We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Body cell mass (BCM) is a valuable measure of functional nutritional status in children. As BCM is related to body size, it is essential that BCM is adjusted for stature when interpreting BCM data in children. Our aim was to examine the relationship between height and BCM in healthy children to determine the power by which height should be raised to adjust BCM for stature. This cross-sectional study calculated BCM by 40K counting in 146 healthy children aged between 5 and 18 years. The relationship between BCM and height was explored using log–log regression. The present results demonstrate that the power by which height should be raised to adjust for BCM in females is 2·39 (se 0·09) and for males is 2·92 (se 0·10). A simplified sex-specific version of the index, BCM/height2·5 for females and BCM/height3 for males, was found to be statistically valid and numerically convenient, with the proportion of variation that could be attributed to height being less than 2 %. The present study shows that there is a difference in the relationship between height and BCM for males and females and that BCM can be adjusted in children using the BCM index of BCM/height2·5 for females and BCM/height3 for males.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.