We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The technique for ultra rapid opioid detoxification is designed to shorten the detoxification period by precipitating withdrawal by the administration of opioid antagonists such as naloxone or naltrexone. This procedure is performed under deep sedation or general anaesthesia to ensure that the patient does not consciously experience the acute withdrawal phase. This strategy has aroused controversy regarding the risk of sedation or anaesthesia in this situation. In the present study, ultra rapid opioid detoxification was carried out in 12 opiate-addicted patients by infusion of naloxone 4 mg for a period of 5 h using controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia, induced and maintained with midazolam, propofol and atracurium. Invasive cardiovascular and respiratory monitoring was performed, and withdrawal signs were evaluated using a graduated scale. Anaesthesia was maintained for another hour after the completion of the naloxone infusion. The validity of this anaesthesia protocol was confirmed by the relative lack of change in the patients’ haemodynamic values associated with mild signs of withdrawal.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.