Many diseases are highly prevalent in older adults, yet older adults are often underrepresented in corresponding trials. Our objectives were to (1) determine alignment between Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol age ranges and enrollment demographics to disease demographics pre- and post-implementation of the 2019 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Lifespan Policy and (2) raise awareness about inclusive recruitment to principal investigators (PIs).

This was a pre-post study. We reviewed investigator-initiated studies meeting eligibility criteria at Oregon Health & Science University from 2017 to 2018 to determine baseline alignment. Alignment was defined by the level of matching between protocol/enrollment age and disease demographics: 2 points for full match, 1 point for partial match, and 0 points for mismatch. After the NIH policy implementation, we reviewed new studies for alignment. When a mismatch was determined, we contacted PIs (either at initial IRB protocol submission or during ongoing recruitment) to raise awareness and provide strategies to expand inclusion of older adults in their trials.

Studies that matched IRB protocol ages to disease demographics significantly improved from 78% pre-implementation to 91.2% post-implementation. Similarly, study enrollment ages matching disease demographics increased by 13.4% following the implementation (74.5%–87.9%). Out of 18 post-implementation mismatched studies, 7 PIs accepted a meeting and 3 subsequently changed their protocol age ranges.

This study highlights strategies that translational institutes and academic institutions could use to identify research studies whose participants do not align with disease demographics, offering opportunities for researcher awareness and training to enhance inclusion.

Qualitative research methods embedded within feasibility trials are of significant value as they can provide important information for a definitive trial, often unable to be fulfilled by quantitative methods alone. In addition, such information can aid researchers running other trials or evaluating interventions on a similar topic.

This study aimed to explore GP and nurses’ experiences of recruiting to a trial exploring the feasibility of evaluating YP Face IT, a novel online psychosocial intervention to support young people with appearance-altering conditions.

During the recruitment period, a focus group with participating GPs and nurses explored recruitment challenges. In addition, at the end of the recruitment period, telephone interviews were conducted with eight GPs and nurses involved in recruiting to the study, in order to inform a definitive trial of YP Face IT. Transcripts were subjected to thematic analysis.

Despite reporting that the study was valuable and interesting, interviewees struggled to recruit in-consultation. They appeared to lack confidence in raising the sensitive issue of a visible difference and adopted strategies to avoid mentioning the topic. Participants felt the nature of the target population, as well as pressures of the primary care environment presented challenges to recruitment, but welcomed YP Face IT as an intervention that could address unmet support needs. Primary care staff may benefit from training to help them raise the subject of a visible difference with young people in order to identify those that require additional support.