Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 2 - In Search of a Uniform Solution

  • from Part II - How to Face the Paradoxes?
  • Zach Weber, University of Otago, New Zealand
  • Book:
    Paradoxes and Inconsistent Mathematics
    Published online:
    08 October 2021
    Print publication:
    21 October 2021, pp 65-83

  • Summary

    This chapter considers two possible explanations for the paradoxes.One is Lawvere’s diagonal theorem from category theory. Theother is the inclosure schema, proposed by Priest as the structureof many paradoxes and a step toward a uniform solution to theparadoxes. Inclosure suggests that paradoxes arise at the limits ofthought because the limits can be surpassed, and also not. Theconsequences of accepting Priest’s proposal are explored, andit is found that, from a thoroughly dialetheic perspective, (i) somelimit phenomena cannot be contradictory, on pain of absurdity, and(ii) true contradictions are better thought of as local, not“limit,” phenomena. Dialetheism leads back from theedge of thought, to the inconsistent in the everyday.