We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Groups of cattle were immunized with 10−2 dilutions of sporozoite stabilates of Theileria parva lawrencei derived from African buffaloes either alone or in combination with Theileria parva parva derived from cattle and concomitant treatment with either long or short-acting formulations of oxytetracyline. At 90 or 120 days after infection, uninfected Rhipicephalus appendiculatus nymphal ticks were applied to individual immunized cattle and the resultant adults ticks were applied to individual susceptible cattle. Theilerial infection developed from ticks fed on 6 out of 11 animals investigated for evidence of a carrier state. Two additional animals were shown by cell-culture isolation to have persistent theilerial infections. Nine cattle infected with the parasites from carrier animals were treated with parvaquone and 7 recovered. These recovered cattle were then challenged with the original immunizing stabilates at 10° dilution together with the original immunized and carrier cattle. Six out of 7 cattle which had recovered from carrier-derived infection succumbed to this challenge and died but none of the original immunized cattle showed theilerial reactions. When a carrier-derived sporozoite stabilate was used to challenge cattle immune to the original immunizing parasite, they proved to be immune. Cattle immune to the carrier-derived parasites were all immune to challenge with the original parasite. A monoclonal antibody profile aginst T. parva schizonts isolated by cell culture from samples of the experimental animals did not appear to be sensitive enough to determine the antigenic differences between the carrier-derived parasite and the original immunizing parasite. Indications are that the carrier state is not likely to produce new antigenic strains which would be dangerous to immunized cattle.
Groups of cattle were immunized with 10−2 dilutions of sporozoite stabilates of Theileria parva lawrencei derived from African buffaloes either alone or in combination with Theileria parva parva derived from cattle and concomitant treatment with either long or short-acting formulations of oxytetracyline. At 90 or 120 days after infection, uninfected Rhipicephalus appendiculatus nymphal ticks were applied to individual immunized cattle and the resultant adults ticks were applied to individual susceptible cattle. Theilerial infection developed from ticks fed on 6 out of 11 animals investigated for evidence of a carrier state. Two additional animals were shown by cell-culture isolation to have persistent theilerial infections. Nine cattle infected with the parasites from carrier animals were treated with parvaquone and 7 recovered. These recovered cattle were then challenged with the original immunizing stabilates at 10° dilution together with the original immunized and carrier cattle. Six out of 7 cattle which had recovered from carrier-derived infection succumbed to this challenge and died but none of the original immunized cattle showed theilerial reactions. When a carrier-derived sporozoite stabilate was used to challenge cattle immune to the original immunizing parasite, they proved to be immune. Cattle immune to the carrier-derived parasites were all immune to challenge with the original parasite. A monoclonal antibody profile aginst T. parva schizonts isolated by cell culture from samples of the experimental animals did not appear to be sensitive enough to determine the antigenic differences between the carrier-derived parasite and the original immunizing parasite. Indications are that the carrier state is not likely to produce new antigenic strains which would be dangerous to immunized cattle.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.