Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T02:37:24.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

40 - Whither Relationship Science?

The State of the Science and an Agenda for Moving Forward

from Part XI - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2018

By
Harry T. Reis  and
Moran Mizrahi
Edited by
Anita L. Vangelisti  and
Daniel Perlman
Anita L. Vangelisti
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Daniel Perlman
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Get access

Summary

Relationship science has established itself as a multidisciplinary science dedicated to the study of interpersonal relationships. Relationship scientists can take justifiable pride in the knowledge base that has been created, in the varied applications that follow from existing research and theory, and in the infrastructure that can promote future development of the field. At the same time, relationship science is still at a relatively early stage of development; much remains to be done if the field is to achieve the status and impact of a mature, relevant, and interdisciplinary science. In this chapter, we describe the current status of the field, and we discuss seven broad challenges that the field faces. We suggest that forward progress in advancing knowledge and developing effective interventions will depend on our willingness and ability to address these challenges.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships , pp. 553 - 564
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, C. R. (ed.) (2014). Social influences on romantic relationships: Beyond the dyad. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (eds.) (1995). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BBC News (2018). Dating website eHarmony’s “scientific” match ad banned. Retrieved from www.bbc.com/news/technology-42541409, January 11, 2018.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E., (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology (3rd edn., pp. 110–168). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1986). Mea culpas and lamentations: Sir Francis, Sir Isaac, and “The slow progress of soft psychology.” In Gilmour, R. & Duck, S. (eds.) The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 267–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54, 260–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berscheid, E. & Peplau, L. A. (1983). The emerging science of close relationships. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (eds.) Close relationships (pp. 20–67). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. H. (1969). Interpersonal attraction. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, G. E. (2017). The fragile spell of desire: A functional perspective on changes in sexual desire across relationship development. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advanced online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317715350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A. C., Swinth, K. R., Hoyt, C. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, T. N. (2002). Research on relationships as a prelude to action. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 571–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Crano, W. D. (2014). Research design and issues of validity. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. (eds.) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd edn., pp. 11–26). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, N. A., Blake, A. B., & Sherman, R. A. (2017). A snapshot of the life as lived: Wearable cameras in social and personality psychological science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 592–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugental, D. B. (2000). Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: A domain-based approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 187–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (1998). Evolutionary social psychology. In Gilbert, D. & Fiske, S. (eds.) The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol. 2, pp. 982–1026). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 713–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, M. S., & Reis, H. T. (1988). Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 609–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Valentine, B. (2013). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 124–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., & Reis, H. T. (2015). Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 275–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, E. J., Simpson, J. A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 383–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gottman, J., Markman, H., & Notarius, C. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G. (2012). There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartup, W. W., & Stevens, N. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1979). Towards understanding relationships. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1997). Relationships: A dialectical perspective. East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“How viewing cute animals can help rekindle marital spark.” www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/06/170619165420.htmGoogle Scholar
Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 78, 458–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelley, H. H. (1986). Personal relationships: Their nature and significance. In Gilmour, R. & Duck, S. (eds.) The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 3–19). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., … & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Analyzing close relationships. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (eds.) Close relationships (pp. 20–67). New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maniaci, M. R., & Rogge, R. D. (2014). Conducting research on the Internet. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (eds.) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd edn., pp. 443–470). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, J. K., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Beyond positive psychology? Toward a contextual view of psychological processes and well-being. American Psychologist, 67, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, J. K., Olson, M. A., Jones, R. E., & Acosta, L. M. (2017). Automatic associations between one’s partner and one’s affect as the proximal mechanism of change in relationship satisfaction: Evidence from evaluative conditioning. Psychological Science, 28, 1031–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, H. T. (2002). Action matters, but relationship science is basic. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 601–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, H. T. (2007). Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships, 14, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, H. T. (2012). A history of relationship research in social psychology. In Kruglanski, A. W. & Stroebe, W. (eds.) Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 363–382). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Montgomery, L. M., Wilson, P., Wilson, M. R., Bright, I., & Okwumabua, T. (1993). Effects of family and marital psychotherapies: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(6), 992–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terman, L. M., Buttenwieser, P., Ferguson, L. W., Johnson, W. B., & Wilson, D. P. (1938). Psychological factors in marital happiness. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Umberson, D., & Karas Montez, J. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1_suppl), S54–S66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, W. (1938). The family: A dynamic interpretation: New York, NY: Gordon.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. L., Hops, H., & Patterson, G. R. (1973). A framework for conceptualizing marital conflict: A technology for altering it, some data for evaluating it. In Handy, L. D. & Mash, E. L. (eds.), Behavior change: Methodology concepts and practice (pp. 309–342). Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×