Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-24T23:17:13.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction: Linguistic Typology – Setting the Scene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2017

By
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald  and
R. M. W. Dixon
Edited by
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald  and
R. M. W. Dixon
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
Affiliation:
James Cook University, North Queensland
R. M. W. Dixon
Affiliation:
James Cook University, North Queensland
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology , pp. 1 - 36
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1977. Tarma Quechua: Grammar, texts, dictionary. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Willem F. H. 2013. A Quechuan mirative? In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Storch, Anne (eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture, pp. 95–110. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Adelaar, Willem F. H. with Muysken, Pieter. 2004. The languages of the Andes. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2006. Serial verb constructions in a typological perspective. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 1–87. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2007. Typological dimensions in word formation. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III, pp. 1–65. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16(3): 435–85.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2014. The grammar of knowledge in typological perspective. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 1–51. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2015. The art of grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (ed.). Forthcoming. The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W.. 1998. Evidentials and areal typology: A case study from Amazonia. Language Sciences: Areal typology (special issue, ed. Ramat, Paulo) 20: 241–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazell, C. E. 1958. Linguistic typology. An inaugural lecture delivered on 26 February 1958. School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent and Kay, Paul. 1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. and Slobin, Dan I.. 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2008. Austronesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2011. Sivisa Titan: Sketch grammar, texts, vacabulary based on material collected by P. Josef Meier and Po Minis. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Bright, William. 2007. Review of The world atlas of language structures, edited by Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard. International Journal of American Linguistics 73: 241–54.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Keith and Ogilvie, Sarah (eds.). 2009. Concise encyclopedia of languages of the world. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Chacon, Thiago. 2012. The phonology and morphology of Kubeo: The documentation, theory, and description of an Amazonian language. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai‘i, Manoa.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1988. Linguistic typology. Annual Review of Anthropology 17: 145–59.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology, 2nd revised edn. Oxford: Blackwell and University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1990. Holistic versus partial typologies. In Bahner, Werner, Schildt, Joachim and Viehweger, Dieter (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Congress of Linguists, Vol. I, pp. 139–48. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1993. Typology and reconstruction. In Jones, Charles (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, pp. 74–97. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2001. Different views of language typology. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf and Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, Vol. I, pp. 24–39. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1979. The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15: 203–24.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2011. Implicational hierarchies. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, pp. 190–205. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2011. Language universals and linguistic knowledge. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, pp. 227–79. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daniel, Michael. 2011. Linguistic typology and the study of language. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, pp. 43–68. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16: 529–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax. Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. Adjective classes in typological perspective. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Adjective classes: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 1–49. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2010a. Basic linguistic theory, Vol. I: Methodology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2010b. Basic linguistic theory, Vol. II: Grammatical topics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory, Vol. III: Further grammatical topics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. 1997. A typology of argument-determined constructions. In Bybee, Joan L., Haiman, John and Thompson, Sandra (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, pp. 71–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dozon, A. 1879. Manuel de la langue chkipe ou albanaise. Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 2007. Word order. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. I: Clause structure, pp. 61–131. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 2013. A grammatical description of Kara-Lemakot. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Duponceau, Peter S. 1819. Report of the Corresponding Secretary to the committee of his progress in the investigation committed to him of the General Character and Forms of the Languages of the American Indians – Read, 12th Jan, 1819. In Transactions of the Historical and Literary Committee of the American Philosophical Society, held at Philadelphia, for promoting useful knowledge, Vol. I, pp. xvii–xlvi. Philadelphia: Abraham Small.Google Scholar
Durie, Mark. 1985. A grammar of Acehnese: On the basis of a dialect of North Aceh. (Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde). Amsterdam: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Durie, Mark. 1988. The so-called passive of Acehnese. Language 61: 104–13.Google Scholar
Eades, Diana. 1979. Gumbaynggirr. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, Barry J. (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages, Vol. I, pp. 245–361. Canberra: Australian National University Press; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas and Levinson, Stephen C.. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429–92.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1998. Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael. Forthcoming. Polysynthesis. In Evans, Nicholas, Fortescue, Michael and Mithun, Marianne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2003. Evidentiality in the Balkans with special attention to Macedonian and Albanian. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, pp. 189–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2012. Perhaps mirativity is phlogiston, but admirativity is perfect: On Balkan evidential strategies. Linguistic Typology 16: 505–27.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of language, pp. 58–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Language Universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. (Janua linguarum, Series Minor, 59). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1972. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis type. Working Papers in Language Universals; repr. in Greenberg 1990 (pp. 16–93).Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1974. Language typology: A historical and analytic overview. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1990. On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, ed. Denning, K. and Kemmer, S.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haase, Martin. 2001a. Sprachtypologie bei Edward Sapir. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf and Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, Vol. I, pp. 264–6. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haase, Martin. 2001b. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung bei Joseph H. Greenberg. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf and Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, Vol. I, pp. 280–3. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2001. Parametrisierung in der generativen Grammatik. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf and Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, Vol. I, pp. 283–93. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Forkel, Robert, Haspelmath, Martin and Bank, Sebastian (eds.). 2015. Glottolog 2.5. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard (eds.). 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haude, Katarina. 2010. ‘She kisses her late husband’ = ‘She kissed her husband’: nominal tense in Movima. In Wohlgemuth, Jan and Cysouw, Michael (eds.), Rara and rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity, pp. 95–116. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 2001. The role of processing principles in explaining language universals. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf and Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, Vol. I, pp. 360–9. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2001. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B. G. 1979. Abkhaz. (Lingua Descriptive Studies 2). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans H. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans H. 2010. Typology and universals. In Luraghi, Silvia and Bubenik, Vit (eds.), Bloomsbury companion to historical linguistics, pp. 59–69. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. Principles of grammaticization: Towards a diachronic typology. In Lehmann, W. P. (ed.), Language typology 1987: Systematic balance in language – Papers from the Linguistic Typology Symposium, Berkeley, 1–3 December 1987, pp. 167–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1836. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Jensen, Cheryl. 1999. Tupí-Guaraní. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages, pp. 125–64. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul and McDaniel, Chad K.. 1978. The linguistic significance of the meanings of basic color terms. Language 54: 610–46.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul, Berlin, Brent and Merrifield, William R.. 1991. Biocultural implications of color naming. Journal of Linguistic Anthopology 1: 12–25.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul, Berlin, Brent, Maffi, Luisa, Merrifield, William R. and Cook, Richard, 2009. World color survey. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 2003. Typology and universals. In Frawley, William J. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 2nd edn, pp. 310–15. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kibrik, A. E. 1977. Opyt strukturnogo opisanija archinskogo jazuka. Tom II. Taksonomicheskaja grammatika [An essay in structural description of Archi. Volume II. Taksonomic grammar]. Moscow: Izdateljstvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Kibrik, A. E. 1994. Archi. In Smeets, Rieks (ed.), The indigenous languages of the Caucasus, Part 2, pp. 297–365. New York: Caravan Books.Google Scholar
König, Christa. 2013. Source of information and unexpected information in !Xun: evidential, mirative and counterexpectation markers. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Storch, Anne (eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture, pp. 65–84. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania. 1998. On identifying an evasive gram: Action narrowly averted. Studies in Language 22: 113–60.Google Scholar
Lawler, John M. 1988. On the questions of Acenhese ‘passive’. Language 64: 114–17.Google Scholar
Loughnane, Robyn. 2003. Reported speech in Golin (a Papuan language of New Guinea). BA Honours thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Loughnane, Robyn. 2005. Reported speech constructions in Golin. In Evans, Nicholas, Besold, Jutta, Stoakes, Hywel and Lee, Alan (eds.), Materials on Golin: Grammar, texts and dictionary, pp. 132–51. Department of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Graham and Blake, Barry J.. 1981. Language typology: Cross-linguistic studies in syntax. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. 2007. Concise dictionary of linguistics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1926. Linguistique historique et linguistique génerale. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 2003. A semantic analysis of associative plurals. Studies in Language 27: 469–503.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 2011. Explaining linguistic universals. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, pp. 69–89. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, A. 1975. Language classification in the nineteenth century. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics, Vol. 13: Historiography of linguistics, pp. 606–716. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, A. 1997. The history of linguistics, Vol. IV: Nineteenth-century linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Morse, Nancy L. and Maxwell, Michael B.. 1999. Cubeo grammar. Studies in the languages of Colombia 5. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62: 56–119.Google Scholar
Nomoto, Hiroki. 2013. Number in classifier languages. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel and Sadler, Louisa. 2004. Nominal tense in cross-linguistic perspective. Language 80: 776–806.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1975. Phonetic explanations for nasal sound patterns. In Ferguson, C. A., Hyman, L. M. and Ohala, J. J. (eds.), Nasalfest: Papers from a symposium on nasals and nasalization, pp. 289–316. Stanford: Language Universals Project.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. 2009. WALS values evaluated. Linguistic Typology 13: 51–76.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans and Schellinger, Wolfgang. 1997. The uneven distribution of genders over numbers: Greenberg Nos. 37 and 45. Linguistic Typology 1: 53–101.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paulo (ed.). 1998. Areal typology. Special issue of Language Sciences 20(3).Google Scholar
Ramat, Paulo 2011. The (early) history of linguistic typology. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, pp. 9–24. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm. 1818. Observations sur la langue et la litérature provençales. Paris: Librairie grecque-latine-allemande.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. 1808. Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier. Heidelberg: Mohr und Zimmer.Google Scholar
Schleicher, August. 1859. Zur Morfologie der Sprache. Mémoires de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Petersbourg, ser 4, 1(7): 1–38.Google Scholar
Schultze, Wolfgang M. 2007. Review of The world atlas of language structures, edited by Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David and Comrie, Bernard. Studies in Language 31: 445–63.Google Scholar
Siewerska, Anna. 1984. The passive: A comparative linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, pp. 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Smith-Stark, T. Cedric. 1974. The plurality split. Papers from the Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 10: 657–71.Google Scholar
Smythe, W. E. 1948/9. Elementary grammar of the Gumbaiŋgar language (north coast, N. S. W.). (Oceania Monograph 8). Sydney: Australian National Research Council.Google Scholar
Storch, Anne. 2013. Knowing, smelling and telling tales in Luwo. In Aikenvald, Alexandra Y. and Storch, Anne (eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture, pp. 47–68. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tida, Syuntarô. 2006. A grammar of the Dom language, a Papuan language of Papua New Guinea. PhD thesis, University of Kyoto.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith. 2007. Nominal tense? The meaning of Guaraní nominal temporal markers. Language 83: 831–69.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith 2008. Defining cross-linguistic categories: The case of nominal tense. Reply to Nordlinger and Sadler (2008). Language 84: 332–42.Google Scholar
Uusküla, Mari and Urmas, Sutrop. 2010. The puzzle of two terms for red in Hungarian. In Wohlgemuth, Jan and Cysouw, Michael (eds.), Rara and rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity, pp. 359–76. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1974. Theoretical word order studies: Results and problems. Papiere zur Linguistik 7: 5–25.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004. Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Language 80: 7–39.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×