We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The notion of efficient trade-offs is popular in studies of language from an efficiency perspective. These studies represent a valuable contribution to functional approaches to language. They provide interesting hypotheses for large-scale empirical investigations. At the same time, trade-offs can turn out to be oversimplifications when we focus only on correlations between two variables. The next step is to investigate causal (directional) networks with multiple factors that can influence language use and structure. A first attempt is shown in the case study of Subject and Object cues. We find that the correlation between word order freedom and case marking is robust and cannot be reduced to the effect of other linguistic cues. Also, the causal analyses suggest that the causal direction is more likely to be from word order to case marking than the other way round. At the same time, the evidence makes us conclude that the way efficiency is reflected in aggregate linguistic variables is anything but straightforward.
Except in broad outline, little is known about the most likely symptomatic trajectories in prodromal schizophrenia. The aim of this study is to delineate these pathways.
Methods
Taking into account existing clinical knowledge, the causal relationships between the 12 prodrome scales of the Schizotypic Syndrome Questionnaire (SSQ) were examined in a general-population sample by applying the mathematical theory of directed graphs. Use was made of two discovery algorithms implemented in the Tetrad-4 program, as well as of the graphical DAGitty program to test whether a particular model holds.
Results
A promising model was selected that may describe the causal pathways in schizophrenic prodromal unfolding. Testing this model by means of DAGitty, it was shown that the minimal testable implications, listed as conditional independences, and the direct and total effects in the model, identified after correction for bias, were as hypothesized. For practical reasons, a simpler version of the resulting SSQ model, containing only its principal pathways, was provided.
Conclusions
Although resembling an earlier model that was based on a series of LISREL analyses, the present model was believed to provide a more dependable description of schizophrenic prodromal unfolding, as it relies on methods that are less subject to the limitations involved in SEM.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.