We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Armed conflicts cause substantial disruptions to health care systems, necessitating innovative approaches to crisis management. Systematic reviews play a critical role in evaluating adaptive health innovations implemented during such conflicts, shedding light on their impact on crisis management and health outcomes within affected communities.
Methods
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science resulted in 5432 articles. The review covered studies published since 2000 that addressed crisis management innovations. A rigorous selection process based on PICO criteria was employed to include relevant high-quality studies.
Results
Following screening, 21 studies were identified, demonstrating considerable innovation in health systems in conflict-affected regions. The key innovations were decentralized management structures, community health worker programs, and mobile health units, all aimed at enhancing service delivery under difficult circumstances. In spite of this, persistent challenges like infrastructure destruction, limited resources, and security risks remain substantial obstacles to the availability of health care.
Discussion
Findings highlight the critical role played by resilient health systems in mitigating the negative effects related to armed conflicts. While some innovations are promising, problems like resource constraints, infrastructure destruction, and data collection challenges remain unresolved. The review’s strengths lie in its systematic nature and extensive coverage of the literature, while potential publication bias and language restrictions should be acknowledged as limitations.
Conclusions
The present review highlights the key role of adaptive health responses in crisis management and demands more research on their long-term effects and scalability. Future research must examine comparisons across a number of nations and utilize technology, including telemedicine and digital platforms, to strengthen health care resilience in areas impacted by conflict.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.