Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Diagrams
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene
- Part I Domains of Linguistic Typology
- Part II Typology of Grammatical Categories
- Part III Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
- 19 Language in the Mainland Southeast Asia Area
- 20 The Australian Linguistic Area
- 21 A Typological Overview of Aymaran and Quechuan Language Structure
- 22 The Eskimo-Aleut Language Family
- 23 The Athabaskan (Dene) Language Family
- 24 The Iroquoian Language Family
- 25 The Kampa Subgroup of the Arawak Language Family
- 26 The Omotic Language Family
- 27 The Semitic Language Family
- 28 The Dravidian Language Family
- 29 The Oceanic Subgroup of the Austronesian Language Family
- 30 Greater Awyu Languages of West Papua in Typological Perspective
- Index of Authors
- Index of Languages, Language Families and Linguistic Areas
- Index of Subjects
- References
25 - The Kampa Subgroup of the Arawak Language Family
from Part III - Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2017
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Diagrams
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene
- Part I Domains of Linguistic Typology
- Part II Typology of Grammatical Categories
- Part III Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families
- 19 Language in the Mainland Southeast Asia Area
- 20 The Australian Linguistic Area
- 21 A Typological Overview of Aymaran and Quechuan Language Structure
- 22 The Eskimo-Aleut Language Family
- 23 The Athabaskan (Dene) Language Family
- 24 The Iroquoian Language Family
- 25 The Kampa Subgroup of the Arawak Language Family
- 26 The Omotic Language Family
- 27 The Semitic Language Family
- 28 The Dravidian Language Family
- 29 The Oceanic Subgroup of the Austronesian Language Family
- 30 Greater Awyu Languages of West Papua in Typological Perspective
- Index of Authors
- Index of Languages, Language Families and Linguistic Areas
- Index of Subjects
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology , pp. 782 - 814Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999. The Arawak language family. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages, pp. 65–106. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The languages of the Amazon. (Oxford Linguistics). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2013. Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Possession and ownership, pp. 1–64. (Explorations in Linguistic Typology). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Ronald J. 1985. Cuentos folklóricos de los Asheninca, Vol. I. (Comunidades y Culturas Peruanas 18). Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Anderson, Ronald J. 1986. Cuentos folklóricos de los Asheninca, Vol. II. (Comunidades y Culturas Peruanas 18). Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Anderson, Ronald J. 2002. Historias de cambio de los ashéninka. (Comunidades y Culturas Peruanas 29). Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Anderson, Ronald J. 2005. Diferencias regionales reconocidas por los ‘campa’. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Lingüísticos 10: 111–22.Google Scholar
Base de Datos de Pueblos Indígenas u Originarios. 2013. Available online at: bdpi.cultura.gob.pe/lista-de-pueblos-indigenas [Accessed 13 December 2014].Google Scholar
Bodley, John H. 2003. The Power of scale: A global history approach. New York and London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2012. Classification of the indigenous languages of South America. In Campbell, Lyle and Grondona, Verónica (eds.), The Indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide, pp. 59–166. (The World of Linguistics 2). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochachi Vásquez, David, Domingo Prado, Cirílo, Romero, Rosa María Paulino and Cochachi Vásquez, Jhon Edgard (eds.). 2009. Opempe. Oshintsinka noñane. El poder de mi lengua. Satipo: AMABISEC y Andesbooks Editorial.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2007. Content interrogatives in Pichis Asheninka: Corpus study and typological comparison. International Journal of Linguistics 73: 133–63.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1986. Comparative survey of morphology and syntax in Brazilian Arawakan. In Derbyshire, Desmond and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. I, pp. 469–566. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dirks, Sylvester. 1953. Campa (Arawak) phonemes. International Journal of American Linguistics 19(4): 302–4.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory: Further grammatical topics, Vol. III. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. 1999. Introduction. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages, pp. 1–21. (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 2007. Word order. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. I: Clause structure, pp. 61–131. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fabián, Fernández, Clotilde, Liliana. 2011. Conectores discursivos en asháninka. BA thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
Salazar, García, Victoria, Gabriela. 1997. Generalidades de la morfologia y fonologia del ashéninca del Ucayali. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Etnolingüísticos 9: 1–101.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. On S, A, P, T and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Discovery 15(3): 535–67.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. Ditransitive constructions. The Annual Review of Linguistics 1: 19–41.Google Scholar
Heise, María, Payne, David, Payne, Judith and Vilchez, Elsa. 2000. Diccionario escolar ashaninka/asheninka. Lima: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
Heitzman, Allene. 1975. Correspondencias entre ciertos grupos de fonemas en varios dialectos campa. In Lingüística e indigenismo moderno de América: Trabajos presentados al XXXIX Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, Vol. V, pp. 165–79. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Kindberg, Lee D. 1961. Independent and dependent sentence types in Campa (Arawak). In Elson, Benjamin F. and Comas, Juan (eds.), A William Cameron Townsend en el vigésimoquinto aniversario del Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, pp. 519–53. Mexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Kindberg, Lee D. 1980. Diccionario asháninca. (Documento de Trabajo 19). Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Kindberg, Willard. 1961. Campa (Arawak) morphology. In Elson, Benjamin F. and Comas, Juan (eds.), A William Cameron Townsend en el vigésimoquinto aniversario del Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, pp. 519–53. Mexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Aimee. 2012. Reconstruction of Proto-Kampa verbal morphology. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, California, 11–12 February.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Aimee. 2013. Inflectional verbal morphology in Matsiguenga. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev. 2008. Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge and social action in an Amazonian society. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev. 2011. La reconstrucción y la clasificación interna de la rama Kampa de la familia Arawak. Paper presented at the Congreso de Idiomas Indígenas de Latinoamerica V, University of Texas, Austin, October 7.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev. 2012. Possession in Nanti. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 149–66. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev. 2014. The Nanti reality status system: Implications for the typological validity of the realis/irrealis contrast. Linguistic Typology 18(2): 251–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Lev, Chang, Will and Stark, Tammy. 2014. Exploring phonological areality in the circum-Andean region using a Naive Bayes Classifier. Language Dynamics and Change 4(1): 27–86.Google Scholar
Mihas, Elena. 2010. Essentials of Ashéninka Perené grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
O’Hagan, Zachary and Michael, Lev. 2015. On exuberant noun categorization in Matsigenka (Arawak): Gender, animacy, and a multiple classifier system. Talk given at the Gender and Classifiers: Areal and Genealogical Perspectives Workshop, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, 27 January 2015. Available online at: http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~zjohagan/presentations.Google Scholar
Payne, David. 1981. The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa. (SIL Publications in Linguistics 66). Dallas, TX: SIL International; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Payne, David. 1991. A classification of Maipuran (Arawakan) languages based on shared lexical retentions. In Derbyshire, Desmond and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. III, pp. 355–499. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Payne, David. 2002. Causatives in Asheninka: The case for associative source. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, pp. 485–505. (Typological Studies in Language 48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Payne, David and Payne, Judith. 2005. The pragmatics of split intransitivity in Asheninka. Revista Latinoamericana de Estidios Ethnolingüísticos 10: 37–56.Google Scholar
Payne, Judith. 1982. Directionals as time referentials in Asheninca. Anthropological Linguistics 24: 325–37.Google Scholar
Payne, Judith. 1989. Lecciones para el aprendizaje del idioma ashéninca. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 28). Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación y Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Payne, Judith. 1990. Asheninka stress patterns. In Payne, Doris L. (ed.), Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages, pp. 185–209. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth and Kindberg, Willard. 1956. A problem in multiple stresses. Word 12: 415–28.Google Scholar
Piratsi. Animales. 1998. Libro de lectura y escritura 6 ashéninca pajonalino, con la traducción castellano. Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Reed, Judith and Payne, David. 1986. Ashéninca (Campa) pronominals. In Wiesemann, Ursula (ed.), Pronominal systems, pp. 323–31. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Romani Miranda, Maggie M. 2004. Toponimia en el Gran Pajonal con especial atención a los topónimos de afiliación Ashaninka. BA thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
Santos-Granero, Fernando and Barclay, Frederica. 1998. Selva central: History, economy, and land use in Peruvian Amazonia, trans. King, Elizabeth. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Shaler, Dattie. 1971. Idenitification of clause types and participant roles in Pajonal Campa. Ms.Google Scholar
Shaver, Harold. 1996. Diccionario Nomatsiguenga-Castellano, Castellano-Nomatsiguenga. Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Glenn, Shepard Jr.. 1997. Noun classification and ethnozoological classification in Machigenga. The Journal of Amazonian Languages 1(1): 30–59.Google Scholar
Snell, Betty A. 2011. Diccionario matsigenka-castellano. Con índice castellano, notas enciclopédicas, y apuntes gramaticales. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 56). Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Snell, Betty A. and Fonseca, Gustavo Solís. 2005. Tata onkantakera niagantsipage anianeegiku: Diccionario escolar Machiguenga. Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Solís Fonseca, Gustavo. 1973. Fonología machiguenga (arawak). (Documento de Trabajo 24). MA thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
Solís Fonseca, Gustavo 2003. Lenguas en la Amazonia Peruana. Lima: Visual Service S.R.L.Google Scholar
Spring, Cari. 1990. Implications of Axininca Campa for prosodic morphology and reduplication. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Swift, Kenneth. 1988. Morfología del caquinte (Arawak Preandino). (Serie Lingüística Peruana 25). Lima: Instituto Lingüístico del Verano.Google Scholar
Van Gijn, Rik. 2014. The Andean foothills and adjacent Amazonian fringe. In O’Connor, Loretta and Muysken, Pieter (eds.), The Native languages of South America: Origins, development, typology, pp. 102–25. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina and Muysken, Pieter. 2011. Subordination in South America: An overview. In Van Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina and Muysken, Pieter (eds.), Subordination in Native South American languages, pp. 1–24. (Typological Studies in Language 97). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Weber, David (ed.). 1987. Juan del Oso. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 26). Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 1971. Identification of participants in discourse: A study of aspects of form and meaning in Nomatsiguenga. (Summer Institute of Linguistics Publications in Linguistics and Related Fields 28). Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics of the University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 1986. Grammatical characteristics of Preandine Arawakan languages of Peru. In Derbyshire, Desmond and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. I, pp. 567–642. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 1990. Valence-changing affixes in Maipuran Arawakan languages. In Payne, Doris L. (ed.), Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages, pp. 89–116. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 2002. Applicative suffixes in Peruvian Amazonian languages. In Crevels, Mily, van de Kerke, Simon, Meira, Sérgio and van der Voort, Hein (eds.), Current studies on South American Indian languages: Selected papers from the 50th International Congress of Americanists in Warsaw and the Spinoza workshop on Amerindian languages in Leiden, 2000, pp. 329–44. (Indigenous Languages of Latin America 3). Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian studies.Google Scholar