Effective, evidence-based psychological therapies for prolonged grief reactions exist but are not routinely available in United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) services. This audit evaluated the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of a high-intensity prolonged grief disorder therapy (PGDT) treatment pathway in an NHS Talking Therapies (NHS-TT) context for clients with a prolonged grief reaction alongside depression, anxiety and/or post-traumatic stress disorder. Seventeen experienced high-intensity therapists were trained to deliver PGDT. Ninety-one clients were treated between April 2022 and April 2024, 80 of whom met criteria and were included in this audit; 83% of clients completed at least four treatment sessions (a liberal estimate of minimum adequate dose), the mean number of sessions attended was 10.29 (SD=5.81) and rates of drop-out were low (16%). Data completeness rates were 100% depression, anxiety and functioning measures and 61% for the grief outcome (Brief Grief Questionnaire; BGQ). There was no evidence of treatment-related harms. There were statistically significant, large pre–post treatment effect size improvements across outcomes from intake to last treatment session (p<.001; Cohen’s d>1.05). According to NHS-TT outcome metrics for combined changes in anxiety and depression, 82% of clients exhibited reliable improvement, 72% showed recovery, and 68% of clients achieved reliable recovery. On the BGQ, rates of reliable improvement were 77% and rates of recovery were 63%. Effects held when focusing on the subgroup with more severe grief symptoms (intake BGQ≥8; n=40). These findings suggest it is feasible and probably effective to implement a PGDT pathway in an NHS-TT context.

1. (1) To become familiar with prolonged grief disorder (PGD) as a diagnostic construct.

2. (2) To gain insight into using prolonged grief disorder therapy (PGDT) to treat PGD.

3. (3) To understand ways to train and supervise National Health Service Talking Therapies (NHS-TT) high-intensity therapists to implement PGDT.

4. (4) To evaluate the potential feasibility and effectiveness of implementing PGDT in an NHS-TT context.

Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT) is a novel wellbeing and recovery-oriented psychological treatment for depression. A recent pilot trial run in a university clinic setting suggests ADepT has potential to be superior to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) at treating anhedonic depression in a NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression (NHS–TTad) context. Before proceeding to definitive trial in pragmatic settings, it is important to establish if therapists in routine NHS-TTad settings can be trained to deliver ADepT effectively and to assess therapist views on the feasibility and acceptability of ADepT in this context. A bespoke training and supervision pathway was developed (2-day workshop, four 2–hour skills classes, and 6 months of weekly supervision) and piloted with 11 experienced therapists working in a single NHS–TT service in Devon. Nine out of 11 therapists completed the placement, treating 24 clients with a primary presenting problem of depression; 21/24 completed a minimum adequate dose of therapy (≥8 sessions), with 17/24 (71%) showing reliable improvement and 12/24 (50%) exhibiting reliable recovery. Eight out of nine therapists submitted a session for competency assessment, all of whom were rated as competent. Nine therapists submitted feedback on their experiences of training. Eight out of nine therapists felt the ADepT model would be effective in an NHS–TTad context; that training was interesting, useful, well presented and enhanced their own wellbeing; and that they felt sufficiently skilled in core ADepT competencies at the end of the placement. This suggests that NHS–TTad therapists can be trained to deliver ADepT competently and view the treatment as feasible and acceptable.

1. (1) To become familiar with the Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT) approach for enhancing wellbeing in depression.

2. (2) To evaluate the potential utility and feasibility of ADepT model in NHS Talking Therapies Services (NHS–TTad).

3. (3) To understand the pilot ADepT training and supervision pathway for CBT therapists in NHS–TTad services.

4. (4) To consider the opportunities and challenges of training therapists to deliver ADepT in NHS–TTad services.

Despite evidence for its efficacy, exposure therapy for anxiety is rarely used in routine care settings. Efforts to address one major barrier to its use – therapists’ negative beliefs about exposure – have included therapist-level implementation strategies, such as training and consultation. Experiential training, in which therapists themselves undergo exposures, has recently demonstrated feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness for increasing exposure use.

This study aimed to assess: (1) therapists’ perceptions of experiential training and (2) barriers and facilitators to implementing exposure following training.

Therapists who underwent experiential training (n=12) completed qualitative interviews and quantitative questionnaires. Interviews were coded using an integrated approach, combining both inductive and deductive approaches. Mixed methods analyses examined how themes varied by practice setting (community mental health versus private practice) and exposure use.

Results highlight how therapist-level factors, such as clinician self-efficacy, interact with inner- and outer-setting factors. Participants reported positive perceptions of exposure after training; they noted that directly addressing myths about exposure and experiencing exposures themselves improved their attitudes toward exposure. Consistent with prior literature, issues such as insufficient supervisory support, organizational constraints, and client characteristics made it challenging to implement exposures.

Results highlight the benefits of experiential training, while also highlighting the need to consider contextual determinants. Differences in responses across practice settings highlight areas for intervention and the importance of tailoring implementation strategies. Barriers that were specific to therapists who did not use exposure (e.g. hesitancy about its appropriateness for most clients) point to directions for future implementation efforts.