Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:24:29.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Diversity, conflict, and their consequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2010

By
Karen A. Jehn ,
Lindred L. Greer  and
Joyce Rupert
Edited by
Arthur P. Brief
Karen A. Jehn
Affiliation:
Professor of Social and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University Netherlands
Lindred L. Greer
Affiliation:
Leiden University
Joyce Rupert
Affiliation:
PhD student in Social and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University Netherlands
Arthur P. Brief
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In recent years, diversity has come to play a central role in organizational life, due to increased globalization, greater workforce diversity, and the increasing complexity of jobs (Williams and O'Reilly, 1998). Scholars have investigated the impact of diversity on organizational outcomes such as performance or satisfaction, but findings on these effects have been largely inconsistent (for reviews and meta-analyses see Jackson, Joshi, and Erhardt, 2003; Mannix and Neale, 2005; Stewart, 2006; Webber and Donahue, 2001; Williams and O'Reilly, 1998). To better understand how diversity impacts organizational groups, research began to examine the processes underlying the effects of diversity on performance (e.g., Jehn, Northcraft, and Neale, 1999; Pelled, Eisenhardt, and Xin, 1999). Conflict has arisen as a primary process in explaining the effects of diversity upon performance (cf. Williams and O'Reilly, 1998; Lau and Murnighan, 1998). This chapter reviews the literature relating diversity, conflict, and performance and then discusses the new directions the field is heading in.

We will begin by briefly reviewing the theory and findings on diversity's effect on group processes and performance. We will identify the trends found in these studies as well as identify areas of diversity research that have not received as much attention in recent reviews and meta-analyses. We will then expand on recent developments in the diversity field. Then, we will move to the conflict literature. We will describe the intra-group conflict literature as it now stands and then specify the new directions within that field.

Type
Chapter
Information
Diversity at Work , pp. 127 - 174
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acquino, K., Stewart, M. M., and Reed, A. (2005). How social dominance orientation and job status influence perceptions of African-American affirmative action beneficiaries. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 703–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alagana, S., Reddy, D., and Collins, D. (1982). Perceptions of functioning in mixed-sex and male medical training groups. Journal of Medical Education, 57, 801–803.Google Scholar
Amason, A. (1996). Distinguishing effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making, Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–148.Google Scholar
Ancona, D. G., and Caldwell, D. D. (1992). Demography and design, Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argote, L. Gruenfeld, D., and Naquin (2001). Group learning in organizations. In Turner, M. E. (ed.), Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research, 369–411. Mahwah: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1952). Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoko, O. B., and Hartel, C. E. J. (2003). The role of space as both a conflict trigger and a conflict control mechanism in culturally heterogeneous workgroups. Applied Psychology – An International Review, 52(3), 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bantel, K. A., and Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top management team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behfar, K. J., Mannix, E. A., Peterson, R. S., and Trochim, W. M. K. (2002). A multi-faceted approach to intragroup conflict issues of theory and measurement. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the International Association for Conflict Management, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Bernstein, D. A., Clarke-Stewart, A., Roy, E. J., and Wickens, C. D. (1997). Psychology, 4th edn. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bezrukova, K., and Jehn, K. (2006). Examining ethnic faultlines in groups: A multimethod study of demographic alignment, leadership profiles, coalition formation, intersubgroup conflict and group outcomes. Working Paper, Rutgers University.
Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., and Zanutto, E. (2002). A field study of group faultlines, team identity conflict, and performance in diverse groups. Working Paper. Wharton: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Blau, P. (1977). Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Boeker, W. (1997). Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 152–170.Google Scholar
Boulding, K. (1962). Conflict and Defense. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation, A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (2000). Reducing prejudice through cross-categorization: Effects of multiple social identities. In Oskamp, S. (ed.), Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination, 165–183. Mahwah: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., and Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and Intergroup Attitudes. East African Evidence. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Brief, A. P., Umphress, E. E., Dietz, J., Butz, R. M., Burrows, J., and Scholten, L. (2005). Community matters: Realistic group conflict theory and the impact of diversity. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 830–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunderson, J. S., and Sutcliffe, K. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 875–893.Google Scholar
Byrne, D. E. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carnevale, P. J., and Probst, T. M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1300–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, M. A., and Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 533–545.Google Scholar
Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G., and Neale, M. A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar. The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 749–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chattopadhyay, P. (1999). Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 273–287.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, P., Tluchowska, M., and George, E. (2004). Identifying the ingroup, A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 180–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, H-S., and Levine, J. M. (2004). Minority influence in work teams. The impact of newcomers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coser, L. (1965). The Functions of Social Conflict. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cox, T., Lobel, S., and McLeod, P. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 827–884.Google Scholar
Crisp, R. J., and Hewstone, M. (2001). Multiple categorization and implicit intergroup bias: Differential category dominance and the positive-negative asymmetry effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, J., and Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96(4), 608–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreu, C. K. W., Vries, N. K., Gordijn, , and Schuurman, (1999). Convergent and divergent processing of majority and minority arguments, effects on focal and related attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 329–348.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreu, C. K. W., and Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction, A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dooley, R. S., Fryxell, G. E., and Judge, W. Q. (2000). Belaboring the not-so-obvious: Consensus, commitment, and strategy implementation speed and success. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1237–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earley, P. C., and Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 26–49.Google Scholar
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. C., Roberto, M. A., and Watkins, M. D. (2003). A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: Managing unstructured task streams. Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 297–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K., Kahwajy, J., and Bourgeois, L. (1997). Conflict and strategic choice. How top management teams disagree. California Management Review, 39, 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., and Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, R. J. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationship among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 203–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, R. J., and Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work. The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evan, W. (1965). Conflict and performance in R&D organizations. Industrial Management Review, 7, 37–46.Google Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T., and Snavely, B. K. (1983). Majority and token minority group relationship. Power acquisition and communication. Academy of Management Review, 8, 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallois, C. (1994). Group membership, social rules, and power. A social- psychological perspective on emotional communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Prieto, P., Bellard, E., and Schneider, S. C. (2003). Experiencing diversity, conflict, and emotions in teams. Applied Psychology – An International Review, 52(3), 413–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C., and Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for learning team behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 202–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, L. L., and Jehn, K. A. (2005). Relationship and task conflict in e-mail. Performance effects moderated by verbal style and influence tactic usage. Presented at the International Association of Conflict Management, Seville, Spain.
Greer, L. L., and Jehn, K. A.(2007). The pivotal role of emotion in intragroup process conflict. In Mannix, E. A., Neale, M. A., and Anderson, C. P. (eds.), Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 10, 23–45, New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Greer, L. L., Jehn, K. A., and Thatcher, S. M. B. (2005). Trust, conflict, and faultlines. Paper presented at Trust Within and Between Organizations, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Greer, L. L., Jehn, K. A., and Thatcher, S. M. B.(2006). Demographic faultline token splits, Effects on conflict and performance. Presented at the Academy of Management, Atlanta.
Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y., and Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guetzkow, H., and Gyr, J. (1954). An analysis of conflict in decision making groups. Human Relations, 7, 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutek, B. A., and Morasch, B. (1982). Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzo, R., and Dickson, M. (1996). Teams in organizations, Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haley, H., and Sidanius, J. (2006). The positive and negative framing of affirmative action: A group dominance perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 656–668CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hambrick, D., Cho, T., and Chen, M. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., Li, J. T., Xin, K., and Tsui, A. S. (2001). Compositional gaps and downward spirals in international joint venture management groups. Strategic Management Journal, 22(11), 1033–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D., and Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelon, The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D. A., and Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, B., Price, K., and Bell, M. (1998). Beyond relational demography. Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96–107.Google Scholar
Harrison, B., Price, K., Gavin, J., and Florey, A. (2002). Times, teams, and task performance, Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in Organizations, The Social Identity Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Henry, P. J., Sidnaius, J., Levin, S., and Pratto, F. (2005). Social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and support for intergroup violence between the Middle East and America. Political Psychology, 26(4), 569–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, M. (1996). Social identity, self-categorization, and the small group. In Davis, J. and Witte, E. (eds.), Understanding Group Behavior, Vol. 2, 227–254. Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., and Abrams, D. (1988). Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., and Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, M. A., and Terry, D. J. (2001) Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts. Ann Arbor: Sheridan Books.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., Turner, J. C., and Davidson, B. (1990). Polarized norms and social frames of reference: A test of the self-categorization theory of group polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homan, A. C., Knippenberg, D. V., Kleef, G. A. V., and Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity, the effects of diversity beliefs on information elaboration and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189–1199.CrossRef
Hornsey, M. J., and Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity. An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. (1992). Team composition in organizations. In Worchel, S., Wood, W., and Simpson, J. (eds.), Group Processes and Productivity, 138–173. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., and Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5): 675 –689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. E., and Joshi, A. (2004). Diversity in social context: a multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(6), 675–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., and Erhardt, N. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity, SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S., May, E., and Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In Guzzo, R. and Slaas, E. Associates (eds.), Team Decision Making Effectiveness in Organizations, 204–261. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multi-method examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflicts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A.(1997). Qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A., and Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations, A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. In Staw, B. and Cummings, L. L., Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 189–244. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A., and Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations, A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A., Bezrukova, K., and Thatcher, S. M. B. (2006). Conflict, diversity and faultlines in workgroups. In Dreu, C. K. W. and Gelfand, M. J. (eds.), The Psychology of Conflict and Conflict Management in Organizations. Mahwah: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A., and Chatman, J. A. (2000). The influence of proportional and perceptual conflict composition on team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(1), 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jehn, K. A., and Conlon, D. (2006). Behind the music: Conflict and performance in punk rock bands. Working Paper, Leiden University.
Jehn, K. A., Greer, L. L., Rispens, S., Barreto, M., and Rink, F. (2006). The roots and effects of asymmetric group conflict. Presented at the Academy of Management, Atlanta.
Jehn, K. A., and Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict. A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238–251.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., and Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference. A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, R. (1977). Men and Women of the Organization. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Keck, S. L., and Tushman, M. L. (1993). Environmental and organizational context and executive team structure. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1314–1344.Google Scholar
Knight, D., Pearce, C. L., Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Smith, K. A., and Flood, P. (1999). Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 445–465.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. In Staw, B. and Cummings, L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 191–228. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Lau, D. C., and Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, D., and Murnighan, J. K. (2005). Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 645–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, B. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, S. (2004). Perceived group status differences and the effects of gender, ethnicity, and religion on social dominance orientation. Political Psychology, 25(1), 144–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, S., Federico, C. M., Sidanius, J., and Rabinowitz, J. L. (2002). Social dominance orientation and intergroup bias: The legitimation of favoritism for high-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 144–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, S., Henry, P. J., Pratto, F., and Sidanius, J. (2003). Social dominance and social identity in Lebanon: Implications for support of violence against the West. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6(4), 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, S., and Sidanius, J. (1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation?Political Psychology, x(1), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., and Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 794–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D., and Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 779–784.Google Scholar
Mannix, E. A., and Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsuo, M. (2006). Customer orientation, conflict, and innovativeness in Japanese sales departments. Journal of Business Research, 59, 242–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, J. D., and Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In Salovey, P. and Sluyter, D. J. (eds.), Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence, 3–31. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M., and Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Migdal, M. J., Hewstone, M., and Mullen, B. (1998). The effects of crossed categorization on intergroup evaluations: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. C., Burke, L. M., and Glick, W. H. (1998). Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives, implications for strategic decision process. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 39–58.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milliken, F. J., and Martins, L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammed, S., and Angell, L. C. (2004). Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups, examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 1015–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molleman, E. (2005). Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities, and personality traits, Do faultlines affect team functioning?Group Decision and Negotiation, 14, 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social Influence and Social Change. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Murray, A. I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemeth, C. J., and Kwan, J. L. (1987). Minority influence, divergent thinking and detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 788–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nibler, R., and Harris, K. L. (2003). The effects of culture and cohesiveness on intragroup conflict and effectiveness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 613–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., and Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turn over. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21–37.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, C. A., Snyder, R. C., and Boothe, J. N. (1993). Effects of organizational demography on organizational change. In Huber, G. P. and Glick, W. H. (eds.), Organizational Change and Redesign, 147–175. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, C., Williams, K., and Barsade, S. (1997). Group demography and innovation, Does diversity help? In Mannix, E. and Neale, M. (eds.), Research in the Management of Groups and Teams, Vol. 1. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes. An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 6, 615–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelled, L. H. (1997). Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance. A field investigation. International Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22(1), 54–67.Google Scholar
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., and Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box. An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. In Staw, B. and Cummings, L. (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 299–357. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, K. W. (2003). The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence, The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, K., Mannix, E., Neale, M., and Gruenfeld, D. (2004). Diverse groups and information sharing in groups: The effect of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 497–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., and Conway-Lanz, S. (1998). Social dominance orientation and the ideological legitimization of social policy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(20), 1853–1875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., and Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratto, F., Tatar, D. G., and Conway-Lanz, S. (1999). Who gets what and why: Determinants of social allocations. Political Psychology, 20(1), 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randel, A. E. (2002). Identity salience, a moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work group conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 749–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rau, D. (2005). The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory. Small Group Research, 36(6), 746–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riordan, C. M. (2000). Relational demography within groups. Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 19, 131–173.Google Scholar
Riordan, C., and Shore, L. (1997). Demographic diversity and employee attitudes. An empirical investigation of relational demographic within work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 342–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rispens, S., Greer, L. L., and Jehn, K. A. (2006). Can relationship conflict be positive? Exploring the moderating role of interdependence on the link between relationship conflict and workgroup performance. Presented at the International Association of Conflict Management Conference, Montreal, Canada.
Rispens, S., Jehn, K. A., and Thatcher, S. M. B. (2005). An examination of three perspectives on conflict in workgroups: Constructive debate, cognitive processing, and asymmetric perceptions. Paper presented at the Association for Researchers in Work and Organizational Psychology, The Netherlands: Rotterdam.
Ross, R. (1989). Conflict. In Ross, R. and Ross, J. (eds.), Small Groups in Organizational Settings, 139–178. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. B. (2004). The development and analysis of a measure of group faultlines. Organizational Research Methods, 7(1), 66–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., and Brief, D. (1995). Group dominance and the political psychology of gender: A cross-cultural comparison. Political Psychology, 16(2), 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Laar, C., and Levin, S. (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25(6), 845–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., and Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662–673.Google Scholar
Simsek, Z., Veijga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. J., and Dino, R. N. (2005). Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O'Bannon, D. P., and Scully, J. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1), 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, G. (1962). Tactics of lateral relationships. The purchasing agent. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. In Tajfel, H. (ed.), Differentiation between Social Groups, Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 61–76. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H.(1981). Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. and Austin, W. G. (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., and Zanutto, E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research, The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(3), 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and negotiation process in organizations. In Dunette, M. and Hough, L. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 651–718. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Tinsley, C. H. (2001). How negotiators get to yes, Predicting the constellation of strategies used across cultures to negotiate conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 583–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toren, N., and Kraus, V. (1987). The effects of minority size on women's position in academia. Social Forces, 65, 1090–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, A. M., and Scott, K. D. (2001). Team racial composition, member attitudes, and performance: A field study. Industrial Relations, 40(2), 317–337.Google Scholar
Triandis, H., Kurowski, L., and Gelfand, M. (1993). Workplace diversity. In Triandis, H., Dunette, M., and Hough, L. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 4, 769–827. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., and O'Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 549–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S., and O'Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-superordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402–423.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., and Egan, T. D. (1995). Relational demography: The missing link in vertical dyad linkage. In Jackson, S. and Ruderman, M. (eds.), Productivity and Interpersonal Relations in Work Teams Characterized by Diversity, 97–130. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S. (eds.), Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory, 42–67. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. R., and Blader, S. (2000). Co-operation in Groups, Procedural Justice, Social Identity and Behavioral Engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Vegt, , , G., and Bunderson, S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Knippenberg, D., and Haslam, S. A. (2003). Realizing the diversity dividend – exploring the subtle interplay between identity, ideology, and reality. In Haslam, S. A., Knippenberg, D., Platow, M., and Ellemers, N. (eds.), Social Identity at Work, Developing Theory for Organizational Practice, 61–77. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Vodosek, M. (2005). Cultural diversity, intragroup conflict, and group outcomes. Academy of Management Conference Proceedings, Honolulu, HI.CrossRef
Wagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., and O'Reilly, C. A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, J. A., and Callister, R. R. (1995). Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 21(3), 515–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, S. S., and Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance, a meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingart, L. R. (1992). Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 682–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, A. S. (1992). The social construction of gender and race in organizations, A social identity and group mobilization perspective. In Tolbert, P. S. and Bacharach, S. B. (eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 10, 55–84. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Wiersema, M., and Bantel, K. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 91–121.Google Scholar
Wiersema, M. F., and Bird, A. (1993). Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 996–1025.Google Scholar
Williams, K., and O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations, A review of 40 years of research. In Staw, B. and Cummings, L. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Inc.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. S., and Liu, J. H. (2003). Social dominance orientation and gender: The moderating role of gender identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittenbaum, G. M., and Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In Nye, J. L. and Brower, A. M (eds.), What's Social about Social Cognition? Social Cognition Research in Small Groups, 3–28. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Oullette, J. A., Buscene, S., and Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence, A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J. X., and Mossholder, K. W. (2004). Decoupling task and relationship conflict, the role of intragroup emotional processing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(5), 589–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zenger, T., and Lawrence, B. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communications. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 353–376.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×