Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:19:13.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2019

José Guilherme Moreno Caiado
José Guilherme Moreno Caiado
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Commitments and Flexibilities in the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
An Economically Informed Analysis
 , pp. 233 - 243
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, KW and others, “The Concept of Legalization” (2000) 54 International Organization p. 401–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D, “Transaction Costs” (1999) 14 Research in Law and EconomicsGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R, Ezell, S, and Wein, M, Localization Barriers to Trade: Threat to the Global Innovation Economy (Information Technology and Innovation Foundation 2013)Google Scholar
Ayala, FA and Gallagher, K, Preserving Policy Space for Sustainable Development: The Subsidies Agreement at the WTO (International Institute for Sustainable Development 2005)Google Scholar
Bacchetta, M and Ruta, M (eds), The WTO, Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, vol 19 (Critical Perspectives on the Global Trading System and the WTO, Edward Elgar 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeumler, J, Caiado, J, and DeRemer, D, “How Do the WTO Articles on Actionable Subsidies Function as Liability Rules?” (Unpublished paper 2014)Google Scholar
Bagwell, K and Mavroidis, P, “Too Much, Too Little, … Too Late?” in Bagwell, K and others (eds), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade (Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade, Cambridge University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Bagwell, K and Staiger, RW, “Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System?” (2006) The American Economic Review p.877–95Google Scholar
Bagwell, K and Staiger, RW, “An Economic Theory of GATT” (1999) 89 The American Economic Review p. 215–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K and Staiger, RW, “The Role of Export Subsidies When Product Quality Is Unknown” (1989) 27 Journal of International Economics p. 69–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R, “Politically Realistic Objective Functions and Trade Policy PROFs and Tariffs” (1987) 24 Economics Letters p. 287–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, K, “Countervailing Duties” in Kerr, William A and Gaisford, James D (eds), Handbook of lnternational Trade Policy (Handbook of lnternational Trade Policy, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 2007)Google Scholar
Begg, D, Fischer, S, and Dornbusch, R, Economics (10th edn, McGraw-Hill Higher Education 2011)Google Scholar
Benitah, M, The Law of Subsidies under the GATT/WTO System (Kluwer Law International 2001)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, E, “Judicial Misgivings Regarding the Application of International Law: An Analysis of Attitudes of National Courts” (1993) 4 European Journal of International Law p. 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, GW, Trade Remedies in North America, vol 27 (Kluwer Law International 2010)Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J and Ramaswami, VK, “Domestic Distortions, Tariffs and the Theory of Optimum Subsidy” (1963) The Journal of Political Economy p. 44–50Google Scholar
Bossche, PVD and Zdouc, W, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases, and Materials (3rd edn, Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar
Bown, CP, “Taking Stock of Antidumping, Safeguards and Countervailing Duties, 1990–2009” (2011) 34 The World Economy p. 1955–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brou, D and Ruta, M, “A Commitment Theory of Subsidy Agreements” (2013) 13 The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy p.239–70Google Scholar
Broude, T, “Behavioral International Law” (2013) University of Pennsylvania Law Review p. 1099–2131Google Scholar
Burri-Nenova, M, “Trade versus Culture in the Digital Environment: An Old Conflict in Need of a New Definition” (2009) 12 Journal of International Economic Law p. 17–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, SJ, “Breach of Contract and the Common Law Duty to Perform in Good Faith” (1980) 94 Harvard Law Review p. 369–404Google Scholar
Caiado, J, “From Coordination to Collaboration: Explaining International Disputes over Tariff Classification” (2012) 3 Economic Analysis of Law Review p. 95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caiado, J and Bär, C, “Die Rolle von nationalen Behörden im Subventionsregime des WTO-Rechts – wurde der Bock zum Gärtner gemacht?” in Brändli, S and others (eds), Multinationale Unternehmen und Institutionen im Wandel – Herausforderungen für Wirtschaft, Recht und Gesellschaft Schriften der Assistierenden der Universität St Gallen (HSG), vol 8 (Multinationale Unternehmen und Institutionen im Wandel – Herausforderungen für Wirtschaft, Recht und Gesellschaft Schriften der Assistierenden der Universität St Gallen (HSG), Bern Stämpfli 2013)Google Scholar
Caiado, J and Berghaus, T, R&D Subsidies: A Law & Economics Analysis of Regional and International Rules (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, G and Melamed, AD, “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral” (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review p.1089–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaisse, J and Chakraborty, D, “Implementing WTO Rules through Negotiations and Sanction: The Role of Trade Policy Review Mechanism and Dispute Settlement System” (2007) 28 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic LawGoogle Scholar
Chang, SW, “WTO Disciplines on Fisheries Subsidies: A Historic Step towards Sustainability?” (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law p. 879–921Google Scholar
Cho, S-J, “GATT Non-Violation Issues in the WTO Framework: Are They the Achilles’ Heel of the Dispute Settlement Process” (1998) 39 Harvard International Law Journal p. 311Google Scholar
Cohen, GM, “Implied Terms and Interpretation in Contract Law” in Bouckaert, B and De Geest, G (eds), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol III The Regulation of Contracts (Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Edward Elgar 2000)Google Scholar
Cohen, GM, “The Negligence-Opportunism Tradeoff in Contract Law” (1992) 20 Hofstra Law Review p. 941–1016Google Scholar
Cooter, R and Ulen, T, Law and Economics (International Edition, New York: Pearson Addison Wesley 2008)Google Scholar
Coppens, D, WTO Disciplines on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Balancing Policy Space and Legal Constraints (Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law, Cambridge University Press 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craswell, R, “The Incomplete Contracts Literature and Efficient Precautions” (2005) 56 Case Western Reserve Law Review p. 151Google Scholar
Craswell, R, “Contract Law: General Theories” in Bouckaert, B and De Geest, G (eds), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol III The Regulation of Contracts (Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Edward Elgar 2000)Google Scholar
Davey, WJ, “The WTO Dispute Settlement System” in The World Bank (ed) Legal Aspects of International Trade (Legal Aspects of International Trade, The World Bank 2001)Google Scholar
Davey, WJ, “Dispute Settlement in GATT” (1987) 11 Fordham International Law Journal p. 52–109Google Scholar
de Moor, A, Key Issues in Subsidy Policies and Strategies for Reform (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean 1997)Google Scholar
DeRemer, D, The Evolution of International Subsidy Rules (Working Paper ECARES 2013)Google Scholar
DiMatteo, LA and others, Visions of Contract Theory: Rationality, Bargaining, and Interpretation (Carolina Academic Press 2007)Google Scholar
Doane, ML, “Green Light Subsidies: Technology Policy in International Trade” (1995) 21 Syracuse Journal of International Law & Commerce p. 155Google Scholar
Dunoff, JL and Trachtman, JP, “Economic Analysis of International Law” (1999) 24 Yale Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar
Editorial, Bedingt bereit zum Export (2016)Google Scholar
Fearon, JD, “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation” (1998) 52 International Organization p. 269–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, DS and Switzer, S, “Whither Article XX? Regulatory Autonomy Under Non-GATT Agreements After China—Raw Materials” (2012) 38 Yale Journal of International Law OnlineGoogle Scholar
Feld, LP and Voigt, S, “Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross-Country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators” (2003) 19 European Journal of Political Economy p. 497–527Google Scholar
Friederiszick, HW, Röller, L-H, and Verouden, V, “European State Aid Control: An Economic Framework” in Buccirossi, P (ed) Handbook of Antitrust Economics (Handbook of Antitrust Economics, The MIT Press 2008)Google Scholar
Friederiszick, HW, Röller, L-H, and Verouden, V, “EC State Aid Control: An Economic Perspective” in Rydelski, MS (ed) The EC State Aid Regime: Distortive Effects of State Aid on Competition and Trade (The EC State Aid Regime: Distortive Effects of State Aid on Competition and Trade, Cambridge University Press 2006)Google Scholar
Global Subsidies Initiative <http://www.iisd.org/gsi/> accessed 07.29.2016+accessed+07.29.2016>Google Scholar
Global Trade Alert <http://www.globaltradealert.org/> accessed 07.29.2016+accessed+07.29.2016>Google Scholar
Goetz, CJ, Granet, L, and Schwartz, WF, “The Meaning of ‘Subsidy’ and ‘Injury’ in the Countervailing Duty Law” (1986) 6 International Review of Law and Economics p. 17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Good Jobs First <http://www.goodjobsfirst.org> accessed 07.29.2016+accessed+07.29.2016>Google Scholar
Green, A, “Trade Rules and Climate Change Subsidies” (2006) 5 World Trade Review p. 377–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, A and Trebilcock, M, “The Enduring Problem of World Trade Organization Export Subsidies Rules” in Bagwell, K and others (eds), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade (Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade, Cambridge University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Grossarth, J, “Die Milch macht die müden Bauern nicht mehr munter” (04.18.2016) Frankfurter Allgemeine ZeitungGoogle Scholar
Grossman, GM and Mavroidis, PC, “US–Lead and Bismuth II: United States–Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products Originating in the United Kingdom: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? Privatization and the Injury Caused by Non-Recurring Subsidies” (2003) 2 World Trade Review p. 170–200Google Scholar
Guzman, A, How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (Oxford University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Guzman, A and Meyer, TL, “Explaining Soft Law” (2010) Berkeley Program in Law & Economics p. 1–45Google Scholar
Hadfield, GK, “Judicial Competence and the Interpretation of Incomplete Contracts” (1994) 23 The Journal of Legal Studies p.159–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, EM, Hughes, DA, and Victor, DG, “The Cognitive Revolution and the Political Psychology of Elite Decision Making” (2013) 11 Perspectives on Politics p. 368–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, M, “A Clash of Cultures? The UNESCO Diversity Convention and International Trade Law” (2006) 9 Journal of International Economic Law p. 515–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancher, L, Ottervanger, T, and Slot, PJ (eds), EU State Aids (Sweet & Maxwell 2012)Google Scholar
Hausman, DM, “Philosophy of Economics” in Zalta, EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol Winter 2013 (The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University 2013) <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/economics/> accessed 07.29.2016Google Scholar
Hayo, B and Voigt, S, “Explaining De Facto Judicial Independence” (2007) 27 International Review of Law and Economics p.269–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, BM and Kostecki, MM, The Political Economy of the World Trading System (Oxford University Press 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horlick, GN and Clarke, PA, “WTO Subsidies Discipline during and after the Crisis” (2010) 13 Journal of International Economic Law p. 859–74Google Scholar
Horlick, GN and Clarke, PA, “The 1994 WTO Subsidies Agreement” (1993) 17 World Competition p. 41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, H, Maggi, G, and Staiger, RW, “Trade Agreements as Endogenously Incomplete Contracts” (2010) 100 The American Economic Review p. 394–419Google Scholar
Howse, R, “Do the World Trade Organization Disciplines on Domestic Subsidies Make Sense? The Case for Legalizing Some Subsidies” in Bagwell, KW and others (eds), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade (Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade, Cambridge University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Irwin, DA, Mavroidis, PC, and Sykes, AO, The Genesis of the GATT (The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO Law, Cambridge University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Jackson, J, The Perplexities of Subsidies in International Trade, Chapter 11 (The World Trading System, MIT Press 1997)Google Scholar
Jegou, I and Rubini, L, “The Allocation of Emission Allowances Free of Charge: Legal and Economic Considerations” (2010) ICTSD Global Platform on Climate Change, Trade Policies and Sustainable EnergyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, HG, Optimal Trade Intervention in the Presence of Domestic Distortions (Rand McNally 1963)Google Scholar
Johnson, HG, “Optimum Tariffs and Retaliation” (1953) 21 The Review of Economic Studies p.142–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolls, C and Sunstein, CR, “Debiasing through Law” (2006) 35 The Journal of Legal Studies p. 199–242Google Scholar
Kaplow, L, “Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis” (1992) 42 Duke Law Journal p. 557–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karim, R, “Transparency is the Most Important Governance Issue in the WTO Subsidy Control” <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2498863> accessed 07.20.2016+accessed+07.20.2016>Google Scholar
Kathy, B, “Countervailing Duties” in Kerr, WA and Gaisford, JD (eds), Handbook of lnternational Trade Policy (Handbook of lnternational Trade Policy, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 2007)Google Scholar
Katz, AW, “Contractual Incompleteness: A Transactional Perspective” (2005) 56 Case Western Reserve Law Review p. 169Google Scholar
Keck, A and Schropp, S, “Indisputably Essential: The Economics of Dispute Settlement Institutions in Trade Agreements” (2008) 42 Journal of World Trade p. 785–812Google Scholar
Kim, K-Y, “Issues and Arguments in Trade Dispute Cases against Korean Industries on Countervailing Measures” (2003) 3  Journal of Korean Law p. 55–76Google Scholar
Kirchner, C, “The Power of Rational Choice Methodology in Guiding the Analysis and the Design of Public International Law Institutions—Concluding Remarks” (2008) University of Illinois Law Review p. 419–28Google Scholar
Knop, K, “Here and There: International Law in Domestic Courts” (1999) 32 New York University Journal of International Law & Politics p. 501Google Scholar
Kohler, B, “Das Schicksal der Bauern” (May 18, 2016) Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung p. 1Google Scholar
Koplow, D and Dernbach, J, “Federal Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Case Study of Increasing Transparency for Fiscal Policy” (2001) 26 Annual Review of Energy and the Environment p. 361–89Google Scholar
Koremenos, B, “Institutionalism and International Law” in Dunoff, JL and Pollack, MA (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar
Kovacic, WE and Shapiro, C, “Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking” (2000) 14 The Journal of Economic Perspectives p. 43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, PR, Obstfeld, M, and Melitz, M, International Trade: Theory and Policy (The Pearson Series in Economics, Pearson Education Limited 2014)Google Scholar
Laan, T, “Gaining Traction: The Importance of Transparency in Accelerating the Reform of Fossil-Fuel Subsidies” in Initiative GS (ed) Untold Billions: Fossil-Fuel Subsidies, Their Impacts and the Path to Reform (Untold Billions: Fossil-Fuel Subsidies, Their Impacts and the Path to Reform, International Institute for Sustainable Development and United Nations Environment Programme 2010)Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, The Development of International Law by the International Court (Cambridge University Press 1982)Google Scholar
Lester, S, “The Problem of Subsidies as a Means of Protectionism: Lessons from the WTO EC—AIRCRAFT Case” (2011) 12 Melbourne Journal of International Law p. 2–28Google Scholar
Lindsay, P, “The Ambiguity of GATT Article XXI: Subtle Success or Rampant Failure?” (2003) 52 Duke Law Journal p. 1277–313Google Scholar
Luengo, G, Regulation of Subsidies and State Aids in WTO and EC Law: Conflicts in International Trade Law (Kluwer Law International 2006)Google Scholar
Mackaay, E, “History of Law and Economics” in Bouckaert, B and De, Geest G (eds), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol I The History and Methodology of Law and Economics (Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Edward Elgar 2000)Google Scholar
Maggi, G and Staiger, RW, “Trade Disputes and Settlement” (2013) Department of Economics—Yale UniversityGoogle Scholar
Maggi, G and Staiger, RW, “Optimal Design of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Renegotiation” (2015) 7 American Economic Journal: Microeconomics p. 109–43Google Scholar
Mankiw, G, Principles of Macroeconomics (7th edn, Cengage Learning 2014)Google Scholar
Marceau, GZ, Anti-dumping and Anti-trust Issues in Free-trade Areas (Clarendon Press 1994)Google Scholar
Marceau, GZ and Trachtman, JP, “The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Physanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Map of the New World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods” (2002) 36 Journal of World Trade p. 811–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsilla, SI, “Recent Stimulus Packages and WTO Law on Subsidies” (2009) 3 World Customs Journal p. 63–78Google Scholar
Martin, L, “The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism” in Ruggie, JG (ed) Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form (Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form, Columbia University Press 1993)Google Scholar
Mavroidis, PC, “Licence to Adjudicate: A Critical Evaluation of the Work of the WTO Appellate Body So Far” in Hartigan, JC (ed) Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment, vol 6 (Trade Disputes and the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO: An Interdisciplinary Assessment, Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2009)Google Scholar
Mavroidis, PC, The Regulation of International Trade: The WTO Agreements on Trade in Goods (MIT Press 2016)Google Scholar
Mavroidis, PC, Messerlin, PA, and Wauters, JM (eds), The Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in the WTO (Cambridge University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Merrill, TW, “Judicial Prerogative, The” (1992) 12 Pace Law Review p. 327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micheau, C, State Aid, Subsidy and Tax Incentives under EU and WTO Law (Wolters Kluwer 2014)Google Scholar
Muris, TJ, “Opportunistic Behavior and the Law of Contracts” (1980) 65 Minnesota Law Review p. 521Google Scholar
OECD, Competition, State Aids and Subsidies (Policy Roundtables, 2010)Google Scholar
Oeter, S, “Legitimacy of Customary International Law” in Eger, T and others (eds), Economic Analysis of International Law (Economic Analysis of International Law, Mohr Siebeck 2014)Google Scholar
Office of Fair Trading of the UK, Public Subsidies (UNCTAD’s Seventh Session of the Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Competition Law and Policy 2004) p. 15Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, “The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement” (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly p. 325–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, Optimal Protection of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Petersmann, EU, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System: International Law, International Organizations and Dispute Settlement (Springer Netherlands 1997)Google Scholar
Posner, EA and Sykes, AO (eds), Economic Foundations of International Law (Harvard University Press 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, TM, “Negotiating WTO Fisheries Subsidy Disciplines: Can Subsidy Transparency and Classification Provide the Means towards an End to the Race for Fish” (2005) 13 Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 141Google Scholar
Przeworski, A, “On the Design of the State: A Principal-Agent Perspective” in Pereira, LCB and Spink, P (eds), Reforming the State: Managerial Public Administration in Latin America (Reforming the State: Managerial Public Administration in Latin America, Lynne Rienner Publishers 1999)Google Scholar
Ray, D, Development Economics (Princeton University Press 1998)Google Scholar
Reinert, KA, Rajan, RS and Glass, AJ (eds), The Princeton Encyclopedia of the World Economy, vol 2 (Princeton University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Ribeiro, GF and Caiado, J, “Why an Economic Analysis of International Public Law: Challenges and Perspectives in Brazil” (2015) 12 Braz J Int’l L p. 246Google Scholar
Rodrik, D, “The Economics of Export-Performance Requirements” (1987) 102 The Quarterly Journal of Economics p. 633–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, CK, “Public Choice and the Economic Analysis of Law” in Mercuro, N (ed) Law and Economics (Springer 1989)Google Scholar
Rubini, L, The Definition of Subsidy and State Aid: WTO and EC Law in Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubini, L, “Ain’t Wastin’ Time No More: Subsidies for Renewable Energy, The SCM Agreement, Policy Space, and Law Reform” (2012) 15 Journal of International Economic Law p. 525–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schill, S and Briese, R, “‘If the State Considers’: Self-Judging Clauses in International Dispute Settlement” (2009) 13 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law p. 61–140Google Scholar
Schlag, P, “Rules and Standards” (1985) 33 UCLA Law Review p. 379Google Scholar
Schropp, S, Trade Policy Flexibility and Enforcement in the WTO: A Law and Economic Analysis (Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law, Cambridge University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Schwartz, WF and Sykes, AO, “The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization” (2002) 31 The Journal of Legal Studies p. 179–204Google Scholar
Schorr, DK, Sustainability Criteria for Fisheries Subsidies: Options for the WTO and Beyond (UNEP/Earthprint 2007)Google Scholar
Scott, RE, “The Law and Economics of Incomplete Contracts” (2006) 2 Annual Review of Law and Social Science p. 279–97Google Scholar
Scott, RE and Stephan, PB, The Limits of Leviathan: Contract Theory and the Enforcement of International Law (1st edn, Cambridge Univiversity Press 2011)Google Scholar
Scott, RE and Triantis, GG, “Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of Contract Design” (2005) 56 Case Western Reserve Law Review p. 187–201Google Scholar
Scott, RE and Triantis, GG, “Anticipating Litigation in Contract Design” (2006) The Yale Law Journal p. 814–79Google Scholar
Shavell, S, “Damage Measures for Breach of Contract” (1980) 11 The Bell Journal of Economics p. 466–90Google Scholar
Sinn, H-W, “Germany’s Economic Unification: An Assessment after Ten Years” (2002) 10 Review of International Economics p. 113–28Google Scholar
Slotboom, M, A Comparison of WTO and EC Law: Do Different Objects and Purposes Matter for Treaty Interpretation? (London: Cameron May 2006)Google Scholar
Snidal, D, “Coordination versus Prisoners’ Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes” (1985) 79 The American Political Science Review p. 923–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiger, RW and Sykes, AO, “Non-Violations” (2013) 16 Journal of International Economic Law p. 741–75Google Scholar
Steger, D, “The WTO Doha Round Negotiations on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Issues for Negotiators” (Symposium on Economic Restructuring in Korea in Light of the Doha Development Round Negotiations on Rules)Google Scholar
Steger, D, “The Culture of the WTO: Why It Needs to Change” (2007) 10 Journal of International Economic Law p. 483–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stehmann, O, “Export Subsidies in the Regional Aircraft Sector—The Impact of Two WTO Panel Rulings against Canada and Brazil” (1999) 33 Journal of World Trade p. 97–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, A, “Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World” (1982) 36 International Organization p. 299–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, S, Addressing Local Content Requirements in a Sustainable Energy Trade Agreement (2013)Google Scholar
Stille, F and Teichmann, D, “German Subsidisation Policy in the Wake of Unification” (1993) 29 Economic Bulletin p. 11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, AO, “Countervailing Duty Law: An Economic Perspective” (1989) 89 Columbia Law Review p. 199–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, AO, “Subsidies and Countervailing Measures” in Macrory, P and others (eds), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis (The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, Springer 2005)Google Scholar
Sykes, AO, The Limited Economic Case for Subsidies Regulation (E15Initiative Think Piece 2015)Google Scholar
Thaler, RH and Sunstein, CR, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press 2008)Google Scholar
Thirlwall, AP, Economics of Development: Theory and Evidence (Palgrave Macmillan 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, JP, “Regulatory Jurisdiction and the WTO” (2007) 10 Journal of International Economic Law p. 631–51Google Scholar
Trachtman, JP, The Economic Structure of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, JP, “SCM and GATT Article XX – A Quick Question” (2014) World Trade Law <http://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2014/11/scm-and-gatt-article-xx-a-quick-question.html> accessed 09.24.2016+accessed+09.24.2016>Google Scholar
Tran, C, “Using GATT, Art XX to Justify Climate Change Measures in Claims under the WTO Agreements” (2010) 27 Environmental and Planning Law Journal p. 346Google Scholar
Trebilcock, MJ, Advanced Introduction to International Trade Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2015)Google Scholar
Trebilcock, MJ and Howse, R, The Regulation of International Trade (Psychology Press 2005)Google Scholar
Trofimov, ID, “The Failure of the International Trade Organization (ITO): A Policy Entrepreneurship Perspective” (2012) 5 Journal of Policy & Law p. 56Google Scholar
UK OoFTot, Public Subsidies (UNCTAD’s Seventh Session of the Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Competition Law and Policy, 2004)Google Scholar
van Aaken, A, “Begrenzte Rationalität und Paternalismusgefahr. Das Prinzip des schonendsten Paternalismus” in Anderheiden, M and others (eds), Paternalismus und Recht : in memorian Angela Augustin (1968–2004) (Paternalismus und Recht : in memorian Angela Augustin (1968–2004), Mohr Siebeck 2006)Google Scholar
van Aaken, A, “Towards Behavioral International Law and Economics: A Comment on Enriching Rational Choice Institutionalism for the Study of International Law” (2008) University of Illinois Law Review p. 47–59Google Scholar
van Aaken, A, “International Investment Law between Commitment and Flexibility: A Contract Theory Analysis” (2009) 12 Journal of International Economic Law p. 507–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Aaken, A, “Opportunities and the Limits of an Economic Analysis in International Law” (2011) 3 Transnational Corporations Review p. 27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Aaken, A, “Control Mechanisms in International Investment Law” in Douglas, Z and others (eds), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice, Oxford University Press 2013)Google Scholar
van Aaken, A, “Behavioral International Law and Economics” (2014) 55 Harvard International Law Journal p. 421–83Google Scholar
van Aaken, A, “Delegating Interpretative Authority in Investment Treaties: The Case of Joint Commissions” (2014) 11 Transnational Dispute Management p. 21–47Google Scholar
van Aaken, A, “Smart Flexibility Clauses in International Investment Treaties and Sustainable Development” (2014) 15 The Journal of World Investment & Trade p. 827–61Google Scholar
Wendt, A, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics” (1992) 46 International Organization p. 391–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whish, R and Bailey, D, Competition Law (Oxford University Press 2015)Google Scholar
Wouters, J and Coppens, D, “An Overview of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measuress Including a Discussion on the Agreement on Agriculture” in Bagwell, K and others (eds), Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade (Law and Economics of Contingent Protection in International Trade, Cambridge University Press 2010)Google Scholar
WTO, Exploring the Links between Subsidies, Trade and the WTO (World Trade Report 2006)Google Scholar
WTO, Understanding the WTO (WTO 2015)Google Scholar
WTO, “Dispute Settlement: Disputes by Agreement” (2016) <https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_agreements_index_e.htm?id=A20#> accessed 09.01.2018+accessed+09.01.2018>Google Scholar
WTO, “Multilateral Negotiation Rounds” (2016) <www.wto.org> accessed 08.16.2016+accessed+08.16.2016>Google Scholar
Zeiler, TW, “The Expanding Mandate of the GATT: The First Seven Rounds” in Narlikar, A and others (eds), The Oxford Handbook on The World Trade Organization (The Oxford Handbook on The World Trade Organization, Oxford University Press 2012)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • José Guilherme Moreno Caiado, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Commitments and Flexibilities in the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
  • Online publication: 15 October 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108565158.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • José Guilherme Moreno Caiado, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Commitments and Flexibilities in the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
  • Online publication: 15 October 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108565158.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • José Guilherme Moreno Caiado, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Commitments and Flexibilities in the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
  • Online publication: 15 October 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108565158.009
Available formats
×