We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The Chapter describes the status of health financing in low- and middle-income countries (L&MICs) and their health financing transition over the past two decades. Advancing Universal Health Coverage (UHC) requires an expansion of coverage over three dimensions: (i) health care benefits, (ii) population coverage, and (iii) cost coverage using prepaid/pooled funds. As national incomes rise, countries undergo a health financing transition, increasing total levels of health expenditure while increasing the publicly financed share of health spending and reducing the external- and OOP-financed share of spending. Two pro-poor paths are common for the expansion of health coverage. Many countries implement health insurance schemes for the poor. Others expand platforms of public providers that are mostly used by the poor, often focusing on community and primary care services. Countries choosing the pro-poor health insurance path develop targeting and enrolment instruments. Targeting tends to be stricter with social security purchasers, compared with ministerial purchasers. Fragmented systems, while suboptimal, can sometimes be more pro-poor than integrated systems.
In the spring of 1974, the 31-year-old junior Senator from Delaware, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., published a law review article in which he decried the traditional system of privately financed election campaigns. Private financing, Senator Biden contended, “affords certain wealthy individuals or special interest groups the potential for exerting a disproportionate influence over both the electoral mechanism and the policy-making processes of the government.” Moreover, Biden urged, private funding poses an obstacle to the candidacies of “individuals of moderate means” and so was at odds with the “concept of American democracy [that] presumes that all citizens, regardless of access to wealth, have equal access to the political process.” In addition, he argued that private funding favored incumbents. To address the “Political Darwinism” of private financing, Biden called on Congress to adopt a system of public funding for all federal candidates.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.