We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 8 deals with the financial terms of licensing agreements, including fixed/up-front/lump sum payments, running royalties, sublicensing income, milestone payments (Law v. BioHeart), equity compensation, cost reimbursement (including for patent prosecution), most-favored clauses (Kohle v. Hercules) and audit clauses. Special attention is given to the calculation of license royalty rates, including tiered royalties, the royalty base (Allen Archerty v. Precision Shooting), the entire market value rule (EMVR), the smallest-salable patent practicing unit (SSPPU) rule, now-disfavored rules of thumb such as the 25% rule, standard exclusions from royalty calculations, minimum royalties, royalty caps, royalty stacking clauses and escalation clauses (Arbitron v. Tralyn Broadcasting). Special issues such as reach-through royalties and package royalties are also addressed.
Chapter 6 covers some of the fundamental building blocks of a licensing agreement, namely the license grant and scope (Spindelfabrik v. Schubert & Salzer): how are licensed rights identified -- by enumeration or through portfolio definitions? How are corporate affiliates treated by the licensor and the licensee? What is know-how licensing? How to deal with licenses of future rights? How should the licensed territory be defined? How can the field of use be limited? How do have-made and “foundry” rights work (Cyrix v. Intel)? How do technological changes affect the field of use (Boosey & Hawkes v. DIsney)? How should sublicensing be addressed (Rhone-Poulenc v. DeKalb)?
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.