To confirm the efficacy of pre-hospital administration of adenosine, using a 6 milligram (mg) initial dosing regimen, for the treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT).

Urban, suburban, rural emergency medical services (EMS) system in Clark County, Washington with advanced life support (ALS) patient transports. Concurrent, paramedic Medical Incident Report (MIR) review was conducted for 102 patients receiving prehospital adenosine during a 42-month period. Patients were administered 6 mg of adenosine using an intravenous (IV) bolus followed by 10 ml of balanced salt solution flush. If the patient's rhythm remained unchanged, the dosing regimen was increased to 12 mg followed by a 10 ml flush. This was repeated once more if the rhythm remained unchanged, to a total maximum dose of 30 mg. Medical direction for administration of adenosine was in the form of standing orders rather than direct (on-line) medical control.

Seventy-four of 102 patients had PSVT as determined by physician analysis of the initial six-second electrocardiographic rhythm strip (ECG) recording. Sixty-six of these patients converted their cardiac rhythm from PSVT using adenosine; 46 (70%) converted with the initial 6 mg bolus. Fifteen patients converted after receiving the second dose (12 mg); and five patients required 30 mg.

These results show that for paramedics, adenosine is an effective treatment for PSVT. An initial bolus of 6 mg converts the majority of cases. Eighty-nine percent of cases of confirmed PSVT converted with adenosine administration.

The use of direct medical control (DMC) in the out-of-hospital setting often is beneficial, but has the disadvantage of consuming emergency medical services (EMS) resources.

Uncomplicated, nontrauma, adult patients with chest pain can be treated safely and transported by paramedics without DMC.

Retrospective chart review of all nontrauma, adult patients with chest pain treated in a combined rural and suburban EMS system during a 2-year period (December 1990 through November 1992) was conducted. Before November 1991, DMC was mandatory for all patients with chest pain. Beginning 01 November 1991, if a patient had resolution of pain either spontaneously, with administration of oxygen, or after a single dose of nitroglycerin, DMC was at the discretion of the paramedic. Using the above criteria for inclusion, three study groups were defined: Group 1, before protocol change; Group 2, after protocol change without DMC; and Group 3, after protocol change when physician contact was obtained, but not required. These groups were compared for the following parameters: 1) scene time; 2) time to administration of first dose of nitroglycerin; 3) time interval between measurement of vital signs; 4) oxygen use; 5) intravenous access; and 6) electrocardiographic monitoring. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed by multivariate and univariate analysis of variance and chi-square tests, respectively.

Of 308 nontrauma, adult patients with chest pain, 71 met inclusion criteria in Group 1, 40 in Group 2, and 34 in Group 3. No statistically significant differences were identified in any of the study parameters.

Adult patients with chest pain who have no other symptoms or complicating conditions can be treated appropriately by paramedics without DMC.

To determine the frequency with which physician, on-line medical direction (OLMD) [direct medical control] of prehospital care results in orders, to describe the nature of these orders, and to measure OLMD time intervals.

Blinded, prospective study.

A university hospital base-station resource center.

Ten emergency physicians, 50 advanced life support providers.

Prehospital treatment was directed by both standing orders and OLMD physician orders. Independent observers recorded event times and the characteristics of OLMD.

Physician orders were given in 47 (19%) of the 245 study cases, and covered a variety of interventions, including many already authorized by standing orders. Mean OLMD radio time was four minutes (245 ± 216 seconds [sec]), and time from beginning of OLMD to hospital arrival averaged 12 minutes (718 ± 439 sec). Mean transport time in this system was 13 minutes.

Despite detailed standing orders, OLMD results in orders for clinical interventions in 19% of cases. On-line medical direction requires about four minutes of physician time per call. This constituted about one-third of the potential field treatment time interval in this system. Thus, OLMD appears to play an important role in providing quality prehospital care.

The aim of this study was to compare the patient care measures provided by paramedics according to standing orders versus measures ordered by direct [on-line] medical command in order to determine the types and frequency of medical command orders.

Prospective identification of patient care measures done as part of a prehospital quality assurance program.

An urban paramedic service in the northeast United States with direct medical command from three local hospitals.

One thousand eight paramedic reports from October 1992 through March 1993.

All patient care interventions recorded as done by standing orders or by direct medical command orders. Errors in patient care were determined by the same criteria as in the prior two studies of the same system.

Direct medical command gave orders in 143/1,008 (14.2%) cases. Paramedics performed 2,453/2,624 (93.5%) of the total patient care interventions using standing orders. In 61 cases (6.1 %), medical command ordered a potentially beneficial intervention not specified by standing orders or not done by the paramedic. 21/171 (12.3%) command orders were for additional doses of epinephrine or atropine in cardiac arrest cases (where the initial doses had been given under standing orders), and 59/171 (34.5%) were for interventions already mandated or permitted by standing orders. The paramedic error rate was 0.6%, and the medical command error rate was 1.8% (unchanged form the prior study of the same standing-orders system).

Direct medical command gave orders in 14% of cases in this standing-orders system, but 35% of command orders only reiterated the standing orders. More selective and reduced uses of on-line command could be done in this system with no change in the types or numbers of patient care interventions performed.