Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:29:59.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Parental Autonomy and Relatedness Support

from Part III - Interventions from Educational and Social/Personality Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2020

By
John Mark Froiland
Edited by
Frank C. Worrell ,
Tammy L. Hughes  and
Dante D. Dixson
Frank C. Worrell
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Tammy L. Hughes
Affiliation:
Duquesne University, Pittsburgh
Dante D. Dixson
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access

Summary

Parental autonomy and relatedness support are crucial aspects of parental involvement and address core psychological needs. Although parental autonomy support has been incorporated into successful prevention programs, broader preventive possibilities will be examined. Six parental autonomy support intervention studies have been conducted with mostly middle to high socioeconomic status (SES) students in the United States, Canada, and Italy, yielding positive effects on intrinsic motivation, emotions toward learning, engagement, altruism, and mental health. Although cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have indicated that parental autonomy support promotes positive outcomes among students across all SES levels and in diverse countries, it is time to assess whether parental autonomy support interventions are equally or more effective for youth of low-SES backgrounds, diverse ethnicities, and diverse nationalities. The specific components of parental autonomy support will be discussed, as well as the potential to integrate autonomy supportive parenting with other valuable aspects of parent involvement.

Keywords

parentingparent involvementparent autonomy supporthappinessacademic engagementpsychological needsself-determination theorymotivationinterventionsrelatedness
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Applied School Psychology , pp. 260 - 276
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, I., Patrick, H., Chiu, M. M., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2018). Measuring teacher practices that support student motivation: Examining the factor structure of the teacher as social context questionnaire using multilevel factor analyses. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37, 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918791655Google Scholar
Allen, E. S., Grolnick, W. S., Córdova, J. V. (2019). Evaluating a self-determination theory-based preventive parenting consultation: the parent check-in. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(3), 732–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assemany, A. E., & McIntosh, D. E. (2002). Negative treatment outcomes of behavioral parent training programs. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10032Google Scholar
Battistich, V., Schaps, E., Watson, M., Solomon, D., & Lewis, C. (2000). Effects of the Child Development Project on students’ drug use and other problem behaviors. Journal of Primary Prevention, 21, 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007057414994Google Scholar
Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Kim, D. I., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students’ attitudes, motives, and performance: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 627–658. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003627Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monograph, 4, 1–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030372Google Scholar
Chirkov, V. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russian and US adolescents: Common effects on well-being and academic motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 618–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032005006Google Scholar
Compton, W., & Hoffman, E. (2013). Positive psychology: The science of happiness and flourishing (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., & Nye, B. (2000). Homework in the home: How student, family, and parenting style differences relate to the homework process. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 464–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1036Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627Google Scholar
Dumont, H., Trautwein, U., Nagy, G., & Nagengast, B. (2014). Quality of parental homework involvement: Predictors and reciprocal relations with academic functioning in the reading domain. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, E.H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Fan, W., & Williams, C. M. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self‐efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30, 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903353302Google Scholar
Froh, J. J., Huebner, E. S., Youssef, A. J., & Conte, V. (2011). Acknowledging and appreciating the full spectrum of the human condition: School psychology’s (limited) focus on positive psychological functioning. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20530Google Scholar
Froiland, J. M. (2011). Parental autonomy support and student learning goals: A preliminary examination of an intrinsic motivation intervention. Child & Youth Care Forum, 40, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-010-9126-2Google Scholar
Froiland, J. M. (2013). Homework. In Ainsworth, J. (Ed.), Sociology of education: An A-to-Z guide (pp. 362–363). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452276151.n188Google Scholar
Froiland, J. M. (2014). Inspired childhood: Parents raising motivated, happy, and successful students from preschool to college. Seattle, WA: Amazon.Google Scholar
Froiland, J. M. (2015). Parents’ weekly descriptions of autonomy supportive communication: Promoting children’s motivation to learn and positive emotions. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9819-xGoogle Scholar
Froiland, J. M. (2018a). The intrinsic learning goals of elementary school students, in their own words. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818763923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froiland, J. M. (2018b). Promoting gratitude and positive feelings about learning among young adults. Journal of Adult Development, 25, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-018-9294-0Google Scholar
Froiland, J. M., & Davison, M. L. (2014). Parental expectations and school relationships as contributors to adolescents’ positive outcomes. Social Psychology of Education, 17, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9237-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froiland, J. M., & Davison, M. L. (2016). The longitudinal influences of peers, parents, motivation, and mathematics course-taking on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.012Google Scholar
Froiland, J. M., Davison, M. L., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Aloha teachers: Teacher autonomy support promotes Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander students’ motivation, school belonging, course-taking and math achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 19, 879–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-016-9355-9Google Scholar
Froiland, J. M., & Oros, E. (2014). Intrinsic motivation, perceived competence and classroom engagement as longitudinal predictors of adolescent reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 34, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.822964Google Scholar
Froiland, J. M., Oros, E., Smith, L., & Hirchert, T. (2012). Intrinsic motivation to learn: The nexus between psychological health and academic success. Contemporary School Psychology, 16, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340978Google Scholar
Froiland, J. M., Peterson, A., & Davison, M. L. (2013). The long-term effects of early parent involvement and parent expectation in the USA. School Psychology International, 34, 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034312454361Google Scholar
Froiland, J. M., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school. Psychology in the Schools, 53, 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21901Google Scholar
Froiland, J. M., & Worrell, F. C. (2017). Parental autonomy support, community feeling and student expectations as contributors to later achievement among adolescents. Educational Psychology, 37, 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1214687Google Scholar
Griffith, S. F., & Grolnick, W. S. (2014). Parenting in Caribbean families: A look at parental control, structure, and autonomy support. Journal of Black Psychology, 40, 166–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798412475085Google Scholar
Heatly, M. C., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2017). Parent and teacher-child relationships and engagement at school entry: Mediating, interactive, and transactional associations across contexts. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1042–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000310Google Scholar
Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45, 740–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015362Google Scholar
Jeynes, W. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental involvement programs for urban students. Urban Education, 47, 706–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912445643Google Scholar
Joussemet, M., Landry, R., & Koestner, R. (2008). A self-determination theory perspective on parenting. Canadian Psychology, 49, 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012754Google Scholar
Joussemet, M., Mageau, G. A., & Koestner, R. (2014). Promoting optimal parenting and children’s mental health: A preliminary evaluation of the how-to parenting program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 949–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9751-0Google Scholar
Jungert, T., Landry, R., Joussemet, M., et al. (2015). Autonomous and controlled motivation for parenting: Associations with parent and child outcomes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 1932–1942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-9993-5Google Scholar
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Be careful what you wish for: Optimal functioning and the relative attainment of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. In Schmuck, P. & Sheldon, K. M. (Eds.), Life goals and well-being: Towards a positive psychology of human striving (pp. 116–131). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
Kenney‐Benson, G. A., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2005). The role of mothers’ use of control in children’s perfectionism: Implications for the development of children’s depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality, 73, 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00303.xGoogle Scholar
Kowalski, M. & Froiland, J. M. (2020). Parent perceptions of elementary classroom management systems and their children’s motivational and emotional responses. Social Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09543-5Google Scholar
Lee, A. N., & Nie., Y. (2015) The “why” and “how” of engaging parents in their children’s science learning in informal contexts: Theoretical perspectives and applications. In Kine, M. (Ed.), Science education in East Asia (pp. 93–121). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16390-1_5Google Scholar
Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology 97, 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabbe, E., Soenens, B., De Muynck, G. J., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2018). The impact of feedback valence and communication style on intrinsic motivation in middle childhood: Experimental evidence and generalization across individual differences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 170, 134–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mabbe, E., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., van der Kaap-Deeder, J., & Mouratidis, A. (2018). Day-to-day variation in autonomy-supportive and psychologically controlling parenting: The role of parents’ daily experiences of need satisfaction and need frustration. Parenting, 18, 86–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2018.1444131Google Scholar
Marbell, K. N., & Grolnick, W. S. (2012). Correlates of parental control and autonomy support in an interdependent culture: A look at Ghana. Motivation and Emotion, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9289-2Google Scholar
McIntyre, L. L., & Phaneuf, L. K. (2008). A three-tier model of parent education in early childhood: Applying a problem-solving model. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121407311239Google Scholar
Moè, A., Katz, I., & Alesi, M. (2018). Scaffolding for motivation by parents, and child homework motivations and emotions: Effects of a training programme. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12216Google Scholar
Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., & Litwack, S. D. (2007). The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77, 373–410. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430305567Google Scholar
Pomerantz, E. M., Ng, F. F. Y., Cheung, C. S. S., & Qu, Y. (2014). Raising happy children who succeed in school: Lessons from China and the United States. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12063Google Scholar
Powell, D. R., Son, S. H., File, N., & Froiland, J. M. (2012). Changes in parent involvement across the transition from public school prekindergarten to first grade and children’s academic outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 113, 276–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/667726Google Scholar
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). From ego depletion to vitality: Theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 702–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00098.xGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Schools as contexts for learning and social development. In Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (Eds.), Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness (pp. 351–381). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30, 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.11.001Google Scholar
Su, Y. L., & Reeve, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7Google Scholar
Vansteenkiste, M., Simmons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performing and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.87.2.246Google Scholar
Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W., & Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing? Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468Google Scholar
Webster-Stratton, C., & Taylor, T. (2001). Nipping early risk factors in the bud: Preventing substance abuse, delinquency, and violence in adolescence through interventions targeted at young children (0–8 years). Prevention Science, 2, 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011510923900Google Scholar
Wentzel, K. R., & Brophy, J. E. (2014). Motivating students to learn. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whitney, N., & Froiland, J. M. (2015). Parenting style, gender, beer drinking and drinking problems of college students. International Journal of Psychology: A Biopsychosocial Approach, 16, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.7220/2345-024X.16.5Google Scholar
Won, S., & Yu, S. L. (2018). Relations of perceived parental autonomy support and control with adolescents’ academic time management and procrastination. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.12.001Google Scholar
Worrell, F. C. (2014a). School and academic interventions. In Leong, F. T. L., Comas-Días, L., Nagayama Hall, G. C., McLoyd, V. C., & Trimble, J. E. (Eds.), APA handbook of multicultural psychology, Vol. 2: Applications and training (pp. 543–559). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14187-030Google Scholar
Worrell, F. C. (2014b). Theories school psychologists should know: Culture and academic achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 51, 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuyts, D., Vansteenkiste, M., Mabbe, E., & Soenens, B. (2017). Effects of social pressure and child failure on parents’ use of control: An experimental investigation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.010Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×