Spatial Ability as a Mediator of Gender Differences on Mathematics Tests: A Biological–Environmental Framework

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511614446.007

6 - Spatial Ability as a Mediator of Gender Differences on Mathematics Tests: A Biological–Environmental Framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Ronald L. Nuttall ,

M. Beth Casey and

Elizabeth Pezaris

Edited by

Ann M. Gallagher and

James C. Kaufman

Show author details

Ronald L. Nuttall: Affiliation:
Boston collage
M. Beth Casey: Affiliation:
Boston collage
Elizabeth Pezaris: Affiliation:
Norhtheastern university
Ann M. Gallagher: Affiliation:
Law School Admissions Council, Newton, PA
James C. Kaufman: Affiliation:
California State University, San Bernardino

Book contents

Get access

Summary

It is well known that there is a gender difference on a number of standardized mathematics tests, with males outperforming females (Hyde, Fennema, & Lamon, 1990; Willingham & Cole, 1997). In addition, a relationship has been found between spatial abilities and mathematics test scores (Burnett, Lane, & Dratt, 1979; Casey, Nuttall, Pezaris, & Benbow, 1995; Casey, Nuttall, & Pezaris, 1997; Geary, Saults, Liu, & Hoard, 2000; Robinson, Abbott, Berninger, & Busse, 1996). This relationship may be key for understanding gender differences in mathematics because one of the best-known and largest gender differences is the male advantage on some types of spatial skills (Linn & Petersen, 1985). In fact, evidence has begun to accumulate that shows a connection between gender differences in mathematics achievement and gender differences in spatial skills (Casey et al., 1995; Casey et al., 1997; Casey, Nuttall, & Pezaris, 2001).

In this chapter, we review our research findings, which were designed to address a series of questions to better understand gender differences in math achievement. We propose that gender differences in spatial skills are the key to understanding gender differences in math achievement. After presenting findings on this connection, the conclusion of the chapter provides a biological/environmental framework to help understand how variations in spatial abilities might arise.

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MATH ACHIEVEMENT

The observed gender differences in mathematics performance are not universal (Hedges & Nowell, 1995; Hyde et al., 1990).

Type: Chapter
Information: Gender Differences in Mathematics
An Integrative Psychological Approach
, pp. 121 - 142

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614446.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Association of University Women. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings on girls in education. Washington, DC: Author

Anderson, K., Casey, B., & Kerrigan, M. (2002). Froglets do the measuring. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill

Annett, M. (1985). Left, right, hand, and brain: The right shift theory. London: Erlbaum

Annett, M. (1995a). The right shift theory of a genetic balanced polymorphism for cerebral dominance and cognitive processing. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 14, 427–480Google Scholar

Annett, M. (1995b). The fertility of the right shift theory. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 14, 623–650Google Scholar

Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327–344CrossRef Google Scholar

Bassi, J. (2000). Block play: Exposing gender differences and predicting for math achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University, Boston

Battista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 47–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center, Boston College

Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1990). Differential aptitude tests (5th ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation

Bishop, D. V. M. (1990). Handedness and developmental disorder. Philadelphia: MacKeith Press

Brosnan, M. J. (1998). Spatial ability in children's play with lego blocks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 19–28CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Burnett, S. A. (1986). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: Are they trivial? American Psychologist, 41, 1012–1014CrossRef Google Scholar

Burnett, S. A., & Lane, D. M. (1971). Effects of academic instruction on spatial visualization. Intelligence, 4, 233–242CrossRef Google Scholar

Burnett, S. A., Lane, D. L., & Dratt, L. M. (1979). Spatial visualization and sex differences in quantitative ability. Intelligence, 3, 345–354CrossRef Google Scholar

Burton, L. (Ed.). (1986). Girls into maths can go. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston

Caldera, Y. M., Culp, A. M., O'Brien, M., Truglio, R. T., Alvarez, M., & Huston, A. C. (1999). Children's play preferences, construction play with blocks, and visual-spatial skills: Are they related? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23, 855–872CrossRef Google Scholar

Caplan, P. J., MacPherson, G. M., & Tobin, P. (1985). Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data. American Psychologist, 40, 786–799CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Casey, B. (2003). Mathematics problem-solving adventures: A language-arts based supplementary series for early childhood that focuses on spatial sense. In D. Clements, J. Sarama, & M. A. DiBaise (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Results of the conference on standards for pre-school and kindergarten mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates

Casey, B., Anderson, K., & Schiro, M. (2002). Layla finds secret patterns. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill

Casey, B., Goodrow, A., Schiro, M., & Anderson, K. (2002). Teeny goes to Shapeland. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill

Casey, B., Napoleon, I., Schiro, M., & Anderson, K. (2002). Seeking Mathapotamus. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill

Casey, B., Paugh, P., & Ballard, N. (2002). Sneeze the Dragon builds a castle. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill

Casey, M. B. (1996). Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework. Developmental Review, 16, 241–260CrossRef Google Scholar

Casey, M. B. (2002). Developmental perspectives on gender. In S. G. Kornstein & A. H. Clayton (Eds.), Women's mental health. New York: Guilford Press

Casey, M. B., & Brabeck, M. M. (1989). Exceptions to the male advantage on a spatial task: Family handedness and college major as a factor identifying women who excel. Neuropsychologia, 27, 689–696CrossRef Google Scholar

Casey, M. B., & Brabeck, M. M. (1990). Women who excel on a spatial task: Proposed genetic and environmental factors. Brain and Cognition, 12, 73–84CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R., Pezaris, E., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31, 697–705CrossRef Google Scholar

Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (1997). Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. Developmental Psychology, 33, 669–680CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (1999). Evidence in support of a model that predicts how biological and environmental factors interact to influence spatial skills. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1237–1247CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., & Pezaris, E. (2001). Spatial-mechanical reasoning skills versus mathematics self-confidence as mediators of gender differences on mathematics subtests using cross-national gender-based items. Journal for Reseach in Mathematics Education, 32, 28–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420–464). New York: Macmillan

Connor, J. M., & Serbin, L. A. (1977). Behaviorally based masculine- and feminine-activity-preference scales for preschoolers: Correlations with other classroom behaviors and cognitive tests. Child Development, 48, 1411–1416CrossRef Google Scholar

Erikson, E. H. (1951). Sex differences in the play configurations of preadolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 21, 667–692CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95–103CrossRef Google Scholar

Fuys, D. J., & Liebow, A. K. (1993). Geometry and spatial sense. In R. J. Jensen & S. Wagner (Eds.), Research ideas for the classroom: Early childhood mathematics (pp. 45–62). New York: Macmillan

Gallagher, A. M., DeLisi, R., Holst, P. C., McGillicuddy-DeLisi, , Morely, M., & Cahalan, C. (2000). Gender differences in advanced mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 165–190CrossRef Google Scholar

Geary, D. C., Saults, S. J., Liu, F., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 337–353CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1987). Cerebral lateralization. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press

Govier, E., & Feldman, J. (1999). Occupational choice and patterns of cognitive abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 99–108CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Hamilton, L. S., Nussbaum, E. M., Kupermintz, H., Kerkoven, J. I. M., & Snow, R. E. (1995). Enhancing the validity and usefulness of large-scale educational assessments: II. NELS:88 science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 555–581CrossRef Google Scholar

Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hershkowitz, R., Parzysz, B., & Van Dormolen, J. (1996). In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Labore (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Humphreys, L. G., Lubinski, D., & Yao, G. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 250–261CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139–155CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kalichman, S. C. (1988). Individual differences in water-level task performance: A component-skills analysis. Developmental Review, 88, 273–295CrossRef Google Scholar

Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women's math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198–214CrossRef Google Scholar

Li, C., Nuttall, R. L., & Zhao, S. (1999). The effect of writing Chinese characters on success on the water-level task. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 91–105CrossRef Google Scholar

Liben, L. S., & Golbeck, S. L. (1984). Performance on Piagetian horizontality and verticality tasks: Sex-related difference in knowledge of relevant physical phenomena. Developmental Psychology, 20, 595–606CrossRef Google Scholar

Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science achievement. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 67–101). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press

Lynn, R. (1992). Sex differences on the Differential Aptitude Test in British and American adolescents. Educational Psychology, 12, 101–106CrossRef Google Scholar

Marshall, S. P., & Smith, J. D. (1987). Sex differences in learning mathematics: A longitudinal study with item and error analyses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 372–383CrossRef Google Scholar

Masters, M. S., & Sanders, B. (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics, 23, 337–341CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics

Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113CrossRef Google Scholar

Parsons, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. R., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1980). Self-perceptions, task perceptions, and academic choice: origins and change. Washington, DC: Final Report to the National Institute of Education

Pezaris, E., Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., Bassi, J. C., Trzynski, M., Averna, S., & Galluccio, L. (1998). Style of block building in boys and girls and its relationship to their spatial and mathematical skills. Paper presented at the twenty-first annual mid-year meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Budapest, Hungary

Quaiser-Pohl, C., & Lehmann, W. (2002). Girls' spatial abilities: Charting the contributions of experiences and attitudes in different academic groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 245–260CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Robinson, N. M., Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Busse, J. (1996). The structure of abilities in math-precocious young children: Gender similarities and differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 341–352CrossRef Google Scholar

Robinson, N. M., Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., Busse, J., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (1997). Developmental changes in mathematically precocious young children: Longitudinal and gender effects. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 145–159CrossRef Google Scholar

Schiro, M., Casey, B., & Anderson, K. (2002). Tan and the Shape Changer. Chicago: The Wright Group/McGraw-Hill

Secada, W. G., Fennema, E., & Adajian, L. B. (Eds.). (1995). New directions for equity in mathematics education. New York: Cambridge University Press

Sherman, J. A. (1978). Sex-related cognitive differences. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas

Sholl, M. J. (1989). The relation between horizontality and rod-and-frame and vestibular navigational performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 110–125Google Scholar PubMed

Springer, S. P., & Deutsch, G. (1989). Left brain, right brain. New York: W. H. Freeman

Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press

Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 599–604CrossRef Google Scholar

Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wachs, T. D. (1992). The nature of nurture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

Wheatley, G. H. (1990). Spatial sense and mathematics learning. Arithmetic Teacher, 37, 10–11Google Scholar

Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 210–216CrossRef Google Scholar

Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Wittig, M. A., & Allen, M. J. (1984). Measurement of adult performance on Piaget's water horizontality task. Intelligence, 8, 305–313CrossRef Google Scholar

Wolfgang, C. H., Stannard, L. L., & Jones, I. (2001). Block performance among preschoolers as a predictor of later school achievement in mathematics. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15, 173–181CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

6 - Spatial Ability as a Mediator of Gender Differences on Mathematics Tests: A Biological–Environmental Framework

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive