Interpersonal and Social Consumer Psychology

Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–357.Google Scholar

Aaker, J. L. (1999). The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 45–57.Google Scholar

Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. Quarterly journal of Economics, 115(3), 715–753.Google Scholar

Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20(1), 1–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Allport, D. (1985). Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In Newman, S. P. & Epstein, R. (eds.), Current Perspectives in Dysphasia (pp. 32–60). Edinburgh: Churchil Livingstone.Google Scholar

Amaldoss, W., & Jain, S. (2005). Conspicuous consumption and sophisticated thinking. Management Science, 51(10), 1449–1466.Google Scholar

Andrade, E. B., & Ho, T. H. (2009). Gaming emotions in social interactions. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 539–552.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 279–290.Google Scholar

Aronson, E. (1992). The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological inquiry, 3(4), 303–311.Google Scholar

Aronson, E. (1999). The power of self-persuasion. American Psychologist, 54(11), 875–884.Google Scholar

Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21(3), 372–374.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57(3), 547–579.Google Scholar

Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 183–194.Google Scholar

Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 473–481.Google Scholar

Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–167.Google Scholar

Belk, R. W., Bahn, K. D., & Mayer, R. N. (1982). Developmental recognition of consumption symbolism. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 4–17.Google Scholar

Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Bellezza, S., Gino, F., & Keinan, A. (2014). The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 35–54.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2008). Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(3), 593 – 607.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Berger, J., & Le Mens, G. (2009). How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(20), 8146–8150.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Rand, L. (2008). Shifting signals to help health: Using identity signaling to reduce risky health behaviors. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 509–518.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Schwartz, E. M. (2011). What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 869–880.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Ward, M. (2010). Subtle signals of inconspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), 555–569.Google Scholar

Bhattacharjee, A., Berger, J., & Menon, G. (2014). When identity marketing backfires: Consumer agency in identity expression. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 294–309.Google Scholar

Bodner, R., & Prelec, D. (2003). Self-signaling and diagnostic utility in everyday decision making. Psychology of Economic Decisions, 1, 105–126.Google Scholar

Braun, O. L., & Wicklund, R. A. (1989). Psychological antecedents of conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(2), 161–187.Google Scholar

Brenner, L., Rottenstreich, Y., Sood, S., & Bilgin, B. (2007). On the psychology of loss aversion: Possession, valence, and reversals of the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 369–376.Google Scholar

Calder, B. J., & Burnkrant, R. E. (1977). Interpersonal influence on consumer behavior: An attribution theory approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 29–38.Google Scholar

Chan, C., Berger, J., & Van Boven, L. (2012). Identifiable but not identical: Combining social identity and uniqueness motives in choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 561–573.Google Scholar

Chernev, A., Hamilton, R., & Gal, D. (2011). Competing for consumer identity: Limits to self-expression and the perils of lifestyle branding. Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 66–82.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Wosinska, W., Barrett, D. W., Butner, J., & Gornik-Durose, M. (1999). Compliance with a request in two cultures: The differential influence of social proof and commitment/consistency on collectivists and individualists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1242–1253.Google Scholar

Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 392–414.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (2005). Art as Experience. New York: Berkley.Google Scholar

Dolich, I. J. (1969). Congruence relationships between self images and product brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 6(1), 80–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (1978). The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, D., & Leippe, M. R. (1994). The self-comparison process and self-discrepant feedback: Consequences of learning you are what you thought you were not. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 611–626.Google Scholar

Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339–348.Google Scholar

Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 378–389.Google Scholar

Feltovich, N., Harbaugh, R., & To, T. (2002). Too cool for school? Signalling and countersignalling. RAND Journal of Economics, 4(33), 630–649.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.CrossRef Google Scholar

Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When Prophecy Fails. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Linzey, G. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. (pp. 915–981). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social Cognition, 2nd ed.. New York, England: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T. (2004). Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373.Google Scholar

Gal, D., & Liu, W. (2011). Grapes of wrath: The angry effects of self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 445–458.Google Scholar

Gal, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2010). When in doubt, shout! Paradoxical influences of doubt on proselytizing. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1701–1707.Google Scholar

Gal, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2011). Answering the unasked question: Response substitution in consumer surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), 185–195.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gal, D., & Wilkie, J. (2010). Real men don't eat quiche: Regulation of gender-expressive choices by men. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(4), 291–301.Google Scholar

Gao, L., Wheeler, S. C., & Shiv, B. (2009). The “shaken self”: Product choices as a means of restoring self-view confidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1), 29–38.Google Scholar

Gardner, B. B., & Levy, S. J. (1955). The product and the brand. Harvard Business Review, 33(2), 33–39.Google Scholar

Gillath, O., Bahns, A. J., Ge, F., & Crandall, C. S. (2012). Shoes as a source of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(4), 423–430.CrossRef Google Scholar

Glazer, A., & Konrad, K. A. (1996). A signaling explanation for charity. American Economic Review, 86(4), 1019–1028.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., Bellezza, F. S., & Banaji, M. R. (1988). Is self-esteem a central ingredient of the self-concept? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(1), 34–45.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 281–294.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 85–102.Google Scholar

Gross, H. E. (1977). Micro and macro level implications for a sociology of virtue: The case of draft protesters to the Vietnam War. Sociological Quarterly, 18(3), 319–339.CrossRef Google Scholar

Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 15–30.Google Scholar

Hegel, . (1807). Phenomenology of Spirit, Miller, A. V., trans. New York: OUP.Google Scholar

Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766–794.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 88–110.Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T., & Rholes, W. S. (1978). “Saying is believing”: Effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(4), 363–378.Google Scholar

Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132–140.CrossRef Google Scholar

Holman, R. H. (1981). Product as communication: A fresh appraisal of a venerable topic. In Eris, B. M. & Boering, K. J. (eds.), Review of Marketing (pp. 106–119). Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Valuing public goods: The purchase of Moral Satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(1), 57–70.Google Scholar

Kassarjian, H. H. (1971). Personality and consumer behavior: A review. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(4), 409–418.Google Scholar

Kettle, K. L., & Häubl, G. (2011). The signature effect: Signing influences consumption-related behavior by priming self-identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 474–489.Google Scholar

Kiesler, C. A., Roth, T. S., & Pallak, M. S. (1974). Avoidance and reinterpretation of commitment and its implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(5), 705–715.Google Scholar

Kiesler, C. A., & Sakumura, J. (1966). A test of a model for commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(3), 349–353.Google Scholar

Kim, H. S., & Drolet, A. (2003). Choice and self-expression: A cultural analysis of variety-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 373–382.Google Scholar

Kim, H. S., & Sherman, D. K. (2007). “Express yourself”: Culture and the effect of self-expression on choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 1–11.Google Scholar

Kim, S., & Gal, D. (2014). From compensatory consumption to adaptive consumption: The role of self-acceptance in resolving self-deficits. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 526–542.Google Scholar

Kleine, R. E., Kleine, S. S., & Kernan, J. B. (1993). Mundane consumption and the self: A social-identity perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(3), 209–235.Google Scholar

Laran, J., & Janiszewski, C. (2011). Work or fun? How task construal and completion influence regulatory behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 967–983.Google Scholar

Laverie, D. A., Kleine, R. E., & Kleine, S. S. (2002). Reexamination and extension of Kleine, Kleine, and Kernan's social identity model of mundane consumption: The mediating role of the appraisal process. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 659–669.Google Scholar

Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518–530.Google Scholar

Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2013). Self-threats and consumption. In Ruvio, A. A. & Belk, R. W. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Identity and Consumption (pp. 216–224). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Levav, J., & Zhu, R. J. (2009). Seeking freedom through variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 600–610.Google Scholar

Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117–124.Google Scholar

Linville, P. W., & Carlston, D. E. (1994). Social cognition of the self. In Devine, P. G., Hamilton, D. L., & Ostrom, T. M. (eds.), Social Cognition: Its Impact on Social Psychology (pp. 396–403). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Liu, W., & Gal, D. (2011). Bringing us together or driving us apart: The effect of soliciting consumer input on consumers’ propensity to transact with an organization. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 242–259.Google Scholar

Markus, H. R. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 63–78.Google Scholar

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.Google Scholar

Markus, H. R., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleability of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 858–866.Google Scholar

Markus, H. R., & Schwartz, B. (2010). Does choice mean freedom and well-being? Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 344–355.Google Scholar

Mazzocco, P. J., Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Anderson, E. T. (2012). Direct and vicarious conspicuous consumption: Identification with low-status groups increases the desire for high-status goods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), 520–528.Google Scholar

McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 71–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310–321.Google Scholar

McFerran, B., Dahl, D. W., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Morales, A. C. (2010). I'll have what she's having: Effects of social influence and body type on the food choices of others. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 915–929.Google Scholar

McShane, B. B., Bradlow, E. T., & Berger, J. (2012). Visual influence and social groups. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 854–871.Google Scholar

Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., Rawn, C. D., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 902–919.Google Scholar

Moller, A. C., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). Choice and ego-depletion: The moderating role of autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(8), 1024–1036.Google Scholar

Morewedge, C. K., Shu, L. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2009). Bad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 947–951.Google Scholar

Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412–432.Google Scholar

Nelissen, R., & Meijers, M. H. (2011). Social benefits of luxury brands as costly signals of wealth and status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(5), 343–355.Google Scholar

Niedenthal, P. M., Cantor, N., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1985). Prototype matching: A strategy for social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(3), 575–584.Google Scholar

Oyserman, D. (2009). Identity-based motivation: Implications for action-readiness, procedural-readiness, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 250–260.Google Scholar

Petrocelli, J. V., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Unpacking attitude certainty: Attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 30–41.Google Scholar

Pronin, E., Berger, J., & Molouki, S. (2007). Alone in a crowd of sheep: Asymmetric perceptions of conformity and their roots in an introspection illusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 585–595.Google Scholar

Reb, J., & Connolly, T. (2007). Possession, feelings of ownership, and the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 107–114.Google Scholar

Reed, A., Forehand, M. R., Puntoni, S., & Warlop, L. (2012). Identity-based consumer behaviour. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 310–321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.08.002.Google Scholar

Reingen, P. H., Foster, B. L., Brown, J. J., & Seidman, S. B. (1984). Brand congruence in interpersonal relations: A social network analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3), 771–783.Google Scholar

Richins, M. L. (1994). Possessions and the expression of material values. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 522–533.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ross, I. (1971). Self-concept and brand preference. Journal of Business, 44(1), 38–50.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). Compensatory consumption. In Ruvio, A. A. & Belk, R. W. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Identity and Consumption (pp. 207–215). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 549–555.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Dubois, D. (2012). Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 352–368.Google Scholar

Schau, H. J., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 385–404.Google Scholar

Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar

Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Toguchi, Y. (2003). Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 60–79.Google Scholar

Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1995). The multiply motivated self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(12), 1330–1335.Google Scholar

Shavitt, S. (1990). The role of attitude objects in attitude functions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(2), 124–148.Google Scholar

Shavitt, S., & Nelson, M. R. (1999). The social identity function in person perception: Communicated meanings of product preferences. In Maio, G. R. & Olson, J. M. (eds.), Why We Evaluate: Function of Attitudes (pp. 27–57). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Shavitt, S., Torelli, C. J., & Wong, J. (2009). Identity-based motivation: Constraints and opportunities in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 261–266.Google Scholar

Shu, S. B., & Peck, J. (2011). Psychological ownership and affective reaction: Emotional attachment process variables and the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), 439–452.Google Scholar

Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287–300.Google Scholar

Sivanathan, N., Molden, D. C., Galinsky, A. D., & Ku, G. (2008). The promise and peril of self-affirmation in de-escalation of commitment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107(1), 1–14.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sivanathan, N., & Pettit, N. C. (2010). Protecting the self through consumption: Status goods as affirmational commodities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3), 564–570.Google Scholar

Snyder, C. R. (1992). Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: A consumer catch-22 carousel? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 9–24.Google Scholar

Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518–527.Google Scholar

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.Google Scholar

Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 261–302.CrossRef Google Scholar

Strahilevitz, M. A., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 276–289.Google Scholar

Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 664–680.Google Scholar

Swann, W. B. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In Sulls, J. & Greenwald, A. G. (eds.), Social Psychological Perspectives on the Self (vol. 2, pp. 33–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Swann, W. B., De La Ronde, C., & Hixon, J. G. (1994). Authenticity and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 857–869.Google Scholar

Swann, W. B., Stein-Seroussi, A., & Giesler, R. B. (1992). Why people self-verify. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 392–401.Google Scholar

Tesser, A. (2000). On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(4), 290–299.Google Scholar

Tesser, A., & Cornell, D. P. (1991). On the confluence of self-processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(6), 501–526.Google Scholar

Thompson, C. J., & Hirschman, E. C. (1995). Understanding the socialized body: A poststructuralist analysis of consumers’ self-conceptions, body images, and self-care practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), 139–153.Google Scholar

Thornton, S. (1996). Music Media and Subcultural Capital. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar

Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50–66.Google Scholar

Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973–988.Google Scholar

Toubia, O., & Stephen, A. T. (2013). Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Science, 32(3), 368–392.Google Scholar

Townsend, C., & Sood, S. (2012). Self-affirmation through the choice of highly aesthetic products. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 415–428.Google Scholar

Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506–520.Google Scholar

Twitchell, J. B. (2002). Living It Up. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Veblen, T. (1899). The preconceptions of economic science. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 13(4), 396–426.Google Scholar

Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Simmons, J. P. (2003). Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(2), 118–141.Google Scholar

Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Ciarocco, N. J. (2005). Self-regulation and self-presentation: Regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 632–657.Google Scholar

Wallendorf, M., & Arnould, E. J. (1988). “My favorite things”: A cross-cultural inquiry into object attachment, possessiveness, and social linkage. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 531–547.Google Scholar

Wang, J., Zhu, R. J., & Shiv, B. (2012). The lonely consumer: Loner or conformer? Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1116–1128.Google Scholar

Ward, S. (1974). Consumer socialization. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(2), 1–14.Google Scholar

Wernerfelt, B. (1990). Advertising content when brand choice is a signal. Journal of Business, 63(1), 91–98.Google Scholar

White, K., Argo, J. J., & Sengupta, J. (2012). Dissociative versus associative responses to social identity threat: The role of consumer self-construal. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 704–719.Google Scholar

White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2006). To be or not be? The influence of dissociative reference groups on consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 404–414.Google Scholar

White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2007). Are all out-groups created equal? Consumer identity and dissociative influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 525–536.Google Scholar

Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1981). Symbolic self-completion, attempted influence, and self-deprecation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2(2), 89–114.Google Scholar

Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1982). Symbolic Self-Completion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Abendroth, L. J., & Diehl, K. (2006). Now or never: Effects of limited purchase opportunities on patterns of regret over time. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 342–351.Google Scholar

Adkins, N. R., & Ozanne, J. L. (2005). The low literate consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 93–105.Google Scholar

Agrawal, N., Menon, G., & Aaker, J. L. (2007). Getting emotional about health. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 100–113.Google Scholar

Aldwin, C. M., & Revenson, T. A. (1987). Does coping help? A reexamination of the relation between coping and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(2), 337–348.Google Scholar

Amirkhan, J. H. (1990). A factor analytically derived measure of coping: The Coping Strategy Indicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 1066–1074.Google Scholar

Baker, J. P., & Berenbaum, H. (2007). Emotional approach and problem-focused coping: A comparison of potentially adaptive strategies. Cognition and Emotion, 21(1), 95–118.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.Google Scholar

Bolger, N., & Zuckerman, A. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 890–902.Google Scholar

Brissette, I., Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2002). The role of optimism in social network development, coping, and psychological adjustment during a life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 102–111.Google Scholar

Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 348–370.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. (1981). The Sense of Well-being in America: Recent Patterns and Trends. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1994). Situational coping and coping dispositions in a stressful transaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 184–195.Google Scholar

Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chae, B. G., & Zhu, R. J. (2014). Environmental disorder leads to self-regulatory failure. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1203–1218.Google Scholar

Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1080–1107.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Psychological research in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie, 26(3), 138–141.Google Scholar

Crum, A. J., Salovey, P., & Achor, S. (2013). Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 716–733.Google Scholar

Cui, G., Bao, W., & Chan, T. S. (2009). Consumers’ adoption of new technology products: The role of coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(2), 110–120.Google Scholar

Cutright, K. M. (2012). The beauty of boundaries: When and why we seek structure in consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 775–790.CrossRef Google Scholar

Diener, E.(1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.Google Scholar

Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.Google Scholar

Drolet, A., & Luce, M. F. (2004). The rationalizing effects of cognitive load on emotion-based trade-off avoidance. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 63–77.Google Scholar

Duhachek, A. (2005). Coping: A multidimensional, hierarchical framework of responses to stressful consumption episodes. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 41–53.Google Scholar

Duhachek, A. (2008). Summing up the state of coping research: Prescriptions and prospects for consumer research. In Haugtvedt, C. P., Herr, P. M., & Kardes, F. R. (eds.), Handbook of Consumer Psychology (pp. 1057–1077). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Duhachek, A., Agrawal, N., & Han, D. (2012). Guilt versus shame: Coping, fluency, and framing in the effectiveness of responsible drinking messages. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 928–941.Google Scholar

Duhachek, A., & Iacobucci, D. (2005). Consumer personality and coping: Testing rival theories of process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 52–63.Google Scholar

Duhachek, A., & Kelting, K. (2009). Coping repertoire: Integrating a new conceptualization of coping with transactional theory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 473–485.Google Scholar

Duhachek, A., & Oakley, J. L. (2007). Mapping the hierarchical structure of coping: Unifying empirical and theoretical perspectives. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(3), 218–233.Google Scholar

Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1988). Shades of joy: Patterns of appraisal differentiating pleasant emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 2(4), 301–331.Google Scholar

Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 844–854.Google Scholar

Feick, L. F., & Price, L. L. (1987). The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. Journal of Marketing, 51, 83–87.Google Scholar

Fishbach, A., Dhar, R., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Subgoals as substitutes or complements: The role of goal accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 232–242.Google Scholar

Florian, V., Mikulincer, M., & Taubman, O. (1995). Does hardiness contribute to mental health during a stressful real-life situation? The roles of appraisal and coping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 687–695.Google Scholar

Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R. S. (1989). Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.Google Scholar

Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13(2), 172–175.Google Scholar

French, J. R. Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

Freud, A. (1946). The Ego and Mechanisms and Defence. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar

Gao, L., Wheeler, S. C., & Shiv, D. (2009). The “shaken self”: Product choices as a means of restoring self-view confidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1), 29–38.Google Scholar

Gunthert, K. C., Cohen, L. H., & Armeli, S. (1999). The role of neuroticism in daily stress and coping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1087–1100.Google Scholar

Han, D., Duhachek, A., & Agrawal, N. (2015). Coping, construal and health messages: Response efficacy and self efficacy-based persuasion. Working Paper.Google Scholar

Han, D., Duhachek, A., & Agrawal, N. (2014). Emotions shape decisions through construal level: The case of guilt and shame. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1047–1064.Google Scholar

Han, D., Duhachek, A., & Rucker, D. D. (2015). Distinct threats, common remedies: How consumers cope with psychological threat. Journal of Consumer Psychology, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.02.001.Google Scholar

Holahan, C. J., & Moos, R. H. (1987). Personal and contextual determinants of coping strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 946–955.Google Scholar

Jia, L., Han, D., & Hirt, E. R. (2015). Mental depletion and coping. Working Paper.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (eds). (1999). Well-being: Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Judge, T. A., & Scott, B. A. (2009). The role of core self-evaluations in the coping process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 177–195.Google Scholar

Kees, J., Burton, S., & Tangari, A. H. (2010). The impact of regulatory focus, temporal orientation, and fit on consumer responses to health-related advertising. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 19–34.CrossRef Google Scholar

Keller, P. A. (2006). Regulatory focus and efficacy of health messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(June), 109–114.Google Scholar

Keller, P. A., Lipkus, I. M., & Rimer, B. K. (2002). Depressive realism and health risk accuracy: The negative consequences of positive mood. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(June), 57–69.Google Scholar

Keller, P. A., Lipkus, I. M., & Rimer, B. K. (2003). Affect, framing, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(1), 54–64.Google Scholar

Kim, S., & Rucker, D. D. (2012). Bracing for the psychological storm: Proactive versus reactive compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 815–830.CrossRef Google Scholar

Koo, M., & Fishbach, A. (2008). Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un)accomplished goal actions affect motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 183–195.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A., & Sternthal, B. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735–747.Google Scholar

Lin, Y. C., Lin, C. H., & Raghubir, P. (2003). Avoiding anxiety, being in denial, or simply stroking self-esteem: Why self-positivity? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 464–477.CrossRef Google Scholar

Luce, M. F., Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (1999). Emotional trade-off difficulty and choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 143–159.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mandel, N., & Heine, S. J. (1999). Terror management and marketing: He who dies with the most toys wins. In Arnould, E. J. & Scott, L. M. (eds.), NA-Advances in Consumer Research (vol. 26, pp. 527–532). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R. (1984). Situational determinants of coping responses: Loss, threat, and challenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 919–928.Google Scholar

Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., Rawn, C. D., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(February), 902–919.Google Scholar

Menon, G., Block, L. G., & Ramanathan, S. (2002). We're at as much risk as we are led to believe: Effects of message cues on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(March), 533–549.Google Scholar

Mick, D. G., & Fournier, S. (1998). Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 123–143.Google Scholar

Miller, E. G., Kahn, B. E., & Luce, M. F. (2008). Consumer wait management strategies for negative service events: A coping approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(February), 635–648.Google Scholar

Nowlis, S. M., Kahn, B. E., & Dhar, R. (2002). Coping with ambivalence: The effect of removing a neutral option on consumer attitude and preference judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 319–334.Google Scholar

Parkes, K. R. (1984). Locus of control, cognitive appraisal, and coping in stressful episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 655–668.Google Scholar

Passyn, Kirsten A., and Sujan, Mita (2006). Self-accountability emotions and fear appeals: Motivating behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (4), 583–589..Google Scholar

Pavia, T. M., & Mason, M. J. (2004). The reflexive relationship between consumer behavior and adaptive coping. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 441–454.Google Scholar

Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2–21.Google Scholar

Penley, J. A., Tomaka, J., & Wiebe, J. S. (2002). The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25(6), 551–603.Google Scholar

Raffety, B. D., Smith, R. E., & Ptacek, J. T. (1997). Facilitating and debilitating trait anxiety, situational anxiety, and coping with an anticipated stressor: A process analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 892–906.Google Scholar

Raghunathan, R., Pham, M. T., & Corfman, K. P. (2006). Informational properties of anxiety and sadness, and displaced coping. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 596–601.Google Scholar

Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: A pilot study. Journal of Marketing, 47, 68–78.Google Scholar

Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 93–114.Google Scholar

Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In Cacioppo, J. T. & Petty, R. E. (eds.), Social Psychophysiology (pp. 153–176), New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Rose, R. L., & Wood, S. L. (2005). Paradox and the consumption of authenticity through reality television. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 284–296.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(August), 257–267.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 549–555.Google Scholar

Schaubroeck, J., & Merritt, D. E. (1997). Divergent effects of job control on coping with work stressors: The key role of self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 738–754.Google Scholar

Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Duke, S. C. (2010). Self-control at high and low levels of mental construal. Social Psychological and Personality Science, doi:10.1177/1948550610385955.Google Scholar

Sharma, E., & Alter, A. L. (2012). Financial deprivation prompts consumers to seek scarce goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 545–560.Google Scholar

Skinner, N., & Brewer, N. (2002). The dynamics of threat and challenge appraisals prior to stressful achievement events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 678–692.Google Scholar

Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129(2), 216–269.Google Scholar

Soman, D., & Cheema, A. (2004). When goals are counterproductive: The effects of violation of a behavioral goal on subsequent performance. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(June), 52–62.Google Scholar

Spassova, G., & Lee, A. Y. (2013). Looking into the future: A match between self-view and temporal distance. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(June), 157–171.Google Scholar

Stanton, A. L., Kirk, S. B., Cameron, C. L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2000). Coping through emotional approach: Scale construction and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1150–1169.Google Scholar

Stone, A. A., & Neale, J. M. (1984). New measure of daily coping: Development and preliminary results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 892–906.Google Scholar

Sujan, M., Sujan, H., Bettman, J. R., & Verhallen, T. (1999). Sources of consumers’ stress and their coping strategies. In Proceedings of European Advances in Consumer Research, 4, 182–187.Google Scholar

Tangney, J. P. & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and Guilt. New York: Guilford PressGoogle Scholar

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421.Google Scholar

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.Google Scholar

Tugade, M. M., Fredrickson, B. L., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2004). Psychological resilience and positive emotional granularity: Examining the benefits of positive emotions on coping and health. Journal of Personality, 72(6), 1161–1190.Google Scholar

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–71.Google Scholar

Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1982). Symbolic Self-Completion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Winterich, K. P., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Accepting inequality deters responsibility: How power distance decreases charitable behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 274–293.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yi, S., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Coping with negative emotions in purchase-related situations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3), 303–317.Google Scholar

Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 83(6), 1362–1377.Google Scholar

Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), 511–536. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.324.Google Scholar

Anderson, C., & Thompson, L. L. (2004). Affect from the top down: How powerful individuals’ positive affect shapes negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(2), 125–139.Google Scholar

Bakan, D. (1966). Test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66(6), 423–437. doi: 10.1037/H0020412.Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power–sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 768–781. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.68.5.768.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–8721.2007.00534.x.Google Scholar

Botti, S., Orfali, K., & Iyengar, S. S. (2009). Tragic choices: Autonomy and emotional responses to medical decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 337–352. doi: 10.1086/598969.Google Scholar

Brinol, P., Petty, R. E., Valle, C., Rucker, D. D., & Becerra, A. (2007). The effects of message recipients’ power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1040–1053. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.93.6.1040.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42(1), 33–44.Google Scholar

Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1363–1368. doi: 10.1177/0956797610383437.Google Scholar

Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80. 173–187. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.80.2.173.Google Scholar

Chin, M., Hambrick, D. C., & Treviño, L. K. (2013). Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 197–232.Google Scholar

Côté, S., Kraus, M. W., Cheng, B. H., Oveis, C., van der Lowe, I., Lian, H., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 217–232. doi: 10.1037/a0023171.Google Scholar

DeMarree, K. G., Loersch, C., Brinol, P., Petty, R. E., Payne, B. K., & Rucker, D. D. (2012). From primed construct to motivated behavior: Validation processes in goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1659–1670. doi: 10.1177/0146167212458328.Google Scholar

Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The accentuation bias: Money literally looms larger (and sometimes smaller) to the powerless. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(3), 199–205. doi: 10.1177/1948550610365170.Google Scholar

Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Super size me: Product size as a signal of status. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1047–1062.Google Scholar

Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). The dynamic interplay of communicator and audience power in persuasion. Unpublished Manuscript, Northwestern University.Google Scholar

Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). Social class, power, and selfishness: When and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(3), 436–449. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000008.Google Scholar

Fast, N. J., Halevy, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). The destructive nature of power without status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 391–394.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T. (2010). Interpersonal Stratification: Status, Power, and Subordination: New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). Oxford: University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Gal, D. (2012). A mouth-watering prospect: Salivation to material reward. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1022–1029. doi: 10.1086/661766.Google Scholar

Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453–466. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.85.3.453.Google Scholar

Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Lilenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1450–1466.Google Scholar

Galinsky, A. D., Rucker, D. D., & Magee, J. C. (2015). Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. In Simpson, M. M. J. (assoc. ed.) & Shaver, P. (ed.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 3: Interpersonal Relationships. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Guinote, A. (2007). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1076–1087. doi: 10.1177/0146167207301011.Google Scholar

Inesi, M. E., Botti, S., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Power and choice: Their dynamic interplay in quenching the thirst for personal control. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1042–1048. doi: 10.1177/0956797611413936.Google Scholar

Jiang, Y., Zhan, L., & Rucker, D. D. (2014). Power and action orientation: Power as a catalyst for consumer switching behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 41(3), 183–196.Google Scholar

Jin, L., He, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2014). How power states influence consumers’ perceptions of price unfairness. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 818–833.Google Scholar

Josephs, R. A., Sellers, J. G., Newman, M. L., & Mehta, P. H. (2006). The mismatch effect: When testosterone and status are at odds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 999–1013. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.90.6.999.Google Scholar

Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265–284. doi: 10.1037/0033–295x.110.2.265.Google Scholar

Kim, S., & McGill, A. L. (2011). Gaming with Mr. Slot or gaming the slot machine? Power, anthropomorphism, and risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 94–107.Google Scholar

Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 27. doi: 10.1037/a0028756.Google Scholar

Lammers, J., Galinsky, A. D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2008). Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psychological Science, 19(6), 558–564.Google Scholar

Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Chapter 8: Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.Google Scholar

Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 158–186. doi: 10.1177/1088868312472732.Google Scholar

Maner, J. K., & Mead, N. L. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 482–497. doi: 10.1037/A0018559.Google Scholar

Mast, M. S., Jonas, K., & Hall, J. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 835–850. doi: 10.1037/A0016234.Google Scholar

Matanda, T., & Ewing, M. T. (2012). The process of global brand strategy development and regional implementation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(1), 5–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.11.002.Google Scholar

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. doi: 10.1037/h0040525.Google Scholar

Mourali, M., & Nagpal, A. (2013). The powerful select, the powerless reject: Power's influence in decision strategies. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 874–880. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.005.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E. & Briñol, P. (2012). The elaboration likelihood model. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A., & Higgins, E. T. (eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (vol. 1, pp. 224–245). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Leonard, B. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., Dubois, D., & Galinksy, A. D. (2011). Generous paupers and stingy princes: Power drives consumer spending on self versus others. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 1015–1029.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 257–267. doi: 10.1086/588569.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 549–555. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.005.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Dubois, D. (2012). Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 352–368. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.06.001.Google Scholar

Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526–537.CrossRef Google Scholar

Snyder, M., & DeBono, K. G. (1985). Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 586–597. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.49.3.586.Google Scholar

Torelli, C. J., & Shavitt, S. (2010). Culture and concepts of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 703–723. doi: 10.1037/A0019973.Google Scholar

Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social-behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506–520. doi: 10.1037/0033–295x.96.3.506.Google Scholar

Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36–51.Google Scholar

Worchel, S., Arnold, S. E., & Harrison, W. (1978). Aggression and power restoration: The effects of identifiability and timing on aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(1), 43–52.Google Scholar

Zhong, C. B., Magee, J. C., Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, culture, and action: Considerations in the expression and enactment of power in East Asian and Western societies. Research on managing groups and teams, 9, 53–73.Google Scholar

Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). On the ethics of intervention in human psychological research: With special reference to the Stanford prison experiment. Cognition, 2(2), 243–256. doi: 10.1016/0010–0277(72)90014-5.Google Scholar

Zimbardo, P. G. (1974). Obedience to authority. American Psychologist, 29(7), 566–567. doi: 10.1037/H0038158.Google Scholar

Adams, G. (2005). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Enemyship in North American and West African worlds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 948–968.Google Scholar

Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, white women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592.Google Scholar

Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005). How much do we care about the absolute versus relative income and consumption? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 56(3), 405–421.Google Scholar

Amaldoss, W., & Jain, S. (2005). Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 30–42.Google Scholar

Amaldoss, W., & Jain, S. (2007). Conspicuous consumption and sophisticated thinking. Management Science, 51(10), 1449–1466.Google Scholar

Anderson, C., & Brown, C. E., (2010). The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 55–89.Google Scholar

Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 491–503.Google Scholar

Arndt, J., Sheldon, K. M., Solomon, S., & Kasser, T. (2004). The urge to splurge: A terror management account of materialism and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3), 225–229.Google Scholar

Aspers, P., & Godart, F. (2013). Sociology of fashion: Order and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 171–192.Google Scholar

Bagwell, L. S., & Bernheim, B. D. (1996). Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. American Economic Review, 86(3), 349–373.Google Scholar

Ball, S., Eckel, C., Grossman, P. J., & Zame, W. (2001). Status in markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 161–188.Google Scholar

Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2007). The economic lives of the poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 141–167.Google Scholar

Bellezza, S., Gino, F., & Keinan, A. (2014). The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(June), 35–54.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity-signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2008). Who drives divergence? Identity-signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 593–607.Google Scholar

Berger, J., Ho, B., & Joshi, Y. (2011). Identity signaling with social capital: A model of symbolic consumption. Working Paper, Social Science Resource Network (SSRN).Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Fisek, M. H. (2006). Diffuse status characteristics and the spread of status value: A formal theory. American Journal of Sociology, 111(4), 1038–1079.Google Scholar

Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Zelditch, M., & Norman, R. Z. (1977). Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Ward, M. (2010). Subtle signals of inconspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), 555–569.Google Scholar

Berger, J., Zelditch, M., & Rosenholtz, S. J. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508.Google Scholar

Berry, S. T. (1994). Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. RAND Journal of Economics, 25(2), 242–262.Google Scholar

Blau, P. M. (1955). Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Bliege Bird, R., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46(2), 221–248.Google Scholar

Bloch, F., Desai, S., & Rao, V. (2004). Wedding celebrations as conspicuous consumption: Signaling social status in rural India. Journal of Human Resources, 39(3), 675–695.Google Scholar

Bobak, M., Pikhart, H., Hertzman, C., Rose, R., & Marmot, M. (1998). Socioeconomic factors, perceived control, and self-reported health in Russia: A cross-sectional survey. Social Science & Medicine, 47(2), 269–279.Google Scholar

Bodner, R., & Prelec, D. (2003). Self-signaling and diagnostic utility in everyday decision making. In Brocas, Isabelle and Carillo, Juan D. (eds.), Psychology of Economic Decisions (vol. 1, pp. 105–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boksem, M. A. S., Mehta, P. H., van den Bergh, B., van Son, V., Trautman, S. T., Roelofs, K., Smidts, A., & Sanfey, A. G. (2004). Testosterone inhibits trust but promotes reciprocity. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1–9.Google Scholar

Bothner, M., Podolny, J., & Smith, E. B. (2011). Organizing contests for status: The Matthew effect versus the Mark effect. Management Science, 57(3), 439–457Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (Nice, R., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Burroughs, J. E., Chaplin, L. N., Pandelaere, M., Norton, M., Ordabayeva, N., Gunz, A., & Dinauer, L. (2013). Using motivation theory to develop a transformative consumer research agenda for reducing materialism in society. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 32(1), 18–31.Google Scholar

Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2012). What welfare? The mission of transformative consumer research and the foundational role of materialism. In Pechmann, C., Mick, D., Ozanne, J, & Pettigrew, S. (eds.), Transformative Consumer Research for Personal and Collective Well Being (pp. 249–266). Mahwah, NJ: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 219–229.Google Scholar

Chang, L. C., & Arkin, R. M. (2002). Materialism as an attempt to cope with uncertainty. Psychology & Marketing, 19(5), 389–406.Google Scholar

Chao, A., & Schor, J. B. (1998). Empirical tests of status consumption: Evidence from women's cosmetics. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(1), 107–131.Google Scholar

Charles, K. K., Hurst, E., & Roussanov, N. (2009). Conspicuous consumption and race. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 425–467.Google Scholar

Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125.Google Scholar

Christen, M., & Morgan, R. M. (2005). Keeping up with the Joneses: Analyzing the effect of income inequality on consumer borrowing. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 3, 145–173.Google Scholar

Christensen, V. (1998). Fishery-induced changes in a marine ecosystem: Insights for models of the Gulf of Thailand. Journal of Fish Biology, 53(Supplement A), 128–142.Google Scholar

Chua, R. Y. J., & Zou, X. (2009). The devil wears Prada? Effects of exposure to luxury goods on cognition and decision making. Working Paper, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar

Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. (1998). Comparison-concave utility and following behaviour in social and economic settings. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 133–150.Google Scholar

Cronk, L. (2005). The application of animal signaling theory to human phenomena: Some thoughts and clarifications. Social Science Information, 44(4), 603–620.Google Scholar

de Botton, A. (2004). Status Anxiety. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar

Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2012). Self-signaling and the costs and benefits of temptation in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(1), 15–25.Google Scholar

Diamond, J. M. (1997). Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Drèze, X., & Nunes, J. C. (2009). Feeling superior: The impact of loyalty program structure on consumers’ perceptions of status. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(April), 890–905.Google Scholar

Dubois, D., & Anik, L. (2014). Heels, status and power: Consequences of status consumption for thoughts. Working Paper, INSEAD.Google Scholar

Dubois, B., Czellar, S., & Laurent, G. (2005). Consumer segments based on attitudes toward luxury: Empirical evidence from twenty countries. Marketing Letters, 16(2), 115–112.Google Scholar

Dubois, B., & Duquesne, P. (1993). The market for luxury goods: Income versus culture. European Journal of Marketing, 27(1), 35–44.Google Scholar

Dubois, D., Galinsky, A. D., & Rucker, D. D. (2010). The accentuation bias: Money literally looms larger (and sometimes smaller) to the powerless. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 199–205.Google Scholar

Dubois, D., Galinsky, A. D., & Rucker, D. D. (2012). Super size me: Product size as a signal of status. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1047–1062.Google Scholar

Duesenberry, J. (1949). Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dumont, L. (1966). Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Dupor, B., & Liu, W. (2003). Jealousy and equilibrium overconsumption. American Economic Review, 93(1), 423–8.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. 1893/1997. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Dynan, K. E., Skinner, J., & Zeldes, S. P. (2004). Do the rich save more? Journal of Political Economy, 112(2), 397–444.Google Scholar

Economist (2007). Ghana: Bankruptcy and burials. May 24.Google Scholar

Faddegon, K., Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2008). If we have the will, there will be a way: Regulatory focus as a group identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(5), 880–895.Google Scholar

Fan, E. T., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (1998). When needs outweigh desires: The effects of resource interdependence and reward interdependence on group problem solving. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20(1), 45–56.Google Scholar

Fast, N., Halevy, J. & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). The destructive nature of power without status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 391–394.Google Scholar

Ferraro, R., Kirmani, A., & Matherly, T. (2013). Look at me! Look at me! Conspicuous brand usage, self-brand connection, and dilution. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 477–488.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T. (2010). The Handbook of Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Fontes, A., & Fan, J. X. (2006). The effects of ethnic identity on household budget allocation to status conveying goods. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27(4), 643–663.Google Scholar

Frank, D., Wertenbroch, K., & Maddux, W. W. (2013). Fruits of labor or luck? Cultural differences in just world beliefs explain preferences for economic redistribution. Working Paper, INSEAD.Google Scholar

Frank, R. H. (1985). The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. American Economic Review, 75(March), 101–116.Google Scholar

Frank, R. H. (2007). Falling Behind: How Rising Inequality Harms the Middle Class. Oakland: California University Press.Google Scholar

Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (1995). The Winner-Take-All Society: Why the Few at the Top Get So Much More than the Rest of Us. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E., Schreier, M., & Dahl, D. W. (2013). All that is users might not be gold: How labeling products as user-designed backfires in the context of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Marketing, 77(5), 75–91.Google Scholar

Gardner, W. L., Lee, A. Y., & Gabriel, S. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10(4), 321–326.Google Scholar

Godart, F., & Mears, A. (2009). How do cultural producers make creative decisions? Lessons from the catwalk. Social Forces, 88(2), 671–692.Google Scholar

Godart, F., Shipilov, A., & Claes, K. (2014). Making the most of the revolving door: The impact of outward personnel mobility networks on organizational creativity, Organization Science, 25(2), 377–400.Google Scholar

Godoy, R., Seyfried, C., Reyes-Garcia, V., Tanner, S., McDade, T., Huanca, T., & Leonard, W. R. (2007). Signaling by consumption in a native Amazonian society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(2), 124–134.Google Scholar

Goodman, E., Huang, B., Adler, N. E., & Schafer-Kalkhoff, T. (2007). Perceived socioeconomic status: A new type of identity that influences adolescents’ self-rated health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(5), 479–487.Google Scholar

Greer, L. L., & Caruso, H. M. (2007). Are high power teams really high performers? The roles of trust and status congruency in high power team performance. Academy of Management Proceedings.Google Scholar

Griskevicius, V., Delton, A. W., Tybur, J. M., & Robertson, T. E. (2011). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1015–1026.Google Scholar

Griskevicius, V., Kenrick, D. T., Miller, G. F., Sundie, J. M., Tybur, J. M., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 85–102.Google Scholar

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.Google Scholar

Griskevicius, V., White, A. E., Delton, A. W., Ackerman, J. M., Tybur, J. M., & Robertson, T. E. (2012). The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 69–80.Google Scholar

Gruenfeld, D. H., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2010). Organizational preferences and their consequences. In Aronson, E., & Garner, L. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 249–266). Oxford: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C., & Dréze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 15–30.Google Scholar

Hardy, C. L., & van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1402–1413,Google Scholar

Heine, S. J., Takemoto, T., Moskalenko, S., Lasaleta, J., & Henrich, J. (2008). Mirrors in the head: Cultural variation in objective self-awareness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 879–887.Google Scholar

Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred status as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22,165–196Google Scholar

Henry, P. J. (2009). Low-status compensation: A theory for understanding the role of status in cultures of honor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 451–466.Google Scholar

Hill, S. E., Rodeheffer, C. D., Griskevicius, V., Durante, K., & White, A. E. (2012). Boosting beauty in an economic decline: Mating, spending, and the lipstick effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 275–291.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15–41.Google Scholar

Hopkins, E., & Kornienko, T. (2004). Running to keep in the same place: Consumer choice as a game status. American Economic Review, 94(4), 1085–1107.Google Scholar

Huang, L., Galinsky, A., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Guillory, L. E. (2011). Powerful postures versus powerful roles: Which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior? Psychological Science, 22(1), 95–102.Google Scholar

Huberman, B. A., Onculer, A., & Loch, C. H. (2004). Status as a valued resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(1), 103–114.Google Scholar

Humphreys, A., & Latour, K. A. (2013). Framing the game: Assessing the impact of cultural representations on consumer perceptions of legitimacy. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 773–795.Google Scholar

Ireland, N. J. (1994). On limiting the market for status signals. Journal of Public Economics, 53(1), 91–110.Google Scholar

Ivanic, A., & Nunes, J. C. (2009). The intrinsic benefits of status. Working Paper, University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Ivanic, A. S., Overbeck, J., & Nunes, J. C. (2011). Status, race and money: The impact of racial hierarchy on willingness to pay. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1557–1566.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. E., Finkel, E. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2011). Middle class and marginal? Socioeconomic status, stigma, and self-regulation at an elite university. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 838–852.Google Scholar

Kamakura, W. A., & Du, R. Y. (2012). How economic contractions and expansions affect expenditure patterns. Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (2), 229–247.Google Scholar

Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. M. (2000). Of wealth and death: Materialism, mortality salience, and consumption behavior. Psychological Science, 11(4), 348–351.Google Scholar

Keltner, D., Van Kleef, G. A., Kraus, M. W., & Chen, S. (2008). A reciprocal influence model of social power: Emerging principles and lines of inquiry. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 151-192.Google Scholar

Kim, C. J., Park, B. S., & Dubois, D. (2014). Climbing up vs. not sliding down? The impact of political ideology on luxury consumption. Working Paper, INSEAD.Google Scholar

Knell, M. (1999). Social comparisons, inequality, and growth. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155(4), 664–695.Google Scholar

Kraus, M. W., Keltner, D., Rheinschmidt, M. L., Piff, P. K., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2012a). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572.Google Scholar

Kraus, M. W., Keltner, D., Stellar, J. E., & Manzo, V. M. (2012b). Class and compassion: Socioeconomic factors predict responses to suffering. Emotion, 12(3), 449–459.Google Scholar

Kuksov, D., & Xie, Y. (2012). Competition in a status goods market. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 609–623.Google Scholar

Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423Google Scholar

Leavitt, H. J. (2005). Hierarchies, authority and leadership. Leader to Leader, 2005(37), 55–61.Google Scholar

Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012). Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 530–544.Google Scholar

Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2013). Self-threats and consumption. In Ruvio, Ayalla A. and Belk, Russell W. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Identity and Consumption (pp. 216–224) New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 183–207.Google Scholar

Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117–124.Google Scholar

Lincoln, G.A., Guinness, F., & Short, R. V. (1972). The way in which testosterone controls the social and sexual behavior of the red deer stag (cervus elaphus). Hormones and Behavior, 3(4), 375–396.Google Scholar

Lovett, M. J., Peres, R., & Shachar, R. (2013). On brands and word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 427–444.Google Scholar

MacCracken, G. D. (1988). Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Magee, J. C. (2009). Seeing power in action: The roles of deliberation, implementation, and action in inferences of power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.Google Scholar

Mandel, N., & Heine, S. J. (1999). Terror management and marketing: He who dies with the most toys wins. In Arnould, E. J, & Scott, L. (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research 26. Duluth, MN: ACR, 527-532.Google Scholar

Mandel, N., Petrova, P. K., & Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Images of success and the preference for luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(1), 57–69.Google Scholar

Maner, J. K., Eckel, L. A., Schmidt, N. B., & Miller, S. L. (2010). The endocrinology of exclusion: Rejection elicits motivationally tuned changes in progesterone. Psychological Science, 21(4), 581–588.Google Scholar

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 568–579.Google Scholar

Marmot, M. G. (2004). The Endocrinology of Exclusion: Rejection Elicits Motivationally Tuned Changes in Progesterone. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Marmot, M. G., Feeney, A., Patel, C., Brunner, E., North, F., Smith, G. D., & Head, J. (1991). Health inequalities among British civil servants: The Whitehall II Study. Lancet, 337(June), 1387–1397.Google Scholar

Masling, J., Greer, F. L., & Gilmore, R. (1955). Status, authoritarianism and sociometric choice. Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 297–310.Google Scholar

Mazzocco, P. J., Galinsky, A. D., Rucker, D. D., & Anderson, E. T. (2012). Direct and vicarious conspicuous consumption: Identification with low-status groups increases the desire for high-status goods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 520–528.Google Scholar

McFerran, B., & Argo, J. J. (2013). The entourage effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 871–884.Google Scholar

Miller, G. F. (2009). Spent: Sex, Evolution, and Consumer Behavior. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Milner, M. (1994). Status and Sacredness: A General Theory of Status Relations and an Analysis of Indian Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moav, O., & Neeman, Z. (2008). Conspicuous consumption, human capital and poverty. Discussion Paper No. 6864, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London EC1V 7RR, UK.Google Scholar

Nelissen, R. M. A., & Meijers, M. H. C. (2011). Social benefits of luxury brands as costly signals of wealth and status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(5), 343–355.Google Scholar

Nelson, E. E., Pine, D. S., Leibenluft, E., & McClure, E. B. (2005). The social re-orientation of adolescence: A neuroscience perspective on the process and its relation to psychopathology. Psychological Medicine, 35(2), 163–174.Google Scholar

Nelson, P. D., & Berry, N. H. (1965). Change in sociometric status during military basic training related to performance two years later. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 61(2), 251–255.Google Scholar

Nunes, J. C., Drèze, X., & Young, J. (2011). Conspicuous consumption in a recession: Toning it down or turning it up? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 199–205.Google Scholar

Ordabayeva, N., & Chandon, P. (2011). Getting ahead of the Joneses: When equality increases conspicuous consumption among bottom-tier consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 27–41.Google Scholar

Patrick, V., & Prokopec, S. (2012). Can a successful brand extension dilute a luxury brand? How managing the “dream” matters. Working Paper, SSRN.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 382–407.Google Scholar

Piff, P. K., Keltner, D., Stancato, D. M., Cote, S., & Mendoza-Denton, R. (2011). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(11), 4086–4091.Google Scholar

Piff, P. K., Cheng, B. H., Kraus, M. W., Keltner, D., & Cote, S. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784.Google Scholar

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21^st Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Plourde, A. (2008). The origins of prestige goods as honest signals of skill and knowledge. Human Nature, 19(4), 374–388.Google Scholar

Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 829–872.Google Scholar

Podolny, J. M. (2005). Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pomeroy, S. B., Roberts, J. T., Burstein, S. M., & Donlan, W. (2004). A brief history of ancient Greece: Politics, society, and culture. Classical Review, 56(1), 146–148.Google Scholar

Prasse, K. G. (1995). The Tuaregs: The Blue People. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar

Prelec, D., & Bodner, R. (2003). Self-signaling and self-control. In Read, D., Lowenstein, G., & Baumeister, R. (eds.), Time and Decision (pp. 277–298). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review, 106(4), 835–845.Google Scholar

Ridgeway, C. L., Tinkler, J. E., Backor, K., Erickson, K. G., & Li, Y. E. (2009). How easily does a social difference become a status distinction? Gender matters. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 44–62.Google Scholar

Ridgeway, C. L., & Walker, H (1995). Status structures. In Cook, K., Fine, G., & House, J. (eds.), Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology. New York: Allyn and Bacon, 281-310.Google Scholar

Rindfleisch, A., Burroughs, J. E., & Wong, N. (2009). The safety of objects: Materialism, existential insecurity, and brand connection. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1), 1–16.Google Scholar

Rindfleisch, A., Denton, F., & Burroughs, J. E. (1997). Family structure, materialism, and compulsive consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(4), 312–325.Google Scholar

Rivers, J. J., & Josephs, R. A. (2010). Dominance and health: The role of social rank in physiology and illness. In Guinote, A., & Vescio, T. K. (eds.), The Social Psychology of Power. New York: Guilford Press, 87-112.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., Dubois, D. & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Generous paupers and stingy princes: Power drives spending on one's self versus others. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(7), 1015–1029.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 257–267.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. (2009). Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer consumption. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 549–555.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. (2013). Compensatory Consumption. In Belk, Russell W. and Ruvio, Ayalla A. (eds.), New York: Routledge, 207–15.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D. & Dubois, D., (2012). Power and consumer behavior: Power shapes who and what we value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 352–368.Google Scholar

Saad, G. (2007). The Evolutionary Bases of Consumption. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Sauder, M. (2006). Third parties and status position: How the characteristics of status systems matter. Theory and Society, 35(3), 299–321.Google Scholar

Sapolsky, R. M. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308(5722), 648–652.Google Scholar

Schmid Mast, M., & Hall, J. A. (2004). Who is boss and who is not? Accuracy of judging status. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28(3), 145–165.Google Scholar

Scitovsky, T. (1992). The Joyless Economy: The Psychology of Human Satisfaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, M. L., Bolton, L. E., & Mende, M. (2013). Judging the book by its cover? How consumers decode conspicuous consumption cues in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(3), 334–347.Google Scholar

Shalev, E., & Morwitz, V. G. (2012). Influence via comparison-driven self-evaluation and restoration: The case of the low-status influencer. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 964–980.Google Scholar

Sharma, E., & Alter, A. L. (2012). Financial deprivation prompts consumers to seek scarce goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 545–560.Google Scholar

Shavit, S., Lalwani, A. K., Torelli, C. J., & Zhang, J. (2006). The horizontal/vertical distinction in cross-cultural consumer research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 325–356.Google Scholar

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simmel, G. (1094/1957). Fashion. American Journal of Sociology, 62(6), 541–558.Google Scholar

Sligte, D. J., Nijstad, B. A., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2011). Power, stability of power, and creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 891–897.Google Scholar

Solnick, S. J., & Hemenway, D. (1998). Is more always better? A survey about positional goods. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 37(3), 373–383.Google Scholar

Stellar, J. E., Keltner, D., Kraus, M. W., & Manzo, V. M. (2012). Class and compassion: Socioeconomic factors predict responses to suffering. Emotion, 12(3), 449–459.Google Scholar

Stilley, K., Nenkov, G. Y., & Winterich, K. P. (2011). You spend, I spend, but you save, I save: Effects of deliberative mindsets and social comparison on financial decisions. In Dahl, D. W., Johar, G. V., & van Osselaer, S. M. J. (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, 38. Duluth, MN: ACR.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. (1984). The Social Dimension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E. (1981). Pre- to post-election shifts in presidential rhetoric: Impression management or cognitive adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 207−212.Google Scholar

Thompson, S. H., Corwin, S. J., & Sargent, R. G. (1997). Ideal body size beliefs and weight concerns of fourth-grade children. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 21(3), 279–284.Google Scholar

Thompson, W. E., & Hickey, J. V. (2005). Society in Focus. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Tiedens, L. Z., Young, M. J., & Unzueta, M. M. (2007). An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 402–414.Google Scholar

Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623–1626.Google Scholar

Van Boven, L., Campbell, M. C., & Gilovich, T. (2010). Stigmatizing materialism: On stereotypes and impressions of materialistic and experiential pursuits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(4), 551–563.Google Scholar

Van der Vegt, G. S., Oosterhof, A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2006). Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 877–893.Google Scholar

Van Vugt, M. (2006). Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 354–371.Google Scholar

Van Vugt, M., Kaiser, R. B., & Hogan, R. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63(3), 182–196.Google Scholar

Veblen, T. B. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institution. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wang, Y., & Griskevicius, V. (2014). Conspicuous consumption, relationships, and rivals: Women's luxury products as signals to other women. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 834–854.Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1922) 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Weber, M., Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilcox, K., Kim, H. M., & Sen, S. (2009). Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands? Journal of Marketing Research, 46(2), 247–259.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Willer, R. (2009). A status theory of collective action. In Lawler, E. & Thye, S. R. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes (vol. 26, pp. 133–163). Bingley, England: Emerald.Google Scholar

Zhu, N. (2012). Household consumption and personal bankruptcy. Journal of Legal Studies, 40(1), 1–37.Google Scholar

Zizzo, D. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Are people willing to pay to reduce others’ incomes? Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, 63–64 (July–December), 39–62.Google Scholar

Akpinar, Ezgi, & Berger, Jonah (2014). Valuable virality. Wharton Working Paper.Google Scholar

Allport, Gordon W., & Postman, Leo (1947). The Psychology of Rumor. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Anderson, John R. (1974). Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 451–474.Google Scholar

Anderson, John R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, Eugene W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 5–17.Google Scholar

Aral, Sinan, & Walker, Dylan (2012). Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science, 337(6092), 337–341.Google Scholar

Aral, Sinan, Muchnik, Lev, & Sundararajan, Arum (2009). Distinguishing influence based contagion from homophily driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(51): 21544–21549.Google Scholar

Bakshy, Eytan, Rosenn, Itamar, Marlow, Cameron, & Adamic, Lada (2012). The Role of Social Networks in Information Diffusion. Paper presented at the 21st ACM World Wide Web Conference. Lyon, France, April, 16–20.Google Scholar

Barasch, Alix, & Berger, Jonah (2014). Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size impacts what people share. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(3), 286–299.Google Scholar

Barsade, Sigal G., & Gibson, Donald E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 36–59.Google Scholar

Basuroy, Suman, Chatterjee, Subimal, & Ravid, S. Abraham (2003). How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets. Journal of Marketing, 67, 103–117.Google Scholar

Baumeister, Roy. F., & Leary, Mark R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.Google Scholar

Baumeister, Roy F., Zhang, Liqing, & Vohs, Kathleen D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8, 111–121.Google Scholar

Bearden, William O., Netemeyer, Richard G., & Teel, Jesse E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 473–481.Google Scholar

Belk, Russell W. (1978). Occurrence of Word of Mouth Buyer Behavior as a Function of Situation and Advertising Stimuli. In Allvine, Fred C. (ed.), Proceedings of the American Marketing Association's Educators Conference (pp. 419–422). Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar

Belk, Russell W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(September), 139–167.Google Scholar

Berger, Jonah (2011). Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science, 22(7), 891–893.Google Scholar

Berger, Jonah (2014a). Beyond viral: Social transmission in the Internet age. Psychological Inquiry, 24, 293-296.Google Scholar

Berger, Jonah (2014b). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586–607.Google Scholar

Berger, Jonah, & Heath, Chip (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity-signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134.Google Scholar

Berger, Jonah, & Heath, Chip (2008). Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 593–607.Google Scholar

Berger, Jonah, & Iyengar, Raghuram (2013). Communication channels and word of mouth: How the medium shapes the message. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 567–579.Google Scholar

Berger, Jonah, & Milkman, Katherine (2012). What makes online content viral. Journal of Marketing, 49(2), 192–205.Google Scholar

Berger, Jonah, & Schwartz, Eric (2011). What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 869–880.Google Scholar

Berger, Jonah, Sorensen, Alan T., & Rasmussen, Scott J. (2010). Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Science, 29(5), 815–827.Google Scholar

Berlo, David K. (1960). The Process of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar

Bond, Robert M., Fariss, Christopher J., Jones, Jason J., Kramer, Adam D. I., Marlow, Cameron, Settle, Jaime E., & Fowler, James H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489, 295–298.Google Scholar

Brock, Timothy C. (1965). Communicator-recipient similarity and decision change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(6), 650–654.Google Scholar

Brooks, Alison Wood, & Schweitzer, Maurice E.. (2011)Can nervous Nelly negotiate? How anxiety causes negotiators to make low first offers, exit early, and earn less profit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 43–54.Google Scholar

Brown, Jacqueline Johnson, & Reingen, Peter H. (1987). Social ties and word of mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350–362.Google Scholar

Brunvand, Jan H. (1981). The Vanishing Hitchhiker: American Urban Legends and Their Meanings. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Buechel, Eva, & Berger, Jonah (2014). Facebook therapy: Why people share self-relevant content online. Working Paper, University of Miami.Google Scholar

Bui, Khanh-Van T., Raven, Bertram H., & Schwarzwald, Joseph (1994). Influence strategies in dating relationships: The effects of relationship satisfaction, gender, and perspective. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 429–442.Google Scholar

Burt, Ronald S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.Google Scholar

Centola, Damon (2010). The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329(5996), 1194–1197.Google Scholar

Centola, Damon and Macy, Michael (2007). Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 702–34.Google Scholar

Chan, Cindy, & Berger, Jonah (2013). Arousal and social connection. Working Paper, Wharton.Google Scholar

Cheema, Amar, & Kaikati, Andrew M. (2010). The effect of need for uniqueness on word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 553–563.Google Scholar

Chen, Zoey, & Berger, Jonah (2013). When, why, and how controversy causes conversation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 580–593.Google Scholar

Chen, Zoey, & Lurie, Nicholas (2014). Temporal contiguity and the negativity bias in the impact of online word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 463–476.Google Scholar

Chevalier, Judith A., & Mayzlin, Dina (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 345–354.Google Scholar

Chintagunta, Pradeep K., Gopinath, Shyam, & Venkataraman, Sriram (2010). The effects of online user reviews on movie box-office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Science, 29(5), 944–957.Google Scholar

Chiu, H-C., Hsieh, Y-C., Kao, Y-H., & Lee, M. (2007). The determinants of email receivers’ dissemiating behaviors on the Internet. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 524–534.Google Scholar

Christie, Israel C., & Friedman, Bruce H. (2004). Autonomic specificity of discrete emotion and dimensions of affective space: A multivariate approach. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 51, 143–153.Google Scholar

Chung, Cindy, & Darke, Peter (2006). The consumer as advocate: Self-relevance, culture, and word of mouth. Marketing Letters, 17(4), 269–279.Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clemons, Erik K., Gao, Guodong, & Hitt, Lorin (2006). When online reviews meet hyper differentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 149–171.Google Scholar

Cohen, Sheldon, & Lichtenstein, Edward (1990). Partner behaviors that support quitting smoking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 304–309.Google Scholar

Collins, Allan M., & Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428.Google Scholar

Das, Sauvik, & Kramer, Adam (2013). Self-censorship on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Usable Privacy (SOUP). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar

Davidson, Richard J. (1993). Parsing affective space: Perspectives from neuropsychology and psychophysiology. Neuropsychology, 7(4), 464–475.Google Scholar

De Angelis, Matteo, Bonezzi, Andrea, Peluso, Alessandro, Rucker, Derek, & Costabile, Michele (2012). On braggarts and gossips: A self-enhancement account of word of mouth generation and transmission. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(4), 551–563.Google Scholar

Dellarocas, Chrysanthos, & Narayan, Ritu (2006). A statistical measure of a population's propensity to engage in post-purchase online word of mouth. Statistical Science, 21(2), 277–285.Google Scholar

Dellarocas, Chrysanthos, Zhang, Xiaoquan, & Awad, Neveen (2007). Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 23.Google Scholar

Denrell, J., & Le Mens, G. (2007). Interdependent sampling and social influence. Psychological Review, 114(2), 398–422.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Morton, & Gerard, Harold B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636.Google Scholar

Dhar, Vasant, & Chang, Elaine (2009). Does chatter matter? The impact of user-generated content on music sales. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(4), 300–307.Google Scholar

Dichter, Ernest (1966). How word of mouth advertising works. Harvard Business Review, 44, 147–166.Google Scholar

Duan, Wenjing, Gu, Bin, & Whinston, Andrew B. (2008). The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales: An empirical investigation of the movie industry. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 233–242.Google Scholar

Dubois, David, Bonezzi, Andrea, & De Angelis, Matteo (2013). The dangers of strong ties: How interpersonal closeness influences word of mouth valence. Working Paper, INSEAD.Google Scholar

Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Tormala, Z. L. (2011). From rumors to facts, and facts to rumors: The role of certainty decay in consumer communications. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 1020–1032.Google Scholar

Du Plessis, Christilene, & Dubois, David (2014). La vie en rose at the top? Why positive (negative) information goes up (down) in a hierarchy. Working Paper, INSEAD.Google Scholar

Dunbar, Robin (1998). Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dunbar, Robin (2004). The Human Story. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Duthler, Kirk W. (2006). The politeness of requests made via email and voicemail: Support for the hyperpersonal model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(6), 500–521.Google Scholar

East, Robert, Hammond, Kathy, Lomax, Wendy, & Robinson, Helen (2005). What is the effect of a recommendation? Marketing Review, 5, 145–157.Google Scholar

East, Robert, Hammond, Kathy, & Wright, Malcolm (2007). The relative incidence of positive and negative word of mouth: A multi-category study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(2), 175–184.Google Scholar

Engel, James E., Blackwell, Roger D., & Kegerreis, Robert J. (1969). How information is used to adopt an innovation. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(4), 3–8.Google Scholar

Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1993). Consumer Behavior, 7th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press.Google Scholar

Escalas, Jennifer E., & Bettman, James R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339–348.Google Scholar

Fast, Nathanael J., Heath, Chip, & Wu, George (2009). Common ground and cultural prominence: How conversation reinforces culture. Psychological Science, 20, 904–911.Google Scholar

Fehr, Ernst, Kirchsteiger, Georg, & Riedl, Arno (1998). Gift exchange and reciprocity in competitive experimental markets. European Economic Review, 42(1), 1–34.Google Scholar

Feick, Lawrence F., & Price, Linda L. (1987). The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. Journal of Marketing, 51(January), 83–97.Google Scholar

Feldman, Jack M., & Lynch, John G. Jr. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421–435.Google Scholar

Finkenauer, Catrin, & Rime, Bernard (1998). Socially shared emotional experiences vs. emotional experiences kept secret: Differential characteristics and consequences. Journal of Social Clinical Psychology, 17, 295–318.Google Scholar

Fitzsimons, Gavan J., & Lehmann, Donald R. (2004). Reactance to recommendations: When unsolicited advice yields contrary responses. Marketing Science, 23(March–April), 82–94.Google Scholar

Folkes, V. S., & Sears, D. O. (1977). Does everybody like a liker? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 505–519.Google Scholar

Forman, Chris, Ghose, Anindya, & Wiesenfeld, Batia (2008). Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 291–313.Google Scholar

Friestad, Marian, & Wright, Peter (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(June), 1–31.Google Scholar

Frenzen, Jonathan, & Nakamoto, Kent (1993). Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 360–375.Google Scholar

Gable, Shelly L., Reis, Harry T., Impett, Emily A., & Asher, Evan R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228–245.Google Scholar

Gaertner, Samuel L., & Dovidio, John F. (1977). The subtlety of white racism, arousal, and helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 691–707.Google Scholar

Godes, David (2011). Invited comment on “opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion.” Marketing Science, 30(2), 224–229.Google Scholar

Godes, David, & Mayzlin, Dina (2004). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23(4), 545–560.Google Scholar

Godes, David, & Mayzlin, Dina (2009). Firm-created word of mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Science, 28(4), 721–739.Google Scholar

Godes, David, & Silva, Jose (2012) The dynamics of online opinion. Working Paper.Google Scholar

Goldenberg, Jacob, Libai, Barak, & Muller, Eitan (2001). Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word of mouth. Marketing Letters, 12(3), 209–221.Google Scholar

Granovetter, Mark S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar

Gross, James J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.Google Scholar

Gross, James J. (2008). Emotion regulation. In Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (eds.), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 497–512). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hauser, John R. (1978). Testing the accuracy, usefulness, and significance of probabilistic models: An information-theoretic approach. Operation Research Society of America, 26(3), 406–421.Google Scholar

Heath, Chip, Bell, Chris, & Sternberg, Emily (2001). Emotional selection in memes: The case of urban legends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1028–1041.Google Scholar

Heath, Chip, & DeVoe, Sanford (2005). Extreme comparisons: Biased information flows and social comparison theory. Working Paper, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Heilman, Kenneth M. (1997). The neurobiology of emotional experience. Journal of Neuropsychiatry, 9, 439–448.Google Scholar

Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, Gwinner, Kevin, Walsh, Gianfranco, & Gremler, Dwayne (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.Google Scholar

Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, & Walsh, Gianfranco (2004). Electronic word of mouth: Consequences of and motives for reading customer articulations on the Internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 51–74.Google Scholar

Herr, Paul M., Kardes, Frank R., & Kim, John (1991). Effects of word of mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454–462.Google Scholar

Higgins, E. Tory, & King, Gillian (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability in personality, cognition, and social interaction. In Cantor, Nancy & Kihlstrom, John (eds.), Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction, Vol. 14 (pp. 621–635). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Higgins, E. Tory, Rholes, William S., & Jones, Carl R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Social Psychology, 13(2), 141–154.Google Scholar

Homans, George C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.Google Scholar

Hovland, Carl I., & Weiss, Walter (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Raghuram, Van den Bulte, Christophe, & Valente, Thomas W. (2011). Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Science, 30(2), 195–212.Google Scholar

Joshi, P., & Wakslak, C. J. (2013). Communicating with the crowd: Speakers use abstract messages when addressing larger audiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 351–362.Google Scholar

Kamins, M. A., Folkes, V. S., & Perner, L. (1997). Consumer responses to rumors: Good news, bad news. Journal of Consumer Psychology 6(2), 165–187.Google Scholar

Karmarkar, Uma R., & Tormala, Zakary L. (2010). Believe me, I have no idea what I'm talking about: The effects of source certainty on consumer involvement and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 46, 1033–1049.Google Scholar

Katz, Elihu, & Lazarsfeld, Paul F. (1955). Personal Influence. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Kirchler, Erich (1993). Spouses’ joint purchase decisions: Determinants of influence tactics for muddling through the process. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 405–438.Google Scholar

Kleine, Robert E. III, Kleine, Susan S., & Kernan, Jerome B. (1993). Mundane consumption and the self: A social identity perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(3), 209–235.Google Scholar

Landis, Howard, & Burtt, Harold E. (1924). A study of conversation. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 4(1), 81–89.Google Scholar

Langston, Christopher A. (1994). Capitalizing on and coping with daily-life events: Expressive responses to positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1112–1125.Google Scholar

Lasswell, Harold (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In Bryson, L. (ed.) The Communication of Ideas (pp. 117–129). New York: Institute for Religious and Social Studies.Google Scholar

Levy, Sidney J. (1959). Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review, 33(March–April), 117–24.Google Scholar

Li, Xinxin, & Hitt, Lorin M. (2008). Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 456–474.Google Scholar

Liu, Yong (2006). Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 74–89.Google Scholar

Lovett, Mitch, Peres, Renana, & Shachar, Roni (2013). On brands and word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 427–444.Google Scholar

Luminet, Olivier, Bouts, Patrick, Delie, Frederique, Manstead, Antony S.R., & Rime, Bernard (2000). Social sharing of emotion following exposure to a negatively valenced situation. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 661–688.Google Scholar

Luo, Xueming (2007). Consumer negative voice and firm-idiosyncratic stock returns. Journal of Marketing, 71, 75–88.Google Scholar

Luo, Xueming (2009). Quantifying the long-term impact of negative word of mouth on cash flow and stock prices. Marketing Science, 28(1), 148–165.Google Scholar

Lynch, John G., & Srull, Thomas K. (1982). Memory and attentional factors in consumer choice: Concepts and research methods. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 18–37.Google Scholar

Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Ogden, Christopher and Richards, Ivor Armstrong (eds.), The Meaning of Meaning, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

McKinsey, (2010). A new way to measure word of mouth marketing. McKinsey Quarterly, (April).Google Scholar

Moe, Wendy W., & Schweidel, David A. (2012). Online product opinion: Incidence, evaluation and evolution. Marketing Science, 31(3), 372–386.Google Scholar

Moe, Wendy W., & Trusov, Michael (2011). Measuring the value of social dynamics in online product forums. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 444–456.Google Scholar

Moldovan, Sarit, Goldenberg, Jacob, & Chattopadhyay, Amitava (2011). The different roles of product originality and usefulness in generating word of mouth. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28, 109–119.Google Scholar

Moldovan, Sarit, & Lehmann, Donald R. (2010). The effect of advertising on word of mouth. In Campbell, Margaret C., Inman, Jeff, & Pieters, Rik (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research (vol. 37, pp. 119–121). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar

Moldovan, Sarit, Steinhart, Yael, & Ofen, Shlomit (2012). Share and scare: Solving the communication dilemma of early adopters with a high need for uniqueness. Working Paper.Google Scholar

Moon, Sangkil, Bergey, Paul K., & Iacobucci, Dawn (2009). Dynamic effects among movie ratings, movie revenues, and viewer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 108–121.Google Scholar

Moore, Sarah G. (2012). Some things are better left unsaid: How word of mouth influences the storyteller. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1140–1154.Google Scholar

Moore, Sarah G., & McFerran, Brent (2012). Linguistic mimicry in online word of mouth. Working Paper, University of Alberta.Google Scholar

Moore, Sarah, Packard, Grant, & McFerran, Brent (2012). Do words speak louder than actions? Firm language in customer service interactions. Working Paper, University of Alberta.Google Scholar

Naylor, Rebecca Walker, Lamberton, Cait Poynor, & Norton, David A. (2011). Seeing ourselves in others: Reviewer ambiguity, egocentric anchoring, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 617–631.Google Scholar

Nedungadi, Prakash (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 263–276.Google Scholar

Onishi, Hiroshi, & Manchanda, Puneet (2012). Marketing activity, blogging and sales. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29, 221–234.Google Scholar

Park, C. Whan, & Lessig, V. Parker (1977). Students and housewives: Difference in susceptibility to reference group influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(2), 102–110.Google Scholar

Pasupathi, Monisha (1999). Age differences in response to conformity pressure for emotional and nonemotional material. Psychology and Aging, 14(1), 170–174.Google Scholar

Packard, Grant, Gershoff, Andy, & Wooten, David (2012). Is immodesty a vice when sharing advice? Consumer responses to self-enhancing sources of word of mouth information. Working Paper, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Packard, Grant, McFerran, Brent, & Moore, Sarah (2014). Putting the customer second: Personal pronoun use in customer-firm interactions. Working Paper, Laurier.Google Scholar

Packard, Grant, & Wooten, David B. (2013). Compensatory knowledge signaling in consumer word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 434–450.Google Scholar

Pennebaker, James W. (1999). The effects of traumatic disclosure on physical and mental health: The values of writing and talking about upsetting events. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 1(1), 9–18.Google Scholar

Pennebaker, James W., Zech, Emanuelle, & Rimé, Bernard (2001). Disclosing and sharing emotion: Psychological, social, and health consequences. In Stroebe, Margaret S., Hansson, Robert O., Stroebe, Wolfgang, & Schut, Henk (eds.), Handbook of Bereavement Research: Consequences, Coping, and Care (pp. 517–544). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Peters, Kim, & Kashima, Yoshihasa (2007). From social talk to social action: Shaping the social triad with emotion sharing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 780–797.Google Scholar

Peters, Kim, Kashima, Yoshihasa, & Clark, Anna (2009). Talking about others: Emotionality and the dissemination of social information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 207–222.Google Scholar

Petty, Richard E., & Wegner, Duane T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., & Lindzey, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology (vol. 1, pp. 323–390). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243–281.Google Scholar

Price, Linda L., Arnould, Eric J., & Deibler, Sheila L. (1995). Consumers’ Emotional responses to service encounters: The influence of the service provider. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(3), 34–63.Google Scholar

Rettie, Ruth (2009). SMS: Exploring the interactional characteristics of near-synchrony. Information, Communication, and Society, 12(8), 1131–1148.Google Scholar

Rimé, Bernard (2007). Interpersonal emotion regulation. In Gross, J. J. (ed.), Handbook of Emotion Regulation (pp. 466–485). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Rimé, Bernard (2009). Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1, 60–85.Google Scholar

Rimé, Bernard, Mesquita, Batja, Philippot, Pierre, & Boca, Stefano (1991). Beyond the emotional event: Six studies on the social sharing of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 435–465.Google Scholar

Roskos-Ewoldsen, David R. (1997). Implicit theories of persuasion. Human Communication Research, 24, 31–63.Google Scholar

Rosnow, Ralph L. (1980). Psychology of rumor reconsidered. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 578–591.Google Scholar

Rosnow, Ralph L., & Fine, Gary A. (1976). Rumor and Gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Schachter, S. (1959). The Psychology of Affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Philipp, Skiera, Gary A., & Van den Bulte, Christophe (2011). Referral programs and customer value. Journal of Marketing, 75, 46–59.Google Scholar

Schramm, W. (1954). How communication works. In Schramm, W. (ed.), The Process and Effects Of Communication (pp. 3–26). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Seltzer, L. J., Prososki, A. R., Ziegler, T. E., & Pollak, S. D. (2012). Instant messages versus human speech: Hormones and why we still need to hear each another. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(1), 42–45.Google Scholar

Shibutani, Tamotsu (1966). Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Siefert, Caleb J., Kothuri, Ravi, Jacobs, Devra B., Levine, Brian, Plummer, Joseph, & Marci, Carl D. (2009). Winning the Super “Buzz” Bowl. Journal of Advertising Research, 49(3), 293–303.Google Scholar

Stacey, E. Craig, Pauwels, Koen H., & Lackman, Andrew (2012). Beyond likes and tweets: How conversation content drives store and site traffic. Working Paper.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert C. (1978). Assertion. In Cole, P. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp. 315–332). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Stephen, Andrew T., & Galak, Jeff (2012). The effects of traditional and social earned media on sales: A study of a microlending marketplace. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(5), 624–639.Google Scholar

Stigler, George J. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213–225.Google Scholar

Sundaram, Dilip S., Mitra, Kaushik, & Webster, Cynthia (1998). Word of mouth communications: A motivational analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 527–531.Google Scholar

Tesser, A., & Campbell, J. (1982). Self-evaluation-maintenance and the perception of friends and strangers. Journal of Personality, 50, 261–279.Google Scholar

Tesser, A., & Paulhus, D. L. (1983). The definition of self: Private and public self-evaluation management strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 672–682.Google Scholar

Tesser, Abraham, & Rosen, Sidney (1975). The reluctance to transmit bad news. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 8, pp. 193–232). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Tost, Leigh Plunkett, Gino, Francesca, & Larrick, Richard P. (2012). Power, competitiveness, and advice taking: Why the powerful don't listen. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 53–65.Google Scholar

Trusov, Michael, Bucklin, Randolph E., & Pauwels, Koen (2009). Effects of word of mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 90–102.Google Scholar

Tucker, Catherine (2014). The reach and persuasiveness of viral video ads. Marketing Science, 32(2), 281–296.Google Scholar

Tucker, Joan S., & Mueller, Jennifer S. (2000). Spouses’ social control of health behaviors: Use and effectiveness of specific strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1120–1130.Google Scholar

Van Boven, Leaf, & Ashworth, Laurence (2007). Looking forward, looking back: Anticipation is more evocative than retrospection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 289–300.Google Scholar

Van den Bulte, Christophe, & Wuyts, Stefan (2009). Leveraging customer networks. In Wind, Jerry Yoram & Kleindorfer, Paul (eds.), The Network Challenge: Strategy, Profit and Risk in an Interlinked World (pp. 243–258). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar

Watts, Duncan J., & Dodds, Peter S. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441–458.Google Scholar

Wetzer, Inge M., Zeelenberg, Marcel, & Pieters, Rik (2007) Never eat in that restaurant, I did! Exploring why people engage in negative word of mouth communication. Psychology & Marketing, 24 (8), 661–680.Google Scholar

Wilson, Robert E., Gosling, Samuel D., & Graham, Lindsay T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203–220.Google Scholar

Woodside, Arch G., & Delozier, M. Wayne (1976). Effects of word of mouth advertising on consumer risk taking. Journal of Advertising, 5(4), 12–19.Google Scholar

Wyer, Robert S. Jr., & Srull, Thomas K. (1981). Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In Higgins, E. Tory, Herman, C. P., & Zanna, Mark P. (eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium (vol. 1, pp. 161–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Zhao, Min, & Xie, Jinhong (2011). Effects of social and temporal distance on consumers’ responses to peer recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 486–496.Google Scholar

Zhu, Feng, & Zhang, Xiaoquan (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74, 133–148.Google Scholar

Adams, G. S., Flynn, F. J., & Norton, M. I. (2012). The gifts we keep on giving: Documenting and destigmatizing the regifting taboo. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1145–1150.Google Scholar

Algoe, S. B., Haidt, J., & Gable, S. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8(3), 425.Google Scholar

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 241.Google Scholar

Babin, B. J., Gonzalez, C., & Watts, C. (2007). Does Santa have a great job? Gift shopping value and satisfaction. Psychology & Marketing, 24(10), 895–917.Google Scholar

Baskin, E., Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., & Novemsky, N. (2014). Why feasibility matters more to gift receivers than to givers: A construal-level approach to gift giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 169–182.Google Scholar

Belk, R. W. (1976). It’s the thought that counts: A signed digraph analysis of gift-giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 155–162.Google Scholar

Belk, R. W. (1979). Gift-giving behavior. In Sheth, Jagdish N. (ed.), Research in Marketing (vol. 2, pp. 95–126). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Belk, R. W. (1996). The perfect gift. In Otnes, Cele and Beltramini, Richard F. (eds.), Gift Giving: A Research Anthology, (pp. 59–84). Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University Popular Press.Google Scholar

Belk, R. W. (1982). Effects of gift-giving involvement on gift selection strategies. Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 408–412.Google Scholar

Belk, R. W., & Coon, G. S. (1993). Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 393–417.Google Scholar

Berg, J. H., & McQuinn, R. D. (1986). Attraction and exchange in continuing and noncontinuing dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 942.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice (vol. 16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1986). Force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal, 38, 805.Google Scholar

Bradford, T. W. (2009). Intergenerationally gifted asset dispositions. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1), 93–111.Google Scholar

Camerer, C. (1988). Gifts as economic signals and social symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S180–S214.Google Scholar

Chan, C., & Mogilner, C. (2015). Experiential gifts foster stronger relationships than material gifts. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Chan, C., Mogilner, C., & Van Boven, L. (2015). Gratitude, guilt, and gift giving. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Cheal, D. (1988). The Gift Economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684–691.Google Scholar

Clark, M. S., Ouellette, R., Powell, M. C., & Milberg, S. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 94–103.Google Scholar

Dunn, E. W., Huntsinger, J., Lun, J., & Sinclair, S. (2008). The gift of similarity: How good and bad gifts influence relationships. Social Cognition, 26(4), 469–481.Google Scholar

Dunning, D., Griffin, D. W., Milojkovic, J. D., & Ross, L. (1990). The overconfidence effect in social prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 568–581.Google Scholar

Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2011). Conspicuous generosity. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), 1131–1143.Google Scholar

Epley, N., Caruso, N., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006). When perspective taking increases taking: Reactive egoism in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 872–889.Google Scholar

Falk, A. (2007). Gift exchange in the field. Econometrica, 75(5), 1501–1511.Google Scholar

Flynn, F. J., & Adams, G. S. (2009). Money can’t buy love: Asymmetric beliefs about gift price and feelings of appreciation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 404–409.Google Scholar

Gershoff, A. D., & Johar, G. V. (2006). Do you know me? Consumer calibration of friends’ knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 496–503.Google Scholar

Giesler, M. (2006). Consumer gift systems. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 283–290.Google Scholar

Gino, F., & Flynn, F. J. (2011). Give them what they want: The benefits of explicitness in gift exchange. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 915–922.Google Scholar

Gneezy, U., & List, J. A. (2006). Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica, 74(5), 1365–1384.Google Scholar

Joy, A. (2001). Gift giving in Hong Kong and the continuum of social ties. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 239–256.Google Scholar

Kieras, J. E., Tobin, R. M., Graziano, W. G., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). You can’t always get what you want effortful control and children’s responses to undesirable gifts. Psychological Science, 16(5), 391–396.Google Scholar

Kimel, S. Y., Grossmann, I., & Kitayama, S. (2012). When gift-giving produces dissonance: Effects of subliminal affiliation priming on choices for one’s self versus close others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1221–1224.Google Scholar

Kube, S., Maréchal, M. A., & Puppe, C. (2012). The currency of reciprocity: Gift exchange in the workplace. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1644–1662.Google Scholar

Lerouge, D., & Warlop, L. (2006). Why it is so hard to predict our partner’s product preferences: The effect of target familiarity on prediction accuracy. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 393–402.Google Scholar

Lowrey, T. M., Otnes, C. C., & Ruth, J. A. (2004). Social influences on dyadic giving over time: A taxonomy from the giver’s perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 547–558.Google Scholar

Marcoux, J. S. (2009). Escaping the gift economy. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 671–685.Google Scholar

Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 72.Google Scholar

Mauss, M. (1954). The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, W D. New York and London: Norton 1990 [1950], 11.Google Scholar

Minowa, Y., Khomenko, O., & Belk, R. W. (2011). Social change and gendered gift-giving rituals: A historical analysis of Valentine’s Day in Japan. Journal of Macromarketing, 31, 44–56.Google Scholar

Moreau, C. P., Bonney, L., & Herd, K. B. (2011). It’s the thought (and the effort) that counts: How customizing for others differs from customizing for oneself. Journal of Marketing, 75(5), 120–133.Google Scholar

Nguyen, H. P., & Munch, J. M. (2011). Romantic gift giving as chore or pleasure: The effects of attachment orientations on gift giving perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 113–118.Google Scholar

Offenberg, J. P. (2007). Markets: Gift cards. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 227–238.Google Scholar

Roster, C. A. (2006). Moments of truth in gift exchanges: A critical incident analysis of communication indicators used to detect gift failure. Psychology & Marketing, 23(11), 885–903.Google Scholar

Rucker, M., Leckliter, L., Kivel, S., Dinkel, M., Freitas, T., Wynes, M., & Prato, H. (1991). When the thought counts: Friendship, love, gift exchanges and gift returns. Advances in Consumer Research, 18(1), 528–531.Google Scholar

Ruth, J. A., Otnes, C. C., & Brunel, F. F. (1999). Gift receipt and the reformulation of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(4), 385–402.Google Scholar

Saad, G., & Gill, T. (2003). An evolutionary psychology perspective on gift giving among young adults. Psychology & Marketing, 20(9), 765–784.Google Scholar

Saarni, C. (1984). An observational study of children’s attempts to monitor their expressive behavior. Child Development, 55(4), 1504–1513.Google Scholar

Shen, H., Wan, F., & Wyer, R. S. Jr. (2011). Cross-cultural differences in the refusal to accept a small gift: The differential influence of reciprocity norms on Asians and North Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 271.Google Scholar

Sherry, J. F. Jr. (1983). Gift giving in anthropological perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 157–168.Google Scholar

Sherry, J. F. Jr., McGrath, M. A., & Levy, S. J. (1993). The dark side of the gift. Journal of Business Research, 28(3), 225–244.Google Scholar

Steffel, M., & LeBoeuf, R. (2014). Overindividuation in gift giving: Shopping for multiple recipients leads givers to choose unique but less preferred gifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1167–1180.Google Scholar

Swann, W. B. Jr., & Gill, M. B. (1997). Confidence and accuracy in person perception: Do we know what we think we know about our relationship partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(10), 747–757.Google Scholar

Tuten, T. L., & Kiecker, P. (2009). The perfect gift card: An exploration of teenagers’ gift card associations. Psychology & Marketing, 26(1), 67–90.Google Scholar

Vanhamme, J., & de Bont, C. J. (2008). “Surprise gift” purchases: Customer insights from the small electrical appliances market. Journal of Retailing, 84(3), 354–369.Google Scholar

Ward, M. K., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2011). It’s not me, it’s you: How gift giving creates giver identity threat as a function of social closeness. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 164–181.Google Scholar

Ward, M. K., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2015). Ask and you shall (not) receive. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Wolfinbarger, M. (1990). Motivations and symbolism in gift-giving behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 699–706.Google Scholar

Wooten, D. B. (2000). Qualitative steps toward an expanded model of anxiety in gift-giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 84–95.Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., & Epley, N. (2012). Exaggerated, mispredicted, and misplaced: When “it’s the thought that counts” in gift exchanges. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 667–681.Google Scholar

Amaldoss, W., & Jain, S. (2005). Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 30–42.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A. II, Lim, V. K. G., & Felps, W. (2009). testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123–141.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., & Reed, A. II (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.Google Scholar

Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Manchanda, R. V., (2005). The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 207–212.Google Scholar

Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Morales, A. C. (2006). Consumer contamination: How consumers react to products touched by others. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 81–94.Google Scholar

Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Morales, A. C. (2008). Positive consumer contagion: Responses to attractive others in a retail context. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 690–701.Google Scholar

Argo, J. J., and Main, K. J. (2008). Stigma by association in coupon redemption: Looking cheap because of others. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 559–572.Google Scholar

Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 279–290.Google Scholar

Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.” Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70.Google Scholar

Ashworth, L., Darke, P. R., & Schaller, M. (2005). No one wants to look cheap: Trade-offs between social disincentives and the economic and psychological incentives to redeem coupons. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 295–306.Google Scholar

Baca-Motes, K., Brown, A., Gneezy, A., Keenan, E. A., & Nelson, L. D. (2013). Commitment and behavior change: Evidence from the field. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1070–1084.Google Scholar

Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(1), 45–61.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88 4), 589.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.Google Scholar

Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2)(September), 183–194.Google Scholar

Berger, J. (2008). Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 593–607.Google Scholar

Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586–607.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 121–134.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2008). Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 593.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Rand, L. (2008). Shifting signals to help health: Using identity signaling to reduce risky health behaviors. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 509–518.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Ward, M. (2010). Subtle signals of inconspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), 555–569.Google Scholar

Bernieri, F. J. (1988). Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher–student interactions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12(2), 120–138.Google Scholar

Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16–29.Google Scholar

Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. M. (1994). Adolescent skepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics.” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(June), 165–175.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. (2003). Optimal distinctiveness, social identity, and the self. In Leary, M. and Tangney, J. (eds.), Handbook of Self and Identity (pp. 480–491). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Byrne, D., & Griffith, W. (1969). Similarity and awareness of similarity of personality characteristic determinants of attraction. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 3(3), 179–186.Google Scholar

Campbell, M. C. (1995). When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3), 225–254.Google Scholar

Campbell, M. C. (1999). Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(May), 187–199.Google Scholar

Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 69–83.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. D., & Fairey, P. J. (1989). Informational and normative routes to conformity: The effect of faction size as a function of norm extremity and attention to the stimulus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 457.Google Scholar

Chan, C., Berger, J., & Van Boven, L. (2012). Identifiable but not identical: Combining social identity and uniqueness motives in choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 561–573.Google Scholar

Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910.Google Scholar

Chartrand, T. L., Maddux, W. W., & Lakin, J. L. (2005). Beyond the perception-behavior link: The ubiquitous utility and motivational moderators of nonconscious mimicry. In Hassin, Ran R., Uleman, James S., & Bargh, John A. (eds.) The New Unconscious (pp. 334–261). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cheema, A., & Kaikati, A. M. (2010). The effect of need for uniqueness on word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 553–563.Google Scholar

Childers, T. L., & Rao, A. R. (1992). The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(September), 198–211.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and Practice. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. In Fiske, S. T., Schacter, D. L., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology (vol. 55, pp. 591–621). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A, & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24(20), 1–243.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology. 4th ed. (vol. 2, pp. 151–192). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Vincent, J. E., Lewis, S. K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B. L. (1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 206.Google Scholar

Chan, C., Berger, J., & Van Boven, L. (2011). Differentiating the “I” in “in-group”: How identity-signaling and uniqueness motives combine to drive consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 561–573.Google Scholar

Chen, S., Shechter, D., & Chaiken, S. (1996). Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy-versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 262.Google Scholar

Childers, T. L., & Rao, A. K. (1992). The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 198–211.Google Scholar

Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 51.Google Scholar

Colton, C. C. (1820). Lacon (vol. 1). London: Longman, Hurt, Rees, & Brown.Google Scholar

Dahl, D. W. Argo, J. J., & Morales, A. C. (2012). Social information in the retail environment: The importance of consumption alignment, referent identity, and self-esteem. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 860–871.Google Scholar

Dahl, D. W. Honea, H., & Manchanda, R. V. (2005). Three Rs of interpersonal consumer guilt: Relationship, reciprocity, reparation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 307–315.Google Scholar

Dahl, D. W., Manchanda, R. V., & Argo, J. J. (2001). Embarrassment in consumer purchase: The roles of social presence and purchase familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 473–481.Google Scholar

Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973). “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100.Google Scholar

Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629.Google Scholar

Duclos, R., Wen Wan, E., & Jiang, Y. (2013). Show me the honey! Effects of social exclusion on financial risk-taking. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 122–135.Google Scholar

Dunn, Lea, White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2012). That is so not me: Dissociating from undesired consumer identities. In Ruvio, A. & Belk, R. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Identity and Consumption (p. 273), New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Edson Escalas, J., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339–348.Google Scholar

Englis, B. G., & Solomon, M. R. (1995). To be and not to be: Lifestyle imagery, reference groups, and the clustering of America. Journal of Advertising, 24(1), 13–28.Google Scholar

Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 378–389.Google Scholar

Ferraro, R., Bettman, J. R., & Chartrand, T. L. (2009). The power of strangers: The effect of incidental consumer brand encounters on brand choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 729–741.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (vol. 2). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Folkes, V. S., & Kiesler, T. (1991). Social cognition: Consumers’ Inferences about the self and others. Handbook of Consumer Behavior, 3, 281–315.Google Scholar

Foushee, H. C. (1984). Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance. American Psychologist, 39(8), 885.Google Scholar

Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(June), 1–31.Google Scholar

Glazer, A., & Konrad, K. A. (1996). A signaling explanation for charity. American Economic Review, 86(4), 1019–1028.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482.Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. S., & Soong, M. (1986). Threshold models of interpersonal effects in consumer demand. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 7(1), 83–99.Google Scholar

Hardy, C. J., Hall, E. G., & Prestholdt, P. H. (1983). The Mediational Role of Social Influence in the Perception of Exertion. Dissertation, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar

Hebl, M. R., and Mannix, L. M. (2003). The weight of obesity in evaluating others: A mere proximity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1), 28–38.Google Scholar

Irmak, C., Vallen, B., & Sen, S. (2010). You like what I like, but I don’t like what you like: Uniqueness motivations in product preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 443–455.Google Scholar

Jiang, L., Hoegg, J., Dahl, D. W., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2010). The persuasive role of incidental similarity on attitudes and purchase intentions in a sales context. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 778–791.Google Scholar

Kirmani, A. (1990). The effect of perceived advertising costs on brand perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(September), 160–171.Google Scholar

Kirmani, A., & Campbell, M. C. (2004). Goal seeker and persuasion sentry: How consumer targets respond to interpersonal marketing persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 573–582.Google Scholar

Kirmani, A., & Wright, P. (1989). Money talks: Perceived advertising expense and expected product quality. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(December), 344–353.Google Scholar

Kolditz, T. A., and Arkin, R. M. (1982). An impression management interpretation of the self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 492.Google Scholar

Krishna, A., & Morrin, M. (2008). Does touch affect taste? The perceptual transfer of product container haptic cues. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 807–818.Google Scholar

Kristofferson, K., & White, K. (2015). I shared what you did last summer: vicarious impression management via the good deeds of others. Working Paper.Google Scholar

Kristofferson, K., White, K., & Peloza, J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support impacts subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1149–1166.Google Scholar

Kurt, D., Inman, J. J., & Argo, J. J. (2011). The influence of friends on consumer spending: The role of agency-communion orientation and self-monitoring. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(4), 741–754.Google Scholar

La France, M. (1979). Nonverbal synchrony and rapport: Analysis by the cross-lag panel technique. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42(1), 66–70.Google Scholar

Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioural mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14(4), 334–336.Google Scholar

Lasaleta, J. D., Sedikides, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2014). Nostalgia weakens the desire for money. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 713–729.Google Scholar

Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34.Google Scholar

Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518.Google Scholar

Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012). Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 530–544.Google Scholar

Lee, K., Kim, H., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Stereotype threat in the marketplace: Consumer anxiety and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 343–357.Google Scholar

Lee, S., Winterich, K. P., & Ross, W. T. Jr. (2014). I’m moral, but I won’t help you: The distinct roles of empathy and justice in donations.” Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3).Google Scholar

Lewin, K. (1935). A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Luo, X. (2005). How does shopping with others influence impulsive purchasing? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 288–294.Google Scholar

Marques, J., Abrams, D., & Paez, D. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgments of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 976–988.Google Scholar

McFerran, B., Dahl, D. W., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Morales, A. C. (2010a). I’ll have what she’s having: Effects of social influence and body type on the food choices of others. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 915–929.Google Scholar

McFerran, B., Dahl, D. W., Fitzsimons, G. J., & Morales, A. C. (2010b). “Might an Overweight Waitress Make You Eat More? How the body type of others is sufficient to alter our food consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 146–151.Google Scholar

Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., Rawn, C. D., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 902–919.Google Scholar

Menon, S.,& Kahn, B. E. (2003). Corporate sponsorships of philanthropic activities: When do they impact perception of sponsor brand? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 316–327.Google Scholar

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371.Google Scholar

Mooy, S. C., & Robben, H. S. J. (2002). Managing consumers’ product evaluations through direct product experience. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11(7), 432–446.Google Scholar

Moschis, G. P. (1976). Social comparison and informal group influence. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(August), 237–244.Google Scholar

Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C., & Norton, D. A. (2011). Seeing ourselves in others: Reviewer ambiguity, egocentric anchoring, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 617–631.Google Scholar

Nemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). The contagion concept in adult thinking in the United States: Transmission of germs and of interpersonal influence. Ethos, 22(2), 158–186.Google Scholar

Newman, G. E., Diesendruck, G., & Bloom, P. (2011). Celebrity contagion and the value of objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 215–228.Google Scholar

Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1977). Students and housewives: Differences in susceptibility to reference group influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 102–110.Google Scholar

Pechmann, C., Zhao, G., Goldberg, M. E., & Reibling, E. T. (2003). What to convey in antismoking advertisements for adolescents: The use of protection motivation theory to identify effective message themes. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 1–18.Google Scholar

Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2006). If I touch it I have to have it: Individual and environmental influences on impulse purchasing. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 765–769.Google Scholar

Poon, K., Chen, Z., & DeWall, C. N. (2013). Feeling entitled to more ostracism increases dishonest behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(9), 1227–1239.Google Scholar

Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841–1848.Google Scholar

Reed, A. II, & Aquino, K. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1270–1286.Google Scholar

Reed, A. II, Aquino, K., & Levy, E. (2007). Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 71(January), 178–193.Google Scholar

Reno, R. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kallgren, C. A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 104.Google Scholar

Rozin, P., & Nemeroff, C. (1990). The laws of sympathetic magic: A psychological analysis of similarity and contagion, Psychological Science, 1(6), 383–384.Google Scholar

Satow, K. L. (1975). Social approval and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(6), 501–509.Google Scholar

Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar

Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92(3), 641.Google Scholar

Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–434.Google Scholar

Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 209–269.Google Scholar

Sengupta, J., Dahl, D. W., & Gorn, G. G. (2002). Misrepresentation in the consumer context. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 69–79.Google Scholar

Shalev, E., & Morwitz, V. G. (2011). Influence via comparison-driven self-evaluation and restoration: The case of the low-status influencer. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 964–980.Google Scholar

Sherif, M. (1936). The Psychology of Social Norms. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. M. (2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 49–68.Google Scholar

Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591.Google Scholar

Snyder, C. R. (1992). Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: A consumer catch-22 carousel? Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 9–24.Google Scholar

Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518.Google Scholar

Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Sujan, H. (1996). Special session summary: Influence professionals. In Brucks, Merrie and MacInnis, Deborah J. (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (vol. 24, pp. 334–335). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar

Tanner, R. J., Ferraro, R., Chartrand, T. L., Bettman, J. R., & van Baaren, R. (2008). Of chameleons and consumption: The impact of mimicry on choice and preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(April), 754–766.Google Scholar

Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(June), 50–66.Google Scholar

Tian, K. T., & McKenzie, K. (2001). The long-term predictive validity of consumers’ need for uniqueness scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3), 171–193.Google Scholar

Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5); 649–655.Google Scholar

Turner, J. C. (1985). Social Categorization and the Self-Concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar

Turner, J. C. (1991). Social Influence. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 56.Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001). If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1058–1069.Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M., Catanese, K. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Social exclusion causes self-defeating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 606–615.Google Scholar

United States Census Bureau (2014). Quarterly Retail E-Commerce Sales Report. www.census.gov/retail/mrts/www/data/pdf/ec_current.pdf.Google Scholar

Valenti, A. C., & Downing, L. L. (1975). Differential effects of jury size on verdicts following deliberation as a function of the apparent guilt of a defendant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(4), 655.Google Scholar

van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Kawakami, K., & van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychological Science, 15(1), 71–74.Google Scholar

van Baaren, R. B., Maddux, W. W., Chartrand, T. L., De Bouter, C., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1093–1102.Google Scholar

Ward, M. K. and Dahl, D. W. (2014). Should the devil sell Prada? Retail rejection increases aspiring consumers’ desire for the brand. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 590–609.Google Scholar

Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 258–270.Google Scholar

White, K., & Argo, J. J. (2009). Social identity threat and consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 313–325.Google Scholar

White, K., & Argo, J. J. (2011). When imitation doesn’t flatter: The role of consumer distinctiveness in responses to mimicry. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(4), 667–680.Google Scholar

White, K., Argo, J. J., & Sengupta, J. (2012). Dissociative versus associative responses to social identity threat: The role of consumer self-construal. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 704–719.Google Scholar

White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2006). To be or not be? The influencer of dissociative reference groups on consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 404–414.Google Scholar

White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2007). Are all out-groups created equal? Consumer identity and dissociative influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 525–536.Google Scholar

White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: Their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 109–124.Google Scholar

White, K., & Simpson, B. (2013). The “dos and don’ts” of normative influence: When do (and don’t) normative messages lead to sustainable consumer behaviors? Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 78–95.Google Scholar

White, K., Simpson, B., & Argo, J. J. (2014). The motivating role of dissociative outgroups in encouraging positive consumer behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(4), 433–447.Google Scholar

Wilcox, K., & Stephen, A. T. (2013). Are close friends the enemy? Online social networks, self-esteem and self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 90–103.Google Scholar

Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748–762.Google Scholar

Williams, K. D., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). Social ostracism by coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 693–706.Google Scholar

Winterich, K. P., & Barone, M. J. (2011). Warm glow or cold, hard cash? Social identity effects on consumer choice for donation versus discount promotions. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 855–868.Google Scholar

Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & Aquino, K. (2013). When does recognition increase charitable behavior? Toward a moral identity-based model. Journal of Marketing, 77(May), 121–134.Google Scholar

Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T. Jr. (2009). Donation behavior toward in-groups and out-groups: The role of gender and moral identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(August), 199–214.Google Scholar

Winterich, K. P., Zhang, Y., & Mittal, V. (2012). How political identity and charity positioning increase donations: Insights from moral foundations theory. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 346–354.Google Scholar

Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 323.Google Scholar

Zimbardo, P. (1972). Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison. Fort Belvior, VA: Defense Technical Information Center.Google Scholar

Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimension of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347–356.Google Scholar

Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776.Google Scholar

Abele, A. E., & Brack, S. (2013). Preference for other persons’ traits is dependent on the kind of social relationship. Social Psychology, 44, 84–94.Google Scholar

Abele, A. E., & Bruckmüller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935–948.Google Scholar

Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763.Google Scholar

Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (in press). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.Google Scholar

Aggarwal, P. (2004). The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 87–101.Google Scholar

Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2012). When brands seem human, do humans act like brands? Automatic behavioral priming effects of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 307–323.Google Scholar

Anthony, C. I., & Cowley, E. (2012). The labor of lies: How lying for material rewards polarizes outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 478–492.Google Scholar

Argo, J. J., White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2006). Social comparison theory and deception in the interpersonal exchange of consumption information. Journal Consumer Research, 33, 99–108.Google Scholar

Argo, J. J., & Shiv, B. (2010). Are white lies as innocuous as we think? Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 1093–1102.Google Scholar

Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 279–290.Google Scholar

Bakan, D. (1966). The Duality of Human Existence: An Essay on Psychology and Religion. Oxford: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Bartz, J. A., & Lydon, J. E. (2004). Close relationships and the working self-concept: Implicit and explicit effects of priming attachment on agency and communion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1389–1401.Google Scholar

Batson, C. (2008). Moral masquerades: Experimental exploration of the nature of moral motivation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7, 51–66.Google Scholar

Batson, C., Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J. L., Kampf, H. C., & Wilson, A. D. (1997). In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1335–1348.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & Brewer, L. E. (2012). Believing versus disbelieving in free will: Correlates and consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 736–745.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing Control: How and Why People Fail at Self-Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar

Bi, C., Ybarra, O., & Zhao, Y. (2013). Accentuating your masculine side: Agentic traits generally dominate self-evaluation, even in China. Social Psychology, 44, 103–108.Google Scholar

Bleidorn, W., Kandler, C., Hülsheger, U. R., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2010). Nature and nurture of the interplay between personality traits and major life goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 366–379.Google Scholar

Bosak, J., Sczesny, S., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). The impact of social roles on trait judgments: A critical reexamination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 429–440.Google Scholar

Brown, K. W., & Moskowitz, D. S. (1998). Dynamic stability of behavior: The rhythms of our interpersonal lives. Journal of Personality, 66, 105–134.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (1990). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: An analysis of the negative components of masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles, 22, 555–568.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25.Google Scholar

Campbell, M., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 69–83.Google Scholar

Carrier, A., Louvet, E., Chauvin, B., & Rohmer, O. (2014). The primacy of agency over competence in status perception. Social Psychology, 45, 347–356.Google Scholar

Chandler, J., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Use does not wear ragged the fabric of friendship: Thinking of objects as alive makes people less willing to replace them. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 138–145.Google Scholar

Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125.Google Scholar

Christopher, A. N., & Schlenker, B. R. (2000). The impact of perceived material wealth and perceiver personality on first impressions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21, 1–19.Google Scholar

Cislak, A. (2013). Effects of power on social perception: All your boss can see is agency. Social Psychology, 44, 138–146.Google Scholar

Cislak, A., & Wojciszke, B. (2008). Agency and communion are inferred from actions serving interests of self or others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1103–1110.Google Scholar

Clarks, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.Google Scholar

Coolsen, M. K., & Nelson, L. J. (2001). Desiring and avoiding close romantic attachment in response to mortality salience. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 44, 257–276.Google Scholar

Coren, S., & Hewitt, P. L. (1999). Sex differences in elderly suicide rates: Some predictive factors. Aging & Mental Health, 3, 112–118.Google Scholar

Cotte, J. & Ratneshwar, S. (2000). Time style and consuming time: Why we do what we do with our time. In Ratneshwar, S., Mick, D. G., & Huffman, C. (eds.), The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires (pp. 216–236). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Costos, D. (1986). Sex role identity in young adults: its parental antecedents and relation to ego development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 601–611.Google Scholar

Cuddy, A. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648.Google Scholar

Cuddy, A. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 40, pp. 61–149). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar

Danoff-Burg, S., Mosher, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (2006). Relations of agentic and communal personality traits to health behavior and substance use among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 353–363.Google Scholar

Diehl, M., Owen, S. K., & Youngblade, L. M. (2004). Agency and communion attributes in adults’ spontaneous self-representations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 1–15.Google Scholar

Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.Google Scholar

Dindia, K. (2006). Men are from North Dakota, women are from South Dakota. In Dindia, K. & Canary, D. J. (eds.), Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication (pp. 3–20). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Dommer, S. L., & Swaminathan, V. (2013). Explaining the endowment effect through ownership: The role of identity, gender, and self-threat. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 1034–50.Google Scholar

Dréze, X., & Nunes, J. C. (2009). Feeling superior: The impact of loyalty program structure on consumers’ perceptions of status. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 890–905.Google Scholar

Dunlop, W. L., Walker, L. J., & Matsuba, M. (2013). The development of moral motivation across the adult lifespan. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 285–300.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Escalas, J. E. (1996). Narrative Processing: Building Connections between Brand and the Self. Dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar

Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2000). Using narratives to discern self-identity related consumer goals and motivations. In Ratneshwar, S., Mick, D. G., & Huffman, C. (eds.), The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires (pp. 237–258). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Evans, F. B. (1963). Selling as a dyadic relationship: A new approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 6, 76–79.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.Google Scholar

Fournier, M. A., & Moskowitz, D. S. (2000). The mitigation of interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 827–836.Google Scholar

Frimer, J. A., Schaefer, N. K., & Oakes, H. (2014). Moral actor, selfish agent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 790–802.Google Scholar

Frimer, J. A. & Walker, L. J. (2009). Reconciling the self and morality: An empirical model of moral centrality development. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1669–1681.Google Scholar

Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Dunlop, W. L., Lee, B., & Riches, A. (2011). The integration of agency and communion in moral personality: Evidence of enlightened self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 149–163.Google Scholar

Frimer, J. A., Walker, L. J., Lee, B. H., Riches, A., & Dunlop, W. L. (2012). Hierarchical integration of agency and communion: A study of influential moral figures. Journal of Personality, 80, 1117–1145.Google Scholar

Fritz, H. L., Nagurney, A. J., & Helgeson, V. S. (2003). Social interactions and cardiovascular reactivity during problem disclosure among friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 713–725.Google Scholar

Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E., Schreier, M., & Dahl, D. W. (2013). All that is users might not be gold: How labeling products as user designed backfires in the context of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Marketing, 77, 75–91.Google Scholar

Gebauer, J. E., Leary, M. R., & Neberich, W. (2012). Big two personality and big three mate preferences: Similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1579–1593.Google Scholar

Gebauer, J. E., Paulhus, D. L., & Neberich, W. (2013). Big two personality and religiosity across cultures: Communals as religious conformists and agentics as religious contrarians. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 21–30.Google Scholar

Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B., & Maio, G. R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 854–878.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar

Grant, A. M., & Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 946–955.Google Scholar

Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon/Random House.Google Scholar

Hall, J. A. (2011). Sex differences in friendship expectations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 723–747.Google Scholar

Hart, C. M., Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Arndt, J., Routledge, C., & Vingerhoets, A. M. (2011). Nostalgic recollections of high and low narcissists. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 238–242.Google Scholar

He, X., Inman, J. J., & Mittal, V. (2008). Gender jeopardy in financial risk taking. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 414–424.Google Scholar

Helgeson, V. S. (1993). Implications of agency and communion for patient and spouse adjustment to a first coronary event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 807–816.Google Scholar

Helgeson, V. S. (1994). The relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428.Google Scholar

Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1998). A theory of unmitigated communion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 173–183.Google Scholar

Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1999). Unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion: Distinctions from agency and communion. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 131–158.Google Scholar

Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (2000). The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 1031–1057.Google Scholar

Helgeson, V. S., & Lepore, S. J. (2004). Quality of life following prostate cancer: The role of agency and unmitigated agency. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2559–2585.Google Scholar

Henderson, C. M., Beck, J. T., & Palmatier, R. W. (2011). Review of theoretical underpinnings of loyalty programs. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 256–276.Google Scholar

Hill, R. P. (1994). Bill collectors and consumers: A troublesome exchange relationship. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 13, 20–35.Google Scholar

Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review, 86, 653–660.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Holt, C. L., & Ellis, J. B. (1998). Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 39, 929–941.Google Scholar

Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). Diminishing returns: The effects of income on the content of stereotypes of wage earners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1538–1545.Google Scholar

Jorgenson, D. O. (1981). Agency and communion trends in consumer goods advertising. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 410–414.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.Google Scholar

Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616–642.Google Scholar

Kurt, D. (2015). Feeling Powerful and Chasing High Returns: The Interactive Effect of Power and Agency–Communion on Financial Risk Taking. Working Paper, Boston University.Google Scholar

Kurt, D., Inman, J. J., & Argo, J. J. (2011). The influence of friends on consumer spending: The role of agency–communion and self-monitoring. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 741–754.Google Scholar

Lambert, A., & Desmond, J. (2013). Loyal now, but not forever! A study of narcissism and male consumer-brand relationships. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 690–706.Google Scholar

Leszczynski, J. (2009). A state conceptualization: Are individuals’ masculine and feminine personality traits situationally influenced? Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 157–162.Google Scholar

Lippa, R. (2001). On deconstructing and reconstructing masculinity–femininity. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 168–207.Google Scholar

Ma, Z., & Dube, L. (2011). Process and outcome interdependency in frontline service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 75, 83–98.Google Scholar

Mansfield, E. D., & McAdams, D. P. (1996). Generativity and themes of agency and communion in adult autobiography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 721–731.Google Scholar

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.Google Scholar

Matsuba, M., & Walker, L. J. (2005). Young adult moral exemplars: The making of self through stories. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 275–297.Google Scholar

Mayer, D. & Greenberg, H. M. (1964). What makes a good salesman. Harvard Business Review (July–August), 119–125.Google Scholar

McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.Google Scholar

Meyers-Levy, J. (1988). The influence of sex roles on judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 522–530.Google Scholar

Mosher, C. E., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2008). Agentic and communal personality traits: Relations to disordered eating behavior, body shape concern, and depressive symptoms. Eating Behaviors, 9, 497–500.Google Scholar

Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753–761.Google Scholar

Nagurney, A., & Bagwell, B. (2009). Relations of the gender-related personality traits and stress to sexual behaviors among college students. North American Journal of Psychology, 11, 85–96.Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L., & John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060.Google Scholar

Peeters, G. (2008). The evaluative face of a descriptive model: Communion and agency in Peabody’s tetradic model of trait organization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1066–1072.Google Scholar

Quester, P., & Steyer, A. (2010). Revisiting individual choices in group settings: The long and winding (less traveled) road? Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 1050–1057.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., Dubois, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Generous paupers and stingy prices: Power drives consumer spending on self versus others. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 1015–29.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Dubois, D. (2012). Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 352–68.Google Scholar

Scott, M. L., Mende, M., & Bolton, L. E. (2013), Judging the book by its cover? How consumers decode conspicuous consumption cues in buyer–seller relationship. Journal of Marketing Research, 50, 334–347.Google Scholar

Sedikides, C., Gregg, A. P., Cisek, S., & Hart, C. M. (2007). The I that buys: Narcissists as consumers. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 254–257.Google Scholar

Sela, A., Berger, J., & Lie, W. (2009). Variety, vice, and virtue: How assortment size influences option choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 941–951.Google Scholar

Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809.Google Scholar

Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 580–591.Google Scholar

Smith, T. W., Gallo, L. C., Goble, L., Ngu, L. Q., & Stark, K. A. (1998). Agency, communion, and cardiovascular reactivity during marital interaction. Health Psychology, 17, 537–545.Google Scholar

Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.Google Scholar

Stopfer, J. M., Egloff, B., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2013). Being popular in online social networks: How agentic, communal, and creativity traits relate to judgments of status and liking. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 592–598.Google Scholar

Strahan, R. F. (1975). Remarks on Bem’s measurement of psychological androgyny: Alternative methods and a supplementary analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 568–571.Google Scholar

Suh, E., Moskowitz, D. S., Fournier, M. A., & Zuroff, D. C. (2004). Gender and relationships: Influences on agentic and communal behaviors. Personal Relationships, 11, 41–59.Google Scholar

Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Implicit and self-attributed achievement motives: Concordance and predictive validity. Journal of Personality, 70, 729–756.Google Scholar

Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2012). Agentic and communal values: Their scope and measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 39–52.Google Scholar

Trudeau, K. J., Danoff-Burg, S., Revenson, T. A., & Paget, S. A. (2003). Agency and communion in people with rheumatoid arthritis. Sex Roles, 49, 303–311.Google Scholar

Trusov, M., Bodapati, A. V., & Bucklin, R. E. (2010). Determining influential users in internet social networks. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 643–658.Google Scholar

Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.Google Scholar

Uchronski, M. (2008). Agency and communion in spontaneous self-descriptions: Occurrence and situational malleability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1093–1102.Google Scholar

Uchronski, M., Abele, A. E., & Bruckmüller, S. (2013). Empathic perspective taking and the situational malleability of the communal self-concept. Self and Identity, 12, 238–258.Google Scholar

Walker, L. J., & Frimer, J. A. (2007). Moral personality of brave and caring exemplars. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 845–860.Google Scholar

Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44, 1205–1217.Google Scholar

White, K. M., Speisman, J.C., Jackson, D., Bartis, S., Costos, D. (1986). Intimacy maturity and its correlates in young married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 152–162.Google Scholar

Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.Google Scholar

Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T. Jr. (2009). Donation behavior toward in-groups and out-groups: The role of gender and moral identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 199–214.Google Scholar

Woike, B., Gershkovich, I., Piorkowski, R., & Polo, M. (1999). The role of motives in the content and structure of autobiographical memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 600–612.Google Scholar

Woike, B., Lavezzary, E., & Barsky, J. (2001). The influence of implicit motives on memory processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 935–945.Google Scholar

Woike, B., & Polo, M. (2001). Motive-related memories: Content, structure, and affect. Journal of Personality, 69, 391–415.Google Scholar

Wojciszke, B., Abele, A. E., & Baryla, W. (2009). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 973–990.Google Scholar

Wojciszke, B., Baryla, W., Parzuchowski, M., Szymkow, A., & Abele, A. E. (2011). Self-esteem is dominated by agentic over communal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 617–627.Google Scholar

Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251–1263.Google Scholar

Wojciszke, B., & Sobiczewska, P. (2013). Memory and self-esteem: The role of agentic and communal content. Social Psychology, 44, 95–102.Google Scholar

Woodside, A. G., & Davenport, J. W. Jr. (1974). The effect of salesman similarity and expertise on consumer purchasing behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 198–202.Google Scholar

Ybarra, O., Chan, E., Park, H., Burnstein, E., Monin, B., & Stanik, C. (2008). Life’s recurring challenges and the fundamental dimensions: An integration and its implications for cultural differences and similarities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1083–1092.Google Scholar

Ybarra, O., Park, H., Stanik, C., & Lee, D. (2012). Self-judgment and reputation monitoring as a function of the fundamental dimensions, temporal perspective, and culture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 200–209.Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Feick, L., & Mittal, V. (2014). How males and females differ in their likelihood of transmitting negative word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 1097–1108.Google Scholar

Zhu, R., Dholakia, U. M., Chen, X., & Algesheimer, R. (2012). Does online community participation foster risky financial behavior? Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 394–407.Google Scholar

Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In Golle, P. & Danezis, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (pp. 36–58). Cambridge, UK: Robinson College.Google Scholar

Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 19–34.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Bacon, F. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5(3), 241–252. doi:10.1037//0278–7393.5.3.241.Google Scholar

Bakshy, E. (2012). Rethinking Information Diversity in Networks. Facebook. Retrieved from www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-data-team/rethinking-information-diversity-in-networks/10150503499618859.Google Scholar

Bambauer-Sachse, S., & Mangold, S. (2013). Do consumers still believe what is said in online product reviews? A persuasion knowledge approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(4), 373–381. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.03.004.Google Scholar

Barasch, A., & Berger, J. (2014). Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size impacts what people share. Journal of Marketing Research, 140130091437001. doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0238.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.Google Scholar

Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500. doi:10.1086/671052.Google Scholar

Benedicktus, R. L., Brady, M. K., Darke, P. R., & Voorhees, C. M. (2010). Conveying trustworthiness to online consumers: Reactions to consensus, physical store presence, brand familiarity, and generalized suspicion. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 322–335. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2010.04.002.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Iyengar, R. (2013). Communication channels and word of mouth: How the medium shapes the message. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 567–579. doi:10.1086/671345.Google Scholar

Bisgin, H., Agarwal, N., & Xu, X. (2012). A study of homophily on social media. World Wide Web, 15(2), 213–232.Google Scholar

Bohnert, D., & Ross, W. H. (2010). The influence of social networking web sites on the evaluation of job candidates. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(3), 341–347. Retrieved from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20557256.Google Scholar

Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.Google Scholar

Chan, C., Berger, J., & Van Boyen, Leaf, (2012). Identifiable but not identical: Combining social identity and uniquenss motives in choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 561–573.Google Scholar

Cheema, A., & Kaikati, A. M. (2010). The effect of need for uniqueness on word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, XLVII(June), 553–563.Google Scholar

Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2005). Third-party product review and firm marketing strategy. Marketing Science, 24(2), 218–240. doi:10.1287/mksc.l040.0089.Google Scholar

Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. O. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337–1343. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028.Google Scholar

Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 345(XLIII), 345–354.Google Scholar

Chintagunta, P. K., Gopinath, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2010). The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Science, 29(5), 944–957. doi:10.1287/mksc.1100.0572.Google Scholar

Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(3), 341–345. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0226.Google Scholar

Clemons, E. K., Gao, G., & Hitt, L. M. (2006). When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 149–171. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222230207.Google Scholar

Culnan, M. J. (2000). Protecting privacy online: Is self-regulation working? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 20–26.Google Scholar

Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 104–115.Google Scholar

De Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003.Google Scholar

Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A.-K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83–108. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2009.01494.x.Google Scholar

Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X. (Michael), & Awad, N. F. (2007). Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 23–45. doi:10.1002/dir.20087.Google Scholar

Dey, R., Jelveh, Z., & Ross, K. (2012). Facebook users have become much more private: A large-scale study. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (pp. 346–352). Ieee. doi:10.1109/PerComW.2012.6197508.Google Scholar

Emerson, R. (2011). 13 controversial Facebook firings: Palace guards, doctors, teachers, and more. Huffington Post. Retrieved from www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/17/facebook-firings_n_1003789.html#s375205title=Teen_Fired_For.Google Scholar

Escalas, J. E., & Stern, B. B. (2003). Sympathy and empathy: Emotional responses to advertising dramas. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 566–578.Google Scholar

Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009). Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 153–160. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006.Google Scholar

Fogelin, R. (1988). Hume and Berkeley on the proofs of infinite divisibility. Philosophical Review, 97(1), 47–69.Google Scholar

Fournier, S., Senisper, S., McAlexander, J. H., & Shouten, J. W. (2001). Building brand community on the Harley-Davidson posse ride. Harvard Business School case 9-501-015.Google Scholar

Frost, J., Vermeulen, I. E., & Beekers, N. (2014). Anonymity versus privacy: Selective information sharing in online cancer communities. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(5), e126.Google Scholar

Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E., Schreier, M., & Dahl, D. W. (2013). All that is users might not be gold: How labeling products as user designed backfires in the context of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Marketing, 77(September), 75–91.Google Scholar

Gershoff, A. D., & Koehler, J. J. (2011). Safety first? The role of emotion in safety product betrayal aversion. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 140–150. doi:10.1086/658883.Google Scholar

Gershoff, A. D., Mukherjee, A., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of online agent advice: Extremity and positivity effects. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1–2), 161–170. doi:10.1207/S15327663JCP13–1&2_14.Google Scholar

Gershoff, A. D., Mukherjee, A., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2007). Few ways to love, but many ways to hate: Attribute ambiguity and the positivity effect in agent evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 499–505.Google Scholar

Gershoff, A. D., Mukherjee, A., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2008). What's not to like? Preference asymmetry in the false consensus effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 119–125. doi:10.1086/524416.Google Scholar

Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(10), 1498–1512. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2010.188.Google Scholar

Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23(4), 545–560. doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0071.Google Scholar

Goel, V. (2014). As data overflows online, researchers grapple with ethics. New York Times, August 12. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2014/08/13/technology/the-boon-of-online-data-puts-social-science-in-a-quandary.html.Google Scholar

Griffiths, M. D., Davies, M. N. O., & Chappell, D. (2004). Demographic factors and playing variables in online computer gaming. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 479–487. doi:10.1089/cpb.2004.7.479.Google Scholar

Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Proceedings of WPES'05 (pp. 71–80). Alexandria, VA: ACM. doi:10.1145/1102199.1102214.Google Scholar

Hamilton, R., Vohs, K. D., & McGill, A. (2014). We'll be honest, this won't be the best article you'll ever read: The use of dispreferred markers in word-of-mouth communication. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 197–212.Google Scholar

Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives (pp. 1–85). Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks.aspx.Google Scholar

Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500.Google Scholar

Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrated review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264.Google Scholar

Hawkins, S. A., & Hoch, S. J. (1992). Low-involvement learning : Memory without evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 212–225.Google Scholar

He, S. X., & Bond, S. D. (2013). Word-of-mouth and the forecasting of consumption enjoyment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 464–482. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.04.001.Google Scholar

Ho-Dac, N. N., Carson, S. J., & Moore, W. L. (2013). The effects of positive and negative online customer reviews: Do brand strength and category maturity matter? Journal of Marketing, 77(November), 37–53.Google Scholar

Hollenbeck, C. R., & Kaikati, A. M. (2012). Consumers’ use of brands to reflect their actual and ideal selves on Facebook. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 395–405. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.06.002.Google Scholar

Ibrahim, Y. (2008). The new risk communities: Social networking sites and risk. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 4(2), 245–253.Google Scholar

Jayanti, R. K., & Singh, J. (2010). Pragmatic learning theory: An inquiry-action framework for distributed consumer learning in online communities. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 1058–1081. doi:10.1086/648689.Google Scholar

Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 1338–1339.Google Scholar

Khare, A., Labrecque, L. I., & Asare, A. K. (2011). The assimilative and contrastive effects of word-of-mouth volume: An experimental examination of online consumer ratings. Journal of Retailing, 87(1), 111–126. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2011.01.005.Google Scholar

Koehler, J. J., & Gershoff, A. D. (2003). Betrayal aversion: When agents of protection become agents of harm. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(2), 244–261. doi:10.1016/S0749–5978(02)00518-6.Google Scholar

Kozinets, R. V., Hemetsberger, a., & Schau, H. J. (2008). The wisdom of consumer crowds: Collective innovation in the age of networked marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(4), 339–354. doi:10.1177/0276146708325382.Google Scholar

Kozinets, R. V, Valck, K. De, Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. S. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(March), 71–89.Google Scholar

Krasnova, H., Kolesnikova, E., & Guenther, O. (2009). “It won't happen to me!”: Self-disclosure in online social networks. In AMCIS 2009 Proceedings (p. 343).Google Scholar

Kronrod, A., & Danziger, S. (2013). “Wii will rock you!” The use and effect of figurative language in consumer reviews of hedonic and utilitarian consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4), 726–739. doi:10.1086/671998.Google Scholar

Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. L. (2012). When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, 76(July), 109–125.Google Scholar

Li, F., & Du, T. C. (2011). Who is talking? An ontology-based opinion leader identification framework for word-of-mouth marketing in online social blogs. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 190–197. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.007.Google Scholar

Lovett, M. J., Peres, R., & Shachar, R. (2013). On brands and word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, L(August), 427–444.Google Scholar

Mathwick, C., Wiertz, C., & Ruyter, K. de. (2008). Social capital production in a virtual P3 community. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 832–849.Google Scholar

Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2009). The effects of teacher self-disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 175–183. doi:10.1080/17439880902923655.Google Scholar

McDonald, A. M., & Cranor, L. F. (2008). The cost of reading privacy policies. Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 4(3), 540–565.Google Scholar

McDuling, J. (2014). Why people quit Twitter. Quartz. Retrieved from http://qz.com/191524/why-people-quit-twitter/.Google Scholar

Mcpherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(2001), 415–444.Google Scholar

Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 50–64.Google Scholar

Moe, W. W., & Trusov, M. (2011). The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. Journal of Marketing Research, XLVIII(June), 444–456.Google Scholar

Moore, S. G. (2012). Some things are better left unsaid: How word of mouth influences the storyteller. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 1140–1154. doi:10.1086/661891.Google Scholar

Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200.Google Scholar

Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007.Google Scholar

Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & Norton, D. (2011). Seeing ourselves in others: Reviewer ambiguity, egocentric anchoring, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, XLVIII(June), 617–631.Google Scholar

Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & West, P. M. (2012). Beyond the “like” button: The impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. Journal of Marketing, 76(November), 105–120.Google Scholar

Packard, G., & Wooten, D. B. (2013). Compensatory knowledge signaling in consumer word-of-mouth. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 434–450. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.05.002.Google Scholar

Park, D.-H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125–148. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415110405.Google Scholar

Park, S.-B., & Park, D.-H. (2013). The effect of low-versus high-variance in product reviews on product evaluation. Psychology and Marketing, 30(7), 543–554. doi:10.1002/mar.Google Scholar

Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. (2008). Social networking profiles: An examination of student attitudes regarding use and appropriateness of content. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 95–7. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9927.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center (2014). The Web at 25 in the U.S (pp. 1–40). Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/files/2014/02/PIP_25th-anniversary-of-the-Web_0227141.pdf.Google Scholar

Punj, G. N. (2012). Do consumers who conduct online research also post online reviews? A model of the relationship between online research and review posting behavior. Marketing Letters, 24(1), 97–108. doi:10.1007/s11002-012-9205-2.Google Scholar

Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(June), 525–547.Google Scholar

Rosengren, K. E., Wenner, L. A., & Palmgren, P. (eds.) (1985). Media Gratifications Research: Current Perspectives. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contract. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 511–541. doi:10.1348/096317901167505.Google Scholar

Sanger, L. (2013). Internet silos. Edge.org. Retrieved from http://edge.org/response-detail/23777.Google Scholar

Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M. Jr., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(September), 30–51.Google Scholar

Schellekens, G. A. C., Verlegh, P. W. J., & Smidts, A. (2010). Language abstraction in word of mouth. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 207–223. doi:10.1086/651240.Google Scholar

Schindler, R. M., & Bickart, B. (2012). Perceived helpfulness of online consumer reviews: The role of message content and style. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(March), 234–243. doi:10.1002/cb.Google Scholar

Schlosser, A. E. (2005). Posting versus lurking: Communicating in a multiple audience context. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 260–265.Google Scholar

Schlosser, A. E. (2011). Can including pros and cons increase the helpfulness and persuasiveness of online reviews? The interactive effects of ratings and arguments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(3), 226–239. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.04.002.Google Scholar

Schlosser, A. E., & Shavitt, S. (2002). Anticipating discussion about a product: Rehearsing what to say can affect your judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 101–115.Google Scholar

Scholl, S. G., Greifeneder, R., & Bless, H. (2014). When fluency signals truth: Prior successful reliance on fluency moderates the impact of fluency on truth judgments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(3), 268–280. doi:10.1002/bdm.1805.Google Scholar

Sen, S., & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 76–94. doi:10.1002/dir.Google Scholar

Sheldon, K. M., Abad, N., & Hinsch, C. (2011). A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 766–775. doi:10.1037/a0022407.Google Scholar

Soster, R. L., Boland, W. A., & Drenten, J. (2014). Digital consumption: adolescents cellphones, and the unintended creation of tethered identity. Paper presented at American Psychological Association Annual Convention (Division 23), Washington, DC, August.Google Scholar

Sridhar, S., & Srinivasan, R. (2012). Social influence effects in online product ratings. Journal of Marketing, 76(September), 70–88.Google Scholar

Starbird, K., Maddock, J., Orand, M., Achterman, P., & Mason, R. M. (2014). Rumors, false flags, and digital vigilantes: Misinformation on Twitter after the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing. In iConference 2014 Proceedings. iSchools. doi:10.9776/14308.Google Scholar

Story, L. (2008). How do they track you? Let us count the ways. New York Times, March 3. Retrieved from http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/how-do-they-track-you-let-us-count-the-ways/.Google Scholar

Stutzman, F., & Kramer-Duffield, J. (2010). Friends only: Examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in Facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘10) (pp. 1553–1562). ACM Press.Google Scholar

Sundie, J. M., Ward, J. C., Beal, D. J., Chin, W. W., & Geiger-Oneto, S. (2009). Schadenfreude as a consumption-related emotion: Feeling happiness about the downfall of another's product. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 356–373.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Tate, R. (2011). How Google spies on your gmail account (and how to stop it). Gawker. Retrieved from http://gawker.com/5800868/how-google-spies-on-your-gmail-account-and-how-to-stop-it.Google Scholar

Tice, D. M., Butler, J. L., Murayen, M. B., & Stillwell, A. M. (1995). When modesty prevails : Differential favorability of self-presentation to friends and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1120–1138.Google Scholar

Trusov, M., Bodapati, A. V, & Bucklin, R. E. (2010). Determining influential users in Internet social networks. Journal of Marketing Research, XLVII(August), 643–658.Google Scholar

Tufekci, Z. (2008). Grooming, gossip, Facebook and Myspace. Information, Communication & Society, 11(4), 544–564. doi:10.1080/13691180801999050.Google Scholar

Unkelbach, C. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 219–230. doi:10.1037/0278–7393.33.1.219.Google Scholar

Urban, G. L., Sultan, F., & Qualls, W. J. (2000). Placing trust at the center of your Internet strategy. Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 39–48.Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Komanduri, S., Leon, P. G., Norcie, G., Acquisti, A., & Cranor, L. F. (2011). “I regretted the minute I pressed share”: A qualitative study of regrets on Facebook. In Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2011 (pp. 1–13). Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar

Ward, J. C., & Ostrom, A. L. (2006). Complaining to the masses: The role of protest framing in customer-created complaint web sites. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 220–230.Google Scholar

Waytz, A., & Epley, N. (2012). Social connection enables dehumanization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 70–76.Google Scholar

Weaver, K., Garcia, S. M., Schwarz, N., & Miller, D. T. (2007). Inferring the popularity of an opinion from its familiarity: A repetitive voice sounds like a chorus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 821–833.Google Scholar

Weisbuch, M., Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2009). On being liked on the web and in the “real world”: Consistency in first impressions across personal webpages and spontaneous behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 573–576. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.009.Google Scholar

West, P. M., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (1998). Integrating multiple opinions: The role of aspiration level on consumer response to critic consensus. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 38–51.Google Scholar

Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(4), 362–369. doi:10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041.Google Scholar

Wilcox, K., & Stephen, A. T. (2013). Are close friends the enemy? Online social networks, self-esteem, and self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 90–103. doi:10.1086/668794.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203–220. doi:10.1177/1745691612442904.Google Scholar

Wojcieszak, M. (2008). False consensus goes online: Impact of ideologically homogeneous groups on false consensus. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(4), 781–791. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn056.Google Scholar

Wojnicki, A. C., & Godes, D. B. (2011). Signaling Success: Strategically Positive Word of Mouth. Working Paper, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Wood, W., Pool, G. J., Leck, K., & Purvis, D. (1996). Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: The normative impact of majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1181–1193. Retrieved from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8979385.Google Scholar

Wortham, J. (2012). Facebook responds to anger over proposed Instagram changes. New York Times, December 18. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2012/12/19/technology/facebook-responds-to-anger-over-proposed-instagram-changes.html?_r=0.Google Scholar

Yadav, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2014). Marketing in computer-mediated environments: Research synthesis and new directions. Journal of Marketing, 78(1), 20–40. doi:10.1509/jm.12.0020.Google Scholar

Yin, D., Bond, S. D., & Zhang, H. (2014). Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 539–560.Google Scholar

Zhang, J. Q., Craciun, G., & Shin, D. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1336–1341. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.12.011.Google Scholar

Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (Michael). (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(March), 133–148.Google Scholar

Zhu, R. (Juliet), Dholakia, U. M., Chen, X. (Jack), & Algesheimer, R. (2012). Does online community participation foster risky financial behavior? Journal of Marketing Research, XLIX(June), 394–407.Google Scholar

Zinkhan, G. M., Kwak, H., Morrison, M., & Peters, C. O. (2003). Web-based chatting: Consumer communication in cyberspace. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1–2), 17–27.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part II - Interpersonal and Social Consumer Psychology

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Book contents

Part II - Interpersonal and Social Consumer Psychology

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive