
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Abbreviations
- PART I INTRODUCTORY
- PART II SPARSE CRITICISM
- Chapter 4 Austria: Endorsing the Convention System, Endorsing the Constitution
- Chapter 5 Belgium: Faithful, Obedient, and Just a Little Irritated
- Chapter 6 Czech Republic: Strasbourg Case Law Undisputed
- Chapter 7 Germany: The Long Way of Integrating the Strasbourg Perspective into the Protection of Fundamental Rights
- Chapter 8 Italy: Between Constitutional Openness and Resistance
- Chapter 9 Poland: The Taming of the Shrew
- Chapter 10 Sweden: European Court of Human Rights Endorsement with Some Reservations
- PART III MODERATE CRITICISM
- PART IV STRONG CRITICISM
- PART V HOSTILE CRITICISM
- PART VI SYNTHESIS
- APPENDIX
Chapter 7 - Germany: The Long Way of Integrating the Strasbourg Perspective into the Protection of Fundamental Rights
from PART II - SPARSE CRITICISM
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 December 2017
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Abbreviations
- PART I INTRODUCTORY
- PART II SPARSE CRITICISM
- Chapter 4 Austria: Endorsing the Convention System, Endorsing the Constitution
- Chapter 5 Belgium: Faithful, Obedient, and Just a Little Irritated
- Chapter 6 Czech Republic: Strasbourg Case Law Undisputed
- Chapter 7 Germany: The Long Way of Integrating the Strasbourg Perspective into the Protection of Fundamental Rights
- Chapter 8 Italy: Between Constitutional Openness and Resistance
- Chapter 9 Poland: The Taming of the Shrew
- Chapter 10 Sweden: European Court of Human Rights Endorsement with Some Reservations
- PART III MODERATE CRITICISM
- PART IV STRONG CRITICISM
- PART V HOSTILE CRITICISM
- PART VI SYNTHESIS
- APPENDIX
Summary
CRITICISM OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
In Germany, the system of the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights are not subject of widespread or fundamental criticism. The Convention system is not generally debated on. Mass media reports rather rarely on the Convention system or the European Court of Human Rights as such. The reform process is not a matter of general interest, and information about the reform process can only be found sporadically in the mass media.
Mass media reported on a couple of specific judgments of the European Court of Human Rights which touched sensitive questions such as religious freedom, the rights of homosexuals regarding marriage or the adoption of children or the decision to end life-sustaining measures. Sometimes, specific judgments concerning Germany lead to criticism, mainly by academia. This can be focused on the outcome of individual cases but also on the reasoning of the judgment itself or its consequences for the national legal order or influence on the national jurisprudence. However, the criticism regarding individual cases does not lead to hostile attitude against the European Court of Human Rights or the Convention system.
COUNTER-DYNAMICS AT THE POLITICAL LEVEL
POLITICS AND THE CONVENTION SYSTEM
In the following, an analysis of the election programmes of the main political parties in the political scene in Germany is provided in order to give an impression of the political positions held vis-a-vis the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms by the Convention system. As it is the most recent source, the analysis is founded on the election programmes presented before the nationwide parliamentary election in September 2013. After the election in 2013 the political parties “Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschland”/”Christlich Soziale Union Deutschland” (CDU/CSU) entered into a coalition with the “Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschland” (SPD) forming a so called “Große Koalition” (large coalition). By this, the former coalition consisting of the CDU/ CSU and the “Freie Demokratische Partei” (FDP) had been replaced.
The government programme of the party CDU/CSU mentioned the European Convention on Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights explicitly, but only at one occasion and very shortly. It proclaims that any attempt to weaken the Court has to be prevented.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Criticism of the European Court of Human RightsShifting the Convention System: Counter-dynamics at the National and EU Level, pp. 155 - 176Publisher: IntersentiaPrint publication year: 2016
- 1
- Cited by