When All Is Just a Click Away

doi:10.1017/9781108684354.010

Chapter 9 - When All Is Just a Click Away

Is Critical Thinking Obsolete in the Digital Age?

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 December 2019

Gerd Gigerenzer

Edited by

Robert J. Sternberg and

Diane F. Halpern

Show author details

Robert J. Sternberg: Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Diane F. Halpern: Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College, California

Book contents

Get access

Summary

What is critical thinking? To paraphrase the Enlightenment philosopher Immanuel Kant, it is the emergence from one’s self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one’s mind without another’s guidance. This inability is self-imposed if its cause lies not in the limits of one’s mind but in the lack of courage to use it independently, without others’ guidance. Yet, in the age of powerful algorithms that play better chess and Go than humans, recommend the music and books we like, predict criminal behavior, and even find us the ideal romantic partner, why would we still need to think critically? Would it not be more economical to cease wasting time on thinking and reflecting, and just click and like? I argue that we need more, not less, critical thinking in the digital age. I discuss several tools for critical thinking, including asking the right questions and detecting misleading statistics, and illustrate these by online dating sites, HIV tests, cancer diagnosis, big data predictive analytics, the Social Credit System, and more. Advances in technology require risk-literate people who can control digital media rather be controlled by it.

Keywords

AIDS counseling Bayes’ rule big data five-year survival rates Google flu trends HIV tests pancreatic cancer predictive policing natural frequencies single portals social credit system

Type: Chapter
Information: Critical Thinking in Psychology , pp. 197 - 223

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684354.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartiromo, M. (2009, December 3). Google CEO Eric Schmidt on privacy. Interview, CNBC. Online video clip. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6e7wfDHzew Google Scholar

Bauer, T. K., Gigerenzer, G., & Krämer, W. (2015, December 21). Unstatistik des Monats: Liebestrunken – Vermittlungsbörse schieß statisches Eigentor [Bad statistic of the month: Dating site makes a statistical foul]. Online. http://www.rwi-essen.de/unstatistik/50 Google Scholar

Bauer, T. K., Krämer, W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2017, April 28). Unstatistik des Monats: Eine Stunde joggen, sieben Stunden länger leben [Bad statistic of the month: One hour of jogging adds seven hours of life]. Online. https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/de/presse/dossiers/unstatistik-des-monats/archiv-zur-unstatistik Google Scholar

Brown, J. (2017, August 10) Why everyone is hating on IBM Watson, including the people who helped make it. Gizmodo. Online. https://gizmodo.com/why-everyone-is-hating-on-watson-including-the-people-w-1797510888 Google Scholar

Deutsches Institut für Service-Qualität (DISQ) (2017). Kundenbefragung: Online-Partnerbörsen 2017 [Customer survey: Online dating sites]. Online. https://disq.de/2017/20170426-Online-Partnerboersen.html Google Scholar

Dressel, J., & Farid, H. (2018). The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism. Science Advances, 4, eaao5580. DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aao5580CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Eddy, D. M. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 249–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Calculated risks: How to know when numbers deceive you. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2013). HIV screening: Helping clinicians make sense of test results to patients. British Medical Journal, 347, f5151. DOI:10.1136/bmj.f5151Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2014a). Risk savvy: How to make good decisions. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2014b). Breast cancer screening pamphlets mislead women. British Medical Journal, 348, g2636. DOI:10.1136/bmj.g2636CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gigerenzer, G. (2017a). Digital risk literacy: Technology needs users who can control it. Scientific American, 25. Online. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/will-democracy-survive-big-data-and-artificial-intelligence Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2017b). Can search engine data predict pancreatic cancer? British Medical Journal, 358, j3159. DOI:10.1136/bmj.j3159CrossRef Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107–143. DOI:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.xGoogle Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. W. (2007). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 53–96. DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.xGoogle Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684–704. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Ebert, A. (1998). AIDS counseling for low-risk clients. AIDS CARE, 10, 197–211. DOI:10.1080/09540129850124451Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1999). Overcoming difficulties in Bayesian reasoning: A reply to Lewis & Keren and Mellers & McGraw. Psychological Review, 106, 425–430. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.106.2.425CrossRef Google Scholar

Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi, M. H., Patel, R. S., Brammer, L., Smolinski, M. S., & Brilliant, L. (2009). Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature, 457(7232), 1012–1014. DOI:10.1038/nature07634Google Scholar

Gøtzsche, P. S., & Jørgensen, K. J. (2013). Screening for breast cancer with mammography (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 6, CD001877. DOI:10.1002/14651858Google Scholar

Hopkin, M. (2005, November 14). Experts urge caution on HIV ‘miracle recovery.’ Nature. DOI:10.1038/051114-3CrossRef Google Scholar

Jenny, M. A., Keller, N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2018). Assessing minimal medical statistical literacy using the Quick Risk Test: A prospective observational study in Germany. BMJ Open, 8:e020847. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020847CrossRef Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1784). Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung? Berlinische Wochenschrift, Dezember Heft 481–494.Google Scholar

Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G., & Vespignani, A. (2014). Big data. The parable of Google Flu: Traps in big data analysis. Science, 343(6176), 1203–1205. DOI:10.1126/science.1248506CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lea, S., Fischer, P., & Evans, K. (2009). The psychology of scams: Provoking and committing errors of judgement. Office of Fair Trading Report No. 1070. Online. https://tinyurl.com/y452jw47 Google Scholar

Lee, D., Brellenthin, A. G., Thompson, P. D., Sui, X., Lee, I., & Lavie, C. J. (2017). Running as a key lifestyle medicine for longevity. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 60(1), 45–55. DOI:10.1016/j.pcad.2017.03.005CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2003). Communicating statistical DNA evidence. Jurimetrics, 43, 147–163.Google Scholar

Markoff, J. (2016, June 7). Microsoft finds cancer clues in search queries. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/08/technology/online-searches-can-identify-cancer-victims-study-finds.html Google Scholar

Meyer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R., Konty, K. J., Paladini, M., Viboud, C., & Simonsen, L. (2013). Reassessing Google Flu Trends data for detection of seasonal and pandemic influenza: A comparative epidemiological study at three geographic scales. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(10), e1003256. DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003256CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Office of Fair Trading (2007). Research on impact of mass marketed scams: A summary of research into the impact of scams on UK consumers. Office of Fair Trading Report No. 883. Online. https://tinyurl.com/y4v2g35c Google Scholar

Paparrizos, J., White, R. W., & Horvitz, E. (2016). Screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma using signals from web search logs: Feasibility study and results. Journal of Oncology Practice, 12(8), 737–744. DOI:10.1200/jop.2015.010504Google Scholar

Prasad, V., Lenzer, J., & Newman, D. H. (2016). Why cancer screening has never been shown to “save lives” – and what we can do about it. BMJ, 352: h6080. DOI:10.1136/bmj.h6080Google Scholar

Prinz, R., Feufel, M., Gigerenzer, G., & Wegwarth, O. (2015). What counselors tell low-risk clients about HIV test performance. Current HIV Research, 13, 369–380. DOI:10.2174/1570162X13666150511125200Google Scholar

Royal Society for Public Health (2017). #StatusOfMind: Social media and young people’s mental health and wellbeing. Online. https://tinyurl.com/y99op9oj Google Scholar

Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 380–400. DOI:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.380CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen. New York: Atria Books.Google Scholar PubMed

UNAIDS (2018, September 17) World AIDS Day 2018 theme encourages everyone to know their HIV status. Online. http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/featurestories/2018/september/20180917_WAD_theme Google Scholar

US Preventive Services Task Force (2013). Pancreatic cancer: Screening. Final recommendation statement. Online. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/pancreatic-cancer-screening Google Scholar

US Preventive Services Task Force (2019a). Pancreatic cancer: Screening. Draft recommendation statement. Online. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/draft-recommendation-statement/pancreatic-cancer-screening1 Google Scholar

US Preventive Services Task Force (2019b). Screening for HIV infection: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 321(23), 2326–2336. DOI:10.1001/jama.2019.6587Google Scholar

Wegwarth, O., Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Gaissmaier, W., & Gigerenzer., G. (2012). Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156, 340–349. DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-156-5-201203060-00005Google Scholar

Welch, H. G., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2000). Are increasing 5-year survival rates evidence of success against cancer? JAMA, 283, 2975–2978. DOI:10.1001/jama.283.22.2975CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Yong, E. (2018, January 17). A popular algorithm is not better at predicting crimes than random people. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2018/01/equivant-compas-algorithm/55064`6 Google Scholar

Book contents

Chapter 9 - When All Is Just a Click Away

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive