 33 (1958), 321–41.
Bianchi, Hermann. “Abolition: assensus and sanctuary,” in Duff, Alexander R. and Garland, David (eds.), A reader on punishment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 336–51.
Bosanquet, Bernard. The philosophical theory of the state (London and New York: Macmillan, 1899).
Braithwaite, John. Crime, shame and reintegration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
Braithwaite, John and Pettit, Philip. Not just deserts: a republican theory of criminal justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).
Brandt, Reinhard. “Das Erlaubnisgesetz, oder: Vernunft und Geschichte in Kants Rechtslehre,” in Brandt, R. (ed.), Rechtsphilosophie der Aufklärung: Symposium Wolfenbüttel 1981 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1982), pp. 233–85.
Breazeale, Daniel. Philosophy and truth: selections from Nietzsche's Notebooks of the early 1870s (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1979).
Brugger, Winfried. “Darf der Staat ausnahmsweise foltern?” Der Staat, 35 (1996), 67–97.
Brugger, Winifried“Vom unbedingten Verbot der Folter zum bedingten Recht auf Folter?” Juristenzeitung, 35, no. 4 (18 February 2000), 165–73.
Byrd, Sharon. “Kant's theory of punishment: deterrence in its threat, retribution in its execution,” Law and Philosophy, 8, no. 2 (1989), 151–200.
Clark, Michael. “A non-retributive approach to punishment,” Ratio, 17, no. 1 (2004), 12–27.
Cohen, Hermann. Schriften zur Philosophie und Zeitgeschichte, ed. Görland, Albert and Cassirer, Ernst (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1928).
Deith, John. “On the right to be punished: some doubts,” Ethics, 94 (1984), 191–211.
Feinberg, Joel. Problems at the roots of law: essays in legal and political theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
Fichtelberg, Aaron. “Crimes beyond justice? Retributivism and war crimes,” Criminal Justice Ethics, 24, no. 1 (2005), 31–46.
Flechtheim, Ossip Kurt. “Die Funktion der Strafe in der Rechtstheorie Hegels,” in Flechtheim, Von Hegel zu Kelsen: rechtstheoretische Aufsätze (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1963), pp. 9–20.
Flechtheim, Ossip Kurt“Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Straftrechtstheorie,” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 54 (1968), 539–48.
Flechtheim, Ossip KurtHegels Straftheorie (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1975).
Fletcher, George P. Basic concepts of criminal law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).
Forster, Wolfgang. Karl Christian Friedrich Krauses frühe Rechtsphilosophie und ihr geistesgeschichtlicher Hintergrund (Ebelsbach: Aktiv Druck und Verlag, 2000).
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison, trans. Sheridan, Alan, second edition (New York: Random House, 1995).
Garapon, Antoine. Des crimes qu'on ne peut ni punir ni pardonner (Paris: Editions Odile Jacob, 2002).
Guillarme, Bertrand. Penser la peine (Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris, 2003).
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. Why deliberative democracy? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).
Hampton, Jean and Murphy, Jeffrie. Forgiveness and mercy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Hart, H. L. A.Punishment and responsibility (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968).
Hassemer, Winfried. Einführung in die Grundlagen des Strafrechts, second edition (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1990).
Hill, Thomas E. “Kant on punishment: a coherent mix of deterrence and retribution,” Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 5 (1997), 291–314.
Hill, Thomas E“Kant on wrongdoing, desert, and punishment,” Law and Philosophy, 18 (1999), 407–41.
Hill, Thomas EHuman welfare and moral worth: Kantian perspectives (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002).
Höffe, Otfried. Gibt es ein interkulturelles Strafrecht? Ein philosophischer Versuch (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1999).
Höffe, Otfried(ed.). Immanuel Kant: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1999).
Höffe, Otfried“Vom Straf- und Begnadigungsrecht,” in Höffe, O (ed.), Immanuel Kant: metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1999), pp. 213–33.
Höffe, Otfried“Königliche Völker”: zu Kants kosmopolitischer Rechts- und Friedenstheorie (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 2001).
Höffe, OtfriedCategorical principles of law: a counterpoint to modernity (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002).
