L3/L<span class='italic'>n</span> across Linguistic Domains

Part II - L3/Ln across Linguistic Domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2023

Edited by

Jennifer Cabrelli ,

Adel Chaouch-Orozco ,

Jorge González Alonso ,

Sergio Miguel Pereira Soares ,

Eloi Puig-Mayenco and

Jason Rothman

Show author details

Jennifer Cabrelli: Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Adel Chaouch-Orozco: Affiliation:
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Jorge González Alonso: Affiliation:
Universidad Nebrija, Spain and UiT, Arctic University of Norway
Sergio Miguel Pereira Soares: Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Eloi Puig-Mayenco: Affiliation:
King's College London
Jason Rothman: Affiliation:
UiT, Arctic University of Norway and Universidad Nebrija, Spain

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Third Language Acquisition , pp. 113 - 268

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108957823 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amengual, M. (2021). The Acoustic Realization of Language-Specific Phonological Categories despite Dynamic Cross-Linguistic Influence in Bilingual and Trilingual Speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149, 1271–1284.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Anderson, J. A. E., Mak, L., & Keyvani Chahi, A. (2018). The Language and Social Background Questionnaire: Assessing Degree of Bilingualism in a Diverse Population. Behaviour Research Methods 50, 250–263.CrossRef Google Scholar

Antoniou, M., Liang, E., Ettlinger, M., & Wong, P. (2015). The Bilingual Advantage in Phonetic Learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 683–695.CrossRef Google Scholar

Balas, A. (2018). Non-native Vowel Perception: The Interplay of Categories and Features. Poznan: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar

Balas, A., Kopečková, R., & Wrembel, M. (2019). Perception of Rhotics by Multilingual Children. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 3725–3729). Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The Role of the L2 in L3 Acquisition: The Case of Germanic Syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2012). The L2 Status Factor and the Declarative/Procedural Distinction. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 61–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Barkley, S. (2010). The Acquisition of Orthographic-Phonological Correspondence Rules in L2 and L3 Portuguese: Error Resolution, Interference, and Generalizability. PhD dissertation. University of Florida.Google Scholar

Bartolotti, J., & Marian, V. (2012). Language Learning and Control in Monolinguals and Bilinguals. Cognitive Science, 36(6), 1129–1147.Google Scholar

Benrabah, M. (1991). Learning English Segments with Two Languages. In ICPhS (Ed.), Actes Du XIIème Congrès International Des Sciences Phonétiques (pp. 334–337). Aix-En-Provence: Université De Provence Service Des Publications.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. (1995). A Direct Realist View of Cross-Language Speech Perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research (pp. 171–204). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar

Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Non-native and Second Language Speech Perception: Commonalities and Complementaries. In Munro, M. J. and Bohn, O.-S. (Eds.), Second Language Speech Learning (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Birdsong, D., Gertken, L. M., & Amengual, M. (2012). Bilingual Language Profile: An Easy-to-Use Instrument to Assess Bilingualism. COERLL, University of Texas at Austin. https://sites.la.utexas.edu/bilingual/.Google Scholar

Birner, B. (1995). Pragmatic Constraints on the Verb in English Inversion. Lingua, 97, 233–256.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blank, C., & Zimmer, M. (2009). A transferência fonético-fonológica L2 (francês) – L3 (inglês): um estudo de caso. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 17(1), 207–233.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2012). L3 Phonology: An Understudied Domain. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 33–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2013). The Phonological Permeability Hypothesis: Measuring Regressive L3 Influence to Test L2 Phonological Representations. Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2017). Testing the Phonological Permeability Hypothesis: L3 Phonological Effects on L1 versus L2 Systems. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 698–717.Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J., & Wrembel, M. (2016). Investigating the Acquisition of Phonology in a Third Language: A State of the Science and an Outlook for the Future. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 395–409.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cebrian, J., Mora, J. C., & Aliaga-Garcia, C. (2011). Assessing Crosslinguistic Similarity by Means of Rated Discrimination and Perceptual Assimilation Tasks. In Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., Wrembel, M., & Kul, M. (Eds.), Achievements and Perspectives in the Acquisition of Second Language Speech: New Sounds 2010, vol. 1 (pp. 41–55). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Chang, C. B. (2012). Rapid and Multifaceted Effects of Second-Language Learning on First-Language Speech Production. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 249–268.Google Scholar

De Bot, K. (2012). Rethinking Multilingual Processing: From a Static to a Dynamic Approach. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 79–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

De Bot, K. (2017). Complexity Theory and Dynamic Systems Theory: Same or different? In Ortega, L. & Han, Z.-H. (Eds.), Complexity Theory and Language Development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 51–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Domeno Moreno, C., & Kabak, B. (in press). Monolingual-Bilingual (Non-) Convergence in L3 Rhythm. In Fuchs, R. (Ed.), Speech Rhythm in L1, L2 and Learner Varieties of English (Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Donegan, P. J., & Stampe, D. (2009). Hypotheses of Natural Phonology, Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 45(1), 3–31.Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. (1990). A Theory of Second Language Acquisition within the Framework of Natural Phonology. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., & Wrembel, M. (2017). Natural Growth Model: Explaining Third Language Phonological Acquisition. Paper presented at Societas Linguistica Europaea SLE 2017, Zürich.Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., & Wrembel, M. (2022). Natural Growth Theory of Acquisition (NGTA): Evidence from (Mor)phonotactics. In Sardegna, V. G. & Jarosz, A. (Eds.), Theoretical and Practical Developments in English Speech Assessment, Research, and Training. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Escudero, P. (2009). Linguistic Perception of “Similar” L2 Sounds. In Boersma, P. & Hamann, S. (Eds.), Phonology in Perception (pp. 151–190). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second Language Speech Learning: Theory, Problems, Findings. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research (pp. 233–277). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Wayland, R. (Ed.), Second Language Speech Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement Model of Language Acquisition: Comparing Adults’ and Children’s Patterns of Development in First, Second and Third Language Acquisition of Relative Clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 3–16.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gabriel, C., Thulke, J., & Kupisch, T. (2014). Production and Perception of Non-native Accent in French as a Foreign Language: Multilingual Learners with Mandarin Chinese as a Heritage Language. Paper presented at SLE 2014 Workshop on Advances in the Investigation of L3 Phonological Acquisition.Google Scholar

Gabriel, C., Krause, M., & Dittmers, T. (2018). VOT Production in Multilingual Learners of French as a Foreign Language: Cross-Linguistic Influence from the Heritage Languages Russian and Turkish. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, 1, 59–72.Google Scholar

Gagarina, N., Klop, D., Kunnari, S., et al. (2012). MAIN – Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 56. Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar

Garcia Lecumberri, M. L., & Gallardo Del Puerto, F. (2003). English FL Sounds in School Learners of Different Ages. In Garcia Mayo, M. P. & Garcia Lecumberri, M. L. (Eds.), Age and the Acquisition of English as a Foreign Language (pp. 115–135). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRef Google Scholar

Geiss, M., Gumbsheimer, S., Lloyd-Smith, A., Schmid, S., & Kupisch, T. (2021). Voice Onset Time in Multilingual Speakers: Italian Heritage Speakers in Germany with L3 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(2), 435–459.Google Scholar

Golin, C., Gut, U., Kopečková, R., & Lowie, W. (2019). A Case Study of Adult Multilingual Phonological Development in the Initial Stages of L3 Learning. Presented at New Sounds: The 9th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, Tokyo.Google Scholar

Gut, U. (2010). Cross-Linguistic Influence in L3 Phonological Acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7, 19–38.Google Scholar

Gut, U., Fuchs, R., & Wunder, E-M. (2015). Universal or Diverse Paths to English Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B. (1997). Conditions on Transfer in Phonology. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Second Language Speech: Structure and Process (pp. 161–180) Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B., & Hammarberg, B. (2005). Re-setting the Basis of Articulation in the Acquisition of New Languages: A Third-Language Case Study. In Hufeisen, B. & Fouser, R. (Eds.), Introductory Readings in L3 (pp. 11–18). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar

Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic Awareness in Multilinguals: English as a Third Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Karpf, A. (1990). Selbstorganisationsprozesse in der sprachlichen Ontogenese. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Kopečková, R. (2015). Differences in the Perception of English Vowel Sounds by Child L2 and L3 Learners. In Gut, U., Fuchs, R., & Wunder, E.-M. (Eds.), Universal or Diverse Paths to English Phonology (pp. 71–90). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kopečková, R. (2016). The Bilingual Advantage in L3 Learning: A Developmental Study of Rhotic Sounds. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 410–425.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kopečková, R. (2018). Exploring Metalinguistic Awareness in L3 Phonological Acquisition: The Case of Young Instructed Learners of Spanish in Germany. Language Awareness, 27(1–2), 153–166.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kopečková, R., Marecka, M., Wrembel, M., & Gut, U. (2016). Interactions Between Three Phonological Subsystems of Young Multilinguals: The Influence of Language Status. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 426–443.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kopečková, R., Dimroth, C., & Gut, U. (2019). Children’s and Adults’ Initial Phonological Acquisition of a Foreign Language. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 5(3), 374–401.Google Scholar

Kopečková, R, Wrembel, M., Gut, U., & Balas, A. (2021). Differences in Phonological Awareness of Young L3 Learners: An Accent Mimicry Study. International Journal of Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1897127.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kretzschmar, W. A., Jr. (2015). Language and Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F. (2020). Bilingualism as a Lens to the Mind, the Brain, and Society. Presentation at the Bilingualism Matters Research Symposium, September 22.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bogulski, C. A., & Valdes-Kroff, J. (2012). Juggling Two Languages in One Mind: What Bilinguals Tell Us about Language Processing and Its Consequences for Cognition. In Ross, B. (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 229–262). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. K., & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic Experience and the “Perceptual Magnet Effect.” In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research (pp. 121–154). York Press: Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Lewandowska, H., & Wrembel, M. (2019). The Mutual Influence of Vowel Length Perception in the Second and Third Language. In Calhoun, S, Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 3750–3753). Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar

Liu, Z., Gorba, C., & Cebrian, J. (2019). Effects of Learning an Additional Language on VOT Perception. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar

Llama, R., & López-Morelos, L. P. (2016). VOT Production by Spanish Heritage Speakers in a Trilingual Context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13, 444–458.Google Scholar

Llama, R., Cardoso, W., & Collins, L. (2010). The Influence of Language Distance and Language Status on the Acquisition of L3 Phonology. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 39–57.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Smith, A. (2021). Perceived Foreign Accent in L3 English: The Effects of Heritage Language Use. International Journal of Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1957899.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Smith, A., Gyllstad, H., & Kupisch, T. (2017). Transfer into L3 English: Global Accent in German-Dominant Heritage Speakers of Turkish. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7, 131–162.CrossRef Google Scholar

Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q). Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967.Google Scholar

Missaglia, F. (2010). The Acquisition of L3 English Vowels by Infant German–Italian Bilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 58–74.Google Scholar

Nelson, C. (2020). The Younger, the Better? Speech Perception Development in Adolescent vs. Adult L3 Learners. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting, 6(1), 27–58.Google Scholar

Nelson, C., Gut, U., Kopečková, R., & Lowie, W. (2019). A Case Study of Adult Multilingual Phonological Development in the Initial Stages of L3 Learning. Poster presented at New Sounds: The 9th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, Tokyo.Google Scholar

Nelson, C., Krzysik, I., Lewandowska, H., & Wrembel, M. (2021). Multilingual Learners’ Perceptions of Cross-Linguistic Distances: A Proposal for a Visual Psychotypological Measure. Language Awareness, 30(2), 176–194.Google Scholar

Onishi, H. (2016). The Effect of L2 Experience on L3 Perception. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 459–475.CrossRef Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages, vol. 40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Patience, M. (2018). An Analysis of Global and Local Crosslinguistic Influence in L1 Mandarin–L2 English Learners of L3 Spanish. Estudos Da Língua (Gem), 17(2), 187–208.Google Scholar

Patihis, L., Oh, J. S., & Mogilner, T. (2015). Phoneme Discrimination of an Unrelated Language: Evidence for a Narrow Transfer but Not a Broad-Based Bilingual Advantage. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(1), 3–16.Google Scholar

Pisoni, D. B. (1996). Some Thoughts on “Normalization” in Speech Perception. In Johnson, K. & Mullennix, J. W. (Eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Puig-Mayenco, E., González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2018). A Systematic Review of Transfer Studies in Third Language Acquisition. Second Language Research, 36(1), 31–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ren, X., & Mok, P. (2019). The Acquisition of Korean Prosodic Prominence by Cantonese–English Bilinguals. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2019) Melbourne, Australia. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2011). L3 Syntactic Transfer Selectivity and Typological Determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2013). Linguistic and Cognitive Motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of Third Language (L3) Transfer: Timing of Acquisition and Proficiency Considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2015). Linguistic and Cognitive Motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of Third Language (L3) Transfer: Timing of Acquisition and Proficiency Considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). What Variables Condition Syntactic Transfer? A Look at the L3 Initial State. Second Language Research, 26(2), 219–218.CrossRef Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. (2017). The Scalpel Model of Third Language Acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sorace, A. (2020). L1 Attrition in a Wider Perspective. Second Language Research, 36(2), 203–206.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sypiańska, J. (2013). Quantity and quality of language use and attrition of L1 Polish due to L2 Danish and L3 English. PhD thesis, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.Google Scholar

Sypiańska, J. (2016). Multilingual Acquisition of Vowels in L1 Polish, L2 Danish and L3 English. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(4), 476–495.CrossRef Google Scholar

Westergaard, M. (2019). Microvariation in Multilingual Situations: The Importance of Property-by-Property Acquisition. Second Language Research, 37(3), 379–407.Google Scholar

Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2017). Crosslinguistic Influence in the Acquisition of a Third Language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21, 666–682.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M. (2010). L2-Accented Speech in L3 Production. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7, 75–90.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M. (2011). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition of Voice Onset Time. In Lee, W.-S. & Zee, E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 17-21 August 2011. Hong Kong. CD-ROM. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, 2157–2160.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M. (2012). Foreign Accentedness in Third Language Acquisition. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 281–310). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wrembel, M. (2015a). Metaphonological Awareness in Multilinguals: A Case of L3 Polish, Language Awareness, 24(1), 60–83.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M. (2015b). In Search of a New Perspective: Cross-Linguistic Influence in the Acquisition of Third Language Phonology. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M. (2020). Multilingual Acquisition Property by Property: A View from a Wider Perspective, Second Language Research, 37(3), 441–447.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M. (2021). Transfer vs. Dynamic Cross-Linguistic Interactions: Exploring Alternative Avenues in L3 Research. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 109–115.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M. (2023). Exploring the Acquisition of L3 Phonology: Challenges, New Insights and Future Directions. In Cabrelli, J., Chaouch-Orozco, A., González Alonso, J., et al. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Third Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (Eds.) (2018). Advances in the Investigation of L3 Phonological Acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M., Gut, U., & Mehlhorn, G. (Eds.) (2010). L3 Phonology. Special issue, International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1).Google Scholar

Wrembel, M., Gut, U., Krzysik, I., Lewandowska, H., & Balas, A. (2019a). Acquisition of Rhotics by Multilingual Children. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 954–958). Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M., Marecka, M., & Kopečková, R. (2019b). Extending Perceptual Assimilation Model to L3 Phonological Acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 513–533.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M., Gut, U., Kopečková, R., & Balas, A. (2020). Cross-Linguistic Interactions in Third Language Acquisition: Evidence from Multi-Feature Analysis of Speech Perception. Languages, 5(4), article 52.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M, Gut, U., Kopečková, R., & Balas, A. (2022). The Relationship between the Perception and Production of L2 and L3 Rhotics in Young Multilinguals: An Exploratory Cross-Linguistic Study. International Journal of Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2022.2036158.Google Scholar

Wunder, E-M. (2011). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Multilingual Language Acquisition: Phonology in Third or Additional Language Acquisition. In De Angelis, G., & Dewaele, J.-M. (Eds.), New Trends in Crosslinguistic Influence and Multilingualism Research (pp. 105–128). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

References

Albrechtsen, D. Haastrup, K., & Henriksen, B. (2008). Vocabulary and Writing in a First and Second Language: Process and Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Aronin, L., & Hufeisen, B. (Eds.) (2009). The Exploration of Multilingualism: Development of Research in L3, Multilingualism and Multiple Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2012). The L2 Status Factor and the Declarative/Procedural Distinction. In Amaro, J. Cabrelli, Flynn, S, & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language in Adulthood (pp. 61–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Lindqvist, C. (2007). The Role of Proficiency and Psychotypology in Lexical Cross-Linguistic Influence: A Study of a Multilingual Learner of Italian L3. In Chini, M., Desideri, P., Favilla, M. E., & Pallotti, G. (Eds.), Atti del VI Congresso di Studi dell’Associazione Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, Napoli, 9–10 febbraio 2006 (pp. 123–145). Perugia: Guerra Editore.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., Lindqvist, C., & Laufer, B. (Eds.) (2013). L2 Vocabulary Acquisition, Knowledge and Use: New Perspectives on Assessment and Corpus Analysis. (Eurosla Monograph Series 2). n.p.: Eurosla.Google Scholar

Bartolotti, J., & Marian, V. (2017). Bilinguals’ Existing Languages Benefit Vocabulary Learning in a Third Language. Language Learning, 67(1), 110–140.Google Scholar

Batista, R., & Horst, M.-L. (2016). A New Receptive Vocabulary Size Test for French. La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes/The Canadian Modern Language Review, 2(2), 211–233.Google Scholar

Beglar, D., & Hunt, A. (Eds.) (2005). Vocabulary. Special issue, The Language Teacher, 29(7).Google Scholar

Bogaards, P., & Laufer, B. (Eds.) (2004). Vocabulary in a Second Language: Selection, Acquisition, and Testing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bono, M. (2011). Crosslinguistic Interaction and Metalinguistic Awareness in Third Language Acquisition. In De Angelis, G. & Dewaele, J.-M. (Eds.), New Trends in Crosslinguistic Influence and Multilingualism Research (pp. 25–52). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Bouvy, C. (2000). Towards the Construction of a Theory of Crosslinguistic Transfer. In Cenoz, J. & Jessner, U. (Eds.), English in Europe: The Acquisition of a Third Language (pp. 143–156). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.) (2012). Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Carter, R. (1987). Vocabulary: Applied Linguistic Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. (2001). The Effect of Linguistic Distance, L2 Status and Age on Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition. In Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (Eds.), Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Perspectives (pp. 8–20). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. (2003). The Role of Typology in the Organization of the Multilingual Lexicon. In Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (Eds.), The Multilingual Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (Eds.) (2001). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (Eds.) (2003). The Multilingual Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Chen, J. (2020). How Do L3 Words Find Conceptual Parasitic Hosts in Typologically Distant L1 or L2? Evidence from a Cross-Linguistic Priming Effect. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(10), 1238–1253.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clenton, J., & Booth, P. (2020). First Language Influences on Multilingual Lexicons. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Coady, J., & Huckin, T. (Eds.) (1997). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cobb, T. (2000). One Size Fits All? Francophone Learners and English Vocabulary Tests. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(2), 295–324.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dahlin, H.-L. (2001). On the Role of Lexical Transfer in Third Language Acquisition and Production. MA thesis. Åbo Akademi University.Google Scholar

Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.) (2007). Modelling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

De Angelis, G. (2005). Interlanguage Transfer of Function Words. Language Learning, 55, 379–414.Google Scholar

De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or Additional Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

De Angelis, G., & Selinker, L. (2001). Interlanguage Transfer and Competing Systems in the Multilingual Mind. In Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (Eds.), Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Perspectives (pp. 42–58). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dewaele, J.-M. (1998). Lexical Inventions: French Interlanguage as L2 versus L3. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 471–490.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Wahl, A., Buytenhuijs, F., et al. (2019). Multilink: A Computational Model for Bilingual Word Recognition and Word Translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(4), 657–679.Google Scholar

Ecke, P. (2001). Lexical Retrieval in a Third Language: Evidence from Errors and Tip-of-the-Tongue States. In Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (Eds.), Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Perspectives (pp. 90–114). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Ecke, P. (2015). Parasitic Vocabulary Acquisition, Cross-Linguistic Influence, and Lexical Retrieval in Multilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 145–162.Google Scholar

Ecke, P., & Hall, C. J. (2000). Lexikalische Fehler in Deutsch als Drittsprache: Translexikalischer Einfluss auf drei Ebenen der mentalen Repräsentation. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 37, 31–37Google Scholar

Elgort, I. (2013). Effects of L1 Definitions and Cognate Status of Test Items on the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing, 30(2), 253–272.Google Scholar

Falk, Y. (2015). Lexical Transfer in L3 Learning: A Cross-Sectional Study on Swedish. In Safont Jordá, M. P. & Portolés Falomir, L. (Eds.), Learning and Using Multiple Languages: Current Findings from Research on Multilingualism (pp. 155–173). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.Google Scholar

Falk, Y., & Lindqvist, C. (2019). L1 and L2 Role Assignment in L3 Learning: Is There a Pattern? International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 1–14.Google Scholar

Falk, Y., & Lindqvist, C. (in press). The Proficiency Level Effect in L3 Learning: High-Proficiency L2s Do Not Transfer. Nordic Journal of Language Teaching and LearningGoogle Scholar

González Alonso, J. (2012). Assessing Multilingual Lexical Incorporation Hypotheses Through a Primed Picture-Naming Task. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(1), 91–107.Google Scholar

Hall, C. J. (2002). The Automatic Cognate Form Assumption: Evidence for the Parasitic Model of Vocabulary Development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 40(2), 69–87.Google Scholar

Hall, C. J., & Ecke, P. (2003). Parasitism as a Default Mechanism in L3 Vocabulary Acquisition. In Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (Eds.), The Multilingual Lexicon (pp. 71–85). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Hall, C. J., Newbrand, D., Ecke, P. (2009). Learners’ Implicit Assumptions About Syntactic Frames in New L3 Words: The Role of Cognates, Typological Proximity and L2 Status. Language Learning, 59, 153–202.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B. (2006). Activation de L1 et L2 lors de la production orale en L3: Étude comparative de deux cas. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère (AILE), 24, 45–74.Google Scholar

Hirsh, D. (2012). Current Perspectives in Second Language Vocabulary Research. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Jarvis, S., & Daller, H. (2013). Vocabulary Knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jordan, E. (2012). Cognates in Vocabulary Size Testing: A Distorting Influence? Language Testing in Asia, 2(3), 5–17.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kellerman, E. (1983). Now You See It, Now You Don’t. In Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (Eds.), Language Transfer in Language Learning (pp. 112–134). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Laitakari, K. (2001). Skillnader mellan L1 och L2 vid inlärningen av ett tredje språk: En komparation av finsk och engelsk transfer i inlärarsvenska. Differences Between L1 and L2 in the Acquisition of a Third Language: A Comparison of Finnish and English Transfer in Learner Swedish. MA thesis. Åbo Akademi University.Google Scholar

Laufer, B. (1997). What’s in a Word That Makes It Hard or Easy? Intralexical Factors Affecting the Difficulty of Vocabulary Acquisition. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition, and Pedagogy (pp. 140–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Laufer, B. (Ed.) (2017). Vocabulary. Special issue, Language Teaching Research, 21(1).Google Scholar

Laufer, B., & McLean, S. (2016). Loanwords and Vocabulary Size Test Scores: A Case of Different Estimates for Different L1 Learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 202–217.Google Scholar

Laufer-Dvorkin, B. (1991). Similar Lexical Forms in Interlanguage. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, C. (2009). The Use of the L1 and the L2 in French L3: Examining Cross-Linguistic Lexemes in Multilingual Learners’ Oral Production. International Journal of Multilingualism, 6(3), 281–297.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, C. (2010). Inter- and Intralingual Lexical Influences in Advanced Learners’ French L3 Oral Production. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2–3), 131–157.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, C. (2012). Advanced Learners’ Word Choices in French L3 Oral Production. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 255–280). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, C. (2015). Do Learners Transfer from the Language They Perceive as Most Closely Related to the L3? The Role of Psychotypology for Lexical and Grammatical Cross-Linguistic Influence in French L3. In De Angelis, G., Jessner, U., & Kresic, M. (Eds.), Multilingualism: Crosslinguistic Influence in Language Learning (pp. 231–251). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, C. (2020). First and Second Language Cognate Effects in Third Language Vocabulary Size Estimates. In Booth, P. & Clenton, J. (Eds.), First Language Influences on Multilingual Lexicons (pp. 149–161). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, C., & Bardel, C. (2014). Exploring the Impact of the Proficiency and Typology Factors: Two Cases of Multilingual Learners’ L3 Learning. In Pawlak, M. & Aronin, L. (Eds.), Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism. Studies in Honor of David Singleton (pp. 253–266). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, C., & Falk, Y. (2014). When Germans Begin to Learn Swedish: Which Is the Transfer Source for Function Words, Content Words and Syntax? In Roberts, L., Vedder, I., & Hulstijn, J. (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook, 14 (pp. 225–239). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Lindqvist, C., & Ramnäs, M. (2020). La compétence lexicale en français langue étrangère – quel est l’impact des mots cognats? Synergies Pays Scandinaves, 15, 83–95.Google Scholar

McCarthy, M. J. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Meara, P. (1980) Vocabulary Acquisition: A Neglected Aspect of Language Learning. Language Teaching, 13(3–4), 221–246.Google Scholar

Meara, P. (2009). Connected Words: Word Associations and Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Michiels, B. (1999). Die Rolle der Niederländischkenntnisse bei französischen Lernern von Deutsch als L3. Eine empirische Untersuchung. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 3, 1–111.Google Scholar

Mieszkowska, K., & Otwinowska-Kasztelanic, A. (2015). Is A2 in German Better Than B2 in French When Reading Danish? The Role of Prior Language Knowledge When Faced with an Unknown Language. In De Angelis, G., Jessner, U., &Kresić, M. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Influence and Crosslinguistic Interaction in Multilingual Language Learning (pp. 199–230). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Milton, J. (2009). Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Milton, J. (2013). Measuring the Contribution of Vocabulary Knowledge to Proficiency in the Four Skills. In Bardel, C., Lindqvist, C., & Laufer, B. (Eds.), L2 Vocabulary Acquisition, Knowledge and Use: New Perspectives on Assessment and Corpus Analysis (Eurosla Monograph Series 2; pp. 57–78).Google Scholar

Miralpeix, I. (2020). L1 and L2 Vocabulary Size and Growth. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies (pp. 189–206). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Muñoz, C. (2006). Influence translinguistique et changement de code dans la production orale d’une L4. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 24, 75–99.Google Scholar

Müller-Lancé, J. (2003). Der Wortschatz romanischer Sprachen im Tertiärsprachenerwerb. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.Google Scholar

Möhle, D. (1989). Multilingual Interaction in Foreign Language Production. In Dechert, H. W. & Raupach, M. (Eds.), Interlingual Processes (pp. 179–194). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Nation, I .S. P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. (2020). The Different Aspects of Vocabulary Knowledge. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies (pp. 15–29). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Navés, T., Miralpeix, I., & Luz Celaya, M. (2005). Who Transfers More … and What? Cross-Linguistic Influence in Relation to School Grade and Language Dominance in EFL. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2(2), 113–134.Google Scholar

Otwinowska, A. (2015). Cognate Vocabulary in Language Acquisition and Use: Attitudes, Awareness, Activation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Otwinowska, A., & Szewczyk, J. (2019). The More Similar the Better? Factors in Learning Cognates, False Cognates and Non-cognate Words. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22, 974–991.Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (2004). A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and Procedural Determinants of Second Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Peters, E. (2020). Factors Affecting the Learning of Single-Word Items. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies (pp. 125–142). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the Depths: How Should the Construct of Vocabulary Knowledge Be Defined? In Bogaards, P. & Laufer, B (Eds.), Vocabulary in a Second Language (pp. 209–227). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ringbom, H. (1978). The Influence of the Mother Tongue on the Translation of Lexical Items. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin Utrecht, 3, 80–101.Google Scholar

Ringbom, H. (1987). The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Ringbom, H. (2005). L2-Transfer in Third Language Acquisition. In Hufeisen, B. & Fouser, R. (Eds.), Introductory Readings in L3 (pp. 71–82). Tübingen: Stauffenberg Verlag.Google Scholar

Ringbom, H. (2007). Cross-Linguistic Similarity in Foreign Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Rivers, W. M. (1979). Learning a Sixth Language: An Adult Learner’s Daily Diary. Canadian Modern Language Review, 36, 67–82.Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching Vocabulary: A Vocabulary Research Manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar

Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.) (1997). Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition, and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Singleton, D. (1987). Mother and Other Tongue Influences on Learner French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9(3), 327–345.Google Scholar

Singleton, D. (1999). Exploring the Second Language Mental Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Singleton, D. (2006). How Integrated Is the Integrated Mental Lexicon? In Lengyel, Z. & Navrascics, J (Eds.), Second Language Lexical Processes (pp. 3–16). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Singleton, D., & O’Laoire, M. (2006). Psychotypologie et “facteur L2” dans l’interaction translexicale: Une analyse de l’influence de l’anglais et de l’irlandais sur le français de l’apprenant. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 24, 101–117.Google Scholar

Sjöholm, M. (1979). Partial Dictation as a Testing Device: An Analysis with Special Reference to the Achievement Made by Swedish- and Finnish-Speaking Applicants for English, 1975. In Palmberg, R. (Ed.), Perception and Production of English: Papers on Interlanguage (pp. 123–166). Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar

Smidfelt, L. (2019). Studies on Lexical Inferencing and Inter Comprehension of Italian as a Foreign Language in a Swedish Setting. Doctoral dissertation. University of Lund.Google Scholar

Stedje, A. (1977). Tredjespråksinterferens i fritt tal – en jämförande studie [Third Language Interference in Spontaneous Speech: A Comparative Study]. In Palmberg, R & Ringbom, H (Eds.), Papers from the Conference on Contrasted Linguistics and Error Analysis. Stockholm and Åbo (pp. 141–158). Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar

Treffers-Daller, J., Daller, M. H., & Malvern, D. Et al. (Eds.) (2008). Knowledge and Use of the Lexicon in French as a Second Language. Special issue, Journal of French Language Studies, 18(3).Google Scholar

Tremblay, M. C. (2006). Cross-Linguistic Influence in L3 Acquisition. CLO/OPL. Ottawa, 34, 109–119.Google Scholar

Trévisiol, P. (2006). Influence translinguistique et alternance codique en français L3. Rôles des L1 et L2 dans la production orale d’apprenants japonais. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 24, 13–43.Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T. (2001). The Neural Basis of Lexicon and Grammar in First and Second Language: The Declarative/Procedural Model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(2), 105–122.Google Scholar

Ullman, M. T. (2016). The Declarative/Procedural Model: A Neurobiological Model of Language Learning, Knowledge, and Use. In Hickok, G. & Small, S. L. (Eds.), Neurobiology of Language (pp. 953–968). Cambridge: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Webb, S. (2020). The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language Switches in L3 Production: Implications for a Polyglot Speaking Model. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 295–333.Google Scholar

Woll, N. (2019). Investigating Positive Lexical Transfer from English (L2) to German (L3) by Quebec Francophones. In Vetter, E. & Jessner, U. (Eds.), International Research on Multilingualism: Breaking with the Monolingual Perspective (pp. 103–123). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Yanagisawa, A., & Webb, S. (2020). Measuring Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies (pp. 371–386). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Abutalebi, J., & Green, D. W. (2008). Control Mechanisms in Bilingual Language Production: Neural Evidence from Language Switching Studies. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(4), 557–582.Google Scholar

Acheson, D. J., Ganushchak, L. Y., Christoffels, I. K., & Hagoort, P. (2012). Conflict Monitoring in Speech Production: Physiological Evidence from Bilingual Picture Naming. Brain and Language, 123(2), 131–136.Google Scholar

Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419–439.Google Scholar

Alvarez, R. P., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2003). Accessing Word Meaning in Two Languages: An Event-Related Brain Potential Study of Beginning Bilinguals. Brain and Language, 87(2), 290–304.Google Scholar

Amengual, M. (2012). Interlingual Influence in Bilingual Speech: Cognate Status Effect in a Continuum of Bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 517–530.Google Scholar

Amengual, M. (2021). The Acoustic Realization of Language-Specific Phonological Categories Despite Dynamic Cross-Linguistic Influence in Bilingual and Trilingual Speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149(2), 1271–1284.Google Scholar

Aparicio, X., & Lavaur, J.-M. (2016). Masked Translation Priming Effects in Visual Word Recognition by Trilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(6), 1369–1388.Google Scholar

Bartolotti, J., & Marian, V. (2019). Learning and Processing of Orthography-to-Phonology Mappings in a Third Language. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 377–397.Google Scholar

Beauvillain, C., & Grainger, J. (1987). Accessing Interlexical Homographs: Some Limitations of a Language-Selective Access. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(6), 658–672.Google Scholar

Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2005). Refractory Effects in Picture Naming as Assessed in a Semantic Blocking Paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Section A), 58(4), 667–692.Google Scholar

Bijeljac-Babic, R., Biardeau, A., & Grainger, J. (1997). Masked Orthographic Priming in Bilingual Word Recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25(4), 447–457.Google Scholar

Biloushchenko, I. B. (2017). How Trilinguals Process Cognates and Interlingual Homographs: The Effects of Activation, Decision, and Cognitive Control. Doctoral dissertation. University of Antwerp, Belgium,Google Scholar

Bobb, S. C., Von Holzen, K., Mayor, J., Mani, N., & Carreiras, M. (2020). Co-activation of the L2 During L1 Auditory Processing: An ERP Cross-Modal Priming Study. Brain and Language, 203, article 104739.Google Scholar

Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2010). Is It Time to Leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of Bilingual Language Processing after Fifteen Years of Service? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(03), 359–371.Google Scholar

Brysbaert, M., Van Dyck, G., & Van De Poel, M. (1999). Visual Word Recognition in Bilinguals: Evidence from Masked Phonological Priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 137–148.Google Scholar

Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Brehm, L., Brick, C. A., et al. (2010). Carpet or Cárcel: The Effect of Age of Acquisition and Language Mode on Bilingual Lexical Access. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(5), 669–705.Google Scholar

Chaouch-Orozco, A., González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2021). Individual Differences in Bilingual Word Recognition: The Role of Experiential Factors and Word Frequency in Cross-Language Lexical Priming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(2), 447–474.Google Scholar

Coderre, E. L., Smith, J. F., Van Heuven, W. J. B., & Horwitz, B. (2016). The Functional Overlap of Executive Control and Language Processing in Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 471–488.Google Scholar

Colomé, A. (2001). Lexical Activation in Bilinguals’ Speech Production: Language-Specific or Language-Independent? Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 721–736.Google Scholar

Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Is Lexical Selection in Bilingual Speech Production Language-Specific? Further Evidence from Spanish–English and English–Spanish Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(3), 231–244.Google Scholar

Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical Selection in Bilinguals: Do Words in the Bilingual’s Two Lexicons Compete for Selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41(3), 365–397.Google Scholar

Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2000). The Cognate Facilitation Effect: Implications for Models of Lexical Access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1283–1296.Google Scholar

Costa, A., Colomé, À., Gómez, O., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2003). Another Look at Cross-Language Competition in Bilingual Speech Production: Lexical and Phonological Factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(3), 167–179.Google Scholar

Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Caño, A. (2005). On the Facilitatory Effects of Cognate Words in Bilingual Speech Production. Brain and Language, 94(1), 94–103.Google Scholar

Crinion, J., Turner, R., Grogan, A., Et Al. (2006). Language Control in the Bilingual Brain. Science, 312, 1537–1540.Google Scholar

Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Aamiry, A. (1969). Language and Category Clustering in Bilingual Free Recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(6), 762–768.Google Scholar

de Bot, K. (1992). A Bilingual Production Model: Levelt’s “Speaking” Model Adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

de Bot, K. (2004). The Multilingual Lexicon: Modelling Selection and Control. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 17–32.Google Scholar

de Groot, A. M. B., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (1995). The Development of Bilingual Memory: Evidence from Word Translation by Trilinguals. Language Learning, 45(4), 683–724.Google Scholar

de Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The Processing of Interlexical Homographs in Translation Recognition and Lexical Decision: Support for Nonselective Access to Bilingual Memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (A), 53(2), 397–428.Google Scholar

de Groot, A. M. B., Borgwaldt, S., Bos, M., & Van Den Eijnden, E. (2002). Lexical Decision and Word Naming in Bilinguals: Language Effects and Task Effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 91–124.Google Scholar

Dewaele, J.-M. (1998). Lexical Inventions: French Interlanguage as L2 versus L3. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 471–490.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1998). The BIA Model and Bilingual Word Recognition. In Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (Eds.), Localist Connectionist Approaches to Human Cognition (pp. 189–225). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The Architecture of the Bilingual Word Recognition System: From Identification to Decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 175–197.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Van Heuven, W. J. B., & Grainger, J. (1998a). Simulating Cross-Language Competition with the Bilingual Interactive Activation Model. Psychologica Belgica, 38(3–4), 177–196.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Van Jaarsveld, H., & Ten Brinke, S. (1998b). Interlingual Homograph Recognition: Effects of Task Demands and Language Intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(1), 51–66.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Hilberink-Schulpen, B., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2010a). Repetition and Masked Form Priming within and between Languages Using Word and Nonword Neighbors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 341–357.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Miwa, K., Brummelhuis, B., Sappelli, M., & Baayen, H. (2010b). How Cross-Language Similarity and Task Demands Affect Cognate Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(3), 284–301.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Wahl, A., Buytenhuijs, F., et al. (2019). Modelling Bilingual Lexical Processing: A Research Agenda and Desiderabilia. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(4), 703–713.Google Scholar

Duyck, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Forward and Backward Number Translation Requires Conceptual Mediation in Both Balanced and Unbalanced Bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 889–906.Google Scholar

Duyck, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2008). Semantic Access in Number Word Translation: The Role of Crosslingual Lexical Similarity Experimental Psychology, 55(2), 102–112.Google Scholar

Duyck, W., Diependaele, K., Drieghe, D., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). The Size of the Cross-Lingual Masked Phonological Priming Effect Does Not Depend on Second Language Proficiency. Experimental Psychology, 51(2), 116–124.Google Scholar

European Commission. (2012). Special Eurobarometer 386: Europeans and Their Languages. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/1049.Google Scholar

Eurostat (2019). Foreign Language Skills Statistics. https://ec.eueu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Foreign_language_skills_statistics#Number_of_foreign_languages_known.Google Scholar

Gollan, T. H., Forster, K. I., & Frost, R. (1997). Translation Priming with Different Scripts: Masked Priming with Cognates and Noncognates in Hebrew–English Bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1122–1139.Google Scholar

Goral, M., Levy, E. S., Obler, L. K., & Cohen, E. (2006). Cross-Language Lexical Connections in the Mental Lexicon: Evidence from a Case of Trilingual Aphasia. Brain and Language, 98(2), 235–247.Google Scholar

Grainger, J., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (1998). Masked Priming by Translation Equivalents in Proficient Bilinguals. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(6), 601–623.Google Scholar

Green, D. W. (1998). Mental Control of the Bilingual Lexico-semantic System. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (2001). The Bilingual’s Language Modes. In Nicol, J. (Ed.), One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Haigh, C. A., & Jared, D. (2007). The Activation of Phonological Representations by Bilinguals While Reading Silently: Evidence from Interlingual Homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 623–644.Google Scholar

Hermans, D. (2004). Between-Language Identity Effects in Picture-Word Interference Tasks: A Challenge for Language-Nonspecific or Language-Specific Models of Lexical Access? International Journal of Bilingualism, 8(2), 115–125.Google Scholar

Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., De Bot, K., & Schreuder, R. (1998). Producing Words in a Foreign Language: Can Speakers Prevent Interference from Their First Language? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(3), 213–229.Google Scholar

Hsieh, M.-C., Jeong, H., Sugiura, M., & Kawashima, R. (2021). Neural Evidence of Language Membership Control in Bilingual Word Recognition: An FMRI Study of Cognate Processing in Chinese–Japanese Bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, article 643211.Google Scholar

Jared, D., & Szucs, C. (2002). Phonological Activation in Bilinguals: Evidence from Interlingual Homograph Naming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 225–239.Google Scholar

Keatley, C. W., Spinks, J. A., & De Gelder, B. (1994). Asymmetrical Cross-Language Priming Effects. Memory and Cognition, 22(1), 70–84.Google Scholar

Klaus, J., Lemhöfer, K., & Schriefers, H. (2018). The Second Language Interferes with Picture Naming in the First Language: Evidence for L2 Activation during L1 Production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(7), 867–877.Google Scholar

Klein, D., Milner, B., Zatorre, R. J., Visca, R., & Olivier, A. (2002). Cerebral Organization in a Right-Handed Trilingual Patient with Right-Hemisphere Speech: A Positron Emission Tomography Study. Neurocase, 8(5), 369–375.Google Scholar

Kolers, P. A. (1963). Interlingual Word Associations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2(4), 291–300.Google Scholar

Kolers, P. A. (1966). Reading and Talking Bilingually. American Journal of Psychology, 79(3), 357–376.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., & Ma, F. (2018). The Bilingual Lexicon. In Fernández, E. M. & Smith Cairns, H. (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 294–319). New York: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., Van Hell, J. G., Tokowicz, N., & Green, D. W. (2010). The Revised Hierarchical Model: A Critical Review and Assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(3), 373–381.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kujalowicz, A., & Zajdler, E. (2009). Language Activation and Lexical Processing by Polish Learners of English and Chinese: The Role of Learning Experience in TLA. International Journal of Multilingualism, 6(1), 85–104.Google Scholar

Lauro, J., & Schwartz, A. I. (2017). Bilingual Non-selective Lexical Access in Sentence Contexts: A Meta-analytic Review. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 217–233.Google Scholar

Lemhöfer, K., & Dijkstra, T. (2004). Recognizing Cognates and Interlexical Homographs: Effects of Code Similarity in Language Specific and Generalized Lexical Decision. Memory and Cognition, 32(4), 533–550.Google Scholar

Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., & Michel, M. C. (2004). Three Languages, One ECHO: Cognate Effects in Trilingual Word Recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(5), 585–611.Google Scholar

Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H., et al. (2008). Native Language Influences on Word Recognition in a Second Language: A Mega-Study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 12–31.Google Scholar

Lemhöfer, K., Huestegge, L., & Mulder, K. (2018). Another Cup of TEE? The Processing of Second Language Near-Cognates in First Language Reading. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(8), 968–991.Google Scholar

Lemhöfer, K., Schriefers, H., & Schellenberger, J. (submitted). The Polyglot’s Trouble to Choose: Language Conflict in Trilingual Word Production.Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A Theory of Lexical Access in Speech Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–75.Google Scholar

Li, C., & Gollan, T. H. (2018). Cognates Interfere with Language Selection but Enhance Monitoring in Connected Speech. Memory & Cognition, 46(6), 923–939.Google Scholar

Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual Lexical Access in Context: Evidence from Eye Movements during Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 381–390.Google Scholar

Lijewska, A., & Chmiel, A. (2015). Cognate Facilitation in Sentence Context: Translation Production by Interpreting Trainees and Non-interpreting Trilinguals. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(3), 358–375.Google Scholar

MacNamara, J. (1967). The Linguistic Independence of Bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6(5), 729–736.Google Scholar

Macnamara, J., & Kushnir, S. L. (1971). Linguistic Independence of Bilinguals: The Input Switch. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(5), 480–487.Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An Interactive Activation Model of Context Effects in Letter Perception, p. 1,An Account of Basic Findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407.Google Scholar

Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in Recognizing Pairs of Words: Evidence of a Dependence Between Retrieval Operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90(2), 227–234.Google Scholar

Mickan, A., McQueen, J. M., & Lemhöfer, K. (2020). Between-Language Competition as a Driving Force in Foreign Language Attrition. Cognition, 198, article 104218.Google Scholar

Mulder, K., Van Heuven, W. J. B., & Dijkstra, T. (2018). Revisiting the Neighborhood: How L2 Proficiency and Neighborhood Manipulation Affect Bilingual Processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1860.Google Scholar

Nakayama, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2018). Is There Lexical Competition in the Recognition of L2 Words for Different-Script Bilinguals? An Examination Using Masked Priming with Japanese–English Bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(8), 1168–1185.Google Scholar

Nakayama, M., Verdonschot, R. G., Sears, C. R., & Lupker, S. J. (2014). The Masked Cognate Translation Priming Effect for Different-Script Bilinguals Is Modulated by the Phonological Similarity of Cognate Words: Further Support for the Phonological Account. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(7), 714–724.Google Scholar

Navarrete, E., Del Prato, P., Peressotti, F., & Mahon, B. Z. (2014). Lexical Selection Is Not by Competition: Evidence from the Blocked Naming Paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 253–272.Google Scholar

Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic Priming and Retrieval from Lexical Memory: Roles of Inhibitionless Spreading Activation and Limited-Capacity Attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106(3), 226–254.Google Scholar

Peeters, D., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (2013). The Representation and Processing of Identical Cognates by Late Bilinguals: RT and ERP Effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(4), 315–332.Google Scholar

Poarch, G. J., & Van Hell, J. G. (2013). Cross-Language Activation in Same-Script and Different-Script Trilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(6), 693–716.Google Scholar

Poort, E. D., Warren, J. E., & Rodd, J. M. (2016). Recent Experience with Cognates and Interlingual Homographs in One Language Affects Subsequent Processing in Another Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 206–212.Google Scholar

Potter, M. C., So, K.-F., Von Eckardt, B., & Feldman, L. B. (1984). Lexical and Conceptual Representation in Beginning and Proficient Bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(1), 23–38.Google Scholar

Ringbom, H. (2001). Lexical Transfer in L3 Production. In Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (Eds.), Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition (pp. 59–68). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Roelofs, A., Piai, V., & Garrido Rodriguez, G. (2011). Attentional Inhibition in Bilingual Naming Performance: Evidence from Delta-Plot Analyses. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, article 184.Google Scholar

Santesteban, M., & Schwieter, J. W. (2020). Lexical Selection and Competition in Bilinguals. In Cieślicka, A. B. & Heredia, R. R. (Eds.), Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution (pp. 126–156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schriefers, H., & Lemhöfer, K. (in preparation). Translation Distractor Effects in Trilingual Picture Naming.Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Bilingual Lexical Activation in Sentence Context. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 197–212.Google Scholar

Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V. (1999). Crosstalk between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activation of an Irrelevant Lexicon. Psychological Science, 10(3), 281–284.Google Scholar

Starreveld, P. A., De Groot, A. M. B., Rossmark, B. M. M., & Van Hell, J. G. (2014). Parallel Language Activation during Word Processing in Bilinguals: Evidence from Word Production in Sentence Context. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 258–276.Google Scholar

Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Thierry, G. (2010). Tracking Lexical Access in Speech Production: Electrophysiological Correlates of Word Frequency and Cognate Effects. Cerebral Cortex, 20(4), 912–928.Google Scholar

Szubko-Sitarek, W. (2011). Cognate Facilitation Effects in Trilingual Word Recognition. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 189–208.Google Scholar

Tomoschuk, B., Duyck, W., Hartsuiker, R. J., Ferreira, V. S., & Gollan, T. H. (2021). Language of Instruction Affects Language Interference in the Third Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(4), 707–718.Google Scholar

Tytus, A. E. (2017). Asymmetrical Priming Effects: An Exploration of Trilingual German-English–French Lexico-semantic Memory. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(6), 1625–1644.Google Scholar

Van De Putte, E., De Baene, W., Brass, M., & Duyck, W. (2017). Neural Overlap of L1 and L2 Semantic Representations in Speech: A Decoding Approach. NeuroImage, 162, 106–116.Google Scholar

van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign Language Knowledge Can Influence Native Language Performance in Exclusively Native Contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(4), 780–789.Google Scholar

van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic Neighborhood Effects in Bilingual Word Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 458–483.Google Scholar

van Heuven, W. J. B., Conklin, K., Coderre, E., Guo, T., & Dijkstra, T. (2011). The Influence of Cross-Language Similarity on Within- and Between-Language Stroop Effects in Trilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, article 374.Google Scholar

Vanhove, J., & Berthele, R. (2015). Item-Related Determinants of Cognate Guessing in Multilinguals. In De Angelis, G., Jessner, U., & Kresic, M. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Influence and Crosslinguistic Interaction in Multilingual Language Learning (pp. 95–118). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Vanlangendonck, F., Peeters, D., Rueschemeyer, S.-A., & Dijkstra, T. (2020). Mixing the Stimulus List in Bilingual Lexical Decision Turns Cognate Facilitation Effects into Mirrored Inhibition Effects. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(4), 836–844.Google Scholar

Voga, M., & Grainger, J. (2007). Cognate Status and Cross-script Translation Priming. Memory and Cognition, 35(5), 938–952.Google Scholar

Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical Competition in Non-native Spoken-Word Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Wen, Y., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2018). Limitations of Translation Activation in Masked Priming: Behavioural Evidence from Chinese–English Bilinguals and Computational Modelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 101, 84–96.Google Scholar

Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language Switches in L3 Production: Implications for a Polyglot Speaking Model. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 295–333.Google Scholar

Woutersen, M., De Bot, K., & Weltens, B. (1995). The Bilingual Lexicon: Modality Effects in Processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(4), 289–298.Google Scholar

Yazbek, S., Smayra, T., Mallak, I., et al. (2020). Functional MRI Study of Language Organization in Left-Handed and Right-Handed Trilingual Subjects. Scientific Reports, 10(1), article 13165.Google Scholar

Zhou, H., Chen, B., Yang, M., & Dunlap, S. (2010). Language Nonselective Access to Phonological Representations: Evidence from Chinese–English Bilinguals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(10), 2051–2066.Google Scholar

Zhu, Y., & Mok, P. P. K. (2020). Visual Recognition of Cognates and Interlingual Homographs in Two Non-native Languages: Evidence from Asian Adult Trilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 10(4), 441–470.Google Scholar

References

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of Onset and Nativelikeness in a Second Language: Listener Perception Versus Linguistic Scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306.Google Scholar

Angelovska, T., & Hahn, A. (Eds.) (2017). L3 Syntactic Transfer: Models, New Developments and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The Role of the Second Language in Third Language Acquisition: The Case of Germanic Syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2012). Behind the L2 Status Factor: A Neurolinguistic Framework for L3 Research. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 61–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Sánchez, L. (2017). The L2 Status Factor Hypothesis Revisited: The Role of Metalinguistic Knowledge, Working Memory, Attention and Noticing in Third Language Learning. In Angelovska, T & Hahn, A. (Eds.), L3 Syntactic Transfer: Models, New Developments and Implications (pp. 85–102). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bayona, P. (2009). The Acquisition of Spanish Middle and Impersonal Passive Constructions from SLA and TLA Perspectives. In Leung, Y. I. (Ed.), Third Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar (pp. 1–29). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Berkes, É., & Flynn, S. (2012). Further Evidence in Support of the Cumulative-Enhancement Model. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood (pp. 143–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. (1979). Explicit and Implicit Judgments of L2 Grammaticality. Language Learning, 29(1), 81–103.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. (1982). On the Relationship between Knowing and Using Linguistic Forms. Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 181–206.Google Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What Is the Logical Problem of Foreign Language Learning? In Gass, S. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition (pp. 41–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. (2009). The Evolving Context of the Fundamental Difference Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(2), 175–198.Google Scholar

Borg, K. (2013). The Acquisition of Future of Probability in L3 Spanish. In Cabrelli Amaro, J., Judy, T., & Pascual y Cabo, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA, 2003) (pp. 11–21). Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

Bowles, M. (2011). Meaning Implicit and Explicit Linguistic Knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247–271.Google Scholar

Bruhn De Garavito, J., & Perpiñán, S. (2014). Subject Pronouns and Clitics in the Spanish Interlanguage of French L1 Speakers. In Teddiman, L. (Ed.), Canadian Linguistic Association Conference Proceedings (pp. 1–11). Ottawa: Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar

Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2012). Does First Language Maintenance Hamper Nativelikeness in a Second Language? A Study of Ultimate Attainment in Early Bilinguals. In Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (Eds.), High-Level L2 Acquisition, Learning and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2013a). Raising across Experiencers in L3 Portuguese: Further Evidence for Psychotypological Transfer. In Stavrakaki, S., Konstantinopoulou, P., & Lalioti, M. (Eds.), Advances in Language Acquisition (pp. 272–281). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2013b). The Phonological Permeability Hypothesis: Measuring Regressive L3 Influence to Test L2 Phonological Representations. Doctoral dissertation. University of Florida.Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2017a). The Impact of Portuguese on the Study of Third Language Acquisition. Hispania, 100(5), 55–62.Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2017b). Testing the Phonological Permeability Hypothesis: L3 Phonological Effects on L1 versus L2 Systems. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 698–717.Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J., & Pichan, C. (2021). Initial Phonological Transfer in L3 Brazilian Portuguese and Italian. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(2), 131–167.Google Scholar

Cabrelli Amaro, J., Amaro, F. & Rothman, J. (2015). The Relationship between L3 Transfer and Structural Similarity across Development. In Peukert, H. (Ed.), Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development (pp. 21–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cabrelli, J., & Iverson, M. (2023). Why do Learners Overcome Non-facilitative Transfer Faster from an L2 than an L1? The Cumulative Input Threshold Hypothesis. International Journal of Multilingualism.Google Scholar

Cabrelli, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2020). Theoretical and Methodological Considerations for a Robust Evaluation of the Linguistic Proximity Model. Second Language Research, 37(3), 465–471.Google Scholar

Cabrelli, J., Iverson, M., Giancaspro, D., & Halloran González, B. (2020). Implications of L1 versus L2 Transfer in L3 Rate of Morphosyntactic Acquisition. In Molsing, K., Becker Lopes Perna, C., & Tramunt Ibaños, A. M. (Eds.), Linguistic Approaches to Portuguese as an Additional Language (pp. 11–33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Carvalho, A. M., & Da Silva, J. B. (2006). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: The Case of Spanish–English Bilinguals’ Acquisition of Portuguese. Foreign Language Annals, 39(2), 185–202.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (2001). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistics Perspectives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Child, M. W. (2017). The Typological Primacy Model and Bilingual Types: Transfer Differences between Spanish/English Bilinguals in L3 Portuguese Acquisition. In Bellamy, K., Child, M. W., González, P., Muntendam, A., & Parfita Couto, M. C. (Eds.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone World (pp. 41–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Child, M. W. (2019). Transfer in L3 Cognate Language Acquisition: The Role of Language Background on Instructed L3 Portuguese Acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(2), 143–168.Google Scholar

Clahsen, H. H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical Processing in Language Learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 3–42.Google Scholar

De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or Additional Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

De Angelis, G., & Dewaele, J.-M. (Eds.) (2011). New Trends in Crosslinguistic Influence and Multilingualism Research. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (2000). The Robustness of Critical Period Effects in Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533.Google Scholar

Dussias, P. (2004). Parsing a First Language Like a Second: The Erosion of L1 Parsing Strategies in Spanish–English Bilinguals. International Journal of BIlingualism, 8(3), 355–371.Google Scholar

Dussias, P. E. (2003). Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Learners: Some Effects of Bilinguality on L1 and L2 Processing Strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 529–557.Google Scholar

Efeoglu, G., & Schroeder, C. (2021). Acquisition of Object Pronouns in EFL in Germany by Heritage Speakers of Turkish. Sustainable Multilingualism, 18(1), 71–84.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring Implicit and Explicit Knowledge of a Second Language: A Psychometric Study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 111–139.Google Scholar

Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2011). Object Pronouns in German L3 Syntax: Evidence for the L2 Status Factor. Second Language Research, 27(1), 59–82.Google Scholar

Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2021). Transfer Patterns in L3 Learning Discussed. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 50–53.Google Scholar

Fallah, N., & Jabbari, A. A. (2018). L3 Acquisition of English Attributive Adjectives: Dominant Language of Communication Matters for Syntactic Cross-Linguistic Influence. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8(2), 193–216.Google Scholar

Fallah, N., Jabbari, A., & Fazilatfar, A. (2016). Source(s) of Syntactic CLI: The Case of L3 Acquisition of English Possessives by Mazandarani–Persian Bilinguals. Second Language Research, 32(7), 825–843.Google Scholar

Fernández-Berkes, É., & Flynn, S. (2021). Vindicating the Need for a Principled Theory of Language Acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 30–36.Google Scholar

Fernandez Acosta, D. (2020). The Syntax-Pragmatics Interface: Intransitivity and Word Order in L3 Spanish. PhD thesis. University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar

Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for Language Acquisition: Comparing Adults’ and Children’s Patterns of Development in First, Second and Third Language Acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–16.Google Scholar

García Mayo, M. Del P. (1998). The Null Subject Parameter in Adult Second Language Acquisition. Atlantis, 20(1), 57–58.Google Scholar

Giancaspro, D., Halloran, B., & Iverson, M. (2015). Transfer at the Initial Stages of L3 Brazilian Portuguese: A Look at Three Groups of English/Spanish Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2).Google Scholar

Goad, H., White, L., & Steele, J. (2003). Missing Inflection in L2 Acquisition: Defective Syntax or L1-Constrained Prosodic Representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 48, 243–263.Google Scholar

Godfroid, A., Loewen, S., Jung, S., et al. (2015). Timed and Untimed Grammaticality Judgments Measure Distinct Types of Knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 269–297.Google Scholar

González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2017). Coming of Age in L3 Initial Stages Transfer Models: Deriving Developmental Predictions and Looking towards the Future. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 683–697.Google Scholar

González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2020). Avoiding the Cum hoc ergo propter hoc Fallacy: Comments and Questions Regarding Full Transfer Potential. Second Language Research, 37(3), 423–428.Google Scholar

González Alonso, J., Puig-Mayenco, E., Fábregas, A., Chaouch-Orozco, A., & Rothman, J. (2021). On the Status of Transfer in Adult Third Language Acquisition of Early Bilinguals. PLOS ONE, 16(3), E0247976.Google Scholar

Gorgone, M. (2018). The Acquisition of English as an L3 by Catalan/Spanish Bilinguals. Master’s thesis. Uit, The Arctic University of Norway.Google Scholar

Granena, G., & Long, M. (2013). Sensitive Periods, Language Aptitude, and Ultimate L2 Attainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Grüter, T. (2006). Another Take on the L2 Initial State: Evidence from Comprehension in L2 German. Language Acquisition, 12(4), 287–317.Google Scholar

Hawkins, R., & Casillas, G. (2008). Explaining Frequency of Verb Morphology in Early L2 Speech. Lingua, 118, 595–612.Google Scholar

Heil, J., & Ebert, S. (2018). Extra-syntactic Factors in the That-Trace Effect. In MacDonald, J. E. (Ed.), Contemporary Trends in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Hispanic Linguistic Symposium 2015 (pp. 309–332). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hermas, A. (2010). Language Acquisition as Computational Resetting: Verb Movement in L3 Initial State. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(4), 202–224.Google Scholar

Hermas, A. (2014). Multilingual Transfer: L1 Morphosyntax in L3 English. International Journal of Language Studies, 8(2), 1–24.Google Scholar

Hopp, H. (2019). Cross-Linguistic Influence in the Child Third Language Acquisition of Grammar: Sentence Comprehension and Production among Turkish–German and German Learners of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(2), 567–583.Google Scholar

Ionin, T., & Scutti Santos, H. (2021). Sources of Knowledge in L3 Acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 65–69.Google Scholar

Ionin, T., Grolla, E., Santos, H., & Montrul, S. (2015). Interpretation of NPs in Generic and Existential Contexts in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5, 215–251.Google Scholar

Iverson, M. (2009). N-Drop at the Initial State of L3 Portuguese: Comparing Simultaneous and Additive Bilinguals of English/Spanish. In Pires, A. & Rothman, J. (Eds.), Minimalist Inquiries into Child and Adult Language Acquisition: Case Studies Across Portuguese (pp. 221–244). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Iverson, M. (2010). Informing the Age of Acquisition Debate: L3 as a Litmus Test. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 48(2–3), 221–243.Google Scholar

Jabbari, A. A., Achard-Bayle, G., & Ablali, D. (2018). Acquisition of L3 French Wh-Question Structure by Persian–English Bilinguals. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Jegerski, J., Keating, G., & VanPatten, B. (2016). On-line Relative Clause Attachment Strategy in Heritage Speakers of Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(3), 254–268.Google Scholar

Kopečkov, R., Gut, U., Wrembel, M., & Balas, A. (2022). Phonological Cross-linguistic Influence at the Initial Stages of L3 Acquisition. Second Language Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221123994.Google Scholar

Kupisch, T., Snape, N., & Stangen, I. (2013). Foreign Language Acquisition in Heritage Speakers. In Duarte, J. & Gogolin, I. (Eds.), Linguistic Superdiversity in Urban Areas: Research Approaches (pp. 99–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kupisch, T., Pereira Soares, S. M., Puig-Mayenco, E., & Rothman, J. (2021). Multilingualism and Chomsky’s Generative Grammar. In Allot, N., Lohndal, T., & Rey, G. (Eds.), Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Chomsky. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lago, S. (2021). Some Challenges of Relating Wholesale Transfer Approaches to L3 Linguistic Behavior. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 75–78.Google Scholar

Lakashmanan, U. (1986). The Role of Parametric Variation in Adult Second Language Acquisition: The Case of the Pro-Drop Parameter. Papers in Applied Linguistics – Michigan, 2, 97–118.Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. (2000). Mapping Features to Forms in Second Language Acquisition. In Archibald, J. (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory (pp. 102–129). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. (2009). Some Thoughts on a Contrastive Analysis of Features in Second Language Acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227.Google Scholar

Llisterri, J., & Poch-Olivé, D. (1987). Phonetic Interference in Bilingual’s Learning of a Third Language. In ICPhS (Ed.), Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (vol. 5; pp. 134–147). Tallinn: Institute of Language and Literature, Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S.S.R.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Smith, A., Gyllstad, H., Kupisch, T., & Quaglia, S. (2021). Heritage Language Proficiency Does Not Predict Syntactic CLI into L3 English. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(3), 435–451Google Scholar

Long, M. (2005). Problems with Supposed Counter-Evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesi. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43(4), 287–317.Google Scholar

Montrul, S., Dias, R., & Santos, H. (2009). On Some Null Subject Parameter-Related Properties in the L3 Acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese. Revista Estudos Da Língua(Gem), 7, 163–198.Google Scholar

Montrul, S., Dias, R., & Santos, H. (2011). Clitics and Object Expression in the L3 Acquisition of Brazilian Portuguese. Structural Similarity Matters for Transfer. Second Language Research, 27(1), 21–58.Google Scholar

Mykhaylyk, R., Mitrofanova, N., Rodina, Y., & Westergaard, M. (2015). The Linguistic Proximity Model: The Case of Verb-Second Revisited. In Grillo, E. & Jepson, K. (Eds.), 39th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

Nogueira, L. (2020). Morphosyntactic Transfer in L3 English Beyond the Initial Stages: A Study of 2L1 Speakers of Catalan and Spanish. Master’s thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar

Ortin, R., & Fernandez-Florez, C. (2019). Transfer of Variable Grammars in Third Language Acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 16(4), 442–458.Google Scholar

Parma, A. (2017). Cross-Linguistic Transfer of Object Clitic Structure: A Case of L3 Brazilian Portuguese. Languages, 2(3), article 14.Google Scholar

Pereira Soares, S. M., & Rothman, J. (2021). Cognitive States in Third Language Acquisition and Beyond. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 89–95.Google Scholar

Perpiñán, S. (2017). Catalan–Spanish Bilingualism Continuum: The Expression of Non-personal Catalan Clitics in the Adult Grammar of Early Bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism2, 7(5), 477–513.Google Scholar

Perpiñán, S. (2018). Ongoing Language Change, and Crosslinguistic Influence in Direct Object Expression in Catalan–Spanish Bilingualism. Languages, 3(2), 1–14.Google Scholar

Picoral, A., & Carvalho, A. M. (2020). The Acquisition of Preposition + Article Contractions in L3 Portuguese among Different L1-Speaking Learners: A Variationist Approach. Languages, 5(4), 45.Google Scholar

Puig-Mayenco, E., & Marsden, H. (2018). Polarity-Item Anything in L3 English: Where Does Transfer Come from When the L1 is Catalan and the L2 is Spanish? Second Language Research, 34(4), 487–515.Google Scholar

Puig-Mayenco, E., & Rothman, J. (2020). Low Proficiency Does Not Mean Ab initio: A Methodological Footnote for Linguistic Transfer Studies. Language Acquisition, 27(2), 217–226.Google Scholar

Puig-Mayenco, E., Miller, D., & Rothman, J. (2018a). Language Dominance and Transfer Selection in L3 Acquisition: Evidence from Sentential Negation and Negative Quantifiers in L3 English. In Cho, J., Iverson, M., Judy, T., Leal, T., & Shimanskaya, E. (Eds.), Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition: In Honor of Roumyana Slabakova. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Puig-Mayenco, E., Cunnings, I., Bayram, F., et al. (2018b). Language Dominance Affects Bilingual Performance and Processing Outcomes in Adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01199.Google Scholar

Puig-Mayenco, E., González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2020a). A Systematic Review of Transfer Studies in Third Language Acquisition. Second Language Research, 36(1), 31–64.Google Scholar

Puig-Mayenco, E., Rothman, J., & Tubau, S. (2020b). Language Dominance in the Previously Acquired Languages Modulates Rate of Third Language (L3) Development over Time: A Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(5), 1661–1664.Google Scholar

Prévost, P., & White, L. (1999). Accounting for Morphological Variation in Second Language Acquisition: Truncation or Missing Inflection? In Friedemann, M.-A. & Rizzi, L. (Eds.), The Acquisition of Syntax (pp. 202–235). London: Longman.Google Scholar

Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing Surface Inflection or Impairment in Second Language Acquisition? Evidence from Tense and Agreement. Second Language Research, 16(2), 103–133.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2010). On the Typological Economy of Syntactic Transfer: Word Order and Relative Clause High/Low Attachment Preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 48, 245–273.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2011). L3 Syntactic Transfer Selectivity and Typological Determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). What Variables Condition Syntactic Transfer? A Look at the L3 Initial State. Second Language Research, 26, 189–218.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., & Halloran, B. (2013). Formal Linguistic Approaches to L3/Ln Acquisition: A Focus on Morphosyntactic Transfer in Adult Multilingualism. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 51–67.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., & Iverson, M. (2007). On Parameter Clustering and Resetting the Null-Subject Parameter in L2 Spanish: Implications and Observations. Hispania, 90, 328–341.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2014). A Prolegomenon to the Construct of the Native Speaker: Heritage Speaker Bilinguals Are Natives Too! Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 93–98.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., Cabrelli Amaro, J., & de Bot, K. (2013). Third Language Acquisition. In Herschensohn, J. & Young-Scholten, M. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 372–393). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., González Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Santos, H. (2013). Cross-Linguistic Influence in the Acquisition of Portuguese as a Third Language. PhD dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 Cognitive States and the Full Transfer/Full Access Model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. (2020). The Full Transfer/Full Access Model and L3 Cognitive States. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 1–29.Google Scholar

Siemund, P., & Lechner, S. (2015). Transfer Effects in the Acquisition of English as an Additional Language by Bilingual Children in Germany. In Peukert, Hagen (Ed.), Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development (pp. 147–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Siemund, P., Schröter, S., & Rahbari, S. (2018). Learning English Demonstrative Pronouns on Bilingual Substrate: Evidence from German Heritage Speakers of Russian, Turkish and Vietnamese. In Bonnet, A. & Siemund, P. (Eds.), Language Education in Multilingual Classrooms (pp. 381–405). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. (2017). The Scalpel Model of Third Language Acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–666.Google Scholar

Soto-Corominas, A. (2019). Acquisition of Quantified Partitivity in Catalan–Spanish Bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(6), 873–908.Google Scholar

Tsimpli, I., & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The Interpretability Hypothesis: Evidence from Wh-Interrogatives in Second Language Acquisition. Second Language Research, 23(2), 215–242.Google Scholar

Villegas, Á. (2014). The Role of L2 English Immersion in the Processing of L1 Spanish Sentence Complement/Relative Clause Ambiguities. PhD dissertation. Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar

Westergaard, M. (2020). Microvariation in Multilingual Situations: The Importance of Property-by-Property Acquisition. Second Language Research, 37(3), 379–407.Google Scholar

Westergaard, M. (2021). The Plausibility of Wholesale vs. Property-by-Property Transfer in L3 Acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 103–108.Google Scholar

White, L. (1985). The “Pro-Drop” Parameter in Adult Second Language Acquisition. Language Learning, 35, 47–62.Google Scholar

Wrembel, M. (2021). Transfer vs. Dynamic Cross-Linguistic Interactions. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 109–115.Google Scholar

References

Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. M. (2007). Methodological Considerations in Performing Semantic- and Translation-Priming Experiments Across Languages. Behavior Research Methods, 39(1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Angelovska, T., Roehm, D., & Weinmüller, S. (2020). Uncovering Transfer Effects of Dominance and Proficiency in L3 English Acquisition Using the Visual Moving Window Paradigm and Grammaticality Judgments. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(1), 115–143.Google Scholar

Amaral, L., & Roeper, T. (2014). Multiple Grammars and Second Language Representation. Second Language Research, 30(1), 3–36.Google Scholar

Basnight-Brown, D. M., & Altarriba, J. (2007). Differences in Semantic and Translation Priming across Languages: The Role of Language Direction and Language Dominance. Memory & Cognition, 35(5), 953–965.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The Role of the Second Language in Third Language Acquisition: The Case of Germanic Syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484.Google Scholar

Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2012). Procedural Distinction. Third Language Acquisition in Adulthood, 46, 61.Google Scholar

Ben Abbes, K. (2016). The Acquisition of French Morpho-syntactic Properties: Cross-Linguistic Influence in the Learning of L3 French by Turkish/Spanish Speakers Who Learned English as an L2. PhD dissertation. University of Essex.Google Scholar

Ben Abbes, K. (2020). Transfer in L3 Acquisition: Is It Holistic or Property-Based? International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 7(3), 43–59.Google Scholar

Benati, A., & Schwieter, J. W. (2017). Input Processing and Processing Instruction: Pedagogical and Cognitive Considerations for L3 Acquisition. In Angelovska, T. and Hahn, A. (Eds.), L3 Syntactic Transfer: Models, New Developments, and Implications (pp. 253–275). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bock, K., & Miller, C. (1991). Broken Agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45–93.Google Scholar

Borer, H. (1984). Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar

Bruhn De Garavito, J., & Perpiñán, S. (2014). Subject Pronouns and Clitics in the Spanish Interlanguage of French L1 Speakers. In Teddiman, L. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Ottawa: Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar

Clements, M., & Dóminguez, L. (2018). Testing the Predictions of the Scalpel Model in L3/Ln Acquisition: The Acquisition of Null and Overt Subjects in L3 Chinese. In Cho, J., Iverson, M., Judy, T., Leal, T., & Shimanskaya, E. (Eds.), Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition: In Honor of Roumyana Slabakova (pp. 181–201). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. (1988). Cross-Linguistic Differences in Parsing: Restrictions on the Use of the Late Closure Strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73–105.Google Scholar

Cunnings, I. (2017). Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 659–678.Google Scholar

Dahl, A., Listhaug, K., & Busterud, G. (2022). The Role of L1 Norwegian and L2 English in the Acquisition of Verb Placement in L3 German. In Leal, T., Shimanskaya, E., & Isabelli, C. A. (Eds.), Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism: Features, Interfaces, and Beyond – Selected Proceedings of the 15th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 67; pp. 191–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Del Maschio, N., & Abutalebi, J. (2019). Language Organization in the Bilingual and Multilingual Brain. In Schwieter, J. W. & Paradis, M. (Eds.), The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism (pp. 199–213). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

DeLuca, V., Rothman, J., Bialystok, E., & Pliatsikas, C. (2019). Redefining Bilingualism as a Spectrum of Experiences That Differentially Affects Brain Structure and Function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(15), 7565–7574.Google Scholar

Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language Two. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Ecke, P. (2004). Words on the Tip of the Tongue: A Study of Lexical Retrieval Failures in Spanish–English Bilinguals. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 23(2), 33–63.Google Scholar

Fallah, N., & Jabbari, A. (2018). L3 Acquisition of English Attributive Adjectives: Dominant Language of Communication Matters for Syntactic Cross–Linguistic Influence. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 8, 193–216.Google Scholar

Fallah, N., Jabbari, A., & Fazilatfar, A. M. (2016). Source(s) of Syntactic CLI: The Case of L3 Acquisition of English Possessives by Mazandarani–Persian Bilinguals. Second Language Research, 32(2), 225–245.Google Scholar

Feijoo, R., & García Mayo, M. Del P. (2021). The Acquisition of Relative Clauses by Spanish–Basque Learners of L3 English: Does Dominance Play a Role? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0054.Google Scholar

Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2001). Grammatical Mapping in the Acquisition of a Third Language. In Archer, M. J. and Reder, A. (Eds.), Cuadernos De Linguistica. Madrid: Ortega y Gassett.Google Scholar

Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for Language Acquisition: Comparing Adults’ and Children’s Patterns of Development in First, Second and Third Language Acquisition of Relative Clauses. The International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–16.Google Scholar

González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2021). Avoiding the Cum hoc ergo propter hoc Fallacy: Comments and Questions Regarding Full Transfer Potential. Second Language Research, 37(3), 423–428.Google Scholar

Green, D. W. (1998). Mental Control of the Bilingual Lexico-semantic System. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 1, 67–81.Google Scholar

Green, D. W. (2017). Trajectories to Third-Language Proficiency. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 718–733.Google Scholar

Green, D. W., & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language Control in Bilinguals: The Adaptive Control Hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 515–530.Google Scholar

Grosjean, E. (1998). Studying Bilinguals: Methodological and Conceptual Issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 131–149.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (2001). The Bilingual’s Language Modes. In Nichol, J. (Ed.), One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Guo, Y., & Yuan, B. (2020). L3 Acquisition of Mandarin Sentence-Final Particle Clusters by English–Cantonese Bilinguals. Journal of Second Language Studies, 3(2), 262–291.Google Scholar

Harms, C., & Lakens, D. (2018). Making “Null Effects” Informative: Statistical Techniques and Inferential Frameworks. Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, 3(Suppl 2), 382–393.Google Scholar

Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism: Perspectives of Change in Psycholinguistics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Hernandez, A. E., Claussenius-Kalman, H. L., Ronderos, J., et al. (2019). Neuroemergentism: A Framework for Studying Cognition and the Brain. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 49, 214–223.Google Scholar

Incera, S., & McLennan, C. (2018). The Time Course of Within and Between-Language Interference in Bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22, 88–99.Google Scholar

Jensen, I. N., Mitrofanova, N., Anderssen, M., et al. (2021). Crosslinguistic Influence in L3 Acquisition across Linguistic Modules. International Journal of Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1985127.Google Scholar

Jin, F. (2009). Third Language Acquisition of Norwegian Objects: Interlanguage Transfer or L1 Influence? In Leung, Y. I. (Ed.), Third Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar (pp. 144–161). Bristol: Multilingual MattersGoogle Scholar

Kolb, N., Mitrofanova, N. & Westergaard, M. (2022). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Child L3 English: An Empirical Study on Russian-German Heritage Bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 26(4), 576–501.Google Scholar

Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across Cultures: Applied Linguistic for Language Teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Lago, S., Mosca, M., & Stutter Garcia, A. (2021). The Role of Crosslinguistic Influence in Multilingual Processing: Lexicon versus Syntax. Language Learning, 71(S1), 163–192.Google Scholar

Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving Inferences about Null Effects with Bayes Factors and Equivalence Tests. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 75(1), 45–57.Google Scholar

Lehmann, E. L., & Romano, J. P. (2005). Testing Statistical Hypotheses. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Leung, Y. I. (1998). Transfer between Interlanguages. In Greenhill, A., Hughes, M., Littlefield, H., & Walsh, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 477–487). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Leung, Y. I. (2003). Failed Features versus Full Transfer Full Access in the Acquisition of a Third Language: Evidence from Tense and Agreement. In Liceras, J. M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 199–207). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Leung, Y. I. (2005). L2 vs. L3 Initial State: A Comparative Study of the Acquisition of French DPs by Vietnamese Monolinguals and Cantonese–English Bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 8(1), 39–61.Google Scholar

Libben, G., & Schwieter, J. (2019). Lexical Organization and Reorganization in the Multilingual Mind. In Schwieter, J. and Paradis, M. (Eds.), The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism (pp. 297–312). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Smith, A., Gyllstad, H., Kupisch, T., & Quaglia, S. (2018). Heritage Language Proficiency Does Not Predict Syntactic CLI into L3 English. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(3), 435–451.Google Scholar

Marian, V. & Spivey, M. (2003). Bilingual and Monolingual Processing of Competing Lexical Items. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 173–193.Google Scholar

Odlin, T. (2012). Crosslinguistic Influence in Second Language Acquisition. In Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Puig-Mayenco, E., Miller, D., & Rothman, J. (2018). Language Dominance and Transfer Selection in L3 Acquisition. In Cho, J., Iverson, M., Judy, T., Leal, T., & Shimanskaya, E. (Eds.), Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition. (Studies in Bilingualism 55; pp. 229–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Puig-Mayenco, E., González Alonso, J., & Rothman, J. (2020). A Systematic Review of Transfer Studies in Third Language Acquisition. Second Language Research, 36(1), 31–64.Google Scholar

Quertemont, E. (2011). How to Statistically Show the Absence of an Effect. Psychologica Belgica, 51(2), 109–127.Google Scholar

Reder, L. M., & Kusbit, G. W. (1991). Locus of the Moses Illusion: Imperfect Encoding, Retrieval, or Match? Journal of Memory and Language, 30(4), 385–406.Google Scholar

Roeper, T. (2016). Multiple Grammars and the Logic of Learnability in Second Language Acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00014.Google Scholar

Rothman, J. (2011). L3 Syntactic Transfer Selectivity and Typological Determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). What Variables Condition Syntactic Transfer? A Look at the L3 Initial State. Second Language Research, 26, 189–218.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., González Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 Cognitive States and the Full Transfer/Full Access Model. Second Language Research, 12(1),40-72.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (2021a). The Full Transfer/Full Access Model and L3 Cognitive States. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 1–29.Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (2021b). In Defense of “Copying and Restructuring.” Second Language Research, 37(3), 489–493.Google Scholar

Sharwood Smith, M. (1983). On First Language Loss in the Second Language Acquirer: Problems of Transfer. In Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (Eds.), Language Transfer in Language Learning: Issues in Second Language Research (pp. 222–231). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Sharwood Smith, M. (2019). The Compatibility within a Modular Framework of Emergent and Dynamical Processes in Mind and Brain. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 49, 240–244.Google Scholar

Sharwood Smith, M. (2021). Language Transfer: A Useful or Pernicious Concept? Second Language Research, 37(3), 409–414.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. (2016). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. (2017). The Scalpel Model of Third Language Acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R., & García Mayo, M. Del P. (2015). The L3 Syntax–Discourse Interface. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 208–226.Google Scholar

Stadt, R., Hulk, A., & Sleeman, P. (2016). The Influence of L2 English and Immersion Education on L3 French in the Netherlands. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 33(1), 152–165.Google Scholar

Stadt, R., Hulk, A., & Sleeman, P. (2018a). The Influence of L1 Dutch and L2 English on L3 French: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 2(1), 63–71.Google Scholar

Stadt, R., Hulk, A., & Sleeman, P. (2018b). The Role of L2 Exposure in L3A: A Comparative Study between Third and Fourth Year Secondary School Students in the Netherlands. In Berns, J., Jacobs, H., & Nouveau, D. (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory: Selected Papers from “Going Romance” 29, Nijmegen (vol. 13; pp. 279–296). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Stadt, R., Hulk, A., & Sleeman, P. (2020). L2 Influence in L3 Acquisition: The Role of the L3. In Trotzke, A. & Kupisch, T. (Eds.), Formal Linguistics and Language Education (Educational Linguistics 43; pp. 203–221). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.Google Scholar

Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). First Language Activation during Second Language Lexical Processing: An Investigation of Lexical Form, Meaning, and Grammatical Class. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(3), 387–422.Google Scholar

Thierry, G., & Wu, Y. J. (2007). Brain Potentials Reveal Unconscious Translation during Foreign-Language Comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(30), 12530–12535.Google Scholar

Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (1996). Gradual Development of L2 Phrase Structure. Second Language Research, 12(1), 7–39.Google Scholar

Westergaard, M. (2021a). Microvariation in Multilingual Situations: The Importance of Property-by-Property Acquisition. Second Language Research, 37(3), 379–407.Google Scholar

Westergaard, M. (2021b). L3 Acquisition and Crosslinguistic Influence as Co-activation: Response to Commentaries on the Keynote “Microvariation in Multilingual Situations: The Importance of Property-by-Property Acquisition.” Second Language Research, 37(3), 501–518.Google Scholar

References

Adesope, O. O., Lavin, T., Thompson, T., & Ungerleider, C. (2010). A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Cognitive Correlates of Bilingualism. Review of Educational Research, 80, 207–245.Google Scholar

Alcón-Soler, E. (2012). Teachability and Bilingualism Effects on Third Language Learners’ Pragmatic Knowledge. Intercultural Pragmatics, 9, 511–541.Google Scholar

Alcón-Soler, E., Safont-Jordà, M. P., & Martínez-Flor, A. (2005). Towards a Typology of Modifiers for the Speech Act of Requesting: A Socio-pragmatic Approach. RAEL, Revista Electrónica De Lingüística Aplicada, 4, 1–35.Google Scholar

Antoniou, K. (2019). Multilingual Pragmatics: Implicature Comprehension in Adult L2 Learners and Multilingual Children. In Taguchi, N. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 495–510). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Antoniou, K. (2022). Multilingual and Bi-dialectal Irony Processing. In Culbertson, J, Perfors, A., Rabagliati, H., & Ramenzoni, V. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. eScholarship University of California.Google Scholar

Antoniou, K., & Katsos, N. (2017). The Effect of Childhood Multilingualism and Bilectalism on Implicature Understanding. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 787–833.Google Scholar

Antoniou, K., & Milaki, E. (2021). Irony Comprehension in Bidialectal Speakers. The Modern Language Journal, 105, 697–719.Google Scholar

Antoniou, K., Cummins, C., & Katsos, N. (2016). Why Only Some Adults Reject Under-Informative Utterances. Journal of Pragmatics, 99, 78–95.Google Scholar

Antoniou, K., Veenstra, A., Kissine, M., & Katsos, N. (2020). How Does Childhood Bilingualism and Bi-dialectalism Affect the Interpretation and Processing of Pragmatic Meanings? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 186–203.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. (2017). The Bilingual Adaptation: How Minds Accommodate Experience. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 233–262.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., Green, D. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2009). Bilingual Minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10, 89–129.Google Scholar

Bott, L., & Noveck, I. A. (2004). Some Utterances Are Underinformative: The Onset and Time Course of Scalar Inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 437–457.Google Scholar

Breheny, R. E. (2019). Scalar Implicatures. In Katsos, N. & Cummins, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Pragmatics (pp. 39–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Breheny, R., Katsos, N., & Williams, J. (2006). Are Generalised Scalar Implicatures Generated by Default? An On-line Investigation into the Role of Context in Generating Pragmatic Inferences. Cognition, 100, 434–463.Google Scholar

Breheny, R., Ferguson, H. J., & Katsos, N. (2013). Taking the Epistemic Step: Toward a Model of On‐line Access to Conversational Implicatures. Cognition, 126, 423–440.Google Scholar

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Universals in Language Use: Politeness Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. (2003). The Additive Effect of Bilingualism on Third Language Acquisition: A Review. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7, 71–87.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. (2008). The Acquisition of Pragmatic Competence and Multilingualism in Foreign Language Contexts. In Soler, E. A. & Jordà, M. P. S. (Eds.), Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 123–140). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. (2013). The Influence of Bilingualism on Third Language Acquisition: Focus on Multilingualism. Language Teaching, 46(1), 71–86.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. (2017). Bilingualism and Multilingualism. In Barron, A., Gu, Y., & Steen, G. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 139–150). Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2019). Multilingualism, Translanguaging, and Minority Languages in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 130–135.Google Scholar

Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (2001). Cross-Linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Chiappe, D. L., & Chiappe, P. (2007). The Role of Working Memory in Metaphor Production and Comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 172–188.Google Scholar

Comeau, L., Genesee, F., & Lapaquette, L. (2003). The Modeling Hypothesis and Child Bilingual Codemixing. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7, 113–126.Google Scholar

de Houwer, A., & Ortega, L. (2018). The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de Neys, W., & Schaeken, W. (2007). When People Are More Logical under Cognitive Load: Dual Task Impact on Scalar implicature. Experimental Psychology, 54, 128–133.Google Scholar

Fairchild, S., & Papafragou, A. (2021). The Role of Executive Function and Theory of Mind in Pragmatic Computations. Cognitive Science, 45, e12938.Google Scholar

Fan, S. P., Liberman, Z., Keysar, B., & Kinzler, K. D. (2015). The Exposure Advantage: Early Exposure to a Multilingual Environment Promotes Effective Communication. Psychological Science, 26, 1090–1097.Google Scholar

Filippova, E (2014). Irony Production and Understanding. In Matthews, D. (Ed.), Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition (pp. 261–278). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Genesee, F., & Nicoladis, E. (2007). Bilingual First Language Acquisition. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Language Development (pp. 324–342). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Genesee, F., Nicoladis, E., & Paradis, J. (1995). Language Differentiation in Early Bilingual Development. Journal of Child Language, 22, 611–631.Google Scholar

Genesee, F., Tucker, G. R., & Lambert, W. E. (1975). Communication Skills of Bilingual Children. Child Development, 46(4), 1010–1014.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grey, S., & Tagarelli, K. M. (2018). Psycholinguistic Methods. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsk, L., & Starfield, S. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology (pp. 287–312). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Grodner, D., Klein, N., Carbary, K., & Tanenhaus, M. (2010). “Some,” and Possibly All, Scalar Inferences Are Not Delayed: Evidence for Immediate Pragmatic Enrichment. Cognition, 116(1) 42–55.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F., & Li, P. (2013). The Psycholinguistics of Bilingualism. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Huang, Y., & Snedeker, J. (2009). Online Interpretation of Scalar Quantifiers: Insight into the Semantics‐Pragmatics Interface. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 376–415.Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J. H. (2010). Measuring Second Language Proficiency. In Blom, E. & Unsworth, S. (Eds.), Experimental Methods in Language Acquisition Research (pp. 185–199). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kecskes, I. (2015). How Does Pragmatic Competence Develop in Bilinguals? International Journal of Multilingualism, 12, 419–434.Google Scholar

Koike, D. A., & Palmiere, D. T. (2011). First and Second Language Pragmatics in Third Language Oral and Written Modalities. Foreign Language Annals, 44, 80–104.Google Scholar

Liu, L., & Kager, R. (2017). Perception of Tones by Bilingual Infants Learning Non-tone Languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 561–575.Google Scholar

Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., et al. (1992). Overregularization in Language Acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(4), 1–182.Google Scholar

Marty, P. P., & Chemla, E. (2013). Scalar Implicatures: Working Memory and a Comparison with Only. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 403.Google Scholar

Matthews, D., Biney, H., & Abbot-Smith, K. (2018). Individual Differences in Children’s Pragmatic Ability: A Review of Associations with Formal Language, Social Cognition, and Executive Functions. Language Learning and Development, 14, 186–223.Google Scholar

Montanari, S. (2008). Pragmatic Differentiation in Early Trilingual Development. Journal of Child Language, 36, 597–627.Google Scholar

Politzer‐Ahles, S. (2020). What Can Electrophysiology Tell Us about the Cognitive Processing of Scalar Implicatures? Language and Linguistics Compass, 14, 1–22.Google Scholar

Portolés-Falomir, L. (2015). Multilingualism and Very Young Learners. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Quay, S. (2008). Dinner Conversations with a Trilingual Two-Year-Old: Language Socialization in a Multilingual Context. First Language, 28, 5–33.Google Scholar

Rahimi Domakani, M., Hashemian, M., & Mansoori, S. (2013). Pragmatic Awareness of the Request Speech Act in English as an Additional Language: Monolinguals or Bilinguals? Research in Applied Linguistics, 4, 88–110.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., González Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Safont-Jordà, M. P. (2003). Metapragmatic Awareness and Pragmatic Production of Third Language Learners of English: A Focus on Request Acts Realizations. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 7, 43–69.Google Scholar

Safont-Jordà, M. P. (2005a). Third Language Learners: Pragmatic Production and Awareness, vol. 12. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Safont-Jordà, M. P. (2005b). Pragmatic Production of Third Language Learners of English: A Focus on Request Acts Modifiers. International Journal of Multilingualism, 2, 84–104.Google Scholar

Safont-Jordà, M. P. (2007). Pragmatic Production of Third Language Learners: A Focus on Request External Modification Items. In Safont-Jordà, M. P. & Alcón-Soler, E. (Eds.), Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 167–189). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Safont-Jordà, M. P. (2011). Early Requestive Development in a Consecutive Third Language Learner. International Journal of Multilingualism, 8, 256–276.Google Scholar

Safont-Jordà, M. P. (2012). A Longitudinal Analysis of Catalan, Spanish and English Request Modifiers in Early Third Language Learning. In Gabrys-Barker, D. (Ed.), Cross-Linguistic Influences in Multilingual Language Acquisition (pp. 99–114). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Safont-Jordà, M. P. (2013a). Pragmatic Competence in Multilingual Contexts. In Chappelle, C. (Ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 4510–4516). New York: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Safont-Jordà, M. P. (2013b). Early Stages of Trilingual Pragmatic Development: A Longitudinal Study of Requests in Catalan, Spanish and English. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 68–80.Google Scholar

Safont-Jordà, M. P. (2017). Third Language Acquisition in Multilingual Contexts. In Cenoz, J., Gorter, D. & May, S. (Eds.), Language Awareness and Multilingualism (pp. 137–148). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Safont-Jordà, M. P. & Alcón-Soler, E. (2012). Teachability of Request Act Peripheral Modification Devices in Third Language Learning Contexts. In Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. & Woodfield, H. (Eds.), Interlanguage Request Modification (pp. 275–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Safont-Jordà, M. P., & Portolés-Falomir, L. (2013). Research Methods Effects on Third Language Learners’ Refusals. In Martí, O. & Salazar, P. (Eds.), Refusals in Instructional Contexts and Beyond (pp. 213–235). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Schroeder, S. R. (2018). Do Bilinguals Have an Advantage in Theory of Mind? A Meta-analysis. Frontiers in Communication, 3, article 36.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1976). The Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–24.Google Scholar

Siegal, M., Matsuo, A., Pond, C., & Otsu, Y. (2007). Bilingualism and Cognitive Development: Evidence from Scalar Implicatures. In Otsu, Y. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp. 265–280). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar

Siegal, M., Iozzi, L., & Surian, L. (2009). Bilingualism and Conversational Understanding in Young Children. Cognition, 110, 115–122.Google Scholar

Siegal, M., Tallandini, M.A., Pelizzoni, S., & Michelin, C. (2012). Exploring the Effects of Bilingualism on Children’s Conversational Understanding and Moral Sense. In Siegal, M. & Surian, L. (Eds.), Access to Language and Cognitive Development (pp. 219–240). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Slabakova, R. (2010). Scalar Implicatures in Second Language Acquisition. Lingua, 120, 2444–2462.Google Scholar

Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning Down the Concept of “Interface” in Bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33.Google Scholar

Sorace, A. (2012). Pinning Down the Concept of Interface in Bilingual Development: A Reply to Peer Commentaries. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 209–217.Google Scholar

Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal and External Interfaces in Bilingual Language Development: Beyond Structural Overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 195–210.Google Scholar

Spotorno, N., & Noveck, I.A. (2014). When Is Irony Effortful? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4) 1649–1665.Google Scholar

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind‐Reading. Mind & Language, 17, 3–23.Google Scholar

Stavans, A., & Webman Shafran, R. (2018). The Pragmatics of Requests and Refusals in Multilingual Settings. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15, 149–168.Google Scholar

Syrett, K., Lingwall, A., Perez-Cortes, S., et al. (2017). Differences between Spanish Monolingual and Spanish–English Bilingual Children in Their Calculation of Entailment-Based Scalar Implicatures. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), article 31.Google Scholar

Taguchi, N. (2009). Pragmatic Competence. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Taguchi, N., & Yamaguchi, S. (2019). Comprehension of Implicature in L2 Pragmatics Research. In Taguchi, N. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics (pp. 31–46). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Tiv, M., Rouillard, V., Vingron, N., Wiebe, S., & Titone, D. (2019). Global Second Language Proficiency Predicts Self-Perceptions of General Sarcasm Use among Bilingual Adults. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38, 459–478.Google Scholar

Tiv, M., Deodato, F., Rouillard, V., Wiebe, S., & Titone, D. (2021). Second Language Experience Impacts First Language Irony Comprehension among Bilingual Adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 75, 126.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Tomlinson Jr, J. M., Bailey, T. M., & Bott, L. (2013). Possibly All of That and Then Some: Scalar Implicatures Are Understood in Two Steps. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 18–35.Google Scholar

Trebits, A. (2019). Degree of Multilingualism, Code-Switching and Intensity of Target Language Contact Predict Pragma-linguistic Awareness in an English as a Foreign Language Context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 18(3), 475–490.Google Scholar

Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints, and Apologies. New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Webman Shafran, R. (2019). Level of Directness and the Use of Please in Requests in English by Native Speakers of Arabic and Hebrew. Journal of Pragmatics, 148, 1–11.Google Scholar

Wright, W. E., Boun, S., & García, O. (2017). The Handbook of Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Yow, W. Q., & Markman, E. M. (2011a). Bilingualism and Children’s Use of Paralinguistic Cues to Interpret Emotion in Speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 562–569.Google Scholar

Yow, W. Q., & Markman, E. M. (2011b). Young Bilingual Children’s Heightened Sensitivity to Referential Cues. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12, 12–31.Google Scholar

Zand-Moghadam, A., & Adeh, A. (2020). Investigating Pragmatic Competence, Metapragmatic Awareness and Speech Act Strategies Among Turkmen–Persian Bilingual and Persian Monolingual EFL Learners: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 49, 22–40.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part II - L3/Ln across Linguistic Domains

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive