Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:42:51.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Relativizing sociology: the challenge of cultural studies

from Part I - Resisting difference: the malaise of the human sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2010

Steven Seidman
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Albany
Get access

Summary

The relationship between sociology and cultural studies resists a simple or global description, whether it be one of antagonism or kinship. Nevertheless, I wish to emphasize the ways the latter challenges the former. I intend to do this for the purpose of relativizing sociology as a discourse of “the social.” Approaching sociology as a local practice, viewing its conceptual strategies and thematic perspectives as indicative of a particular tradition rather than as a universal language of the social, is, I am wagering, useful in that it allows us to become aware of the singular discursive organization of sociology, for example, to have its disciplinary silences and conventions exposed. I am to induce a certain critical disengagement from the culture of sociology in order to imagine new disciplinary possibilities for social knowledge. Perhaps such a “therapeutic” exercise might permit us to project other ways we might wish to frame “the self” and “the social.” If the therapeutic model is to be believed, it is only by making us aware of unconscious compulsions and unnecessary constraints that change is possible.

I intend then to play off “cultural studies” against “sociology” not to suggest that the former is better in the sense of right or true. I do not believe this. I do believe though that in figuring sociology as a local, not a universal practice, in reading its discursive conventions as a tradition (or multiple traditions) not the very language of the social universe, we gain a critical attitude towards this discipline. I am of the opinion that critique and change is especially pressing at this juncture in sociology's disciplinary history.

Type
Chapter
Information
Difference Troubles
Queering Social Theory and Sexual Politics
, pp. 61 - 80
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×