Höffe, OtfriedGerechtigkeit: eine philosophische Einführung (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2004).
Holtman, Sarah. “Toward social reform: Kant's penal theory reinterpreted,” Utilitas, 9 (1997), 3–21.
Honderich, Ted. Punishment: the supposed justifications (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1969).
Honneth, Axel. The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts, trans. Anderson, Joel (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996).
Hösle, Vittorio. “Was darf und was soll der Staat bestrafen?”, in Hösle, Rechtsphilosophie des deutschen Idealismus (Hamburg: F. Meiner, 1989).
Kaufmann, Matthias. Rechtsphilosophie (Freiburg i.Br.: K. Alber, 1996).
Kaufmann, Matthias“Zwangsrecht (§§ 13–16),” in Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.), Fichte, Johann Gottlieb: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2001), pp. 125–37.
Kersting, Wolfgang. “Sittengesetz und Rechtsgesetz: die Begrundung des Rechts bei Kant und den frühen Kantianern,” in Brandt, Reinhard (ed.), Rechtsphilosophie der Aufklärung: Symposium Wolfenbüttel 1981 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1982), pp. 147–77.
Kersting, WolfgangWohlgeordnete Freiheit: Immanuel Kants Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie, second edition (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1993).
Kleinig, John. “Punishment and moral seriousness,” Israel Law Review, 25, no. 3 (1991), 401–21.
Klug, Ulrich. “Abschied von Kant und Hegel,” in Baumann, Jürgen (ed.), Programm für ein neues Strafgesetzbuch: der Alternativ-Entwurf der Strafrechtslehrer (Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer, 1968), pp. 36–41.
Koller, Peter. “Probleme der utilitaristischen Strafrechtfertigung,” Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 91 (1979), 45–95.
Köstlin, Christian R. Neue Revision der Grundbegriffe des Kriminalrechts, reprint (Aalen: Scientia, 1970).
Kühl, Kristian. Die Bedeutung der Rechtsphilosophie für das Strafrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001).
Landau, Peter. “Karl Christian Friedrich Krauses Rechtsphilosophie,” in Kodalle, Klaus-Michael (ed.), Karl Christian Friedrich Krause (1781–1832): Studien zu seiner Philosophie und zum Krausismo (Hamburg: Meiner, 1985), pp. 80–92.
Lazzari, Alessandro. “Eine Fessel, die nicht schmerzt und nicht sehr hindert: Strafrecht,” in Merle, Jean-Christophe (ed.), Johann Gottlieb Fichte: Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin:Akademie Verlag, 2001), pp. 173–86.
Lesch, Heiko Hartmut. Der Verbrechensbegriff: Grundlinien einer funktionalen Revision (Cologne: Heymanns, 1999).
Liszt, Franz. Der Zweckgedanke im Strafrecht (Berlin, 1883).
Ludwig, Bernd. Kants Rechtslehre (Hamburg: F. Meiner, 1988).
May, Larry. Crimes against humanity: a normative account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
McTaggart, John E. Studies in Hegelian cosmology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1918).
Merle, Jean-Christophe. “Il punto di vista educativo e religioso dei Contributi destinati a rettificare il giudizio del pubblico sulla Rivoluzione francese: la dimensione politica del Saggio di una critica di ogni rivelazione,” in Masullo, Aldo and Ivaldo, Marco (eds.), Filosofia trascendentale e destinazione etica (Milan: Guerini, 1995), pp. 303–25.
Merle, Jean-ChristopheJustice et progrès: contribution à une doctrine du droit économique et social (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1997).
Merle, Jean-Christophe(ed.). “Eigentumsrecht,” in Merle, (ed.), , Johann Gottlieb Fichte:Grundlage des Naturrechts (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2001), pp. 159–72.
Mohr, Georg. “Unrecht und Strafe,” in Siep, Ludwig (ed.), G. W. F. Hegel: Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1997), pp. 95–124.
Murphy, Jeffrie G. “Does Kant have a theory of punishment?” Columbia Law Review, 87 (1987), 509–32.
Neumann, Ulfried and Schroth, Ulrich. Neuere Theorien von Kriminalität und Strafe (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1980).
Ottmann, Henning. Philosophie und Politik bei Nietzsche (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1987).
Pelczynski, Zbigniew A. (ed.). Hegel's political philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971).
Piontkowski, Andrei A. Hegels Lehre über Staat und Recht und seine Strafrechtstheorie, trans. Neuland, Anna (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1960).
Pogge, Thomas W. “Is Kant's Rechtslehre comprehensive?” Southern Journal of Philosophy, 36, supplement (1997), 161–87.
Pogge, Thomas W“Is Kant's Rechtslehre a ‘comprehensive liberalism’?” in Timmons, Mark (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of morals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 133–58.
Primorac, Igor. “Punishment as the criminal right,” Hegel-Studien, 15 (1980), 187–98.
Primoratz, Igor. “Banquos Geist: Hegels Theorie der Strafe,” Hegel-Studien, 29, supplement (1986).
Pugsley, Robert A. “A retributivist argument against capital punishment,” Hofstra Law Review, 9 (1981), 1501–23.
Quinton, Anthony M. “On punishment,” in Acton, Harry Burrows (ed.), The philosophy of punishment (London: Macmillan, 1969), pp. 55–64.
Radbruch, Gustav. Rechtsphilosophie, ed. Wolf, Erik, seventh edition (Stuttgart: K. F. Koehler, 1970).
Ricœur, Paul. Le Juste (Paris: Editions Esprit, 1995).
Ripstein, Arthur. Equality, responsibility and the law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Rosen, Fred. “Utilitarianism and the punishment of the innocent: the origins of a false doctrine,” Utilitas, 9, no. 1 (March 1997), 23–37.
Roxin, Claus. Strafrechtliche Grundlagenprobleme (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1973).
Roxin, Claus “‘Schuld’ und ‘Verantwortlichkeit’ als strafrechtliche Systemkategorien,” in Roxin, (ed.), Grundfragen der gesamten Strafrechtswissenschaft (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1974), pp. 171–97.
Scala, Klaus. “Hegels Begriff der Strafe und die moderne Strafvollzugsproblematik,”Hegel-Jahrbuch (1987), 164–70.
Scharf, Michael P. “Justice vs. peace,” in Sewall, Sarah B. and Kaysen, Carl (eds.), The United States and the International Criminal Court: national security and international law (Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000), pp. 213–36.
Scheid, Don E. “Kant's retributivism,” Ethics, 93 (1983), 262–82.
Schild, Wolfgang. “Ende und Zukunft des Staatsrechts,” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 70 (1984), 71–112.
Schwarzschild, Steven S. “Kantianism and the death penalty,” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 70 (1985), 343–77.
Seelmann, Kurt. “Versuch einer Legitimation von Strafe durch das Argument selbstwidersprüchlichen Verhaltens des Straftäters,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, 1 (1993), 315–26.
Seelmann, Kurt“Wechselseitige Anerkennung und Unrecht: Strafe als Postulat der Gerechtigkeit?” Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 79, no. 2 (1993), 228–36.
Shue, Henry. “Torture,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7, no. 2 (1977–88), 124–43.
Sorell, Tom. Moral theory and capital punishment (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987).
Stillman, Peter G. “Hegel's idea of punishment,” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 14 (1976), 169–82.
Tunick, Mark. Hegel's political philosophy: interpreting the practice of legal punishment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992).
Haag, Ernest. “Why capital punishment?” Albany Law Review, 54, nos. 3–4 (1990), 501–14.
Willascheck, Marcus. “Why the Doctrine of Right does not belong in the Metaphysics of Morals,” Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 5 (1997), 205–27.
Wolf, Jean-Claude. Verhütung oder Vergeltung? Einführung in ethische Straftheorien (Freiburg i.Br.: Alber, 1992).
Wolf, Jean-Claude “Strafe als Widerherstellung eines Gleichgewichts,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik, 11 (2003), 199–216.
Wood, Allen W. Hegel's ethical thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).
Wood, Allen W “Kant's Doctrine of right,” Introduction to Höffe, Otfried (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1999), pp. 19–39.
Zaczyk, Rainer. Das Strafrecht in der Rechtslehre J. G. Fichtes (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1981).

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.