Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:13:10.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2020

Young Richard Kim
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select References

Beatrice, Pier Franco. 2002. “The Word ‘Homoousios’ from Hellenism to Christianity.CH 71(2): 243–72.Google Scholar
Bidez, J., ed. 1913. Philostorgius, Kirchengeschichte. GCS 21. Leipzig: Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Bindley, Thomas Herbert. 1899. The Oecumenical Documents of the Faith. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Dossetti, Giuseppe. 1967. Il simbolo di Nicea e di Constantinopoli: Edizione critica. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Edwards Mark, J. 2012. “Alexander of Alexandria and the Homoousion.VC 66(5): 482502.Google Scholar
Heurtley, Charles Able. 1911. De Fide et Symbolo. Oxford: Parker.Google Scholar
Hort, Fenton J. A. 1876. Two Dissertations. Cambridge: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. N. D. 1972. Early Christian Creeds. 3rd ed. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Pietras, Henryk. 2016. Council of Nicaea (325): Religious and Political Context, Documents, Commentaries. Rome: Gregorian and Biblical Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard, and Gaddis, Michael. 2005. The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon. TTH 45. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Siecienski, A. Edward. 2010. The Filioque: History of a Doctrinal Controversy. Oxford Studies in Historical Theology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skarsaune, Oskar. 1987. “A Neglected Detail in the Creed of Nicaea (325).VC 41(1): 3454.Google Scholar
Stead, G. Christopher. 1961. “The Significance of the Homoousios.StPatr 3: 397412.Google Scholar
Stead, G. Christopher. 1998. “The Word ‘From Nothing’.JTS, n.s., 49(2): 671–84.Google Scholar
Thomson, Robert, and Howard-Johnston, James, trans. 1999. The Armenian History Attributed to Sebeos. TTH 31. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Wiles, Maurice F. 1993. “A Textual Variant in the Creed of the Council of Nicaea.StPatr 26: 428–33.Google Scholar

Select References

Alberigo, Giuseppe, and Jedin, Hubert, eds. 1991. Conciliorum oecumenicorum decreta. Bologna: Edizione Dehoniane.Google Scholar
Beneševič, Vladimir. 1937. Ioannis Scholastici Synagoga L titulorum ceteraque eiusdem opera iuridica. Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Philosophisch-Historische Abteilung, Neue Folge 14. Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Beneševič, Vladimir. (1906) 1974. Drevne-slavjanskaja kormcaja XIV titulov bez tolkovanij (Syntagma XIV titulorum sine scholiis secundum versionem Palaeo-Slovenicam, adjecto textu Graeco e vetustissimis codicibus manuscriptis exarato. St. Petersburg, 1906. Reprinted Leipzig: Zentralantiquariat der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik.Google Scholar
Hefele, Carl Joseph von, and Leclercq, Henri. 1907. Histoire des conciles d’après les documents originaux, 1.1. Paris: Letouzey et Ané.Google Scholar
Joannou, Périclès-Pierre, ed. 1963. Discipline générale antique (IVe–IXe s.), vol. 2: Les canons des Pères Grecs. Fonti: Pontificia commissione per la redazione del codice di diritto canonico orientale ser. 1, 9.2. Grottaferrata (Roma): Tipografia Italo-Orientale “S. Nilo.”Google Scholar
Lafontaine, Paul-Henri. 1963. Les conditions positives de l’Accession aux Ordres dans la première legislation ecclésiastique (300–492). Ottawa: Éditions de l’Université d’Ottawa.Google Scholar
L’Huillier, Peter. 1996. The Church of the Ancient Councils: The Disciplinary Work of the First Four Ecumenical Councils. Crestwood, NY: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Google Scholar
Linck, Heinrich. 1908. Zur Übersetzung und Erläuterung der Kanones IV, VI und VII des Konzils von Nicaea. Gießen: Münchow’sche Hof- und Universitäts-Druckerei.Google Scholar
Lübeck, Konrad. 1901. Reichseinteilung und kirchliche Hierarchie des Ostens bis zum Ausgange des vierten Jahrhunderts: Ein Beitrag zur Rechts- und Verfassungsgeschichte der Kirche. Kirchengeschichtliche Studien 5.4. Münster: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Ohme, Heinz. 1998. Kanon ekklesiastikos: Die Bedeutung des altkirchlichen Kanonsbegriff. Arbeiten zur Kirchengeschichte 67. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ohme, Heinz. 2012. “Greek Canon Law to 691/2.” In The History of Byzantine and Eastern Canon Law to 1500, ed. Hartmann, Wilfried and Pennington, Kenneth, 24114. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Poschmann, Bernhard. 1954. “Bußstufen (Bußstationen).” In RAC 2: 814–16.Google Scholar
Tanner, S. J., Norman, P., ed. 1990. Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, vol. 1. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Jörg. 1994. Die Anfänge der abendländischen Rezeption des Nizänums. Patristische Texten und Studien 39. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Weckwerth, Andreas. 2010. Ablauf, Organisation und Selbstverständnis westlicher antiker Synoden im Spiegel ihrer Akten. Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum: Ergänzungsband Kleine Reihe 5. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.Google Scholar
Wohlmuth, Josef, ed. 1998. Dekrete der ökumenischen Konzilien, vol 1. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar

Select References

Barnes, Timothy D. 1981. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil, and Hall, Stuart G., trans. 1999. Eusebius: Life of Constantine. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles. 1943. Bedae opera de temporibus. Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy of America.Google Scholar
Krusch, Bruno. 1880. Studien zur christlich-mittelalterlichen Chronologie: Der 84jährige Ostercyclus und seine Quellen. Leipzig: Veit.Google Scholar
Krusch, Bruno. 1938. Studien zur christlich-mittelalterlichen Chronologie: Die Entstehung unserer heutigen Zeitrechnung. Abhandlungen der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 8. Berlin: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Mc Carthy, Daniel. 1993. “Easter Principles and a Fifth-Century Lunar Cycle Used in the British Isles.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 24: 204–24.Google Scholar
Mc Carthy, Daniel. 2011. “On the Arrival of the Latercus in Ireland.” In The Easter Controversy of Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, ed. Warntjes, Immo and Cróinín, Dáibhí Ó, 4875. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Mc Carthy, Daniel and Breen, Aidan, eds. 2003. The Ante-Nicene Christian Pasch De ratione paschali”: The Paschal Tract of Anatolius, Bishop of Laodicea. Dublin: Four Courts.Google Scholar
Mosshammer, Alden. 2008. The Easter Computus and the Origins of the Christian Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosshammer, Alden, ed. 2017. The Prologues on Easter of Theophilus of Alexandria and [Cyril]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, Archibald, trans. 1892. Athanasius: Select Works and Letters. NPNF 2.4. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Eduard. 1905. Christliche und jüdische Ostertafeln. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, philologisch-historische Klasse, Neue Folge, vol. 8, no. 6. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Eduard, Schwartz and Mommsen, Theodor, eds. 1903–9. Eusebius Werke II.1–3. Die Kirchengeschichte. GCS 9.1–3. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
van der Hagen, Johannes. 1733. Observationes in Prosperi Aquitani Chronicon [] Amsterdam: Johannem Boom.Google Scholar
Walch, Christian. 1770. “Decreti Nicaeni de Paschate Explicatio.” Novum Commentarium Societatis Regiae Scientiarum Goettingensis, commentationes historicae et philologicae 1: 1065. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Select References

Barnes, Timothy D. 1981. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil, and Hall, Stuart G., trans. 1999. Eusebius: Life of Constantine. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dainese, Davide. 2011. “Συνέρχομαι – συγρότησις – σύνοδος. Tre diversi usi della denominazione.Cristianesimo nella storia 32: 875943.Google Scholar
DelCogliano, Mark. 2006. “Eusebian Theologies of the Son as the Image of God before 341.” JECS 14 (4): 458–84.Google Scholar
Drake, H. A. 2000. Constantine and the Bishops: The Politics of Intolerance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Drecoll, Volker Henning. 2013. “How Binitarian/Trinitarian Was Eusebius?” In Eusebius of Caesarea: Tradition and Innovations, ed. Johnson, Aaron P. and Schott, Jeremy, 289305. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies Press.Google Scholar
Irshai, Oded. 2011. “Fourth Century Christian Palestinian Politics.” In Reconsidering Eusebius: Collected Papers on Literary, Historical, and Theological Issues, ed. Inowlocki, Sabrina and Zamagni, Claudio, 2538. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 107. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Hazel. 2016. The Demonic in the Political Thought of Eusebius of Caesarea. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. 2014. Eusebius. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Lyman, Rebecca. 1993. Christology and Cosmology: Models of Divine Activity in Origen, Eusebius and Athanasius. Oxford Theology and Religion Monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morlet, Sébastien. 2009. La Démonstration évangélique d’Eusèbe de Césarée: Étude sur l’apologétique chrétienne à l’époque de Constantin. Collection des Études augustiniennes, Série Antiquité 187. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Spoerl, Kelley McCarthy and Vinzent, Markus, trans. 2017. Eusebius of Caesarea: Against Marcellus and On Ecclesiastical Theology. FC 135. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Strutwolf, Holger. 1999. Die Trinitätstheologie und Christologie des Euseb von Caesarea. Forschungen zur Kirchen- und Dogmengeschichte 72. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, Peter. 2013. “Eusebius and Images of Truth in the Life of Constantine.” In Eusebius of Caesarea: Tradition and Innovations, ed. Johnson, Aaron P. and Schott, Jeremy 133–49. Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael Stuart. 2008. Authorized Lives in Early Christian Biography: Between Eusebius and Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Outcomes
  • Edited by Young Richard Kim
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea
  • Online publication: 17 December 2020
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Outcomes
  • Edited by Young Richard Kim
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea
  • Online publication: 17 December 2020
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Outcomes
  • Edited by Young Richard Kim
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea
  • Online publication: 17 December 2020
Available formats
×