Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction: Michel Foucault: A user’s manual
- 1 Foucault’s mapping of history
- 2 Foucault and the history of madness
- 3 The death of man, or exhaustion of the cogito? Translated by Catherine Porter
- 4 Power/Knowledge
- 5 Ethics as ascetics: Foucault, the history of ethics, and ancient thought
- 6 The ethics of Michel Foucault
- 7 “What is enlightenment?”: Kant and Foucault
- 8 Modern and countermodern: Ethos and epoch in Heidegger and Foucault
- 9 Foucault and Habermas on the subject of reason
- 10 “Between tradition and oblivion”: Foucault, the complications of form, the literature of reason, and the aesthetics of existence
- 11 Foucault, feminism, and questions of identity
- 12 Foucault, Michel, 1926–Translated by Catherine Porter
- Bibliography
- Index
9 - Foucault and Habermas on the subject of reason
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2012
- Frontmatter
- Introduction: Michel Foucault: A user’s manual
- 1 Foucault’s mapping of history
- 2 Foucault and the history of madness
- 3 The death of man, or exhaustion of the cogito? Translated by Catherine Porter
- 4 Power/Knowledge
- 5 Ethics as ascetics: Foucault, the history of ethics, and ancient thought
- 6 The ethics of Michel Foucault
- 7 “What is enlightenment?”: Kant and Foucault
- 8 Modern and countermodern: Ethos and epoch in Heidegger and Foucault
- 9 Foucault and Habermas on the subject of reason
- 10 “Between tradition and oblivion”: Foucault, the complications of form, the literature of reason, and the aesthetics of existence
- 11 Foucault, feminism, and questions of identity
- 12 Foucault, Michel, 1926–Translated by Catherine Porter
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
But truly to escape Hegel involves an exact appreciation of the price we have to pay to detach ourselves from him. It assumes that we are aware of the extent to which Hegel, insidiously perhaps, is close to us; it implies a knowledge, in that which permits us to think against Hegel, of that which remains Hegelian. We have to determine the extent to which our anti-Hegelianism is possibly one of his tricks directed against us, at the end of which he stands, motionless, waiting for us.
Michel FoucaultFoucault's last attempt to situate his life's work in the Enlightenment tradition presumably laid to rest any lingering doubts about the rational basis of his work. Yet, Habermas and his sympathizers remained skeptical. The rational subject, they argued, was never adequately accounted for in Foucault's work.
Explanation for this discrepancy must be sought in Foucault's original disenchantment with the Enlightenment project – above all, his critique of modern humanism and the kind of subjectivity it entails. For the purposes of this essay, it will suffice to broach this topic by contrasting Foucault's critical method with the critique of ideology undertaken by members of the Frankfurt School (Part I). As we shall see, Foucault's critical method is more radical than theirs in that it brackets the emancipatory ideals underwriting reason itself. Stronger still, it allegedly shows the impossibility of the Hegelian categories of reflection in which these ideals are cast.
I shall argue that these categories are not as paradoxical as Foucault thinks. Indeed, I shall show that, mutatis mutandis, they inform the very hermeneutic circle in which he himself reformulated his understanding of the rational, self-empowering subject. The road leading to this conclusion must pass through the difficult terrain staked out by Habermas's theory of communicative action (Part II). The latter ostensibly redeems reason from its paradoxes while simultaneously demonstrating the self-referential contradictions attending its wholesale rejection.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Foucault , pp. 215 - 261Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1994
- 15
- Cited by