We consider two phenomena, related to the host age-intensity profiles of parasitic infections, which have been suggested to be indicative of acquired immunity: (i) a lower age of peak intensity among more intensely infected hosts; and (ii) a decline with age in the dispersion of the distribution of parasites between hosts. We demonstrate that these phenomena occur among Kenyan schoolchildren infected with Schistosoma mansoni, although the magnitude of both is small. We also examine the mathematical models underlying these predictions and conclude that both phenomena are possible in the absence of acquired immunity or, indeed, in the absence of any density-dependent effect. In our opinion, insufficient attention has been focused upon mathematical models, describing the null hypothesis, i.e. density-independent models. In particular, we regard the usual assumptions made for the two stochastic components of these models, describing the heterogeneity between hosts and the probabilistic nature of infection and death of parasites, as too rigid and unrealistic. We demonstrate that deviation from these assumptions undermines the qualitative distinctions between models which describe acquired immunity or density dependence and those which are density-independent.

In a fishing community on Lake Albert in Uganda the pattern of intensity of Schistosoma mansoni infection 6 months after treatment with praziquantel was found to be very similar to reinfection patterns seen in previously studied endemic communities: the profile peaks sharply at around the age of 10 years falling away rapidly to much lower levels in adults. This is in stark contrast to the patterns of water contact, which differ greatly between fishing and non-fishing communities. On Lake Albert, adults appear to be more heavily exposed than children. From these observations we conclude that adults are physiologically (perhaps immunologically) more resistant to infection after treatment than children.