Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T21:33:47.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Historiometric Methods

from Part IV - Methods for Studying the Acquisition and Maintenance of Expertise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2018

By
Dean Keith Simonton
Edited by
K. Anders Ericsson ,
Robert R. Hoffman ,
Aaron Kozbelt  and
A. Mark Williams
K. Anders Ericsson
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Robert R. Hoffman
Affiliation:
Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Aaron Kozbelt
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
A. Mark Williams
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance , pp. 310 - 328
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowerman, W. G. (1947). Studies in genius. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Bramwell, B. S. (1948). Galton’s “Hereditary Genius” and the three following generations since 1869. Eugenics Review, 39, 146–153.Google Scholar
Candolle, A. (1873). Histoire des sciences et des savants depuis deux siècles. Geneva: Georg.Google Scholar
Cassandro, V. J. (1998). Explaining premature mortality across fields of creative endeavor. Journal of Personality, 66, 805–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, J. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 359–377.Google Scholar
Charness, N., & Gerchak, Y. (1996). Participation rates and maximal performance: A log-linear explanation for group differences, such as Russian and male dominance in chess. Psychological Science, 7, 46–51.Google Scholar
Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2014). Diversifying experiences in the development of genius and their impact on creative cognition. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 375–393). Chichester: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2015). Psychopathology, adversity, and creativity: Diversifying experiences in the development of eminent African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 623–636.Google Scholar
Dennis, W. (1966). Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 1–8.Google Scholar
Ellis, H. (1926). A study of British genius (rev. edn.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Elo, A. E. (1965). Age changes in master chess performance. Journal of Gerontology, 20, 289–299.Google Scholar
Elo, A. E. (1986). The rating of chessplayers, past and present (2nd edn.). New York: Arco.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Creative genius: A view from the expert-performance approach. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 321–349). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2014). Psychometric studies of scientific talent and eminence. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 62–86). Chichester: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. (1865). Hereditary talent and character. Macmillan’s Magazine, 12, 157–166, 318–327.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. Z., Macnamara, B. N., Campitelli, G., Ullén, F., & Mosing, M. A. (2016). Beyond born versus made: A new look at expertise. In Ross, B. H. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 64, pp. 1–55). Oxford: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hass, R. W., & Weisberg, R. W. (2015). Revisiting the 10-year rule for composers from the Great American Songbook: On the validity of two measures of creative production. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd edn.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jones, B. F., Reedy, E. J., & Weinberg, B. A. (2014). Age and scientific genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 422–450). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Karlson, J. I. (1970). Genetic association of giftedness and creativity with schizophrenia. Hereditas, 66, 177–182.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 114–124.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2005). Factors affecting aesthetic success and improvement in creativity: A case study of musical genres in Mozart. Psychology of Music, 33, 235–255.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2008). Longitudinal hit ratios of classical composers: Reconciling “Darwinian” and expertise acquisition perspectives on lifespan creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 221–235.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2014). Musical creativity over the lifespan. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 451–472). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. (1944). Configurations of culture growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kyaga, S. (2015). Creativity and mental illness: The mad genius in question. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lehman, H. C. (1946). Age of starting to contribute versus total creative output. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 460–480.Google Scholar
Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Manniche, E., & Falk, G. (1957). Age and the Nobel Prize. Behavioral Science, 2, 301–307.Google Scholar
McKay, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Literary geniuses: Their life, work, and death. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 473–487). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Nakamura, J., & Fajans, J. (2014). Interviewing highly eminent creators. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 33–61). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (1992). The learning curve for writing books: Evidence from Professor Asimov. Psychological Science, 3, 380–382.Google Scholar
Oleszek, W. (1969). Age and political careers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 100–103.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A., Holden, J., & Neustadter, D. (2008). The criterion problem and creativity in film: Psychometric characteristics of various measures. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 190–196.Google Scholar
Quételet, A. (1968). A treatise on man and the development of his faculties. New York: Franklin. (Reprint of 1842 Edinburgh translation of 1835 French original)Google Scholar
Raskin, E. A. (1936). Comparison of scientific and literary ability: A biographical study of eminent scientists and men of letters of the nineteenth century. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31, 20–35.Google Scholar
Root-Bernstein, R., Allen, L., Beach, L. Bhadula, R., Fast, J., Hosey, C., … & Weinlander, S. (2008). Arts foster scientific success: Avocations of Nobel, National Academy, Royal Society, and Sigma Xi members. Journal of the Psychology of Science and Technology, 1, 51–63.Google Scholar
Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1993). Identification of scientists making long-term, high-impact contributions, with notes on their methods of working. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, W. T. (2014). The psychobiography of genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 20–32). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Schulz, R., & Curnow, C. (1988). Peak performance and age among super athletes: Track and field, swimming, baseball, tennis, and golf. Journal of Gerontology, 43, 113–120.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1975a). Age and literary creativity: A cross-cultural and transhistorical survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 259–277.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1975b). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119–1133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (1976a). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1976b). Philosophical eminence, beliefs, and zeitgeist: An individual-generational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 630–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1977a). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791–804.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1977b). Eminence, creativity, and geographic marginality: A recursive structural equation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 805–816.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1979). Was Napoleon a military genius? Score: Carlyle 1, Tolstoy 1. Psychological Reports, 44, 21–22.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1980). Land battles, generals, and armies: Individual and situational determinants of victory and casualties. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 110–119.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1983). Intergenerational transfer of individual differences in hereditary monarchs: Genetic, role-modeling, cohort, or sociocultural effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 354–364.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984a). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273–1286.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984b). Creative productivity and age: A mathematical model based on a two-step cognitive process. Developmental Review, 4, 77–111.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984c). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984d). Leader age and national condition: A longitudinal analysis of 25 European monarchs. Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 111–114.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1985). Quality, quantity, and age: The careers of 10 distinguished psychologists. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 21, 241–254.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1986a). Biographical typicality, eminence, and achievement style. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 14–22.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1986b). Popularity, content, and context in 37 Shakespeare plays. Poetics, 15, 493–510.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1987a). Developmental antecedents of achieved eminence. Annals of Child Development, 5, 131–169.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1987b). Musical aesthetics and creativity in Beethoven: A computer analysis of 105 compositions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 5, 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1988a). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251–267.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1988b). Galtonian genius, Kroeberian configurations, and emulation: A generational time-series analysis of Chinese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1989). Age and creative productivity: Nonlinear estimation of an information-processing model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 29, 23–37.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1990). Psychology, science, and history: An introduction to historiometry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991a). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 27, 119–130.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991b). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829–840.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1991c). Latent-variable models of posthumous reputation: A quest for Galton’s G. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 607–619.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1992a). Gender and genius in Japan: Feminine eminence in masculine culture. Sex Roles, 27, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1992b). Leaders of American psychology, 1879–1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 5–17.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1992c). The social context of career success and course for 2,026 scientists and inventors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 452–463.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1995). Drawing inferences from symphonic programs: Musical attributes versus listener attributions. Music Perception, 12, 307–322.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1996a). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In Ericsson, K. A. (ed.), The road to expert performance: Empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 227–253). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1996b). Individual genius and cultural configurations: The case of Japanese civilization. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 354–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1998). Political leadership across the life span: Chronological versus career age in the British monarchy. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 195–206.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4, 425–451.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106, 435–457.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283–318.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2003a). Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations: Strategies and results. In Paulus, P. B. & Nijstad, B. A. (eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 304–328). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2003b). Qualitative and quantitative analyses of historical data. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 617–640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (2004a). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2004b). Group artistic creativity: Creative clusters and cinematic success in 1,327 feature films. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1494–1520.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2007). Cinema composers: Career trajectories for creative productivity in film music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 160–169.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2008a). Childhood giftedness and adulthood genius: A historiometric analysis of 291 eminent African Americans. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 243–255.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2008b). Gender differences in birth order and family size among 186 eminent psychologists. Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology, 1, 15–22.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156–179.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Creative productivity and aging: An age decrement – or not? In Whitbourne, S. K. & Sliwinski, M. (eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of adult development and aging (pp. 477–496). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2013). Presidential leadership. In Rumsey, M. G. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership (pp. 327–342). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014a). Creative performance, expertise acquisition, individual-differences, and developmental antecedents: An integrative research agenda. Intelligence, 45, 66–73.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014b). Historiometric studies of genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 87–106). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014c). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2015a). Historiometry. In Martin, J., Sugarman, J., & Slaney, K. (eds.), Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology (pp. 183–199). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2015b). Numerical odds and evens in Beethoven’s nine symphonies: Can a computer really tell the difference? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 33, 18–35.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2015c). Thomas Alva Edison’s creative career: The multilayered trajectory of trials, errors, failures, and triumphs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 2–14.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2016). Early and late bloomers among classical composers: Were the greatest geniuses also prodigies? In McPherson, G. (ed.), Musical prodigies: Interpretations from psychology, music education, musicology and ethnomusicology (pp. 185–197). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K., & Song, A. V. (2009). Eminence, IQ, physical and mental health, and achievement domain: Cox’s 282 geniuses revisited. Psychological Science, 20, 429–434.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K., & Ting, S.-S. (2010). Creativity in Eastern and Western civilizations: The lessons of historiometry. Management and Organization Review, 6, 329–350.Google Scholar
Stephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1993). Age and the Nobel Prize revisited. Scientometrics, 28, 387–399.Google Scholar
Stroebe, W. (2010). The graying of academia: Will it reduce scientific productivity? American Psychologist, 65, 660–673.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Sulloway, F. J., & Zweigenhaft, R. L. (2010). Birth order and risk taking in athletics: A meta-analysis and study of major league baseball players. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 402–416.Google Scholar
Terman, L. M. (1925–59). Genetic studies of genius, 5 vols. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wai, J. (2014). Investigating the world‘s rich and powerful: Education, cognitive ability, and sex differences. Intelligence, 46, 54–72.Google Scholar
Wai, J., & Rindermann, H. (2015). The path and performance of a company leader: An historical examination of the education and cognitive ability of Fortune 500 CEOs. Intelligence, 53, 102–107.Google Scholar
Walberg, H. J., Rasher, S. P., & Parkerson, J. (1980). Childhood and eminence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 13, 225–231.Google Scholar
Whipple, E. M. (2004). Eminence revisited. History of Psychology, 7, 265–296.Google Scholar
White, R. K. (1931). The versatility of genius. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 460–489.Google Scholar
Woods, F. A. (1906). Mental and moral heredity in royalty. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Woods, F. A. (1909). A new name for a new science. Science, 30, 703–704.Google Scholar
Woods, F. A. (1911). Historiometry as an exact science. Science, 33, 568–574.Google Scholar
Woods, F. A. (1913). The influence of monarchs. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Yuasa, M. (1974). The shifting center of scientific activity in the West: From the sixteenth to the twentieth century. In. Shigeru, N., Swain, D. L., & Eri, Y. (eds.), Science and society in modern Japan (pp. 81–103). University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Zickar, M. J, & Slaughter, J. E. (1999). Examining creative performance over time using hierarchical linear modeling: An illustration using film directors. Human Performance, 12, 211–230.Google Scholar
Zusne, L. (1976). Age and achievement in psychology: The harmonic mean as a model. American Psychologist, 31, 805–807.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×