We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Two-yr-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings were grown in sand culture for 1 yr with a generous supply of
a balanced nutrient solution. Trees were repotted into clean sand in February 1998 and given either a reduced or
adequate nutrient supply containing enriched 15N, 41K and 26Mg to label nutrient uptake during spring 1998.
Trees doubled their biomass during the experiment. Whole-tree net photosynthesis was reduced by 43% after 95
d in trees that received the lower nutrient supply (P < 0.001), although differences in biomass between the two
treatments were less pronounced. Remobilization contributed 83, 82 and 52% of the N, K and Mg, respectively,
used to support growth of new tissues in trees that received reduced nutrient supply. Those receiving the higher
nutrient supply still obtained 44–59% of nutrients used for spring growth of new tissues from remobilization.
Current nutrient supply had no significant effect on the amount of N or Mg remobilized to new tissues but K
remobilization was less in trees that received the lower nutrient supply (P = 0.025). The importance of
remobilization in young trees and problems associated with quantifying internal cycling of nutrients are discussed.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.