We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter discusses social-cognitive domain theory (SCDT) as a theoretical lens for studying parental monitoring and adolescents’ information management. Theoretical concepts are presented, social cognitive domains are defined, and research applying SCDT to parenting and adolescent information management is reviewed. Research on various beliefs (parental authority legitimacy, parents’ right to know about adolescents’ behaviors, adolescents’ obligations to disclose to and obey parents) and adolescents’ reasons for disclosing and concealing information are discussed and related to adolescents’ disclosure and nondisclosure. Distinctions are drawn between issues that are legitimately regulated by parents (i.e. moral, conventional, prudential issues) and those viewed as personal prerogatives and essential to autonomy and identity development. Developmental changes, cultural variations, and parent-adolescent discrepancies in beliefs are discussed, and explanations are considered for observed discrepancies between youth’s beliefs about obligations to disclose their risky behaviors and involvement in those behaviors. The chapter concludes with directions for future research.
This chapter considers parental monitoring behaviors through the lens of Communication Privacy Management theory (CPM; Petronio, 2002). This chapter details the personal, relational, and cultural factors that guide changes in family privacy boundaries during adolescence, drawing parallels with other prominent theories of social development. Youth can interpret both overt (parental solicitation and control) and covert (“snooping”) monitoring as invasive of privacy; these subjective invasion perceptions are intricately associated with adolescent’s attempts to manage their personal information and maintain desired levels of privacy, but prior research is inconsistent regarding the presence, directionality, and valence of effects. Cultural factors can potentially explain this heterogeneity, including independent versus interdependent orientations toward self-construal, horizontal versus vertical orientations toward privacy control, and power distance in family relationships. Future research should examine parental motivations for intrusive monitoring, the accuracy of youth reports about such practices, and how families should handle information uncovered through parental invasions.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.