Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 9 - The Transparent Allocation of Limited Rights

  • from Part II - Connecting Limited Rights
  • Edited by Chris Jansen, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Frank van Ommeren, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Johan Wolswinkel, Tilburg University, Sue Arrowsmith, University of Nottingham
  • Book:
    Optimizing Public Interests through Competitive Tendering
    Published online:
    11 April 2025
    Print publication:
    17 April 2025, pp 357-388

  • Summary

    This chapter departs from the assumption that, notwithstanding that transparency is an essential element of competitive allocation of limited rights, it is also a diffuse concept. There are many different transparency obligations, and not all obligations have the same effect on the realization of public interests. Based on an overview of the different types of transparency obligations, this chapter explores the relation between the various types of transparency obligations and traditional market goals on the one hand, and transparency obligations and other general interests on the other. The purpose of the analysis is to answer the question of how these transparency obligations should be designed to balance the various interests that are pursued with competitive allocation of limited rights, whenever transparency is concerned.