Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:54:52.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Constitutional Identity

Cracking the Genetic Code of the Constitution

from Part I - Foundations, Theory, and Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2024

By
Monika Polzin
Edited by
Ran Hirschl  and
Yaniv Roznai
Ran Hirschl
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Yaniv Roznai
Affiliation:
Reichman University, Israel
Get access

Summary

The chapter describes first the importance of Jacobsohn’s work to constitutional theory in general as it relies on the ideas of dynamism, fluidity, disharmony and imperfection to describe a constitution’s functioning. It then focuses on the German constitutional conflict on binding electoral gender quotas in order to illustrate the pertinence of his theory that describes so aptly the functioning of a constitution. It concludes with the finding that, in terms of constitutional theory, Jacobsohn has indeed cracked the genetic code of a constitution.

Keywords

constitutional identitydisharmonyGerman eternity clauseelectoral gender quotas
Type
Chapter
Information
Deciphering the Genome of Constitutionalism
The Foundations and Future of Constitutional Identity
 , pp. 34 - 43
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, John. 1776. ‘II. Letter to John Penn 27 March 1776’. Founders Online, National Archivs https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/06-04-02-0026-0003.Google Scholar
Burgmeister, Jörg and Greve, Holger. 2019. ‘Parité-Gesetz und Demokratieprinzip: Verfassungsauftrag oder Identitätsverstoß?’ Zeitschrift Für Gesetzgebung 34 (2): 154–173.Google Scholar
BVerfG, Judgement of 30 June 2009, 2 BvE 2/08 – Lisbon Judgement.Google Scholar
BVerfG, Order of 15 December 2020, 2 BvC 46/19 – Unsuccessful Electoral Complaint.Google Scholar
Calliess, Christian. 2020. ‘Constitutional Identity in Germany: One for Three or Three in One’. In Constitutional Identity in Europa of Multilevel Constitutionalism, edited by Calliess, Christian and von der Schyff, Gerhard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–181.Google Scholar
Deutscher Bundestag and Bundesarchiv (eds.). 2002a. Der Parlamentarische Rat 1948–1949, Akten und Protokolle, Vol. 13, Ausschuss für Organisation des Bundes/Ausschuss für Verfassungsgerichtshof und Rechtspflege. subvol. I. Oldenbourg: Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Deutscher Bundestag and Bundesarchiv (eds.). 2002b. Der Parlamentarische Rat 1948–1949, Akten und Protokolle, Vol. 13, Ausschuss für Organisation des Bundes/Ausschuss für Verfassungsgerichtshof und Rechtspflege. subvol. II. Oldenbourg: Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Di Fabio, Udo. 2018. ‘Staatsrechtler hält Gesetz für mehr Frauen im Parlament für verfassungswidrig’. Der Spiegel, December 28. www.spiegel.de/politik/deutsch/udo-di-fabio-gegen-frauenquoten-vorschlag-von-katarina-barley-a-1207777.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hohmann-Dennhardt, Christine. 2020. ‘Der Kampf geht weiter’. Verfassungsblog, July 17. https://verfassungsblog.de/der-kampf-geht-weiter/.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2010. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Klafki, Anika. 2020. ‘Parität – Der deutsche Diskurs im globalen Kontext’. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 73 (19): 856–866.Google Scholar
Laskowski, Silke. 2014. ‘Pro Parité: Ohne gleichberechtigte Parlamente keine gleichberechtigten Gesetze und keine gleichberechtigte Gesellschaft! Eine juristische Streitschrift für ein modernes Wahlrecht’. Zeitschrift des deutschen Jurisstinnenbundes 17 (3): 93–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. ‘Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”’. The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlok, Martin and Hobush, Alexander. 2019. ‘Ade parité? – Zur Verfassungswidrigkeit verpflichtender Quotenregelungen bei Landeslisten’. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 72 (1): 14–20.Google Scholar
Pernice-Warnke, Silvia. 2020. ‘Parlamente als Spiegel der Bevölkerung’. Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 135 (2): 81–90.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 2006. ‘Dealing with Difference: A Politics of Ideas or a Politics of Presence?’ in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. 2nd ed. Goodin, Robert and Pettit, Philip (eds.) Oxford: Blackwell, 171–182.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah F. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah F. 2004. ‘Representation and Democracy: Uneasy Alliance’. Scandinavian Political Studies 27 (3): 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polzin, Monika. 2019. ‘Parité-Gesetz in Brandenburg – Kein Sieg für die Demokratie’. Verfassungsblog, February 8. https://verfassungsblog.de/parite-gesetz-in-brandenburg-kein-sieg-fuer-die-demokratie.Google Scholar
Polzin, Monika. 2022. ‘Transnational Lists, Diversity and Quota Regulation’. EU Law Live, December 3. https://eulawlive.com/app/uploads/weekend_edition_123.pdf.Google Scholar
Redaktion des Landtages Brandenburg. 2020. ‘Landtagspräsidentin verteidigt Paritätsgesetz vor Verfassungsgericht – Landtag Brandenburg’. August 20. www.landtag.brandenburg.de/de/aktuelles/neuigkeiten/aktuelle_meldungen/landtagspraesidentin_verteidigt_paritaetsgesetz_vor_verfassungsgericht/12452.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2023 ‘Spain Announces Law Promoting Gender Parity in Politics and Business’. March 3. www.reuters.com/world/europe/spain-announces-law-promoting-gender-parity-politics-business-2023-03-04/.Google Scholar
Röhner, Cara. 2019. Ungleichheit und Verfassung. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubio-Marín, Ruth and Ruiz, Blanca Rodríguez. 2008. ‘The Gender of Representation: On Democracy, Equality and Parity’. International Journal Comparative Law 6 (2): 287–316.Google Scholar
Süssmuth, Rita, von Achenbach, Jelena, Brosius-Gersdorf, Frauke, Hohmann-Dennhardt, Christine, Jaeger, Renate, Laskowski, Silke, and Wapler, Friederike. 2020. ‘Es Gibt Keinen Besitzstandsschutz Im Wahlrecht’. Verfassungsblog, October 21. https://verfassungsblog.de/es-gibt-keinen-besitzstandsschutz-im-wahlrecht/.Google Scholar
Thür.VerfGH. 2020. Judgment. July 15. 2/20.Google Scholar
Thym, Daniel. 2012. ‘Attack or Retreat? Evolving Themes and Strategies of the Judicial Dialogue between the German Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice’. In Constitutional Conversations in Europe, edited by Claes, Monica, de Visser, Maartje, Popelier, Patricia and Van de Heyning., Catherine Cambridge, UK: Intersentia, 235–250.Google Scholar
Ungern-Sternberg, von Antje. 2019. ‘Parité-Gesetzgebung auf dem Prüfstand des Verfassungsrechts’. Juristenzeitung 74 (11): 525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VerfGBbg. 2020a. Judgment. October 23. 9/19.Google Scholar
VerfGBbg. 2020b. Judgment. October 23. 55/19.Google Scholar
Volk, Laura. 2022. Paritätisches Wahlrecht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×