Sixty patients were randomly assigned to two equal groups. Group I received epidural morphine 1 mg after surgery and used a patient-controlled analgesia device programmed to deliver morphine 0.2 mg h−1, 0.2 mg per bolus. Group II received an epidural loading dose of morphine 1 mg plus ketamine 5 mg and used a patient-controlled analgesia device programmed to deliver morphine 0.2 mg+ketamine 0.5 mg h−1, morphine 0.2 mg+ketamine 0.5 mg per bolus with a lockout time of 10 min. The mean morphine consumption was 8.6±0.7 mg for group I and 6.2±0.2 mg for group II. Although group II utilized significantly less morphine (P<0.05), pain relief was significantly better in group II than in group I (P<0.05) in the first 3 h. Vomiting occurred more frequently in group I (26%) than in group II (13%). The frequency and severity of pruritus and level of sedation were similar in the two groups. These findings suggest that patient-controlled epidural analgesia with morphine plus ketamine may provide effective analgesia with a lesser dose of morphine and fewer subsequent side effects, compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia with morphine alone after lower abdominal surgery.

Local anaesthetics injected into the epidural space may deform the dural sac to a variable degree, thereby contributing to variability in the extent of the block. We investigated deformation of the lumbar dural sac after injection into the lumbar epidural space. The subjects were 26 patients with low-back pain who underwent lumbar epidurography and computed tomographic (CT) epidurography, of whom seven also underwent myelography and computed tomographic myelography. The epidural space was entered via the sacral hiatus in 24 patients and through the L5/S1 interspace in two patients. Ten millilitres of local anaesthetic was then injected into the epidural space followed by 20 mL of contrast medium. Computed tomographic epidurography was undertaken approximately 30 min after the epidural injection at the mid-vertebral and mid-discal levels from the first lumbar through to the first sacral vertebrae. The dural sac usually showed an oval or hexagonal shape on the transverse views at the first and second lumbar vertebral levels, and the shape of an inverted triangle below the level of the third lumbar vertebra. A median line of translucency was also observed on the postero-anterior epidurographic view in 25 of the 26 patients. This line was thought to be a manifestation of the dural deformation to the inverted triangle. Dural sac deformation usually shows a specific pattern, although there are individual variations. Dural deformability is an important consideration in any analysis of the spread of epidural block or of the changes of epidural pressure after epidural injection of local anaesthetics.

We have studied the optimal diluent volume for post-operative analgesia and sedation produced by epidurally administered midazolam after upper abdominal surgery. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to four groups of 15 patients. When patients complained of pain after surgery, epidural midazolam 0.05 mg kg−1 in 3 mL saline (Group A), in 5 mL saline (Group B), in 10 mL saline (Group C) or in 15 mL saline (Group D) were injected as a bolus. The sedation was better and lasted longer in groups B and C than in the other two groups. Groups B and C also had significantly more extensive areas of analgesia than groups A and D from 30 min after the administration of midazolam. The interval to the second request for an analgesic was significantly shorter in Group D than in the other three groups. Memory retention of the pin-prick examination was reported by four patients in Group A. The present results indicate that 5–10 mL saline is the optimal volume for epidural injection when using midazolam 0.05 mg kg−1 for post-operative analgesia following upper abdominal surgery.

An analysis of all perinatal deaths occurring in twin pregnancies in Dundee women from 1956 to 1983 was performed. The uncorrected perinatal mortality rate fell from 116/1000 births in 1956-60 to 16/1000 births in 1981-83, this fall almost entirely taking place after 1975. Causes of death were identified using the Aberdeen Classification and a reduction in deaths in all cause groupings occurred. About half of the deaths were in the Premature, Cause Unknown group and a marked decrease in deaths in this group made the largest contribution to the improved perinatal mortality rate. This fall was partly due to a reduction in the incidence of extreme prematurity and low birth weight. Changes in obstetric management which may have influenced outcome included the introduction of routine early pregnancy ultrasound scanning, the use of tocolytic drugs, intrapartum fetal monitoring, epidural analgesia and an increase in Caesarean section rate from 2% in 1956-60 to 39% in 1981-83.