Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:52:28.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Young Popper, 1902–1937: History, Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

By
Malachi Haim Hacohen
Edited by
Jeremy Shearmur  and
Geoffrey Stokes
Jeremy Shearmur
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Geoffrey Stokes
Affiliation:
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Popper , pp. 30 - 68
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassi, J. 1975. ‘Modified Conventionalism’, in his Science in Flux. Boston: Reidel, pp. 365–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agassi, J. 1997. Email to Malachi Haim Hacohen concerning Popper and Duhem. 4 August.Google Scholar
Agassi, J. 1998. Email to Malachi Haim Hacohen concerning Popper’s relationship with Alfred Adler. 6 June.Google Scholar
Anon, ., 1937. ‘Die Philosophen in Paris’, Unidentified Newspaper, 5 August. Popper Collection, Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford University (18, 2).Google Scholar
Ayer, A., ed., 1959. Logical Positivism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bartley, W. 1989. ‘Rehearsing a Revolution: Music and Politics’ (Extract from ‘Karl Popper: A Life’). In: Pacific Regional Meeting of the Mont Pélerin Society. Christchurch: New Zealand 24–27. http://bartleyinstitute.org/shelf/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Rehearsing-a-Revolution.pdf, accessed 15 June 2014.Google Scholar
Bauer, O. 1907. Die Nationalitätenfrage und die Sozialdemokratie. Vienna: Ignaz Brand.Google Scholar
Belke, I. 1978. Die sozialreformerischen Ideen von Josef Popper-Lynkeus (1838–1921) im Zusammenhang mit allgemeinen Reformbestrebungen des Wiener Bürgertums um die Jahrhundertwende. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Blumberg, A. and Feigl, Herbert, 1931. ‘Logical Positivism: A New Movement in European Philosophy’, Journal of Philosophy 28, 281–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borkenau, F. 1962. World Communism: A History of the Communist International. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, J. 1978. ‘Freud, Marriage, and Late Viennese Liberalism’, Journal of Modern History, 50, 72–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, J. 1995. Culture and Political Crisis in Vienna: Christian Socialism in Power, 1897–1918. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Bretenbach, B. 1991. ‘The Long March from Hearth to Heart’, Social Research, 58, 1, 69–83.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. 1918. Die geistige Entwicklung des Kindes. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. 1927. Die Krise der Psychologie. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Burger, E. 1923. Arbeitspädagogik: Geschichte, Kritik, Wegweisung. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1928. Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin: Weltkreis.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1932a. Correspondence with Karl Popper and Otto Neurath, Fall 1932. Carnap Collection, Archives of Scientific Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1932b. ‘Über Protokolsätze’, Erkenntnis 3, 223–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. 1934. Correspondence with Karl Popper, August 1934. Carnap Collection, Archives of Scientific Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Dahms, H.-J. 2006. ‘Karl Poppers erste Schritte in die Philosophie: Leonard Nelsons Paradoxien der Souveränität und Nelsons sowie Poppers Lösungsversuche’, in Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, ed. Jarvie, Ian, Milford, Karl and Miller, David. 3 vols. Hants, England: Ashgate, volume 1, pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
Dahms, H.-J. and Stadler, Friedrich, 1991. ‘Popper und der Wiener Kreis – Aus einem Gespräch mit Sir Karl Popper (1991)’, in Stadler, Friedrich, Studien zum Wiener-Kreis. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 525–45.Google Scholar
Deák, I. 1985. ‘The Habsburg Army in the First and Last Days of World War I: A Comparative Analysis’, in East Central European Society in World War I, ed. Király, B.K. and Dreisinger, N.F.. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 301–12.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. 1919. ‘Induktion und Deduktion in der Logik’, Berliner Tageblatt, 25 December.Google Scholar
Einstein, A. 1920. Relativity: The Special and General Theory. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Fadrus, V. 1926. ‘Die Neugestaltung der Lehrerbildung in Deutschland und Österreich’, Schulreform 5, 1–42.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. 1929. Theorie und Erfahrung in der Physik. Karlsruhe: G. Braun.Google Scholar
Feigl, H. 1969. ‘The “Weiner Kreis” in America’, in The Intellectual Migration: Europe and America, 1930–1960, ed. Fleming, Donald. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1995. ‘Poincaré’s Conventionalism and the Logical Positivists’, Foundations of Science 1, No. 2, 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, J. 1967 [1831]. Neue oder anthropologische Kritik der Vernunft, 2nd ed. Sämtliche Schriften, 29 vols. Aalen: Scientia, pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
Fuchs, A. 1949. Geistige Strömungen in Österreich, 1867–1918. Vienna: Löcker.Google Scholar
Glaser, E. 1981. Im Umfeld des Austromarxismus. Vienna: EuropaverlagGoogle Scholar
Gomperz, H. 1905–08. Weltanschauungslehre. Ein Versuch die Hauptprobleme der allgemeinen theoretischen Philosophie geschichtlich zu entwickeln und sachlich zu bearbeiten. Jena: Diederichs.Google Scholar
Gomperz, H. 1932. Letter to the publisher Mohr, 21 December. Popper Collection, Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford University (300: 9).Google Scholar
Hacohen, M. 1996. ‘Karl Popper in Exile: The Viennese Progressive Imagination and the Making of The Open Society’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26, 452–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacohen, M. 1999. ‘Dilemmas of Cosmopolitanism: Karl Popper, Jewish Identity, and “Central European Culture”’, Journal of Modern History 71, 105–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacohen, M. 2000. Karl Popper – The Formative Years, 1902–1945: Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacohen, M. 2006. ‘The Young Popper as a Scholarly Field: A Comment on Dahms, Hansen, and ter Hark’, in Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, ed. Jarvie, Ian, Milford, Karl and Miller, David. 3 vols. Hants, England: Ashgate Pub. Ltd., volume 1, pp. 99–110.Google Scholar
Hacohen, M. 2007. ‘Rediscovering Intellectual Biography – and Its Limits’, History of Political Economy 39, supplement 1, 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacohen, M. 2013. ‘Karl Popper and the Liberal Imagination: Rationality in Science and Politics’, in I Limiti della Razionalità, ed. Del Castello, Martina and Segre, Michael. Lanciano: Editrice Carabba, pp. 111–32.Google Scholar
Haller, R. and Stadler, Freidrich, eds., 1993. Wein-Berlin-Prag: Der Aufsteig der wissenschaftlichen Philosophie. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. 1999. Letter to Malachi Haim Hacohen, 7 April.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. 2006a. ‘Which Came First, the Problem of Induction or the Problem of Demarcation?’ in Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, ed. Jarvie, Ian, Milford, Karl and Miller, David. 3 vols. Hants, England: Ashgate Pub. Ltd. volume 1, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. 2006b. ‘Nachwort des Herausgebers and Zeittafel’, in Popper, Karl, Frühe Schriften. Gesammelte Werke in deutscher Sprache. 15 vols. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006, 1, pp. 509–46, 547–53.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. 2010. ‘Nachwort des Herausgebers’, in Popper, Karl, Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie, 3rd ed. Gesammelte Werke in deutscher Sprache. 15 vols. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2, pp. 547–625.Google Scholar
Hautmann, H. 1971. Die verlorene Räterepublik: Am Beispiel der Kommunistischen Partei Deutschösterreichs. Vienna: Europa.Google Scholar
Holleis, E. 1978. Die Sozialpolitische Partei: Sozialliberale Bestrebungen in Wien um 1900. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Horak, R. et al., eds., 2000. ‘Introduction’, in Metropole Wien: Texturen der Moderne. Vienna: WUV.Google Scholar
Hubert, R. and Zörrer, Ferdinand, 1983. ‘Die östereichischen Grenzlogen’, Quatuor- Coronati-Jahrbuch 20: 143–66.Google Scholar
Israelitische Kultusgemeinde Wien (IKG). [computerized record]. Matrikenamt, IKG, Vienna.Google Scholar
Jarvie, I, Milford, Karl, and Miller, David, eds., 2006. Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment. 3 vols. Hants, England: Ashgate Pub. Ltd.Google Scholar
Kraft, J. (anon.), 1932. Letter to Karl Popper, 29 July. Popper Collection, Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford University (210: 3).Google Scholar
Kraft, V. 1925. Die Grundformen der Wissenschaftlichen Methoden. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
Kraft, V. 1953. The Vienna Circle. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Kuéss, G. and Scheichelbauer, Bernhard, 1959. 200 Jahre Freimaurerei in Österrich. Vienna: Kerry.Google Scholar
Laurence, R. 1992. ‘Bertha von Suttner and the Peace Movement in Austria to World War I’, Austrian History Yearbook 23, 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford (Hilferding), P., 1999. Interview with Malachi Haim Hacohen at home of Karl Milford (Vienna) (recording tape & typescript.) 30 January.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., 1843. A System of Logic, 2 vols. London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. 1904a. Jakob Friedrich Fries und seine jüngsten Kritiker. Gesammelte Schriften, 9 vols. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1970–74, 1, pp. 79–150.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. 1904b. ‘Die Kritische Methode und das Verhältnis der Psychologie zur Philosophie’, in Gesammelte Schriften, 9 vols. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1970–74, 1, pp. 9–78.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. 1908. Über das sogennante Erkenntnisproblem. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. 1911. ‘Die Unmöglichkeit der Erkenntnistheorie’, in Gesammelte Schriften, 9 vols. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1970–74, 2, pp. 485–501.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. 1928. Politics and Education. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. 1949. ‘The Socratic Method’, in his Socratic Method and Critical Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
Neurath, O. 1935. ‘Pseudorationalismus der Falsifikation’, Erkenntnis 5, 353–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Photos. Popper Collection, Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford University (Envelopes A and BB).Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. 1903. La Science et l’hypothése. Paris: Flammarion, pp. 68–109.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1925. ‘Über die Stellung des Lehrers zu Schule und Schüler. Gesellschaftliche oder individualistische Erziehung?’, in his Frühe Schriften, ed. by Hansen, Troels Eggers. Gesammelte Werke in deutscher Sprache. 15 vols. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006, 1, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1927a. ‘“Gewohnheit” und “Gesetzerlebnis” in der Erziehung’, in his Frühe Schriften, pp. 83–185.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1927b. ‘Zur Philosophie des Heimatgedankens’, in his Frühe Schriften, pp. 10–26.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1928. ‘Zur Methodenfrage der Denkpsychologie’, in his Frühe Schriften, pp. 187–260.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1929. ‘Axiome, Definitionem und Postulate der Geometrie’, in his Frühe Schriften, pp. 263–390.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1931. ‘Die Gedächtnispflege unter dem Gesichtpunkt der Selbsttätigkeit’, in his Frühe Schriften, pp. 27–49.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1932–33. Correspondence with publishers and Julius Kraft concerning Grundprobleme and Logik. Popper Collection, Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford University (17:6, 316:24 under Victor Kraft).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1935. Logik der Forschung: Zur Erkenntnistheorie der modernen Naturwissenschaft. Vienna: Julius Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1942–43. Correspondence with Alfred Braunthal concerning The Open Society. Popper Collection, Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford University (28:2).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1944–45. ‘The Poverty of Historicism I, II, III’, Economica 11, 86–103, 119–37; 12, 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. 2 vols. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1947. Letter to Rudolf Carnap, 6 January. In his After the Open Society, ed. by Shearmur, Jeremy and Turner, Piers Norris. London: Routledge, 2008, pp. 102–05.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1958. ‘On the Status of Science and Metaphysics’, in his Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Basic Books, pp. 249–71.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London; Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1962. ‘Julius Kraft’, in his After the Open Society: Selected Social and Political Writings, ed. Shearmur, Jeremy and Turner, Piers Norris. London: Routledge, 2008, pp. 12–24.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1963. ‘Science: Conjectures and Refutations’, in his Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Basic Books, pp. 43–86.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1967–69. Autobiography: Draft. [typescript.] Popper Collection, Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford University (134:4,11; 135:1).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1972a. Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1972b. ‘On Reason and the Open Society’, Encounter 38: 13–18.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1974. Letter to Alexander Gerschenkron, 24 August. Popper Collection, Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford University (298:31).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1976. Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1979. Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie, ed. Hansen, Troels Eggers. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1981. ‘Preface to Fritz Kolb, Es kam ganz anders’, in his After the Open Society: Selected Social and Political Writings, ed. Shearmur, Jeremy and Turner, Piers Norris. London: Routledge, 2008, pp. 31–34.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1982a. Offene Gesellschaft – offenes Universum: Franz Kreuzer im Gespräch mit Karl R. Popper. Vienna: Deuticke.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1982b. Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics and the Open Universe: an Argument for Indeterminism, ed. Bartley, W. W., III. The Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery. 3 vols. London: Hutchinson, volumes 2–3.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1983. Realism and the Aim of Science, ed. Bartley, W. W., III. The Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery. 3 vols. London: Hutchinson, volume 1.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1984a. Interview with Malachi Haim Hacohen at Popper’s home (Penn). (holograph.). 26 January.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1984b. Letter to John Stachel, 15 March. Popper Collection, Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford University (292:12).Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1991. ‘Ein Gespräch mit Karl R. Popper über Leben und Werk, 31 August 1991’ typescript of interview by Hans-Joachim Dahms and Friedrich Stadler given to Malachi Haim Hacohen by Stadler. Major parts published in: Dahms, Hans-Joachim and Friedrich Stadler, 1991.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 1995. In Memory of Hans Hahn. In Hans Hahn: Collected Works, ed. Schmetterer, Leopold and Sigmund, Karl, 3 vols. Vienna: Springer, volume 1, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 2006. Frühe Schriften, herausgegeben von Troels Eggers Hansen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 2008. After the Open Society, ed. J. Shearmur and P. Turner. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, 2009. The Two Fundamental Problems of the Theory of Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl, n.d. Single page fragment concerning Bühler. [typescript.] Popper Collection, Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford University (3:37).Google Scholar
Popper-Lynkeus, J. 1912. Die Allgemeine Nährpflicht als Lösung der sozialen Frage. Vienna: Rikola.Google Scholar
Ringer, F. 1969. The Decline of the German Mandarins: The German Academic Community, 1890–1933. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scheu, F. 1985. Ein Band der Freundschaft: Schwarzwald-Kreis und die Entstehung der Vereinigung Sozialistischer Mittelschüler. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schlick, M. 1925. Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schorske, C. 1980. Fin-de-siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Silverman, P. 1984. ‘Law and Economics in Interwar Vienna: Kelsen, Mises and the Regeneration of Austrian liberalism’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Stadler, F. 1981. ‘Spätaufklärung und Sozialdemokratie in Wien, 1918–1938’, in Aufbruch und Untergang: österreichische Kultur zwischen 1918 und 1938, ed. Kadrnoska, Franz. Vienna: Europaverlag, pp. 441–73.Google Scholar
Stadler, F. 1982. Vom Positivismus zur ‘Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung’. Vienna: Löcker.Google Scholar
Stadler, F. 1994. ‘Heinrich Gomperz und Karl Popper im Kontext des Logischen Empirismus’, in Heinrich Gomperz, Karl Popper und die Österreichische Philosophie, ed. Seiler, Martin and Stadler, Freidrich. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ter Hark, M. 2006. ‘The Historical Roots of Popper’s Theory of Searchlight’, in Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, ed. Jarvie, Ian, Milford, Karl and Miller, David. 3 vols. Hants, England: Ashgate Pub. Ltd. 1, pp. 37–56.Google Scholar
Transcripts of Karl Popper’s courses at the University of Vienna. Popper Collection, Hoover Institute Archives, Stanford University (335: 19).Google Scholar
Verlassenschaftsakt of Max Schiff. Meldearchiv, Wiener Stadt-und Landesarchiv (MA 8), Vienna.Google Scholar
Verlassenschaftsakt of Simon Popper. Meldearchiv, Wiener Stadt-und Landesarchiv (MA 8), Vienna.Google Scholar
Waismann, F. 1930. ‘Logische Analyse des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs’, Erkenntnis 1, 228–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettersten, J. 1992. The Roots of Critical Rationalism. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilsel, E. 1916. Das Anwendungsproblem. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
Zilsel, E. 1921. ‘Der einführende Philosophieunterricht an den neuen Oberschulen’, Volkserziehung: Pädagogischer Teil 2, 324–41.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×