Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Diagrams
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene
- Part I Domains of Linguistic Typology
- Part II Typology of Grammatical Categories
- Part III Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
- Index of Authors
- Index of Languages, Language Families and Linguistic Areas
- Index of Subjects
- References
Part III - Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Diagrams
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene
- Part I Domains of Linguistic Typology
- Part II Typology of Grammatical Categories
- Part III Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
- Index of Authors
- Index of Languages, Language Families and Linguistic Areas
- Index of Subjects
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology , pp. 599 - 966Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
Abbi, Anvita. 2012. Dictionary of the Great Andamanese language: English – Great Andamanese – Hindi. Delhi: Ratna Sagar.Google Scholar
Abbi, Anvita. 2013. A grammar of the Great Andamanese language: An ethnolinguistic study. Leiden: Brill Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. and L-Thongkum, Theraphan. 2009. A fuzzy boundary between tone languages and voice-register languages. In Fant, G., Fujisaki, H. and Shen, J. (eds.), Frontiers in phonetics and speech science, pp. 149–55. Bejing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Alexander and Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.. 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alves, Mark J. 2001. What’s so Chinese about Vietnamese? In Thurgood, Graham W. (ed.), Papers from the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, pp. 221–42. Phoenix: Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Alves, Mark J. 2015. Morphological functions among Mon-Khmer languages: Beyond the basics. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 523–49.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto. 1999. Comparative constructions in Sinitic: Areal typology and patterns of grammaticalisation. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto and Matthews, Stephen J.. 2001. Typical creoles and simple languages: The case of Sinitic. Linguistic Typology 5(2/3): 311–24.Google Scholar
Bauer, Robert S. 1996. Identifying the Tai substratum in Cantonese. In Pan-Asiatic linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics, Vol. V, pp. 1806–44. Bangkok: Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 1991. Verb serialization, grammaticalization and attractor positions in Chinese, Hmong, Vietnamese, Thai and Khmer. In Seiler, Hansjakob and Premper, Waldfried (eds.), Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, pp. 509–62. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Blench, Roger. 2011. The role of agriculture in the evolution of mainland Southeast Asian language phyla. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 125–52.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2013a. Southeast Asian islands and Oceania: Austronesian linguistic history. In Bellwood, Peter (ed.), The encyclopedia of global human migration, Vol. I: Prehistory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2013b. The Austronesian languages, revised edn. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bradley, David (ed.). 1995. Studies in Burmese languages. (Pacific Linguistics, A-83). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Bradley, David (ed.). 2007. Language endangerment in China and Mainland Southeast Asia. In Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.), Language diversity endangered, pp. 278–302. (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brunelle, Marc and Kirby, James. 2015. Re-assessing tonal diversity and geographical convergence in Mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 82–110.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas. 2005. A grammar of Jahai. (Pacific Linguistics, 566). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Butler, Becky. 2015. Approaching a phonological understanding of the sesquisyllable with phonetic evidence from Khmer and Bunong. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 443–99.Google Scholar
Capell, Arthur. 1979. Further typological studies in Southeast Asian languages. In Liem, Nguyen Dang (ed.), South-East Asian linguistic studies, Vol. III, pp. 1–42. (Pacific Linguistics, C-45). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary. 2001. Language contact and areal diffusion in Sinitic languages. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, pp. 328–57. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Marybeth. 1989. Hmong and areal South-East Asia. In Bradley, David (ed.), Southeast Asian Syntax, pp. 175–230. (Pacific Linguistics, A-77. Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics No. 11). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Clark, Marybeth and Prasithrathsint, Amara. 1985. Synchronic lexical derivation in Southeast Asian languages. In Ratanakul, Suriya and Premsrirat, Suwilai (eds.), Southeast Asian linguistic studies presented to André-G. Haudricourt, pp. 34–81. Bangkok: Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard (ed.). 1990. The major languages of East and South-East Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard (ed.). 2007. Areal typology of mainland Southeast Asia: What we learn from the WALS maps. In Kullavanijaya, Pranee (ed.), Trends in Thai linguistics, pp. 18–47. (Manusya Special Issue 13). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Cooke, Joseph R. 1968. Pronominal reference in Thai, Burmese and Vietnamese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, James S. 1966. Halang verb phrase. In Thomas, D. D. (ed.), Papers on four Vietnamese languages, pp. 28–34. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2008. An exercise in ‘a posteriori’ language sampling. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61(3): 208–20.Google Scholar
de Sousa, Hilário. 2015. The Far Southern Sinitic languages as part of mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 356–439.Google Scholar
Diffloth, Gérard. 1976. Expressives in Semai. Austroasiatic Studies 1, Oceanic Linguistics, Honolulu, University of Hawaii Special Publication 13: 249–64.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2003. Linguistic epidemiology: Semantics and grammar of language contact in mainland Southeast Asia. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2005. Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2006. Languages as historical documents: The endangered archive in Laos. South East Asia Research 14(3): 471–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2007. A grammar of Lao. (Mouton Grammar Library 38). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (ed.). 2011a. Dynamics of human diversity: The case of mainland Southeast Asia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2011b. Linguistic diversity in mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. 2015. The utility of meaning: What words mean and why. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J and Comrie, Bernard. 2015. Mainland Southeast Asian languages: State of the art and new directions. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J and Comrie, Bernard (eds.). 2015. Languages of mainland Southeast Asia: The state of the art. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J. and Diffloth, Gérard. 2009. Phonology and sketch grammar of Kri, a Vietic language of Laos. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 38(1): 3–69.Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2015. The Mekong-Mamberamo linguistic area. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 266–355.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 2005. The languages of East and Southeast Asia. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinevald, Colette. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Senft, (ed.), pp. 50–92.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary Rosamond. 1969. Sibling terms as used by marriage partners. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 25(3): 228–35.Google Scholar
Hartmann, John. 1998. A linguistic geography and history of Tai Meuang-Fai (Ditch-Dike) techno-culture. Language and Linguistics 16(2): 67–101.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, Davd and Comrie, Bernard (eds.). 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, Eugénie J. A. 1952. The main features of Cambodian pronunciation. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 14: 149–74.Google Scholar
Henderson, Eugénie J. A. 1965. The topography of certain phonetic and morphological characteristics of South East Asian languages. Lingua 15: 400–34.Google Scholar
Henderson, Eugénie J. A. 1967. Grammar and tone in South East Asian languages. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx-Universität Leipzig 16(1/2): 171–8.Google Scholar
Huffman, Franklin E. 1970. Modern spoken Cambodian. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program.Google Scholar
Hyslop, G., Morey, S. and Post, M. W. (eds.). 2011. North East Indian linguistics, Vol. III. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyslop, G., Morey, S. and Post, M. W. (eds.). 2012. North East Indian linguistics, Vol. IV. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyslop, G., Morey, S. and Post, M. W. (eds.). 2013. North East Indian linguistics, Vol. V. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenny, Mathias. 2015. The far west of Southeast Asia: ‘Give’ and ‘get’ in the language of Myanmar. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 155–208.Google Scholar
Jenny, M. and Sidwell, P. (eds.). 2015. The handbook of Austroasiatic languages. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenny, Mathias, Weber, Tobias and Weymuth, Rachel. 2015. The Austroasiatic languages: A typological overview. In Jenny, and Sidwell, (eds.), pp. 13–143. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kölver, Ulrike. 1991. Local prepositions and serial verb constructions in Thai. In Seiler, Hansjakob and Premper, Waldfried (eds.), Partizipation: das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, pp. 485–508. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Kwok, H. 1984. Sentence particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Center of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Long, Yaohong, and Zheng, Guoqiao. The Dong language in Guizhou Province, China. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Luong, H. V. 1988. Discursive practices and power structure: Person-referring forms and sociopolitical struggles in colonial Vietnam. American Ethnologist 15(2): 239–53.Google Scholar
Luong, H. V. 1990. Discursive practices and linguistic meanings: The Vietnamese system of person reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1973. Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Hyman, Larry M. (ed.), Southern California occasional papers in Linguistics, No. 1, pp. 72–95. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1991. Areal and universal dimensions of grammatization in Lahu. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, pp. 383–453. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2001. Genetic versus Contact Relationship: Prosodic diffusability in Southeast Asian Languages. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, pp. 291–327. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen and Yip, Virginia. 1994. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Michaud, Jean (ed.). 2010. Editorial: Zomia and beyond. Special issue of Journal of Global History 5(2): 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morey, S. and Post, M. W. (eds.). 2008. North East Indian linguistics, Vol. I. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar
Morey, S. and Post, M. W. (eds.). 2010. North East Indian linguistics, Vol. II. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2015. Typologizing sesquisyllabicity: The role of structural analysis in the study of linguistic diversity in Mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 500–28.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W. 2011. Prosody and typological drift in Austroasiatic and Tibeto-Burman: Against ‘Indosphere’ and Sinosphere’. In Srichampa, S., Sidwell, P. and Gregerson, K. J. (eds.), Austroasiatic studies: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics (ICAAL4), pp. 198–211. (Mon-Khmer Studies Special Issue 3). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W. 2015. Morphosyntactic reconstruction in an areal-historical context: A pre-historical relationship between North East India and Mainland Southeast Asia? In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 209–65.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 2015. Word-initial prenasalization in Southeast Asia: A historical perspective. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Floyd, Simeon and Norcliffe, Elisabeth. Forthcoming. Egophoricity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schendel, Willem. 2002. Geographies of knowing, geographies of ignorance: Jumping scale in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20(6): 647–68.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 2009. The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Shorto, H. L. 1960. Word and syllable pattern in Palaung. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 23(3), 544–57.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack and Shohet, Merav. 2013. The problem of peers in Vietnamese interaction. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19(3): 618–38.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2013. Southeast Asian Mainland: Linguistic history. In Bellwood, Peter (ed.), The encyclopedia of global human migration, Vol. I: Prehistory, pp. 259–68. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2015. Local drift and areal convergence in the reconstructing of mainland Southeast Asian languages. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 51–81.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul and Blench, Roger. 2011. The Austroasiatic Urheimat: The southeastern riverine hypothesis. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 315–43.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew (ed.). 2007. Language and national identity in Asia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Srichampa, Sophana. 2008. Patterns of polite expressions in Vietnamese. The Mon-Khmer Studies Journal 38: 117–47.Google Scholar
Premsrirat, Suwilai. 1987. Khmu, a minority language of Thailand. (Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics, No. 10). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Premsrirat, Suwilai. 2007. Endangered languages of Thailand. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 186: 75–93.Google Scholar
Premsrirat, Suwilai. 2011. Pearic, a dying branch of Austroasiatic languages and its struggle for survival. In Srichampa, Sophana and Sidwell, Paul (eds.), Austroasiatic studies: Papers from the fourth International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics (ICAAL4), pp.138–153. (Mon-Khmer Studies Journal Special Issue No. 2). Dallas: SIL International; Salaya: Mahidol University; Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Tarling, N. 1993. The Cambridge history of Southeast Asia: From early times to c. 1800, Vol. II. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, David D. 1971. Chrau grammar, Vol. 7. (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 1998. Austronesian and Mon-Khmer Components in the Proto Chamic Vowel System. In Thomas, David (ed.), Further Chamic Studies, pp. 61–90. (Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics, No. 15). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Tufvesson, Sylvia 2011. Analogy-making in the Semai sensory world. The Senses & Society 6(1): 86–95.Google Scholar
Vittrant, Alice. 2015. Expressing motion: The contribution of Southeast Asian languages with reference to East Asian languages. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 579–625.Google Scholar
Vittrant, Alice and Watkins, Justin (eds.). Forthcoming. Mainland South East Asia linguistic area: The languages. Boston and Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Watkins, Justin (ed.). 2005. Studies in Burmese linguistics. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
References
Alpher, Barry. 1994. Yir-Yoront ideophones. In Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound symbolism, pp. 161–77. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Capell, A. 1956. A new approach to Australian linguistics. Sydney: Oceania Publications.Google Scholar
Cleverley, John R. 1968. A preliminary study of the phonology and grammar of Djamindjung. MA thesis, University of New England, Armidale.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 1978. The Middle Clarence dialects of Bandjalang. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan C. 1994. The historical development of pronoun paradigms in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 14: 155–91.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1981. Wargamay. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, Barry J. (eds.), The handbook of Australian languages, Vol II, pp. 1–144. Canberra: Australian National University Press; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2001. The Australian linguistic area. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic relationship: Problems in comparative linguistics, pp. 64–104. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2002. Australian languages: Their nature and development. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2015. Edible gender, mother-in-law style, and other grammatical wonders. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Tamsin. 1980. Ngiyambaa: The language of the Wangaaybuwan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eades, Diana K. 1979. Gumbaynggirr. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, Barry J. (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages, Vol I, pp. 245–361. Canberra: Australian National University Press; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas D. 1995. A grammar of Kayardild, with historical-comparative notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas D. 1996. The syntax and semantics of body part incorporation in Mayali. In Chappell, Hilary and McGregor, William (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part nouns and the part-whole relation, pp. 65–109. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ford, Lysbeth J. 2011. A description of the Emmi language of the Northern Territory of Australia. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Harvey, Mark. 1996. Body parts in Warray. In Chappell, Hilary and McGregor, William (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part nouns and the part-whole relation, pp. 111–53. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1980. Basic materials in Warndarang: Grammar, texts and dictionary. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hercus, Luise A. 1986. Victorian languages: A late survey. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hercus, Luise A. 1994. A grammar of the Arabana-Wangkanguru language, Lake Eyre basin, South Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hudson, Joyce. 1978. The core of Walmatjari grammar. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Lee, Jennifer. 1987. Tiwi today: A study of language change in a contact situation. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Mathews, R. H. 1902. The Murawarri and other Australian languages. Queensland Geographical Journal 18: 52–68.Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca 1983. Ngalakan grammar, texts and vocabulary. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca 1994. A grammar of Wardaman, a language of the Northern Territory of Australia. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Patz, Elisabeth. 1991. Djabugay. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, Barry J. (eds.), The handbook of Australian languages, Vol. IV, pp. 245–347. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Margaret. 1972. Alawa phonology and grammar. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Smythe, W. E. 1978. Bandjalang grammar. Appendix to Crowley, Terry, The Middle Clarence dialects of Bandjalang, pp. 247–478. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Thompson, David A. 1988. Lockhart River ‘Sand Beach’ language: An outline of Kuuku Ya’u and Umpila. Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Australian Aborigines Branch.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1981. The Djaru language of Kimberley, Western Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Walsh, Michael. 1996. Body parts in Murrinh-Patha: Incorporation, grammar and metaphor. In Chappell, Hilary and McGregor, William (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part nouns and the part-whole relation, pp. 327–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
References
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1977. Tarma Quechua: Grammar, texts, dictionary. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1986. La relación quechua-aru. Perspectivas para la separación del léxico. Revista Andina 4(2): 379–426.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1988. Categorías de aspecto en el quechua del Perú central (English text). Amerindia 13: 15–41.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1995. Raíces lingüísticas del quichua de Santiago del Estero. In Garay, Ana Fernández and Barros, José Pedro Viegas (eds.), Actas II Jornadas de Lingüística Aborigen (Buenos Aires, 14–18 November 1994), pp. 25–50. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Instituto de Lingüística.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 2012. Modeling convergence: Towards a reconstruction of the history of Quechuan-Aymaran interaction. LINGUA 122(5): 461–9.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 2013. A Quechuan Mirative? In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Storch, Anne (eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture, pp. 95–109. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Willem F. H. and Muysken, Pieter C.. 2004. The languages of the Andes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander-Bakkerus, Astrid. 2005. Eighteenth-century Cholón. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT).Google Scholar
Beresford-Jones, David and Heggarty, Paul. 2012. Broadening our horizons: Towards an interdisciplinary prehistory of the Andes. In Heggarty, Paul and Beresford-Jones, David (eds.), Archaeology and language in the Andes: A cross-disciplinary exploration of prehistory, pp. 57–84. (Proceedings of the British Academy 173). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bills, Garland D., Troike, Rudolph C., and Vallejo, C. Bernardo. 1969. An introduction to spoken Bolivian Quechua. Special publication of the Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Texas at Austin. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Lucy Th. 1993. El Idioma Aymara: variantes regionales y sociales. La Paz: Ediciones ILCA.Google Scholar
Bruil, Martine. 2008. Innovations in the Ecuadorian Converb Systems: Grammatical change in language contact situations. MPhil. and MA thesis, Faculty of Humanities, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L. 2008. Chavín de Huántar and its sphere of influence. In Silverman, Helaine and Isbell, William (eds.), Handbook of South American archaeology, pp. 681–703. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, Richard L. 2012. Central Andean language expansion and the Chavín sphere of interaction. In Heggarty, Paul and Jones, David Beresford (eds.), Archaeology and language in the Andes: A cross-disciplinary exploration of prehistory, pp. 135–61. (Proceedings of the British Academy 173). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M. 1976. Gramática Quechua Junín-Huanca. Lima: Ministerio de Educación e Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M. 1987. Lingüística Quechua. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos ‘Bartolomé de Las Casas’.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M. 2000. Lingüística Aimara. Lima: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos ‘Bartolomé de Las Casas’.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M. 2006. El Chipaya o la Lengua de los Hombres del Agua. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M. 2008. Quechumara: Estructuras paralelas del quechua y del aimara. La Paz: Universidad Mayor de San Simón, PROEIB Andes, and Plural Editores.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M., Aguirre, Enrique Ballón. 2011. Chipaya: Léxico – Etnotaxonomía. Nijmegen: Center for Language Studies, Radboud University; Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Ciucci, Luca and Muysken, Pieter C.. 2011. Hernando de Alcocer y la Breve declaración del Arte y Bocabulario de lengua del Ynga conforme al estilo y su vso de la provincia de Quito: El más antiguo manuscrito de quichua del Ecuador INDIANA 28: 359–93.Google Scholar
Emlen, Nicholas Q. Forthcoming. Perspectives on the Quechua-Aymara contact relationship and the lexicon and phonology of Pre-Proto-Aymara. International Journal of American Linguistics.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hardman, Martha J. 1966. Jaqaru: Outline of phonological and morphological structure. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hardman, Martha J. 1972. Postulados lingüísticos del idioma aymara. In Escobar, Alberto (ed.), El reto del multilingüismo en el Perú, pp. 37–43. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Hardman, Martha J. 1978. Jaqi: The linguistic family. International Journal of American Linguistics 44(2): 146–53.Google Scholar
Hardman, Martha, Vásquez, Juana and de Dios Yapita, Juan. 1988. Aymara: Compendio de estructura fonológica y gramatical. La Paz: Instituto de Lengua y Cultura Aymara; Gainesville, FL: The Aymara Foundation.Google Scholar
Hastings, Rachel. 2002. The interpretation of Cuzco Quechua relative clauses. In Kim, Ji-Yung and Werle, Adam (eds.), Proceedings of SULA, pp. 53–62. (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 25). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Hintz, Daniel J. 2011. Crossing aspectual frontiers: Emergence, evolution, and interwoven semantic domains in South Conchucos Quechua discourse. (University of California Publications in Linguistics 146). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hintz, Diane M. 2007. Past tense forms and their functions in South Conchucos Quechua: Time, evidentiality, discourse structure, and affect. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Hintz, Daniel J. and Hintz, Diane M.. Forthcoming. The evidential category of mutual knowledge in Quechua. To appear in LINGUA.Google Scholar
Mann, Charles C. 2005. 1491: New revelations of the Americas before Columbus. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Moseley, Michael. 2001. The Incas and their ancestors. Revised edn. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter C. 2012. Modelling the Quechua-Aymara relationship: Structural features, sociolinguistic scenarios and possible archaeological evidence. In Heggarty, Paul and Jones, David Beresford (eds.), Archaeology and language in the Andes: A cross-disciplinary exploration of prehistory, pp. 85–109. (Proceedings of the British Academy 173). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Gary J. 1973. Derivación verbal en el quechua de Ancash. (Documento de Trabajo no. 25). Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Centro de Investigación de Lingüística Aplicada.Google Scholar
Parker, Gary J. 1976. Gramática quechua Ancash-Huailas. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Quesada Castillo, Félix. 1976. Gramática quechua Cajamarca-Cañaris. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Soto Ruiz, Clodoaldo. 1979. Quechua: Manual de Enseñanza. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Torero Fernández de Córdova, Alfredo A. 1964. Los dialectos quechuas. Anales Científicos de la Universidad Agraria 2(4): 446–78. Lima: La Molina.Google Scholar
Torero Fernández de Córdova, Alfredo A. 1972. Lingüística e historia de la sociedad andina. In Escobar, Alberto (ed.), El reto del multilingüismo en el Perú, pp. 46–106. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Torero Fernández de Córdova, Alfredo A. 2002. Idiomas de los Andes: Lingüística e Historia. Lima: Editorial Horizonte.Google Scholar
Vries, Lourens. 2005. Towards a typology of tail-head linkage in Papuan languages. Studies in Language 29(2): 363–84.Google Scholar
Yapita Moya, Juan. 1991. Curso de Aymara Paceño. Institute of Amerindian Studies, University of St Andrews.Google Scholar
References
Baker, M. C. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bergsland, K. 1989. Comparative aspects of Aleut syntax. Aikakauskirja Journal de la Societe Finno-ougrienne 82: 7–80.Google Scholar
Bergsland, K. 1997. Aleut grammar. Alaska Native Language Center, Research paper no. 10, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Boas, F. 1911. Handbook of American Indian languages. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Dorais, L.-J. 1990. Inuit Uqausiqatigiit, Inuit languages and dialects. Iqaluit: Arctic College, Nunatta Campus.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 1991. Switch reference anomalies and ‘topic’ in West Greenlandic: A case of pragmatics over syntax. In Verschueren, J. (ed.), Levels of linguistic Adaptation: Selected papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, August 17–22, 1987, Vol. II, pp. 53–80. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 1992. Morphophonemic complexity and typological stability in a polysynthetic language family. International Journal of American Linguistics 58(2): 242–8.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 1994. The role of typology in the establishment of the genetic relationship between Eskimo and Aleut and beyond. In Miyaoka, O. (ed.), Languages of the North Pacific Rim, Vol. I, pp. 9–36. University of Hokkaido, Sapporo.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 1995. The historical source and typological position of ergativity in Eskimo languages. Etudes/Inuit/Studies 19(2): 61–75.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 2003. Evidentiality in West Greenlandic: A case of scattered coding. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, pp. 291–306. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. 2016. The semantic domain of emotion in Eskimo and neighbouring languages: polysemy, shift, and cognitive motivation. In Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. and Juvanen, P. (eds.), Lexico-typological approaches to semantic shifts and motivation patterns in the lexicon, pp. 285–333. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1960. A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 26: 178–94.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W.. 1836. Uber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaue. Berlin: Koniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Jacobson, S. A. 1995. A practical grammar of the Central Alaskan Yup’ik Eskimo language. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, S. 1851. Grammatik der grönländischen Sprache. Berlin. Reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag Buchhandlung, 1968.Google Scholar
Krauss, M. E. 1976. Eskimo-Aleut. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Native languages of the Americas, pp. 175–281. New York and London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Krauss, M. E. 2007. Native languages of Alaska. In Miyaoka, O., Sakiyama, O. and Krauss, M. E. (eds.), The vanishing languages of the Pacific Rim, pp. 406–17. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leer, J. 1991. Evidence for a northern northwest coast language area: Promiscuous number marking and periphrastic possessive constructions in Hayda, Eyak and Aleut. International Journal of American Linguistics 57(2): 158–93.Google Scholar
Lynge, K. 1978. kalâtdlit oKalugtuait oKalualâvilo. Godthaab: Det groenlandske Forlag.Google Scholar
Mattissen, J. 2003. Dependent-head Synthesis in Nivkh. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mithun, M. 2009. Polysynthesis in the Arctic. In Mahieu, M.-A. and Tersis, N. (eds.), Variations on Polysynthesis, pp. 3–17. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Miyaoka, O. 2012. A grammar of Central Alaskan Yupik (CAY). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62: 56–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Reuse, W. J. 1994. Siberian Yupik Eskimo. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. 1980. Noun incorporation in Greenlandic: A case of syntactic word formation. Language 56(2): 300–19.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1911. The problem of noun incorporation in American languages. American Anthropologist 13: 250–82. Reprinted in The Collected Works of Edward Sapir, ed. Bright, W., Vol. V, pp. 27–59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. 1979. On the origins of ergativity. In Plank, F. (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, pp. 385–404. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Woodbury, A. 2002. The word in Cup’ik. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 79–99. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
References
Alderete, John and Blenkiron, Amber. 2014. Tahltan grammar synopsis. Ms. Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Attla, Catherine. 1983. Sitsiy yugh noholnik ts’in’: As my grandfather told it. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center and Yukon Koyukon School District.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Melissa. 1990. Incorporation in Koyukon Athapaskan. International Journal of American Linguistics 56: 179–95.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Melissa. 1993. The semantics of time: Aspectual categorization in Koyukon Athabaskan. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Melissa. 2000. The semantics of classification in Koyukon Athabaskan. In Fernald, Theodore B. and Platero, Paul R. (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a North American language family. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Déline First Nation. 2005. Bek’éots’erazhá ni̜dė Yahní̜i̜ Só̜bak’ə́ gogho̜ Sahtúot’ine gogodi [If only we had known. The history of Port Radium as told by the Sahtúot’ine]. Déline, Northwest Territories: Déline First Nation.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013a. Prefixing vs. suffixing in inflectional morphology. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/26 [Accessed on 02.04.15].Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013b. Order of subject, object and verb. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/81 [Accessed on 02.04.15].Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013c. Order of relative clause and noun. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/90 [Accessed on 02.04.2015].Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013d. Position of polar question particles. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/92 [Accessed on 02.04.15].Google Scholar
Faltz, Leonard. 2000. A semantic basis for Navajo syntactic typology. In Fernald, Theodore B. and Platero, Paul R. (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a Native American language family, pp. 28–50. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Ellen, Kari, James and Tuttle, Siri. 2006. Lower Tanana Athabaskan language lessons. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Goddard, Pliny Earle. 1905. The Bear River dialect of Athapascan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Golla, Victor. 1970. Hupa grammar. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gunlogson, Christine. 2001. Third person object prefixes in Babine-Witsuwit’en. International Journal of American Linguistics 67: 365–95.Google Scholar
Hajek, John. 2013. Vowel nasalization. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/10 [Accessed on 22.12.14].Google Scholar
Hargus, Sharon. 2002. Negation in Kwadacha (Fort Ware Sekani). Paper presented at the Athabascan Languages Conference, Fairbanks, Alaska.Google Scholar
Hargus, Sharon. 2007. Witsuwit’en grammar: phonetics, phonology, morphology. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Hargus, Sharon. 2010. Vowel quality and duration in Xinag, Yukon Deg. In Tuttle, Siri and Spence, Justin (eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 Dene (Athabaskan) Languages Conference, pp. 33–73. (Alaska Native Language Center Working Papers 2009). Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Holden, Josh. 2013. Bénasní – I remember: Dene Su̜ɬiné oral histories with morphological analysis. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Holton, Gary. 2000. The phonology and morphology of the Tanacross Athabaskan language. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 39–76.Google Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise and Willie, MaryAnn. 1996. ‘Psych’ verbs in Navajo. In Jelinek, Eloise, Midgette, Sally, Rice, Keren and Saxon, Leslie (eds.), Athabaskan language studies: Essays in honor of Robert W. Young, pp. 15–34. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Jetté, Jules and Jones, Eliza. 2000. Koyukon Athabaskan dictionary. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Jung, Dagmar. 2000. Word order in Apache narratives. In Fernald, Theodore B. and Platero, Paul R. (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a Native American language family, pp. 92–100. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kari, James. 1979. Athabaskan verb theme categories: Ahtna. (Alaska Native Language Center Research Papers number 2). Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Kari, James. 1990. Ahtna Athabaskan dictionary. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Kari, James. 2007. Dena’ina topical dictionary. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej. 2005. Inflection vs. derivation and the template for Athabaskan verb morphology. In Gessner, Suzanne (ed.), Proceedings of the 2005 Athabaskan Languages Conference, pp. 67–94. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Krauss, Michael. 1973. Na-Dene. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Linguistics in North America. The Hague: Mouton. 903–78.Google Scholar
Krauss, Michael. 2005. Athabaskan tone. In Hargus, Sharon and Rice, Keren (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, pp. 55–136. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Krauss, Michael and Golla, Victor. 1981. Northern Athapaskan languages. In Helm, June (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. VI: Subarctic, pp. 67–85. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Leer, Jeff. 2000. The negative/irrealis category in Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit. In Fernald, Theodore and Platero, Paul (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a Native American language family, pp. 101–38. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leer, Jeff. 2005. How stress shapes the stem-suffix complex in Athabaskan. In Hargus, Sharon and Rice, Keren (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, pp. 277–318. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fang-Kuei, Li. 1946. Chipewyan. In Hoijer, Harry (ed.), Linguistic structures of native America, pp. 398–423. New York: Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2013a. Consonant inventories. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/1 [Accessed on 22.12.14].Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2013b. Uvular consonants. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/6 [Accessed on 22.12.14].Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2013c. Glottalized Consonants. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/7, Accessed on 2014–12–22.)Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2013d. Lateral consonants. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/8 [Accessed on 22.12.14].Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2013e. Absence of common consonants. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/18 [Accessed on 22.12.14].Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2013f. Presence of uncommon consonants. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/19 [Accessed on 22.12.14].Google Scholar
Manker, Jonathan. 2012. An acoustic study of stem prominence in Hän Athabascan. Masters thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Miller, Julia Colleen. 2013. The phonetics of tone in two dialects of Dane-zaa (Athabaskan). PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Moore, Patrick. 2002. Point of view in Kaska historical narratives. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Perkins, Ellavina. 1978. The role of word order and scope in the interpretation of Navajo sentences. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Perkins, Ellavina. 1982. The extraposition of relative clauses in Navajo. International Journal of American Linguistics 48(3): 277–85.Google Scholar
Platero, Paul. 1974. The Navajo relative clause. International Journal of American Linguistics 40: 365–424.Google Scholar
de Reuse, Willem J. and Goode, Phillip. 2006. A practical grammar of the San Carlos Apache language. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2000. Morpheme order and semantic scope: Word formation in the Athapaskan verb. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2008. On incorporation in Athapaskan languages: Aspects of language change. In Eythórsson, Thórhallur (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory, pp. 375–409. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2011. Principles of affix ordering. An overview. Word Structure 4(2) 169–200.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren and Hargus, Sharon. 2005. Introduction. In Hargus, Sharon and Rice, Keren (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, pp. 1–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren and Saxon, Leslie. 2005. Comparative Athapaskan syntax: Arguments and projections. In Cinque, Guglielmo and Kayne, Richard S. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, pp. 698–774. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rice, Sally. 2009. Athapaskan eating and drinking verbs and constructions. In Newman, J. (ed.), The linguistics of eating and drinking, pp. 109–52. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rushforth, Scott and Tatti, Fibbie. 1980. Bear Lake Athapaskan classificatory verbs: The ‘controlled’–‘uncontrolled’ distinction. Paper presented at the Symposium on Athapaskan Comparative Linguistics and Language Planning, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Saxon, Leslie. 1986. The syntax of pronouns in Dogrib (Athapaskan): Some theoretical consequences. PhD dissertation, University of California San Diego.Google Scholar
Saxon, Leslie. 1989. Lexical versus syntactic projection: The configurationality of Slave. In Cook, Eung-Do and Rice, Keren (eds.), Athapaskan linguistics: Current perspectives on a language family, pp. 379–406. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Saxon, Leslie and Siemens, Mary. 1996. Tɬi̜cho̜ Yatiiì Eni̜tɬ’è [A Dogrib dictionary]. Rae-Edzo, NWT: Dogrib Divisional Board of Education.Google Scholar
Saxon, Leslie and Wilhelm, Andrea. 2016. The “possessed noun suffix” and possession in two Nothern Dene (Athabaskan) languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 82(1): 35–70.Google Scholar
Schauber, Ellen. 1975. The syntax and semantics of questions in Navajo. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 1996. Null objects in functional projections. In Rooryck, Johan and Zaring, Laurie (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, pp. 187–211. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret. 2000. Person and point of view in Navajo direct discourse complements. In Carnie, Andrew, Jelinek, Eloise and Willie, Mary Ann (eds.), Papers in honor of Ken Hale, pp. 19–38. (Working Papers in Endangered and Less Familiar Languages 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret and Yazzie, Evangeline Parsons. 1996. Quantifiers and the position of noun phrases in Navajo. In Jelinek, Eloise, Midgette, Sally, Rice, Keren and Saxon, Leslie (eds.), Athabaskan language studies: Essays in honor of Robert W. Young, pp. 35–80. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Chad. 2000. Iconicity and word order in Koyukon Athabaskan. In Fernald, Theodore B. and Platero, Paul R. (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a Native American language family, pp. 228–51. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuttle, Siri. 2010. Syllabic obstruents in Ahtna Athabaskan. In Wohlgemuth, Jan, Cysouw, Michael and Gensler, Orin (eds.), Rara and rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity, pp. 235–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tuttle, Siri, Lovick, Olga and Núñez-Ortiz, Isabel. 2011. The vowels of Upper Tanana Athabascan. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41: 283–312. Published online. doi:10.1017/S002510031100034X.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1932. The structure of the Athabascan languages. Ms. Whorf Collection, Sterling Library, Yale University.Google Scholar
Willie, MaryAnn. 1989. Why there is nothing missing in Navajo relative clauses. In Cook, Eung-Do and Rice, Keren (eds.), Athapaskan linguistics: Current perspectives on a language family, pp. 360–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Willie, MaryAnn. 1991. Pronouns and obviation in Navajo. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Willie, MaryAnn and Jelinek, Eloise. 2000. Navajo as a discourse configurational language. In Fernald, Theordore B. and Platero, Paul R. (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a Native American language family, pp. 252–87. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Robert W. and Morgan, William Sr. 1987. The Navajo language: A grammar and colloquial dictionary, 2nd edn. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
References
Blankenship, Barbara. 1996. Classificatory verbs in Cherokee. In Munro, Pamela (ed.), Cherokee papers from UCLA, pp. 61–74. (UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 16). Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 2015. A grammar of the Seneca language. (University of California Publications in Linguistics). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cook, William 1979. A grammar of North Carolina Cherokee. PhD dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward. 1996. Laryngeal metathesis and vowel deletion in Cherokee. In Munro, Pamela (ed.),Cherokee papers from UCLA, pp. 23–44. (UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 16). Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary. 1948. Classificatory verbs in Muskogee. International Journal of American Linguistics 14: 242–5.Google Scholar
King, Duane. 1975. A grammar and dictionary of the Cherokee language. PhD dissertation, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Lindsay, Geoffrey and Scancarelli, Janine. 1985. Where have all the adjectives come from? The case of Cherokee. In Niepokuj, Mary, Van Clay, Mary, Nikiforidou, Vassiliki and Feder, Deborah (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 16–18, 1985, pp. 207–15. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1991. Active/Agentive case marking and its motivations. Language 67: 510–46.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1996. Multiple reflections of inalienability in Mohawk. In Chappell, Hilary and McGregor, William (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: Typological perspectives on body part terms and the part-whole relation, pp. 633–49. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2000. Noun and verb in Iroquoian languages: Multicategorisation from multiple criteria. In Vogel, Petra M. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), An anthology of word classes, pp. 379–420. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2001. The difference a category makes in the expression of possession and inalienability. In Herslund, Michael, Sørensen, Finn and Baron, Irène (eds.), Dimensions of possession, pp. 285–310. (Typological Studies in Language 47). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2013. Prosody and independence: Free and bound person marking. In Bakker, Dik and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), Language across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, pp. 291–312. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Montgomery-Anderson, Brad. 2008. A reference grammar of Oklahoma Cherokee. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 1996. The Cherokee laryngeal alternation rule. In Munro, Pamela (ed.), Cherokee papers from UCLA, pp. 45–60. (UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15). Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Reyburn, William. 1952. Cherokee verb morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Scancarelli, Janine. 1987. Grammatical relations and verb agreement in Cherokee. PhD dissertation in linguistics, UCLA.Google Scholar
Uchihara, Hiroto. 2013. Tone and accent in Oklahoma Cherokee. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999. The Arawak language family. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages, pp. 65–106. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The languages of the Amazon. (Oxford Linguistics). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2013. Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Possession and ownership, pp. 1–64. (Explorations in Linguistic Typology). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Ronald J. 1985. Cuentos folklóricos de los Asheninca, Vol. I. (Comunidades y Culturas Peruanas 18). Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Anderson, Ronald J. 1986. Cuentos folklóricos de los Asheninca, Vol. II. (Comunidades y Culturas Peruanas 18). Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Anderson, Ronald J. 2002. Historias de cambio de los ashéninka. (Comunidades y Culturas Peruanas 29). Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Anderson, Ronald J. 2005. Diferencias regionales reconocidas por los ‘campa’. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Lingüísticos 10: 111–22.Google Scholar
Base de Datos de Pueblos Indígenas u Originarios. 2013. Available online at: bdpi.cultura.gob.pe/lista-de-pueblos-indigenas [Accessed 13 December 2014].Google Scholar
Bodley, John H. 2003. The Power of scale: A global history approach. New York and London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2012. Classification of the indigenous languages of South America. In Campbell, Lyle and Grondona, Verónica (eds.), The Indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide, pp. 59–166. (The World of Linguistics 2). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cochachi Vásquez, David, Domingo Prado, Cirílo, Romero, Rosa María Paulino and Cochachi Vásquez, Jhon Edgard (eds.). 2009. Opempe. Oshintsinka noñane. El poder de mi lengua. Satipo: AMABISEC y Andesbooks Editorial.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2007. Content interrogatives in Pichis Asheninka: Corpus study and typological comparison. International Journal of Linguistics 73: 133–63.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1986. Comparative survey of morphology and syntax in Brazilian Arawakan. In Derbyshire, Desmond and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. I, pp. 469–566. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dirks, Sylvester. 1953. Campa (Arawak) phonemes. International Journal of American Linguistics 19(4): 302–4.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory: Further grammatical topics, Vol. III. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. 1999. Introduction. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages, pp. 1–21. (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 2007. Word order. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. I: Clause structure, pp. 61–131. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fabián, Fernández, Clotilde, Liliana. 2011. Conectores discursivos en asháninka. BA thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
Salazar, García, Victoria, Gabriela. 1997. Generalidades de la morfologia y fonologia del ashéninca del Ucayali. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Etnolingüísticos 9: 1–101.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. On S, A, P, T and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Discovery 15(3): 535–67.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. Ditransitive constructions. The Annual Review of Linguistics 1: 19–41.Google Scholar
Heise, María, Payne, David, Payne, Judith and Vilchez, Elsa. 2000. Diccionario escolar ashaninka/asheninka. Lima: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
Heitzman, Allene. 1975. Correspondencias entre ciertos grupos de fonemas en varios dialectos campa. In Lingüística e indigenismo moderno de América: Trabajos presentados al XXXIX Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, Vol. V, pp. 165–79. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Kindberg, Lee D. 1961. Independent and dependent sentence types in Campa (Arawak). In Elson, Benjamin F. and Comas, Juan (eds.), A William Cameron Townsend en el vigésimoquinto aniversario del Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, pp. 519–53. Mexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Kindberg, Lee D. 1980. Diccionario asháninca. (Documento de Trabajo 19). Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Kindberg, Willard. 1961. Campa (Arawak) morphology. In Elson, Benjamin F. and Comas, Juan (eds.), A William Cameron Townsend en el vigésimoquinto aniversario del Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, pp. 519–53. Mexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Aimee. 2012. Reconstruction of Proto-Kampa verbal morphology. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, California, 11–12 February.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Aimee. 2013. Inflectional verbal morphology in Matsiguenga. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev. 2008. Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge and social action in an Amazonian society. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev. 2011. La reconstrucción y la clasificación interna de la rama Kampa de la familia Arawak. Paper presented at the Congreso de Idiomas Indígenas de Latinoamerica V, University of Texas, Austin, October 7.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev. 2012. Possession in Nanti. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 149–66. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev. 2014. The Nanti reality status system: Implications for the typological validity of the realis/irrealis contrast. Linguistic Typology 18(2): 251–88.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev, Chang, Will and Stark, Tammy. 2014. Exploring phonological areality in the circum-Andean region using a Naive Bayes Classifier. Language Dynamics and Change 4(1): 27–86.Google Scholar
Mihas, Elena. 2010. Essentials of Ashéninka Perené grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
O’Hagan, Zachary and Michael, Lev. 2015. On exuberant noun categorization in Matsigenka (Arawak): Gender, animacy, and a multiple classifier system. Talk given at the Gender and Classifiers: Areal and Genealogical Perspectives Workshop, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, 27 January 2015. Available online at: http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~zjohagan/presentations.Google Scholar
Payne, David. 1981. The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa. (SIL Publications in Linguistics 66). Dallas, TX: SIL International; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Payne, David. 1991. A classification of Maipuran (Arawakan) languages based on shared lexical retentions. In Derbyshire, Desmond and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. III, pp. 355–499. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Payne, David. 2002. Causatives in Asheninka: The case for associative source. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, pp. 485–505. (Typological Studies in Language 48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Payne, David and Payne, Judith. 2005. The pragmatics of split intransitivity in Asheninka. Revista Latinoamericana de Estidios Ethnolingüísticos 10: 37–56.Google Scholar
Payne, Judith. 1982. Directionals as time referentials in Asheninca. Anthropological Linguistics 24: 325–37.Google Scholar
Payne, Judith. 1989. Lecciones para el aprendizaje del idioma ashéninca. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 28). Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación y Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Payne, Judith. 1990. Asheninka stress patterns. In Payne, Doris L. (ed.), Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages, pp. 185–209. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth and Kindberg, Willard. 1956. A problem in multiple stresses. Word 12: 415–28.Google Scholar
Piratsi. Animales. 1998. Libro de lectura y escritura 6 ashéninca pajonalino, con la traducción castellano. Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Reed, Judith and Payne, David. 1986. Ashéninca (Campa) pronominals. In Wiesemann, Ursula (ed.), Pronominal systems, pp. 323–31. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Romani Miranda, Maggie M. 2004. Toponimia en el Gran Pajonal con especial atención a los topónimos de afiliación Ashaninka. BA thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
Santos-Granero, Fernando and Barclay, Frederica. 1998. Selva central: History, economy, and land use in Peruvian Amazonia, trans. King, Elizabeth. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Shaler, Dattie. 1971. Idenitification of clause types and participant roles in Pajonal Campa. Ms.Google Scholar
Shaver, Harold. 1996. Diccionario Nomatsiguenga-Castellano, Castellano-Nomatsiguenga. Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Glenn, Shepard Jr.. 1997. Noun classification and ethnozoological classification in Machigenga. The Journal of Amazonian Languages 1(1): 30–59.Google Scholar
Snell, Betty A. 2011. Diccionario matsigenka-castellano. Con índice castellano, notas enciclopédicas, y apuntes gramaticales. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 56). Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Snell, Betty A. and Fonseca, Gustavo Solís. 2005. Tata onkantakera niagantsipage anianeegiku: Diccionario escolar Machiguenga. Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Solís Fonseca, Gustavo. 1973. Fonología machiguenga (arawak). (Documento de Trabajo 24). MA thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
Solís Fonseca, Gustavo 2003. Lenguas en la Amazonia Peruana. Lima: Visual Service S.R.L.Google Scholar
Spring, Cari. 1990. Implications of Axininca Campa for prosodic morphology and reduplication. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Swift, Kenneth. 1988. Morfología del caquinte (Arawak Preandino). (Serie Lingüística Peruana 25). Lima: Instituto Lingüístico del Verano.Google Scholar
Van Gijn, Rik. 2014. The Andean foothills and adjacent Amazonian fringe. In O’Connor, Loretta and Muysken, Pieter (eds.), The Native languages of South America: Origins, development, typology, pp. 102–25. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina and Muysken, Pieter. 2011. Subordination in South America: An overview. In Van Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina and Muysken, Pieter (eds.), Subordination in Native South American languages, pp. 1–24. (Typological Studies in Language 97). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Weber, David (ed.). 1987. Juan del Oso. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 26). Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 1971. Identification of participants in discourse: A study of aspects of form and meaning in Nomatsiguenga. (Summer Institute of Linguistics Publications in Linguistics and Related Fields 28). Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics of the University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 1986. Grammatical characteristics of Preandine Arawakan languages of Peru. In Derbyshire, Desmond and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. I, pp. 567–642. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 1990. Valence-changing affixes in Maipuran Arawakan languages. In Payne, Doris L. (ed.), Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages, pp. 89–116. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 2002. Applicative suffixes in Peruvian Amazonian languages. In Crevels, Mily, van de Kerke, Simon, Meira, Sérgio and van der Voort, Hein (eds.), Current studies on South American Indian languages: Selected papers from the 50th International Congress of Americanists in Warsaw and the Spinoza workshop on Amerindian languages in Leiden, 2000, pp. 329–44. (Indigenous Languages of Latin America 3). Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian studies.Google Scholar
References
Adams, B. A. 1983. A Tagmemic analysis of the Wolaitta language. PhD thesis, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Ahland, Michael Bryan. 2012. A grammar of Northern Mao (MÀWÉS AAS’È). PhD thesis, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Yilma, Aklilu 2003. Comparative phonology of the Maji languages. Journal of Ethiopian Studies 36(2): 59–88.Google Scholar
Allan, Edward J. 1976b. Dizi. In Bender, M. L. (ed.), The non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia, pp. 377–92. (Monograph No. 5, Occasional Papers Series, Committee on Ethiopian Studies 1). East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb 1996. Tone-accent and prosodic domains in Wolaitta. Studies in African Linguistics 25(2):111–38.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb 2001a. The Maale language. CNWS Publications, Vol. 99. Leiden University. CNWS.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb 2001b. Ideophones and compound verbs in Wolaitta. In Killian-Hatz, Christa and Voeltz, F. K. E. (eds.), Ideophones, pp. 49–62. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamin.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb 2006. Gender and animacy in Maale in comparative perspective. In Uhlig, S. (ed.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ethiopian Studies, pp. 704–14. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb 2007a. Are -a- and -o- in the indicative verb paradigms of Zargulla nominalizers? In Azeb, Ahma, Graziano, Savá and Mous, Maarten (eds.), Omotic and Cushitic languages studies: Papers from the Fourth Cushitic-Omotic Conference, Leiden, 10–12 April 2003, pp. 1–22. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb 2007b. Questioning forms in Zargulla. In Voigt, Rainer (ed.), ‘From Beyond the Mediterranean’: Akten des 7. internationalen Semitohamitistenkongresses, Berlin 13–15, September 2004, pp. 197–210. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb 2007c. Non-verbal predication in Wolaitta. In Crass, Joachim and Meyer, Ronny (eds.), Deictics, copula and focus in the Ethiopian Convergence Area, pp. 99–117. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb 2009a. Participant marking and valence in Wolaitta. In Dimmendaal, Gerrit (ed.), Coding participant marking: Construction types in twelve African languages, pp. 355–84. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb 2009. The morpho-syntax of negation in Zargulla. In Wetzels, Leo (ed.), The linguistics of endangered languages: Contributions to morphology and morpho-syntax, pp. 199–220. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb 2010. Compound verbs and ideophones in Wolaitta revisited. In Amberber, Mengistu, Baker, Brett and Harvey, Mark (eds.), Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, pp. 259–90. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb 2012. Omotic. In Frajzyngier, Zygmunt and Shay, Erin (eds.), The Afroasiatic languages, pp. 423–504. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ahland, Michael Bryan 2013. Demonstratives and directionals in Wolaitta. Paper presented at the LCRC weekly meeting. The Cairns Institute, JCU Cairns, Australia.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb Forthcoming. Male drums and female drums: Gender and inanimate nouns in Oyda. Gender, culture and cognition. Special issue of the International Journal of Language and Culture (ed. Alvanoudi, Angeliki).Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb and Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.. 2006a. Verbal compounding in Wolaitta. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 319–37. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Amha, Azeb and Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.. 2006b. Converbs in an African perspective. In Ameka, F. K., Dench, Alan and Evans, Nicholas (eds.), Catching languages: Issues in grammar writing, pp. 393–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Beachy, Marvin Dean. 2005. An overview of central Dizin phonology and morphology. MA thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Bender, M. Lionel. 1991. Comparative Aroid (South Omotic) syntax and morphosyntax. Afrika und Übersee 74: 87–110.Google Scholar
Bender, M. L. 2000. Comparative morphology of the Omotic languages. (Lincom Studies in African Linguistics 19). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Bender, M. L. 2003. Omotic lexicon and phonology. Southern Illinois University: SIU Printing/Duplicating.Google Scholar
Breeze, Mary J. 1986. Personal pronouns in Gimira. In Wiesemann, Ursula (ed.), Pronominal systems, pp. 47–69. (Continuum 5). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Breeze, Mary J. 1990. A sketch of the phonology and grammar of Gimira (Benchnon). In Hayward, R. J. (ed.), Omotic studies, pp. 1–67. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goshu, Debela and Demeke, Girma A.. 2005. A grammatical sketch and some socio-linguistic aspects of a dying language, Anfillo. Ethiopian Languages Research Centre Working Papers 1(1): 53–86.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit. 2007. Africa’s verb-final languages. In Heine, Bernd and Nurse, Derek (eds.), A linguistic geography of Africa, pp. 271–307. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax. Berlin and New York: Mouton.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2003. Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 27(1): 61–112Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. Adjective classes in typological perspective. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Adjective classes, pp. 1–49. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, Harold. 1976. Omotic overview. In Bender, M. L. (ed.), The non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia, pp. 298–323. (Monograph No. 5, Occasional Papers Series, Committee on Ethiopian Studies 1). East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Hayward, R. J. 1987. Terminal vowels in Ometo nominals. In Jungraithmayr, H. and Müller, W. W. (eds.), Proceedings of the fourth International Hamito-Semitic Congress, Marburg, September 20–22, 1983, pp. 215–31. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins,Google Scholar
Hayward, R. J. 1988. Remarks on Omotic sibilants. In Bechhaus-Gerst, M. and Serzisko, F. (eds.), Cushitic and Omotic: Papers from the International Symposium on Cushitic and Omotic Languages, Cologne, January 6–9, 1986, pp. 263–99. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Hayward, R. J. 1990a. Notes on the Zayse Language. In Hayward, R. J. (ed.), Omotic language studies, pp. 210–355. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Hayward, R. J. 1990b. Notes on the Aari language. In Hayward, R. J. (ed.), Omotic language studies, pp. 425–93. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Hayward, R. J. 1995. The Challenge of Omotic (an inaugural lecture). School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Hayward, R. J. 2003. Omotic. The ‘empty quarter’ of Afroasiatic Linguistics. In Lecarme, Jacqueline (ed.), Research in Afroasiatic grammar II: Selected papers from the fifth Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Paris, 2000, pp. 241–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hirut, Woldemariam. 2001. Demonstratives in Dawuro. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere. (Special issue on North-East Africa linguistic and literary studies) 65: 157–67.Google Scholar
Hirut, Woldemariam 2003. The grammar of Haro with comparative notes on the Ometo linguistic group. PhD thesis, Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar
Hirut, Woldemariam 2005. Historical notes on numerals in Ometo: The obsolete quinary system. Journal of Ethiopian Studies 38(1/2): 131–50.Google Scholar
Woldemariam, Hirut. 2007. Deictics in Gamo. In Crass, Joachim and Meyer, Ronny (eds.), Deictics, copula and focus in the Ethiopian Convergence Area, pp. 129–38. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Hompó, Éva. 1990. Grammatical relations in Gamo: A pilot sketch. In Hayward, R. J. (ed.), Omotic language studies, pp. 356–405. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Hudson, Grover. 2005. 75 Ethiopian languages: 19 Cushitic, 20 Nilosaharan, 23 Omotic, 12 Semitic and 1 unclassified. Unpublished paper. Available online at: www.msu.edu/~hudson/Ethlgs.pdf.Google Scholar
König, Christa. 2006. Marked nominative in Africa. Studies in Language 30(4): 655–732.Google Scholar
Lydall, Jean. 1976. Hamar. In Bender, M. L. (ed.), The non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia, pp. 393–438. (Monograph No. 5, Occasional Papers Series, Committee on Ethiopian Studies 1). East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Yigezu, Moges. 2007. The vowel system of Kara from a historical-comparative perspective. In Voigt, Rainer (ed.), ‘From beyond the mediterranean’. Akten des 7. Internationalen Semitohamitistenkongresses, pp. 245–51. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
Rapold, Christian J. 2006. Towards a Grammar of Benchnon. PhD thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Rottland, Franz. 1990. A sketch of Shinasha morphology. In Hayward, R. J. (ed.), Omotic Language Studies, pp. 185–209. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Theil, Rolf. 2007. Kafa phonology. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 28(2): 193–216.Google Scholar
Theil, Rolf. 2013: Koorete tonology. In Simeone-Senelle, M.-C. and Vanhove, Martine (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cushitic and Omotic Languages, Paris, April 16–18, 2008, pp. 167–74. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
Unseth, Peter. 1990. Linguistic bibliography of the non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia. East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
Wedekind, K. 1983. A six-tone language in Ethiopia: Tonal analysis of Benchnon (Gimira). Journal of Ethiopian Studies 16: 129–56.Google Scholar
Wedekind, K. 1985. Why Bench (Ethiopia) has five level tones today. In Pieper, Ursula and Stickel, Gerhard (eds.), Studia linguistica diachronica et synchronica, pp. 881–901. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wedekind, K. 1990. Gimo-Jan or Ben-Yem-Om: Beng-Yemsa Phonemes, Tones and Words, In Hayward, R. J. (ed.), Omotic language studies, pp. 68–184. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Zaborski, Andrzej. 1983. Basic numeral in Omotic languages. In Segert, S. and Bodrogligeti, A. J. E. (eds.), Ethiopian studies, pp. 123–42. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
References
Appleyard, David L. 2004. Some thoughts on the origin of the Amharic object marker -[ə]n. In Böll, V., Nosnitsin, D., Rave, T., Smidt, W. and Sokolinskaia, E. (eds.), Studia Aethiopica: In honour of Siegbert Uhlig on the occasion of his 65th birthday, pp. 291–301. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. 2014a. Notes on the history of reciprocal NP-strategies in Semitic languages in a typological perspective. Diachronica 31: 337–78.Google Scholar
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. 2014b. From non-argument-dative to an argument-dative: The character and origin of the qṭīl lī construction in Syriac and Jewish Babylonian Aramaic. Folia Orientalia 51: 59–101.Google Scholar
Cook, John A. 2006. The finite verbal forms in Biblical Hebrew do express aspect. Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society 30: 21–35.Google Scholar
Cowell, Mark W. 1964. A reference grammar of Syrian Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Guy. 2000. Stability against the odds? The survival of verb final order in Akkadian. In Sornicola, Rosanna, Poppe, Erich and Shisha-Halevy, Ariel (eds.), Stability, change and variation in word-order patterns over time, pp. 55–69. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Erwin, Wallace M. 1963. A short reference grammar of Iraqi Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Fassberg, Steven E. 1999. The Lengthened Imperative קָטְלָה in Biblical Hebrew. Hebrew Studies 40: 7–13.Google Scholar
Gensler, Orin D. 2011. Morphological typology of Semitic. In Weninger, Stefan (ed.), in collaboration with Khan, Geoffrey, Streck, Michael P. and Watson, Janet C. E., The Semitic languages: An international handbook, pp. 279–302. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hasselbach, Rebecca. 2013. Case in Semitic: Roles, relations, and reconstruction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hetzron, Robert. 1967. Agaw numerals and incongruence in Semitic. Journal of Semitic Studies 12: 169–97.Google Scholar
Hoberman, Robert D. and Aronoff, Mark. 2003. The verbal morphology of Maltese: From Semitic to Romance. In Shimron, Joseph (ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based, morphology, pp. 61–78. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, John. 2003. Akkadian ḫ and West Semitic ḥ. In Kogan, Leonid (ed.), Orientalia: Papers of the Oriental Institute 3, pp. 102–19. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, John. 2004. Afro-Asiatic. In Woodard, Roger (ed.), Cambridge encyclopedia of the world’s ancient languages, pp.138–59. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, John. 2006. On the etymology of the Hebrew Relative šɛ-. In Fassberg, Steven E. and Hurvitz, Avi (eds.), Biblical Hebrew in Its Northwest Semitic setting: Typological and historical perspectives, pp.103–25. Jerusalem: Magnes.Google Scholar
Jastrow, Otto. 1990. Der arabische Dialekt der Juden von ‘Aqra und Arbīl. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Joosten, Jan. 1998. The functions of the Semitic D stem: Biblical Hebrew materials for a comparative-historical approach. Orientalia 67: 202–30.Google Scholar
Joosten, Jan. 2002. Do the finite verbal forms in Biblical Hebrew express aspect? Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society 29: 49–70.Google Scholar
Kapeliuk, Olga. 2011. Creating adverbs in Amharic. In Busetto, Luca, Sottile, Roberto, Tonelli, Livia and Tosco, Mauro (eds.), He bitaney lagge: Studies on language and African linguistics in honour of Marcello Lamberti, pp. 81–90. Milan: Qu.A.S.A.R.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey. 1999. A grammar of the Neo-Aramaic dialect of the Jews of Arbel. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey. 2008. The expression of definiteness in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects. In Gzella, Holger and Folmer, Margaretha L. (eds.), Aramaic in its historical linguistic setting, pp. 209–26. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Khan, Geoffrey. 2015. Ergativity in Neo-Aramaic. In Coon, Jessica, Massam, Diane and Travis, Lisa (eds.), Oxford handbook of ergativity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kogan, Leonid. 2011. Proto-Semitic phonetics and phonology. In Weninger, Stefan (ed.), in collaboration with Khan, Geoffrey, Streck, Michael P. and Watson, Janet C. E., The Semitic languages: An international handbook, pp. 54–151. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leslau, Wolf. 1945. The influence of Cushitic on the Semitic languages of Ethiopia: A problem of substratum. Word 1: 59–82.Google Scholar
Leslau, Wolf. 1999. Zway Ethiopic documents: Grammar and dictionary. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Lonnet, Antoine. 1998. Le Socotri: une métamorphose contrariée. In Medlaoui, Mohamed El, Gafaiti, Said and Saa, Fouad (eds.), Actes du 1er congrès Chamito-Sémitique de Fès, pp. 69–85. Fes: Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines Saïs-Fès.Google Scholar
Melles, Mulugeta Girmay. 2001. Tigrinya grammar and reader. Springfield, VA: Dunwoody.Google Scholar
Meyer, Ronny. 2005. Das Zay: Deskriptive Grammatik einer Ostguragesprache (Äthiosemitisch). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Meyer, Ronny. 2006. Wolane: Descriptive grammar of an East Gurage language (Ethiosemitic). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Muraoka, Takamitsu and Porten, Bezalel. 2003. A grammar of Egyptian Aramaic, 2nd edn. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nöldeke, Theodor. [1904] 2001. Compendious Syriac grammar, 2nd edn, trans. Crichton, James A.. London: Williams and Norgate. Reprinted Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Pat-El, Na‘ama. 2014. The morphosyntax of nominal antecedents in Semitic, and an innovation in Arabic. In Edzard, Lutz and Huehnergard, John (eds.), Proceedings of the Oslo–Austin Workshop in Semitic Linguistics: Oslo, May 23 and 24, 2013, pp. 28–47. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D. 2004. Notes on the genitive exponents of some Modern Arabic dialects. Folia Orientalia 40: 327–37.Google Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D. 2005. Studies in Semitic grammaticalization. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D. 2008. The subgrouping of the Semitic languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 61–84.Google Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D. 2010a. A brief introduction to the Semitic languages. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias.Google Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D. 2010c. The development of the Amharic definite article and an Indonesian parallel. Journal of Semitic Studies 55: 103–14.Google Scholar
Rubin, Aaron D. 2014. The Jibbali (Shaḥri) language of Oman: Grammar and texts. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ryding, Karin C. 2005. A reference grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
von Soden, Wolfram. 1995. Grundriss der akkadischen Grammatik, 3rd edn. With the assistance of Meyer, W.. Rome: Pontificio Istituto Biblico.Google Scholar
Steiner, Richard C. 1977. The case for fricative-laterals in Proto-Semitic. New Haven: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Tropper, Josef. 2002. Altäthiopisch: Grammatik des Ge‘ez mit Übungstexten und Glossar. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Waltisberg, Michael. 2002. Zur Ergativitätshypothese im Semitischen. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 152: 11–62.Google Scholar
Waltisberg, Michael. 2011. Syntactic typology of Semitic. In Weninger, Stefan (ed.), in collaboration with Khan, Geoffrey, Streck, Michael P. and Watson, Janet C. E., The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook, pp. 303–29. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
References
Asher, R. E. and Kumari, T. C.. 1997. Malayalam. Descriptive Grammars. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bray, Denys de S. 1909. The Brahui language. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing, India.Google Scholar
Burrow, Thomas and Bhattacharya, S.. 1953. The Parji language. Hertford: Stephen Austin and Sons.Google Scholar
Burrow, Thomas and Bhattacharya, S.. 1970. The Pengo language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray B. 1984. Toda grammar and texts. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh. 1969. Konda or Kubi, a Dravidian language. Hyderabad: Tribal Cultural Research & Training Institute, Government of Andhra Pradesh.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh. 2001. Comparative Dravidian linguistics: Current perspectives. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bh. and Gwynn, J. P. L.. 1985. A grammar of Modern Telugu. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steever, Sanford B. 1988. The serial verb formation in the Dravidian languages. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Steever, Sanford B. 1993. From analysis to synthesis: The development of complex verb morphology in the Dravidian languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Subbarao, Karumari V. 2012. South Asian Languages: A syntactic typology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2006. Serial verb constructions in typological perspective. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 1–68. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Kaliko C. M. 2012. A-class genitive subject effect: A pragmatic and discourse grammar approach to a- and o-class genitive subject selection in Hawaiian. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Bellwood, Peter, Fox, James J. and Tryon, Darrell (eds.). 1995/2006. The Austronesians: Historical and comparative perspectives. Canberra: Australian National University E-Press.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko. 2000. Tuvaluan. A Polynesian language of the Central Pacific. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhat, Shankara D. N. 1999. The prominence of tense, aspect, and mood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 1988. The Austronesian homeland: A linguistic perspective. Asian Perspectives 26(1): 45–67.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2001. Some remarks on stress, syncope, and gemination in Mussau. Oceanic Linguistics 40(1): 143–50.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2005. Review of ‘The Oceanic Languages’ by John Lynch; Malcolm Ross; Terry Crowley. Oceanic Linguistics 44(2): 544–58.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2011. Sivisa Titan: Sketch grammar, texts, vocabulary based on material collected by P. Josef Meier and Po Minis. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Bril, Isabelle. 2002. Le nêlêmwa (Nouvelle-Calédonie): Analyse syntactique et sémantique. (Collection Langues et Cultures du Pacifique 16. Société des Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France 403). Paris: Peeters Press.Google Scholar
Bril, Isabelle. 2013. Ownership, part-whole and other possessive-associative relations in Nêlêmwa (New Caledonia). In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 65–89. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bril, Isabelle and Ozanne-Rivierre, Françoise (eds.). 2004. Complex predicates in Oceanic languages: Studies in the dynamics of binding and boundness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brownie, John and Brownie, Marjo. 2007. Mussau grammar essentials. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Capell, Arthur. 1935. The Sikayana language: A preliminary grammar and vocabulary. Part 1-Grammar. The Journal of the Polynesian Society 44(3): 163–72.Google Scholar
Corston-Oliver, Simon H. 2003. Core arguments and the inversion of the nominal hierarchy in Roviana. In Du Bois, John W, Kumpf, Lorraine Edith and Ashby, William J. (eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, pp. 273–300. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 1998. An Erromangan (Sye) grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 1999. Ura: A disappearing language of southern Vanuatu. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 2002. Serial verbs in Oceanic: A descriptive typology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 2006. Naman: A vanishing language of Malakula (Vanuatu). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Davis, Karen. 2003. A grammar of the Hoava language, Western Solomon. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Dempwolff, Otto. 1934–8. Vergleichende Lautlehre des austronesischen Wortschatzes, 3 vols. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Dempwolff, Otto, Bradshaw, Joel and Czobor, Francisc. 2005. Otto Dempwolff’s Grammar of the Jabêm Language in New Guinea. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Dimock, Laura Gail. 2009. A grammar of Nahavaq (Malakula, Vanuatu). PhD, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. Adjective classes in typological perspective. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Adjective classes: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 1–49. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Janet. 1983. West Futuna-Aniwa: An introduction to a Polynesian outlier language. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Durie, Mark. 1988. Verb serialization and ‘verbal-prepositions’ in Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics 27(1/2): 1–23.Google Scholar
Elbert, Samuel H. and Pukui, Mary Kawena. 1979. Hawaiian grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Bethwyn. 2003. A study of valency-changing devices in Proto Oceanic. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2001. Contraintes de structures et liberté dans l’organisation du discours. Une description du mwotlap, langue océanienne du Vanuatu. PhD, Université Paris-IV Sorbonne.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2002. Araki, a disappearing language of Vanuatu. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2005. Unraveling the history of the vowels of seventeen Northern Vanuatu languages. Oceanic Linguistics 44(2): 443–504.Google Scholar
Frostad, Benedicte Haralsdstad. 2012. A grammar of Ughele: An Oceanic language of Solomon Islands. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Glennon, John J. 2014. Syntactic ergativity in Nehan. MA, Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
Goodenough, Ward. 1992. Gradual and quantum changes in the history of Chuukese (Trukese) phonology. Oceanic Linguistics 31(1): 93–114.Google Scholar
Gray, Russell D. and Jordan, Fiona M.. 2000. Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion. Nature 405: 1052–5.Google Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J. and Gray, Russell D.. 2009. Austronesian language phylogenies: Myths and misconceptions about Bayesian computational methods. In Adelaar, Alexander and Pawley, Andrew (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A festschrift for Robert Blust, pp. 375–97. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hajek, John and Stevens, Mary. 2004. Tonal activity in Kara, an Austronesian language spoken in New Britain. Paper presented at the 10th Australian International Conference on Speech Science & Technology, Macquarie University, Sydney.Google Scholar
Hamel, Patricia. 1988. A grammar and lexicon of Loniu, Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Catriona. 2001. The Lolovoli dialect of the North-East Ambae language, Vanuatu. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Catriona. 2004. Adjective in North-East Ambae. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra (eds.), Adjective classes: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 263–82. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jauncey, Dorothy. 2002. Tamabo. In Lynch, John, Ross, Malcolm and Crowley, Terry (eds.), The Oceanic languages, pp. 608–25. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
Jauncey, Dorothy. 2011. A grammar of Tamambo, the language of Western Malo, Vanuatu. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Jensen, John Thayer. 1977. Yapese reference grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Kikusawa, Ritsuko. 2002. Proto Central Pacific ergativity: Its reconstruction and development in the Fijian, Rotuman and Polynesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lacrampe, Sébastien. 2009. Possession in Lelepa, a language of Central Vanuatu. MA thesis, University of the South Pacific, Port Vila.Google Scholar
Lee, Kee-Dong. 1975. Kusaiean reference grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1983. A grammar of Manam. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1985. Possessive constructions in Oceanic languages and in Proto-Oceanic. In Pawley, Andrew and Carrington, Lois (eds.), Austronesian linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress, pp. 93–140. Canberra: Pacific Linguistic.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1991. Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language 67(3): 475–509.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 2002. The Possessive-benefactive connection. Oceanic Linguistics 41(2): 439–74.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 2009. Proprietives in Oceanic. In Evans, Bethwyn (ed.), Discovering history through language: Papers in honour of Malcolm Ross, pp. 363–89. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Piet C. 1978. Reef-Santa Cruz as Austronesian. In Wurm, S. A. and Carrington, Lois (eds.), Second international conference on Austronesian linguistics: Proceedings, pp. 929–67. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lynch, John, Ross, Malcolm and Crowley, Terry (eds.). 2002. The Oceanic languages. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna. 1999. Valence and transitivity in Saliba, an Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna. 2004. From implicature to construction: Emergence of a benefactive construction in Oceanic. Oceanic Linguistics 33(4): 445–68.Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike. 1984. Tolai syntax and its historical development. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike. 2010. The fourth person in Teop. In Bowden, John, Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. and Ross, Malcolm (eds.), A journey through Austronesian and Papuan linguistic and cultural space: Papers in honour of Andrew Pawley, pp. 391–404. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike and Thiesen, Yvonne. n.d. The Teop sketch grammar. Available online at: https://corpus1.mpi.nl/ds/asv/;jsessionid=99DBA7FDE425D6A9F4700B387A57037C?0&openpath=node:533750.Google Scholar
Moyse-Faurie, Claire. 1995. Le xârâcùù, langue de Thio-Canala (Nouvelle-Calédonie). Éléments de syntaxe. (Société des Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France 355). Paris: Peeters Press.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild and Hovdhaugen, Even. 2011. A grammar of Vaeakau-Taumako Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, Peterson, David A. and Barnes, Jonathan. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2): 149–211.Google Scholar
Ozanne-Rivierre, Françoise. 1976. Le Iaai: Langue mélanésienne d’Ouvéa (Nouvelle-Calédonie). Paris: Société des Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 2003. Locating Proto Oceanic. In Ross, Malcolm, Pawley, Andrew and Osmond, Meredith (eds.), The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society. The physical environment, Vol. II, pp. 17–34. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew and Green, Roger. 1973. Dating the dispersal of the Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics 12(1/2): 1–67.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew and Ross, Malcolm. 1993. Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history. Annual Review of Anthropology 22: 425–59.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew and Ross, Malcolm. 1995/2006. The prehistory of Oceanic languages: A current view. In Bellwood, Peter, Fox, James J. and Tryon, Darrell (eds.), The Austronesians: Historical and comparative perspectives, pp. 43–80. Canberra: Australian National University E-Press. Available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/austronesians/austronesians/html/frames.php?page=&chapters=h.Google Scholar
Rehg, Kenneth. 1981. Ponapean reference grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Rivierre, Jean-Claude. 1993. Tonogenesis in New Caledonia. In Edmondson, Jerold and Gregerson, Kenneth (eds.), Tonality in Austronesian languages, pp. 155–73. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1988. Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of Western Melanesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1993. Tonogenesis in the North Huon gulf chain. In Edmondson, Jerold and Gregerson, Kenneth (eds.), Tonality in Austronesian languages, pp. 133–54. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 2004a. The grammaticization of directional verbs in Oceanic languages. In Bril, Isabelle and Ozanne-Rivierre, Françoise (eds.), Complex predicates in Oceanic languages: Studies in the dynamics of binding and boundness, pp. 297–330. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 2004b. The morphosyntactic typology of Oceanic languages. Language and Linguistics 5(2): 491–541.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm and Åshild, Næss. 2007. An Oceanic origin for Äiwoo, the language of the Reef Islands? Oceanic Linguistics 46(2): 456–98.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm, Pawley, Andrew and Osmond, Meredith. 2008. Introduction. In Ross, Malcolm, Pawley, Andrew and Osmond, Meredith (eds.), The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society, Vol. III: Plants, pp. 1–24. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sato, Hiroko. 2013. Grammar of Kove: An Austronesian language of the West New Britain province, Papua New Guinea. PhD, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Schneider, Cynthia. 2010. A grammar of Abma: A language of Pentecost Island, Vanuatu. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Schokkin, Gerda. 2013. A grammar of Paluai, the language of Baluan Island, Papua New Guinea. PhD, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.Google Scholar
Senft, Gunter. 1986. Kilivila: The language of the Trobriand islanders. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Senft, Gunter. (ed.). 2008. Serial verb constructions in Austronesian and Papuan languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min and Bender, Byron W.. 1973. A Ulithian grammar. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sperlich, Wolfgang. 1991. Namakir: A description of a Central Vanuatu language. PhD, University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Spriggs, Matthew. 2011. Archaeology and the Austronesian expansion: Where are we now? Antiquity 85: 510–28.Google Scholar
Sugita, Hiroshi. 1973. Semitransitive verbs and object incorporation in Micronesian languages. Oceanic Linguistics 12(1/2): 393–406.Google Scholar
Thieberger, Nicholas. 2006. A grammar of South Efate: An Oceanic language of Vanuatu. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. Linguistic and social typology: The Austronesian migrations and phoneme inventories. Linguistic Typology 8: 305–20.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, René. 2007. An unusual passive in Western Oceanic: The case of Vitu. Oceanic Linguistics 46(1): 54–70.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, René. 2015. The loss of clusivity and the rise of gender in West Oceanic pronominals. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 33(1): 10–47.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, René and Bachet, Wilson. 2006. Vitu grammar sketch. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Van Der Mark, Sheena Chantal. 2007. A grammar of Vinitiri. An Austronesian language of Papua New Guinea. PhD, La Trobe University, Research Centre for Linguistic Typology.Google Scholar
Whitacre, Steve. 1986. Arop/Sissano grammar essentials. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
White, Geoffrey. 1988. Cheke Holo (Maringe/Hograno) dictionary. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wilson, William. 1976. The o/a distinction in Hawaiian possessives. Oceanic Linguistics 15(1/2): 39–50.Google Scholar
Wozna, Beata and Wilson, Theresa. 2005. Seimat grammar essentials. Ukarumpa: Summer Institue of Linguistics.Google Scholar
References
Baas, P. 1981. Tsakwambo Taalstudie. Unpublished language survey and language learning notes by missionary Peter Baas.Google Scholar
Boelaars, J. H. M. C. 1970. Mandobo’s tussen de Digoel en de Kao, bijdragen tot een etnografie. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Chappell, John. 2005. Geographic changes of coastal lowlands in the Papuan past. In Pawley, et al. (eds.), pp. 525–41.Google Scholar
Cysouw, M. 2003. The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Drabbe, P. 1950. Twee dialecten van de Awju-taal. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 106: 92–147.Google Scholar
Drabbe, P. 1957. Spraakkunst van het Aghu-dialect van de Awju-taal. Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. 2013. Order of relative clause and noun. In Dryer, M. S. and Haspelmath, M. (eds.), The world atlas of language structures on line. Leipzig Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available on line at http://wals.info/chapter/90.Google Scholar
van Enk, G. J. and de Vries, L.. 1997. The Korowai of Irian Jaya: Their language in its cultural context. Oxord University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, W. A. 2000. The languages of New Guinea. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 357–404.Google Scholar
Foley, W. A. 2005. Personhood and linguistic identity, purism and variation. Language Documentation and Description 3: 157–80.Google Scholar
Healy, A. 1970. Proto Awyu-Dumut phonology. In Wurm, S. A. and Laycock, D. C. (eds.), Pacific studies in honour of Arthur Capell, pp. 997–1062. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Heeschen, Volkert. 1998. An ethnographic grammar of the Eipo language. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, W. 2015. Aghu: Annotated texts with grammatical introduction and vocabulary lists. Unpublished manuscript, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
van den Heuvel, W. and Fedden, S.. 2013. Greater Awyu and Greater Ok: Inheritance or contact? Oceanic Linguistics 54(1): 1–35.Google Scholar
Jang, H. T. 2008. Morphology and syntax of Wambon: A grammar sketch. Unpublished grammar sketch. SIL International Indonesia Branch.Google Scholar
Lean, G. 1992. Counting systems of Papua New Guinea and Oceania. PhD thesis, University of Technology, Papua New Guinea.Google Scholar
Pawley, A. 2005. The chequered career of the Trans New Guinea hypothesis. In Pawley, et al. (eds.), pp. 67–108.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., Attenborough, R., Golson, J. and Hide, R. (eds.). 2005. Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Reesink, G. P. 1987. Structures and their functions in Usan, a Papuan language of Papua New Guinea. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Reesink, G. P. 1993. Inner speech in Papuan languages. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 24: 217–25.Google Scholar
Stasch, R. 2001. Figures of alterity among Korowai of Irian Jaya. Kinship, mourning and festivity in a dispersed society. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Stasch, R. 2007. Demon language: The otherness of Indonesian in a Papuan community. In Makihara, Miki and Schieffelin, Bambi B. (eds.), Consequences of contact: Language ideology and sociocultural transformations in Pacific societies, pp. 96–124. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stasch, R. 2008. Referent-wrecking in Korowai: A New Guinea abuse register as ethnosemiotic protest. Language in Society 37(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Stasch, R. 2009. Society of others: Kinship and mourning in a West Papuan place. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, C. L. 1971. Miscellaneous notes on Languages of West Irian, New Guinea. In Dutton, T., Voorhoeve, C. L. and Wurm, S. A. (eds.), Papers in New Guinea Linguistics 14, pp. 47–114. Canberra. Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, C. L. 2001. Proto Awyu-Dumut phonology II. In Pawley, A., Ross, M. and Tryon, D. (eds.), The boy from Bundaberg: Studies in Melanesian linguistics in honour of Tom Dutton, pp. 361–81. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, C. L. 2005. Asmat-Kamoro, Awyu-Dumut and Ok: An enquiry into their linguistic relationships. In Pawley, et al. (eds.), pp. 145–66.Google Scholar
de Vries, L. 1986. The Wambon relator system. Working Papers in Functional Grammar. Vol. 17. University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
de Vries, L. 1987. Kombai kinship terminology. Irian: Bulletin of Irian Jaya 15: 105–26.Google Scholar
de Vries, L. 1993. Forms and functions in Kombai, an Awyu language of Irian Jaya. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
de Vries, L. 1995. Demonstratives, referent identification and topicality in Wambon and some other Papuan languages. Journal of Pragmatics 24: 513–33.Google Scholar
de Vries, L. 2005. Towards a typology of tail-head linkage in Papuan languages. Studies in Language 29(2): 363–84.Google Scholar
de Vries, L. 2006. Areal pragmatics of New Guinea: Thematization, distribution and recapitulative linkage in Papuan languages. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 811–28.Google Scholar
de Vries, L. 2010. From clause conjoining to clause chaining in Dumut languages of New Guinea. Studies in Language 34(2): 327–49.Google Scholar
de Vries, L. 2012a. Speaking of clans: Language in Awyu-Ndumut communities of Indonesian West Papua. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 214: 5–26.Google Scholar
de Vries, L. 2012b. Some notes on the Tsaukambo language of West Papua. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 2012: 165–93.Google Scholar
de Vries, L. 2013. Seeing, hearing and thinking in Korowai, a language of West Papua. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Storch, A. (eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture, pp. 111–36. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
de Vries, L.. 2014. Numerals in Papuan languages of the Greater Awyu family. In Storch, Anne and Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. (eds.), Number-constructions and semantics, pp. 329–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
de Vries, L. and Wiersma, R.. 1992. An outline of the morphology of Wambon of the Irian Jaya Upper-Digul area. Royal Institute of Linguistics and Anthropology. Leiden: KITLV Press.Google Scholar
de Vries, L., Wester, R. and van den Heuvel, W. 2012. The Greater Awyu language family of West Papua. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 2012: 269–312.Google Scholar
Wester, R. 2014. A linguistic history of Awyu-Dumut. Morphological study and reconstruction of a Papuan Language Family. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar