We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
James Law, University of Newcastle upon Tyne,Sheena Reilly, Griffith University, Queensland,Cristina McKean, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Disparities in language development emerge in the first year of life and increase with age; consequently, infancy and toddlerhood are key periods whereby early language outcomes may be optimised via prevention and early intervention programs. As yet, the efficacy of programs promoting early language in the first three years of life remains unknown. This chapter provides the reader with findings from a systematic review of interventions aimed at improving child language outcomes for 0–3 year olds. Using a narrative synthesis, we examine and describe the evidence for effective language interventions across the preventive intervention spectrum (universal, selective, indicated/targeted). Specifically, we explore what works for who and under what circumstances. This review provides important insights about early language interventions, including factors contributing to positive outcomes. Findings also suggest how early interventions may be tailored to foster language outcomes for different groups of children (i.e. targeting children at-risk based on low socio-economic status or those with identified language difficulties). This review also highlights the need for further evaluation of promising interventions when applied to the broader population.
Mental health crisis presentations are common in those who have a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD), and psychosocial interventions should be provided. However, there is limited evidence outlining what a crisis-focused psychosocial intervention for this population should include.
Aims
To conduct a systematic review and narrative synthesis of crisis-focused psychosocial interventions for people diagnosed with BPD.
Method
Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo) were searched for eligible studies. Studies were included if they were quantitative studies comparing a crisis-focused intervention with any control group and they included adults (18+ years of age) who were diagnosed with BPD (or with equivalent experiences). A narrative synthesis was undertaken to analyse results.
Results
A total of 3711 papers were initially identified, 95 full texts were screened and 5 studies were included in the review. Two of five studies reported on the same trial, so four individual trials were included. Overall moderate risk of bias across studies was identified. The review tentatively demonstrated that crisis-focused psychosocial interventions are feasible and acceptable to people with BPD and that they have potential impacts on outcomes such as self-harm and number of days spent in hospital. There is limited consensus on what outcome measures should be used to assess the impact of interventions.
Conclusions
There is presently insufficient data to recommend any specific psychosocial crisis intervention for people with BPD. Given the relationship between BPD and the high frequency of crises experienced by this group, further large-scale trials examining crisis-focused psychosocial interventions are required.
Statement on language
We acknowledge that the term personality disorder can be controversial and stigmatising. As the term borderline personality disorder has been retained in DSM-5 and is used in the research evidence base we have decided to use this term throughout this review. However, we recognise that this term may not be acceptable to all.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.