We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Since its first bilateral investment treaty (BIT) with Sweden in 1982, China has signed BITs with more than 130 countries.In the earlier stage, China's BITs mainly follow the template or style as set by western countries.Yet with the development of economic growth, China is more willing to establish its own discourse.The Belt and Road Initiative, and the separate BIT negotiations with the US and the EU, reveal China’s proactive approach to participate in global economic governance.The experience in dealing with the cases filed by foreign investors against China has also enabled China to review its BIT policy and practice.Against this background, this chapter presents a stocktake of China’s practice in international investment law, and tries to find whether China could establish its discourse in this regime.By revealing the approach of utilitarianism and flexibility that underpins China’s BITs negotiations, it concludes that China is not simply copying or adopting in a wholesale manner the treaty texts presented by the EU or the US, but is making the necessary adjustments to craft agreements that take into account its own political system and economic realities.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.