Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:20:18.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part V - Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2023

Edited by
Kai Ambos  and
Peter Rackow
Kai Ambos
Affiliation:
Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
Peter Rackow
Affiliation:
Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law , pp. 327 - 438
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Jan, F. H. Inghelram, Legal and Institutional Aspects of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), Groningen: Europa Law Publishing 2011.Google Scholar
Stefanov, Constantin, White, Simone and Xanthaki, Helen, OLAF at the Crossroads: Action Against EU Fraud, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
OLAF Annual Reports (https://ec.europa.eu/anti-fraud/about-us/reports/annual-olaf-reports_fr).Google Scholar

Further Reading

Casagran, C. Blasi ‘The New Europol Legal Framework: Implications for EU Exchanges of Information in the Field of Law Enforcement’, in O’Neill, M. and Swinton, K. (eds.), Challenges and Critiques of the EU Internal Security Strategy: Rights, Power and Security, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
Brodowski, D. ‘Article 102: Relations with Europol’, in Herrnfeld, H.-H., Brodowski, D. and Burchard, C. (eds.), European Public Prosecutor’s Office: Article-by-Article Commentary, Baden-Baden, München, Oxford: Nomos, Beck, Hart, 2021.Google Scholar
Cocq, C. and Galli F., F., ‘The Evolving Role of Europol in the Fight against Serious Crime: Current Challenges and Future Prospects’, in Hufnagel, S. and McCartney, C. (eds.), Trust in International Police and Justice Cooperation, Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart, 2017.Google Scholar
Cooper, I., ‘A New Form of Democratic Oversight in the EU: The Joint Parliamentary Scrutiny Group for Europol’, (2018) 10 Perspectives on Federalism, 185.Google Scholar
Gless, S., ‘Europol’, in Mitsilegas, V., Bergström, M. and Konstadinides, T. (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law, Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2016.Google Scholar
Gless, S. and Wahl, T., ‘A Comparison of the Evolution and Pace of Police and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters: A Race between Europol and Eurojust?’, in Brière, C. and Weyembergh, A. (eds.), The Needed Balances in EU Criminal Law. Past, Present and Future, Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart, 2018.Google Scholar
Gruszczak, A., ‘The EU Criminal Intelligence Model’, in Banach-Gutierrez, J.B. and Harding, C. (eds.), EU Criminal Law and Policy. Values, Principles and Methods, Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Hufnagel, S. S., Policing Global Regions. The Legal Context of Transnational Law Enforcement Cooperation, Abingdon, Oxon–New York, NY: Routledge, 2020.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, V. and Giuffrida, F., ‘Bodies, Offices and Agencies’, in Mitsilegas, V., EU Criminal Law, 2nd edn., London: Hart, in press.Google Scholar
Vavoula, N. and Mitsilegas, V., ‘Strengthening Europol’s Mandate. A Legal Assessment of the Commission’s Proposal to Amend the Europol Regulation’, Study for the LIBE Committee of the European Parliament, 2021.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Brière, C., ‘Cooperation of Europol and Eurojust with External Partners in the Fight against Crime: A Legal Appraisal’, in Hofmann, H.C.H., Vos, E., and Chamon, M., The External Dimension of EU Agencies and Bodies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019, pp. 59–77.Google Scholar
Coninsx, M., ‘Eurojust’, in Mitsilegas, V., and Bergström, M. (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016, 441–456.Google Scholar
Covolo, V., ‘From Europol to Eurojust: Towards a European Public Prosecutor’, (2012) 7 eucrim, 83–88.Google Scholar
Amicis, G. De, and Kostoris, R., ‘Vertical Cooperation’, in Kostoris, P. (ed.), Handbook of European Criminal Procedure, Cham: Springer, 2018, 223–234.Google Scholar
López, A. Hernández, El papel de Eurojust en la resolución de conflictos de jurisdicción penal en la Unión Europea. Propuestas legislativas, Cizur Menor: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi, 2020, 35–147.Google Scholar
Luchtman, M., and Vervaele, J.A.E., ‘European Agencies for Criminal Justice and Shared Enforcement (Eurojust and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office)’, (2014) 10 Utrecht L. Rev., 132–150.Google Scholar
Suominen, A., ‘The Past, Present and the Future of Eurojust’, (2009 15 Maastricht J. Eur. Comp. L., 217–234.Google Scholar
Weyembergh, A., ‘An Overall Analysis of the Proposal for a Regulation on Eurojust’, (2013) 4 eucrim, 129–130.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Asp, P. (ed.), The European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Legal and Criminal Policy Perspectives, Stockholm: Stiftelsen Skrifter utgivna av Juridiska Fakulteren vid Stockholms Universitet, 2015.Google Scholar
Winter, L. Bachmaier (ed.), The European Public Prosecutor’s Office. The Challenges Ahead, Cham: Springer, 2018.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, M. and Vervaele, J.A.E., The Implementation of the Corpus Juris in the Member States, Vol. I, Cambridge: Intersentia, 2000.Google Scholar
Geelhoed, W., Erkelens, L.H. and Meij, A. (eds.), Shifting Perspectives on the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, The Hague: Asser Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasso, G., Sicurella, R., Illuminati, G., and Allegrezza, S. (eds.), Le sfide dell’attuazione di una Procura europea: definizione di regole comuni e loro impatto sugli ordinamenti interni, Milano: Giuffrè, 2013.Google Scholar
Herrnfeld, H.-H., Brodowski, D. and Burchard, C. (eds.), European Public Prosecutor’s Office: EPPO, Baden Baden: Nomos, 2021.Google Scholar
Ligeti, K. (ed.), Toward a Public Prosecutor for the European Union, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Ligeti, K., Antunes, M.J., and Giuffrida, F., The European Public Prosecutor’s Office at Launch, Milano: Wolter Kluwer, 2020.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, V. and Giuffrida, F. (eds.), ‘Raising the Bar? Thoughts on the Establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office’, (2017) CEPS Research Report www.ceps.eu/system/files/PI%202017-39%20Mitsilegas_Giuffrida_0.pdf (accessed 3 March 2022).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Institutions
  • Edited by Kai Ambos, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany, Peter Rackow, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
  • Online publication: 09 February 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891875.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Institutions
  • Edited by Kai Ambos, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany, Peter Rackow, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
  • Online publication: 09 February 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891875.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Institutions
  • Edited by Kai Ambos, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany, Peter Rackow, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law
  • Online publication: 09 February 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108891875.019
Available formats
×