Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T06:09:02.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - Conceptions of L2 Learning in Critical Language Pedagogy

from Part V - Pedagogical Interventions and Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2019

By
Graham Crookes
Edited by
John W. Schwieter  and
Alessandro Benati
John W. Schwieter
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Alessandro Benati
Affiliation:
American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Get access

Summary

A view of second language instruction that takes social justice as both major focus and aim is now quite familiar in the field of applied linguistics. Over fifty years of publishing (on a small scale, with only scattered reports of individual efforts), the area has paid little attention to mainstream psychological learning theory nor to conventional second language acquisition (SLA) theory. Its own publications have drawn on educational theory, curriculum theory, social theory (not to mention political philosophy), first language (L1) literacy instructional practices (composition and rhetoric), critical discourse analysis, and the pedagogy of adult education, among other areas and fields. It has been a stimulus to the broader development of critical applied linguistics. Its most immediate conceptual neighbour in applied linguistics, perhaps, is second language (L2) work on learner autonomy, though with little acknowledgement. This literature contains both broad-brush and narrower descriptions of what is or should be going on in critical (language) pedagogy classrooms, as well as more theoretical discussions concerning their intent.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning , pp. 621 - 646
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassi, J. (1964). The nature of scientific problems and their roots in metaphysics. In Bunge, M. (ed.), The critical approach to science and philosophy (pp. 189–211). New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. (ed.) (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, E. R. (1992). Making meaning, making change. McHenry, IL: Delta Systems.Google Scholar
Benesch, S. (2017). Emotions and English language teaching: Exploring teachers’ emotion labor. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2014). Social class in applied linguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bloor, M., & Bloor, T. (2013). The practice of critical discourse analysis: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (2002). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Breen, M. P., & Littlejohn, A. (2000). Classroom decision-making: Negotiation and process syllabuses in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brenner, D. (2012). On critical pedagogy and foreign language/culture education. In Levine, G. S. & Phipps, A. (eds.), Critical and intercultural theory and language pedagogy (pp. 125–140). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. (1997). How applied linguistics is the same as any other science. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 86–94.Google Scholar
Bunge, M. (1998). Philosophy of science (Vol. 1). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary conditions. Organi-zational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, X. (2016). Community service learning as critical curriculum: Promoting international students’ second language practices. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 13(4), 289–318.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (2002). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, J. L. (1987). Curriculum renewal in school foreign language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, L. (1978). Paulo Freire’s philosophy: Derivation of curriculum principles and their application to second language curriculum design. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Crawford-Lange, L. M. (1981). Redirecting second language curricula: Paulo Freire’s contribution. Foreign Language Annals, 14(4 & 5), 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crookes, G. V. (2011). Values, philosophies, and beliefs in TESOL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crookes, G. V. (2013). Critical ELT in action. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Darder, A. (2015). Freire and education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Diemer, M. A., Rapa, L. J., Park, C. J., & Perry, J. C. (2017). Development and validation of the Critical Consciousness Scale. Youth & Society, 49(4), 461–483.Google Scholar
Duncan-Andrade, J. M. R., & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a test bench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In Lave, J. & Chaiklin, S. (eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, B. (1987). Critical social science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1973). Social philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Foley, R. (1999). Analysis. In Audi, Robert (ed.), The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (2nd edn., p. 25). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984). What is Enlightenment? In Rabinow, P. (ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 32–50). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2005). The order of things. New York, NY: Routledge. [Original work published in English in 1970]Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2008) Introduction to Kant’s Anthropology (ed. Nigro, Roberto, trans. R. Nigro & K. Briggs). Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e). [Original work published in French in 1964]Google Scholar
Freebody, P., & Luke, A. (1990). Literacies programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect: Australian Journal of TESOL, 5(7), 7–16.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. London: Continuum/Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Fridland, E., & Strasser, A. (2012). Philosophy of learning. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 2615–2621). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Gore, J. M. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (2002). Applied linguistics: An emerging discipline for the 21st century. In Kaplan, R. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 3–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests (trans J. J. Shapiro). Boston, MA: Beacon. [originally published in German, 1968: Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp]Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1985). The philosophies of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holzkamp, K. (2013). Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (trans. A. Boreham, eds. Schraube, E. & Osterkamp, U.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. (1937/1972). Traditional and critical theory. In Horkheimer, M., Critical theory: Selected essays. New York: Herder & Herder.Google Scholar
Huh, S. (2016). Instructional model of critical literacy in an EFL context: Balancing conventional and critical literacy. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 13(3), 210–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1899/1983). Talks to teachers on psychology and to students on some of life’s ideals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, L. G. (1969). 25 centuries of language teaching: An inquiry into the science, art, and development of language teaching methodology, 500 bc–1969. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
Khatib, M., & Miri, M. (2016). Cultivating multivocality in language classrooms: Contribution of critical pedagogy-informed teacher education. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 13(2), 98–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, R., & Miller, E. R. (2017). Re-examining and re-envisioning criticality in language studies: Theory and praxis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 15, 1–29.Google Scholar
Kumaravadivelu, K. (2001). Towards a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537–560.Google Scholar
Lankshear, C. (1994). Afterword: Reclaiming empowerment and rethinking the past. In Escobar, M., Fernandez, A. L., Guevara-Niefla, G., & Freire, P. (eds.), Paulo Freire on higher education (pp. 161–185). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Lau, S. M. C., Juby-Smith, B., & Desbiens, I. (2017). Translanguaging for transgressive praxis: Promoting critical literacy in a multiage bilingual classroom. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(1), 99–127.Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, B. (2001). Rethinking assessment from a critical perspective. Language Testing, 18(4), 351–372.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1859/1978). Marx on the history of his opinions. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), The Marx–Engels reader (pp. 3–10). Original work published as A contribution to the critique of political economy; Preface.Google Scholar
McKinley, J. (2015). Critical argument and writer identity: Social constructivism as a theoretical framework for EFL academic writing. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 12(3), 161–230.Google Scholar
Megyes, P., & Nikolov, M. (2002). Curriculum development in foreign language education: The interface between political and professional decisions. In Kaplan, R. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 263–274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, E. R. (2012). Performativity theory and language learning: Sedimentating, appropriating, and constituting language and subjectivity. Linguistics and Education, 23, 88–99.Google Scholar
Morrow, R. A., & Brown, D. D. (1994). Contemporary social theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Olssen, M. (2003). Foucault and critique: Kant, humanism and the human sciences. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, 11–13 September. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00003388.htm.Google Scholar
Olssen, M. (2006). Foucault and critical theory. In Olssen, M., Michel Foucault: Materialism and education (pp. 121–151). London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Ortactepe, D. (2013). “This is called free-falling theory not culture shock!” A narrative inquiry on second language socialization. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 12(4), 215–229.Google Scholar
Oskarsson, M. (1978). Approaches to self-assessment in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Panofsky, C. P. (2003). The relations of learning and student social class. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., & Miller, S. (eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 411–431). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, B. N. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1990). Towards a critical applied linguistics for the 1990s. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1996). TESOL and critical literacies: Modern, post, or neo? TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 329–348.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Price, S. (1999). Critical discourse analysis: Discourse acquisition and discourse practices. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 581–595.Google Scholar
Prilleltensky, I., & Nelson, G. (2002). Doing psychology critically: Making difference in diverse settings. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ratner, C. (2000). Outline of a coherent, comprehensive concept of culture. Cross-Cultural Psychology Bulletin, 34(1–2), 5–11.Google Scholar
Reagan, T. G., & Osborn, T. A. (2002). The foreign language educator in society: Toward a critical pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocs.Google Scholar
Sawchuk, P. H., & Stetsenko, A. (2008). Sociological understandings of conduct for a noncanonical activity theory: Exploring intersections and complementarities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15, 339–360.Google Scholar
Schraube, E. (2000). Reflecting on who we are in a technological world. In Sloan, T. (ed.), Critical psychology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the use of language tests. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Shor, I. (1980). Critical teaching and everyday life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shor, I. (1996). When students have power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. M. (2016). Supporting critical literacy in high school English by using systemic functional linguistics to analyze fantasy, canonical, and nonfiction texts. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 13(3), 183–209.Google Scholar
Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2004). Cultural historical activity theory and the object of innovation. In van Esch, K. & St. John, O. (eds.), New insights into foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 51–68). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2005). Epistemology, politics, and ethics in sociocultural theory. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 393–409.Google Scholar
Tolman, C. W. (1994). Psychology, society, and subjectivity: An introduction to German critical psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tolman, J. (2006). Learning, unlearning, and the teaching of writing: Educational turns in postcoloniality. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 3(2&3), 189–200.Google Scholar
Toohey, K., & Norton, B. (2003). Learner autonomy as agency in sociocultural settings. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 58–74). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1988). Lev Vygotsky and Pierre Janet: On the origin of the concept of sociogenesis. Developmental Review, 8, 52–65.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, F. A., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1926/1997). Educational psychology (trans. R. Silverman). Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (eds. and trans. Hanfmann, E. & Vakar, G.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In Wertsch, J. V. (ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, N. (1983). Language and culture in conflict: Problem-posing in the ESL classroom. New York: AddisonWesley.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, G. (2013). Language teaching through the ages. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winch, C. (1998). The philosophy of human learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winther, R. G. (2016). The structure of scientific theories. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/structure-scientific-theories/.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×