Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:45:28.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2021

Ioanna Tourkochoriti
Ioanna Tourkochoriti
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Galway
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Freedom of Expression
The Revolutionary Roots of American and French Legal Thought
 , pp. 250 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People, vol. 1, Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. We the People, vol. 2, Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Adair, Douglas. “Experience Must Be Our Only Guide.” In Adair, Douglas and Colbourn, Trevor, eds. Fame and the Founding Fathers. Virginia: Institute of Early American History and Culture, 1974.Google Scholar
Adair, Douglas. “‘That Politics May Be Reduced to a Science’: David Hume, James Madison and the Tenth Federalist.” In Adair, Douglas and Colbourn, Trevor, eds. Fame and the Founding Fathers, 93–106. Virginia: Institute of Early American History and Culture, 1974.Google Scholar
Adams, John. “A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America.” In The Works of John Adams, vol. 4, 469–588, vol. 5, 3–478. Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1851.Google Scholar
Adams, John. Declaration of the Rights of the Inhabitants of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. In The Works of John Adams, vol. 4, 213–18. Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1851.Google Scholar
Adams, John. Novanglus. In The Works of John Adams, vol. 4, 15–177. Boston:Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1851.Google Scholar
Adams, John. The Report of a Constitution or Form of Government for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Preamble. In The Works of John Adams, vol. 4, 219–67. Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1851.Google Scholar
Adams, John. Thoughts on Government. In The Works of John Adams, vol. 4 , 189–207. Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1851.Google Scholar
Adams, Samuel. “The Rights of the Colonists: Report of the Committee of Correspondence to the Boston Town Meeting.” In Old South Leaflets, No. 173 (Boston: Directors of the Old South Work, 1906).Google Scholar
Allen, Danielle. Our Declaration: A Reading of the Declaration of Independence in Defense of Equality. New York: Norton 2014.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. America’s Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By. New York: Basic Books, 2012.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. “The Creation, Reconstruction and Interpretation of the Bill of Rights.” In Shain, Barry Alan, ed. The Nature of Rights at the American Founding and Beyond, 163–80. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Alféri, Pierre. Guillaume d’Ockham: le singulier. Paris: Minuit, 1989.Google Scholar
American Philosophical Society. Aspects of American Liberty, Philosophical, Historical and Political. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society ed., 1977.Google Scholar
Anderson, Alexis J. “The Formative Period of First Amendment Theory.” The American Journal of Legal History 24 (1980), 56–75.Google Scholar
Anderson, David. “The Origins of the Press Clause.” University of California Los Angeles Law Review 30 (1983), 455–541.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. London: Penguin Books, 1990 [1963].Google Scholar
Aristotle, . The Nicomachean Ethics. Revised Oxford translation, vol. 2. Edited by Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Politics. Revised Oxford translation, vol. 2. Edited by Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Armitage, David. The Declaration of Independence: A Global History. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Arneil, Barbara. John Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. Essai sur les libertés. Paris: Hachette, 1998 [1967].Google Scholar
Ashcraft, Richard and Goldsmith, M. M.. “Locke, Revolution Principles and the Formation of Whig Ideology.” The Historical Journal 26, no. 4 (1983), 773–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assemblée Nationale, Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860, vol. 8.Google Scholar
Assemblée Nationale, Rapport d’information fait en application de l’article 145 du réglement, no. 2262 (2010).Google Scholar
Aubenque, Pierre. “La loi chez Aristote.” Archives de Philosophie du Droit 25 (1980), 147–57.Google Scholar
Aubenque, Pierre. Le problème de l’être chez Aristote: essai sur la problématique aristotélicienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1962.Google Scholar
Aulard, François Alphonse. Le culte de la raison et le culte de l’être suprême (1793–1794): essai historique. Paris: F. Alcan, 1892.Google Scholar
Aulard, François Alphonse. “Les philosophes et la Révolution.” In Dide, Auguste, ed. La Révolution française: revue historique, 193–203. Paris: Siège de la Société de l’Histoire de la Révolution Française, 1892.Google Scholar
Aumètre, Jacques. “La Révolution: réalisation et révélation de la raison.” In Boulad-Ayoub, Josiane and Aumètre, Jacques, eds. Les Lumières et la Déclaration des droits de l’homme: rupture ou continuité?, 11–29. Québec: Presses de l’Université de Québec, 1990.Google Scholar
Austin, John. How to Do Things with Words? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Azouvi, François. Descartes et la France: histoire d’une passion nationale. Paris: Fayard, 2002.Google Scholar
Azouvi, François and Beyssade, Jean-Marie. “Descartes.” In Raynaud, Philippe et Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, 155–59. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar
Babeuf, Gracchus. Oeuvres de Babeuf, vol. 1, Babeuf avant la révolution. Edited by Daline, V., Saitta, A., and Soboul, A.. Paris: Bibliothèque Nationale, 1977.Google Scholar
Babeuf, Gracchus. Pages choisies de Babeuf. Edited by Dommanget, Maurice. Paris: Armand Colin, 1935.Google Scholar
Casali de Babot, Judith and Salvatierra, Guillermo. “Mably: utopie ou réalisme dans la pensée pré-révolutionnaire?” In Friedemann, Peter, Gauthier, Florence, Malvache, Jean-Luc, and Pepe, Fernanda Mazzani, eds. Colloque Mably: la politique comme science morale, vol. 1, 85–99. Bary: Palomar Casa Editrice, 1995.Google Scholar
Bailyn, Bernard. The Ideological Origins of The American Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Baker, C. Edwin. “Scope of the First Amendment Freedom of Speech.” University of California Law Review 25 (1978), 964–1040.Google Scholar
Baker, Keith Michael. “The Idea of a Declaration of Rights.” In Kley, Dale Van, ed. The French Idea of Freedom: The Old Regime and the Declaration of Rights of 1789,154–98. Stanford University Press, 1994,Google Scholar
Balibar, Étienne. “Dissonances dans la laïcité.” In Nordmann, Charlotte, ed. Le foulard islamique en questions, 5–27. Paris: ed. Amsterdam, 2004.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack. Living Originalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R. “The Compromised Republic: Public Purposelessness in America.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 19–38. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar
Barker, Ernest. “Edmund Burke et la Révolution française.” In Barker, E. et al., eds. La Révolution de 1789 et la pensée moderne, 1–32. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1940.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E. “James Madison’s Ninth Amendment.” In Barnett, Randy E., ed. The Rights Retained by the People: The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment, 1–49. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E. Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty. Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Barny, Roger. Les contradictions de l’idéologie révolutionnaire des droits de l’homme, droit naturel et histoire. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1993.Google Scholar
Barny, Roger. Le droit naturel à l’épreuve de l’histoire: Jean Jacques Rousseau dans la Révolution (débats politiques et sociaux). Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1995.Google Scholar
Barny, Roger. Prélude idéologique à la Révolution française: le rousseauisme avant 1789. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1985.Google Scholar
Barny, Roger. Le triomphe du droit naturel: La constitution de la doctrine révolutionnaire des droits de l’homme (1787–1789). Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1997.Google Scholar
Barret-Kriegel, Blandine. Les droits de l’homme et le droit naturel. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1989.Google Scholar
Barret-Kriegel, Blandine. L’État et les esclaves. Paris, Payot, 1989 [1979].Google Scholar
Beard, Charles. The Economic Interpretation of the Constitution. New York, MacMillan, 1913.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, Lucian and Jackson, Robert, Jr. “Corporate Political Speech: Who Decides?” Harvard Law Review 124 (2010), 83–117.Google Scholar
Becker, Carl. The Declaration of Independence. New York: Vintage Books, 1958.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. Another Cosmopolitanism. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. “Anarchical Fallacies: Being an Examination of the Declaration of Rights Issued during the French Revolution.” In Waldron, Jeremy, ed. Nonsense Upon Stilts: Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man, 46–76. London and New York: Methuen, 1987Google Scholar
Berghausen, Mark E. and Albertson, Skylar. “The Rise and Fall of the Separation of Powers.” Northwestern University Law Review 106 (2012), 527–50.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. , “John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life.” In Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Freedom.” In Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Berns, Walter. “Religion and the Founding Principle.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 178–79. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar
Bilder, Mary Sarah. The Transatlantic Constitution: Colonial Legal Culture and the Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Black, Jr., Charles L. “Foreword: State Action, Equal Protection, and California’s Proposition. Harvard Law Review 69 (1967), 69–262.Google Scholar
Bland, Richard. An Inquiry into the Rights of the British Colonies, Intended as an Answer to the Regulations Lately Made concerning the Colonies, and the Taxes Imposed upon Them Considered. Williamsburg: Alexander Purdie & Co., 1766.Google Scholar
Bloch, Ernst. Droit naturel et dignité humaine. Translated by Denis Authier and Jean Lacoste. Paris: Payot, 2002.Google Scholar
Böckenforde, Ernst-Wolfgang. “La naissance de l’État: processus de sécularisation.” In Le droit, l’État, et la constitution démocratique. Translated by Olivier Jouanjan, Willy Zimmer, and Olivier Beaud. Paris: Bruyland LGDJ, 2000.Google Scholar
Bodéüs, Richard. Le philosophe et la cité: recherches sur les rapports entre morale et politique dans la pensée d’Aristote. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1982.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean. Les six livres de la république. Paris: Jacques du Puys, Librairie Juré, 1576.Google Scholar
Bok, Sissela. Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. New York: Vintage, 1998.Google Scholar
Bollinger, Lee C. Images of a Free Press. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Boudon, Julien. Les Jacobins: une traduction des principes de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Paris: LGDJ, 2006.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Ce que parler veut dire: l’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard, 1982.Google Scholar
Bouretz, Pierre. “Egalité et liberté.” Droits 8 (1988), 71–82.Google Scholar
Bouretz, Pierre. La république et l’universel. Paris: Gallimard, 2000.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, Bernard. “Hegel.” In Raynaud, Philippe and Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, 267–74. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, Bernard. Philosophie et droits de l’homme, de Kant à Marx. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1990.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, Bernard. La raison moderne et le droit politique. Paris, Vrin, 2000.Google Scholar
Boutmy, Émile. “La Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen et M. Jellinek.” Annales des Sciences Politiques 17 (1902), 415–43.Google Scholar
Boutmy, Émile. Etudes de droit constitutionnel: France, Angleterre, Etats-Unis. Paris: Plon, 1888.Google Scholar
Bowen, John R. Why the French Don’t Like Headscarves. Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
BrennanJr., William. “The Constitution of the United States: Contemporary Ratification.” University of California Davis Law Review 19 (1985), 2–15.Google Scholar
Brest, Paul. “The Fundamental Rights Controversy: The Essential Contradictions of Normative Constitutional Scholarship.” Yale Law Journal 90 (1908–1981), 1063–109.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. On Conciliation with America. In The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, vol. 3. Edited by Langford., Paul Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the Revolution of France. In The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, vol. 8. Edited by Mitchell, L. G.. Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. Second Speech on Conciliation, 16 November 1775. In The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, vol. 3. Edited by Langford, Paul. Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Campbell, Jud. “Natural Rights and the First Amendment.” Yale Law Journal 127 (2017), 246–321.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. The Question of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Translated by Peter Gay. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius. L’institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Seuil, 1975.Google Scholar
Canavan, S. J., Francis, . “Thomas Paine.” In Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph, eds. History of Political Philosophy, 3rd ed., 685–86. University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Cayla, Olivier. “La notion de signification en droit: contribution à une theorie du droit naturel de la communication.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University Paris II, 1992.Google Scholar
Cayla, Olivier. “Rousseau Jean-Jacques, Du contrat social.” In Cayla, Olivier and Halpérin, Jean-Louis, eds. Dictionnaire des grandes oeuvres juridiques, 495–505. Paris: Dalloz, 2008.Google Scholar
Censer, Jack R. and Hunt, Lynn. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: Exploring the French Revolution. Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Chafee, Jr., Zechariah. “Freedom of Speech in Wartime.” Harvard Law Review 32 (1919), 932–73.Google Scholar
Chafee, Jr., Zechariah. Free Speech in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1941.Google Scholar
Chafee, Jr., Zachariah. How Human Rights Got into the Constitution. Boston University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Cobban, Alfred. The Social Interpretation of the French Revolution. Cambridge University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. “Freedom of Expression.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1993), 207–63.Google Scholar
Coisne, Martine and Collin, Jean. “Le droit de réponse dans la communication audiovisuelle.” In Jean-Yves, Dupeux and Alain, Lacabarats, eds. Liberté de la presse et droits de la personne, 17–30. Paris: Dalloz, 1997.Google Scholar
Commager, Henry Steele. The Empire of Reason. New York: Anchor Press and Doubleday, 1977.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marie-Jean-Antoine-Nicolas de Caritat, Marquis de. Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progrès de l’ésprit humain. Edited by Monique, and Hincker, François. Paris: Editions Sociales, 1966.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. “De la liberté des Anciens comparée à celle des Modernes” [1819]. In Écrits politiques. Edited by Gauchet, Marcel. Paris: Gallimard, 1997.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. Manuscrit des principes. In De la liberté chez les modernes. Edited by Gauchet, Marcel. Paris: Pluriel, 1980.Google Scholar
Corwin, Edward S. “The ‘Higher Law’ Background of American Constitutional Law.” In Barnett, Randy E., ed. The Rights Retained by the People: The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment, 67–106. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Courtney, Cecil P. “Burke et les Lumières.” In La Révolution française entre Lumières et Romantisme, 53–64. Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique, no. 16. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen, 1989.Google Scholar
Cowie, Jefferson. The Great Exception: The New Deal and The Limits of American Politics Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Curry, Thomas. The First Freedoms: Church and State in America to the Passage of the First Amendment. Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. “On Removing Certain Impediments to Democracy in the United States.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic., 234–56. University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar
DeCew, Judith Wagner. “The Scope of Privacy in Law and Ethics.” Law and Philosophy 5 (1986), 145–73.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard and Stefancic, Jean. Must We Defend Nazis? Hate Speech, Pornography and the New First Amendment. New York University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dellannoi, Gil. Éloge de la prudence. Paris: Berg International Editeurs, 1993.Google Scholar
Delannoy, Benjamin. Burke et Kant: interprètes de la Révolution française. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2004.Google Scholar
Dérathé, Robert. Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la pensée politique de son temps. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1950.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Declarations of Independence.” In Negotiations: Interventions and Interviews 1971–2001, 46–54. Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. De la grammatologie. Paris: Minuit, 1967.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Otobiographies: l’enseignement de Nietzsche et la politique du nom propre. Paris: Galilée, 1984.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Discours de la méthode. In Oeuvres et lettres. Collection Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. Paris: Gallimard, 1937.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. Characters and Events: Popular Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 2. Edited by Ratner., Joseph New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1929.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. “Liberalism and Civil Liberties.” The Social Frontier (February 1936), 137–38.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. Liberalism and Social Action. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1935.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. “Philosophy and Democracy.” In Political Writings, 38–47. Edited by Morris, D. and Shapiro, Ian. New York: Hackett, 1993.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. “Philosophies of Freedom.” In On Experience, Nature and Freedom, 271–72. Edited by Bernstein, Richard J.. Indianapolis/New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1960.Google Scholar
Diamond, Martin. “Ethics and Politics: The American Way.” In Horwitz, Robert H, ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 39–72. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar
Dinan, John J. The American State Constitutional Tradition. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2006.Google Scholar
Drury, S. B. “John Locke: Natural Law and Innate Ideas.” In Ashcraft, Richard, ed. John Locke, Critical Assessments, vol. 2, 84–97. London and New York: Routledge 1991.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon. Traité de droit constitutionnel, vols. 1 and 2. Paris: Ed. de Boccard, 1921.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. Essais sur l’individualisme. Paris: Seuil, 1985.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. Locke. Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by Lewis A. Coser. New York: The Free Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Karen E. Fields. New York: The Free Press 1995.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse: le système totémique en Australie. Paris: F. Alcan, 1912.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. Les constitutions de la France. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1944.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Edelman, Peter B. “Free Press v. Privacy: Haunted by the Ghost of Justice Black.” Texas Law Review 68 (1989–90), 1195–234.Google Scholar
Edling, Max. A Revolution in Favor of Government: Origins of the U.S. Constitution and the Making of the American State. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Elliot, Jonathan, ed. Debates in Several State Conventions On The Adoption Of The Federal Constitution, 5 vols. US Congress, 1836.Google Scholar
Emerson, Thomas. The System of Freedom of Expression. New York: Random House, 1970.Google Scholar
Emerson, Thomas. “The Affirmative Side of the First Amendment.” Georgia Law Review 15 (1981), 795–849.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. “A Taste for Privacy? Evolution and the Emergence of a Naturalistic Ethic.” Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1980), 665–81.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William and Ferejohn, John. A Republic of Statutes: The New American Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ewald, William. “Comparative Jurisprudence (I): What Was it Like to Try a Rat?” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143 (1995), 1898–2251.Google Scholar
Fallon, Jr., Richard. The Nature of Constitutional Rights: The Invention and Logic of Strict Judicial Scrutiny. Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel A. Retained by the People: The Silent Ninth Amendment and the Constitutional Rights Americans Don’t Know they Have. New York: Basic Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Farrand, Max, ed. The Records of The Federal Convention of 1787. 3 vols. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1911.Google Scholar
Favoureu, Louis. “La Déclaration de 1789 et le juge: une problématique américaine?” La Revue Tocqueville 14 (1993), 147–55Google Scholar
Favoureu, Louis. “La jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel et le droit de propriété proclamé par la Déclaration de 1789.” In La Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen et la jurisprudence. 125–50. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1989.Google Scholar
Favoureu, Louis and Philip, Loïc. Les grandes décisions du Conseil constitutionnel. 10th ed. Paris: Dalloz, 1999.Google Scholar
Faye, Emmanuel. Philosophie et perfection de l’homme: de la Renaissance à Descartes. Paris: Vrin, 1998.Google Scholar
Felcher, Peter L. and Rubin, Edward L.. “Privacy, Publicity, and the Portrayal of Real People by the Media.” Yale Law Journal 88 (1979), 1577–622.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Adam. “Of the Principles of Union among Mankind.” In Schneider, Louis, ed. The Scottish Moralists on Human Nature and Society, 77–89. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Ferry, Jean-Marc. “La rationalisation habermassienne de la prudence.” In Raynaud, Philippe et Rials, Stéphane, eds. Une prudence moderne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1992.Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc. “Actualité de la querelle de l’Aufklärung et du romantisme.” In La Révolution française entre Lumières et romantisme, 195–209. Cahiers de Philosophie Politique et Juridique, no. 16. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen, 1989.Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc. Le droit: la nouvelle querelle des Anciens et des Modernes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2007.Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc. “Kant.” In Furet, François et Ozouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: interprètes et historiens, 157–64. Paris: Flammarion, 2007.Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc and Renaut, Alain. Philosophie politique 3: des droits de l’homme à l’idée républicaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1992.Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc and Renaut, Alain. Système et critique: essais sur la critique de la raison dans la philosophie contemporaine. Bruxelles: Ousia, 1984.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Considérations destinées à rectifier les jugements du public sur la Révolution française, Translated by Jules Barni. Paris: F. Chamerot, 1859.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Foundations of Natural Rights According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre Translated by Michael Baur. Edited by Neuhouser, Frederick. Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. “Natural Law: The Classical Tradition.” In Coleman, Jules L., Himma, Kenneth Einar, and Shapiro, Scott J., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law, 1–60. Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, Samuel. “Adam Smith’s Reception among the American Founders, 1776–1790.” The William and Mary Quarterly 59 (2002), 897–924.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E. “Constitutional Welfare Rights: A History, Critique, and Reconstruction.” Fordham Law Review 69 (2001), 1821–91.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E. “The New Deal Constitution in Exile.” Duke Law Journal 51 (2001), 165–222.Google Scholar
Franz, Paul. “Unconstitutional and Outlawed Political Parties: A German-American Comparison.” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 5 (1982), 51–89.Google Scholar
Fraser, Steve. “The Labor Question.” In Fraser, Steve and Gerstle, Gary, eds. The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order, 1930–1980, 55–84. Princeton University Press,1990.Google Scholar
Frazer, Michael. The Enlightenment of Sympathy. Oxford University Press 2010.Google Scholar
Fried, Charles. Modern Liberty and the Limits of Government. New York: Norton and Company, 2007.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michel. Les droits de réponse. Paris: Editions du Centre de formation et de perfectionnement des journalistes, 1994.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J. and McCloskey, Robert G.. From the Declaration of Independence to the Constitution: The Roots of American Constitutionalism. New York: The Liberal Arts Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Fuller, Timothy. “Jeremy Bentham and James Mill.” In Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph, ed. History of Political Philosophy. 3rd ed., 710–31. University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Fuller, Timothy. “Thomas Hobbes and Emergent Modernity.” In McLean, Edward, ed. An Uncertain Legacy: Essays on the Pursuit of Liberty, 73–90. Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute 1997.Google Scholar
Furet, François. “Ancien Régime.” In Furet, François and Ozouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: idées, 39–40. Paris: Flammarion, 1992.Google Scholar
Furet, François. “Babeuf.” In Furet, François and Ouzouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: acteurs, 25–35. Paris: Flammarion, 1992.Google Scholar
Furet, François. “L’idée de république et l’histoire de France au XIXe siècle.” In Furet, François and Ozouf, Mona, eds. Le siècle de l’avènement républicain, 289–312. Paris: Gallimard, 1993.Google Scholar
Furet, François. “Jacobinisme.” In Furet, François and Ouzouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: idées, 241. Paris: Flammarion, 1992.Google Scholar
Furet, François. Penser la Révolution française. 2nd ed. Paris: Gallimard, 1978.Google Scholar
Furet, François. Marx et la Révolution française. Paris: Flammarion, 1986.Google Scholar
Furet, François and Ozouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: acteurs. 2nd ed. Paris: Flammarion, 2007.Google Scholar
Furet, François and Ouzouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: interprètes et historiens. Paris: Flammarion, 2007.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Hegel’s Philosophy and Its Aftereffects until Today.” In Reason in the Age of Science,21–37. Translated by Frederick G. Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Vérité et méthode. Translated by Pierre Fruchon, Jean Grondin, and Gilbert Merlio. Paris: Seuil, 1976.Google Scholar
Gardner, James A. Interpreting State Constitutions: A Jurisprudence of Function in a Federal System. University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. L’avènement de la démocratie, vol. 1, La révolution moderne. Paris: Gallimard, 2007.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. Le désenchantement du monde: une histoire politique de la religion. Paris: Gallimard, 1985.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. La religion dans la démocratie. Paris: Gallimard, 1998.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. La révolution des droits de l’homme. Paris: Gallimard, 1989.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. La révolution des pouvoirs: la souveraineté, le peuple et la représentation 1789–1799 Paris: Gallimard, 1995.Google Scholar
Gauthier, Florence. Triomphe et mort du droit naturel en Révolution, 1789–1795–1802. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1992.Google Scholar
Geer LeBoutillier, Cornelia. American Democracy and Natural Law. New York: Columbia University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Gengembre, Gerard. “Burke.” In Furet, François and Ouzouf, Mona, eds. Dictionnaire critique de la Révolution française: interprètes et historiens, 51–61. Paris: Flammarion, 2007.Google Scholar
Gengembre, Gérard. “La Contre-révolution et le refus de la Constitution.” In Troper, Michel and Jaume, Lucien, eds. 1789 et L’Invention de la Constitution, 55–74. Paris: LGDJ and Bruylant, 1994.Google Scholar
Gerber, Scott D. “Whatever Happened to the Declaration of Independence? A Commentary on the Republican Revisionism in the Political Thought of the American Revolution.” Polity 26 (1993), 207–31.Google Scholar
Gerstle, Gary. Liberty and Coercion: The Paradox of American Government from the Founding to the Present. Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Gewirtz, Paul. “Privacy and Speech.” Supreme Court Review (2001), 139–200Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto Friedrich von. Natural Law and the Theory of Society 1500 to 1800. Translated by Ernest Barker. Cambridge University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Robert, Glennon and Novak, John E. “A Functional analysis of the Fourteenth Amendment ‘State Action’ Requirement.” Supreme Court Review (1976), 221–61.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin 1990.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, M. M. “Liberty, Luxury and the Pursuit of Happiness.” In Pagden, Antony, ed. The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, 225–52. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, Victor. Anthropologie et politique: les principes du système de Rousseau. Paris: Vrin, 1974.Google Scholar
Gordon, Thomas and Trenchard, John. Cato’s Letters, or Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and other Important Subjects. 4 vols. New York: Da Capo Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Gouhier, Henri. Les méditations métaphysiques de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Paris: Vrin, 1984.Google Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, Simone. “La Déclaration des droits ou le devoir d’humanité: une philosophie de l’espérance.” Droits 8 (1988), 41–54.Google Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, Simone. John Locke et la raison raisonnable. Paris: Vrin, 1986.Google Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, Simone. “Les Lumières ont-elles préparé la Révolution?” La Révolution française entre Lumières et romantisme, 23–43. Cahiers de philosophie politique et luridique, no. 16. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen, 1989.Google Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, Simone. Politique et philosophie dans l’oeuvre de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2001.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark. Transforming Free Speech: The Ambiguous Legacy of Civil Libertarianism. Oakland: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. Fighting Words, Individuals, Communties and Liberties of Speech. Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. “Free Speech Justifications.” Columbia Law Review 89 (1989), 125–29.Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas. “Constitution as Scripture.” Stanford Law Review 37 (1984), 1–25.Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas. “Do We Have an Unwritten Constitution?” Stanford Law Review 27 (1974–75), 703–18.Google Scholar
Gross, Hyman. “The Concept of Privacy.” New York University Law Review 42 (1967), 34–54Google Scholar
Guenée, Bernard. States and Rulers in Later Medieval Europe. Translated by Juliet Vale. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.Google Scholar
Gusdorf, Georges. Naissance de la conscience romantique au siècle des Lumières. Paris: Payot, 1976.Google Scholar
Gusdorf, Georges. Les révolutions de France et d’Amérique: la violence et la sagesse. Paris: Librairie Académique Perrin, 1988.Google Scholar
Gusdorf, Georges. Les sciences humaines et la pensée occidentale, vol. 8, La conscience révolutionnaire des idéologues. Paris: Payot, 1978.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Haarscher, Guy. “Droits de l’homme.” In Raynaud, Philippe and Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, 190–97. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar
Haarscher, Guy. “Paradoxes de la liberté d’expression.” In Haarscher, Guy, ed. Les médias entre droit et pouvoir, 103–14. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 1995.Google Scholar
Haarscher, Guy. Philosophie des droits de l’homme. 4th ed. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 1993.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. De l’éthique de la discussion. Translated by Mark Hunyadi. Paris: Flammarion, 1991.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Morale et communication. Translated by Christian Bouchindhomme. Paris: Cerf, 1989.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Theory and Practice. Translated by John Viertel. Boston: Beacon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Philip. “Constitutional Right of Religious Exemption: An Historical Perspective.” George Washington Law Review 60 (1992), 914–48.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John, and Madison, James. The Federalist. Edited by Carey, George W and McClellan, James. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2001.Google Scholar
Hamowy, Ronald. “Jefferson and the Scottish Enlightenment: A Critique of Garry Wills’s Inventing America: Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence.” William and Mary Quarterly 36 (1979), 503–23.Google Scholar
Hampson, Norman. Will and Circumstance: Montesquieu, Rousseau and the French Revolution. London: Duckworth, 1983.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. “Are There Any Natural Rights?” Philosophical Review 64 (1955), 175–91.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1955.Google Scholar
Hassner, Pierre. “Georg W. F. Hegel.” In Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph, eds. History of Political Philosophy. 3rd ed., 732–60. University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hauriou, Maurice. Précis de droit constitutionnel. Paris: Sirey 1929.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich The Constitution of Liberty. University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. The Road to Serfdom. University of Chicago Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich. “Social or Distributive Justice.” In Nishiyame, Chiaki, Leube, Kurt R., eds. The Essence of Hayek, 62–99. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Elements of Philosophy of Right. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Introduction to the Philosophy of History. Translated by Leo Rauch. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, 1988.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. The Philosophy of History. Translated by J. Sibree. New York: Dover, 1956.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper and Row, 1962.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. “Human Dignity and Constitutional Rights.” In Meyer, Michael and Parent, William, eds. The Constitution of Rights: Human Dignity and American Values, 210–28. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. “Rights: American and Human.” Columbia Law Review 79 (1979), 405–25.Google Scholar
Heinze, Eric. Hate Speech and Democratic Citizenship. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hennette, Vauchez, Stéphanie. Disposer de soi. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2004.Google Scholar
Higonnet, Patrice. Sister Republics: The Origins of French and American Republicanism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hinsley, F. H. Sovereignty. London: C. A. Watts and Co. Ltd., 1966.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, Jack. “Privacy: Its Origin, Function and Future.” Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1980), 649–64.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. The Elements of Law: Human Nature and De Corpore Politico. Edited by Gaskin, J. C. A.. Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Tuck, Richard. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Hofstader, Richard. “The Founding Fathers: An Age of Realism.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 73–85 Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell. “The Path of the Law.” Harvard Law Review 10 (1897), 457–78.Google Scholar
D’Hondt, Jacques. De Hegel à Marx. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1972.Google Scholar
D’Hondt, Jacques. “Hegel et Napoléon.” In d’Hondt, Jacques, ed. Hegel et les Français,. New York: Georg Olms Verlag Hildesheim, 1998.Google Scholar
D’Hondt, Jacques. “Le Parcours hégélien de la Révolution française.” In d’Hondt, Jacques. Hegel et les Français, 139–54. New York: Georg Olms Verlag Hildesheim, 1998.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960. Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Robert. “John Locke and the Preservation of Liberty: A Perennial Problem of Civic Education.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 129–56. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar
Howe, Daniel Walker. The Political Culture of the American Whigs. University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hume, David. “Of the Liberty of the Press.” In Political Essays, 1–3. Edited by Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. “That Politics May Be Reduced to a Science.” In Political Essays, 4–15. Edited by Haakonssen, Knud. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. A System of Moral Philosophy. London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar
Hutson, James H. “The Emergence of the Modern Concept of a Right in America: The Contribution of Michel Villey.” In Shain, Barry Alan, ed. The Nature of Rights at the American Founding and Beyond, 25–42. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Huyler, Jerome. Locke in America: The Moral Philosophy of The Founding Era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995.Google Scholar
Hyppolite, Jean. “La signification de la Révolution française dans la “phénoménologie” de Hegel.” In Barker, E., et al., eds. La Révolution de 1789 et la pensée moderne, 193–224. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1940.Google Scholar
Jainchill, Andrew. Reigmagining Politics after the Terror: The Republican Origins of French Liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien. “Préface aux droits de l’homme.” In Jaume, Lucien, ed. Les déclarations des droits de l’homme (Du débat 1789–1793 au préambule de 1946), 27–65. Paris: Flammarion, 1989.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien. Le discours jacobin et la démocratie. Paris: Fayard, 1989.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien. L’individu effacé ou le paradoxe du libéralisme français. Paris: Fayard, 1997.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien. La liberté et la loi: les origines philosophiques du libéralisme. Paris: Fayard, 2000.Google Scholar
Jaurès, Jean. Histoire socialiste de la Révolution française. Paris: Jules Rouff, 1900.Google Scholar
Ingber, Stanley. “The Marketplace of Ideas: A Legitimizing Myth.” Duke Law Journal (1984), 1–91.Google Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel. “On Political Corruption.” Harvard Law Review 124 (2010), 118–42.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Edited by Boyd, Julian P., et al. Princeton University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. Political Writings. Edited by Appleby, Joyce and Ball, Terence. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. The Works of Thomas Jefferson. 12 vols. Edited by Ford, Paul Leicester. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1904–5.Google Scholar
Jellinek, Georg, La Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen: contribution à l’histoire du droit constitutionnel moderne. Translated by Georges Fardis. Paris: Albert Fontemoing, 1902.Google Scholar
Jennings, Jeremy. Revolution and the Republic: A History of Political Thought in France since the Eighteenth Century. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Jones, H. S. The French State in Question: Public Law and Political Argument in the Third Republic. Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Jouvenel, Bertrand de. De la souveraineté: à la recherche du bien politique. Paris: Génin, Librairie de Médicis, 1955.Google Scholar
Jourard, Sidney. “Some Psychological Aspects of Privacy.” Law and Contemporary Problems 31 (1966), 307–18.Google Scholar
Judt, Tony. “Rights in France.” La Revue Tocqueville 1 (1993), 67–108.Google Scholar
Kahn, Robert. Holocaust Denial and the Law: A Comparative Study. New York: Palgrave, 2004.Google Scholar
Kairys, David, ed. The Politics of the Law. New York: Basic Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Kalven, Harry. The Negro and the First Amendment. University of Chicago Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Kalven, Harry. “The New York Times Case: A Note on the Central Meaning of the First Amendment.” Supreme Court Review (1964), 191–221.Google Scholar
Kammen, Michael. A Machine That Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture. New York: Knopf, 1987.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’” In Political Writings, 54–60. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Edited by Reiss, H.. Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. “On the Common Saying: ‘This May be True in Theory, but it does not Apply in Practice.’” In Political Writings, 61–92. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Edited by Reiss, H.. Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Kant, Emmanuel. Le conflit des facultés en trois sections. Translated by J. Gibelin. Paris: Vrin, 1935.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Fondements de la métaphysique des moeurs. Translated by J. Barni. Paris: Librairie philosophique de Lagrange, 1848.Google Scholar
Kant, Emmanuel. Métaphysique des moeurs: deuxième partie: Doctrine de la vertu. Translated by Philonenko, Alexis. Paris: Vrin, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Emmanuel. Projet de paix perpétuelle. Translated by Jean Darbellay. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1958.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. On Perpetual Peace. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge University Press 1970.Google Scholar
Kant, Emmanuel, Théorie et pratique. Translated by Françoise Proust. Paris: GF-Flammarion, 1994.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst H. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Katz, Stanley N. “The American Constitution: A Revolutionary Interpretation.” In Beeman, Richard, Botein, Stephen, and Carter, Edward C. II, eds. Beyond Confederation: Origins of the Constitution and American National Identity, 23–37. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Making of Our Time. New York: Norton, 2014.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. Translated by Anders Wedberg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. “Justice et droit naturel.” In Le droit naturel: annales de philosophie politique III. Paris: Pressses Univeritaires de France, 1959.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. Reine Rechtslehre. Translated by Charles Eisenmann. Paris: LGDJ, 1999.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought. Washington, DC: Beard Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Kenyon, Cecelia M. “Constitutionalism in Revolutionary America.” In Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W, eds. Constitutionalism, NOMOS xx (1979), 84–120Google Scholar
Kenyon, Cecelia M. “The Declaration of Independence: Philosophy of Government in a Free Society.” In Aspects of American Liberty: Philosophical, Historical and Political, 114–25. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society 1977.Google Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl O. Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kessler, Jeremy. “The Early Years of First Amendment Lochnerism.” Columbia Law Review 116 (2016), 1915–2004.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael. The Framers’ Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James. Toward Democracy: The Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Thought. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James. Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought 1870–1920. New York: Oxford University Press 1986.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James. “The Virtues of Liberalism: Christianity, Republicanism, and Ethics in Early American Political Discourse.” The Journal of American History 74 (1987), 9–33.Google Scholar
Κοndylis, Panayotis. Περί Αξιοπρέπειας. Translation of the text “Würde” in Historisches Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland Geschichliche Grundbegriffe. Athens: Ίνδικτος,2000.Google Scholar
Krotoszynski, Ron. Privacy Revisited: A Global Perspective on the Right to be Left Alone. New York: Oxford University Press 2016.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Lacorne, Denis. “Le débat des droits de l’homme en France et aux Etats-Unis.” La Revue Tocqueville 14 (1993), 5–31.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. “Speech Acts and Unspeakable acts.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1993), 293–330.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. “Whose Right? Ronald Dworkin, Women and Pornographers.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 19 (1990), 311–59.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. “Rousseau.” In Raynaud, Philippe et Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, 687–95. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar
Laurence, Jonathan and Vaisse, Justin. Integrating Islam: Political and Religious Challenges in Contemporary France. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Charles R. “The Id, the Ego and Equal Protection: Reckoning with Unconscious Racism.” Stanford Law Review 39 (1987), 317–88.Google Scholar
Lebovic, Sam. Free Speech and Unfree News: The Paradox of Press Freedom in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Lecomte, Catherine. “Des dignités à la dignité.” In Fondations et naissances des droits de l’homme, vol. 1, L’odyssée des droits de l’homme. 159–66. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2003.Google Scholar
Lefort, Claude. L’Invention démocratique. Paris: Fayard, 1981.Google Scholar
Legros, Robert. “Hegel entre Lumières et romantisme.” In La Révolution française entre Lumières et romantisme. Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique, no. 16, 143–57. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen, 1989.Google Scholar
Leibniz Gottfried, Wilhelm. La monadologie. Paris: C. Delagrave, 1881.Google Scholar
Lerner, Ralph. “The Constitution of the Thinking Revolutionary.” In Beeman, Richard, Botein, Stephen, and Carter, Edward C. II, eds. Beyond Confederation: Origins of the Constitution and American National Identity, 38–68. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1987.Google Scholar
Lessay, Franc. “Burke et la nationalisation de la raison.” La Révolution française entre Lumières et Romantisme. Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique, no. 16. 65–82. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen, 1989.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. Constitutional Faith. Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Levy, Jean-Paul. “Pratique du droit de réponse dans la presse écrite et la communication audiovisuelle.” In Dupeux, Jean-Yves and Lacabarats, Alain, eds. Liberté de la presse et droits de la personne, 31–35. Paris: Dalloz, 1997.Google Scholar
Levy, Leonard. Emergence of a Free Press. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Levy, Leonard. Origins of the Bill of Rights. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lewis, Antony. Make No Law: The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment. New York: Vintage, 1991.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Anthony Handley. Some Political and Social Ideas of English Dissent, 1763–1800. Cambridge, 1938.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1996.Google Scholar
Lock, Geoffrey. “The 1689 Bill of Rights.” Political Studies 37 (1989), 540–61.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Essay on Human Understanding. Edited by Woolhouse, Roger. London: Penguin Books, 1997.Google Scholar
Locke, John. First Treatise of Government. In Two Treatises of Government. London: Thomas Tegg, 1823.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Letter concerning Toleration. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2010.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Questions Concerning the Law of Nature. Translated by Robert Horwitz and Jenny Strauss Clay. Edited by Diskin Clay. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Locke, John. The Second Treatise of Government. Edited by Wootton, David. London: Penguin Books, 1993.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. “The Constitutional Imagination.” The Modern Law Review 78 (2015), 1–25.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. Foundations of Public Law. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin. The Idea of Public Law. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Luchaire, François. Le juge constitutionnel en France et aux Etats-Unis: étude compare. Paris: Economica, 2002.Google Scholar
Mably, Gabriel Bonnot de. Des droits et des devoirs du citoyen. Paris: Librairie Marcel Didier, 1972.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Nicolo. Discourses. In The Historical, Political and Diplomatic Writings. Boston: James R. Osgood and Company, 1881.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. Towards A Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Madison, James. “Amendments to the Constitution” (speech of June 8, 1789). In A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774 – 1875, Annals of Congress, House of Representatives, 1st Congress, 1st Session.Google Scholar
Madison, James. The Writings of James Madison. 9 vols. Edited by Hunt, Gaillard. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1900–10.Google Scholar
Madison, James. The Papers of James Madison. Edited by Rutland, R. and Rachal, W.. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Maier, Pauline. American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1997.Google Scholar
Maier, Pauline. Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010.Google Scholar
Maistre, Joseph-Marie De. Considerations on France. Translated by Richard A. Lebrun. Montreal and London: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Malberg, Raymond Carré de. Théorie générale du droit et de l’Etat, vol. 1. Paris: Sirey, 1920.Google Scholar
Manent, Pierre. Cours familier de philosophie politique. Paris: Gallimard, 2001.Google Scholar
Manent, Pierre. Naissances de la politique moderne: Machiavel-Hobbes-Rousseau. Paris: Payot, 1977.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey. “Les formes de la liberté: le constitutionnalisme dans la pensée politique classique et moderne.” In Marshall, Terence, ed. Théorie et pratique du gouvernement constitutionnel: la France et les Etats-Unis, 23–33. La Garenne Colombes: Editions de l’Espace Européen, 1992.Google Scholar
Marcaggi, Vincent. Les origines de la Déclaration des droits de l’homme de 1789. Paris: Fontemoing, 1912.Google Scholar
Maron, Eugène. Histoire littéraire de la convention nationale. Paris: Poulet Malassis et de Broise, 1860.Google Scholar
Marshall, Terence. “Les droits de l’homme et la politique constitutionnelle: un dialogue franco-américain à l’époque révolutionnaire.” In Bourgeois, Bernard et D’Hondt, Jacques, eds. La philosophie et la Révolution française, 29–48. Paris: Vrin, 1993.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital, vol. 1. Translated by Ben Fowkes. New York: Vintage, 1977.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. “The Jewish Question.” In The Marx-Engels Reader, 26–52. Edited by Tucker, Robert. New York: Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. “The German Ideology.” In The Marx-Engels Reader, 146–200. Edited by Tucker, Robert. New York: Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
Mason, George. “Opposition to a Unitary Executive.” In Farrand, Max, ed. The Records of The Federal Convention of 1787, vol. 1. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1911.Google Scholar
Massey, Calvin R. The Ninth Amendment and the Constitution’s Unenumerated Rights Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. , et al., eds. Words that Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech and the First Amendment. London and New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar
Matthews, Richard K. If Men Were Angels: James Madison and the Heartless Empire of Reason. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995.Google Scholar
Mayaud, Yves. “L’abus de droit en matière de droit de réponse.” In Dupeux, Jean-Yves and Lacabarats, Alain, eds. Liberté de la presse et droits de la personne, 5–16. Paris: Dalloz, 1997.Google Scholar
Mazo, Eugene. “Regulating Campaign Finance through Legislative Recusal Rules.” In Kuhner, Timothy K. and Mazo, Eugene D., eds. Democracy by the People: Reforming Campaign Finance in America. Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Mazauric, Claude. Babeuf et la conspiration pour l’égalité. Paris: Editions Sociales, 1962.Google Scholar
Mazzanti Pepe, Fernanda. “Mably pour une démocratie à la mesure de l’homme.” In Friedemann, Peter, Gauthier, Florence, Malvache, Jean-Luc, and Mazzani Pepe, Fernanda, eds. Colloque Mably: la politique comme science morale, vol. 1, 65–83. Bary: Palomar Casa Editrice, 1995.Google Scholar
McCloskey, H. J. “The Political Ideal of Privacy.” Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1971), 303–14.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael W. “The Origins and Historical Understanding of Free Exercise of Religion.” Harvard Law Review 103 (1990), 1409–507.Google Scholar
McDonald, Forrest. Novus Ordo Seclorum: The Intellectual Origins of the Constitution. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1985.Google Scholar
McWilliams, Wilson Carey. “On Equality as the Moral Foundation for Community.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 183–213. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar
Meckstroth, Christopher. The Struggle for Democracy: Paradoxes of Progress and the Politics of Change. Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Meiklejohn, Alexander. “The First Amendment is an Absolute.” Supreme Court Review (1961), 245–66.Google Scholar
Meiklejohn, Alexander. “Free Speech and Its Relation to Self-Government.” In Political Freedom: The Constitutional Powers of the People. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press Publishers, 1979.Google Scholar
Meyer, Michael and Parent, William, eds. The Constitution of Rights: Human Dignity and American Values. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Michel, Alain. “La dignité humaine chez Cicéron.” In Magnard, Pierre, ed. La dignité de l’homme,17–24. Actes du Colloque tenu à la Sorbonne (Paris-IV). Paris: Honoré Champion, 1995.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank. “Possession v. Distribution in the Constitutional Idea of Property.” Iowa Law Review 72 (1987), 1319–50.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. “On Liberty.” In On Liberty and Other Essays. Edited by Gray, John. Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Milton, John. Areopagitica. Cambridge University Press, 1918.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha, “Equality and the Bill of Rights.” In Meyer, Michael and Parent, William, eds. The Constitution of Rights: Human Dignity and American Values, 118–28. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles Louis de Secondat Baron de. Oeuvres complètes de Montesquieu. Edited by Oster, D.. Paris: Seuil, 1964.Google Scholar
Morelly, Étienne-Gabriel. Code de la nature. Paris: Paul Masgana, 1841.Google Scholar
Mornet, Daniel. Les origines intellectuelles de la Révolution française 1715–1787. Paris: Armand Colin 1954.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Murrin, John M. “A Roof without Walls: The Dilemma of American National Identity.” In Beeman, Richard, Botein, Stephen, and Carter, Edward C. ii, eds. Beyond Confederation: Origins of the Constitution and American National Identity. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric. The Royalist Revolution: Monarchy and the American Founding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Nicolet, Claude. L’idée républicaine en France, 1789–1924. Paris: Gallimard, 1982.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Zur Genealogie der Moral. Translated by Eric Blondel, Ole Hansen Love, Théo Levdenbach, and Pierre Pénisson. Paris: GF Flammarion, 2000.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. Morality and Politics in Modern Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Ossipow, William and Gerber, Dominik. “The Reception of Vattel’s Law of Nations in the American Colonies: From James Otis and John Adams to the Declaration of Independence.” American Journal of Legal History 57 (2017), 521–55.Google Scholar
Otis, James. “A Vindication of the British Colonies.” In Samuelson, Richard, ed. Collected Political Writings of James Otis, 183–208. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2015.Google Scholar
Otis, James. “Essay on the Writs of Assistance Case” (Boston Gazette, January 4, 1762). In Collected Political Writings of James Otis, 15–18. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 2015.Google Scholar
Otis, James. The Rights of the British Colonies: Asserted and Proved. Boston and London:J. Almon, 1764.Google Scholar
Ozouf, Mona. L’homme régénéré. Paris: Gallimard, 1989.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. “The Rights of Man, Part I.” In Political Writings. Edited by Kuklick, Bruce. Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. “The Rights of Man, Part II.” In Political Writings. Edited by Kuklick, Bruce. Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1994.Google Scholar
Palmer, Robert R. The Age of the Democratic Revolution: A Political History of Europe and America, 1760–1800. Princeton University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Palmer, Robert R. “The European Enlightenment in Its American Setting.” In Aspects of American Liberty: Philosophical, Historical and Political, 47–55. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society, 1977.Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas L. The Spirit of Modern Republicanism: The Moral Vision of the American Founders and the Philosophy of Locke. University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Parent, William. “Constitutional Values and Human Dignity.” In Meyer, Michael and Parent, William, eds. The Constitution of Rights: Human Dignity and American Values, 47–72. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Parent, William. “A New Definition of Privacy for the Law.” Law and Philosophy 2 (1983), 305–38.Google Scholar
Patel, Kiran Klaus. The New Deal: A Global History. Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Pech, Lauren. La liberté d’expression et sa limitation: les enseignements de l’expérience américaine au regard d’expériences européennes (Allemagne, France et Convention européenne des droits de l’homme). Presses Universitaires de la Faculté de Droit de Clermont Ferrand, LGDJ, 2003.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, Pierre. “Aristote.” In Raynaud, Philippe et Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de Philosophie Politique, 28–36. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar
Peller, Gary. “The Metaphysics of American Law.” California Law Review 73 (1985), 1152–290.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Philonenko, Alexis. Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la pensée du malheur, 3 vols. Paris: Vrin, 1984.Google Scholar
Philonenko, Alexis. Théorie et praxis dans la pensée morale et politique de Kant et de Fichte en 1793. Paris: Vrin, 1968.Google Scholar
Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni. De la dignité de l’homme. Translated by Yves Hersant. Paris : Editions de l’Eclat, 1993.Google Scholar
Pincus, Steve. 1688: The First Modern Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Pincus, Steve. The Heart of the Declaration: The Founders’ Case for an Activist Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. “1776: The Revolution Against Parliament.” In Pocock, J. G. A., ed. Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1689, 1776. Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Polin, Raymond. La politique de la solitude: essai sur la philosophie politique de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Paris: Sirey, 1971.Google Scholar
Polin, Raymond. La politique morale de John Locke. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1960.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. “Epistemology without a Knowing Subject.” In Objective Knowledge,. Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Post, Robert. Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Post, Robert and Molnar, Peter. “Interview with Robert Post.” In Herz, Michael and Molnar, Peter, eds. The Content and Context of Hate Speech: Rethinking Regulation and Responses, 11–36. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Post, Robert and Shanor, Amanda. “Adam Smith’s First Amendment.” Harvard Law Review Forum 128 (2015), 165–82.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. “Mechanical Jurisprudence.” Columbia Law Review 8 (1908). 605–23Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. “Liberty of Contract.” Yale Law Journal 18 (1909), 454–87Google Scholar
Powe, Lucas A. The Warren Court and American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. A Discourse on the Love of Country 2nd ed. London: T. Cadell, 1789.Google Scholar
Primus, Richard. The American Language of Rights. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Primus, Richard. “An Introduction to the Nature of American Rights.” In Shain, Barry Alan, ed. The Nature of Rights at the American Founding and Beyond, 15–24. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Proudhon, Pierre Joseph. De la justice dans la Révolution et dans l’Eglise, vol. 1. Paris: Libraire de Garnier Frères, 1858.Google Scholar
Purdy, Jedediah. A Tolerable Anarchy: Rebels, Reactionaries and the Making of American Freedom. New York: Vintage, 2010.Google Scholar
Rabban, David. Free Speech in Its Forgotten Years. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rabban, David. “The Ahistorical Historian: Leonard Levy and Freedom of Expression in Early American History.” Stanford Law Review 37 (1985), 795–856.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack N. Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996.Google Scholar
Raynaud, Phillippe. “Anciens et Modernes.” In Raynaud, Philippe and Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar
Raynaud, Philippe. “Locke et les limites de la raison libérale.” In Raynaud, Philippe and Rials, Stéphane, eds. Une prudence moderne?, 21–33. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1992.Google Scholar
Raynaud, Philippe. “Lumières et Anti-lumières: de la Révolution française au romantisme politique.” In La Révolution française entre Lumières et romantisme. Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique, no. 16. 179–92. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen, 1989.Google Scholar
Raynaud, Philippe. “Révolution américaine.” In Raynaud, Philippe et Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, 669–76. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar
Raynaud, Philippe. “Révolution française.” In Raynaud, Philippe and Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique, 669–76. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar
Raynaud, Philippe. Trois révolutions de la liberté: Angleterre, Amérique, France. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2009.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Redlich, Norman. “Are there ‘Certain Rights retained by the People?’” In Barnett, Randy E., ed. The Rights Retained by the People: The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment, 127–47. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Reid, John Phillip. “The Authority of Rights at the American Founding.” In Shain, Barry Alan, ed. The Nature of Rights at the American Founding and Beyond, 258–79. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Reid, John Philip. The Concept of Liberty in the Age of the American Founding. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Reid, John Phillip. Constitutional History of the American Revolution: The Authority of Rights. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Renaut, Alain. Le système du droit: philosophie et droit dans la pensée de Fichte. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1986.Google Scholar
Rials, Stéphane. “La Déclaration de 1789: le mystère des origins.” Droits 8 (1988), 3–21.Google Scholar
Rials, Stéphane. La Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen. Paris: Hachette, 1988.Google Scholar
Rials, Stéphane. “Ouverture: généalogie des droits de l’homme.” Droits 2 (1985), 3–12.Google Scholar
Richards, David A. J. “Constitutional Liberty, Dignity, and Reasonable Justification.” In Meyer, Michael and Parent, William, eds. The Constitution of Rights, Human Dignity and American Values, 73–101. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Richards, David A. J. Foundations of American Constitutionalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Richards, David A. J. “Free Speech as Toleration.” In Waluchow, W. J., ed. Free Expression, Essays in Law and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. “The Erosion of Tolerance and the Resistance of the Intolerable.” In Ricoeur, Paul, ed. Tolerance Between Intolerance and the Intolerable, 189–201. Providence, RI: Bergahn Books, 1996.Google Scholar
Ritter, Joachim. Hegel et la Révolution française. Translated by Xavier Tilliette. Paris: Beauchesne, 1970.Google Scholar
Rivero, Jean. “Intervention in the Debate on ‘Les Libertés.’” In Favoureux, Louis, ed. La continuité constitutionnelle en France, de 1789 à 1989. Paris: Presses Universitaires d’Aix-Marseille, 1990.Google Scholar
Robbins, Caroline. The Eighteenth Century Commonwealthman: Studies in the Transmission, Development and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles III till the War with the Thirteen Colonies. New York: Atheneum, 1969.Google Scholar
Robbins, Caroline. “‘When It Is That Colonies May Turn Independent’: An Analysis of the Environment and Politics of Francis Hutcheson (1694–1746).” William and Mary Quarterly 11 (1954), 214–51.Google Scholar
Robespierre, Maximilien. Discours sur la liberté de la presse, prononcé à la Société des amis de la constitution le 11 Mai 1791. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1791.Google Scholar
Robespierre, Maximilien. “Discours sur la liberté de la presse.” In Oeuvres de Maximilien Robespierre, vol. 8. Edited by Bouloiseau, Marc, Lefebvre, Georges, and Soboul, Albert. Paris: Centre Nationale des Recherches Scientifiques, 2007.Google Scholar
Robespierre, Maximilien. “Discours sur les subsistances et le droit à l’existence.” In Discours pour le bonheur et pour la liberté. Edited by Bosc, Yannick, Gauthier, Florence, and Wahnich, Sophie. Paris: La Fabrique, 2000.Google Scholar
Robespierre, Maximilien. Oeuvres de Maximilien Robespierre. 10 vols. Edited by Bouloiseau, Marc, Lefebvre, Georges, and Soboul, Albert. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1958.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. La démocratie inachevée: histoire de la souveraineté du peuple en France. Paris: Gallimard, 2000.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le modèle politique français: la société civile contre le jacobinisme, de 1789 à nos jours. Paris: Seuil 2004.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Norman L. “Another World.” Reviews in American History 16 (1988), 554–59.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur l’économie politique. In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes. In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur les sciences et les arts. In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Du contrat social (première version, manuscrit de Genève). In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 3, 281–346. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Du contrat social. In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Emile. In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 4. Paris: Gallimard, 1969.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Lettres écrites de la montagne. In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 3. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Oeuvres complètes. 5 vols. Paris: Gallimard, 1959–95.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “On the Social Contract.” The Basic Political Writings. Translated by Donald A. Cress. Edited by Peter Gay. Indianapolis, Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Roy, Jean. “La ‘prérogative’ chez Locke.” In Goyard-Fabre, Simone, ed. La Pensée Libérale de John Locke, 149–55. Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique, no. 5. Centre de Publications de l’Université de Caen. 1984.Google Scholar
Rumble, Wilfrid E. “James Madison on the Value of Bills of Rights.” In Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W, eds. Constitutionalism: NOMOS xx (1979), 122–62.Google Scholar
Sadoun, Marc, ed. La démocratie en France 1: idéologies. Paris: Gallimard, 2000.Google Scholar
Saint-Just, Louis Antoine de. “Ésprit de la Révolution et de la Constitution de France.” In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 1. Paris: Charpentier et Fasquelle, 1908.Google Scholar
Saint-Just, Louis Antoine de. “Fragments sur les institutions républicaines.” In Oeuvres complètes, vol. 2. Paris: Charpentier et Fasquelle, 1908.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sartorius, Rolf, ed. Paternalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. Théorie de la démocratie. Paris: Armand Colin, 1973.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. “A Theory of Freedom of Expression.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, no. 2 (1972) 204–226.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. “Categories and the First Amendment: A Play in Three Acts.” Vanderbilt Law Review 34 (1981), 265–307.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. “Free Speech and The Social Construction of Privacy.” Social Research 68 (2001), 221–31Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. Free Speech: A Philosophical Inquiry. Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. “Uncoupling Free Speech.” Columbia Law Review 92 (1992), 1321–57.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. “The Exceptional First Amendment.” In Ignatieff, Michael, ed. American Exceptionalism and Human Rights, 29–56. Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Schivelbusch, Wolfgang. Three New Deals: Reflections on Roosevelt’s America, Mussolini’s Italy, and Hitler’s Germany, 1933–1939. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political. Translated by George Schwab. University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology. Translated by George Schwab. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Schneider, Louis, ed. The Scottish Moralists on Human Nature and Society. University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bernard, ed. The Bill of Rights: A Documentary History. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Paul M. “The EU-US Privacy Collision: A Turn to Institutions and Procedures.” Harvard Law Review 126 (2013), 1966–2009.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Paul M. and Solove, Daniel J. “Reconciling Personal Information in the United States and European Union.” California Law Review 102 (2014), 877–916.Google Scholar
Schwoerer, Lois G. “The Bill of Rights: Epitome of the Revolution of 1688–89.” In Pocock, J. G. A., ed. Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1688, 1776, 225–43. Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Scott, Austin. “Holmes v. Walton: The New Jersey Precedent.” American Historical Review 4 (1899), 456–60.Google Scholar
Seidman, Louis Michael and Tushnet, Mark V. “The State Action Paradox.” In Remnants of Belief, Contemporary Constitutional Issues, 49–71. Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Sellers, M. N. American Republicanism: Roman Ideology in the United States Constitution. London: MacMillan, 1994.Google Scholar
Sellers, M. N. The Sacred Fire of Liberty: Republicanism, Liberalism and the Law. London: MacMillan, 1998.Google Scholar
Shain, Barry. The Myth of American Individualism: The Protestant Origins of American Political Thought. Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Shain, Barry A. “Rights Natural and Civil in the Declaration of Independence.” In Shain, Barry Alan, ed. The Nature of Rights at the American Founding and Beyond, 116–62. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana. Speech Matters: On Lying, Morality, and the Law. Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. “Liberté positive: liberté négative en Amérique.” In Les usages de la liberté, 107–35. Neuchâtel: Ed. De la Baconnière, 1990.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. Men and Citizens: A Study of Rousseau’s Political Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Joseph Emmanuel. Ecrits politiques. Edited by Zapperi, Roberto. Paris: Editions des archives Contemporaines, 1985.Google Scholar
Sieyès, Joseph Emmanuel. Political Writings. Edited by Sonenscher, Michael. Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hackett, 2003.Google Scholar
Silier, Yildiz. Freedom: Political, Metaphysical, Negative and Positive. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1982.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. The Wealth of Nations, vol. 1. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1981.Google Scholar
Smith, Joseph Henry. Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations. New York: Columbia University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. Liberalism and American Constitutional Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Soboul, Albert. “Babeuf et le Babouvisme.” In Oeuvres de Babeuf, vol. 1, Babeuf avant la Révolution, 7–22. Edited by Daline, V., Saitta, A., Soboul, A.. Paris: Bibliothèque Nationale, 1977.Google Scholar
Solomon, Stephen D. Revolutionary Dissent: How the Founding Generation Created the Freedom of Speech. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Somos, Mark. American States of Nature: The Origins of Independence, 1761–1775. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedict. Tractatus Theologicophilosophicus. Translated by Jonathan Israel and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Spitz, Jean-Fabien. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau et les droits de l’individu.” In Cazzaniga, Gian Mario–Zarka, Yves Charles, eds. L’individu dans la pensée moderne XVIe–XVIIIe siècles, 659–74 Pisa: Edizioni, 1995.Google Scholar
Staël, Madame de. Considérations sur les principaux évenements de la Révolution Ffançaise. Paris: Delaunay Libraire, 1818.Google Scholar
Stern, Alfred. “Hegel et les idées de 1789.” In Barker, E. et al. La Révolution de 1789 et la pensée moderne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1940.Google Scholar
Stone, Geoffrey “Content Regulation and the First Amendment.” William and Mary Law Review 25 (1983), 189–252.Google Scholar
Stone, Geoffrey. Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime, From the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism. New York: Norton, 2005.Google Scholar
Stone, Geoffrey “Restrictions of Speech Because of its Content: The Peculiar Case of Subject-Matter Restrictions.” University of Chicago Law Review 46 (1987), 81–115.Google Scholar
Storing, Herbert and Murray, Dry, eds. The Complete Anti-Federalist. 7 vols. Chicago:University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Strauss, David A. “Persuasion, Autonomy, and Freedom of Expression.” Columbia Law Review 91 (1991), 334–71.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. Natural Right and History. University of Chicago Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Strayer, John. “The Rule of Law.” In Aspects of American Liberty, Philosophical, Historical and Political, 16–36. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society, 1977.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Kathleen M. “Two Concepts of Freedom of Speech.” Harvard Law Review 124 (2010), 143–77.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. “Free Speech Now.” In Stone, G., Epstein, R., and Sunstein, C., eds. The Bill of Rights in the Modern State, 255–316. University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. The Second Bill of Rights: FDR’s Unfinished Revolution and Why we Need it More than Ever. New York: Basic Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Taguieff, Pierre-Andre. La force du préjugé: essai sur le racisme et ses doubles. Paris: Gallimard, 1990.Google Scholar
Talmon, J. L. The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy. London: Penguin 1952.Google Scholar
Tarr, G. Alan. Understanding State Constitutions. Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law, and Church Law 1150–1625. Michigan: Eerdmans, 1997.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. L’Ancien Régime et la Révolution. Paris: Gallimard, 1967.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Translated by George Lawrence. Edited by J. P. Mayer. New York: Doubleday, 1969.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. De la démocratie en Amérique, vol. 2. Paris: Gallimard, 1961.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. “Discours prononcé à l’Assemblée constituante dans la discussion du projet de Constitution (12 September 1848), sur la question du droit au travail.” In Oeuvres complètes d’Alexis de Tocqueville, vol. 9, 536–52. Paris: Michel Lévy Frères, 1866.Google Scholar
Thompson, Martin P. “The History of Fundamental Law in Political Thought from the French Wars of Religion to the American Revolution.” The American Historical Review 91 (1986), 1103–28.Google Scholar
Tosel, André, ed. De la prudence des Anciens comparée à celle des Modernes: sémantique d’un concept, déplacement des problématiques. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1995.Google Scholar
Tosel, André. Kant révolutionnaire: droit et politique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1988.Google Scholar
Tourkochoriti, Ioanna. “Challenging Historical Facts and National Truths: An Analysis of Cases from France and Greece.” In Belavusau, Uladzislau and Grabias, Aleksandra Glyszczynska, eds. Law And Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History. Cambridge University Press, 2017. 151–74.Google Scholar
Tourkochoriti, Ioanna. “The Burka Ban: Divergent Approaches to Freedom of Religion in France and in the U.S.A.” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 20 (2012), 791–852.Google Scholar
Tourkochoriti, Ioanna. “Should Hate Speech be Protected: Group Defamation, Party Bans, Holocaust Denial and the Divide between Europe and the US.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 45 (2014), 552–622.Google Scholar
Tourkochoriti, Ioanna. “The Snowden Revelations: The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Divide Between US –EU in Data Privacy Protection.” University of Arkansas Law Review 36 (2014), 161–76.Google Scholar
Tourkochoriti, Ioanna. Speech, Privacy and Dignity in France and the USA. Loyola Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 40 (2016), 101–82.Google Scholar
Treanor, William Michael. “Judicial Review Before Marbury.” Stanford Law Review 58 (2005), 455–562.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence and Dorf., Michael C On Reading the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence. The Invisible Constitution. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Trigeaud, Jean-Marc. “Droit.” n Raynaud, Philippe and Rials, Stéphane, eds. Dictionnaire de philosophie politique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar
Trognon, Alain. “La Déclaration en tant qu’acte de discours.” In Borella, François, ed. Les valeurs de la Révolution devant la science actuelle, 79–96. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Nancy, 1990.Google Scholar
Troper, Michel. “La Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen en 1789.” In La Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen et la jurisprudence. Paris: Presses Universitaired de France, 1989.Google Scholar
Troper, Michel. “ Jefferson et l’interprétation de la Déclaration des droits de l’homme de 1789.” Revue Française d’Histoire des Idées Politiques 9 (1999), 3–23.Google Scholar
Troper, Michel. Terminer la Révolution: La Constitution de 1795. Paris: Fayard, 2006.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. Natural Rights Theories. Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. The Constitution of the United States of America: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart, 2015.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. “The Issue of State Action/Horizontal Effect in Comparative Constitutional Law.” In International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003), 79–98.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. “United States of America.” In Thiel, Markus, ed. The Militant Democracy Principle in Modern Democracies, 357–78. London: Routledge 2009.Google Scholar
Van Loan, Eugene M. “Natural Rights and the Ninth Amendment.” In Barnett, Randy E., ed. The Rights Retained by the People: The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment, 149–77. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de. The Law of Nations or Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns. English translation of French text. London: J. Newbery et al., 1760.Google Scholar
Vedel, Georges. “L’incorporation de la Déclaration de droits de l’homme dans la Constitution française.” La Revue Tocqueville 14 (1993), 157–63.Google Scholar
Villey, Michel. “Abrégé du Droit Naturel Classique.” Archives de Philosophie du Droit 5 (1960), 25–72.Google Scholar
Villey, Michel. Le droit et les droits de l’homme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1983.Google Scholar
Villey, Michel. La Formation de la Pensée Juridique Moderne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2003.Google Scholar
Voltaire. Toleration and Other Essays. Translated by Joseph McCabe. New York and London: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1912.Google Scholar
Wachsmann, Patrick. “Déclaration ou constitution des droits?” In Troper, Michel and Jaume, Lucien, eds. 1789 et l’invention de la Constitution, 44–54. Paris: LGDJ and Bruylant, 1994.Google Scholar
Wacks, Raymond. “The poverty of ‘Privacy.’” The Law Quarterly Review 96 (1980), 73–89.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Free Speech and the Menace of Hysteria.” The New York Review of Books 55 (May 29, 1998).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Karl Marx’s ‘On the Jewish Question.’” In Waldron, Jeremy, ed. Nonsense Upon Stilts: Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man, 119–36. London and New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. God, Locke and Equality. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Walton, Charles. Policing Opinion in the French Revolution: The Culture of Calumny and the Problem of Free Speech. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Walker Howe, Daniel. “Why the Scottish Enlightenment Was Useful to the Framers of the American Constitution.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 31 (1989), 572–87.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Laura. The Taming of Free Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Michael. A. “The Uses of Privacy in the Good Life.” In Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W., eds. NOMOS XIII. New York: Atherton Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Welch, Cheryl B. Liberty and Utility: The French Ideologues and the Transformation of Liberalism. New York: Columbia Press, 1984.Google Scholar
West, Thomas G. “Free Speech in the American Founding and in Modern Liberalism.” Social Philosophy & Policy 21, no. 2 (2004), 310–84.Google Scholar
West, Thomas G. The Political Theory of the American Founding: Natural Rights, Public Policy and the Moral Conditions of Freedom. Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Westbrook, Robert. John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Weulersse, Georges. La physiocratie à l’aube de la Révolution: 1781–1792. Paris: EHESS 1985.Google Scholar
Weulersse, Georges. La physiocratie sous les ministères de Turgot et de Necker (1774–1781). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1950.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward. “The First Amendment Comes of Age: The Emergence of Free Speech in Twentieth-Century America.” Michigan Law Review 95 (1996), 299–392.Google Scholar
White, Morton. The Philosophy of the American Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. “Consumerism versus Producerism: A Study in Comparative Law.” Yale Law Journal 117 (2007–8), 340–406.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. “Enforcing Civility and Respect: Three Societies.” Yale Law Journal 109 (2000), 1279–398.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. “Human Dignity’ in Europe and the United States: The Social Foundations.” In Nolte, Georg, ed. European and US Constitutionalism, 108–24. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. “The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Liberty versus Dignity.” Yale Law Journal 113 (2004), 1151–221.Google Scholar
Williams, Robert F. The Law of American State Constitutions. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Wills, Gary. Inventing America: Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence. (New York: Mariner Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Winterer, Caroline. American Enlightenment: Happiness in the Age of Reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. University of North Carolina Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. “The Democratization of Mind in the American Revolution.” In Horwitz, Robert H., ed. The Moral Foundations of the American Republic, 102–28. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1979.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon S. Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789–1815. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. “The History of Rights in Early America.” In Shain, Barry Alan, ed. The Nature of Rights at the American Founding and Beyond, 233–57. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Wood, Gordon. The Radicalism of the American Revolution. New York: Vintage, 1993.Google Scholar
Worms, Frédéric. “Introduction.” In Worms, Frédéric, ed. Droits de l’homme et philosophie: une anthologie, (1789–1914), 13–63. Paris: Agora, 1993.Google Scholar
Wright, B. F. “American Interpretations of Natural Law.” The American Political Science Review 3 (1926), 524–47.Google Scholar
Wright, J. K. “National Sovereignty and the General Will, The Political Program of the Declaration of Rights.” In Kley, Dale Van, ed. The French Idea of Freedom: The Old Regime and the Declaration of Rights of 1789, 199–233. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Yirush, Graig. Settlers, Liberty and Empire: The Roots of Early American Political Theory, 1675–1775. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Zackin, Emily. Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Places: Why State Constitutions Contain America’s Positive Rights. Princeton University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Zarka, Yves-Charles. “La notion de droit naturel dans la Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen de 1789.” In Bourgeois, Bernard and d’Hondt, Jacques, eds. La philosophie et la Révolution française, 59–67. Paris: Vrin, 1993.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael P. Natural Rights and the New Republicanism. Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael P. The Natural Rights Republic: Studies in the Foundation of the American Political Tradition. University of Notre Dame Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Ioanna Tourkochoriti, National University of Ireland, Galway
  • Book: Freedom of Expression
  • Online publication: 29 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042789.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Ioanna Tourkochoriti, National University of Ireland, Galway
  • Book: Freedom of Expression
  • Online publication: 29 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042789.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Ioanna Tourkochoriti, National University of Ireland, Galway
  • Book: Freedom of Expression
  • Online publication: 29 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042789.007
Available formats
×