Book contents
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine
- Series page
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Section I Limits for IVF
- 1A Female Age 42 Years Should Be the Upper Limit for Conventional IVF/ICSI Treatment
- 1B Female Age 42 Years Should Be the Upper Limit for Conventional IVF/ICSI Treatment
- 2A Women with a BMI over 40 Should Be Refused Fertility Treatment
- 2B Women with a BMI over 40 Should Be Refused Fertility Treatment
- 3A Female Age of Menopause Is a Fair Limit for Ovum Donation
- 3B Female Age of Menopause Is a Fair Limit for Ovum Donation
- 4A Social Egg Freezing Should Be Available Up To the Age of 40 Years
- 4B Social Egg Freezing Should Be Available Up To the Age of 40 Years
- Section II IVF Add-ons
- Section III The Best Policy
- Section IV Embryology
- Section V Ethics and Statistics
- Section VI Male-factor Infertility
- Section VII Genetics
- Section VIII Ovarian Stimulation
- Section IX Hormones and the Environment
- Index
- References
2B - Women with a BMI over 40 Should Be Refused Fertility Treatment
Against
from Section I - Limits for IVF
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 November 2021
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine
- Series page
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Section I Limits for IVF
- 1A Female Age 42 Years Should Be the Upper Limit for Conventional IVF/ICSI Treatment
- 1B Female Age 42 Years Should Be the Upper Limit for Conventional IVF/ICSI Treatment
- 2A Women with a BMI over 40 Should Be Refused Fertility Treatment
- 2B Women with a BMI over 40 Should Be Refused Fertility Treatment
- 3A Female Age of Menopause Is a Fair Limit for Ovum Donation
- 3B Female Age of Menopause Is a Fair Limit for Ovum Donation
- 4A Social Egg Freezing Should Be Available Up To the Age of 40 Years
- 4B Social Egg Freezing Should Be Available Up To the Age of 40 Years
- Section II IVF Add-ons
- Section III The Best Policy
- Section IV Embryology
- Section V Ethics and Statistics
- Section VI Male-factor Infertility
- Section VII Genetics
- Section VIII Ovarian Stimulation
- Section IX Hormones and the Environment
- Index
- References
Summary
Treatment, or denial of treatment, for infertility to women of advanced weight is not based on evidence, but rather ignorance and biases of care givers and public health systems. The association between obesity and subfertility is real, but much smaller than recognised. Obesity is not a personal choice, but the result of a complex disease and one that is generally resistant to most treatments. The hypothalamus holds onto weight as the miser holds onto gold. Long-term maintenance of significant weight loss is the exception and not the rule of the treatment of obesity. Further there is no evidence that weight loss prior to pregnancy in women with obesity improves live birth rates or lowers maternal morbidity during pregnancy. In fact, the data suggest taking time to lose weight results in a delayed time to delivery and potentially other adverse events such as increased early pregnancy loss. We should stop advising women with obesity to lose weight prior to conception, because obesity per se is a marginal issue in subfertility; effective therapies to achieve the recommended weight loss are lacking, and even if achieved, there may be no benefit to it.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- 50 Big Debates in Reproductive Medicine , pp. 11 - 14Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021