Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:13:41.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Ethics Issues in Outsourcing to Emerging Markets: Theoretical Perspectives and Practices

from Part III - Normative and Utility Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2019

Onyeka Osuji
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Franklin N. Ngwu
Affiliation:
Pan-Atlantic University, Nigeria
Dima Jamali
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut
Get access

Summary

Offshoring has become a popular practice for multinational corporations (MNCs), with emerging markets being regarded as attractive locations. Although offshore outsourcing has economic benefits, it also involves several ethical issues, such as poor working conditions, child labour and environmental pollution. To identify implications for how to establish ethical practices in MNCs’ offshoring operations, we discuss theoretical perspectives (i.e., institutional, instrumental and normative) on MNCs’ motivations for being socially and environmentally responsible. Based on a review of these perspectives, this chapter provides practical guidelines for both MNCs and policymakers, including (1) re-designing governance, (2) establishing industry-level action and (3) developing institutional capacity. Developing both public (e.g., government regulation) and private (e.g., corporate code of conduct) governance mechanisms is important. Also, MNCs should take collective action at the industry level. Lastly, MNCs should provide resources and capacity to outsourcing companies and local communities to contribute to alleviating ethical concerns in emerging markets.

Type
Chapter
Information
Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing and Emerging Markets
Institutions, Actors and Sustainable Development
, pp. 336 - 347
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adobor, H. (2012). Ethical issues in outsourcing: The case of contract medical research and the global pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 239–55.Google Scholar
Bartley, T. (2007). Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labour and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology, 113(2), 297351.Google Scholar
Baumann-Pauly, D. Nolan, J. van Heerden, A. and Samway, M. (2017). Industry-specific multi-stakeholder initiatives that govern corporate human rights standards: Legitimacy assessments of the Fair Labor Association and the Global Network Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(4), 771–87.Google Scholar
Bondy, K. Moon, J. and Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, N. (1991). New directions in corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 34(4), 5665.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. and Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrigan, M. McEachern, M. Moraes, C. and Bosangit, C. (2017). The fine jewellery industry: Corporate responsibility challenges and institutional forces facing SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(4), 681–99.Google Scholar
Chang, Y. K. Oh, W. Y. and Messersmith, J. G. (2013). Translating corporate social performance into financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of high-performance work practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management24(19), 3738–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Y. K. Oh, W. Y. Park, J. H. and Jang, M. G. (2017). Exploring the relationship between board characteristics and CSR: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics140(2), 225–42.Google Scholar
de Vargas Mores, G. Finocchio, C. P. S. Barichello, R. and Pedrozo, E. A. (2018). Sustainability and innovation in the Brazilian supply chain of green plastic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–60.Google Scholar
Ding, H. Huang, H. and Tang, O. (2018). Sustainable supply chain collaboration with outsourcing pollutant-reduction service in power industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 215–28.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. and Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 6591.Google Scholar
Feng, Y. Zhu, Q. and Lai, K. H. (2017). Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 158, 296307.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. and Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3), 331–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimenez, C. and Sierra, V. (2013). Sustainable supply chains: Governance mechanisms to greening suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 189203.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G. and Lee, J. (2016). Economic and social upgrading in global value chains and industrial clusters: Why governance matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 2538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Perez, M. A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and international business: A conceptual overview. Advances in Sustainability and Environment, 11, 135.Google Scholar
Hiquet, R. Brunneder, J. and Oh, W. Y. (2018). Consumer acceptance of, and resistance to, fast fashion. In Heuer, M. and Becker-Leifhold, C., eds., Eco-friendly and fair: Fast fashion and consumer behaviour. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Husted, B. W. and Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 838–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamali, D. and Neville, B. (2011). Convergence versus divergence of CSR in developing countries: An embedded multi-layered institutional lens. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 599621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Javalgi, R. R. G. Dixit, A. and Scherer, R. F. (2009). Outsourcing to emerging markets: Theoretical perspectives and policy implications. Journal of International Management, 15(2), 156–68.Google Scholar
Ji, Y. Y. and Oh, W. Y. (2014). An integrative model of diffusion and adaptation of executive pay dispersion. Journal of Managerial Issues, 26(1), 7085.Google Scholar
Kostova, T. and Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 6481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langaas, M. D., Odeck, J. and Bjorvig, K. (2007). ‘The concept of institutional capacity building and review of road sector projects’, Paper presented to the 23rd PIARC World Road Congress, Paris, 17–21 September.Google Scholar
Li, X. and Zhou, Y. M. (2017). Offshoring pollution while offshoring production? Strategic Management Journal, 38(11), 2310–29.Google Scholar
Locke, R. Amengual, M. and Mangla, A. (2009). Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Politics & Society, 37(3), 319–51.Google Scholar
Lund-Thomsen, P. and Lindgreen, A. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in global value chains: Where are we now and where are we going? Journal of Business Ethics, 123(1), 1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marano, V. and Kostova, T. (2016). Unpacking the institutional complexity in adoption of CSR practices in multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 53(1), 2854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, F. and Gereffi, G. (2010). Regulation and economic globalization: Prospects and limits of private governance. Business and Politics, 12(3), 125.Google Scholar
Neate, R. (2014). Bangladesh factory collapse: Big brands urged to pay into help fund. The Guardian (24 February) available atwww.theguardian.com accessed 26 June 2018.Google Scholar
Ogunfowora, B. Stackhouse, M. and Oh, W. Y. (2018). Media depictions of CEO ethics and stakeholder support of CSR initiatives: The mediating roles of CSR motive attributions and cynicism. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, W. Y. and Barker III, V. L. (2018). Not all ties are equal: CEO outside directorships and strategic imitation in R&D investment. Journal of Management44(4), 1312–37.Google Scholar
Oh, W. Y., Chang, Y. K. and Kim, T. Y. (2018). Complementary or substitutive effects? Corporate governance mechanisms and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2716–39.Google Scholar
Oh, W. Y., Choi, K. J. and Chang, Y. K. (2015). A new perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility for MNEs: Real options theory. In Camillo, A., ed., Global enterprise management: New perspectives on challenges and future developments. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 107–20.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Rourke, D. (2014). The science of sustainable supply chains. Science, 344(6188), 1124–27.Google Scholar
Park, Y. R. Song, S. Choe, S. and Baik, Y. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in international business: Illustrations from Korean and Japanese electronics MNEs in Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 747–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulraj, A. Chen, I. J. and Blome, C. (2017). Motives and performance outcomes of sustainable supply chain management practices: A multi-theoretical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 239–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, E. R. G. and Gwozdz, W. (2014). From resistance to opportunity-seeking: Strategic responses to institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility in the Nordic fashion industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 245–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 5668.Google ScholarPubMed
Rathert, N. (2016). Strategies of legitimation: MNEs and the adoption of CSR in response to host-country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(7), 858–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G. and Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899931.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1995). Introduction: Institutional theory and organizations. In Scott, W. R. and Christensen, S., eds., The institutional construction of organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 1123.Google Scholar
Sheehy, B. (2015). Defining CSR: Problems and solutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 625–48.Google Scholar
Testa, F. Boiral, O. and Iraldo, F. (2018). Internalization of environmental practices and institutional complexity: Can stakeholders pressures encourage greenwashing? Journal of Business Ethics, 147(2), 287307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urry, J. (2014). Offshoring. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
van Hoof, B. and Thiell, M. (2014). Collaboration capacity for sustainable supply chain management: Small and medium-sized enterprises in Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production, 67, 239–48.Google Scholar
Van Huijstee, M. (2012). Multi-stakeholder initiatives: A strategic guide for civil society organizations. Centre for Research on Multinational Organisations, Amsterdam, www.somo.nl/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Multi-stakeholder-initiatives.pdf accessed 21 July 2019.Google Scholar
Venkatraman, N. V. (2004). Offshoring without guilt. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(3), 1416.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. (2007). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility, 2nd ed. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Vurro, C. Russo, A. and Perrini, F. (2009). Shaping sustainable value chains: Network determinants of supply chain governance models. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 607–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddock, S. A. Bodwell, C. and Graves, S. B. (2002). Responsibility: The new business imperative. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 132–48.Google Scholar
Xu, K. and Li, W. (2013). An ethical stakeholder approach to crisis communication: A case study of Foxconn’s 2010 employee suicide crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 371–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X. and Rivers, C. (2009). Antecedents of CSR practices in MNCs’ subsidiaries: A stakeholder and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 155–69.Google Scholar
Yin, J. and Jamali, D. (2016). Strategic corporate social responsibility of multinational companies subsidiaries in emerging markets: Evidence from China. Long Range Planning, 49(5), 541–58.Google Scholar
Young, S. and Thyil, V. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: Role of context in international settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 124.Google Scholar
Zhao, M. Tan, J. and Park, S. H. (2014). From voids to sophistication: Institutional environment and MNC CSR crisis in emerging markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 655–74.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×