Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T04:23:20.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2021

Edited by
Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco  and
George Pavlakos
Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
George Pavlakos
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Agency, Negligence and Responsibility , pp. 242 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Allan v. United States, 401 F. Supp.3d 681 [2019].Google Scholar
Bourhill v. Young [1943] AC 92.Google Scholar
Caparo v. Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605.Google Scholar
Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] AC 562; 1932 S.C. (H.L.) 31.Google Scholar
DPP. v. Morgan [1976] UKHL 3.Google Scholar
Hill v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989] 2 All ER 238.Google Scholar
Mansfield v. Weetabix [1998] EWCA Civ 1352.Google Scholar
Nettleship v. Watson [1971] 3 WLR 370.Google Scholar
R v. Adomako 1 AC 191 [1995].Google Scholar
Rainieri v. Miles [1981] AC 1050.Google Scholar
Roberts v. Ramsbottom [1980] 1 WLR 823.Google Scholar
Rylands v. Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1.Google Scholar
Vaughan v. Menlove [1837] 132 ER 490 (CP).Google Scholar
Witzmann v. Adam [2011] WL 322642 (Ohio Ct. App. 2nd Dist.).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Model Penal Code, 2.02.Google Scholar
New York Penal Code, 15.05.04.Google Scholar
Abelard, P., Ethical Writings (Hackett Publishing Co., 1995).Google Scholar
Agule, C., ‘Resisting Tracing’s Siren Song’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 10(1) (2016), pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, L., ‘Insufficient Concern: A Unified Conception of Criminal Culpability’, California Law Review, 88 (2009), pp. 931–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, L., ‘Reconsidering the Relationship among Voluntary Acts, Strict Liability, and Negligence in Criminal Law’, Social Philosophy and Policy, 7 (1990), pp. 85–96.Google Scholar
Alexander, L., and Ferzan, K. K., ‘Against Negligence Liability’, in Robinson, P. H., Garvey, S. P. and Ferzan, K. K. (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 273–294.Google Scholar
Alexander, L., and Ferzan, K. K., ‘Negligence’, in Alexander, L., Ferzan, K. K. and Morse, S. J. (eds.), Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 69–85.Google Scholar
Alexander, L., Ferzan, K. K., and Morse, S. J., Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Amaya, S., ‘Slips’, Noûs, 47(3) (2013), pp. 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M., Intention (Blackwell, 1957).Google Scholar
Archard, D., ‘The Mens Rea of Rape: Reasonableness and Culpable Mistakes’, in Burgess-Jackson, K. (ed.), A Most Detestable Crime: New Philosophical Essays on Rape (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 213–299.Google Scholar
Archard, D., ‘A Nod’s As Good As a Wink: Consent, Convention, and Reasonable Belief’, Legal Theory, 3(3) (1997), pp. 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arpaly, N., ‘Huckleberry Finn Revisited: Inverse Akrasia and Moral Ignorance’, in Clarke, R., McKenna, M. and Smith, A. (eds.), The Nature of Moral Responsibility: New Essays (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 141–156.Google Scholar
Arpaly, N., Merit, Meaning, and Human Bondage: An Essay on Free Will (Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Arpaly, N., Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry into Moral Agency (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Ayars, A., ‘Blaming for Unreasonableness: Accountability without Ill Will’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 19(1) (2021), pp 56–79.Google Scholar
Bach, K., ‘Refraining, Omitting, and Negative Acts’, in O’Connor, T. and Sandis, C. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 50–57.Google Scholar
Baron, M., ‘Culpability, Excuse, and the “Ill Will” Condition’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 88(1) (2014), pp. 91–109.Google Scholar
Baron, M., ‘I Thought She Consented’, Philosophical Issues, 11(1) (2001), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Bennett, C., The Apology Ritual: A Philosophical Theory of Punishment (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Bennett, J., Morality and Consequences: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (University of Utah Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Bentham, J., An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (Payne & Son, 1789).Google Scholar
Björnsson, G., ‘Explaining Away Epistemic Skepticism about Culpability’, in Shoemaker, D. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 141–164.Google Scholar
Borges, J.-L., Ficciones, www.bloomsbury.com/uk/borges-ficciones-9781853995903/.Google Scholar
Bowcott, O., ‘English Judge Says Man Having Sex with Wife Is “Fundamental Human Right”’, The Guardian (3 April 2019), www.theguardian.com/law/2019/apr/03/english-judge-says-man-having-sex-with-wife-is-fundamental-human-right.Google Scholar
Brand, M., ‘The Language of Not Doing’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 8 (1971), pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
Bratman, M., Intentions, Plans and Practical Reason (Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Brownmiller, S., Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape (Fawcett Columbine, 1975).Google Scholar
Brownstein, M., ‘Implicit Bias’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019), plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/implicit-bias/.Google Scholar
Bugbee, J., God’s Patients: Chaucer, Agency, and the Nature of Laws (University of Notre Dame Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Burkeman, O., ‘Five Reasons Why We Should All Learn How to Do Nothing: The Do Something Guide to Doing Nothing’, The Guardian (9 January 2005), www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/jan/09/five-reasons-we-should-all-learn-to-do-nothing.Google Scholar
Carroll, L., Through the Looking Glass (Macmillan, 1871).Google Scholar
Clarke, R., ‘Blameworthiness and Unwitting Omissions’, in Nelkin, D. K. and Rickless, S. C. (eds.), The Ethics and Law of Omissions (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 63–83.Google Scholar
Clarke, R., ‘Ignorance, Revision, and Common Sense’, in Robichaud, P. and Wieland, J. W. (eds.), Responsibility: The Epistemic Condition (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 233–251.Google Scholar
Clarke, R., Omissions: Agency, Metaphysics, and Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Coleman, J., Risks and Wrongs (Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Collins, J., Hall, N., and Paul, L. A., Causation and Counterfactuals (MIT Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Corbetta, M., Patel, G., and Shulman, G., ‘The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind’, Neuron, 58 (2008), pp. 306–324.Google Scholar
Corbetta, M., and Shulman, G., ‘Control of Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Attention in the Brain’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3 (2002), pp. 201–215.Google Scholar
Crampton, G. R., The Condition of Creatures: Suffering and Action on Chaucer and Spenser (Yale University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Danto, A. C., ‘Freedom and Forbearance’, in Lehrer, K. (ed.), Freedom and Determinism (Random House, 1966), pp. 45–63.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, E., Human Acts: An Essay in Their Moral Evaluation (Oxford University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Darwall, S., The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability (Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Darwall, S., and Darwall, J., ‘Civil Recourse and Mutual Accountability’, Florida State University Law Review, 39 (2011), pp. 16–41.Google Scholar
Davidson, D., ‘Actions, Reasons and Causes’, The Journal of Philosophy (1963), pp. 685–700.Google Scholar
Davidson, D., Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd revised ed. (Clarendon Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Davidson, D., ‘The Individuation of Events’, in Rescher, N. (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action (University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967), pp. 115–120.Google Scholar
Davidson, D., ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in Rescher, N. (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action (University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967), pp. 81–95.Google Scholar
Davidson, D., ‘Reply to Bruce Vermazen’, in Vermazen, B., and Hintikka, M. B. (eds.) Essays on Davidson: Actions & Events (Oxford University Press, 1985), pp. 217–221.Google Scholar
Davidson, D., ‘Reply to Jennifer Hornsby’, in Hahn, L. E. (ed.), The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Library of Living Philosophers (Open Court Publishing, 1999), pp. 636–640.Google Scholar
Diamond, D., ‘When a Child Dies of Heatstroke after a Parent or Caretaker Unknowingly Leaves the Child in a Car: How Does It Happen and Is It a Crime?’, Medicine, Science and the Law, 59(2) (2019), pp. 115–126.Google Scholar
Dressler, J., ‘Where We Have Been, and Where We Might Be Going: Some Cautionary Reflections on Rape Law Reform, The Sixty-Eighth Cleveland-Marshall Fund Lecture’, Cleveland State Law Review, 46(3) (1998), pp. 409–442.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A., ‘Choice, Character and Criminal Liability’, Law and Philosophy (1993), pp. 345–383.Google Scholar
Duff, R. A., Intention, Agency, and Criminal Liability: Philosophy of Action and the Criminal Law (Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A., Punishment, Communication, and Community (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Duff, R. A., ‘Recklessness and Rape’, Liverpool Law Review, 3 (1981), pp. 49–64.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
End Violence Against Women Coalition, ‘“Rape Effectively Decriminalised”: Women’s Coalition Demand Action from Prime Minister’, www.endviolenceagainstwomen.org.uk/rape-effectively-decriminalised-womens-coalition-demand-action-from-prime-minister/.Google Scholar
Enoch, D., ‘Being Responsible, Taking Responsibility and Penumbral Agency’, in Heuer, U. and Lang, G. (eds.), Luck, Value, and Commitment: Themes from the Ethics of Bernard Williams (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 95–132.Google Scholar
Estrich, S., ‘Rape’, Yale Law Journal, 95 (1986), pp. 1087–1120.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J., ‘The Expressive Function of Punishment’, Monist, 49(3) (1965), pp. 397–423.Google Scholar
Ferzan, K. K., ‘Opaque Recklessness’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 91(3) (2001), pp. 597–652.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, C., ‘Responsibility for Unintended Consequences’, Ohio St Journal of Criminal Law, 2 (2005), pp. 579–599.Google Scholar
Finnis, J., ‘Law and What I Truly Should Decide’, American Journal of Jurisprudence (2003), pp. 107–129.Google Scholar
Fisher, C., Postcards from the Edge (Simon & Schuster, 1987).Google Scholar
Fisher, J. M., and Ravizza, M., Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Fisher, J. M., and Tognazzi, N. A., ‘The Truth about Tracing’, Noûs (2009), pp. 531–566.Google Scholar
FitzPatrick, W. J., ‘Moral Responsibility and Normative Ignorance: Answering a New Skeptical Challenge’, Ethics, 118 (2008), pp. 589–613.Google Scholar
FitzPatrick, W. J., ‘The Practical Turn in Ethical Theory: Korsgaard’s Constructivism, Realism and the Nature of Normativity’, Ethics, 115(4) (2005), pp. 651–691.Google Scholar
FitzPatrick, W. J., ‘Unwitting Wrongdoing, Reasonable Expectations and Blameworthiness’, in Robichaud, P. and Wieland, J. W. (eds.), Responsibility: The Epistemic Condition (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G., ‘Toward a Theory of Criminal Negligence’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 119(3) (1971), pp. 401–438.Google Scholar
Foot, P., ‘Killing and Letting Die’, in Garfield, J. (ed.), Abortion: Moral and Legal Perspectives (University of Massachusetts Press, 1985), pp. 177–185.Google Scholar
Gardner, J., ‘Hart and Feinberg on Responsibility’, in Kramer, M., Grant, C., Colburn, B. and Hatzistavrou, A. (eds.), The Legacy of H. L. A. Hart (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 121–141.Google Scholar
Gardner, J., ‘The Mark of Responsibility’, in Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 177–200.Google Scholar
Gardner, J., ‘The Negligence Standard: Political, Not Metaphysical’, Modern Law Review, 80 (2017), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Gardner, J., ‘Obligations and Outcomes in the Law of Torts’, in Cane, P., and Gardner, J. (eds.), Relating to Responsibility: Essays for Tony Honoré (Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 111–144.Google Scholar
Gardner, J., “What Is Tort Law For? Part 1: The Place of Corrective Justice’, Law and Philosophy, 30 (2011), pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
Gardner, J., ‘The Wrongdoing That Gets Results’, Philosophical Perspectives, 18 (2004), pp. 53–88.Google Scholar
Garvey, S., ‘What’s Wrong with Involuntary Manslaughter?’, Texas Law Review, 85 (2006), pp. 333–383.Google Scholar
Gazzaley, A., ‘Influence of Early Attentional Modulation on Working Memory’, Neuropsychologia, 49 (2011), pp. 1410–1424.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. C. P., and Zipursky, B. C., The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Torts (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. C. P., and Zipursky, B. C., ‘The Strict Liability in Fault and the Fault in Strict Liability’, Fordham Law Review, 85 (2016), pp. 743–788.Google Scholar
Goldberg, J. C. P., and Zipursky, B. C., ‘Tort Law and Moral Luck’, Cornell Law Review, 92 (2008), p. 1123.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I., A Theory of Human Action (Princeton University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, T., ‘A Demonstration of the Causal Power of Absences’, Dialectica, 70(1) (2016), pp. 85–95.Google Scholar
Graham, P. A., ‘A Sketch of a Theory of Moral Blameworthiness’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(2) (2014), pp. 388–409.Google Scholar
Green, O. H., ‘Killing and Letting Die’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 17 (1980), pp. 195–204.Google ScholarPubMed
Green, S., Causation in Negligence (Hart Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar
Grubb, A., and Turner, E., ‘Attribution of Blame in Rape Cases: A Review of the Impact of Rape Myth Acceptance, Gender Role Conformity and Substance Use on Victim Blaming’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5) (2012), pp. 443–452.Google Scholar
Hahn, L. E. (ed.), The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Library of Living Philosophers (Open Court Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Negligence, Mens Rea, and Criminal Responsibility’, in Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law (Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 136–157.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Negligence, Mens Rea and Criminal Responsibility’, in Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 136–157.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Elements of the Philosophy of Right [1821], edited by Wood, A. W., translated by H. B. Nisbet (Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., ‘What Is Metaphysics?’ [1929], translated by D. F. Krell, in Krell, D. F. (ed.), Heidegger: Basic Writings (Harper Collins, 1977), pp. 89–110.Google Scholar
Henderson, L., ‘Rape and Responsibility’, Law and Philosophy, 11(1/2) (1992), pp. 127–178.Google Scholar
Herstein, O., ‘Nobody’s Perfect: Moral Responsibility in Negligence’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 32(1) (2019), pp. 109–125.Google Scholar
Herstein, O., ‘Responsibility in Negligence: Discussion of From Normativity to Responsibility’, Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies, 8 (2013), pp. 167–184.Google Scholar
Heyer, G., Arabella (A. Millar & Co., 1949).Google Scholar
Hieronymi, P., ‘Rational Capacities as a Condition on Blame’, Philosophical Books, 48(2) (2007), pp. 109–123.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, C. (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science (Blackwell, 2004).Google Scholar
Homer, , The Odyssey, translated by E. V. Rieu, revised by D. C. H. Rieu and P. Jones (Penguin, 1946; 2003).Google Scholar
Honoré, T., Responsibility and Fault (Hart Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar
Honoré, T., ‘Responsibility and Luck: The Moral Basis of Strict Liability’, Law Quarterly Review, 104 (1988), pp. 530–553.Google Scholar
Hornsby, J., Actions (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980).Google Scholar
Hornsby, J., ‘Anomalousness in Action’, in Hahn, L. E. (ed.), The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Library of Living Philosophers (Open Court Publishing, 1999), pp. 623–635.Google Scholar
Hornsby, J., ‘Basic Activity’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 87(1) (2013), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Hornsby, J., ‘On What’s Intentionally Done’, in Shute, S., Gardner, J. and Horder, J. (eds.), Action and Value in Criminal Law (Clarendon Press, 1993), pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
Hornsby, J., ‘Thinkables’, in Sainsbury, M. (ed.), Thought and Ontology (Franco Angeli, 1997), pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
Huigens, K., ‘Is Strict Liability Rape Defensible?’, in Duff, R. A. and Green, S. (eds.), Defining Crimes: Essays on The Special Part of the Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 196–217.Google Scholar
Hume, David. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, edited by Beauchamp, T. L. (Clarendon, 2000).Google Scholar
Hurd, H. M., ‘Finding No Fault with Negligence’, in Oberdiek, J. (ed), Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 387–405.Google Scholar
Hurd, H. M., ‘The Innocence of Negligence’, Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 8(2) (2016), pp. 48–95.Google Scholar
Hurd, H. M., and Moore, M., ‘Punishing the Awkward, the Stupid, the Weak and the Selfish: The Culpability of Negligence’, Criminal Law and Philosophy (2011), pp. 147–198.Google Scholar
Husak, D., Ignorance of Law: A Philosophical Inquiry (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Husak, D., ‘Negligence, Belief, Blame and Criminal Liability: The Special Case of Forgetting’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 5 (2011), pp. 199–218.Google Scholar
Husak, D., and Thomas, G. C., ‘Rapes without Rapists: Consent and Reasonable Mistake’, Philosophical Issues, 11(1) (2001), pp. 86–117.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. J. (trans.), The Bhagavad Gita (Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Julius, A. J., ‘Independent People’, in Kisilevsky, S. and Stone, M. (eds.), Freedom and Force: Essays on Kant’s Legal Philosophy (Hart Publishing, 2017), pp. 91–110.Google Scholar
Julius, A. J., ‘The Possibility of Exchange’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 12 (2013), pp. 361–374.Google Scholar
Julius, A. J., ‘Reconstruction’ (book ms., December 7, 2013 draft), www.ajjulius.net/reconstruction.pdf.Google Scholar
Kane, R., The Significance of Free Will (Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Kant, I., ‘The Metaphysics of Morals’, in Gregor, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Edition of the Works of I Kant (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Katz, J., The Macho Paradox (Sourcebooks, 2006).Google Scholar
Keating, G., ‘Strict Liability Wrongs’, in Oberdiek, J. (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts (Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 292–311.Google Scholar
Khoury, A., ‘Responsibility, Tracing, and Consequences’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 3–4 (2012), pp. 187–207.Google Scholar
King, M., ‘Getting Traction without Tracing: A (Partial Solution for Control-Based Accounts of Moral Responsibility’, European Journal of Philosophy, 22(3) (2014), pp. 463–482.Google Scholar
King, M., ‘The Problem with Negligence’, Social Theory and Practice, 35(4) (2009), pp. 577–595.Google Scholar
King, M., ‘Tracing the Epistemic Condition’, Robichaud, P. and Wieland, J. W. (eds.), Responsibility: The Epistemic Condition (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 266–280.Google Scholar
King, M., and Carruthers, P., ‘Moral Responsibility and Consciousness’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, 9 (2012), pp. 200–228.Google Scholar
King, M., and Carruthers, P., ‘Responsibility and Consciousness’, in Nelkin, D. K., and Pereboom, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Moral Responsibility (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C., Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C., ‘Skepticism about Practical Reason’, Journal of Philosophy, 83 (1986), pp. 5–25.Google Scholar
Laitinen, A., and Sandis, C., ‘Hegel on Purpose’, Hegel Bulletin, 40(3) (2019), pp. 444–463.Google Scholar
Lehrer, K. (ed.), Freedom and Determinism (Random House, 1966).Google Scholar
Levy, N., Consciousness and Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Levy, N., ‘Culpable Ignorance and Moral Responsibility: A Reply to FitzPatrick’, Ethics 119 (2009), pp. 729–741.Google Scholar
Lewis, D., ‘Void and Object’, in Collins, J., Hall, N. and Paul, L. A. (eds.), Causation and Counterfactuals (MIT Press, 2004), pp. 277–290.Google Scholar
Luban, D., ‘Contrived Ignorance’, The Georgetown Law Journal, 87 (1999), pp. 957–980.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R., The Mind of a Mnemonist: A Little Book about a Vast Memory, translated by J. S. Bruner, revised ed. (Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
MacCormick, N., Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
MacCormick, N., ‘Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers I’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 46 (1972), pp. 59–78.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, C. A., Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (Harvard University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Macmurray, J., ‘What Is Action?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 27 (1938), pp. 69–85.Google Scholar
Maitra, I., and McGowan, M. K., ‘On Silencing, Rape, and Responsibility’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 88(1) (2010), pp. 167–172.Google Scholar
Mason, E., ‘Moral Ignorance and Blameworthiness’, Philosophical Studies (2015), pp. 3037–3057.Google Scholar
McEwan, I., The Children Act (Vintage, 2014).Google Scholar
McGeer, V., and Petitt, P., ‘The Hard Problem of Responsibility’, in Shoemaker, D. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, vol. iii (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
McGrath, S., ‘Causation by Omission: A Dilemma’, Philosophical Studies, 123 (2005), pp. 125–148.Google Scholar
McKenna, M., ‘Putting the Lie on the Control Condition for Moral Responsibility’, Philosophical Studies, 139 (2008), pp. 29–37.Google Scholar
Menon, V., and Uddin, L., ‘Saliency, Switching, Attention and Control: A Network Model of Insula Function’, Brain Structure and Function, 214 (2010), pp. 655–667.Google Scholar
Michaels, A., ‘Acceptance: The Missing Mental State’, Southern California Law Review, 71 (1988), pp. 953–1035.Google Scholar
Montmarquet, J., Epistemic Virtue and Doxatic Responsibility (Rowman & Littlefield, 1993).Google Scholar
Montmarquet, J., ‘Huck Finn, Aristotle, and Anti-Intellectualism in Moral Psychology’, Philosophy, 87(1) (2012), pp. 51–63.Google Scholar
Moore, R. E., ‘Refraining’, Philosophical Studies, 36 (1979), pp. 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morkel, D., ‘On the Distinction between Recklessness and Conscious Negligence’, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 30(2) (1982), pp. 325–333.Google Scholar
Moss, J., Aristotle on the Apparent Good (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Mulhall, S., Inheritance and Originality (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Murray, S., ‘The Place of the Trace’, Review of Philosophy and Psychology (2020).Google Scholar
Murray, S., ‘Responsibility and Vigilance’, Philosophical Studies, 174(2) (2017), pp. 507–527.Google Scholar
Murray, S., and Vargas, M., ‘Vigilance and Control’, Philosophical Studies, 177 (2020), pp. 825–843.Google Scholar
Nagel, T., ‘Moral Luck’, in Mortal Questions (Cambridge University Press, 1979), pp. 24–38.Google Scholar
Nagel, T., The View from Nowhere (Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Nelkin, D. K., ‘Moral Luck’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019), plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/moral-luck/.Google Scholar
Nelkin, D. K., and Rickless, S. C. (eds.), The Ethics and Law of Omissions (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Nelkin, D. K., and Rickless, S. C. ‘Moral Responsibility for Unwitting Omissions: A New Tracing View’, in Nelkin, D. K., and Rickless, S. C. (eds.), The Ethics and Law of Omissions (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 106–129.Google Scholar
Neuman, A. (trans.), The Things We Don’t Do (Pushkin Press, 2014).Google Scholar
O’Connor, T., and Sandis, C. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, B., The Will: A Dual Aspect Theory, vol. i (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Oberdiek, J., Imposing Risk: A Normative Framework (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Otterman, S., and Salcedo, A., ‘Investigation Continuing in Death of Twins in Car’, New York Times (August 2, 2019).Google Scholar
Pavlakos, G., ‘A Plea for Moderate Optimisation’, in Borowski, M., Paulson, S. L. and Sieckmann, J. R. (eds), Rechsphilosophie und Grundrechtstheorie. Robert Alexys System (J C B Mohr Verlag, 2018), pp. 394–410.Google Scholar
Pavlakos, G., ‘Redrawing the Legal Relation’, in Zambrano, J. F. (ed.), Jurisprudence and Political Philosophy in a Globalized World (Edward Elgar, 2020), 174–194.Google Scholar
Perry, S., ‘Honoré on Responsibility for Outcomes’, in Cane, P. and Gardner, J. (eds.), Relating to Responsibility – Essays for Tony Honoré (Hart Publishing, 2001), pp. 61–80.Google Scholar
Perry, S., ‘Responsibility for Outcomes, Risk and the Law of Torts’, in Postema, G. (ed.), Philosophy and the Law of Torts (Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 72–130.Google Scholar
Pettigrove, G., and Collins, J., ‘Apologizing for Who I Am’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 28(2) (2011), pp. 137–150.Google Scholar
Pineau, L., ‘Date Rape: A Feminist Analysis’, Law and Philosophy, 8(2) (1989), pp 217–243.Google Scholar
Plato, , The Sophist, translated by F. M. Cornford (Routledge & Keagan Paul, 1935).Google Scholar
Prabhupada, A. C. B. A., Bhagavad Gītā As It Is, 2nd ed. (The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust, 1972).Google Scholar
Railton, P., ‘Practical Competence and Fluent Agency’, in Sobel, D. and Wall, S. (eds.), Reasons for Action (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 81–115.Google Scholar
Raz, J., ‘Agency and Luck’, in Heuer, U. and Lang, G. (eds.), Luck, Value, and Commitment: Themes from the Ethics of Bernard Williams (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 133–162.Google Scholar
Raz, J., ‘Being in the World’, Ratio, 23 (2010), pp. 433–452.Google Scholar
Raz, J., From Normativity to Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Raz, J., ‘On the Guise of the Good’, in From Normativity to Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Raz, J., ‘Responsibility and the Negligence Standard’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30(1) (2010), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Richardson, S., Clarissa (William Heinemann, 1748).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., From Text to Action, translated by K. Blamey, and J. B. Thompson (The Athlone Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Ripstein, A., Private Wrongs (Harvard University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Roberts, R. C., Emotions: An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Robichaud, P., and Wieland, J. W. (eds.), Responsibility: The Epistemic Condition (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Blanco, V., ‘Is Practical Knowledge Prior to Theoretical Knowledge in Action? Reflecting on Anscombe’s Institutional Transparency’, Journal of Value Inquiry (2018), pp. 257–267.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Blanco, V., Law and Authority under the Guise of the Good (Hart Publishing, 2014).Google Scholar
Rosen, G., ‘The Alethic Conception of Blameworthiness’, in Clarke, R., McKenna, M. and Smith, A. (eds.), The Nature of Moral Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 65–88.Google Scholar
Rosen, G., ‘Culpability and Duress: A Case Study’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary, 88 (2014). doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2014.00233.x.Google Scholar
Rosen, G., ‘Culpability and Ignorance’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 103(1) (2002), pp. 61–84.Google Scholar
Rosen, G., ‘Kleinbart the Oblivious and Other Tales of Ignorance and Responsibility’, Journal of Philosophy, 105(10) (2008), pp. 591–610.Google Scholar
Rosen, G., ‘Skepticism about Moral Responsibility’, Philosophical Perspectives, 18(1) (2004), pp. 295–313.Google Scholar
Russell, B., ‘The Philosophy of Logical Atomism’, in Russell, B., and Marsh, R. C. (eds.), Logic & Knowledge (Allen & Unwin, 1956), pp. 177–281.Google Scholar
Ryle, G., ‘Negative Actions’, Hermathena, 115 (1973), pp. 81–93.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., ‘On Doing “Being Ordinary”’, in Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 1984), pp. 413–429.Google Scholar
Sacks, O., Awakenings, revised ed. (Harper Collins, 1990).Google Scholar
Sandis, C., ‘Basic Actions and Individuation’, in O’Connor, T., and Sandis, C. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 10–17.Google Scholar
Sandis, C., Character and Causation: Hume’s Philosophy of Action (Routledge, 2019).Google Scholar
Sandis, C., ‘The Doing and the Deed: Action in Normative Ethics’, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 80 (2017), pp. 105–126.Google Scholar
Sandis, C., ‘He Buttered the Toast While Baking A Fresh Loaf’, Philosophy and Public Issues (New Series), Supplementary Volume (2015), pp. 27–43.Google Scholar
Sandis, C., ‘The Man Who Mistook His Handlung for a Tat: Hegel on Oedipus and Other Tragic Thebans’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, 62 (2010), pp. 35–60.Google Scholar
Sandis, C., ‘Motivated by the Gods: Compartmentalized Agency & Responsibility’, in Buckareff, A., Moya, C. and Rosell, S. (eds.), Agency and Responsibility (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015). doi.org/10.1057/9781137414953_15.Google Scholar
Sandis, C., ‘The Things We Do and Why We Do Them (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).Google Scholar
Sarch, A., ‘Willful Ignorance, Culpability and the Criminal Law’, St. Johns Law Review, 88(4) (2014), pp. 1023–1101.Google Scholar
Sarch, A., ‘Willful Ignorance in Law and Morality’, Philosophy Compass, 13(5) (2018). doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12490.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame (Harvard University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., ‘Reasons and Passions’, in Buss, S. and Overton, L. (eds.), Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt (MIT Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., What We Owe to Each Other (Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, A., Parerga and Paralipomena, translated by E. F. J. Payne (Oxford University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Schroeder, M., ‘Having Reasons’, Philosophical Studies, 139(1) (2008), pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
Shelby, T., ‘Ideology, Racism, and Critical Social Theory’, Philosophical Forum, 34(2) (2003), pp. 153–188.Google Scholar
Shepherd, J., ‘Consciousness, Free Will, and Moral Responsibility: Taking the Folk Seriously’, Philosophical Psychology, 28(7) (2015), pp. 929–946.Google Scholar
Sher, G., In Praise of Blame (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Sher, G., ‘Out of Control’, Ethics (2006), pp. 285–301.Google Scholar
Sher, G., Who Knew? Responsibility without Awareness (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Shiffrin, S., ‘The Moral Neglect of Negligence’, in Sobel, D., Vallentyne, P. and Wall, S. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2016), vol. iii, pp. 197–228.Google Scholar
Shute, S., Gardner, J., and Horder, J. (eds.), Action and Value in Criminal Law (Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Simester, A., ‘Responsibility for Inadvertent Acts’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law (2005), pp. 601–606.Google Scholar
Simons, K., ‘Culpability and Retributive Theory: The Problem of Criminal Negligence’, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues (1994), pp. 365–398.Google Scholar
Simons, K., ‘Rethinking Mental States’, Boston University Law Review, 72 (1992), pp. 463–554.Google Scholar
Smith, A., ‘On Being Responsible and Holding Responsible’, Journal of Ethics, 11 (2004), pp. 465–484.Google Scholar
Smith, A., ‘Responsibility for Attitudes: Activity and Passivity in Mental Life’, Ethics, 115 (2005), pp. 236–271.Google Scholar
Smith, A., ‘Responsibility as Answerability’, Inquiry, 58 (2015), p. 99.Google Scholar
Smith, A., ‘Unconscious Omissions, Reasonable Expectations, and Responsibility’, in Nelkin, D. K. and Rickless, S. C. (eds.), The Ethics and Law of Omissions (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 36–62.Google Scholar
Smith, H. M., ‘Culpable Ignorance’, Philosophical Review, 92 (1983), pp. 543–571.Google Scholar
Smith, H. M., ‘Negligence’, in LaFollette, H. (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics (Wiley-Blackwell, 2013).Google Scholar
Smith, H. M., ‘Non-tracing Cases of Culpable Ignorance’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 5 (2011), pp. 115–146.Google Scholar
Smith, M., ‘Highest-earning Tory MP Forgot to Declare £400,000 Income but Remembered to Claim 49p for Milk’, The Mirror (February 4, 2016), www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/highest-earning-tory-mp-forgot-7308164.Google Scholar
Smith, M., ‘Rational Capacities: Or How to Distinguish Recklessness, Weakness, and Compulsion’, in Tappolet, C. and Stroud, S. (eds.), Weakness of Will and Irrationality (Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
Smith, P., ‘Contemplating Failure: The Importance of Unconscious Omissions’, Philosophical Studies, 59 (1990), pp. 159–176.Google Scholar
Smith, P., ‘Omission and Responsibility in Legal Theory’, Legal Theory, 9 (2003), pp. 221–240.Google Scholar
Smith, S., Contract Theory (Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Stark, F., Culpable Carelessness (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Strabbing, J., Moral Responsibility: Attributability, Accountability and Capacities (Princeton University Dissertation, 2011).Google Scholar
Strawson, G., Things That Bother Me (New York Review Books, 2018).Google Scholar
Strawson, P., ‘Freedom and Resentment’, Proceedings of the British Academy, 48 (1962), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Strawson, P., ‘Freedom and Resentment’, repr. in Watson, G. (ed.), Free Will (Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 72–93.Google Scholar
Strawson, P., ‘Freedom and Resentment’, repr. in McKenna, M. and Russell, P. (eds.), Free Will and the Reactive Attitudes: Perspectives on P. F. Strawson’s ‘Freedom and Resentment’ (Ashgate, 2008), pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
Sverdlik, S., ‘Pure Negligence’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 30(2) (1993), pp. 137–149.Google Scholar
Tadros, V., Criminal Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Talbert, M., ‘Akrasia, Awareness and Blameworthiness’, in Robichaud, P., and Wieland, J. W. (eds.), Responsibility: The Epistemic Condition (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 47–63.Google Scholar
Talbert, M., ‘Omission and Attribution Error’, in Nelkin, D. K. and Rickless, S. C. (eds.), The Ethics and Law of Omissions (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 17–35.Google Scholar
Tamber-Rosenau, B., Esterman, M., Chiu, Y.-C., and Yantis, S., ‘Cortical Mechanisms of Cognitive Control for Shifting Attention in Vision and Working Memory’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 (2011), pp. 2905–2919.Google Scholar
Temkin, J., and Krahe, B., Sexual Assault and the Justice Gap: A Question of Attitude (Hart Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, S., Desire, Practical Reason and the Good (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Terzaghi, M., Sartori, I., Tassi, L., Rustoni, V., Proserpio, P., Lorusso, G., Manni, R., and Nobili, L., ‘Dissociated Local Arousal States Underlying Essential Clinical Features of Non-rapid Eye Movement Arousal Parasomnia: An Intracerebral Stereo-electroencephalographic Study’, Journal of Sleep Research, 21 (2012), pp. 502–506.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. J., ‘Causation: Omissions’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66 (2003), pp. 81–103.Google Scholar
Unsworth, N., Fukuda, K., Awh, E., and Vogel, E., ‘Working Memory Delay Activity Predicts Individual Differences in Cognitive Abilities’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27 (2015), pp. 853–865.Google Scholar
Upper, D., ‘The Unsuccessful Self-Treatment of a Case of “Writer’s Block”’, Journal of Applied Behavioural Analysis, 3(7) (1974), p. 497.Google Scholar
Vargas, M., ‘On the Importance of History for Responsible Agency’, Philosophical Studies (2006), pp. 351–382.Google Scholar
Vargas, M., ‘The Trouble with Tracing’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 29(1) (2005), pp. 269–290.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. D., ‘Doables’, Philosophical Explorations, 17(1) (2014), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Vermazen, B., ‘Negative Acts’, in Vermazen, B. and Hintikka, M. B. (eds.), Essays on Davidson: Actions & Events (Oxford University Press, 1985), pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
Vermazen, B., and Hintikka, M. B. (eds.), Essays on Davidson: Actions & Events (Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Vogt, K., Desiring the Good (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Von Wright, G. H., Norm and Action (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963).Google Scholar
Voyiakis, E., Private Law and the Value of Choice (Hart Publishing, 2017).Google Scholar
Waldron, J., ‘Moments of Carelessness and Massive Losses’, in Owen, D. (ed.), The Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 387–408.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. J., Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments (Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Watson, G., ‘Raz on Responsibility’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 10(3) (2016), pp. 395–409.Google Scholar
Watson, G., ‘Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme’, repr. in Watson, G., Agency and Answerability: Selected Essays (Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 219–259.Google Scholar
Watson, G., ‘Two Faces of Responsibility’, repr. in Watson, G., Agency and Answerability. Selected Essays (Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 260–288.Google Scholar
Weingarten, G., ‘Fatal Distraction: Forgetting a Child in the Backseat of a Car Is a Horrifying Mistake. Is It a Crime?’, Washington Post (March 8, 2009).Google Scholar
Weinrib, E., The Idea of Private Law (Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Weinrib, E., The Idea of Private Law, revised ed. (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Weisbord, M., and Janoff, S., Don’t Just Do Something, Stand There: Ten Principles for Leading Meetings That Matter (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2007).Google Scholar
Wideman, J. E., Brothers and Keepers, First Mariners Book Edition (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2005).Google Scholar
Wieland, J. W., ‘Introduction’, in Robichaud, P., and Wieland, J. W. (eds.), Responsibility: The Epistemic Condition (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Williams, B., ‘Moral Luck’, in Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980 (Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 20–39.Google Scholar
Williams, B., ‘Persons, Character and Morality’, in Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980 (Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Williams, B., Shame and Necessity (University of California Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Williams, B., ‘Voluntary Acts and Responsible Agents’, in Making Sense of Humanity (Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 22–34.Google Scholar
Williams, B., ‘What Has Philosophy to Learn from Tort Law?’, in Owen, D. (ed.), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 487–498.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, translated by E. Anscombe, 3rd ed. (Blackwell, 2001).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, revised translation by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuiness (Routledge, 1961).Google Scholar
Wolf, S., ‘The Moral of Moral Luck’, Philosophical Exchange, 31 (2013) https://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=phil_ex.Google Scholar
Woollard, F., Doing and Allowing Harm (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Woollard, F., and Howard-Snyder, D., ‘Doing vs. Allowing Harm’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/doing-allowing.Google Scholar
Yaffe, G., The Age of Culpability (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Yaffe, G., ‘Intoxication, Recklessness, and Negligence’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 9(2) (2012), pp. 545–583.Google Scholar
Yaffe, G., ‘The Point of Mens Rea: The Case of Willful Ignorance’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 12(1) (2008), pp. 19–44.Google Scholar
Zamir, T., Double Vision: Moral Philosophy & Shakespearean Drama (Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M., ‘Moral Responsibility and Ignorance’, Ethics, 107(3) (1997), pp. 410–426.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M., ‘Morality Responsibility and the Quality of Will’, in Robichaud, P. and Wieland, J. W. (eds.), Responsibility: The Epistemic Condition (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 219–232.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M., ‘Negligence and Moral Responsibility’, Noûs, 20 (1986), pp. 199–218.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M., ‘Omissions, Agency and Control’, in Nelkin, D. K. and Rickless, S. C. (eds.), The Ethics and Law of Omissions (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 84–105.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M., ‘Varieties of Moral Responsibility’, in Clarke, R., McKenna, M. and Smith, A. (eds.), The Nature of Moral Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 45–64.Google Scholar
Zipursky, B. C., ‘Reasonableness in and out of Negligence Law’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 163 (2015), pp. 2131–2170.Google Scholar
Zipursky, B. C., ‘The Restatement (Third) and the Place of Duty in Negligence Law’, Vanderbilt Law Review (2001), pp. 658–750.Google Scholar
Zipursky, B. C., ‘Rights, Wrongs, and Recourse in the Law of Torts’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 51 (1998), pp. 1–100.Google Scholar
Zipursky, B. C., ‘Sleight of Hand’, William & Mary Law Review (2007), pp. 1999–2041.Google Scholar
Zipursky, B. C., ‘Two Dimensions of Responsibility in Crime, Tort and Moral Luck’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 9 (2007), pp. 97–137.Google Scholar
Zipursky, B. C., and Goldberg, J. C. P., Recognizing Wrongs (Harvard University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×