Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T13:36:19.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The Family-Child-Care Mesosystem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Kathleen McCartney
Edited by
Alison Clarke-Stewart  and
Judy Dunn
Kathleen McCartney
Affiliation:
Harvard University, MA, U.S.
Alison Clarke-Stewart
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Judy Dunn
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Get access

Summary

The family's influence on individual differences in context is part of a larger question, an old question – older than developmental science: What is the role of experience in development? Consideration of the importance of any influence on development inevitably leads to considerations of nature and nurture, because these are the only two mechanisms that can explain individual differences in development. From the beginning, theorists have questioned whether the effects of experience can be isolated. In 1934, Gesell and Thompson concluded that nature and nurture could be separated “only in analytical thinking.” More recently, Gottlieb, Wahlsten, and Lickliter (1998) argued that attempts to separate the two were “nonsensical.” Yet, polarizing claims continue. One example is Harris's (1995) thesis that families do not matter. This conclusion was based primarily on the failure to find strong shared environmental effects for children's psychological development. Critiques of Harris's thesis have focused on the likelihood that family influences are largely not shared, because parents respond to individual differences among their children (Rutter, 2002; Vandell, 2000). The most promising research today on the family's influence concerns genotype-environment interplay, rather than research that promotes one over the other.

I have recently argued that theory and conceptualization in developmental science far exceed methodology (McCartney, 2003). This is hardly controversial. Behavior genetics and socialization methods are each limited, for reasons that are well known to developmentalists (Collins, Maccoby, Steinberg, Hetherington et al., 2000).

Type
Chapter
Information
Families Count
Effects on Child and Adolescent Development
 , pp. 155 - 176
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belsky, J., & Rovine, M. (1988). Nonmaternal care in the first year of life and the security of infant-parent attachment. Child Development, 59, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., & Steinberg, L. D. (1978). The effects of daycare: A critical review. Child Development, 49, 929–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benasich, A. A., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Clewell, B. C. (1992). How do mothers benefit from early intervention programs? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 13, 311–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, S. (1995). Maternal employment and children's academic achievement: Parenting styles as mediating variable. Developmental Review, 15, 212–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, D. M. (2001). The child care problem: An economic analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Bolger, K. E., & Scarr, S. (1995). Not so far from home: How family characteristics predict child care quality. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
Booth, C. L., Clarke-Stewart, K. A., Vandell, D. L., McCartney, K., & Owen, M. T. (2002). Child-Care usage and mother-infant “quality time.”Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, B. T. (1997). Preschool as family support. In Dunst, C. & Wolery, M. (Eds.), Advances in Early Education and Day Care (pp. 157–172). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Broberg, A. G., Wessels, H., Lamb, M. E., & Hwang, C. P. (1997). The effects of day care on the development of cognitive abilities in eight-year olds: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Towards an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, D. M., Burchinal, M., Lau, L. B., & Sparling, J. J. (1994). Family and classroom correlates of Head Start children's developmental outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 9, 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bub, K. L., & McCartney, K. (2004). On child care as a support for maternal employment. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 819–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchinal, M. R., Peisner-Feinberg, E., Bryant, D. M., & Clifford, R. (2000). Children's social and cognitive development and child-care quality: Testing for differential associations related to poverty, gender, or ethnicity. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, B. M., & Bradley, P. H. (1984). Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment. Little Rock:University of Arkansas.Google Scholar
Caughy, M. O., DiPietro, J. A., & Strobino, D. M. (1994). Day-care participation as a protective factor in the cognitive development of low-income children. Child Development, 65, 457–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (1989). Infant day care: Maligned or malignant? American Psychologist, 44, 266–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke-Stewart, K. A., Gruber, C., & Fitzgerald, L. (1994). Children at home and in day care. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Collins, W. A., Maccoby, E. E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2000). Contemporary research on parenting: The case of nature and nurture. American Psychologist, 55, 218–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cost, Quality, & Outcomes Team. (1995). Cost, Quality, and Child Outcomes in Child Care Centers. Denver CO: University of Colorado.
Agostino, R. B. Jr. (1998). Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2265–2281.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, G., & Gibson, C. (2000). Selection and attribution in the NICHD Childcare Study's analyses of the impacts of childcare quality on child outcomes. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
Dunham, P., & Dunham, F. (1992). Lexical development during middle infancy: A mutually driven infant-caregiver process. Developmental Psychology, 28, 414–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, B., Holloway, S. D., & Liang, X. (1995). Which families use nonparental child care and centers? The influence of family structure, ethnicity, and parental practices. Cambridge, MA: Department of Human Development and Psychology, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Gable, S., & Cole, K. (2000). Parents' child care arrangements and their ecological correlates. Early Education & Develoment, 11, 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Coll, C. T. (1990). Developmental outcome of minority infants: A process-oriented look into our beginnings. Child Development, 61, 270–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gesell, A., & Thompson, H. (1934). Infant behavior: Its genesis and growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gormley, W. T. Jr. (1995). Everybody's children: Child care as public problem. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, G., Wahlsten, D., & Lickliter, R. (1998). The significance of biology for human development: A developmental psychobiological systems view. In Lerner, R. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 233–274). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hagekull, B., & Bohlin, G. (1995). Day care quality, family and child characteristics and socioemotional development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 505–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofferth, S. L., & Wissoker, D. A. (1992). Price, quality, and income in child care choice. Journal of Human Resources, 27, 70–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, C. (1990). Can the age of entry into child care and the quality of child care predict adjustment in kindergarten? Developmental Psychology, 26, 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, C., & Stewart, P. (1987). Child's play with adults, toys, and peers: An examination of family and child-care influences. Developmental Psychology, 23, 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kammerman, S. B., & Kahn, A. J. (1995). Innovations in toddler day care and family support services: An international overview. Child Welfare, 74, 1281–1300.Google Scholar
Kontos, S., Howes, C., Shinn, M., & Galinsky, E. (1995). Quality in family child care and relative care. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, M. E. (1998). Nonparental child care: Context, quality, correlates, and consequences. In Damon, W. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 4 (pp. 73–133). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lamb, M. E., & Sternberg, K. J. (1990). Do we really know how day care affects children? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 11, 351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibowitz, A., Klerman, J. A., & Waite, L. J, (1992). Employment of new mothers and child-care choice: Differences by children's age. Journal of Human Resources, 27, 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCartney, K. (1984). Effect of quality of day care environment on children's language development. Developmental Psychology, 20, 244–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCartney, K. (2003). On the meaning of models: A signal amidst the noise. In Booth, A. & Crouter, A. C. (Eds.), Children's influence on family dynamics: The neglected side of family relations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McCartney, K., Dearing, E., & Taylor, B. A. (2003). Is higher-quality child care an intervention for children from low-income families? Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, Florida.
McCartney, K., & Galanopoulos, A. (1988). Child care and attachment: A new frontier the second time around. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 16–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCartney, K., & Phillips, D. (1988). Motherhood and child care. In Birns, B. & Hay, D. F. (Eds.), The different faces of motherhood: Perspectives in developmental psychology (pp. 157–183). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCartney, K., & Weiss, H. (in press). Data in a democracy: The evolving role of evaluation in policy and program development. In Aber, J. L., Bishop-Josef, S. J., Jones, S. M., McLearn, K. T. & Phillips, D. A. (Eds.). Child development and social policy: Knowledge for action. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
McCartney, K., Scarr, S., Phillips, D., Grajek, S., & Schwarz, J. C. (1982). Environmental differences among day care centers and their effects on children's development. In Zigler, E. F. & Gordon, E. W. (Eds.), Day care: Scientific and social policy issues (pp. 135–156). Boston: Auburn House.Google Scholar
McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Review, 114, 376–390.Google ScholarPubMed
Michel, S. (1999). Children's interests/mother's rights: The shaping of America's child care policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Newcombe, N. S. (2003). Some controls control too much. Child Development 74, 1050–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (1996). Characteristics of infant child care: Factors contributing to positive caregiving. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 269–306.CrossRef
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (1998). Relations between family predictors and child outcomes: Are they weaker for children in child care? Developmental Psychology, 43, 1119–1128.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2000a). The relation of child care to cognitive and language development. Child Development, 71, 960–980.CrossRef
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2000b). Characteristics and quality of child care for toddlers and preschoolers. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 116–135.CrossRef
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2001). Nonmaternal care and family factors in early development: An overview of the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 559–579.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2002). Early child care and children's development prior to school entry: Results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. American Education Research Journal, 39, 133–164.CrossRef
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2003). Does amount of time spent in child care predict socioemotional adjustment during the transition to kindergarten. Child Development, 74, 976–1005.CrossRef
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, & Duncan, G. (2003). Modeling the impacts of child care quality on children's preschool cognitive development. Child Development, 74, 1485–1506.
Ozer, E. M. (1995). The impact of childcare responsibility and self-efficacy on the psychological health of professional working mothers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., Burchinal, M. R., Clifford, R. M., Culkin, M. L., Howes, C., Kagan, S. L., & Yazejian, N. (2001). The relation of preschool child-care quality to children's cognitive and social developmental trajectories through second grade. Child Development, 72, 1534–1553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, D. A. (Ed.). (1995). Child care for low-income families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. A., Howes, C., & Whitebook, M. (1992). The social policy context of child care: Effects on quality. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 25–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, D., & McCartney, K. (in press). Lessons learned from the disconnect between research and policy on child care. In Pillemer, D. B. & White, S. H. (Eds.), Developmental psychology and the social changes of our time. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. A., Voran, M., Kisker, E., Howes, C., & Whitebook, M. (1994). Child care of children in poverty: Opportunity or inequality? Child Development, 65, 472–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roggman, L., Langlois, J., Hubbs-Tait, L., & Rieser-Danner, L. (1994). Infant day care, attachment, and the “file drawer problem.”Child Development, 65, 1429–1443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruopp, R., Travers, J., Glantz, F., & Coelen, G. (1979). Children at the cente. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (2002). Nature, nurture, and development: From evangelism through science toward policy and practice. Child Development, 73, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarr, S. (1984). Mother care, other care. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Scarr, S. (1985). Constructing psychology: Making facts and fables for our times. American Psychologist, 40, 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shonkoff, J. P. (2000). Science, policy, and practice: Three cultures in search of a shared mission. Child Development, 71, 181–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., Fuller, B., Keiley, M. K., & Wolf, A. (1998). Early child-care selection: Variation by geographic location, maternal characteristics, and family structure. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1129–1144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sroufe, L. A. (1988). A developmental perspective on day care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 3, 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symons, D. K., & McLeod, P. J. (1993). Maternal employment plans and outcomes after the birth of an infant in a Canadian sample. Family Relations, 42, 442–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandell, D. L. (2000). Parents, peer groups, and other socializing influences. Developmental Psychology, 36, 699–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandell, D. L., & Corasaniti, M. A. (1990). Variations in early child care: Do they predict subsequent social, emotional, and cognitive differences? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5, 555–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, L. J., Leibowitz, A., & Witsberger, C. (1991). What parents pay for: Child-care characteristics, quality, and costs. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisner, T. S., & Gallimore, R. (1977). My brother's keeper: Child and sibling caretaking. Current Anthropology, 18, 971–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissbourd, B. (1990). Family resource and supported programs: Challenges in human services. In Under, D. & Powell, D. (Eds.), Families as nurturing systems (pp. 157–174). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×