The influence of new media

Nicholas Russell

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511803918.014

12 - The influence of new media

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2010

Nicholas Russell

Show author details

Nicholas Russell: Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

In the City of London there is a statue of a city trader 1980s style, a yuppie from the early years of deregulated financial markets. What marks him out as a figure from history is the brick-sized mobile phone clasped to his ear. The early cell phone was large, expensive, ostentatious and used by loud-mouthed young men to keep ‘in touch’ with office or trading floor. The devices (and their owners) proved a major irritant when used on commuter trains to activate their partners to pick them up from the station.

Then the phones began to shrink and got much cheaper. While their capacity to irritate did not decrease, their value for gossip increased sharply, especially when teenagers discovered text messaging. My class of Science Communication students circa 1996/97 marked an early stage in this transition of the mobile phone from braying yuppie accessory to necessary adjunct to social life. One young woman, after agonizing for weeks, decided it was worth investing in a mobile. There may have been other early adopters in her class, but the excitement caused by her decision suggests that many still found the idea of owning a mobile phone outrageous.

By 2000 it was unusual if a student did not have a mobile phone, two or three years more and most owned camera phones. Two or three years more and most of them could send photographs to their friends and on the most expensive services could get (not-too-good) internet access. By late 2008 so-called 3G (third-generation) phones were the norm as universal communication and data-processing devices; simultaneously phones, cameras, video cameras, MP3 audio players, text-generators, e-mail and internet accessible. […]

Type: Chapter
Information: Communicating Science
Professional, Popular, Literary
, pp. 161 - 171

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803918.014 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berners-Lee, T. and Fischetti, M. (1999). Weaving the Web. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Burkeman, O. (2005). The new commentariat. The Guardian, 17 November, 8–15.Google Scholar

Connon, H. (2001). Phone giants' brave new world still disconnected. The Observer, Business Section, 4 March 2001.Google Scholar

Garfield, G. (2004). New kids on the blog. The Observer, Review Section, 4 April, 1–2.Google Scholar

Garfield, G. (2006). How to make 80 million friends and influence people. The Observer, Review Section, 18 June, 6–8.Google Scholar

Gibson, O. (2002). Broad but not so deep. The Guardian, Media Section, 4 March, 38–9.Google Scholar PubMed

Gibson, O. (2005). The bloggers have all the best news. The Guardian, Media Section, 6 June, 12–13.Google Scholar

Gibson, O. (2005). The man who put teenagers' lives online. The Guardian, Media Section, 3 July, 5.Google Scholar

Gillies, J. and Cailliau, R. (2000). How the Web was Born. The Story of the World Wide Web. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hammersley, B. (2004). Audible revolution. The Guardian, Online Section, 12 February, 27–8.Google Scholar

Hafner, K. and Lyon, M. (1996). When Wizards Stay up Late: the Origins of the Internet. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Hargrave, S. (2004). The blog busters. The Guardian, Media Section, 9 August.Google Scholar

,House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (2000). Tenth report, http://www.pulbications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/399/39903.htm, visited 25 October 2004.Google Scholar

Mansell, R. (2002). Where all citizens should be free to meet. Times Higher Education Supplement, 22 February, 17–18.Google Scholar

Martinson, J. (1999). Sleeping with the enemy. The Guardian, Media Section, 22 November, 6–7.Google Scholar

Mattin, D. (2005). We are changing the nature of news. The Guardian, Media Section, 15 August, 10.Google Scholar

McClellan, J. (2003). Newbiz on the blog. The Guardian, Online Section, 30 January, 1–3.Google Scholar

McIntosh, N. (2002). The 3G roll out begins. The Guardian, Online Section, 10 October, 1–3.

Moody, G. (2004). Dambusters. The Guardian, Online Section, 11 November, 23–4.Google Scholar

Moody, G. (2004). Risk-free rebellion. The Guardian, Online Section, 11 November, 19.Google Scholar

Naughton, J. (1999). A Brief History of the Future: The Origins of the Internet. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Paton, M. (2001). The word in his attic. The Guardian, Media Section, 15 October.Google Scholar

Pearse, J. (2003). Content rules at 3GSN. New Media Age, 6 March, 22.Google Scholar

Schofield, J. (2004). Hacks of all trades. The Guardian, Online Section, 22 July, 23–4.Google Scholar

Seenan, G. (2004). Forget the bloggers, it's the vloggers showing the way on the internet. The Guardian, 7 August, 11.Google Scholar

Wadman, W. (2001). Publishers challenged over access to papers. Nature, 410, 29 March, 502.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Waldman, S. (1999). Stop the presses …The Guardian, Media Section, 11 January, 6–7.Google Scholar

Waldman, S. (2004). Who knows?The Guardian, G2 Section, 26 October, 2–3.Google Scholar

Book contents

12 - The influence of new media

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive