Bibliography

Ernest Lim

doi:10.1017/9781108629065.015

2018 Proxy Paper Guidelines: An Overview of the Glass Lewis Approach to Proxy Advice: Hong Kong (2017).Google Scholar

2018 Proxy Paper Guidelines: An Overview of the Glass Lewis Approach to Proxy Advice: India (2017).Google Scholar

2018 Proxy Paper Guidelines: An Overview of the Glass Lewis Approach to Proxy Advice: Singapore (2017).Google Scholar

Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D., ‘Hard and Soft Law in International Governance’ (2000) 54 International Organization 421.Google Scholar

Abeyratne, R., ‘Judicial Independence and the Rise of the Supreme Court’ in Lee, H. P. and Pittard, M. (eds.), Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Afsharipour, A., ‘The Promise and Challenge of India’s Corporate Governance Reforms’ (2010) 1 Indian Journal of law and Economics 1.Google Scholar

Aghion, P. and Bolton, P. ‘An Incomplete Contracts Approach to Financial Contracting’ (1992) 59 Review of Economic Studies 473.Google Scholar

Aghion, P. and Stein, J. C. ‘Growth versus Margins: Destabilizing Consequences of Giving the Stock Market What It Wants’ (2008) 3 Journal of Finance 1025.Google Scholar

Albuquerque, R. A., Durnev, A. and Koskinen, Y., ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence’ (2013), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2291334.Google Scholar

Alexander, C., Chen, M., Seppi, D. and Spatt, C., ‘Interim News and the Role of Proxy Voting Advice’ (2010) 23 Review of Financial Studies 4419.CrossRef Google Scholar

Allaire, Y. and Dauphin, F., ‘“Activist” Hedge Funds: Creators of Lasting Wealth? What Do the Empirical Studies Really Say?’ (Institute for Governance and Public Organizations, July 2014).Google Scholar

Allen, F. and Qian, J., ‘Comparing Legal and Alternative Institutions in Finance and Commerce’ in Heckman, J. J., Nelson, R. L. and Cabatingan, L. (eds.), Global Perspectives on the Rule of Law (Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Allen, W. T. and Kraakman, R., Commentaries and Cases on the Law of Business Organization (Wolters Kluwer, 5th ed., 2016).Google Scholar

Almeida, H. V. and Wolfenzon, D., ‘A Theory of Pyramidal Ownership and Family Business Groups’ (2006) 61 Journal of Finance 2637.Google Scholar

Ameer, R. and Rahman, R. A., ‘The Impact of Minority Shareholder Watchdog Group Activism on the Performance of Targeted Firms in Malaysia’ (2009) 5 Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance 67.Google Scholar

American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law of Agency, Vol. 1 (American Law Institute Publishers, 3rd ed., 2006).Google Scholar

Amira, K. and Muzere, M. L., ‘Competition Among Stock Exchanges for Equity’ (2011) 35 Journal of Banking and Finance 2355.Google Scholar

Amran, N. A. and Ahmad, A. C., ‘Board Mechanisms and Malaysian Family Companies’ Performance’ (2011) 2 Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance 15.Google Scholar

Anabtawi, I. and Stout, L., ‘Fiduciary Duties for Activist Shareholders’ (2008) 60 Stanford Law Review 1255.Google Scholar

Anand, S., ‘Shareholder Activism in India’ (2016) 4 International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature 11.Google Scholar

Ang, J. S. and Ding, D. K., ‘Government Ownership and the Performance of Government-Linked Companies: The Case of Singapore’ (2006) 16 Journal of Multinational Financial Management 64.Google Scholar

Armour, J. and Lele, P., ‘Law, Finance, and Politics: The Case of India’ (2009) 43 Law and Society Review 491.Google Scholar

Armour, J. and Payne, J. (eds.), Rationality in Company Law (Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar

Armour, J., ‘Enforcement Strategies in UK Corporate Governance: A Roadmap and Empirical Assessment’ in Armour, J. and Payne, J. (eds.), Rationality in Company Law (Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar

Armour, J., Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘Agency Problems and Legal Strategies” in Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Pargendler, M., Ringe, W. G. and Rock, E., The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2017).Google Scholar

Armstrong, R. and Flaherty, M., ‘Temasek-Led Group Offers $2.1 Billion for Remaining Olam Shares’, Reuters, 14 March 2014.Google Scholar

Arsalidou, D., ‘Shareholders and Corporate Scrutiny: The Role of the UK Stewardship Code’ (2012) 9 European Company and Financial Law Review 342.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aspen Institute, ‘Overcoming Short-Termism’ (2009), available at www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/overcome_short_state0909_0.pdf.Google Scholar

Association for Sustainable & Responsible Investment in Asia Report on Asia Sustainable Review (2014).Google Scholar

Atanasov, V., Black, B. and Ciccotello, C. S., ‘Law and Tunnelling’ (2011) 37 Journal of Corporation Law 1.Google Scholar

Atanasov, V., Black, B. and Ciccotello, C. S., ‘Unbundling and Measuring Tunneling’ (2014) University of Illinois Law Review 101.Google Scholar

Avi-Yonah, R. S., ‘The Four Transformations of the Corporate Form’ in Choudhury, B. and Petrin, M. (eds.), Understanding the Company: Corporate Governance and Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Azizan, S. S. and Ameer, R., ‘Shareholder Activism in Family-Controlled Firms in Malaysia’ (2012) 27 Managerial Auditing Journal 774.Google Scholar

Baars, G. and Spicer, A., The Corporation: A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Back, K., Li, T. and Ljungqvist, A., ‘Liquidity and Governance’ (2015), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2350362.Google Scholar

Bainbridge, S. M., ‘Director Primacy and Shareholder Disempowerment’ (2006) 119 Harvard Law Review 1735.Google Scholar

Bainbridge, S. M., ‘The Case for Limited Shareholder Voting Rights’ (2006) 53 UCLA Law Review 601.Google Scholar

Baker, H. K., Nofsinger, J. R. and Weaver, D. G., ‘International Cross-Listing and Visibility’ (2002) 37 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 495.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baker, M., Ruback, R. S. and Wurgler, J., ‘Behaviorial Corporate Finance’ in Eckbo, B. E. (ed.), Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance (vol 1) (Elsevier North-Holland, 2008).Google Scholar

Balasubramanian, B. N., Black, B. S. and Khanna, V., ‘The Relation Between Firm-Level Corporate Governance and Market Value: A Case Study of India’ (2010) 11 Emerging Markets Review 319.Google Scholar

Balchunas, E., ‘Vanguard’s Gain is Wall Street’s Pain as Billions Leave the Financial Industry’, Bloomberg, 1 December 2015.Google Scholar

Balding, C., Sovereign Wealth Funds: The New Intersection of Money and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Bant, E. and Harding, M. (eds.), Exploring Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Barton, D. and Koller, T., ‘What CEOs Can Learn from Activist Investors’ (2015), available at www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/what-ceos-can-learn-from-activist-investors.Google Scholar

Barton, D., ‘Refocusing Capitalism on the Long-Term: Ownership and Trust Across the Investment Value Chain’ (2017) 33 Oxford Review of Economic Policy 188.Google Scholar

Barton, D., Manyika, J. and Williamson, S. K., ‘Finally, Evidence that Managing for the Long-Term Pays Off’ (2017) Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar

Baruah, B., ‘Vedanta-Cairn Merger Makes Investors Glum, Company Says It’s a Win-Win Deal’, Economic Times, 16 June 2015.Google Scholar

Baumol, W. J. (ed.), Public and Private Enterprises in a Mixed Economy (Palgrave Macmillan, 1980).CrossRef Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A. and Hamdani, A., ‘Independent Directors and Controlling Shareholders’ (2016) 165 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1271.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A. and Neeman, Z., ‘Investor Protection and Interest Group Politics’ (2010) 23 Review of Financial Studies 1089.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A. and Roe, M. J., ‘A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance’ (1999) 52 Stanford Law Review 127.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A., ‘The Debate on Contractual Freedom in Corporate Law’ (2004) 89 Columbia Law Review 1395.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A., ‘The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power’ (2005) 118 Harvard Law Review 833.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A., ‘The Case for Shareholder Access to the Ballot’ (2003) 59 Business Lawyer 43.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A., ‘The Myth of the Shareholder Franchise’ (2007) 93 Virginia Law Review 675.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A., ‘The Myth That Insulating Boards Serves Long Term Value’ (2013) 113 Columbia Law Review 1637.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A., Brav, A. and Jiang, W., ‘The Long-Term Effects of Hedge Fund Activism’ (2015) 115 Columbia Law Review 1085.Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A. and Hirst, S., ‘The Agency Problems of Institutional Investors’ (2017) 31 Journal of Economic Perspectives 89.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A., Kraakman, R. and Triantis, G. G., ‘Stock Pyramids, Cross-Ownership, and Dual Class Equity: The Mechanisms and Agency Costs of Separating Control from Cash-Flow Rights’ in Morck, R. K. (ed.), Concentrated Corporate Ownership (University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C. and Rossi, S., ‘Returns to Shareholder Activism: Evidence from a Clinical Study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund’ (2009) 22 Review of Financial Studies 3093.Google Scholar

Belinfanti, T., ‘Shareholder Cultivation and New Governance’ (2014) 38 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 789.Google Scholar

Bena, J., Ferreira, M. A., Matos, P. and Pires, P., ‘Are Foreign Investors Locusts? The Long-Term Effects of Foreign Institutional Ownership’ (2017) 126 Journal of Financial Economics 122.Google Scholar

Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Commerce Clearing House, 1932).Google Scholar

Bertrand, M., Mehta, P. and Mullainathan, S., ‘Ferreting out Tunneling: An Application to Indian Business Groups’ (2002) 117 Quarterly Journal of Economics 121.Google Scholar

Bhandari, V. and Arora, A., ‘Influence of Shareholders’ Activism and Firm-Level Variables on the Corporate Governance Quality in India’ (2016) 9 Indian Journal of Corporate Governance 122.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bhattacharyya, A. K., ‘Public Enterprises – Corporate Governance and the Role of Government’ (2005), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=697381 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.697381.Google Scholar

Bhide, A., ‘The Hidden Costs of Stock Market Liquidity’ (1993) 34 Journal of Financial Economics 31.Google Scholar

Centre, Big Innovation, The Purposeful Company: Interim Report (2016).Google Scholar

Centre, Big Innovation, The Purposeful Company: The Policy Report (2017).Google Scholar

Birkmose, H. S. (ed.), Shareholders’ Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2017).Google Scholar

Black, B. S. and Khanna, V. S., ‘Can Corporate Governance Reforms Increase Firm Market Values? Event Study Evidence from India’ (2007) 4 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 749.Google Scholar

BlackRock, Corporate governance and proxy voting guidelines for Hong Kong securities (2016).Google Scholar

BlackRock, Global Corporate Governance and Engagement Principles (2014).Google Scholar

BlackRock, Investment Stewardship Report: 2017 Voting and Engagement Report (2017).Google Scholar

Blair, M. M. and Stout, L. A., ‘A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law’ (1999) 85 Virginia Law Review 247.Google Scholar

BNP Paribas Asia Strategy Report, Corporate governance and shareholder activism in Asia (2014).Google Scholar

Boeger, N. and Villiers, C. (eds.), Shaping the Corporate Landscape (Hart Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar

Bogg, A., Costello, C., Davies, A. C. L. and Prassl, J. (eds.),The Autonomy of Labour Law (Hart Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar

Bolton, P., Scheinkman, J. and Xiong, W., ‘Executive Compensation and Short-Termist Behavior in Speculative Markets’ (2006) 73 Review of Economic Studies 577.CrossRef Google Scholar

Boon, R., ‘Advisory Firm Recommends that Institutional Investors Accept Offer for SMRT Buyout’ Straits Times, 16 September 2016.Google Scholar

Bower, J. L. and Paine, L. S., ‘The Error at the Heart of Corporate Leadership’ (2017) 95 Harvard Business Review 50.Google Scholar

Brandenburger, M. and Nalebuff, B. J., Co-Opetition (Crown Publishing, 1996).Google Scholar

Bratton, W. W. and McCahery, J. A. (eds.), Institutional Investor Activism: Hedge Funds and Private Equity, Economics and Regulation (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Bratton, W. W. and Watcher, M. L., ‘The Case Against Shareholder Empowerment’ in Bratton, W. W. and McCahery, J. A. (eds.), Institutional Investor Activism: Hedge Funds and Private Equity, Economics and Regulation (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Brav, A., Jiang, W. and Kim, H., ‘The Real Effects of Hedge Fund Activism: Productivity, Asset Allocation, and Labor Outcomes’ (2015) 28 Review of Financial Studies 2723.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brav, A., Jiang, W., Partnoy, F. and Thomas, R. S., ‘Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance’ in Bratton, W. W. and McCahery, J. A. (eds.), Institutional Investor Activism: Hedge Funds and Private Equity, Economics and Regulation (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Brennan, M. J. and Cao, H. H. ‘International Portfolio Investment Flows’ (1997) 52 Journal of Finance 1851.Google Scholar

Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C. and Smith, C. W. Jr., ‘Ownership Structure and Voting on Antitakeover Amendments’ (1988) 20 Journal of Financial Economics 267.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burkart, M., Gromb, D. and Panunzi, F., ‘Large Shareholders, Monitoring, and the Value of the Firm’ (1997) 112 Quarterly Journal of Economics 693.Google Scholar

Burrows, A. (ed.), English Private Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2007).Google Scholar

Burrows, A., ‘Post-Legislative Scrutiny, Legislative Boundary and the ‘Elusive’ Boundary’ in Dyson, M., Lee, J. and Stark, S. W. (eds.), Fifty Years of the Law Commissions: The Dynamics of Law Reform (Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar

Burrows, A., ‘The Relationship Between Common Law and Statute in the Law of Obligations’ (2012) 128 Law Quarterly Review 232.Google Scholar

Bursa Malaysia Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar

Busch, D., Macgregor, L. and Watts, P., Agency Law in Commercial Practice (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Butler, H. N. and Ribstein, L. E., ‘Opting Out of Fiduciary Duties: A Response to the Anti-Contractarians’ (1990) 65 Washington Law Review 1.Google Scholar

Cahn, A., ‘The Shareholders’ Fiduciary Duty in German Company Law’ in Birkmose, H. (ed.), Shareholders’ Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2017).Google Scholar

Cahn, A. and Donald, D. C., Comparative Company Law: Text and Cases on the Laws Governing Corporations in Germany, the UK and the USA (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Cahn, A. and v. Spannenberg, M. A., ‘s 53a margin note 38’ in Spindler, G. and Stilz, E. (eds.), Akitiengesetz (C.H. Beck, 3rd ed., 2015).Google Scholar

Cahn, A. and v. Spannenberg, M. A., ‘s 53a margin note 52’ in Spindler, G. and Stilz, E. (eds.), Akitiengesetz (C.H. Beck, 3rd ed., 2015).Google Scholar

Cahn, A., ‘The Shareholders’ Fiduciary Duty in German Company Law’ in Birkmose, H. S. (eds.), Shareholders’ Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2017).Google Scholar

Cain, M. D., Fisch, J. E., Griffith, S. J. and Solomon, S. D., ‘How Corporate Governance Is Made: The Case of the Golden Leash’ (2016) 164 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 649.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W. and Mackinlay, A. C., The Econometrics of Financial Markets (Princeton University Press, 2nd ed., 1996).Google Scholar

Canavan, J., Jones, B., and Potter, M. J., ‘Board Tenure: How Long Is Too Long?’ (2004) 28 Boards & Directors 39.Google Scholar

Carney, M. and Andriesse, E., ‘Malaysia: Personal Capitalism’ in Witt, M. A. and Redding, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Asian Business Systems (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Carney, R. W. and Child, T. B., ‘Changes to the Ownership and Control of East Asian Corporations Between 1996 and 2008: The Primacy of Politics’ (2013) 107 Journal of Financial Economics 494.Google Scholar

Caselli, S., Corbetta, G. and Vecchi, V. (eds.), Public Private Partnerships for Infrastructure and Business Development Principles, Practices, and Perspectives (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).Google Scholar

Caton, G. L., Goh, J. and Donaldson, J., ‘The Effectiveness of Institutional Activism’ (2001) 57 Financial Analysts Journal 21.Google Scholar

Cetorelli, N. and Peristiani, S., ‘Prestigious Stock Exchanges: A Network Analysis of International Financial Centers’ (2013) 37 Journal of Banking & Finance 1543.Google Scholar

CFA Institute Report on Corporate Governance for Asian Publicly Listed Family-Controlled Firms (2017).Google Scholar

Chandrachud, A., ‘The Insulation of India’s Constitutional Judiciary’ (2010) 45 Economic and Political Weekly 38.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, D., ‘GIFT to Create Regulatory Crisis for RBI, SEBI: Mistry’, Business Standard, 23 February 2016.Google Scholar

Cheffins, B., Corporate Ownership and Control: British Business Transformed (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Chen, A. H. Y. and Lo, P. Y., ‘Hong Kong’s Judiciary Under “One Country, Two Systems”’ in Lee, H. P. and Pittard, M. (eds.), Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Chen, W. (ed.), The Beijing Consensus? How China Has Changed the Western Ideas of Law and Economic Development (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Chen, V., ‘The Statutory Derivative Action in Malaysia: Comparison with an Australian Judicial Approach’ (2017) 12 Asian Journal of Comparative Law 281.Google Scholar

Chen, X., Harford, J. and Li, K., ‘Monitoring: Which Institutions Matter?’ (2007) 86 Journal of Financial Economics 279.Google Scholar

Chen, Z., Cheung, Y. L., Stouraitis, A. and Wong, A. W. S., ‘Ownership Concentration, Firm Performance, and Dividend Policy in Hong Kong’ (2005) 13 Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 431.Google Scholar

Cheung, Y. L., Connelly, J. T., Jiang, P., and Limpaphayom, P., ‘Does Corporate Governance Predict Future Performance? Evidence from Hong Kong.’ (2011) 40 Financial Management 159.Google Scholar

Cheung, Y. L., Connelly, J. T., Limpaphayom, P. and Zhou, L., ‘Do Investors Really Value Corporate Governance? Evidence from the Hong Kong Market’ (2007) 18 Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 86.Google Scholar

Cheung, Y. L., Haw, I. M., Tan, W. and Wang, W., ‘Board Structure and Intragroup Propping: Evidence from Family Business Groups in Hong Kong’ (2014) 43 Financial Management 569.Google Scholar

Cheung, Y. L., Rau, P. R. and Stouraitis, A. ‘Tunnelling, Propping, and Expropriation: Evidence from Connected Party Transactions in Hong Kong’ (2006) 82 Journal of Financial Economics 343.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cheung, Y. L., Stouraitis, A. and Wong, A. W. S., ‘Ownership Concentration and Executive Compensation in Closely Held Firms: Evidence from Hong Kong’ (2005) 12 Journal of Empirical Finance 511.Google Scholar

China Mobile Limited Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar

Chiu, I., ‘Operationalising a Stakeholder Conception in Company Law’ (2016) 10 Law Financial Markets Review 173.Google Scholar

Chiu, I. H. Y. and Katelouzou, D., ‘From Shareholder Stewardship to Shareholder Duties: Is the Time Ripe?’ in Birkmose, H. S. (eds.), Shareholders’ Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2017).Google Scholar

Chiu, I. H. Y., McKee, M. and Donovan, A. P. (eds.), The Law on Corporate Governance in Banks (Edward Elgar, 2015).CrossRef Google Scholar

Chivers, D., Shaw, B., Bryant, C. and Staynings, C. (eds.), The Law of Majority Shareholder Power, Use and Abuse (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Choi, A. ‘Concentrated Ownership and Long-Term Shareholder Value’ (2018) 8 Harvard Business Law Review 53.Google Scholar

Choper, J. H., Coffee, J. C. and Gilson, R. J., Cases and Materials on Corporations (Wolters Kluwer, 7th ed., 2008).Google Scholar

Choudhury, B. and Petrin, M. (eds.), Understanding the Company: Corporate Governance and Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

CITIC Limited Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar

Claessens, S., Djankov, S. and Lang, L. H. P., ‘Who Controls East Asian Corporations – and the Implications for Legal Reform’, Public Policy for the Private Sector, Note no. 195. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1999.Google Scholar

Claessens, S., Djankov, S. and Lang, L. H. P., ‘The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations’ (2000) 58 Journal of Financial Economics 81.Google Scholar

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H. and Lang, L. H. P., ‘Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings’ (2002) 57 Journal of Finance 2741.Google Scholar

Clark, C. E. and Van Buren, H. J. B., ‘Compound Conflicts of Interest in the US Proxy System’ (2013) 116 Journal of Business Ethics 355.Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C. and Palia, D., ‘The Wolf at the Door: The Impact of Hedge Fund Activism on Corporate Governance’ (2016) 1 Annals of Corporate Governance 1.Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C., ‘Law and the Market: The Impact of Enforcement’ (2007) 156 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 229.Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C., ‘Liquidity Versus Control: The Institutional Investor as Corporate Monitor’ (1991) 91 Columbia Law Review 1277.Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C., ‘Preserving the Corporate Superego in a Time of Activism: An Essay on Ethics and Economics’ (2017) 33 Oxford Review of Economic Policy 221.Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C., ‘Racing Towards the Top: The Impact of Cross-Listing and Stock Market Competition on International Corporate Governance’ (2002) 102 Columbia Law Review 1757.Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C., ‘The Future as History: The Prospects for Global Convergence in Corporate Governance and Its Implications’ (1999) 93 Northwestern University Law Review 641.Google Scholar

Companies Commission of Malaysia Annual Report (2014).Google Scholar

Company Law Review, Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: The Strategic Framework (1999).Google Scholar

Conaglen, M., Fiduciary Loyalty: Protecting the Due Performance of Non-Fiduciary Duties (Hart Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar

Corporate Governance Reform: The Government response to the green paper consultation (2017).Google Scholar

Council of Institutional Investors, Dual Class Companies List (March 2017).Google Scholar

Coutinho, A., ‘NSE Mulls Foreign Listing Along with Self-Listing’, Business Standard, 8 March 2016.Google Scholar

Crane, A. D., Koch, A. and Michenaud, S., ‘Institutional Investor Cliques and Governance’ (2019) 133 Journal of Financial Economics 175.Google Scholar

Credit Suisse, Asian Family Businesses Report (2011).Google Scholar

Cremers, M., Gjambona, E., Sepe, S. M. and Wang, Y., ‘Hedge Fund Activism and Long-Term Firm Value’ (2015), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2693231.Google Scholar

Cremers, M., Pareek, A., and Sautner, Z., ‘Short-Term Investors, Long-Term Investments, and Firm Value’ (2017), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2720248.Google Scholar

Crotty, J., ‘The Neoliberal Paradox: The Impact of Destructive Product Market Competition and “Modern” Financial Markets on Nonfinancial Corporation Performance in the Neoliberal Era’ in Epstein, G. A., Financialisation and the World Economy (Edward Elgar, 2006).Google Scholar

Cvijanovic, D., Dasgupta, A. and Zachariadis, K., ‘Ties That Bind: How Business Connections Affect Mutual Fund Activism’ (2016) 71 Journal of Finance 2933.Google Scholar

Dai, S. and Helfrich, C., ‘The Structure of Corporate Ownership and Control’ (2016), available at http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=fisch_2016.Google Scholar

Dal Bo, P., ‘Cooperation Under the Shadow of the Future: Experimental Evidence from Infinitely Repeated Games’ (2005) 95 American Economic Review 1591.Google Scholar

Dallas, L. L., “Short-Termism, the Financial Crisis, and Corporate Governance” (2012) 37 Journal of Corporation Law 265.Google Scholar

Dammann, J. and Hansmann, H., ‘Globalizing Commercial Litigation’ (2008) 94 Cornell Law Review 1.Google Scholar

Datar, A. P. and Balasubramanian, S., A Ramaiya Guide to the Companies Act (Lexis Nexis, 18th ed., 2014).Google Scholar

Davidoff, S. M., ‘Fairness Opinions’ (2006) 55 American University Law Review 1557.Google Scholar

Davies, P. ‘Efficiency Arguments for the Collective Representation of Workers’ in Bogg, A., Costello, C., Davies, A. C. L. and Prassl, J. (eds.), The Autonomy of Labour Law (Hart Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar

Davies, P. and Worthington, S., Gower and Davies’ Principles of Modern Company Law (Sweet & Maxwell, 9th ed., 2012).Google Scholar

Davies, P. and Worthington, S., Gower Principles of Modern Company Law (Sweet & Maxwell, 10th ed., 2016).Google Scholar

Davies, P., ‘Shareholders in the United Kingdom’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar

Davies, R., Haldane, A. G., Nielsen, M. and Pezzini, S., ‘Measuring the Costs of Short-Termism’ (2014) 12 Journal of Financial Stability 16.Google Scholar

Davis, G. F. and Kim, E. H., ‘Business Ties and Proxy Voting by Mutual Funds’ (2007) 85 Journal of Financial Economics 552.CrossRef Google Scholar

Davis, S. M., ‘The Costs of Fiduciary Failure – and an Agenda for Remedy’ in Hawley, J. P., Hoepner, A. G. F., Johnson, K. L., Sandberg, J. and Waitzer, E. J. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Institutional Investment and Fiduciary Duty (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Dayanandan, A., Malik, S. and Nautiyal, S., ‘Effectiveness of SEBI’s Complaints Redress Systems (SCORES) in India’ (2015), available at https://www.sebi.gov.in/sebi_data/DRG_Study/DRG_II_Scores_15092015.pdf.Google Scholar

Debroy, B., ‘Some Issues in Law Reform in India” in Dethier, J. J. (eds.), Governance, Decentralization, and Reform in China, India and Russia (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000).Google Scholar

DeHaan, E., Larcker, D. and McClure, C., ‘Long-Term Economic Consequences of Hedge Fund Activist Interventions’ (2018), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3260095.Google Scholar

Deng, X., Kang, J. K. and Low, B. S., ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Value Maximization: Evidence from Mergers’ (2013) 110 Journal of Financial Economics 87.Google Scholar

DeMott, D. A., ‘Beyond Metaphor: An Analysis of Fiduciary Obligation’ (1988) Duke Law Journal 879.Google Scholar

Dethier, J. J. (eds.), Governance, Decentralization, and Reform in China, India and Russia (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000).Google Scholar

Dharmapala, D. and Khanna, V. S., ‘Corporate Governance, Enforcement, and Firm Value: Evidence from India’ (2008), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1105732.Google Scholar

Dharwadkar, R., George, G. and Brandes, P., ‘Privatization in Emerging Economies: An Agency Theory Perspective’ 25 Academy of Management Review 650.Google Scholar

Dieleman, M., Shim, J. and Ibrahim, M., ‘Success and Succession: A Study of SGX-listed Family Firms’ (2013), available at https://bschool.nus.edu.sg/Portals/0/images/CGIO/Report/Asian%20Family%20Business%20Report.pdf.Google Scholar

Dignam, A. and Lowry, J., Company Law (Oxford University Press, 5th ed., 2009).Google Scholar

Dignam, A. and Lowry, J., Company Law (Oxford University Press, 8th ed., 2014).Google Scholar

Dine, J. and Koutsias, M., Company Law (Palgrave MacMillan, 6th ed., 2007).Google Scholar

Directive (EU) 2017/828 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 Amending Directive 2007/36/EC as Regards the Encouragement of Long-Term Shareholder Engagement (2017).Google Scholar

Djankov, S., Hart, O., McLiesh, C. and Shleifer, A., ‘Debt Enforcement Around the World’ (2008) 116 Journal of Political Economy 1105.Google Scholar

Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., ‘The Law and Economics of Self-Dealing’ (2008) 88 Journal of Financial Economics 430.Google Scholar

Doidge, C. G., Karolyi, A. and Stulz, R. M., ‘Why Are Foreign Firms Listed in the US Worth More?’ (2004) 71 Journal of Financial Economics 205.Google Scholar

Donald, D. and Cahn, A., Comparative Company Law: Text and Cases on the Corporate Laws of Germany, the UK and the US (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Donald, D. and Cheuk, P. W. H., ‘Hong Kong’s Public Enforcement Model of Investor Protection’ (2017) 4 Asian Journal of Law and Society 349.Google Scholar

Donald, D. C. and Cheuk, P. W. H., ‘Hong Kong’s Public Enforcement Model of Investor Protection’ (2017) 4 Asian Journal of Law and Society 348.Google Scholar

Donald, D. C., Wang, J. and VanderWolk, J. P., A Financial Center for Two Empires: Hong Kong’s Corporate, Securities and Tax Laws in Its Transition from Britain to China (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Doshi, V., ‘India’s Long Wait for Justice: 27 m Court Cases Trapped in Legal Logjam’, Guardian, 5 May 2016.Google Scholar

Douglas, S. and McFarlane, B., ‘Defining Property Rights’ in Penner, J. E. and Smith, H. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Property Law (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Drygala, T., ‘s 53a margin note 97’ in Zollner, W. and Noack, U. (eds.), Kolner Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz (Carl Heymanns, 3rd ed., 2011).Google Scholar

Duggan, A., ‘Contracts, Fiduciaries and the Primacy of the Deal’ in Harding, M. and Bant, E. (eds.), Exploring Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Dunkley, E., ‘Lure of Tech IPOs Spurs Asian Exchanges to Seek Dual-Class Listings’, Financial Times, 23 January 2018.Google Scholar

Dvck, A. and Zingales, L., ‘Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison’ (2004) 59 Journal of Finance 537.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. and Zingales, L., ‘The Corporate Governance Role of the Media’ (2002), available at www.nber.org/papers/w9309.pdf.Google Scholar

Dyson, M., Lee, J. and Stark, S. W. (eds.), Fifty Years of the Law Commissions: The Dynamics of Law Reform (Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F. H., ‘Two-Agency Cost Explanation of Dividends’ (1984) 74 American Economic Review 650.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F. H. and Fischel, D. R., ‘Voting in Corporate Law’ (1983) 26 Journal of Law and Economics 395.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F. H. and Fischel, D. R., The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G., ‘The Impact of a Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance’ (2014) 60 Management Science 2835.Google Scholar

Eckbo, B. E. (eds.), Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance (vol 1) (Elsevier North-Holland, 2008).Google Scholar

Eckert, D., ‘Shareholder and Management: A Comparative View on Some Corporate Problems in the United States and Germany’ (1960) 46 Iowa Law Review 12.Google Scholar

Edelman, J., ‘Four Fiduciary Puzzles’ in Bant, E. and Harding, M. (eds.), Exploring Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Edelman, J., ‘When Do Fiduciary Duties Arise?’ (2010) 126 Law Quarterly Review 302.Google Scholar

Edmans, A., ‘Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices’ (2011) 101 Journal of Financial Economics 621.Google Scholar

Edmans, A., ‘The Link Between Job Satisfaction and Firm Value, With Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility’ (2012) 26 Academy of Management Perspectives 1.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, M. A., ‘The Structure of Corporation Law’ (1989) 89 Columbia Law Review 1461.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, M. A., Corporations and Other Business Organizations (Foundation Press, 9th ed., 2005).Google Scholar

Enriques, L. and Romano, A., ‘Institutional Investor Voting Behavior: A Network Theory Perspective’ (2018), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3157708.Google Scholar

Enriques, L., ‘Related Party Transactions’ in Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

EPF Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar

EPF Corporate Governance Principles and Voting Guidelines (2014).Google Scholar

EPF Voting Guidelines at Shareholders’ Meeting (2017).Google Scholar

Epstein, G. A., Financialisation and the World Economy (Edward Elgar, 2006).Google Scholar

Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F. and Oesch, D., ‘Shareholder Votes and Proxy Advisors: Evidence from Say on Pay’ (2013) 51 Journal of Accounting Research 951.Google Scholar

EU Shareholder Rights Directive, Directive (EU) 2017/828 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2017).Google Scholar

European Commission Green Paper, Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions and Remuneration Policies COM (2010).Google Scholar

European Commission Green Paper, The EU Corporate Governance Framework COM (2011).Google Scholar

Faccio, M., ‘Politically Connected Firms’ (2006) 96 American Economic Review 369.Google Scholar

Faccio, M., Lang, L. H. P. and Young, L., ‘Dividends and Expropriation’ (2001) 91 American Economic Review 54.Google Scholar

Fama, E., ‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm’ (1980) 88 Journal of Political Economy 288.Google Scholar

Fan, J. P. H. and Wong, T. J., ‘Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia’ (2002) 33 Journal of Accounting and Economics 401.Google Scholar

Fan, J. P. H., Wei, J. K. C. and Xu, X., ‘Corporate Finance and Governance in Emerging Markets: A Selective Review and an Agenda for Future Research’ (2011) 17 Journal of Corporate Finance 207.Google Scholar

Farient Advisors Report on Global Trends in Corporate Governance (2017).Google Scholar

FCA Consultation Paper on Proposal to Create a New Premium Listing Category for Sovereign Controlled Companies (CP 17/21) (2017).Google Scholar

Ferran, E., ‘After the Crisis: the Regulation of Hedge Funds and Private Equity in the EU’ (2011) 12 European Business Organization Law Review 379.Google Scholar

Ferran, E., ‘Corporate Mobility and Company Law’ (2016) 79 Modern Law Review 813.Google Scholar

Ferrell, A., Liang, H. and Renneboog, L., ‘Socially Responsible Firms’ (2016) 122 Journal of Financial Economics 585.Google Scholar

Fichtner, J., Heemskerk, E. M. and Garcia-Bernardo, J., ‘Hidden Power of the Big Three? Passive Index Funds, Re-Concentration of Corporate Ownership, and New Financial Risk’ (2017), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2798653.Google Scholar

Financial Reporting Council, Proposed Revisions to the UK Corporate Governance Code (2017).Google Scholar

Financial Services and The Treasury Bureau, Public Consultation on Company Names, Directors’ Duties, Corporate Directorship and Registration of Charges Compendium of Responses (2008).Google Scholar

Fink, L. ‘A Sense of Purpose’ (2018), available at www.blackrock.com/corporate/investor-relations/larry-fink-ceo-letter.Google Scholar

Finn, P., ‘The Fiduciary Principle’ in Youdan, T. G., Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts (Carswell, 1989).Google Scholar

Fisman, R. and Khanna, T., ‘Facilitating Development: The Role of Business Groups’ (2004) 32 World Development 609.Google Scholar

Flannigan, R., ‘Shareholder Fiduciary Accountability’ (2014) Journal of Business Law 1.Google Scholar

Fleckner, A. M. and Hopt, K. J., Comparative Corporate Governance: A Functional and International Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Fleischer, H., ‘s 53a margin note 55’ in Schmidt, K. and Lutter, M. (eds.), Aktiengesetz (Otto Schmidt, 3rd ed., 2015).Google Scholar

Fontanills, G. A. and Gentile, T., The Stock Market Course (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001).Google Scholar

Fornell, C., Mithas, S., Morgeson, F. V. and Krishnan, M. S., ‘Customer Satisfaction and Stock Prices: High Returns, Low Risk’ (2006) 70 Journal of Marketing 3.Google Scholar

Fornell, C., Mithas, S., Morgeson, F. V. and Krishnan, M. S., ‘Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital?’ (2011) 35 Journal of Banking & Finance 2388.Google Scholar

Frankel, T., ‘Fiduciary Duties as Default Rules’ (1995) 74 Oregon Law Review 1209.Google Scholar

Franks, J., Mayer, C. and Renneboog, L., ‘Who Disciplines Management in Poorly Performing Companies?’ (2001) 10 Journal of Financial Intermediation 209.Google Scholar

French, K. R., ‘Presidential Address: The Cost of Active Investing’ (2008) 63 Journal of Finance 1537.Google Scholar

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, ‘A Legal Framework for the Integration of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues into Institutional Investment’ (2005).Google Scholar

Friede, F., Busch, T. and Bassen, A., ‘ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies’ (2015) 5 Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 210.Google Scholar

Friedman, E., Johnson, S. and Mitton, T., ‘Propping and Tunneling’ (2003) 31 Journal of Comparative Economics 732.Google Scholar

Frostick, X., ‘Is There a Duty to Act in the Best Interests of the Beneficiaries?’ (2000) 83 Pension Lawyer 2.Google Scholar

Fround, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A. and Williams, K., Financialization and Strategy: Narrative and Numbers (Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

FSA Annual Report (2006).Google Scholar

Gallagher, D., Remarks at Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals, 2013, 67th National Conference, Seattle, Washington (2013).Google Scholar

Garg, A. K., ‘Influence of Board Size and Independence on Firm Performance: A Study of Indian Companies’ (2007) 32 VIKALPA 39.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gaspar, J. M., Massa, M. and Matos, P., ‘Shareholder Investment Horizons and the Market for Corporate Control’ (2005) 76 Journal of Financial Economics 135.Google Scholar

Geddie, J., ‘Keppel Bribery Fine Puts Spotlight on Peer Sembcorp, Shares Slide’, Euronews 26 December 2017.Google Scholar

Geis, G. S., ‘Can Independent Blockholding Play Much of a Role in Indian Corporate Governance?’ (2007) 3 Corporate Governance Law Review 283.Google Scholar

Geis, G. S., ‘Shareholder Power in India’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar

Genting Berhad Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar

Genting Singapore PLC Sustainability Report (2015).Google Scholar

George, C., Singapore, Incomplete: Reflections on a First World Nation’s Arrested Political Development (Ethos Books, 2017).Google Scholar

Getzler, J., ‘Ascribing and Limiting Fiduciary Obligations’ in Gold, A. S. and Miller, P. B. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Ghai, S. and Tarnowski, M., ‘From Big to Great: The World’s Leading Institutional Investors Forge Ahead’ (2016).Google Scholar

Gillian, S. L. and Starks, L. T., ‘The Evolution of Shareholder Activism in the United States’ (2007) 19 Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 55.Google Scholar

Gilson, R. J., ‘Corporate Governance and Economic Efficiency: When Do Institutions Matter?’ (1996) 74 Washington University Law Quarterly 327.Google Scholar

Gilson, R. J. ‘Controlling Shareholders and Corporate Governance: Complicating the Comparative Taxonomy’ (2006) 119 Harvard Law Review 1641.Google Scholar

Gilson, R. J., ‘Controlling Family Shareholders in Developing Countries: Anchoring Relational Exchange’ (2007) 60 Stanford Law Review 633.Google Scholar

Gilson, R. J. and Gordon, J. N. ‘Controlling Controlling Shareholders’ (2003) 152 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 785.Google Scholar

Gilson, R. J. and Gordon, J. N., ‘The Agency Costs of Agency Capitalism: Activist Investors and the Revaluation of Governance Rights’ (2013) 113 Columbia Law Review 863.Google Scholar

Gilson, R. J. and Schwartz, A., ‘Constraints on Private Benefits of Control: Ex Ante Control Mechanisms versus Ex Post Transaction Review’ (2013) 169 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160.Google Scholar

Gilson, R. J., Hansmann, H. and Pargendler, M., ‘Regulatory Dualism as a Development Strategy: Corporate Reform in Brazil, the United States, and the European Union’ (2011) 63 Stanford Law Review 475.Google Scholar

Goh, C. F. and Rasli, A., ‘CEO Duality, Board Independence, Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Family Firms: Evidence from the Manufacturing Industry in Malaysia’ (2014) 13 Asian Business & Management 333.Google Scholar

Goh, C. F., Rasli, A. and Khan, S. U. R., ‘Economic Incentives for Family Controlling Shareholders and the Monitoring Role of Non-Dominant Large Shareholders in Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Manufacturing Firms in Malaysia’ (2014) 17 South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 471.Google Scholar

Goh, Y. E., ‘Making SGX RegCo “truly independent”’, Straits Times, 14 August 2017.Google Scholar

Gold, A. S. and Miller, P. B. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Goldstein, S., ‘Redefining the Role of the Annual Report’ (2012), available at www.stuartzgoldstein.com/articles/role_annual_report.html.Google Scholar

Gomez, E. T. and Jomo, K. S., Malaysia’s Political Economy: Politics, Patronage and Profits (Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 1999).Google Scholar

Gomez, E. T., Padmanabhan, T., Kamaruddin, N., Bhalla, S. and Fisal, F., Minister of Finance Incorporated: Ownership and Control of Corporate Malaysia (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).Google Scholar

Goodman, B., ‘Tapping the Brakes on High-Speed Trading’, Barrons, 25 February 2012.Google Scholar

Gopalana, R., Nandab, V. and Seruc, A., ‘Affiliated Firms and Financial Support: Evidence from Indian Business Groups’ (2007) 86 Journal of Financial Economics 759.Google Scholar

Gordon, J., ‘“Say on Pay”: Cautionary Notes on the U.K. Experience and the Case for Shareholders Opt-In’ (2009) 46 Harvard Journal on Legislation 323.Google Scholar

Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Gordon, J. N. and Roe, M. J., Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Goshen, Z. and Hamdani, A., ‘Corporate Control and Idiosyncratic Vision’ (2016) 125 Yale Law Journal 560.Google Scholar

Goyal, S., Connections: An Introduction to the Economics of Networks (Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Grant, J., ‘Muddy Waters Issues Critical Olam Report’, Financial Times, 27 November 2012.Google Scholar

Grantham, R., ‘The Doctrinal Basis of the Rights of Company Shareholders’ (1998) 57 Cambridge Law Journal 554.Google Scholar

Graziadei, M., ‘Comparative Law as the Study of Transplants and Receptions’ in Reimann, M. and Zimmerman, R., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Greenfield, K., The Failure of Corporate Law: Fundamental Flaws and Progressive Possibilities (University of Chicago Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Grossman, N., ‘Turning a Short-Term Fling into a Long-Term Commitment: Board Duties in a New Era’ (2010) 43 University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 905.Google Scholar

Gul, F. A., ‘Auditors’ Response to Political Connections and Cronyism in Malaysia’ (2006) 44 Journal of Accounting Research 931.Google Scholar

Gupta, A. and Menon, S., ‘Top Asset Management Companies, Including UTI Mutual, Tata Mutual, Abstain from Voting in Corporate Resolutions’, Economic Times, 7 August 2012.Google Scholar

Hafeez, M. M., ‘Domination of Family Owned Corporations and Problems of Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets’ (2014) 4 South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law 9.Google Scholar

Hamdani, A. and Yafeh, Y., ‘Institutional Investors as Minority Shareholders’ (2013) Review of Finance 691.Google Scholar

Hannigan, B., Company Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2012).Google Scholar

Hannigan, B., Company Law (Oxford University Press, 4th ed., 2016).Google Scholar

Hannigan, B., Company Law (Oxford University Press, 5th ed., 2018).Google Scholar

Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘The End of History for Corporate Law’ (2001) 89 Georgetown Law Journal 439.Google Scholar

Hansmann, H., ‘Ownership of the Firm’ (1988) 4 Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 267.Google Scholar

Hart, O. and Zingales, L., ‘Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value’ (2017) 2 Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting 247.Google Scholar

Hatton, K. J. and Pistor, K., ‘Maximizing Autonomy in the Shadow of Great Powers: The Political Economy of Sovereign Wealth Funds’ (2012) 50 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 47.Google Scholar

Hawley, J. P., Hoepner, A. G. F., Johnson, K. L., Sandberg, J. and Waitzer, E. J. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Institutional Investment and Fiduciary Duty (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Haydock, R. S., ‘Civil Justice and Dispute Resolution in the Twenty-First Century: Mediation and Arbitration Now and for the Future’ (2000) 27 William Mitchell Law Review 745.Google Scholar

Heard, J. E. and Sherman, H. D., Conflicts of Interest in the Proxy Voting System (Investor Responsibility Research Center, 1987).Google Scholar

Heckman, J. J., Nelson, R. L. and Cabatingan, L. (eds.), Global Perspectives on the Rule of Law (Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Heng, P. K., ‘The New Economic Policy and the Chinese Community in Peninsula Malaysia’ (1997) 35 Developing Economies 262.Google Scholar

Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., van Essen, M. and van Oosterhout, J. H., ‘Meta-Analyzing Ownership Concentration and Firm Performance in Asia: Towards a More Fine-Grained Understanding’ (2009) 26 Asia Pacific Journal of Management 481.Google Scholar

Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar

Hill, J. G., ‘Images of the Shareholder’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar

Hill, J. G., ‘Good Activist/Bad Activist: The Rise of International Stewardship Codes’ (2018) 41 Seattle University Law Review 497.Google Scholar

HKEX Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar

HKEX Cash Market Transactions Survey 2013/4 (2015).Google Scholar

HKEX Cash Market Transactions Survey 2014/5 (2016).Google Scholar

HKEX Cash Market Transactions Survey 2016 (2017).Google Scholar

Ho, J. S., ‘Bringing Responsible Ownership to the Financial Market of Hong Kong: How Effective Could it Be’ (2016) 16 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 437.Google Scholar

Ho, L., ‘Good Faith and Fiduciary Duty in English Law’ (2010) 4 Journal of Equity 29.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. and Bond, M. H., ‘The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth’ (1988) 16 Organizational Dynamics 5.Google Scholar

Holderness, C. G., ‘The Myth of Diffuse Ownership in the United States’ (2009) 22 Review of Financial Studies 1377.Google Scholar

Hong Kong Companies Registry, A Guide to Directors’ Duties (2009).Google Scholar

Hong Kong Principles of Responsible Shareholder Ownership (2016).Google Scholar

Hong, H., Kubik, J. D. and Stein, J. C., ‘Thy Neighbor’s Portfolio: Word of Mouth Effects in the Holdings and Trades of Money Managers’ (2005) 60 Journal of Finance 2801.Google Scholar

Hongkong Land Holdings Limited Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar

Hongkong Land Holdings Limited Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar

Hooy, C. W. and Tee, C. M., ‘Directors’ Pay Performance: A Study on Malaysian Government Linked Companies’ (2009), available at https://cenpris.usm.my/index.php/papers/downloadable-papers/category/1-year-2009?download=41:cenpris-wp-110-09.Google Scholar

Hopt, K. J., ‘Comparative Company Law’ in Reimann, M. and Zimmerman, R., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar

HSBC Holdings Plc Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar

Hu, H. and Black, B., ‘Equity and Debt Decoupling and Empty Voting II: Importance and Extensions’ (2008) 156 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 625.Google Scholar

Hu, H. T. C. and Black, B. S., ‘Empty Voting and Hidden (Morphable) Ownership: Taxonomy, Implications and Reforms’ (2006) 63 The Business Lawyer 1011.Google Scholar

Hu, H. T. C. and Black, B. S., ‘Hedge Funds, Insiders, and the Decoupling of Economic and Voting Ownership: Empty Voting and Hidden (Morphable) Ownership’ (2007) 13 Journal of Corporate Finance 343.Google Scholar

Hu, H. T. C. and Black, B. S., ‘The New Vote Buying: Empty Voting and Hidden (Morphable) Ownership’ (2006) 79 Southern California Law Review 811.Google Scholar

Huang, R. H. and Howson, N. C. (eds.), Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Law: China and the World (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Huang, G. and Song, F. M., ‘The Financial and Operating Performance of China’s Newly Listed H-Firms’ (2005) 13 Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 53.Google Scholar

Huang, R. H. and Howson, N. C. (eds.), Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Law: China and the World (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Hughes, J., ‘Activist Investors Accelerate Efforts to Build Influence in Asia: Hedge Fund Efforts to Shift Policy Are Rubbing off on Regular Shareholders’, Financial Times, 26 July 2016.Google Scholar

Hulme, S., ‘The Basic Duty of Trustees of Superannuation Trusts – Fair to One, Fair to All?’ (2000) 14 Trust Law International 130.Google Scholar

Hung, M., Wong, T. J. and Zhang, T., ‘Political Considerations in the Decision of Chinese SOEs to list in Hong Kong’ (2012) 53 Journal of Accounting and Economics 435.Google Scholar

Hylton, K. N., ‘Agreements to Waive or to Arbitrate Legal Claims: An Economic Analysis’ (2000) 8 Supreme Court Economic Review 209.Google Scholar

Ibrahim, H. and Samad, F. A., ‘Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Performance of Public-Listed Family-Ownership in Malaysia’ (2011) 3 International Journal of Economics and Finance 105.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, D., Lakonishok, J. and Vermaelen, T., ‘Market Underreaction to Open Market Share Repurchases’ (1995) 39 Journal of Financial Economics 181.Google Scholar

Iliev, P. and Lowry, M., ‘Are Mutual Funds Active Voters?’ (2015) 28 Review of Financial Studies 446.Google Scholar

Iliev, P., Lins, K. V., Miller, D. P. and Roth, L., ‘Shareholder Voting and Corporate Governance Around the World’ (2015) 28 Review of Financial Studies 2167.Google Scholar

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Annual Report (2016)Google Scholar

InGovern Research Services, India Proxy Season 2017: An Analysis (2017).Google Scholar

Institutional Investor Council Malaysia, Investor Stewardship and Future Key Priorities 2016 (2016).Google Scholar

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, Guidelines on Stewardship Code for Insurers in India (2017).Google Scholar

Investment Management Association of Singapore Annual Report (2017).Google Scholar

Ireland, P. ‘Financialisation and Corporate Governance’ (2009) 60 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 1.Google Scholar

Ireland, P., ‘Capitalism without the Capitalists: The Joint Stock Company Share and the Emergence of the Modern Doctrine of Separate Legal Personality’ (1996) 17 Legal History 41.Google Scholar

Ireland, P., ‘Corporate Schizophrenia: The Institutional Origins of Corporate Social Irresponsibility’ in Boeger, N. and Villiers, C. (eds.), Shaping the Corporate Landscape (Hart Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar

Ireland, P., ‘Finance and the Origins of Modern Company Law’ in Baars, G. and Spicer, A., The Corporation: A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Ireland, P., ‘Property and Contract in Contemporary Corporate Theory’ (2003) 23 Legal Studies 453.Google Scholar

Ireland, P., ‘Company Law and the Myth of Shareholder Ownership’ (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 32.Google Scholar

Ireland, P., ‘Limited Liability, Shareholder Rights and the Problem of Corporate Irresponsibility’ (2010) 34 Cambridge Journal of Economics 837.Google Scholar

Isa, M. and Lee, S. P., ‘The Performance of Government-Linked Companies in Malaysia’, (2016) 24 Capital Markets Review 1.Google Scholar

Isaksson, M. and Çelik, S., ‘Institutional Investors as Owners: Who Are They and What Do They Do?’ (2013), available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3v1dvmfk42-en.Google Scholar

Isaksson, M. and Çelik, S., ‘Who Cares? Corporate Governance in Today’s Equity Markets’ (2013), available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k47zw5kdnmp-en.Google Scholar

Ismail, Z. I., ‘GHope Fails in Bid to Sell Negara Prop’, Business Times, 22 November 2005.Google Scholar

ISS 2018 Asia-Pacific Proxy Voting Guidelines Updates: Benchmark Policy Changes for Japan, China, Hong Kong, India, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan (2017).Google Scholar

ISS Hong Kong Proxy Voting Guidelines: 2017 Benchmark Policy Recommendations (2016).Google Scholar

ITC Ltd. Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar

Jaafar, S. B., James, K. and Wahab, E. A. A., ‘Remuneration Committee and Director Remuneration in Family-Owned Companies: Evidence from Malaysia’ (2012) 8 International Review of Business Research Papers 17.Google Scholar

Jackson, H. E. and Roe, M. J., ‘Public and Private Enforcement of Securities Laws: Resource-Based Evidence’ (2009) 93 Journal of Financial Economics 207.Google Scholar

Jacoby, S. M., ‘Finance and Labor: Perspectives on Risk, Inequality and Democracy’ (2008) 30 Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 17.Google Scholar

Jagannathan, R., ‘Why Only CIL? Here Are 9 Other PSU Boards Investors Can Sue’, First Post, 20 December 2014.Google Scholar

Jaggi, B. and Tsui, J., ‘Insider Trading, Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: Empirical Evidence Based on Hong Kong Firms’ (2007) 18 Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 192.Google Scholar

Jain, A., ‘India Needs to Free up Judicial Time, Address Delays to Make Doing Business Here Easy’, LiveLaw.In, 3 February 2018.Google Scholar

Jain, S., Blackford, B., Dabney, D. and Small, J., ‘What Is the Optimal Balance in the Relative Roles of Management, Directors, and Investors in the Governance of Public Corporations?’ (2014), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2407716.Google Scholar

Jameson, M., Prevost, A. and Puthenpurackal, J., ‘Controlling Shareholders, Board Structure, and Firm Performance: Evidence from India’ (2014) 27 Journal of Corporate Finance 1.Google Scholar

Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H., ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure’ (1976) 3 Journal of Financial Economics 305.Google Scholar

Jiang, G. and Wang, H., ‘Should Earnings Thresholds Be Used as Delisting Criteria?’ (2008) 27 Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 409.Google Scholar

Jiang, Y. and Peng, M. W., ‘Are Family Ownership and Controlling Large Firms Good, Bad or Irrelevant?’ (2011) 28 Asia Pacific Journal of Management 15.Google Scholar

Johl, S., Jackling, B. and Joshi, M., ‘Family Generation, Leadership and Performance: The Role of Outside Directors in Indian Family Firms’ (2010) 8 Corporate Ownership and Control 646.Google Scholar

John, A., ‘What Is Bank of East Asia and Elliott’s Dispute About?’, South China Morning Post, 18 July 2017.Google Scholar

Johnson, L., ‘Relating Fiduciary Duties to Corporate Personhood and Corporate Purpose’ in Smith, D. G. and Gold, A. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Fiduciary Law (Edward Elgar, 2018).Google Scholar

Johnson, S. and Mitton, T., ‘Cronyism and Capital Controls: Evidence from Malaysia’ (2003) 67 Journal of Financial Economics 351.Google Scholar

Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., ‘Tunneling’ (2000) 90 American Economic Review 22.Google Scholar

Jones, M. A., Marshall, S. D., Mitchell, R. and Ramsay, I. M., ‘Company Directors’ Views Regarding Stakeholders (Research Report)’ (2007), available at http://cclsr.law.unimelb.edu.au/go/centre-activities/research/research-reports-and-research-papers/index/cfm.Google Scholar

Juliarto, A., Tower, G., Van der Zahn, M. and Rusmin, R., ‘Managerial Ownership Influencing Tunnelling Behaviour’ (2013) 7 Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal 1.Google Scholar

Kahan, M., ‘The State of State Competition for Incorporations’ in Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Kahan, M. and Rock, E. B., ‘When the Government Is the Controlling Shareholder’ (2011) 89 Texas Law Review 1293.Google Scholar

Kahn-Freund, O., ‘On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’ (1974) 37 Modern Law Review 1.Google Scholar

Kaldor, N., ‘Public or Private Enterprise – the Issues to Be Considered’ in Baumol, W. J. (eds.), Public and Private Enterprises in a Mixed Economy (Palgrave Macmillan, 1980).Google Scholar

Kali, R. and Sarkar, J., ‘Diversification and Tunnelling: Evidence from Indian Business Groups’ (2011) 39 Journal of Comparative Economics 349.Google Scholar

Kanter, R. M., ‘How Great Companies Think Differently’ (2011) 89 Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar

Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I. and Vihma, A., ‘Comparing the Legitimacy and Effectiveness of Global Hard and Soft Law: An Analytical Framework’, (2009) 3 Regulation & Governance 400.Google Scholar

Karmel, R. S., ‘Should A Duty to the Corporation Be Imposed on Institutional Shareholders’ (2004) 60 Business Lawyer 1.Google Scholar

Kastiel, K., ‘Against All Odds: Hedge Fund Activism in Controlled Companies’ (2016) 2016 Columbia Business Law Review 60.Google Scholar

Katelouzou, D. and Siems, M., ‘Disappearing Paradigms in Shareholder Protection: Leximetric Evidence for 30 countries, 1900–2013’ (2015) 15 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 127.Google Scholar

Kaur, G., ‘EPF Holds the Key in MISC Buyout’, The Star Online, 11 March 2013.Google Scholar

Kay, J., ‘The Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-term Decision-Making’ (2011), available at www.gov.uk/government/consultations/the-kay-review-of-uk-equity-markets-and-long-term-decision-making.Google Scholar

Kaya, O., ‘High-Frequency Trading: Reaching the Limits’ (2016), available at www.dbresearch.com/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_EN-PROD/PROD0000000000406105/High-frequency_trading%3A_Reaching_the_limits.pdf.Google Scholar

Kazmin, A., ‘Indian Companies Facing Wave of Shareholder Activism’, Financial Times, 5 December 2014.Google Scholar

Keay, A. and Adamopoulou, R., ‘Shareholder Value and UK Companies: A Positivist Inquiry’ (2012) 13 European Business Organization Law Review 1.Google Scholar

Keay, A. and Loughrey, J., ‘An Assessment of the Present State of Statutory Derivative Proceedings’ in Loughrey, J. (eds.), Directors’ Duties and Shareholder Litigation in the Wake of the Financial Crisis (Edward Elgar, 2013).Google Scholar

Keay, A., ‘Ascertaining the Corporate Objective: An Entity Maximisation and Sustainability Model’ (2008) 71 Modern Law Review 663.Google Scholar

Keay, A., The Corporate Objective (Edward Elgar, 2011).Google Scholar

Keay, A., The Enlightened Shareholder Value Principle and Corporate Governance (Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Keay, A., Board Accountability in Corporate Governance (Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar

Kelly, G. and Parkinson, J., ‘The Conceptual Foundations of the Company: A Pluralist Approach’ in Parkinson, J., Kelly, G. and Gamble, A. (eds.), The Political Economy of the Company (Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar

Kershaw, D., Company Law in Context: Text and Materials (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2012).Google Scholar

Khan, M. A. A., ‘Corporate Governance and the Role of Institutional Investors in India’ (2006) 7 Journal of Asia-Pacific Business 37.Google Scholar

Khanna, S., ‘The Transformation of India’s Public Sector’ (2015) 50 Economic & Political Weekly 47.Google Scholar

Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. G., ‘Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups’ (2000) 55 Journal of Finance 867.Google Scholar

Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. G., ‘The Evolution of Concentrated Ownership in India’ in Morck, R. K. (eds.), A History of Corporate Governance Around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report, 2005).Google Scholar

Khanna, T. and Rivkin, J. W., ‘Estimating the Performance Effects of Business Groups in Emerging Markets’ (2000) 22 Strategic Management Journal 45.Google Scholar

Khanna, T. and Yafeh, Y., ‘Business Groups and Risk Sharing Around the World’ (2005) 78 Journal of Business 301.Google Scholar

Khanna, V., ‘Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Laws in India: The Arrival of the Class Action?’ in Huang, R. H. and Howson, N. C. (eds), Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Law: China and the World (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Khanna, V. and Varottil, U., ‘The Rarity of Derivative Actions in India: Reasons and Consequences’ in Puchniak, D. W., Baum, H. and Ewing-Chow, M. (eds.), The Derivative Action in Asia: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Khanna, V., ‘Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Laws in India: The Arrival of the Class Action?’ in Huang, R. H. and Howson, N. C. (eds.), Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Law: China and the World (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Kirby, C. M. G., ‘Malaysia – the Judiciary and the Rule of Law’ (1988) 41 International Commission of Jurists Review 40.Google Scholar

Klausner, M., ‘The “Corporate Contract” Today’ in Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Klein, A. and Zur, E., ‘Entrepreneurial Shareholder Activism: Hedge Funds and other Private Investors’ (2009) 64 Journal of Finance 187.Google Scholar

Klein, A. and Zur, E., ‘The Impact of Hedge Fund Activism on the Target Firm’s Existing Bondholders’ (2011) 24 Review of Financial Studies 1735.Google Scholar

Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H. and Rock, E., The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2009).Google Scholar

Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Pargendler, M., Ringe, W. G. and Rock, E., The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 2017).Google Scholar

Krehmeyer, D. and Orsagh, M., ‘Breaking the Short-Term Cycle’ (2006), available at www.corporate-ethics.org/pdf/Short-termism_Report.pdf.Google Scholar

Krouse, S., Benoit, D. and McGinty, T., ‘Meet the New Corporate Power Brokers: Passive Investors’, Wall Street Journal, 24 October 2016.Google Scholar

Krueger, A. O., ‘Government Failures in Development’ (1990) 4 Journal of Economic Perspectives 9.Google Scholar

KWAP Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar

Kwok, T., ‘Why Hong Kong People Should Support Move to End Filibustering in Legislative Council’, South China Morning Post, 1 December 2017.Google Scholar

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., ‘The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins’ (2008) 46 Journal of Economic Literature 285.Google Scholar

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., ‘Corporate Ownership Around the World’ (1999) 54 Journal of Finance 471.Google Scholar

La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., ‘What Works in Securities Laws?’ (2006) 61 Journal of Finance 1.Google Scholar

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., ‘Law and Finance’, (1998) 106 Journal of Political Economy 1113.Google Scholar

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., ‘Legal Determinants of External Finance’ (1997) 52 Journal of Finance 1131.Google Scholar

Lady, Hale, ‘Fifty Years of the Law Commission: Then, Now and Next’ in Dyson, M., Lee, J. and Stark, S. W. (eds.), Fifty Years of the Law Commissions: The Dynamics of Law Reform (Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar

Lam, T. Y. and Lee, S. K., ‘Family Ownership, Board Committees and Firm Performance: Evidence from Hong Kong’ (2012) 12 Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 353.Google Scholar

Lamar, M., ‘Hedge Fund Elliott Calls on Bank of East Asia to Sell’, Wall Street Journal, 5 February 2016.Google Scholar

Lan, L. L., Essentials of Corporate Law and Governance in Singapore (Sweet & Maxwell, 2018).Google Scholar

Lan, L. L. and Varottil, U., ‘Shareholder Empowerment in Controlled Companies: the Case of Singapore’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar

Langford, R., ‘Best Interests: Multifaceted But Not Unbounded’ (2016) 75 Cambridge Law Journal 505.Google Scholar

Langford, R., ‘The Duty of Directors to Act Bona Fide in the Interests of the Company: A Positive Fiduciary Duty? Australia and the UK Compared’ (2011) 11 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 215.Google Scholar

Langford, R. T. and Ramsay, I. M., ‘Directors’ Duty to Act in the Interests of the Company – Subjective or Objective’ (2015) Journal of Business Law 173.Google Scholar

Langford, R. T., Directors’ Duties: Principles and Application (Federation Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Larcker, D. F., McCall, A. L. and Ormazabal, G., ‘Outsourcing Shareholder Voting to Proxy Advisory Firms’ (2015) 28 Journal of Law and Economics 173.Google Scholar

Lau, J. and Mitchell, T., ‘PCCW’s Property Buy-out Plan Rejected’, Financial Times, 18 April 2008.Google Scholar

Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong Report on Class Actions (2012).Google Scholar

Lazonick, W. and O‘Sullivan, M., ‘Maximising Shareholder Value: A New Ideology for Corporate Governance’ (2000) 29 Economy & Society 13.Google Scholar

Lean, H. H., Ting, I. W. K. and Kweh, Q. L., ‘Ownership Concentration, Family Ownership and Leverage: Evidence from Malaysia’ (2015) 52 Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies 117.Google Scholar

Lee, H. P. and Foo, R., ‘The Malaysian Judiciary: A Sisyphean Quest for Redemption?’ in Lee, H. P. and Pittard, M. (eds.), Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Lee, H. P. and Pittard, M. (eds.), Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Lee, K. and Barnes, L., ‘Corporate Governance and Performance in Hong Kong Founded Family Firms: Evidence From the Hang Seng Composite Industry Index’ (2017) 51 Journal of Developing Areas 410.Google Scholar

Legrand, P., ‘The Impossibility of “Legal Transplants”’ (1997) 4 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 111.Google Scholar

Lehavy, R., Li, F. and Merkley, K. J., ‘The Effect of Annual Report Readability on Analyst Following and the Properties of Their Earnings Forecasts’ (2011) 86 Accounting Review 1087.Google Scholar

Letter from Lebowitz, A. D. to Fandl, H. (23 February 1988).Google Scholar

Leung, S., Richardson, G. and Jaggi, B., ‘Corporate Board and Board Committee Independence, Firm Performance, and Family Ownership Concentration: An Analysis Based on Hong Kong Firms’ (2014) 10 Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 16.Google Scholar

Li, F., ‘Annual Report Readability, Current Earnings, and Earnings Persistence’ (2008) 45 Journal of Accounting and Economics 221.Google Scholar

Li, T., ‘Outsourcing Corporate Governance: Conflicts of Interest and Competition in the Proxy Advisory Industry’ (2016) Management Science 1.Google Scholar

Licht, A. N., ‘Motivation, Information, Negotiation: Why Fiduciary Accountability Cannot be Negotiable’ in Smith, D. G. and Gold, A. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Fiduciary Law (Edward Elgar, 2018).Google Scholar

Licht, A. N., ‘Lord Eldon Redux: Information Asymmetry, Accountability and Fiduciary Loyalty’ (2017) 37 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 770.Google Scholar

Liebman, B. L. and Milhaupt, C. J., ‘Reputational Sanctions in China’s Securities Market’ (2008) 108 Columbia Law Review 929.Google Scholar

Liew, C. W., Alfan, E. and Devi, S., ‘Family Firms, Expropriation and Firm Value: Evidence of the Role of Independent Directors’ Tenure in Malaysia’ (2017) 6 International Journal of Organizational Leadership 42.Google Scholar

Lim, B. L. and Yen, S. H., ‘Agency Problem and Expropriation of Minority Shareholders’ (2011) 48 Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies 37.Google Scholar

Lim, E., ‘Controlling Shareholders and Fiduciary Duties in Asia’ (2018) 18 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 113.Google Scholar

Lim, E., ‘Judicial Intervention in Directors’ Decision-Making Process: Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006’ (2018) Journal of Business Law 169.Google Scholar

Lin-Wen, L. and Milhaupt, C. J., ‘We Are the (National) Champions: Understanding the Mechanisms of State Capitalism in China’ (2013) 65 Stanford Law Review 697.Google Scholar

Lintner, J., ‘The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risk Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets’ (1965) 47 Review of Economics and Statistics 13.Google Scholar

Lo, S. H. C. and Qu, C. Z., Law of Companies in Hong Kong (Sweet & Maxwell, 2nd ed., 2015).Google Scholar

Loderer, C., Roth, L., Waelchli, U. and Joerg, P., ‘Shareholder Value: Principles, Declarations, and Actions’ (2010) 39 Financial Management 5.Google Scholar

Myners, Lord, Remarks at Financial Services Secretary to the Treasury, NAPF Annual Investment Conference (2009).Google Scholar

Nicholls, Lord, ‘Trustees and their Broader Community: Where Duty, Morality and Ethics Converge’ (1996) 70 Australian Law Journal 205.Google Scholar

Walker, Lord, ‘Developing the Common Law: How Far Is too Far’ (2013) 27 Melbourne University Law Review 232.Google Scholar

Loughrey, J. (eds.), Directors’ Duties and Shareholder Litigation in the Wake of the Financial Crisis (Edward Elgar, 2013).Google Scholar

Lund, D., ‘The Case Against Passive Shareholder Voting’ (2018) 43 Journal of Corporation Law 493.Google Scholar

Lydenberg, S., ‘Reason, Rationality and Fiduciary Duty’ (2014) 119 Journal of Business Ethics 365.Google Scholar

Ma, S. Y., ‘Role of the State in Chinese Enterprises Listed in Hong Kong’ (2002) 15 Pacific Review 279.Google Scholar

Magill, M., Quinzii, M. and Rochet, J. C., ‘A Theory of the Stakeholder Corporation’ (2015) 83 Econometrica 1685.Google Scholar

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar

Mak, Y. T. and Chew, Y. H., ‘The Singapore Report on Shareholder Meetings: Dawn of Activism’ (2017), available at https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/c48702_9b302c5fc5574cd2b89d02936db8abc3.pdf.Google Scholar

Mak, Y. T. and Chew, Y. H., ‘The Singapore Report on Shareholder Meetings: Shareholders Awaken?’ (2016), available at http://governanceforstakeholders.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Shareholder-Meetings-Volume-2-updated.pdf.Google Scholar

Mak, Y. T., ‘Shining More Light on Remuneration Disclosures and Practices in Singapore’ (2017), available at http://governanceforstakeholders.com/2017/12/01/shining-more-light-on-remuneration-disclosures-and-practices-in-singapore/Google Scholar

Malaysian Code for Institutional Investors (2014).Google Scholar

Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (2017).Google Scholar

Malenko, N. and Shen, Y., ‘The Role of Proxy Advisory Firms: Evidence from a Regression-Discontinuity Design’ (2016) 29 Review of Financial Studies 3394.Google Scholar

Malkiel, B. G., ‘Efficient Market Hypothesis’ in Neuman, P., Milgate, M. and Eatwell, J. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance (Palgrave Macmillan, 1992).Google Scholar

Mallow, M. J. and Sethi, J., ‘Engagement: The Missing Middle Approach in the Bebchuk-Strine Debate’ (2016) 12 NYU Journal of Law and Business 385.Google Scholar

Marriage, M., ‘Passive Funds Take Third of US Market’, Financial Times, 11 September 2016.Google Scholar

Massa, M. and Simonov, A., ‘Shareholder Homogeneity and Firm Value: The Disciplining Role of Non-Controlling Shareholders’ (2006), available at https://faculty.insead.edu/massimo-massa/documents/pap8b.pdf.Google Scholar

Masulis, R. W., Pham, P. K. and Zein, J., ‘Ownership and Control in Family Business Groups Around the World’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar

Mayer, C., ‘Who’s Responsible for an Irresponsible Business: An Assessment’ (2017) 33 Oxford Review of Economic Policy 157.Google Scholar

Mayer, C., Prosperity: Better Business Makes the Greater Good (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Mayer, C., Firm Commitment: Why the Corporation Is Failing Us and How to Restore Trust in It (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

McCahery, J. A., Moerland, P., Raaijmakers, T. and Renneboog, L. (eds.), Corporate Governance Regimes – Convergence and Diversity (Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

McCahery, J. A., Sautner, J. and Starks, L. T. ‘Behind the Scenes: The Corporate Governance Preferences of Institutional Investors’ (2016) 71 Journal of Finance 2905.Google Scholar

McDermott, G. A., Embedded Politics: Industrial Networks & Institutional Change in Postcommunism (University of Michigan Press, 2003).Google Scholar

McDonald, B., ‘Law Reform in Private Law: The Role of Statutes in Supplementing or Supplanting the Common Law’ in Dyson, M., Lee, J. and Stark, S. W. (eds.), Fifty Years of the Law Commissions: The Dynamics of Law Reform (Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar

McGhee, J., Snell’s Equity (Sweet & Maxwell, 32nd ed., 2010).Google Scholar

Megarry, R., ‘Investing Pension Funds: The Mineworkers Case’ in Youdan, T. G., Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts (Carswell, 1989).Google Scholar

Merton, R. C., ‘A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information’ (1987) 42 Journal of Finance 483.Google Scholar

Meulbroek, L. K., ‘An Empirical Analysis of Illegal Insider Trading’ (1992) 47 Journal of Finance 1661.Google Scholar

Mezzanotte, F. E., ‘The Unconvincing Rise of the Statutory Derivative Action in Hong Kong: Evidence from Its First 10 Years of Enforcement’ (2017) 17 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 469.Google Scholar

Milhaupt, C. J., ‘Chinese Corporate Capitalism in Comparative Context’ in Chen, W. (ed), The Beijing Consensus? How China Has Changed the Western Ideas of Law and Economic Development (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Miller, P. B., ‘A Theory of Fiduciary Liability’ (2011) 56 McGill Law Journal 235.Google Scholar

Miller, P. B., ‘The Fiduciary Relationship’ in Gold, A. S. and Miller, P. B. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Mohd-Fahmi, F. and Omar, N. B., ‘Corporate Reporting on Minority Shareholders Information and Its Implication on Shareholders Activism in Malaysia’ (2005) 3 Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 17.Google Scholar

Mohd-Sulaiman, A. N. and Othman, E., Malaysia Company Law: Principles and Practices (Wolters Kluwer, 2015).Google Scholar

Mohd-Sulaiman, A. N. and Rachagan, S., ‘Shareholder Primacy, Controlling Shareholders and Malaysia’s Companies Act 2016’ (2017) 17 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 203.Google Scholar

Moore, M., ‘Private Ordering and Public Policy: The Paradoxical Foundations of Corporate Contractarianism’ (2014) 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 693.Google Scholar

Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D. and Yeung, B., ‘Corporate Governance, Economic Entrenchment and Growth’ (2005) 63 Journal of Financial Economics 215.Google Scholar

Morck, R. K. (eds.), A History of Corporate Governance Around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers (National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report, 2005).Google Scholar

Morck, R. K. (eds.), Concentrated Corporate Ownership (University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Morgan, D. P. and Stiroh, K. J., ‘Bond Market Discipline of Banks: Is the Market Tough Enough?’ (2009), available at www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr95.pdf.Google Scholar

Mortimore, S. (eds.), Company Directors, Duties, Liabilities and Remedies (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Musacchio, A. and Lazzarini, S. G., Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond (Harvard University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

MSWG Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar

Mulheron, R., ‘From Representative Rule to Class Action: Steps Rather Than Leaps’ (2005) 24 Civil Justice Quarterly 424.Google Scholar

Mulheron, R., The Class Action in Common Law Legal Systems: A Comparative Perspective (Hart Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar

Musa, M. A., ‘The Influence of Institutional Shareholder Activism as a Corporate Governance Monitoring Mechanism in Malaysia’ (2012) 6 International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering 3110.Google Scholar

Musacchio, A., ‘Sovereign Wealth Funds: Barbarians at the Gate or White Knights of Globalization? (TN).’ (2013), available at www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=44506.Google Scholar

Musacchio, A., and Lazzarini, S. G., ‘Leviathan in Business: Varieties of State Capitalism and Their Implications for Economic Performance’ (2012), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2070942.Google Scholar

Mustafa, N. H., Latif, R. A. and Taliyang, S. M. ‘Expropriation of Minority Shareholders’ Rights: Evidence from Malaysia’ (2011) 13 International Journal of Business and Social Science 215.Google Scholar

Najid, N. A. and Rahman, , Rashidah, R. A., ‘Government Ownership and Performance of Malaysian Government-Linked Companies’ (2011) 61 International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 42.Google Scholar

Naniwadekar, M. and Varottil, U., ‘The Stakeholder Approach Towards Directors’ Duties Under Indian Company Law: A Comparative Analysis’ (2016), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2822109.Google Scholar

National Association of Pension Funds, ‘Institutional Investment in the UK: Six Years On’ (2007), available at www.plsa.co.uk/portals/0/Documents/0016_Institutional_investment_in_the_UK_six_years_on_0107.pdf.Google Scholar

National Stock Exchange of India Limited 23rd Annual Report (2015).Google Scholar

National Stock Exchange of India Limited 24th Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar

Neuman, P., Milgate, M. and Eatwell, J. (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Money and Finance (Palgrave Macmillan, 1992).Google Scholar

Neville, M., ‘Shareholder Activism: The Dubious Shareholder Revisited’ in Birkmose, H. S. (eds.), Shareholders’ Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2017).Google Scholar

Ng, S. H., Shrives, P. and Yeoh, K. K., ‘Profit Redistribution in Family-Controlled, Group-Affiliated Publicly-Listed Corporations in Malaysia’ (2013) 10 Corporate Ownership and Control 142.Google Scholar

Ng, S. H., Yeoh, K., Lau, C. K. and Shrives, P., ‘Factors Influencing the Performance of Family-Controlled Publicly-Listed Firms in Malaysia’ (2012) 1 Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research 179.Google Scholar

Nili, Y., ‘The “New Insiders”: Rethinking Independent Directors’ Tenure’ (2016) 68 Hastings Law Journal 97.Google Scholar

Nolan, R. and Conaglen, M., ‘Good Faith: What Does It Mean for Fiduciaries, and What Does It Tell Us About Them’ in Harding, M. and Bant, E. (eds.), Exploring Private Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

OECD, State Owned Enterprises in India: Reviewing the Evidence (2009).Google Scholar

OECD, The Role of Institutional Investors in Promoting Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Governance (2011).Google Scholar

OECD, Public Enforcement and Corporate Governance in Asia – Guidance and Good Practices (2014).Google Scholar

OECD Corporate Governance Factbook (2017).Google Scholar

Olson, M., The Rise and Decline of Nations (Yale University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Omran, M., Atrill, P. and Pointon, J., ‘Shareholders Versus Stakeholders: Corporate Mission Statements and Investor Returns’ (2002) 11 Business Ethics: A European Review 319.Google Scholar

Orts, E. W., Business Persons: A Legal Theory of the Firm (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Othmana, S. and Borges, W. G., ‘Shareholder Activism in Malaysia: Is It Effective?’ (2015) 172 Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 427.Google Scholar

Oyedele, A., ‘Here Is the Letter the World’s Largest Investor, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, Just Sent to CEOs Everywhere’, Business Insider, 24 January 2017.Google Scholar

Pacces, A. M., ‘Controlling and Corporate Controller’s Misbehavior’ (2011) 11 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 177.Google Scholar

Pagano, M., Panetta, F. and Zingales, L., ‘Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis’ (1998) 53 Journal of Finance 27.Google Scholar

Pagano, M., Röell, A. A. and Zechner, J., ‘The Geography of Equity Listing: Why Do Companies List Abroad?’ (2002) 57 Journal of Finance 2651.Google Scholar

Palmer, P. and Scanlan, C., Socially Responsible Investment: A Guide for Pension Schemes and Charities (Key Haven Publications, 2005).Google Scholar

Panageas, S., ‘The Neoclassical Theory of Investment in Speculative Markets’ (2005), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=720464.Google Scholar

Pandey, R. ‘Effects of Controlling Family Status, Family-Impacted Governance and Top Management Characteristics on Financial and Social Performance of Listed companies in India’ (2012), available at https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:161632 Google Scholar

Pandey, R., Taylor, D. and Joshi, M., ‘Governance of Large Family Companies in Traditional and New Economy Industries in India: Effects on Financial Performance’ (2011) 8 Corporate Ownership and Control 108.Google Scholar

Pargendler, M., ‘State Ownership and Corporate Governance’ (2011) 80 Fordham Law Review 2917.Google Scholar

Pargendler, M., Musacchio, A. and Lazzarini, S. G., ‘The Puzzle of Private Investment in State Controlled Firms’ (2013), Harvard Business School WP 13–071.Google Scholar

Parkinson, J., Kelly, G. and Gamble, A. (eds.), The Political Economy of the Company (Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar

Parrino, R., Sias, R. W. and Starks, L. T., ‘Voting with Their Feet: Institutional Ownership Changes Around CEO Turnovers’ (2003) 68 Journal of Financial Economics 3.Google Scholar

Pearce, J. A. II., ‘The Company Mission as a Strategic Tool’ (1982) 23 Sloan Management Review 15.Google Scholar

Penner, J. E. and Smith, H. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Property Law (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Phadnis, S. and Dasl, A., ‘Battle for B’luru Property Lands at Govt’s Doorstep’, Times of India, 19 September 2016.Google Scholar

Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd Annual Report (2014).Google Scholar

Polinsky, A. M. and Shavell, S. M. ‘The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law’ (2000) 38 Journal of Economic Literature 45.Google Scholar

Pool, V. K., Stoffman, N. and Yonker, S. E., ‘The People in Your Neighborhood: Social Interactions and Mutual Fund Portfolios’ (2015) 70 Journal of Finance 2679.Google Scholar

Poterba, J. M. and Summers, L., ‘A CEO Survey of US Companies’ Time Horizons and Hurdle Rates’ (1995) 37 Sloan Management Review 43.Google Scholar

Pretto-Sakmann, A., Boundaries of Personal Property: Shares and Sub-Shares (Hart Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar

Proxy Voting by Investment Advisers, Investment Advisers Act Release No. IA–2106, 68 FR 6585 (2003).Google Scholar

PTI, ‘Independent Directors Aren’t Really “Independent”, Says Sebi Chief’, National Herald, 29 June 2017.Google Scholar

Public Bank BHD Annual Report (2016).Google Scholar

Public Enterprises Survey 2015–2016 (Department of Public Enterprises, Government of India) (2016).Google Scholar

Puchniak, D. W., Baum, H. and Nottage, L. (eds.), Independent Directors in Asia: a Historical, Contextual and Comparative Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Puchniak, D. W. and Lan, L. L., ‘Independent Directors in Singapore: Puzzling Compliance Requiring Explanation’ (2017) 65 American Journal of Comparative Law 265.Google Scholar

Puchniak, D. W., Baum, H. and Ewing-Chow, M. (eds.), The Derivative Action in Asia: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Purag, M. B., Abdullah, A. B. and Bujang, I., ‘Corporate Governance and Capital Structure of Malaysian Family-Owned Companies’ (2016) 11 Journal of Business & Retail Management Research 18.Google Scholar

Qiu, L. X., ‘Which Institutional Investors Monitor? Evidence from Acquisition Activity’ (2006), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=521803.Google Scholar

Rachagan, S. and Mohd-Sulaiman, A. N., ‘Controlling Shareholders: Issues and Challenges for Shareholders’ Empowerment in Directors’ Remuneration in Corporate Malaysia’ (2013) 9 Asian Journal of Comparative Law 267.Google Scholar

Rajan, R. G. and Zingales, L., ‘The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century’ (2003) 69 Journal of Financial Economics 5.Google Scholar

Rajyaakshmi, , ‘Shareholder Activism’ (2014) 10 Parikalpana-KIIT Journal of Management 23.Google Scholar

Ramirez, C. D. and Tan, L. H., ‘Singapore, Inc. Versus the Private Sector: Are Government-Linked Companies Different?’ (2003), available at www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2003/wp03156.pdf Google Scholar

Ramzy, A., ‘Hong Kong’s Courts Have Defended Its Freedoms. Is Beijing Changing That?’, New York Times, 5 February 2018.Google Scholar

Razak, N. H. A., Ahmad, A. and Joher, H. A., ‘Do Government Linked Companies (GLCs) Perform Better than Non-GLCs?’ (2011) 1 Journal of Applied Finance & Banking 213.Google Scholar

Redding, G., Wong, G. Y. Y. and Leung, W. K. W., ‘Hong Kong: Hybrid Capitalism as Catalyst’ in Witt, M. A. and Redding, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Asian Business Systems (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Reddy, Y. R. K., ‘The First Principles of Corporate Governance for Public Enterprises in India’ (2001), available at http://academyofcg.org/firstprinciples.htm.Google Scholar

Reimann, M. and Zimmerman, R., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Reisberg, A., ‘The Role of Institutional Shareholders: Stewardship and the Long-/Short-term Debate’ in Chiu, I. H. Y., McKee, M. and Donovan, A. P. (eds.), The Law on Corporate Governance in Banks (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar

Reisberg, A., ‘The UK Stewardship Code: On the Road to Nowhere?’ (2015) 15 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 217.Google Scholar

Report on Public Sector Undertaking in India (2011).Google Scholar

Responsible Shareholder Engagement: An Indian Stewardship Code, India–UK Financial Partnership (2016).Google Scholar

Reuters, ‘Proxy Advisory Firm ISS Criticises Noble Group on Audit Committee’, Business Times, 13 April 2015.Google Scholar

Richardson, B. J., ‘Fiduciary Relationships for Socially Responsible Investing: A Multinational Perspective’ (2011) 48 American Business Law Journal 597.Google Scholar

Ringe, W. G., ‘Independent Directors: After the Crisis’ (2013) 14 European Business Organization Law Review 401.Google Scholar

Ringe, W. G., ‘Shareholder Activism: A Renaissance’ in Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Ritter, J. R., ‘The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings’ (1991) 46 Journal of Finance 3.Google Scholar

Rock, E., ‘Institutional Investors in Corporate Governance’ in Gordon, J. N. and Ringe, W. G., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Rock, E., ‘Securities Regulation as Lobster Trap: A Credible Commitment Theory of Mandatory Disclosure’ (2002) 23 Cardozo Law Review 675.Google Scholar

Roe, M. J., Political Determinants of Corporate Governance: Political Context, Corporate Impact (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Roe, M. J., ‘Stock Market Short-Termism’s Impact’ (2018), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3171090 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3171090.Google Scholar

Rothberg, B. and Lilien, S., ‘Mutual Funds and Proxy Voting: New Evidence on Corporate Governance’ (2006) 1 Journal of Business & Technology Law 157.Google Scholar

Sabarinathan, G., ‘Securities and Exchange Board of India and the Regulation of the Indian Securities Market’, IIM Bangalore Research Paper No. 309 (2012).Google Scholar

Saez, L., ‘India: From Failed Development State Towards Hybrid Market Capitalisation’ in Witt, M. A. and Redding, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Asian Business Systems (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Safi, M., ‘India’s Top Judges Issue Unprecedented Warning over Integrity of Supreme Court’, Guardian, 12 January 2018.Google Scholar

Saha, J., ‘Essays on Related Party Transactions in India’, PhD Thesis, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.Google Scholar

Saktunasingam, E. and Shanmugam, B., ‘The Consequences of Culture on Shareholder Activism in Malaysia’ (2006) 4 Journal of Applied Management and Accounting Research 45.Google Scholar

Salim, M. R. and Rahman, A., Corporate Governance in Malaysia (Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).Google Scholar

Sarkar, J. and Sarkar, S., ‘Large Shareholder Activism in Corporate Governance in Developing Countries: Evidence from India’ (2000) 1 International Review of Finance 161.Google Scholar

Sarkar, J. and Sarkar, S., Corporate Governance in India (Sage Publications, 2012).Google Scholar

Schanzenbach, M. M. and Sitkoff, R. H., ‘The Law and Economics of Environmental, Social, and Governance Investing by a Fiduciary’, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3244665.Google Scholar

Schmidt, K. and Lutter, M. (eds.), Aktiengesetz (Otto Schmidt, 3rd ed., 2015).Google Scholar

Sealy, L. and Worthington, S., Sealy and Worthington’s Cases and Materials in Company Law (Oxford University Press, 10th ed., 2013).Google Scholar

Securities and Exchange Board of India, (Mutual Funds) Regulations (1996).Google Scholar

Securities and Exchange Board of India, Master Circular for Mutual Funds (2010).Google Scholar

Securities and Exchange Board of India, Amendment to the Equity Listing Agreement – Platform for E-Voting by Shareholders of Listed Companies, Circular CIR/CFD/DIL/6/2012 (2012).Google Scholar

Securities and Futures Commission Hong Kong, Code on Unit Trusts and Mutual Funds (2010).Google Scholar

Securities and Futures Commission Hong Kong, Fund Manager Code of Conduct (2014).Google Scholar

Securities and Futures Commission, ‘SFC Obtains Court Orders for GOME to Receive $420 Million Compensation from Founder and Wife over Breaches in Share Repurchase’, SFC News Release, 7 May 2014.Google Scholar

Securities and Futures Commission, ‘SFC Seeks Court Orders against Chairman, Current and Former Directors of Minth Group Limited’, SFC News Release, 15 April 2014.Google Scholar

Securities Commission Malaysia & Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad, Best Practice Guide in Relation to Independent Advice Letters (2012).Google Scholar

Seligman, J., ‘Equal Protection in Shareholder Voting Rights: The One Common Share, One Vote Controversy’ (1986) 54 George Washington Law Review 687.Google Scholar

Sengupta, A., ‘Hidden Factors That Slow Our Courts and Delay Justice’, The Economic Times, 29 March 2017.Google Scholar

SFC Consultation Conclusions on the Principles of Responsible Ownership (2016).Google Scholar

SGX Market Statistics Report (2018).Google Scholar

Shaffer, G. C. and Pollack, M. A., ‘Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements, and Antagonists in International Governance’ (2010) 94 Minnesota Law Review 706.Google Scholar

Shamsul, A. B., ‘The Economic Dimension of Malay Nationalism – The Socio-Historical Roots of the New Economic Policy and Its Contemporary Implications’ (1997) 35 Developing Economies 240.Google Scholar

Sharif, S. P., Yeoh, K. K. and Khong, K. W., ‘The Acquisition of Valuable Resources by Family-Controlled Companies in Malaysia Through Political Connections of Their Independent Directors’ (2015) 49 The Journal of Developing Areas 309.Google Scholar

Sharma, P. and Rao, A. S., ‘Successor Attributes in Indian and Canadian Family Firms: A Comparative Study’ (2000) 13 Family Business Review 313.Google Scholar

Sharma, S. U., ‘A Study of Small Shareholders’ Attitude Towards Small-Shareholder Activism’ (2016) 9 Indian Journal of Corporate Governance 67.Google Scholar

Sharpe, W. F., ‘Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Condition of Risk’ (1964) 19 Journal of Finance 425.Google Scholar

Shavell, S. ‘The Optimal Structure of Law Enforcement’ (1993) 36 Journal of Law and Economics 255.Google Scholar

Shavell, S., ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution: An Economic Analysis’ (1995) 24 Journal of Legal Studies 1.Google Scholar

Shirley, M. and Nellis, J., ‘Public Enterprise Reform: The Lessons of Experience’ (1991), available at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/156711468779074142/Public-enterprise-reform-the-lessons-of-experience.Google Scholar

Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W., The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures (Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Shleifer, A. and Wolfenzon, D., ‘Investor Protection and Equity Markets’ (2002) 66 Journal of Financial Economics 3.Google Scholar

Siems, M. and Campbell, D., Comparative Company Law: A Case-Based Approach (Hart Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar

Sim, I., Thomsen, S. and Yeong, G., ‘The State as Shareholder: The Case of Singapore’ (2014), available at https://bschool.nus.edu.sg/Portals/0/docs/FinalReport_SOE_1July2014.pdf.Google Scholar

Sindhuja, P. N., ‘Performance and Value Creation: Family Managed Business Versus Non-Family Managed Business’ (2009) 6 IUP Journal of Business Strategy 66.Google Scholar

Singapore (Bloomberg), ‘Activist Investor Quarz Urges Metro Holdings to Return Cash to Shareholders’, Straits Times, 4 October 2016.Google Scholar

Singapore Code of Corporate Governance (2018).Google Scholar

Singapore Stewardship Principles for Responsible Investors (2016).Google Scholar

Singh, S. and Watts, H., ‘Corruption, Inefficiency Eat 25% of CIL output: Sriprakash Jaiswal’ Economic Times, 19 October 2011.Google Scholar

Sjafjell, B. and Richarson, B. J. (eds.), Company Law and Sustainability: Legal Barriers and Opportunities (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Sitkoff, R. H., ‘The Economic Structure of Fiduciary Law’ (2011) 89 Boston University Law Review 1038.Google Scholar

Smith, D. G. and Gold, A. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Fiduciary Law (Edward Elgar, 2018).Google Scholar

Smith, T., Accounting for Growth: Stripping the Camouflage from Company Accounts (Random House Business Books, 1992).Google Scholar

Sneed, E., ‘The Stockholder May Vote as He Pleases: Theory and Fact’ (1960) 22 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 23.Google Scholar

Solomon, S. D., ‘An Activism-Shy BlackRock Throws a Surprise Punch’, New York Times, 5 April 2016.Google Scholar

Song, W. L. and Szewczyk, S. H., ‘Does Coordinated Institutional Investor Activism Reverse the Fortunes of Underperforming Firms?’ (2003) 38 Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 317.Google Scholar

Sorkin, A. R., ‘BlackRock’s Message: Contribute to Society, or Risk Losing Our Support’, New York Times, 15 January 2018.Google Scholar

Spamann, H., ‘The Antidirector Rights Index Revisited’ (2010) 23 Review of Financial Studies 467.Google Scholar

Spedding, L. (ed.), India: The Business Opportunity (Eastern Book Company, 2016).Google Scholar

Spindler, G. and Stilz, E. (eds.), Akitiengesetz (C.H. Beck, 3rd ed., 2015).Google Scholar

Srinivasan, P., ‘An Analysis of Related-Party Transactions in India’ (2013), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2352791.Google Scholar

State Street Global Advisors, Proxy Voting and Engagement Principles (2014).Google Scholar

Stout, L. A. ‘The Corporation as Time Machine: Intergenerational Equity, Intergenerational Efficiency, and the Corporate Form’ (2015) 38 Seattle University Law Review 685.Google Scholar

Stout, L. A., ‘Bad and Not-So-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy’ (2002) 75 Southern California Law Review 1189.Google Scholar

Stout, L. A., ‘How Efficient Markets Undervalue Stocks: CAPM and ECMH Under Conditions of Uncertainty and Disagreement’ (1997) 19 Cardozo Law Review 475.Google Scholar

Stout, L. A., ‘The Corporation and the Question of Time’ in Choudhury, B. and Petrin, M. (eds.), Understanding the Company: Corporate Governance and Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Stout, L. A., ‘The Mechanics of Market Inefficiency: An Introduction to the New Finance’ (2003) 28 Journal of Corporation Law 635.Google Scholar

Stout, L. A., ‘The Mythical Benefits of Shareholder Control’ (2007) 93 Virginia Law Review 789.Google Scholar

Stout, L. A., ‘The Toxic Side Effects of Shareholder Primacy’ (2013) 161 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2003.Google Scholar

Stout, L. A., The Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations and the Public (Berrett-Keohler, 2012).Google Scholar

StrineJr., L. E., ‘Can We Do Better by Ordinary Investors? A Pragmatic Reaction to the Dueling Ideological Mythologists of Corporate Law’ (2014) 114 Columbia Law Review 449.Google Scholar

StrineJr., L. E., ‘Corporate Power Is Corporate Purpose I: Evidence from My Hometown’ (2017) 2 Oxford Review of Economic Policy 176.Google Scholar

StrineJr., L. E., ‘Corporate Power is Corporate Purpose II: An Encouragement for Future Consideration from Professors Johnson and Million’ (2017) 74 Washington & Lee Law Review 1165.Google Scholar

StrineJr., L. E., ‘One Fundamental Corporate Governance Question We Face: Can Corporations Be Managed for the Long Term Unless Their Powerful Electorates Also Act and Think Long Term?’ (2010) 66 Business Lawyer 1.Google Scholar

Subramanian, S., ‘A Comparison of Corporate Governance Practices in State-owned Enterprises and Their Private Sector Peers in India’ (2016) 5 IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review 200.Google Scholar

Subramanian, S., ‘Proxy Advisory Industry in India’ (2016) 13 Corporate Ownership and Control 371.Google Scholar

Subramanian, S., ‘Proxy Advisory Voting Recommendations in India – An Exploratory Study’ (2017) 9 Journal of Indian Business Research 283.Google Scholar

Swadling, W., ‘Property: General Principles’ in Burrows, A. (eds.), English Private Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2007).Google Scholar

Tam, O. K. and Tan, G. S., ‘Ownership, Governance and Firm Performance in Malaysia’ (2007) 15 Corporate Governance: An International Review 208.Google Scholar

Tan, C. H., Puchniak, D. W. and Varottil, U., ‘State-Owned Enterprises in Singapore: Historical Insights into a Potential Model for Reform’ (2015) 28 Columbia Journal of Asian Law 61.Google Scholar

Tan, K. Y. L., ‘The Singapore Judiciary: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity’ in Lee, H. P. and Pittard, M. (eds.), Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Tan, L. H., ‘Exploring the Question of the Separation of Ownership from Control: An Empirical Study of the Structure of Corporate Ownership in Singapore’s Top 100 Listed Companies’ (2010), available at http://docs.business.auckland.ac.nz/Doc/exploring-the-question-of-ownership-from-control.pdf.Google Scholar

Tan, L. H., ‘Family-Owned Firms in Singapore: Legal Strategies for Constraining Self-Dealing in Concentrated Ownership Structures’ (2011) 23 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 890.Google Scholar

Tan, L. H., Tan, C. H. and Long, H. C., Corporate Governance of Listed Companies in Singapore (Sweet & Maxwell, 2nd ed., 2013).Google Scholar

Tata Consultancy Services Limited Corporate Sustainability Report (2016).Google Scholar

Tergesen, A. and Zweig, J., ‘The Dying Business of Picking Stocks’, Wall Street Journal, 17 October 2016.Google Scholar

Thaler, R., ‘Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice’ (1980) 1 Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 39.Google Scholar

The Companies (Meetings of Board and Its Powers) Second Amendment Rules, 2014. General Circular No. 41/2014, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India (2014).Google Scholar

The Malaysian Corporate Law Reform Committee for the Companies Commission, A Consultative Document on Clarifying and Reformulating on Clarifying and Reformulating the Directors the Directors’ Role and Duties (2006).Google Scholar

The Parliamentary Debates (Authorised Edition), Fourth Series, First Session of the Twenty-Eighth Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Volume 152 (1906).Google Scholar

The Purposeful Company: Interim Report (May 2016).Google Scholar

Thillanathan, R., ‘Corporate Governance & Restructuring in Malaysia – A Review of Markets, Mechanisms, Agents & The Legal Infrastructure’ (1999), available at www.oecd.org/corporate/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/1931380.pdf.Google Scholar

Thomas, G., Thomas on Powers (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed., 2012).Google Scholar

Thomas, R. S. and Edelman, P. H., ‘The Theory and Practice of Corporate Voting at US Public Companies’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar

Thompson, R. B., ‘The Power of Shareholders in the United States’ in Hill, J. G. and Thomas, R. S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shareholder Power (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar

Tirole, J., ‘Cognition and Incomplete Contracts’ (2009) 99 American Economic Review 265.Google Scholar

Tjio, H., Koh, P. and Lee, P. W., Corporate Law (Academy Publishing 2015).Google Scholar

Tonello, M., ‘Revisiting Stock Market Short-Termism’ (2006), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=938466.Google Scholar

Torii, T., ‘The New Economic Policy and the United Malays National Organisation, with Special Reference to the Restructuring of the Malaysian Society’ (2007) 35 Developing Economies 209.Google Scholar

Trukhtanov, A., ‘The Irreducible Core of Trust Obligation’ (2007) 123 Law Quarterly Review 342.Google Scholar

Twenty-First Report, Standing Committee on Finance (2009–2010) (Fifteenth Lok Sabha), The Companies Bill, 2009 (2010).Google Scholar

UK Corporate Governance Code (2018).Google Scholar

UK Law Commission Consultation Paper on Fiduciary Duties and Regulatory Rules (Law Commission No 236) (1992).Google Scholar

UK Law Commission Report on Fiduciary Duties of Investment Intermediaries (Law Commission No 350) (2014).Google Scholar

UK Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (Cadbury Report) (1992).Google Scholar

UK Stewardship Code (2012).Google Scholar

Upadhyay, J. P., ‘Govt Moves to Take over Unitech as NCLT Dismisses Company Board’ (2017) LiveMint, (9 Dec) 2017Google Scholar

Vafeas, N., ‘Length of Board Tenure and Outside Director Independence’, (2003) 30 Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 1043.Google Scholar

Varma, J. R., ‘Corporate Governance in India: Disciplining the Dominant Shareholder’ (1997) 9 IIMB Management Review 5.Google Scholar

Varottil, U., ‘The Advent of Shareholder Activism in India’ (2012) 1 Journal on Governance 582.Google Scholar

Varottil, U. and Naujoks, R., ‘Corporate Governance’ in Spedding, L. (ed), India: The Business Opportunity (Eastern Book Company, 2016).Google Scholar

Wahab, E. A. A., How, J. C. Y. and Verhoeven, P., ‘The Impact of the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance: Compliance, Institutional Investors and Stock Performance’ (2007) 3 Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 106.Google Scholar

Walker, D., ‘A Review of Corporate Governance in Banks and Financial Institutions: Final Recommendations’ (2009), available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/walker_review_261109.pdf.Google Scholar

Wan, W. Y., ‘Independent Financial Advisers’ Opinions for Public Takeovers and Related Party Transactions in Singapore’ (2012) 30 Corporate and Securities Law Journal 32.Google Scholar

Wan, W. Y., Chen, C. and Goo, S. H., ‘Public and Private Enforcement of Corporate and Securities Laws: An Empirical Comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore’ (2019) 20 European Business Organization Law Review 319.Google Scholar

Wang, J. and Song, Lin., ‘Timeliness of Annual Reports of Chinese Listed Companies’ (2006) 4 Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 241.Google Scholar

Wasiuzzaman, S. and Lim, K. H., ‘Does Institutional Investors’ Monitoring Substitute for Litigation in Curbing Insider Trading? The Case of Malaysia’ (2017) 43 Managerial Finance 141.Google Scholar

Watchman, P., Anstee-Wedderburn, J. and Shipway, L., ‘Fiduciary Duties in the 21st Century: A UK Perspective’ (2005) 19 Trust Law International 127.Google Scholar

Watson, A., ‘Society’s Choice and Legal Change’ (1980) 9 Hofstra Law Review 1473.Google Scholar

Watson, A., Legal Transplant: An Approach to Comparative Law (University of Georgia Press, 2nd ed., 1993).Google Scholar

Watson, S., ‘Conceptual Confusion: Organs, Agents and Identity in the English Courts’ (2011) 23 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 762.Google Scholar

Watts, P. and Reynolds, F. M. B., Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency (Sweet & Maxwell, 20th ed., 2014).Google Scholar

Watts, P., Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency (Sweet & Maxwell, 21st ed., 2017).Google Scholar

Watts, P., ‘Directors as Agents: Some Aspects of Disputed Territories’ in Busch, D., Macgregor, L. and Watts, P., Agency Law in Commercial Practice (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Watts, W., ‘BlackRock Warns CEOs Against Buybacks That Only Provide Fleeting Gains’, Market Watch, 24 January 2017.Google Scholar

Wee, M. S. and Puchniak, D. W., ‘Derivative Actions in Singapore: Mundanely Non-Asian, Intriguingly Non-American and At the Forefront of the Commonwealth’ in Puchniak, D. W., Baum, H. and Ewing-Chow, M. (eds.), The Derivative Action in Asia: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Wille, K. and Burgos, J., ‘Activists Take Aim at Singapore’s “Buy, Pray, Hope” Model’ Bloomberg, 4 November 2016.Google Scholar

Wille, K., ‘New Singapore Activist Hedge Fund Seeks to Shake Up Companies’ Bloomberg, 4 February 2015.Google Scholar

Williams, M. P. and Taylor, D. W., ‘Corporate Propping Through Related-Party Transactions’ (2013) 55 International Journal of Law and Management 28.Google Scholar

Williamson, O. E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Palgrave Macmillan, 1983).Google Scholar

Witt, M. A. and Redding, G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Asian Business Systems (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Wong, F., ‘Shareholder Engagement and Activism Under the Radar: Empirical Evidence from Hong Kong (2003–15) – Rethinking of Disclosure Interests Regime’ (2017), available at http://papers.ssrm.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2725318.Google Scholar

Wong, S., ‘Why Stewardship is Proving Elusive for Institutional Investors’ (2010) Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law 406.Google Scholar

Woo, J., ‘Keppel O&M Bribery Scandal: Elaborate Scheme Used to Disguise Bribes, Says US Attorney’, Straits Times, 24 December 2017.Google Scholar

Woo, J., ‘Keppel O&M to Pay US$422 m in Fines to Settle Bribery Probe’, Straits Times, 24 December 2017.Google Scholar

World Bank Group Flagship Report, Doing Business 2018: Reforming to Create Jobs (2018).Google Scholar

World Justice Project Rule of Law Index (2017–2018) (2018).Google Scholar

Worthington, S., Robertson, A. and Virgo, G., Revolution and Evolution in Private Law (Hart Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar

Worthington, S., Sealy & Worthington’s Text, Cases & Materials in Company Law (Oxford University Press, 11th ed., 2016).Google Scholar

Wymeersch, E., ‘Shareholders in Action: Towards a New Company Paradigm?’ (2007) 4 European Law Journal 50.Google Scholar

Yatim, P., Kent, P. and Clarkson, P., ‘Governance Structures, Ethnicity, and Audit Fees of Malaysian Listed Firms’ (2006) 21 Managerial Auditing Journal 757.Google Scholar

Yermack, D., ‘Shareholder Voting and Corporate Governance’ (2010) 2 Annual Review of Financial Economics 103.Google Scholar

Yeung, H. W., ‘Limits to the Growth of Family‐Owned Business? The Case of Chinese Transnational Corporations from Hong Kong’ (2000) 13 Family Business Review 55.Google Scholar

Ying, Q. and Wang, L., ‘Propping by Controlling Shareholders, Wealth Transfer and Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies’ (2013) 6 China Journal of Accounting Research 133.Google Scholar

Yiu, E., ‘Why Former Link Boss Put People before Profits’, South China Morning Post, 28 January 2008.Google Scholar

Yoshimori, M., ‘Whose Company Is It? The Concept of Corporations in Japan and the West’ (1995) 28 Long Range Planning 33.Google Scholar

Youdan, T. G., Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts (Carswell, 1989).Google Scholar

Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D. and Jiang, Y., ‘Corporate Governance in Emerging Economies: A Review of the Principal-Principal Perspective’ (2008) 45 Journal of Management Studies 196.Google Scholar

Yvan, A., ‘The Case for and Against Activist Hedge Funds’ (2015), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2613154 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2613154.Google Scholar

Zembrowski, P., ‘Hong Kong Domiciled Funds Growth Outpaces Singapore’, International Advisor, 8 August 2017.Google Scholar

Zollner, W. and Noack, U. (eds.), Kolner Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz (Carl Heymanns, 3rd ed., 2011).Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Access options

References

Book contents

Bibliography

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive