Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 7 - Borrowing from European Trials

  • from Part II - Adjudication
  • Christopher Slobogin, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
  • Book:
    Rehabilitating Criminal Justice
    Published online:
    17 April 2025
    Print publication:
    24 April 2025, pp 105-120

  • Summary

    Chapter 7 contends that, as implemented in the United States, adversarialism is a significant cause of many of the systemic flaws recounted in Chapter 6. It is thus also a significant cause of wrongful convictions, unjust sentences, and errant acquittals. Empirical evidence recounted in this chapter suggests that these errors could be significantly minimized if we modified the American practice of allowing the prosecution and the defense to dominate evidence production by adopting the hybrid inquisitorial regime found in some European countries. This chapter proposes the integration of three inquisitorial mechanisms into American trial procedure – judicial control over the adjudication process, nonadversarial treatment of experts, and required unsworn testimony by the defendant – and defends the proposals against constitutional and practical challenges. While other scholars have suggested borrowing from overseas, these three proposals have yet to be presented as a package. Together they could measurably enhance the accuracy of American criminal trials.