Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- An Introduction to the Second Edition
- Part I An Introduction to Creativity
- Part II Underpinnings of Creativity
- Part III Differential Bases for Creativity
- Part IV Creativity in the World
- Index
- References
Part I - An Introduction to Creativity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2019
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- An Introduction to the Second Edition
- Part I An Introduction to Creativity
- Part II Underpinnings of Creativity
- Part III Differential Bases for Creativity
- Part IV Creativity in the World
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity , pp. 5 - 104Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Agars, M. D., Kaufman, J. C., & Locke, T. R. (2008). Social influence and creativity in organizations: A multilevel lens for theory, research, and practice. In Mumford, M. D., Hunter, S. T., & Bedell-Avers, K. E. (eds.), Multi-level issues in organizational innovation (Multi-level issues series) (pp. 3–62). Amsterdam: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1929/1973). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (2nd edn, trans. R. W. Rotsel). Ann Arbor, MI: Ardis.Google Scholar
Barron, F. (1963). Creativity and psychological health. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (2014). A socio-historical overview of the creativity–pathology connection: From antiquity to contemporary times. In Kaufman, J. C. (ed.), Creativity and mental illness (pp. 3–24). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, H. S. (2008). Art Worlds. Updated and expended. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Becker, M. (1995). Nineteenth century foundations of creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Intellectual estuaries: Connecting learning and creativity in programs of advanced academics. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 296–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Fundamentals of creativity. Educational Leadership, 70, 10–15.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chassell, L. M. (1916). Test for originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapp, E. P. (2016). Participatory creativity: Introducing access and equity to the creative classroom. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cropley, D. H. (2015). Creativity in engineering: Novel solutions to complex problems. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cropley, D. H. & Cropley, A. J. (2010). Functional creativity: “Products” and the generation of effective novelty. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 301–317). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. (ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dacey, J. (1999). Concepts of creativity: A history. In Runco, M. & Pritzker, S. (eds.), Encyclopaedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 309–322). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Davids, K. & De Munck, B. (eds.). (2016). Innovation and creativity in late medieval and early modern European cities. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Saint-Laurent, C. (2015). Dialogue and debate in psychology: Commentary on the foundational myth of psychology as a science. In Cresswell, J., Haye, A., Larrain, A., Morgan, M., & Sullivan, G. (eds.), Dialogue and debate in the making of theoretical psychology (pp. 231–239). Ontario: Captus.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). From dichotomous to relational thinking in the psychology of creativity: A review of great debates. Creativity and Leisure: An Intercultural and Cross-disciplinary Journal, 1(2), 83–96.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2016). The psychology of creating: A cultural-developmental approach to key dichotomies within creativity studies. In Glăveanu, V. P. (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research (pp. 205–224). London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2017a). From fantasy and imagination to creativity: Towards both a “psychology with soul” and a “psychology with others.” In Wagoner, B., Bresco, I., & Awad, S. H. (eds.), The psychology of imagination: History, theory and new research horizons (pp. 175–189). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2017b). Creativity in perspective: A sociocultural and critical account. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 1–12. Online first.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2017c). Creativity in craft. In Kaufman, J. C., Glăveanu, V. P., & Baer, J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity in different domains (pp. 616–632). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (ed.) (2019). The creativity reader. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. & Sierra, Z. (2015). Creativity and epistemologies of the South. Culture & Psychology, 21(3), 340–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanchett Hanson, M. (2015). Worldmaking: Psychology and the ideology of creativity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (ed.) (2014). Creativity and mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2016b). Creativity and mental illness: So many studies, so many wrong conclusions. In Plucker, J. A. (ed.), Creativity and innovation: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 199–204). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (2002). Could Steven Spielberg manage the Yankees?: Creative thinking in different domains. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 12, 5–15.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds). (2006). The international handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, K. (2009). History of creativity. In Kerr, B. (ed.), Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity, and talent (pp. 425–427). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J. H. (2003). The value of creativity: The origins and emergence of a modern belief. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1968). The Remote Associates Test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 213–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montuori, A. (2003). The complexity of improvisation and the improvisation of complexity: Social science, art and creativity. Human Relations, 56, 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro, C. (2015). Material culture: Still “Terra Incognita” for psychology today? Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 172–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Negus, K. & Pickering, M. (2004). Creativity, communication and cultural value. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C. (2010). The invention of creativity: The emergence of a discourse. Cultural Studies Review, 16(2), 49–74.Google Scholar
Ng, A. K. (2001). Why Asians are less creative than westerners. Singapore: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Niu, W. & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Creativity of Chinese and American people: A synthetic analysis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2017). The invention of creativity: Modern society and the culture of the new. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. & Albert, R. S. (2010). Creativity research: A historical view. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 3–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A., Hyeon Paek, S., & Jaeger, G. (2015). Is creativity being supported? Further analyses of grants and awards for creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlesinger, J. (2009). Creative mythconceptions: A closer look at the evidence for “mad genius” hypothesis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, J. (2012). The insanity hoax: Exposing the myth of the mad genius. New York: Shrinktunes Media.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Creativity and mental illness. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 381–394). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2001). The psychology of creativity: A historical perspective. Davis, CA: Green College Lecture Series on The Nature of Creativity: History Biology, and Socio-Cultural Dimensions. University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations: Strategies and results. In Paulus, P. and Nijstad, B. (eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 304–325). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2011). Creativity and discovery as blind variation and selective retention: Multiple-variant definitions and blind-sighted integration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 222–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014a). The mad-genius paradox: Can creative people be more mentally healthy but highly creative people more mentally ill? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 470–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonton, D. K. (2014b). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(1), 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). The propulsion model of creative contributions applied to the arts and letters. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Pretz, J. E., & Kaufman, J. C. (2003). Types of innovations. In Shavinina, L. (ed.), The international handbook of innovation (pp. 158–169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (2008). The Torrance tests of creative thinking norms-technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1930/2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, R. P. (2000). Creativity and beyond: Cultures, values, and change. New York: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yahn, L. & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Asking the wrong question: Why shouldn’t people dislike creativity? In Ambrose, D. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), Creative intelligence in the 21st century (pp. 75–88). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In Cummings, B. S. (ed.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. (2011). Why grand theories of creativity distort, distract, and disappoint. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 21, 73–100.Google Scholar
Baer, J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). The Amusement Park Theoretical model of creativity: An attempt to bridge the domain specificity/generality gap. In Kaufman, J. C., Glăveanu, V. P., & Baer, J. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity across different domains (pp. 8–17). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barron, F. (1999). All creation is a collaboration. In Montuori, A. & Purser, R. (eds.), Social creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 49–59). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15, 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 13–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Fundamentals of creativity. Educational Leadership, 70, 10–15.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Theories of creativity. In Plucker, J. A. (ed.), Creativity and innovation: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 35–48). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botella, M., Glăveanu, V. P., Zenasni, F., Storme, M., Myszkowski, N., Wolff, M., & Lubart, T. (2013). How artists create: Creative process and multivariate factors. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1962). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cropley, A. J. & Cropley, D. (2009). Fostering creativity: A diagnostic approach for higher education and organizations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Baas, M. (2011). Group creativity and innovation: A motivated information processing perspective. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. & Ryan, R. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durmysheva, Y. & Kozbelt, A. (2010). The creative approach questionnaire: Operationalizing Galenson’s finder-seeker typology in a non-expert sample. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 20, 35–55.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. Roring, R. W., & Nandagopal, K. (2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert-performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18, 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubanks, D. L., Palanski, M. E., Swart, J., Hammond, M. M., & Oguntebi, J. (2016). Creativity in early and established career: Insights into multi‐level drivers from Nobel Prize winners. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50, 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Forgeard, M. J. C. & Mecklenburg, A. C. (2013). The two dimensions of motivation and a reciprocal model of the creative process. Review of General Psychology, 17, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galenson, D. W. (2005). Old masters and young geniuses: The two life cycles of artistic creativity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Galenson, D. W. (2009). Old masters and young geniuses: The two life cycles of human creativity. Journal of Applied Economics, 12, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangadharbatla, H. (2010). Technology component: A modified systems approach to creative thought. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (2006). Five minds for the future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Gilson, L. L. & Madjar, N. (2011). Radical and incremental creativity: Antecedents and processes. The Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). How are we creative together? Comparing sociocognitive and sociocultural answers. Theory and Psychology, 21, 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015a). Theory and context / Theory in context: Towards an expanded view of the creativity field. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 268–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015b). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49, 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015c). Developing society: Reflections on the notion of societal creativity. In Tan, A. G. & Perleth, C. (eds.), Creativity, culture, and development (pp. 183–200). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (ed.) (2019). The creativity reader. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. & Kaufman, J. C. (in preparation). The creativity matrix: Spotlights and blind spots in our understanding of the phenomenon.Google Scholar
Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, H. E. & Wallace, D. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John-Steiner, V. (1992). Creative lives, creative tensions. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karwowski, M. (2011). Teachers’ personality and perception of the climate for creativity in a school. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 21, 37–52.Google Scholar
Karwowski, M., Kaufman, J. C., Lebuda, I., Szumski, G., & Firkowska-Mankiewicz, A. (2017). Intelligence in childhood and creative achievements in middle-age: The necessary condition approach. Intelligence, 64, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karwowski, M. & Lebuda, I. (2013). Extending climato-economic theory: When, how, and why it explains differences in nations’ creativity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 493–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Using creativity to reduce ethnic bias in college admissions. Review of General Psychology, 14, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman-Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2017). From the Sylvia Plath effect to social justice: Moving forward with creativity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 173–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Finding meaning with creativity in the past, present, and future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 734–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (2004). The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 14, 15–25.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., & Watson, C. (2016). Creative metacognition and self ratings of creative performance: A 4-C perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 394–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Glăveanu, V., & Baer, J. (eds.). (2017). The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Plucker, J. A. (2011). Intelligence and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 771–783). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kharkhurin, A. V. (2014). Creativity 4 in 1: Four-criterion construct of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 338–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité [The psychology of creativity]. Paris: ArmandColin.Google Scholar
Luria, S. R., O’Brien, R. L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity in gifted identification: Increasing accuracy and diversity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKay, A. S., Grygiel, P., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Connected to create: A social network analysis of friendship ties and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 284–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W. & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Creativity of Chinese and American people: A synthetic analysis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. Principles and procedures of creative thinking (2nd edn). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Paulus, P. & Nijstad, B. (eds.). (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (2005). The (relatively) generalist view of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (eds), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 307–312). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A. & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M. G., Pradies, C., & Lepisto, D. A. (2013). Doing well, doing good, and doing with: Organizational practices for effectively cultivating meaningful work. In Dik, B. J., Byrne, Z. S., & Steger, M. F. (eds.), Purpose and meaning in the workplace (pp. 173–196). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R. & Robinson, E. J. (2009). Problem identification and construction: What do we know, what is the future? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter-Palmon, R., Wigert, B., & de Vreede, T. (2012). Team creativity and innovation: The effect of group composition, social processes, and cognition. In Mumford, M. (ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 295–326). London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, A. (2014). Flight from wonder: An investigation of scientific creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd edn). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2007). Creative life cycles in literature: Poets versus novelists or conceptualists versus experimentalists? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 133–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2011). Creativity and discovery as blind variation and selective retention: Multiple-variant definitions and blind-sighted integration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 222–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US Patent Office creativity criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 125–147). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1999a). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2016). What universities can be: A new model for preparing students for active concerned citizenship and ethical leadership. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12, 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). When your race is almost run, but you feel you’re not yet done: Application of the propulsion theory of creative contributions to late-career challenges. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Societal forces that ERODE creativity. Teachers College Record, 120, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). The propulsion model of creative contributions applied to the arts and letters. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2004). A propulsion model of creative leadership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C, & Block, C. H. (1978). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Directions manual and scoring guide, verbal test booklet B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (2008). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Unsworth, K. (2001). Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review, 26, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Edited by Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. & Souberman, E.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
References
Acar, S. & Runco, M. A. (2015). Thinking in multiple directions: Hyperspace categories in divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An, D. & Runco, M. A. (2016). General and domain-specific contributions to creative ideation and creative performance. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(4), 523–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachelor, P. (1989). Maximum likelihood confirmatory factor-analytic investigation of factors within Guilford’s Structure-of-Intellect model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 797–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1994). Performance assessments of creativity: Do they have long-term stability? Roeper Review, 7(1), 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. (2011a). How divergent thinking tests mislead us: Are the Torrance Tests still relevant in the 21st century? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. (2011b). Four (more) arguments against the Torrance Tests. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 316–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, F. & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basadur, M. S. & Finkbeiner, C. T. (1985). Measuring preference for ideation in creative problem-solving training. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basadur, M., Graen, G. B., & Green, S. G. (1982). Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1), 41–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basadur, M. & Hausdorf, P. A. (1996). Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and innovation management. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basadur, M., Pringle, P., & Kirkland, D. (2002). Crossing cultures: Training effects on the divergent thinking attitudes of Spanish-speaking South American managers. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basadur, M., Taggar, S., & Pringle, P. (1999). Improving the measurement of divergent thinking attitudes in organizations. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 75–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basadur, M. S., Wakabayashi, M., & Takai, J. (1992). Training effects on the divergent thinking attitudes of Japanese managers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batey, M. & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2014). Does insight problem solving predict real-world creativity? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baxter, J. (2011). Answering the unexpected questions: Student self-beliefs and teacher ratings of creativity in elementary math and science. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedek, M., Mühlmann, C., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 341–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Besemer, S. P. & O’Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three-factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossomaier, T., Harré, M., Knittel, A., & Snyder, A. (2009). A semantic network approach to the creativity quotient (CQ). Creativity Research Journal, 21, 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, C. M., Hunsaker, S. L., Adams, C. M., Moore, S. D., & Bland, L. C. (1995). Instruments used in the identification of gifted and talented students (Report No. RM-95130). Charlottesville, VA: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.Google Scholar
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B. & Butcher, H. (1968). The prediction of achievement and creativity. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the sixteen personality questionnaire (16 PF). Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
Chand, I. & Runco, M. A. (1992). Problem finding skills as components in the creative process. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S. A. & Michael, W. B. (1993). First-order and higher-order factors of creative social intelligence within Guilford’s Structure-of-Intellect Model: A reanalysis of a Guilford data base. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 619–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiaans, H. H. C. M. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, M. M. (1996). The construct validity of divergent scores in the Structure-of-Intellect Learning Abilities Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, M. M., Cowdery, E. M., King, K. E., & Montang, M. A. (2005). Predicting work activities with divergent thinking tests: A longitudinal study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Hallowell, K., Huesman, R., & Gaeth, J. (1992). The Iowa inventiveness inventory: Toward a measure of mechanical inventiveness. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, R., Coon, H., & Amabile, T. M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 385–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, E. (1991). A critique of six measures for assessing creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramond, B. (1993). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: From design through establishment of predictive validity. In Subotnik, R. F. & Arnold, K. D. (eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 229–254). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidovitch, N. & Milgram, R. M. (2006). Creative thinking as a predictor of teacher effectiveness in higher education. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. A. (1989). Testing for creative potential. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Burke, P. A., & Gump, N. W. (2007). Creativity and values. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., & Shafran, M. (2005). Note on Consensual Assessment Technique in creativity research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 592–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domino, G. (1994). Assessment of creativity with the ACL: An empirical comparison of four scales. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fodor, E. M. & Carver, R. A. (2000). Achievement and power motives, performance feedback, and creativity. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 380–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, J. B., & Domm, D. R. (2004). Creativity and productivity: Resolving the conflict. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 69(2), 4–11.Google Scholar
Gagné, F. (1994). Are teachers really poor talent detectors? Comments on Pegnato and Birch’s (1959) study of the effectiveness and efficiency of various identification techniques. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 124–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getzels, J. W. & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gist, M. E. & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). International Personality Item Pool: A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality and other individual differences (website). https://ipip.ori.org/Google Scholar
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity and their educational implications. New York: Robert R. Knapp.Google Scholar
Hall, W. & MacKinnon, D. W. (1969). Personality inventory correlates of creativity among architects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 322–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hass, R. W. (2015). Feasibility of online divergent thinking assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heausler, N. L. & Thompson, B. (1988). Structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 463–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hébert, T. P., Cramond, B., Spiers-Neumeister, K. L., Millar, G., & Silvian, A. F. (2002). E. Paul Torrance: His life, accomplishments, and legacy. Storrs, CT: The University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The Consensual Assessment Technique: An examination of the relationship between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, M. (2001). An application of Amabile’s consensual assessment technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 234–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocevar, D. (1979). The development of the Creative Behavior Inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 170 350).Google Scholar
Hocevar, D. & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53–75). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocevar, D. & Michael, W. B. (1979). The effects of scoring formulas on the discriminant validity of tests of divergent thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 917–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, E., Milgram, R. M., & Gorsky, H. (1995). Original thinking as a predictor of creative performance in young children. Roeper Review, 18, 147–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, J. L. & Knapp, J. R. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford’s structure of intellect model. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, D. & Salvendy, G. (2006a). Consumer-based assessment of product creativity: A review and reappraisal. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 16, 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, D. & Salvendy, G. (2006b). Product creativity: Conceptual model, measurement and characteristics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7, 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, D. & Salvendy, G. (2009). Measuring consumer perception of product creativity: Impact on satisfaction and purchasability. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 19, 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, W. & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunsaker, S. L. & Callahan, C. M. (1995). Creativity and giftedness: Published instrument uses and abuses. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 110–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaksen, S. G. & Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Creative problem-solving: The basic course. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.Google Scholar
Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, K. K. (2017). A CAT with caveats: Is the Consensual Assessment Technique a reliable measure of graphic design creativity? International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 5, 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative Mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karwowski, M. & Lebuda, I. (2015). The Big Five, the Huge Two, and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 214–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman-Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Cole, J. C. (2009). Expertise, domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cropley, D. H., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Sinnett, S. (2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 332–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Gentile, C. A., & Baer, J. (2005). Do gifted student writers and creative writing experts rate creativity the same way? Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2016). Opening up openness to experience: A four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Creative Behaviors, 47, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2011a). The APA 2009 Division 10 debate: Are the Torrance tests still relevant in the 21st century? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 302–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2011b). Proven reliability and validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 314–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, L. A., McKee Walker, L., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, M. J. (2006). Adaptation-innovation in the context of diversity and change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Day, J. D., Meara, N. M., & Maxwell, S. (2002). Discrimination of social knowledge and its flexible application from creativity: A multitrait-multimethod approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 913–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, G. J. M., van der Wijst, A., Curşeu, P. L., & Looman, W. M. (2013). An evaluation of alternative ways of computing the creativity quotient in a design school sample. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 348–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity. Buffalo, NY: The Creative Education Foundation.Google Scholar
Makel, M. C. & Plucker, J. A. (2014). Creativity is more than novelty: Reconsidering replication as a creativity act. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 27–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClain, M. C. & Pfeiffer, S. (2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States today: A look at state definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28, 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKay, A. S., Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Measuring the muses: Validating the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 216–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeker, M. & Meeker, R. (1982). Structure-of-intellect learning abilities test: Evaluation, leadership, and creative thinking. El Segundo, CA: SOI Institute.Google Scholar
Milgram, R. M. & Hong, E. (1994). Creative thinking and creative performance in adolescents as predictors of creative attainments in adults: A follow-up study after 18 years. In Subotnik, R. F. & Arnold, K. D. (eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 212–228). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Pegnato, C. W. & Birch, J. W. (1959). Locating gifted children in junior high schools: A comparison of methods. Exceptional Children, 25, 300–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (1999a). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal study data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (1999b). Reanalyses of student responses to creativity checklists: Evidence of content generality. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 126–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (2004). Generalization of creativity across domains: Examination of the method effect hypothesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A., Kaufman, J. C., Temple, J. S., & Qian, M. (2009). Do experts and novices evaluate movies the same way? Psychology and Marketing, 26, 470–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A., Qian, M., & Wang, S. (2011). Is originality in the eye of the beholder? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of divergent thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A., Qian, M., & Schmalensee, S. L. (2014). Is what you see what you really get? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of real-world divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A., Runco, M. A., & Lim, W. (2006). Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, T. (2006). Self-evaluation, creativity, and musical achievement. Psychology of Music, 34, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyryt, M. (2004). Pegnato revisited: Using discriminant analysis to identify gifted children. Psychology Science, 46, 342–347.Google Scholar
Qian, M., Plucker, J. A., & Shen, J. (2010). A model of Chinese adolescents’ creative personality. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randel, A. E. & Jaussi, K. S. (2003). Functional background identity, diversity, and individual performance in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 763–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, S. M. & Renzulli, J. S. (1991). The assessment of creative products in programs for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 128–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. S., Hartman, R. K., & Callahan, C. M. (1981). Teacher identification of superior students. In Barbe, W. B. & Renzulli, J. S. (eds.), Psychology and education of the gifted (3rd edn, pp. 151–156). New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Technical and administration manual (rev. edn). Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (1985). Reliability and convergent validity of ideational flexibility as a function of academic achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1075–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. (1986). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. (1989). The creativity of children’s art. Child Study Journal, 19, 177–189.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (1999) Divergent thinking. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. (eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 577–582). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., Acar, S., & Cayirdaga, N. (2017). A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 242–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. & Basadur, M. (1993). Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2, 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. & Chand, I. (1994). Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. In Runco, M. A. (ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 40–76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., McCarthy, K. A., & Svenson, E. (1994). Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists. The Journal of Psychology, 128, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. & Mraz, W. (1992). Scoring divergent thinking tests using total ideational output and a creativity index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. & Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. & Vega, L. (1990). Evaluating the creativity of children’s ideas. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 439–452.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., Walczyk, J. J., Acar, S., Cowger, E. L., Simundson, M., & Tripp, S. (2014). The incremental validity of a short form of the ideational behavior scale and usefulness of distractor, contraindicative, and lie scales. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruscio, J., Whitney, D. M., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Looking inside the fishbowl of creativity: Verbal and behavioral predictors of creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, K. (2015). A call to action: The challenges of creative teaching and learning. Teachers College Record, 117(10), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenkel, M. T., Farmer, S. M., & Maslyn, J. M. (2015). From harmonious passion to innovation: Examining the roles of creative self-efficacy and leadership. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 12909–12909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2011). Subjective scoring of divergent thinking: Examining the reliability of unusual uses, instances, and consequences tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6, 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Martin, C., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2009). A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C. Martin, C., & O’Conner, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, higher-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., … Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, A., Mitchell, J., Bossomaier, T., & Pallier, G. (2004). The creativity quotient: An objective scoring of ideational fluency. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Making school reform work: A “mineralogical” theory of school modifiability. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2016). What universities can be: A new model for preparing students for active concerned citizenship and ethical leadership. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(1), 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Bonney, C. R., Gabora, L., & Merrifield, M. (2012). WICS: A model for college and university admissions. Educational Psychologist, 47(1), 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). Guilford’s Structure of Intellect model and model of creativity: Contributions and limitations. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). The propulsion model of creative contributions applied to the arts and letters. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. W. & Barron, F. (1963). Preface. In Taylor, C. W. & Barron, F. (eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. xiii–xix). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Thompson, B. & Anderson, B. V. (1983). Construct validity of the divergent production subtests from the structure-of-intellect learning abilities test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 651–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, P. & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, P. & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 277–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1981). Thinking creatively in action and movement. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1982). Misperceptions about creativity in gifted education: Removing the limits on learning. In, S. N. Kaplan, A. H. Passow, P. H. Phenix, S. M. Reis, J. S. Renzulli, I. S. Soto, L. H. Smith, E. P. Torrance, & V. S. Ward, (eds.), Curriculum for the gifted: Selected proceedings of the first national conference on curricula for the gifted/talented (pp. 59–74). Ventura, CA: Office of the Ventura County Superintendent of Schools.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43–75). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (2008). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual, verbal forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. & Safter, H. T. (1989). The long range predictive validity of the just suppose test. Journal of Creative Behavior, 23, 219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartanian, O. (2014). Toward a cumulative psychological science of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallach, M. A. & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Yamada, H. & Tam, A. Y.-W. (1996). Prediction study of adult creative achievement: Torrance’s longitudinal study of creativity revisited. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Adam-Price, C. (ed.) (1998). Creativity and successful aging: Theoretical and empirical approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Alfonso-Benlliure, V. & Santos, M. R. (2016). Creativity development trajectories in elementary education: Differences in divergent and evaluative skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19(1), 160–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Artistico, D., Cervone, D., & Pezzuti, L. (2003). Perceived self-efficacy and everyday problem solving among young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 18, 68–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baer, J. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 37, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
>Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 366–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U. (1999). Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 471–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbot, B., Lubart, T. I., & Bescançon, M. (2016). “Peaks, slumps, and bumps”: Individual differences in the development of creativity in children and adolescents. Perspectives on creativity development. New directions for child and adolescent development, 151, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (2005). The pursuit of meaningfulness in life. In Snyder, C. R. & Lopez, S. J. (eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 608–618). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., Hegarty, B., Hammond, H. L., & Wilcox-Herzog, A. (2012). Cultivating creativity in early childhood education: A 4 C perspective. In Saracho, O. N. (ed.), Contemporary perspectives on research in creativity in early childhood education (pp. 251–270). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binnewies, C., Ohly, S., & Niessen, C. (2008). Age and creativity at work: The interplay between job resources, age and idea creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 438–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard-Fields, F., Mienaltowski, A., & Seay, R. B. (2007). Age differences in everyday problem-solving effectiveness: Older adults select more effective strategies for interpersonal problems. Journal of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlsen, M. B. (1995). Meaning-making and creative aging. In Neimeyer, R. A. & Mahoney, M. J. (eds.), Constructivism in psychotherapy (pp. 127–153). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Creativity versus conscientiousness: Which is a better predictor of student performance? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 521–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S.-H., Wang, C.-L., & Lee, J.-C. (2016). Do award-winning experiences benefit students’ creative self-efficacy and creativity? The moderated mediation effects of perceived school support for creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y.-S. & Hu, M.-C. (2008). The impact of task motivation and organizational innovative climate on adult education teachers’ creative teaching performance: An analysis of hierarchical linear modeling. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 40, 179–198.Google Scholar
Cheung, P. C., Lau, S., Chan, D. W., & Wu, W. Y. H. (2004). Creative potential of school children in Hong Kong: Norms of the Wallach-Kogan Creativity Tests and their implications. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, M. M., Cowdery, E. M., King, K. E., & Montang, M. A. (2005). Predicting work activities with divergent thinking tests: A longitudinal study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. D., Perlstein, S., Chapline, J., Kelly, J., Firth, K. M., & Simmens, S. (2006). The impact of professionally conducted cultural programs on the physical health, mental health, and social functioning of older adults. The Gerontologist, 46, 726–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craft, A. (2010). Possibility thinking and wise creativity: Educational futures in England? In Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 289–312). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craft, A., Cremin, T., Burnard, P., Dragovic, T., & Chappell, K. (2013). Possibility thinking: Culminative studies of an evidence-based concept driving creativity? Education 3–13, 41, 538–556.Google Scholar
Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daugherty, M. (1993). Creativity and private speech: Developmental trends. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, D. (2016). Authentic assessment in music composition: Feedback that facilitates creativity. Music Educators Journal, 102, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudek, S. & Croteau, H. (1998). Aging and creativity in eminent architects. In Adams-Price, C. (ed.), Creativity and successful aging: Theoretical and empirical approaches (pp. 117–152). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. (2002). Beliefs that make smart people dumb. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid (pp. 24–41). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 329–333.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative personality. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 113–130). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C. M. (2000). Dialogue: Creative developments in creative theory. Academy of Management Review, 25, 284–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H. (2011). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granott, N. & Parziale, J. (2002). Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannenmann, B. T. (2006). Creativity with dementia patients: Can creativity and art stimulate dementia patients positively. Gerontology, 52, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, M. H. (2013). Author, self, monster: Using Foucault to examine functions of creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33, 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, D. M., Block, J. W., & Block, J. (1987). Testing aspects of Carl Rogers’ theory of creative environments: Childrearing antecedents of creative environments in young adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 851–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, W. J., Chan, M. K., & Wong, W. C. (2017). Music exposure, emotional responses, and creativity: Perspective from the arousal-and-mood hypothesis. Paper presented at the Asian Conference on Education and Psychology, March 27–29, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
He, W. J. & Wong, W. C. (2015). Creativity slump and school transition stress: A sequential study from the perspective of the cognitive-relational theory of stress. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, W. J., Wong, W. C., & Chan, M. K (2017). Overexcitabilities as important psychological attributes of creativity: A Dabrowskian perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, W. J., Wong, W. C., & Hui, A. N. N. (2017). Emotional reactions mediate the effect of music listening on creative thinking: Perspective of the arousal-and-mood hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckhausen, J. (2005). Psychological approaches to human development. In Johnson, M. L. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of age and ageing (pp. 180–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickson, J. & Housley, W. (1997). Creativity in later life. Educational Gerontology, 23, 539–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, J. & Russ, S. (2012). Pretend play, creativity and emotion regulation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, J. & Russ, S. (2016). Fostering pretend play skills and creativity in elementary school girls: A group play intervention. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, A. N. N. (2013). Creativity & leisure: An activity and engagement perspective. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 17(Suppl. 1), S125.Google Scholar
Hui, A.N. N., He, M., Liu-Au, E., & Ching, C. (2015). Thinking creatively across the lifespan. In Wegerif, R., Li, L., & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking (pp. 212–225). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hui, A. N. N. & Liang, E. (2012). Creativity as a reserve capacity in older adults and a virtue in positive psychology. Symposium presentation in the Second China International Conference on Positive Psychology, November 9–11, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Hui, A. N. N., Yeung, D. Y., Sue-Chan, C., Chan, K., Hui, D., & Cheng, S. T. (2014). Gains and losses in creative personality as perceived by adults across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 709–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaquish, G. A. & Ripple, R. E. (1981). Cognitive creative abilities and self-esteem across the adult life-span. Human Development, 24(2), 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandler, C., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., Spinath, F. M., Borkenau, P., & Penke, L. (2016). The nature of creativity: The roles of genetic factors, personality traits, cognitive abilities, and environmental sources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 230–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992/1999). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2013). “Microgenetics”: No single method can elucidate human learning. Human Development, 56, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Gentile, C. A., & Baer, J. (2005). Do gifted student writers and creative writing experts rate creativity the same way? Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kaugars, A. S. & Russ, S. W. (2009). Assessing preschool children’s pretend play: Preliminary validation of the affect in play scale – preschool version. Early Education and Development, 20, 733–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kientiz, E., Quintin, E.-M., Saggar, M., Bott, N. T., Royalty, A. et al. (2014). Targeted intervention to increase creative capacity and performance: A randomized controlled pilot study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieran, M. (2014). Creativity as a virtue of character. In Paul, E. S. & Kaufman, S. B. (eds.), The philosophy of creativity: New essays (pp. 125–144). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2011). Proven reliability and validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 314–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, N. (1973). Creativity and cognitive style: A life-span perspective. In Baltes, P. B. & Schaie, K. W. (eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Personality and socialization (pp. 145–178). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krampen, G. (2012). Cross-sequential results on creativity development in childhood within two different school systems: Divergent performances in Luxembourg versus German kindergarten and elementary school students. European Journal of Psychology, 8, 423–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindauer, M. S. (2003). Aging, creativity, and art: A positive perspective on late-life development. New York: Kluwer Academic and Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, D., Jiang, K. F., Shalley, C. E., Keem, S., & Zhou, J. (2016). Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 236–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzen-Huber, L. (1991). Self-perceived creativity in the later years: Case studies of older Nebraskans. Educational Gerontology, 17, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubart, T. I. & Lautrey, J. (1995). Relationships between creative development and cognitive development. Paper presented at the Seventh European Conference on Developmental Psychology, August 22–26, Krakow, Poland.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I. & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Life span creativity: An investment theory approach. In Adam-Price, C. (ed.), Creativity and successful aging: Theoretical and empirical approach (pp. 21–41). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Madjar, N., Greenberg, E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 730–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrae, R. R., Arenberg, D., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1987). Declines in divergent thinking with age: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and cross-sequential analyses. Psychology and Aging, 2, 130–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meléndez, J. C., Alfonso-Benlliure, V., Mayordomo, T., & Sales, A. (2016). Is age just a number? Cognitive reserve as a predictor of divergent thinking in late adulthood. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 435–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, T. W., Hur, W. M., & Hyun, S. H. S. (2017). How service employees’ work motivations lead to job performance: The role of service employees’ job creativity and customer orientation. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9630-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, S. (2010). The roles of creativity in society. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 74–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, W. H. & Liu, D. (2009). Enhancing creativity: A comparison between effects of an indicative instruction “to be creative” and a more elaborate heuristic instruction on Chinese student creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: What instructing people to “be creative” reveals about the meaning and mechanisms of divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onarheim, B. & Friis-Olivarius, M. (2013). Applying the neuroscience of creativity to creativity training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00656CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmiero, M. (2015). The effects of age on divergent thinking and creative objects production: A cross-sectional study. High Ability Studies, 26, 93–104.Google Scholar
Parisi, J. M., Greene, J. C., Morrow, D. G., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2007). The senior odyssey: Participant experiences of a program of social and intellectual engagement. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 31, 31–49.Google Scholar
Paul, E. S. & Kaufman, S. B. (eds.). (2014). The philosophy of creativity: New essays. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piffer, D. (2012). Can creativity be measured? An attempt to clarify the notion of creativity and general directions for future research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 258–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucker, J. A. & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pramling, S. I. & Carlsson, A. M. (2008). The playing learning child: Towards a pedagogy of early childhood. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 623–641.Google Scholar
Puccio, G. J., Talbot, R. J., & Joniak, A. J. (2000). Examining creative performance in the workplace through a person–environment fit model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34, 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, S. J. & Puccio, G. J. (2014). Cross-cultural studies of implicit theories of creativity: A comparative analysis between the United States and the main ethnic groups in Singapore. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reese, H. W., Lee, L. J., Cohen, S. H., & Puckett, J. M. Jr. (2001). Effects of intellectual variables, age, and gender on divergent thinking in adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reifel, S. & Sutterby, J. A. (2009). Play theory and practices in contemporary classrooms. In Feeney, S., Galper, A., & Seefeldt, C. (eds.), Continuing issues in early childhood education (3rd edn, pp. 238–257). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
Reilly, R. C. (2008). Is expertise a necessary precondition for creativity? A case of four novice learning group facilitators. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaniuk, J. G. & Romaniuk, M. (1981). Creativity across the life span: A measurement perspective. Human Development, 24, 366–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenblatt, E. & Winner, E. (1988). Is superior visual memory a component of superior drawing ability? In Obler, L. & Fein, D. (eds.), The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and superior abilities (pp. 341–363). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., Black, S. R., & Mccown, S. M. (2008). Age-related changes in creative thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. & Cayirdag, N. (2012). The theory of personal creativity and implications for the fulfillment of children’s potentials. In Saracho, O. N. (ed.), Contemporary perspectives on research in creativity in early childhood education (pp. 31–43). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. & Charles, R. (1997). Developmental trends in creativity. In Runco, M. A. (ed.), Creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 113–150). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
Russ, S. W. & Schafer, E. D. (2006). Affect in fantasy play, emotion in memories and divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruth, J.-E. & Birren, J. E. (1985). Creativity in adulthood and old age: Relations to intelligence, sex and mode of testing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 8, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasser-Coen, J. R. (1993). Qualitative changes in creativity in the second half of life: A life-span developmental perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 27, 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimonaka, Y. & Nakazato, K. (2007). Creativity and factors affecting creative ability in adulthood and old age. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 231–243.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., & Kwapil, T. R. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: An experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1977). Cross-sectional time-series experiments: Some suggested statistical analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 84(3), 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014). Creative performance, expertise acquisition, individual differences, and developmental antecedents: An integrative research agenda. Intelligence, 45, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. L. (2009). Researching imaginative play and adult consciousness: Implications for daily and literary creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 190–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Parisi, J. M., Morrow, D. G., & Park, D. C. (2008). The effects of an engaged lifestyle on cognitive vitality: A field experiment. Psychology and Aging, 23, 778–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storme, M., Myszkowski, N., Çelik, P., & Lubart, T. (2014). Learning to judge creativity: The underlying mechanisms in creativity training for non-expert judges. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroebe, W. (2010). The graying of academia: Will it reduce scientific productivity? American Psychologist, 65, 660–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tadmor, C. T., Galinsky, A. D., & Maddux, W. W. (2012). Getting the most out of living abroad: Biculturalism and integrative complexity as key drivers of creative and professional success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 520–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Sassa, Y., Hashizume, H., Sekiguchi, A., Fukushima, A., & Kawashima, R. (2010). White matter structures associated with creativity from diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage, 51, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tegano, D. W., Moran, J. D., & Sawyers, J. K. (1991). Creativity in early childhood classrooms. Washington, DC: NEA Professional Library, National Education Association.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1963). Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12, 195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom: What research says to the teacher. Washington, DC: NEA Professional Library, National Education Association.Google Scholar
Unsworth, K. L. & Clegg, C. W. (2010). Why do employees undertake creative action? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urban, K. K. (1991). On the development of creativity in children. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urban, K. K. (2004). Assessing creativity: The Test for Creative Thinking – Drawing Production (TCT-DP), the concept, application, evaluation, and international studies. Psychological Science, 46, 387–397.Google Scholar
Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, I., Chandler, L., & Grainger, P. (2017). Engaging creativity: Employing assessment feedback strategies to support confidence and creativity in graphic design practice. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 16, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1931/1997). Analysis of higher mental functions. In Rieber, R. W. (ed.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions (pp. 65–82). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1967/2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood (trans. by M. E. Sharpe, Inc.). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, E. C., Clark, Z., & DiBartolomeo, D. J. (2014). A decline in creativity? It depends on the domain. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2015). Expertise, nonobvious creativity, and ordinary thinking in Edison and others: Integrating blindness and sightedness. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wundt, W. (1905/1919). Völkerpsychologie. Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. [Cultural Psychology. An investigation on the developmental principles of language, myth, and morality] Vol. 3: Die Kunst. [Art]. Leipzig: Alfred Kröner Verlag.Google Scholar
Yeh, Y. & Lin, C. F. (2015). Aptitude-treatment interactions during creativity training in e-learning: How meaning-making, self-regulation, and knowledge management influence creativity. Educational Technology and Society, 18, 119–131.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. & Niu, W. H. (2013). Creativity in the later life: Factors associated with the creativity of the Chinese elderly. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 413–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Adelson, B. (1984). When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(3), 483–495.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. & Kramer, S. (2011). The progress principle: Using small wins to ignite joy, engagement and creativity at work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 447–463). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L., III, & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make it stick: The science of successful learning. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Covington, M. V., Crutchfield, R. S., Davies, L., & Olton, R. M. (1974). The productive thinking program: A course in learning to think. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.). (2010). The dark side of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2013). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Dai, D. Y. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.). (2004). Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. E. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.). (2003). The psychology of problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBono, E. (2015). Lateral thinking: Creativity step by step. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
Frensch, P. A. & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gascon, L. D. & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Both sides of the coin?: Personality, deviance and creative behavior. In Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 235–254). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, W. J. J. (1961). Synectics: The development of creative capacity. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gordon, W. J. J. (1966). The metaphorical way of learning and knowing. Cambridge, MA: Porpoise Books.Google Scholar
Gordon, W. J. J. (1981). The new art of the possible: The basic course in Synectics. Cambridge, MA: Porpoise Books.Google Scholar
Isaksen, S. G. & Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Creative problem solving: The basic course. Buffalo, NY: Bearly.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubart, T. I. & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 269–302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, R. S., Bussé, T. V., & Krepelka, E. J. (1978). The psychology of creativity and discovery. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Meadow, A., Parnes, S. J., & Reese, H. (1959). Influence of brainstorming instruction and problem sequence on a creative problem solving test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 413–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W. (2015). The marshmallow test: Why self-control is the engine of success. New York: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933–938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Niu, W. & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Contemporary studies on the concept of creativity: The east and the west. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, A. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Parnes, S. J. & Meadow, A. (1963). Development of individual creative talent. In Taylor, C. W. & Barron, F. (eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 311–320). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2013). Divergent thinking and creative potential. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2017). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Teaching critical thinking, part 1: Are we making critical mistakes? Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 194–198.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Questioning and intelligence. Questioning Exchange, 1, 11–14.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Answering questions and questioning answers. Phi Delta Kappan, 76 (2), 136–138.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Creativity is a decision. In Costa, A. L. (ed.), Teaching for intelligence II (pp. 85–106). Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight Training and Publishing.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). The development of creativity as a decision-making process. In Sawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R. J., Feldman, D. H., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 91–138). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). The dark side of creativity and how to combat it. In Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 316–328). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). A capsule history of theory and research on styles. In Sternberg, R. J. & Zhang, L. F. (eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles (pp. 1–21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (2007). Teaching for successful intelligence (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2009). Teaching for wisdom, intelligence, creativity, and success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Explorations of the nature of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & Williams, W. M. (2001). Teaching for creativity: Two dozen tips. In Small, R. D. & Thomas, A. P. (eds.), Plain talk about education (pp. 153–165). Covington, LA: Center for Development and Learning.Google Scholar
Treffinger, D. J., McEwen, P., & Wittig, C. (1989). Using creative problem solving in inventing. Honeoye, NY: Center for Creative Learning.Google Scholar